User talk:Jpop73

could someone help fix spelling of the name --should be "Riordan" thanks`Jpop73 (talk) 03:08, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Jpop73, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Rosiestep (talk) 02:30, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for sharing.

It is much appreciated! I will check them out. Jpop73 (talk) 19:46, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Got questions? The Teahouse has answers!

Hello! Jpop73, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse, an awesome place to meet people, ask questions (such as how to upload images), and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! --Rosiestep (talk) 02:25, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you!```` Jpop73 (talk) 02:57, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at List of Playboy Playmates of 1992. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Man way 04:42, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, a source provided me with first hand information. Jpop73 (talk) 04:47, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's ok. First hand sources are called "Original Research" around here and is not allowed. WP:NOR Glad you're willing to discuss. Hope you enjoy Wikipedia. Might want to take some time and poke around in our policies so we can avoid this next time. Thanks and regards, --Man way 04:51, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

sure---wont happen again. Jpop73 (talk) 05:07, 8 October 2013 (UTC) Manway can we salvage any any of the edits I made this evening that were sourced, like the photos etc and text on animal training? thanks Jpop73 (talk) 05:18, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Manway way, I went back and added new citations for animal training and put back in the academic posts, but I did not disturb the Suzi Simpson info.thanksJpop73 (talk) 06:12, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Headshot of Michael Hutchins.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Headshot of Michael Hutchins.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 12:36, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I accidentally classified this photo incorrectly. It is for public consumption and freeJpop73 (talk) 15:43, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Suzi Simpson head shot.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Suzi Simpson head shot.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Blurred Lines 17:00, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Headshot of Michael Hutchins.jpg

How do I put a label to block this page. It has been tampered with and negative comments have been added that are unsubstatiated ````

Thanks for uploading File:Headshot of Michael Hutchins.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Blurred Lines 17:59, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jordan Schaul (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Conservationist

Michael Hutchins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Conservationist

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure I follow but please remove conservationist if neccessaryJpop73 (talk) 13:21, 9 October 2013 (UTC) I still need to figure this outJpop73 (talk) 20:44, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Jschaulblackbrownbears.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jschaulblackbrownbears.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:27, 15 October 2013 (UTC) thanks. working on fixingJpop73 (talk) 17:22, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Training Kodiak bears.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Training Kodiak bears.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Super Mario Man 00:32, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

thank you, should i delete themJpop73 (talk) 01:32, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your comment: in that case, the image may be less replaceable than I first thought. Fair-use images of people and animals can usually be replaced with free alternatives, but if the bear species isn't common in this type of environment an administrator may decide to keep this particular image. You could make a case for retention using Template:Di-replaceable fair use disputed, or editing the talk page. I'm not sure what your reply above is referring to, but I can see no problems with the other images that you have uploaded, except those that other users have already tagged. WP:OTRS confirmation for your free uploads should come through in due course. Super Mario Man 02:48, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you..Jpop73 (talk)`

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jordan Schaul (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Richard Ellis and William Conway

Michael Hutchins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to William Conway

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 16 October 2013 (UTC) thanks i tried to change to Richard Ellis (biologist)Someone in the field of conservation biology and William G. Conway, but it wouldn't save (Jpop73 (talk) 16:15, 16 October 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Michaeletalwjane.png

A tag has been placed on File:Michaeletalwjane.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Blurred Lines 17:46, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:JCSchaul headshot.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:JCSchaul headshot.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:18, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Profile of jordan carlton Schaul.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Profile of jordan carlton Schaul.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:46, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I hereby affirm that CHOOSE ONE: [I, (), am] OR [(Jordan Schaul) is] the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of [the profile photo ]

I agree to STANDARD CHOICE; SEE BELOW FOR MORE INFORMATION ON TYPE OF LICENSE: [publish that work under the free license "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported" and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts).]

