User talk:Ealdgyth/Archive 79
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:35, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2019).
Administrator changes
EvergreenFir • ToBeFree
Akhilleus • Athaenara • John Vandenberg • Melchoir • MichaelQSchmidt • NeilN • Youngamerican • 😂
CheckUser changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC on the administrator resysop criteria was closed. 18 proposals have been summarised with a variety of supported and opposed statements. The inactivity grace period within which a new request for adminship is not required has been reduced from three years to two. Additionally, Bureaucrats are permitted to use their discretion when returning administrator rights.
- Following a proposal, the edit filter mailing list has been opened up to users with the Edit Filter Helper right.
Technical news
- Wikimedia projects can set a default block length for users via MediaWiki:ipb-default-expiry. A new page, MediaWiki:ipb-default-expiry-ip, allows the setting of a different default block length for IP editors. Neither is currently used. (T219126)
Arbitration
- Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee Elections is open to eligible editors until Monday 23:59, 2 December 2018 UTC. Please review the candidates and, if you wish to do so, submit your choices on the voting page.
Miscellaneous
- The global consultation on partial and temporary office actions that ended in October received a closing statement from staff concluding, among other things, that the WMF
will no longer use partial or temporary Office Action bans... until and unless community consensus that they are of value or Board directive
.
- The global consultation on partial and temporary office actions that ended in October received a closing statement from staff concluding, among other things, that the WMF
Good luck
Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
このミラPはEaldgythたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます！
フレフレ、みんなの未来！/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラP 04:15, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Additional nomination
Congratulations on your appointment. San Francisco–Oakland Bay Bridge half dollar has been awaiting promotion for two weeks. I trust there is no objection to my nomination of New Rochelle 250th Anniversary half dollar. It is hard enough to attract reviews these days, there starts to be a difficulty when nominations start to cannibalize reviews from the one that would come next simply by sitting on the nomination page for extended periods of time, and I look forward to your finding your feet as coordinator and helping to bring down these extended backlogs. All the best,--Wehwalt (talk) 08:34, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
- Looks fine to start a second one to me. Hoping to dig into promotions this week, if I can fight off the bug that the hubby brought home from work. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:50, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:50, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
It’s that time of year!
 Atsme Talk 📧 18:05, 13 December 2019 (UTC) |
Happy Holiday Cheer!! |
in the spirit of the season. What's especially nice about this digitized version: *it doesn't need water *won't catch fire *and batteries aren't required. |
and a prosperous New Year!! 🍸🎁 🎉 |
TPS...
If some of you could check on Rollo ... we seem to have someone determined to push... something ... combined with WP:CIR issues. Ealdgyth - Talk 13:35, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Season's Greetings
|
Season's Greetings | |
| Wishing you a Happy Holiday Season, and all best wishes for the New Year! Mystical Nativity (Filippo Lippi) is my Wiki-Christmas card to all for this year. Johnbod (talk) 16:39, 17 December 2019 (UTC) |
Cheers
|
Damon Runyon's short story "Dancing Dan's Christmas" is a fun read if you have the time. Right from the start it extols the virtues of the hot Tom and Jerry
No matter what concoction is your favorite to imbibe during this festive season I would like to toast you with it and to thank you for all your work here at the 'pedia this past year. Best wishes for your 2020 as well E. MarnetteD|Talk 21:13, 18 December 2019 (UTC) |
Merry Christmas!
| A very happy Christmas and New Year to you! | 
|
|
|
For lack of a natural science themed greetings...
.jpg)
.jpg)
Hello Ealdgyth: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 19:46, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
,_cropped.jpg)
- Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message
Season's Greetings
|
Season's Greetings | |
| May your Holidays and the Year that follows shine as much as this coin still does beneath the tarnish of bygone weather and long use. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 22:25, 20 December 2019 (UTC) |
Merry Christmas!!
.jpg)
Thank you very much Ealdgyth for your thoughtful greeting. You have my very best wishes for this holiday season. May your heart be filled with happiness during this special time.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Happy holidays
Hi Ealdgyth, many thanks for the card. All the best to you and yours for the holidays. Cheers, SarahSV (talk) 06:36, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Thanks
Ealdgyth, Waes hael - Drinc hael! Urselius (talk) 09:16, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Season's Greetings!
|
Faithful friends who are dear to us | |
| ... gather near to us once more. May your heart be light and your troubles out of sight, now and in the New Year. |
.jpg) |
A good holiday!
