Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Iain99 (talk | contribs) at 14:19, 2 August 2012 (→‎File:Abruzzi on Chogolisa.jpg: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions nor to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions on the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

Giuntini Project II

Article was deleted under Criteria for Speedy Deletion A9. I feel that the album in question does have significance as it features former Black Sabbath singer Tony Martin, who's career has been both prolific and generally notable. Also, the artist page for this album, Giuntini Project now exists. I would like to request that the deletion of this page be reconsidered. -Liambarrett1986 (talk) 11:20, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. The article was tagged for deletion, but was redirected instead. If you can argue and prove appropriate notability, you may be able to return it to an article instead of a redirect, but the text that was there - including your argument above - are not sufficient to do so. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 13:43, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
What exactly would be grounds for notability? If I could have a few examples of what kind of criteria are generally accepted, I could perhaps make a better argument. Thanks. - Liambarrett1986 (talk) 16:33, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

John Foster Forbes

Deletion of article made by banned user. I would like to look it over and, if it seems alright and notable, take responsibility for the content and reinstate it into mainspace. Please userfy it to User:Silver seren/John Foster Forbes. -SilverserenC 09:01, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gunnar Larson

reasoning -Mflynn12 (talk) 14:40, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Current title for page 3

Please userfy and restore to User:Wbm1058/Current title for page 3. I am trying to restore to service the AWOL RM bot and would like to see the contents of this page and its history for clues as to its problems. Thanks -Wbm1058 (talk) 00:24, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 09:44, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Janus (multi-agent and holonic platform)

The wiki page contains informations on the Janus platform. This platform is used by several Universities around the world. I think that it is important for this open source project to have a front end on wikipedia to increase its visibility -88.183.116.240 (talk) 16:26, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done and will not be done "to increase its visibility"? See WP:PROMOTION and WP:NOBLECAUSE. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:00, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unyon ng mga Arkitekto ng Pilipinas (UAP) - Singapore Chapter

I saw some articles regarding other Architectural Organizations here in Wiki like AIA (American Institute of Architects) & UIA (International Union of Architects) these are all organizations such as the one that I also made. It's a bit unfair these articles exist and mine cannot. I hope you can consider my article to be published here in Wikipedia. Thanks! -Bongdapogi (talk) 02:28, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kimberly Freeman

The reason I think the page should be undeleted is because Kimberly Freeman is a pretty famous singer. I have seen the reason this page was deleted and it is because she is not notable enough. Kimberly Freeman had published 6 albums and 9 singles. She has also received many awards and has been featured in magazines. She also appeared in AdventureQuest Worlds,(a massive online role playing game) and on Americas Got Talent. She have around 1400 Facebook fans, 7000 twitter followers, 26000 Myspace friends, 3000 Youtube subscribers, over 7000,000 views on her music videos and thousands of videos made by her fans. She even have a website for her band One Eyed Doll where you can by her music and merchandise. I think that makes her pretty notable. -174.1.215.93 (talk) 02:41, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimberly Freeman, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Spartaz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Skier Dude (talk) 07:05, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dencia's wiki page was deleted,why? We did everything you asked

Hi,I created Dencia's wiki page,I added external links as asked but you deleted it,she's an artist and needs a wiki page but you or omeone reps deleting,why? -Parisdiva26 (talk) 15:52, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:14, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

BOFI Advisor

The information about BOFI Advisor is well within the parameters laid down by Wikipedia. If the term “institution” has been interpreted to mean “school”, then I would like to point out that “institution” in the context of BOFI Advisor was used just to imply a financial or banking institution. Many established banks are classified as “financial or banking institutions” in industry communication and numerous media platforms.

BOFI is a pioneer of internet banking and in this respect it deserves to be in the Wikipedia encyclopedia. In this age of internet banking the significance or importance of one of the pioneers of this form of banking cannot be underscored. The readers would appreciate this bit of information that Wikipedia has not covered till date -Jwaite87 (talk) 16:32, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:08, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tony_Wallace_(footballer)

made fully professional debut for morton today -Salty1984 (talk) 18:24, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind remaking it from scratch, as I have never seen the original version. Let me know and I'll just do that! Salty1984 (talk) 18:50, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of family offices in Australia

reasoning -42.241.82.53 (talk) 23:03, 28 July 2012 (UTC) Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. LadyofShalott 01:20, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chris DeRosa

references -Knowingdrums (talk) 00:08, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Chris DeRosa Article

Evans Drumhead Artist Chris DeRosa Listing

BlackPage Chris DeRosa Interview

Artist Chris DeRosa Article

Chris DeRosa Tour Write Up

CdBaby Offerings Chris DeRosa

Artist Chris DeRosa Article

  • Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris DeRosa, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Ron Ritzman (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. LadyofShalott 01:09, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kappa Phi Delta

this is one of the country's oldest local sororities. I am currently an active member of this sorority at the Illinois Institute of Technology, and by having this page exist, we can better represent ourselves and what we stand for to the public. It is an important organization, and should have a page. Thank you very much. -76.202.211.39 (talk) 23:10, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Neutrality (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days to which you could contribute. Wikipedia is not here to help you represent yourselves to the public; if the article is to be kept, it needs to establish Wikipedia:Notability, which is not a matter of opinion but has to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Experience suggests that local sororities and fraternities are unlikely to be notable in Wikipedia's sense: see Wikipedia:College and university article guidelines, particularly the section Student life. JohnCD (talk) 09:29, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Valitor