File permission problem with File:On Today Show.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:On Today Show.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:06, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Picture of Suzi.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Picture of Suzi.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:11, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013

Hello Jpop73, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:12, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Suzi Singstock

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Suzi Singstock, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://forum.burek.com/suzi-simpson-t202991.wap2.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 02:31, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Michael with Jane Alexander.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Michael with Jane Alexander.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:54, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:MHutchins with bat.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MHutchins with bat.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:55, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:With koala.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:With koala.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:55, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mhutchins with JC.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mhutchins with JC.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:55, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jschaul w elephant.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jschaul w elephant.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:55, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jordan collage.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jordan collage.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:55, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jordancschaul headshot.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jordancschaul headshot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:58, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mike w animal.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mike w animal.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:58, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mieshellecat 2.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mieshellecat 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:58, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jordan Schaul & Jack Hanna.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jordan Schaul & Jack Hanna.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:58, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jordan Schaul.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jordan Schaul.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 21:59, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jschaulblackbrownbears.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jschaulblackbrownbears.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 22:31, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sal LaBarbera, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages National Geographic and Discovery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:06, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sorry about the disambiguationJpop73 (talk) 20:12, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Melanie Marden, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mutant X (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ron Smalstig

Hello, Jpop73. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Ron Smalstig, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ad Orientem (talk) 23:00, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kimberly Foss

A tag has been placed on Kimberly Foss requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 04:04, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kimberly Foss, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Today Show (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Grey Stafford (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Blackfish

William Hurley IV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Blackfish

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree files

Some files that you uploaded or altered have been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:13, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Empyrion Wealth Management

A tag has been placed on Empyrion Wealth Management requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 03:20, 1 March 2014 (UTC) could use some help with redirection problem on Ben Sutton, Jr.Jpop73 (talk) 19:09, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ben Sutton, Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IMG (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ben Sutton, Jr

Hello, Jpop73, and thank you for your contributions!

Some text in an article that you worked on Ben Sutton, Jr, appears to be directly copied from another Wikipedia article, Ben Sutton, Jr.. Please take a minute to double-check that you've properly attributed the source text in your edit summary.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Ben Sutton, Jr at any time. MadmanBot (talk) 18:42, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree files

Some of the files that you have uploaded may be unfree. See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 March 8#OTRS pending since January for details. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:44, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ben Sutton, Jr (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to IMG

John E. Michel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Air University

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relocating articles

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable for a number of reasons - it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution, and it creates article "forks", where we have two articles on the same subject. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Ben Sutton, Jr has been deleted, because it was a copy of Ben Sutton, Jr. Ff there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 01:21, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Kodiak bear training with Dr. Jordan Schaul.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kodiak bear training with Dr. Jordan Schaul.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:35, 22 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

I understand you've only been here since October, but I need to ask you to please adhere to Wikipedia standards of encyclopedic WP:TONE. I've run across several of your edits that read like fannish, fawning WP:PUFFERY and non-neutral essaying. Many of your edits also take an inappropriately conversational tone about "Ken" or "John" doing great things. If you need help in adopting a more formal, less fannish writing style, I'm glad to help. --Tenebrae (talk) 16:02, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jpop. The first thing I would do is have you read the brief, handy guide The Five Pillars of Wikipedia and the guideline at WP:TONE. Let's start with that, and ask me any questions you might have afterward. We all have a learning curve — it takes a while to get the hang of it. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:09, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

One quick thing: We use last names only after the first full mention of the subject's name at the start of the article. We don't use the conversational first name, like "Jordan" at Jordan Schaul.

Also, unless it's a proper noun, we only capitalize the first word of a subhead. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:11, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I've noticed you use raw URLs for footnoted citations. First, i'm glad to see your copious use of citations — that's extremely important and I;m glad you have that down. What we need to do is have you convert those raw URLs to proper citation format. Fortunately, we have ready-made templates to make it fairly easy for us. You can read up on that at Wikipedia:Citation templates

This might seem like a lot to take in at once, so relax and take your time. There's no deadline! --Tenebrae (talk) 21:28, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of John E. Michel

Hello Jpop73,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged John E. Michel for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. valereee (talk) 19:07, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:WesternWildlifeOutreachLogo.png

A tag has been placed on File:WesternWildlifeOutreachLogo.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 11:04, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Western Wildlife Outreach, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Morgan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Jordan Schaul photo one.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jordan Schaul photo one.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 01:21, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Treating the article like your resume

