Jump to content

Mongolic languages

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 50.37.95.39 (talk) at 04:45, 26 August 2018 (→‎Classification). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Mongolic
Geographic
distribution
Mongolia; Inner Mongolia and regions close to its border, Xinjiang, Gansu, Qinghai (China); Buryatia, Kalmykia (Russia) and Herat (Afghanistan)
Linguistic classificationKhitan–Mongolic?[1] (see below)
Otherwise one of the world's primary language families
Proto-languageProto-Mongolic
Subdivisions
  • Central Mongolic
  • Southern Mongolic
  • Daur
  • Moghol
ISO 639-5xgn
Glottologmong1329
Topographic map showing Asia as centered on modern-day Mongolia and Kazakhstan. Areas are marked in multiple colors and attributed some of the language names of Mongolic languages. The extent of the colored area is somewhat less than in the previous map.
Geographic distribution of the Mongolic languages

The Mongolic languages are a group of languages spoken in East-Central Asia, mostly in Mongolia and surrounding areas plus in Kalmykia. The best-known member of this language family, Mongolian, is the primary language of most of the residents of Mongolia and the Mongolian residents of Inner Mongolia, China with an estimated 5.7+ million speakers.[2]

The closest relatives of the Mongolic languages appear to be the extinct Khitan[1] and Tuyuhun languages. Some linguists have grouped Mongolic with Turkic, Tungusic, and possibly Koreanic and Japonic as part of the controversial Altaic family.[3]

Classification

Historical Mongolic:

  • Middle Mongol (depending on classification spoken from the 13th century until the early 15th century[4] or late 16th century[5]; given the almost entire lack of written sources for the period in between, an exact cutoff point cannot be established)
  • Classical Mongolian, from approximately 1700 to 1900

Contemporary Mongolic:

Alexander Vovin (2007) identifies the extinct Tabγač or Tuoba language as a Mongolic language.[6] However, Chen (2005)[7] argues that Tuoba (Tabγač) was a Turkic language.

The classification and numbers of speakers above follow Janhunen (2006)[8] except for Southern Mongolic, which follows Nugteren (2011).[9] In another classificational approach,[10] there is a tendency to call Central Mongolian a language consisting of Mongolian proper, Oirat and Buryat, while Ordos (and implicitly also Khamnigan) is seen as a variety of Mongolian proper. Within Mongolian proper, they then draw a distinction between Khalkha on the one hand and Southern Mongolian (containing everything else) on the other hand. A less common subdivision of Central Mongolic is to divide it into a Central dialect (Khalkha, Chakhar, Ordos), an Eastern dialect (Kharchin, Khorchin), a Western dialect (Oirat, Kalmyk), and a Northern dialect (consisting of two Buryat varieties).[11] The broader delimitation of Mongolian may be based on mutual intelligibility, but an analysis based on a tree diagram such as the one above faces other problems because of the close contacts between, for example, Buryat and Khalkha Mongols during history, thus creating or preserving a dialect continuum. Another problem lies in the sheer comparability of terminology l,as Western linguists use language and dialect, while Mongolian linguists use the Grimmian trichotomy language (kele), dialect (nutuγ-un ayalγu) and Mundart (aman ayalγu).

Proto-Mongolic

Proto-Mongolic, the ancestor language of the modern Mongolic languages, is very close to Middle Mongol, the language spoken at the time of Genghis Khan and the Mongol Empire. Most features of modern Mongolic languages can thus be reconstructed from Middle Mongol. An exception would be the voice suffix like -caga- 'do together', which can be reconstructed from the modern languages but is not attested in Middle Mongol.