- My good comrade Ealdgyth! May the guiding and divining energy of the universe sustain you and yours, keep you safe and allow your eternal growth to prosper this year and for all time. With love and respect, Simon. Simon Adler (talk) 02:05, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Season's Greetings
.jpg)
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 00:57, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
- LOL FWiW Bzuk! Good to see Santa has a CAP. That made me smile! Regards, Simon. Simon Adler (talk) 02:35, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020! |
|
Hello Ealdgyth, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Anyone for an Archbishop of Canterbury?
Seasonal greetings, Ealdgyth! The 96th Archbishop of Canterbury is a few centuries late for your usual focus, but if you are interested I have his article up for peer review, if you care to look in. Quite understand if not, of course. Best wishes, Tim riley talk 21:04, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
Peace Dove
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:21, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
Happy New Year!
Thanks for the holiday greetings! Wishing you all the best for the New Year to come! Ruhrfisch ><>°° 21:17, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to the 2020 WikiCup!
Happy New Year, Happy New Decade and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders and improvers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. We are relaxing the rule that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2020 will count; now to be eligible for points in the competition, you must have completed significant work on the content at some time! Any questions on the rules or on anything else connected to the Cup should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:43, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Cultural depictions
Hi Ealdgyth. Happy New Year. Can you take a look at Talk:Ealhswith#"Unjustified?". Dudley Miles (talk) 11:39, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
- The relevant guideline is Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Trivia sections#"In popular culture" and "Cultural references" material and the RfC which closed with "The consensus is very clear that a secondary source is required in almost all cases. A tertiary source is even better, if available. In the rare case that a primary source is judged to be sufficient, it should be properly cited. The source(s) cited should not only establish the verifiability of the pop culture reference, but also its significance." ... so secondary sources discussing the cultural depiction are needed. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:14, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks. Dudley Miles (talk) 15:47, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2019).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment asks whether partial blocks should be enabled on the English Wikipedia. If enabled, this functionality would allow administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces, rather than the entire site.
- A proposal asks whether admins who don't use their tools for a significant period of time (e.g. five years) should have the toolset procedurally removed.
- Following a successful RfC, a whitelist is now available for users whose redirects will be autopatrolled by a bot, removing them from the new pages patrol queue. Admins can add such users to Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Redirect whitelist after a discussion following the guidelines at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect whitelist.
Arbitration
- The fourth case on Palestine-Israel articles was closed. The case consolidated all previous remedies under one heading, which should make them easier to understand, apply, and enforce. In particular, the distinction between "primary articles" and "related content" has been clarified, with the former being
the entire set of articles whose topic relates to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly interpreted
rather thanreasonably construed
. - Following the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Beeblebrox, Bradv, Casliber, David Fuchs, DGG, KrakatoaKatie, Maxim, Newyorkbrad, SoWhy, Worm That Turned, Xeno.
- The fourth case on Palestine-Israel articles was closed. The case consolidated all previous remedies under one heading, which should make them easier to understand, apply, and enforce. In particular, the distinction between "primary articles" and "related content" has been clarified, with the former being
Miscellaneous
- This issue marks three full years of the Admin newsletter. Thanks for reading!
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:35, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
Happy Adminship Anniversary!
Have a very happy adminship anniversary on your special day!
Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 03:54, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:54, 23 January 2020 (UTC)
Oopsie
I think you may have mixed this up with the actual massacre article. This one is the video game. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 00:21, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
- Here is the discussion four years ago on a request to run this article on TFA. Brian got it right then. There is no way this article should run, especially on the anniversary of this horror. Kablammo (talk) 00:30, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
Once more, with feeling.