You have added a HOST of uncited OR personal claims, you removed tags and did much more to once agin make your page blurby and promotional. If you continue to treat your Wikipedia page as your resume, I'm going asking an admin to topic-ban you from that page. --Tenebrae (talk) 08:37, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What can be done to comply with your wishes and to remove the tag. May I give you more referenced material? Thank you. --Jpop73

This page indicates that the topic graduated with a PhD from the Ohio State University and was a DVM student http://voices.nationalgeographic.com/author/jschaul/ as does this http://www.cvma.net/images/cvmapdf/WUMorishita.pdf http://www.biodiversitygroup.org/about/board.html (this includes previous education BA and MS degrees)

--Jpop73

The cite http://voices.nationalgeographic.com/author/jschaul/ is already in the article and seems to confirm much of what needs confirmed, including where born and raised. National Geo is a generally an impeccable source. Yet that particular page may not be written by editorial staff — it's hard to tell, since it looks as if theNation Geo website just posted a CV without editorial oversight. Is that the case? --Tenebrae (talk) 00:16, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The bio is updated regularly and the CV is provided by the topic/subject. It is fact checked by the staff editors, however, as there was an issue with one of the subject's affiliations--- Conservation Science Institute, which was pulled as it was inadvertently linked to the Pew Charitable Trust when the CV was submitted 4 years ago. The CSI is a grant recipient of PCT funding, but it read on the CSI website as though the individuals were recipients and that was an inadvertent oversight by several people. Do you need scanned transcripts sent the verify the place of study. That can be arranged.

With due respect, I'm not sure you understand how verification for Wikipedia works. A friendly suggestion: Read WP:NOR, the policy regarding original research and scanned documents uploaded to self-published sites. In any case, if National Geo says somewhere that that page is fact-checked by staff editors, then it's useable. But I'm sure you can understand how we can't just take the word of an anonymous person here that it's fact-checked. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:27, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide an example of a page regarding biographical information on anyone in any popular web publication that says the information is fact checked? As I understand this, you are suggesting that every person with credentials from a degree granting institution should have their credentials removed from their biography as the information has not been verified. To whom and what email address can a National Geographic staff member send a verification notice to Wikipedia confirming the information for the subject/topic? Furthermore, do I need to now pull information from other pages I created which do not specifically cite references verifying degree earned for individuals?

Journalistic interviews and articles in publications ranging from The New York Times to the Des Moines Register are good sources of biographical information. Pages that are obviously supplied by the subject, like speaker-bureau biographies, are not.

RE: "do I need to now pull information from other pages I created which do not specifically cite references verifying degree earned for individuals?" The answer is: Absolutely. Making unverified claims of supposed educational credits is extremely irresponsible and a direct violation of Wikipedia policy on biographies of living persons.--Tenebrae (talk) 01:00, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. But where in the NY Times, for example, does it say that the editors fact checked a specific biography? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpop73 (talk • contribs)

I don't even know how to answer that question, and it sounds as if you're being disingenuous if you truly believe The New York Times doesn't fact-check journalistic stories. The only other types of biographies I know of on the paper's website are film/TV-related content that the website syndicates from AllMovie / Rovi, which takes responsibility for its content.

This article may be better off if the subject himself were not trying to use it for his own purposes. It's disrespectful to the idea of a neutral and objective encyclopedia, and it's distasteful to see someone using Wikipedia for self-promotion. --Tenebrae (talk) 03:10, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The tag that you added asks for help in improving the article, which is what I am trying to accomplish. Hence, I'm asking for help or suggestions for how to add neutrality and objectivity to the article. What specifically is biased or subjective that you would like removed from the article and I will try my best to fix it? In addition, you say that the New York Times fact checks stories and you are making as assumption that National Geographic editors don't. So far, based on your response, we don't have proof either way. Like I said, I can bring this to the attention of National Geographic, if you provide me with an email address to correspond with so that I can send you the response from them. Again, I don't think the issue is about what I believe, but as you even indicated, what is verifiable and what is not. I'm trying to comply with your wishes and I would appreciate some fairness. I thought that this editorial oversight was intended to make the article better and not about passing judgement on the suspected intentions of anyone. I'm trying to make the article less promotional and I would appreciate some specific directives so that I can improve this article and others that I have created. Thank you.