I request an admin userfy this article and its entire history so I can review it and work on it. The article was deleted for "G11: Blatant advertising" -Bensin (talk) 06:12, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. It was not only spammy ("We are focused on delivering quality service... " etc., plus address and phone number), it was copied from their website at http://www.valitor.com, so it cannot be restored. The history was simple: it was posted on 30 April 2008, the automatic Coren Searchbot at once flagged it as a copyright violation, and 15 minutes later NawlinWiki (talk) zapped it. You will have to start from scratch. JohnCD (talk) 09:19, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I would have preferred to re-work the deleted article, even if it meant a complete overhaul. If nothing else then for the preservation of the article history so that everybody can se who did what. --Bensin (talk) 10:58, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The text was a copyright violation, so it cannot be restored, even temporarily. I will email it to you if you like, and if you enable email on your account (at the bottom of the "User profile" tab under "My preferences") but it really won't help you much - it was five lines of the sort of stuff you will see on their website, plus their address, phone number and website. The history is not illuminating or helpful either: it was posted by Stigurv (talk · contribs), flagged as a copyvio by CorenSearchBot, and tagged {{db-spam}} by Dekisugi (talk · contribs), all in the same minute at 15:16, 30 April 2008, and deleted as advertising by NawlinWiki (talk · contribs) at 15:30. JohnCD (talk) 15:55, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That's OK. I really appreciate your offer though! I prefer preservation of the article history whenever possible so that anyone who is interested can review the history when they want to. I understand your position on why the article can't be restored, but I'm not sure I share it. If someone adds copyrighted material to an existing article we simply revert that edit and move on. I may be wrong, but as far as I know we rarely oversight that edit but the old version is instead still available in the article history, so there appears to be a discrepancy in policy enforcement there. Anyway, I'll rewrite the article from scratch. Thank you for taking your time to explain your position, for looking into the history and letting me know the details. --Bensin (talk) 09:23, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Types of cities by geographical region

reasoning - פארוק (talk) 07:31, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

please return it it back. i want to try to expand it as much as possible. פארוק (talk) 07:31, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. This article was deleted as a result of the deletion discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/Types of cities by geographical region so, as clearly stated at the top of this page, it will not be restored here. If you think the debate was wrongly decided, or you have new information, you should approach user The Bushranger (talk), the administrator who closed the discussion; then, if your concerns are not addressed, you can take them to WP:Deletion review. Before doing that, you should read WP:NOTESSAY, WP:No original research and WP:Verifiability to understand why this is unlikely to be an acceptable Wikipedia article. JohnCD (talk) 09:43, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Amrish Shah

Sire, Amrish Shah is a screenplay writer and he is the same person as listed in the following Wikipedia Article page of the film : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_2 . Thank you -SiddharthRg (talk) 08:12, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Any biography of a living person is deleted after ten days if it does not have at least one reliable source to confirm what it says. The subject's own website is not considered reliable for this purpose. I have restored the page and reset the ten-day clock. If the article is to be kept in the longer term, it needs to establish Wikipedia:Notability by references that show "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject", see also WP:42 and WP:CREATIVE. JohnCD (talk) 09:58, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Luis Beethoven Galvez

Because i didnt have time to make changes, I wasn't sure what changes needed to be made, this is a very influential doom metal guitarist that desrves to be recognized in wikipedia. -Smoofest (talk) 22:24, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. The page has not been deleted, your contribution is still there in the history, but another editor, DoriSmith (talk · contribs) redirected it, for the reason given in her edit summary: "Redirect to existing band page until there's something encyclopedic to say about him." Looking at the content before that, I have to say I agree with her: "Old school metalhead who's been seen swinging his studded belt at laholmsägen, Halmstad. Used to frequent a mid nineties bar called BM... " etc is material for a gossip column or a fan-site, not an encyclopedia. Unless there are references to show WP:Notability independent of his band, a redirect to its article is the best way to cover him. But this is a matter for editing and discussion. More advice on your talk page soon. JohnCD (talk) 22:51, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nikhil Upreti

reasoning -Milan 06:49, 31 July 2012 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Meellon (talk • contribs)

Sorry for late reply. The Reason behind the deletion of article was lack of reliable links.

Here are some links.

official website of the person: http://nikhiluprety.ezine.com.np/

http://www.whataboutu.com/list_Nikhil+Uprety~8779.html

Mega-Octane

Please userify so I can place it at Wikialpha.org under fair use license. -Mathewignash (talk) 16:12, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PHD_(advertising)

the article was deleted based on G11 using speedy deletion process. Note that G11 reads "Pages that are exclusively promotional, and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic. Note: An article about a company or a product which describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion" - this article was about a company. I am not affiliated with the company in any way yet want to do research on the company - the page should be restored. If the page was out of compliance in that it was not considered neutral, my reading of the deletion guidelines suggest that a "blanking" of the page would make more sense. -carol sue haney (talk) 19:42, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not done and will not be done That was a completely worthless piece of advertising, with nothing worth salvaging. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:48, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The "article" was only five lines of PR-speak, nothing you won't find on their website. JohnCD (talk) 21:40, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mybnk

I'm an independent financial adviser and wanted to let people know about this charity who are providing young people with financial education. Other providers have Wiki pages, can't see the problem in this small noting. -Martyhobby (talk) 14:46, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Lectonar (talk) 14:58, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abruzzi on Chogolisa.jpg

Someone transferred this to Commons despite the fact that it's not in the public domain in Italy until 2014 and (IIRC) it was tagged as such. It's now (correctly) up for deletion there. Can the local version be restored please? -Iain99Balderdash and piffle 14:19, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=505427786"