One can speculate that the languages of Donghu, Wuhuan, and Xianbei might be related to Proto-Mongolic.[12] For Tabghach, the language of the founders of the Northern Wei dynasty for which the surviving evidence is very sparse, and Khitan, for which evidence exists that is written in the two Khitan scripts which have as yet not been fully deciphered, a direct affiliation to Mongolic can now be taken to be most likely or even demonstrated.[13]

Para-Mongolic

The extinct Khitan language is a "Para-Mongolic" language, meaning that it is related to the Mongolic languages as a sister group, rather than as a direct descendant of Proto-Mongolic.[1]

Alexander Vovin (2015) identifies the extinct Tuyuhun language as yet another Para-Mongolic language.[14]

Notes

  1. ^ a b c Juha Janhunen (2006). The Mongolic Languages. Routledge. p. 393. ISBN 978-1-135-79690-7.
  2. ^ Svantesson et al. (2005:141)
  3. ^ e.g. Starostin, Dybo & Mudrak (2003); contra e.g. Vovin (2005)
  4. ^ Rybatzki (2003:57)
  5. ^ Poppe (1964:1)
  6. ^ Vovin, Alexander. 2007. ‘Once again on the Tabγač language.’ Mongolian Studies XXIX: 191-206.
  7. ^ Chen, Sanping 2005. Turkic or Proto-Mongolian? A Note on the Tuoba Language. Central Asiatic Journal 49.2: 161-73.
  8. ^ Janhunen (2006:232–233)
  9. ^ Nugteren (2011)
  10. ^ e.g. Sečenbaγatur et al. (2005:193–194)
  11. ^ Luvsanvandan (1959) quoted from Sečenbaγatur et al. (2005:167–168)
  12. ^ Andrews (1999:72), "[...] believed that at least some of their constituent tribes spoke a Mongolian language, though there is still some argument that a particular variety of Turkic may have been spoken among them."
  13. ^ see Vovin 2007 for Tabghach and Janhunen 2012 for Khitan
  14. ^ Vovin, Alexander. 2015. Some notes on the Tuyuhun (吐谷渾) language: in the footsteps of Paul Pelliot. In Journal of Sino-Western Communications, Volume 7, Issue 2 (December 2015).

References

  • Andrews, Peter A. (1999). Felt tents and pavilions: the nomadic tradition and its interaction with princely tentage, Volume 1. Melisende. ISBN 1-901764-03-6. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Janhunen, Juha, ed. (2003). The Mongolic languages. Routledge Language Family Series. London: Routledge. ISBN 0-7007-1133-3.
    • Rybatzki, Volker (2003). "Middle Mongol". In Janhunen, J. (ed.). pp. 47–82. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)
  • Janhunen, Juha. 2012. Khitan – Understanding the language behind the scripts. SCRIPTA, Vol. 4: 107–132.
  • Janhunen, Juha (2006). "Mongolic languages". In Brown, K. (ed.). The encyclopedia of language & linguistics. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 231–234. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Luvsanvandan, Š. (1959). "Mongol hel ajalguuny učir". Mongolyn sudlal. 1. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Nugteren, Hans (2011). Mongolic Phonology and the Qinghai-Gansu Languages (Ph.D.). Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics / Landelijke – LOT. {{cite thesis}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Poppe, Nicholas (1964) [1954]. Grammar of Written Mongolian. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Sechenbaatar, Borjigin (2003). The Chakhar dialect of Mongol – A morphological description. Helsinki: Finno-Ugrian society.
  • [Sechenbaatar] Sečenbaγatur, Qasgerel, Tuyaγ-a, B. ǰirannige, U Ying ǰe. (2005). Mongγul kelen-ü nutuγ-un ayalγun-u sinǰilel-ün uduridqal. Kökeqota: ÖMAKQ.
  • Starostin, Sergei A.; Dybo, Anna V.; Mudrak, Oleg A. (2003). Etymological Dictionary of the Altaic Languages. Leiden: Brill. {{cite encyclopedia}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)
  • Svantesson, Jan-Olof; Tsendina, Anna; Karlsson, Anastasia; Franzén, Vivan (2005). The Phonology of Mongolian. New York: Oxford University Press. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Vovin, Alexander (2005). "The end of the Altaic controversy (review of Starostin et al. 2003)". Central Asiatic Journal. 49 (1): 71–132. {{cite journal}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help)
  • Vovin, Alexander. 2007. Once again on the Tabgač language. Mongolian Studies XXIX: 191–206.