It's clear you haven't read WP:BLP or WP:VERIFY or you would know that personal email between editors is in no way, shape or form the kind of publicly accessible reliable source that Wikipedia requires. As for the other matter, please read WP:COI.

The National Geo page has no byline. It's clearly your resume. If you can't find sources other than your resume to support claims in the article, that should be a red flag.--Tenebrae (talk) 23:25, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Everything was cited with reference to websites from academic appointments to board service. Some activities may have been for a finite period of time, but regardless, your condescension is not appreciated. You may know Wikipedia policy, but it seems you are clearly unaware of academic policy. You can't get an academic appointment without having a CV (resume) reviewed. If you see your role as editor here to be one of helping contributors, you missed the boat. You obviously have no interest in really helping to improve the article, or protecting the integrity of Wikipedia; it appears you are simply on a "power trip" trying to give people a difficult time. Hence, this is a waste of energy and a negative experience. It is also disappointing to learn that a so called Wikipedia "Editor" is the one with the subjective bias. I have enjoyed contributing to Wikipedia, but this correspondence has been perhaps the least constructive of discussions, I have had in recent time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpop73 (talk • contribs)

Please sign your posts, please indent your posts, and please familiarize yourself with the Wikipedia policies and guidelines to which I have repeatedly have linked for your perusal. If you cannot read much less follow these policies and guidelines, it is hard to say how any discussion can be constructive.

Your ability to get an academic appointment has nothing to do with Wikipedia, and using Wikipedia as a promotional vehicle for yourself is antithetical to this altruistic free encyclopedia's mission. Additionally, your false and gratuitously personal allegations violate good-faith and civility guidelines. If you cannot find objective, third-party verification of particular claims and instead rely on user-generated content supplied to a magazine, you are violating Wikipedia policies. It has nothing to do me or any other editor if you cannot follow policies and guidelines. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:01, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The subject already has the academic appointments. Clearly you haven't even reviewed the biography that you claim is unreferenced by third parties. Please read the biography. The point that I was making was that the the subject's CV was obviously fact checked not only by National Geographic, but by academic institutions for which they serve as a faculty member, which counters your argument. Since you seem to know so much about Wikipedia policy, please advise me as to where I can submit a grievance over your conduct and your allegations that the subject is using anything for promotional purposes. What is antiethical is your disregard for a contributor's effort to follow Wikipedia policies and your continued unwillingness to help them improve the article even when specific citations of a third party nature have been provided. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpop73 (talk • contribs)

There is nothing obvious or even indicative that the National Geographic page you note is part of the magazine's editorial-staff purview. Many magazines, even those as illustrious as Forbes, have user-generated content on their websites. And a non-bylined resume that is clearly not an article throws a red flag. You even concede above, in this discussion, that the content in question is user-generated: "The bio is updated regularly and the CV is provided by the topic/subject."

You can look up procedures for mediation, arbitration and much else. Though I would caution that admins, who can track IP addresses to, say, educational institutions, take a dim view of WP:COI editing. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:37, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Biodiversity Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Biota. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gary Wilkes

A tag has been placed on Gary Wilkes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 21:52, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gary Wilkes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gary Wilkes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gary Wilkes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 22:55, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jordan Schaul 2

In answer to your question: I don't know where to begin. You seem to have a determination not to learn the core Wikipedia policies or even proper footnoting. We do not give uncited birth dates of living people — the Cleveland Jewish News did not give a birth date, and it also doesn't say Schaul was born in Shaker Heights -- calling someone a "native" can mean either that they were born there or raised there. We don't remove the tag "vague" without clarifying, and "with a degree in biology-psychology" is vague. Which is it? A degree in biology? A degree in psychology? Is this some exotic major called "biology-psychology"?

Wikipedia disallows wikia and other sites of user-generated content, since who knows how reliable any of it is?