When you put your foot down, it really goes down and stays down, doesn't it? I'll wait, in awe, for the first person brave enough to underpost you on that FAC. Yomanganitalk 14:26, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
- I have been told I have been replaced as the badass of the internet! (On my way to see if I am brave enough to underpost at wherever this has happened!) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:40, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
- OK, I dared. Recognizing that some people disliked it (too bad), this is a perfect example of when the old "restart technique" was useful. The page is full of blather. Real improvements or criticisms are lost. Valid and invalid are blurred. You wipe the page clean, add at the top a diff to the old commentary, ping everyone back and tell them to give their opinion without rehashing. Pisses people off by lets them know they aren't going to continue this way, and rarely has to be used (eg, Catholic Church). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:46, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
- Alternately, if the "restart" still freaks people out, you move the whole review to the talk page of the FAC, add a diff of the move, and ping everyone back for a fresh start with a warning not to rehash. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:48, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
- That's a cop-out underpost, Sandy, I'm not counting that. Yomanganitalk 14:50, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
- Ha, don't tempt me ... if I wanted to be really bad ass, I'd go and do what I suggest Ealdgyth do :) But that would not be cool ... SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:52, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
- That's a cop-out underpost, Sandy, I'm not counting that. Yomanganitalk 14:50, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
- Alternately, if the "restart" still freaks people out, you move the whole review to the talk page of the FAC, add a diff of the move, and ping everyone back for a fresh start with a warning not to rehash. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:48, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
- OK, I dared. Recognizing that some people disliked it (too bad), this is a perfect example of when the old "restart technique" was useful. The page is full of blather. Real improvements or criticisms are lost. Valid and invalid are blurred. You wipe the page clean, add at the top a diff to the old commentary, ping everyone back and tell them to give their opinion without rehashing. Pisses people off by lets them know they aren't going to continue this way, and rarely has to be used (eg, Catholic Church). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:46, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
- I have been told I have been replaced as the badass of the internet! (On my way to see if I am brave enough to underpost at wherever this has happened!) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:40, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
- The problem with the "restart" is that there is only one review that is open. Everyone else has done their review and supported, and they were all after F&F's oppose. There seems little benefit in restarting 11 completed and supporting reviews just for the one that is still open. - SchroCat (talk) 15:19, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
- Schro, a page with 11 supports, followed by one open review is much clearer, cleaner, easier for the coords to process, and makes a strong impact :) As well as sending a strong message about acceptable reviews at FAC. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:22, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
- Possibly - but it does waste the time and goodwill of the eleven editors who have already supported.
- You are right to say that, in that one open review, valid and invalid points are blurred, some dealt with, others possibly lost in the noise. This is why I put in a request to the co-ords to clarify what, in their opinion and in line with the FA criteria, actually needs addressing (and stylistic points on use of "career" and "profession" don't, as far as I am concered). That was only requested earlier today, and Ealdgyth has referred to that process in her post, so hopefully there will be some resolution of some areas before long. - SchroCat (talk) 15:29, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
- (ec X2) Folks, can we NOT fuel further discussion in yet other places. I'm WORKING on it. But .. yes, it needs to be handled with some care and I'm not in a place where typing is easy. A nice quiet cool down on all "sides" would be appreciated, not a further rehashing of the situation all over the place. That isn't going to help calm the waters, which is what I would like, thank you. Did I mention it's been a shitty ass week? Had to put down a horse Sunday ... while I was on the road with hubby, so son had to deal with that. And hubby's work has screwed up his payroll to hell and back so THAT's stressful. And (petty but important to dealing with Wiki) the ergonomic keyboard I brought along for the road trip has developed a glitch and isn't working any longer so I'm working on a "standard" keyboard for the first time in 35 years. One reason I don't have carpal tunnel after all the years working as a person who spends ages on the computer is that I've religiously used ergonomic keyboards ... which means my typo rate on a non-ergonomic is through the roof. Still trying to find a way to dispose of the horse ... it's winter in Wisconsin and yeah... we'd like to bury him on the property (I'm still tearing up at losing him) but finding a way to do that is ... difficult. The FAC is on my plate, I'll have something up reasonably soon. No, its not likely to be a restart - I'm a bit more "proactive" than that in my approach to FAC - i lean a bit more towards throwing my "weight" around some and in this situation, the second FAC was pretty much a restart in all but name, honestly. Doesn't seem to have worked, so we'll try something else. Ealdgyth - Talk 15:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
- Hi Ealdgyth, Sounds like a shitty week, and I'm sorry this adds to it. I didn't mean this to be a 'further discussion' set of comments - just a bit by way of clarification to SG. You are right to say that this FAC was a restart: I meant it as such to force a separation in the original break in communications in the hope that this second one would be different; you're right: that didn't work either. I hope your week improves - there's no rush from my side: I've already said I'll sit out on dealing with review comments until the weekend just so it's not a question of rehashing the same points yet again, so whenever you're ready is fine with me. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 15:39, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
- Oh, Ealdgyth, I am so so sorry about your horse :( :( Having dealt with burying horses, and having buried a 5-lb Yorkie in the winter with the ground frozen, I can only imagine how you feel not only about losing the horse, but about having to find a means of burial. So sorry :( I will stay out (couldn't resist the temptation from Yoman, but sorry to make things harder :) Since no one has responded to my post at the FAC, I shall go remove it. Best, SandyGeorgia (Talk)
- Too late. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:42, 28 January 2020 (UTC)