You moved a cited fact away from its citation and placed it in a section cited by another source which doesn't mention it at all. And you added an uncited adjunct professorship. And a rawl-URL citatation.

I'm not even going into your apparent refusal to learn basic Manual of Style things, like using the numeral in dates rather than the ordinal, and not using abbreviations of place names like "Hts" for "Heights."

Can you even count the number of policy and MOS violations I've taken the time to explain (a lot of it not for the first time)? I'm not required to go over all these things with you: Each of us on Wikipedia is expected to learn at the very least the Five Pillars of Wikipedia and the basic of footnoting and MOS. Yet I have tried and tried since at least 21:28, 25 March 2014. Go back and read my friendly post to you then. But after all these months — and I spent 11 days with you in November about all this — and your apparent obstinacy over learning the basics has worn me out. I cannot keep explaining. When you make inappropriate edits and I or another editor remove them, show good faith that we have our reasons and aren't taking 20 minutes to write them all down for you as I've done here now. --Tenebrae (talk) 23:36, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear (talk) 23:36, 26 February 2015 (UTC) That is fair, I appreciate the thoroughness, but yes that is the name of the degree biology-psychology (not biological psychology or Psychological biology. The subject was an adjunct as was shown on the website for UofA (it was a citation at one time), but is no longer serving in that capacity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpop73 (talk • contribs) 05:59, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi --Tenebrae. I apologize for the recent additions. Can you specify what you want me to take out, including contentious material? I see what you meant by the placement of the tag. I removed the items that I think you were referring to and I hope it was ok to remove the tag. Im not sure i got the contentious material, though? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpop73 (talk • contribs) 01:42, 16 January 2016‎

You did exactly right, removing the tag after deleting the tagged material. I'm sure the content was accurate and that you'll find a third-party source. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:51, 19 January 2016 (UTC) Thanks, I'm a slow learner as you know, but I'm trying to follow policy. I'm the type who has a great trouble reading manuals and the like. I do get ahead of myself but I don't intentionally try not to follow protocol. And came across the live help chat, which has been helpful as well. thanksJpop73 (talk) 22:52, 19 January 2016 (UTC) Hi Tenebrae --Tenebrae, I deleted the personal life commentary on the page because I realized that mention of Aspergers' could be defamatory, as someone pointed out to me and I noted that in the edits. I hope that is OK. Please let me know. ThanksJpop73 (talk) 22:49, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Coe Lewis

The article Coe Lewis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable DJ lacking non-trivial support.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 00:10, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Coe Lewis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coe Lewis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coe Lewis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 00:32, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nsefu Wildlife Conservation Foundation

A tag has been placed on Nsefu Wildlife Conservation Foundation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 01:50, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coe Lewis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jewel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nsefu Wildlife Conservation Foundation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nsefu Wildlife Conservation Foundation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nsefu Wildlife Conservation Foundation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 15:46, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Logo for NWCF.png

A tag has been placed on File:Logo for NWCF.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.nsefuwildlife.com/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 15:51, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jordan Schaul, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Columbus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Coe Lewis

Hi, Jpop. I honestly can't imagine why she would be deleted — The Bob and Coe Show is on KGB-FM, probably one of the top 4o or 50 stations in the US in terms of market reach, and she has 6,600 Google hits including papers like the San Diego Reader. If things were cited, and you seem to have that part down, my guess — and this is only a guess — is that the WP:TONE might have seemed promotional or that the cites were raw URLs and not formatted.

My suggestion is: You can create a page from your user page called Jpop/Sandbox, in which you can recreate the article without posting it formally to Wikipedia, and invite other editors to come by and offer suggestions and comments. I and I'm sure others would be glad to help. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:37, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I've just seen Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coe Lewis. I'm not sure why only 15 Google hits came up — I mean, I can see there were limiters installed in the search, but I don't know why — but I found more. I've never heard that someone has to be nationally known to be in Wikipedia — the mayor of, say, Minneapolis isn't nationally known — so I'm not sure that was a valid reason. I still think creating a draft in a sandbox is a good next step. --Tenebrae (talk) 14:40, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

thank you, will doJpop73 (talk) 17:09, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo for NWCF.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo for NWCF.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rachel Reenstra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conservationist. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Minnesota Public Radio

Maybe I can help. What do you mean "was quoted"? Like a transcript of a radio interview? --Tenebrae (talk) 15:57, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okey-doke. Unless you're thinking about using it to footnote something, we can add it as an External link. Let me know which and I can do it and walk you through it, although a deadline thing came up and I'll be off WIki for about 20 minutes.--Tenebrae (talk) 16:05, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'm back. --Tenebrae (talk) 16:37, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Just let know which you want to do, footnote or "External link", and I can do it and give you directions. It's pretty easy. --Tenebrae (talk) 20:32, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jpop. Y'know, it's not really something appropriate for an encyclopedia article &mash; the subject arguing pro or con something and urging people in one direction or another. But I would add the interview as an "External link," so that anyone who's interested can go to it. I'll start that section. As you'll see and can replicate, the section takes the same templates as footnotes do, only with a bullet at the beginning and no "ref" tags. --Tenebrae (talk) 00:27, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. This one was actually a bit more complicated than most. Instead of using the "cite news" template used for periodicals, or the "cite book" template, or the "cite web" template used for sites that don't fit into those two categories, we had to use "cite audio", since it's a radio interview. And because the subject's name is not part of the title, I added "(Interview)" to the "publisher=" field, before the name of the publisher (i.e., Minnesota Public Radio). I also found that Archive.org couldn't archive the audio, so I used the next-most-popular archiving website, Webcitation.org, where it worked.

I hope by looking at this EL example, plus reading the explanation above, that you'll be able to insert ELs into articles, and that by going to either of those archiving sites and following the pretty simple directions that you'll archive all footnotes and ELs that you add. One caution: Once you go beyond four to six ELs, you're in danger of linkfarming, which is frowned on. I'm here if you have any questions! --Tenebrae (talk) 00:38, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Skidmore College, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Geographic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jordan Schaul, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Geographic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi, Jpop. Since the page was deleted, there's no way to access it in order to tell what might have caused that. I looked on your sandbox to see if a version of it was there, though, and I can tell you right offhand that Pam Johnson-Bennett might also get deleted if you use IMDb and Amazon links as references; if you use WP:DATED terms like "currently"; and if it reads like a resume. Hope this helps. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:31, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Headshot of Amy Andersen.png

Thanks for uploading File:Headshot of Amy Andersen.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 20:43, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Jonathan Michaels, from its old location at User:Jpop73/sandbox. This is because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. xc/tlk 20:02, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, my talk page. I just received notice that the article was rejected because of the sources. Can you advise on this. The sources are 3rd party references, but they are pdf files. How do you handle scanned articles or pdf from printed news. Thanks- Jpop73 (talk) 22:44, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonathan Michaels (January 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was:

Please read wp:rs to understand what are considered appropriate sources. The company's web site and profiles on professional sites are not usable because those are not independent of the subject of the article. Basically, you do not have any sources here that would be acceptable based on the policy. You need to be looking for newspaper articles, magazine articles, etc.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jonathan Michaels and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 20:06, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonathan Michaels (January 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jonathan Michaels and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:41, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:A andersen image.png

Thanks for uploading File:A andersen image.png, which you've attributed to http://www.express.co.uk/life-style/life/449593/Meet-the-world-s-most-exclusive-matchmaker-elite-love-concierge-Amy-Andersen. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 19:55, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Jordan Carlton Schaul head shot.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Jordan Carlton Schaul head shot.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 19:56, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Jessica Denay

added links pointing to ET, Vanessa Williams and The Insider

Jefery Levy

added links pointing to Attorney and USC

Jon Birger

added links pointing to ABC and Red Herring

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:13, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eric M. Davis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eric M. Davis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric M. Davis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 21:03, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Donnie Park (talk) 19:33, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Inga Verbeeck for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Inga Verbeeck is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Inga Verbeeck until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SmartSE (talk) 12:34, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jordan Schaul for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jordan Schaul is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Schaul (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SmartSE (talk) 12:53, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Biodiversity Group

A tag has been placed on The Biodiversity Group, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SmartSE (talk) 14:32, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jessica Denay

The article Jessica Denay has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NAUTHOR due to reliance on own publishers and online blogs as sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Brianhe (talk) 16:22, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gretchen Hillmer Bonaduce

The article Gretchen Hillmer Bonaduce has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BIO due to sourcing to blogs and non-RS websites, only passing mention from LA Times.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Brianhe (talk) 19:05, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Linx Dating for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Linx Dating is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linx Dating until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:13, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amy Andersen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amy Andersen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Andersen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:14, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John E. Michel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John E. Michel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John E. Michel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:16, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eden Sassoon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eden Sassoon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eden Sassoon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:17, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sujoy Banerjee

A tag has been placed on Sujoy Banerjee, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:18, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Western Wildlife Outreach

The article Western Wildlife Outreach has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No in-depth coverage as is required to meet WP:ORG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SmartSE (talk) 22:09, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

jordan Schaul page

Hi, Jpop. I'm not sure, but I believe any editor can voluntarily pledge to topic-ban themselves from editing a particular article. I haven't run across this before, but you might try posting a query outlining your and the other editor's concerns at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. You might also make a case at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Schaul (2nd nomination) — and do feel free to mention that you've worked with me over the last year or two on trying to make the article read neutrally and encyclopedically, including with a Criticism section. (Since I've edited the article, I haven't weighed in on the deletion discussion. But I hope these two suggestions help._ --Tenebrae (talk) 03:13, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for your kind and prompt response. It is really very much appreciated!Jpop73 (talk) 04:19, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Amy Andersen

The article Amy Andersen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

zero notability.

paid editor. vanity article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 09:59, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eden Sassoon

The article Eden Sassoon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

obviously not notable.

paid editing. vanity article. zero notable content.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 10:05, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Biodiversity Group Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Biodiversity Group Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:08, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jessica Denay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jessica Denay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessica Denay until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SmartSE (talk) 18:01, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me knowJpop73 (talk) 18:59, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Western Wildlife Outreach for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Western Wildlife Outreach is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Western Wildlife Outreach until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SmartSE (talk) 07:36, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for sharingJpop73 (talk) 18:31, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kathy Riordin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kathy Riordin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathy Riordin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JohnInDC (talk) 19:12, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gretchen Hillmer Bonaduce for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gretchen Hillmer Bonaduce is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gretchen Hillmer Bonaduce until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donnie Park (talk) 17:05, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Suzi Singstock for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Suzi Singstock is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suzi Singstock until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donnie Park (talk) 21:19, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo of Linx Dating company.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Linx Dating company.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of William Hurley IV for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Hurley IV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Hurley IV until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donnie Park (talk) 22:40, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Awesome Ocean for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Awesome Ocean is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Awesome Ocean until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donnie Park (talk) 23:51, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sujoy Banerjee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sujoy Banerjee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sujoy Banerjee until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donnie Park (talk) 00:27, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Awesome ocean icon.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Awesome ocean icon.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —Cryptic 08:04, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Western Wildlife Logo 1.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Western Wildlife Logo 1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:58, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John Currie (athletic director)

According to Wikipedia's Terms of Use, you are required to add {{Connected contributor (paid)}} to the talk page of any article for which you have been paid to contribute. I would have done it for you, but I don't know if your employer for this article is Amy Andersen, Jon Birger or someone else. Please let me know if you need any help complying with our policies. Miniapolis 20:38, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Jessica Denay headshot.png

Hello, Jpop73. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Jessica Denay headshot.png — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brittney Hopper, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages KCBS and KCAL. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Christopher Judge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wilhelmina. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Megan Weaver, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Bravo and A&E. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jonathan Michaels

Hello, Jpop73. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Jonathan Michaels".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:10, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brittney Hopper, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carolyn Hennesy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Encino. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eden Sassoon

Speedy deletion nomination of Eden Sassoon

A tag has been placed on Eden Sassoon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Eustachiusz (talk) 13:34, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How is this a repeat the references are all brand new? jpop73'

Replaceable fair use File:Headshot of Robert Kovacik.png

Thanks for uploading File:Headshot of Robert Kovacik.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Majora (talk) 03:11, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disclosure update?

Hi, I noticed you have not updated the paid editing disclosure on your userpage since February. Are you forgetting to add anything? - Brianhe (talk) 04:57, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jpop73. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Head Shot of Dee Ocleppo.png

A tag has been placed on File:Head Shot of Dee Ocleppo.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Majora (talk) 22:26, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ohio's Most Notable Accredited Zoos

Hello Jpop73,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ohio's Most Notable Accredited Zoos for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

DrStrauss talk 12:31, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jordan Carlton Schaul

A tag has been placed on Jordan Carlton Schaul requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:02, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Donnie Park (talk) 20:48, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Jordan Carlton Schaul

A tag has been placed on Draft:Jordan Carlton Schaul, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Donnie Park (talk) 21:24, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello, I'm Donnie Park. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Jpop73 that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Donnie Park (talk) 01:20, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Donnie Park (talk) 01:42, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't call other users "nazis"—that's a personal attack and you only get one warning about that. And please don't make threat to dox and otherwise besmirch users elsewhere online. You get only one warning for doing that as well. El_C 02:24, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Donny Park, I've already forwarded screen shots to my attorney of this and your previous attempts to cyber bully me with your accusations. I've discussed your behavior with a FB administrator and they found you to be liable on numerous fronts and are looking in to it. I may not know the protocol for advancing a grievance against a Wikipedia editor through an official Wikipedia-vetted process, but you have repeatedly tried to harass me, make false claims and treat me with disrespect. As I mentioned, I was trying to find out how to translate my page so that I could do it for other people. And I deleted it knowing that there are Wikipedia editors out there who have nothing better to do than try to discredit a me, and quite frankly having a Wikipedia page of my own was more of problem than having one.

I'm told by this very same administrator that you and perhaps others have singled me out because I had a page/article on myself and it clearly irks other editors, if another editor is deemed more notable than they are. Rather than embrace people who might have interesting backgrounds, you choose to be threatened by them and create so much chaos and conflict that you certainly do a fantastic job of turning people away from joining the Wikipedia editorial community. There is no amount of money or recognition in the world that would entice someone to become a more regular contributor, given this kind of treatment.

Although the page was reviewed and approved numerous times you and your editor cronies went out of your way discredit myself and the page and several notable and distinguished people in different fields. Then I made the mistake of checking a box indicating that I was compensated for creating a page for someone else. In an effort to respect the integrity of the Wikipedia community and requests to divulge such information, I was met with a full-on effort to expunge my page and those of people I created. Now when I explain what happened to people who seek me out to help them with a page, they are quick to decline my offer to help. Academia is competitive and ruthless and political and this is ridiculous. You are going to go after me anyways, why not retain my attorney and why not publicize this treatment. I'd be receptive to your feedback as biased as it may be. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpop73 (talk • contribs) 03:06, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:32, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't request to be unblocked, but thanks for the kind offer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpop73 (talk • contribs) 03:36, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've no problem with empty legal threats like this but then you're not the first to issue me with such especially on Sunday. As with your "friends", whose problem is it when articles fail notability guidelines; maybe you and they should've thought this through better and but good luck anyways like I'm going to be intimidated by little man like you. Donnie Park (talk) 22:07, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christopher Jordan Judge for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christopher Jordan Judge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christopher Jordan Judge until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donnie Park (talk) 21:34, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cameron Judge for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cameron Judge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cameron Judge until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donnie Park (talk) 21:39, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jon Birger for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jon Birger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jon Birger until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donnie Park (talk) 21:48, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brittney Hopper for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brittney Hopper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brittney Hopper until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donnie Park (talk) 22:04, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at User_talk:Robert_McClenon#Question_about_MfD, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

I have since manually added your signature with the correct timestamp to the post, however, please do try and remember to sign posts that you make on talk pages. Of course, if this was just a one-off/mistake please disregard as we all make mistakes from time to time. AGF --TheSandDoctor (talk) 15:37, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sal LaBarbera for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sal LaBarbera is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sal LaBarbera until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Central and Adams (talk) 01:34, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]