2023 in science: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 397: Line 397:
* University press release: {{cite news |last1=Seltmann |first1=Stefanie |title=Intelligent brains take longer to solve difficult problems, shows simulation study |url=https://medicalxpress.com/news/2023-06-intelligent-brains-longer-difficult-problems.html |access-date=24 June 2023 |work=Berlin Institute of Health in der Charité via medicalxpress.com |language=en}}</ref>
* University press release: {{cite news |last1=Seltmann |first1=Stefanie |title=Intelligent brains take longer to solve difficult problems, shows simulation study |url=https://medicalxpress.com/news/2023-06-intelligent-brains-longer-difficult-problems.html |access-date=24 June 2023 |work=Berlin Institute of Health in der Charité via medicalxpress.com |language=en}}</ref>
**Researchers report trends in [[reason]]s for [[Human papillomavirus|HPV]] vaccine hesitancy during 2010–20.<ref>{{cite news |title=More Parents Citing Safety as Reason for HPV Vaccine Hesitancy - Physician's Weekly |url=https://www.physiciansweekly.com/more-parents-citing-safety-as-reason-for-hpv-vaccine-hesitancy/ |access-date=24 June 2023 |work=www.physiciansweekly.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Adjei Boakye |first1=Eric |last2=Nair |first2=Mrudula |last3=Abouelella |first3=Dina K |last4=Joseph |first4=Christine L.M. |last5=Gerend |first5=Mary A. |last6=Subramaniam |first6=Divya S. |last7=Osazuwa-Peters |first7=Nosayaba |title=Trends in Reasons for Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Hesitancy: 2010–2020 |journal=Pediatrics |date=1 June 2023 |volume=151 |issue=6 |doi=10.1542/peds.2022-060410}}</ref>
**Researchers report trends in [[reason]]s for [[Human papillomavirus|HPV]] vaccine hesitancy during 2010–20.<ref>{{cite news |title=More Parents Citing Safety as Reason for HPV Vaccine Hesitancy - Physician's Weekly |url=https://www.physiciansweekly.com/more-parents-citing-safety-as-reason-for-hpv-vaccine-hesitancy/ |access-date=24 June 2023 |work=www.physiciansweekly.com}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Adjei Boakye |first1=Eric |last2=Nair |first2=Mrudula |last3=Abouelella |first3=Dina K |last4=Joseph |first4=Christine L.M. |last5=Gerend |first5=Mary A. |last6=Subramaniam |first6=Divya S. |last7=Osazuwa-Peters |first7=Nosayaba |title=Trends in Reasons for Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Hesitancy: 2010–2020 |journal=Pediatrics |date=1 June 2023 |volume=151 |issue=6 |doi=10.1542/peds.2022-060410}}</ref>
*24 May
*24 May – Scientists demonstrate gene '[[FAAH]]'-related disruption via [[CRISPR gene editing|genetic]] or [[Epigenome editing#Functional engineering|epigenome editing]] for [[Pain management|pain insensitivity]] {{Crossreference|(see also [[January–March 2021 in science#March|10 March 2021]])}}. Their mainly [[long non-coding RNA]] 'FAAH-OUT'-related analyses, following from {{tooltip|decade-long study|Jo Cameron "was first referred to pain geneticists at UCL in 2013, after her doctor noticed that she experienced no pain after major surgeries on her hip and hand"}} of a woman who can't feel pain or anxiety, could also enable novel therapeutic developments against other neurological problems.<ref>{{cite news |title=Biological Secrets of the Woman Who Can't Feel Pain |url=https://www.usnews.com/news/health-news/articles/2023-05-24/biological-secrets-of-the-woman-who-cant-feel-pain |access-date=22 June 2023}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Mikaeili |first1=Hajar |last2=Habib |first2=Abdella M |last3=Yeung |first3=Charlix Wai-Lok |last4=Santana-Varela |first4=Sonia |last5=Luiz |first5=Ana P |last6=Panteleeva |first6=Kseniia |last7=Zuberi |first7=Sana |last8=Athanasiou-Fragkouli |first8=Alkyoni |last9=Houlden |first9=Henry |last10=Wood |first10=John N |last11=Okorokov |first11=Andrei L |last12=Cox |first12=James J |title=Molecular basis of FAAH-OUT -associated human pain insensitivity |journal=Brain |date=24 May 2023 |doi=10.1093/brain/awad098}}
**Scientists demonstrate gene '[[FAAH]]'-related disruption via [[CRISPR gene editing|genetic]] or [[Epigenome editing#Functional engineering|epigenome editing]] for [[Pain management|pain insensitivity]] {{Crossreference|(see also [[January–March 2021 in science#March|10 March 2021]])}}. Their mainly [[long non-coding RNA]] 'FAAH-OUT'-related analyses, following from {{tooltip|decade-long study|Jo Cameron "was first referred to pain geneticists at UCL in 2013, after her doctor noticed that she experienced no pain after major surgeries on her hip and hand"}} of a woman who can't feel pain or anxiety, could also enable novel therapeutic developments against other neurological problems.<ref>{{cite news |title=Biological Secrets of the Woman Who Can't Feel Pain |url=https://www.usnews.com/news/health-news/articles/2023-05-24/biological-secrets-of-the-woman-who-cant-feel-pain |access-date=22 June 2023}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Mikaeili |first1=Hajar |last2=Habib |first2=Abdella M |last3=Yeung |first3=Charlix Wai-Lok |last4=Santana-Varela |first4=Sonia |last5=Luiz |first5=Ana P |last6=Panteleeva |first6=Kseniia |last7=Zuberi |first7=Sana |last8=Athanasiou-Fragkouli |first8=Alkyoni |last9=Houlden |first9=Henry |last10=Wood |first10=John N |last11=Okorokov |first11=Andrei L |last12=Cox |first12=James J |title=Molecular basis of FAAH-OUT -associated human pain insensitivity |journal=Brain |date=24 May 2023 |doi=10.1093/brain/awad098}}
* University press release: {{cite news |title=Study reveals unique molecular machinery of woman who can’t feel pain |url=https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2023/may/study-reveals-unique-molecular-machinery-woman-who-cant-feel-pain |access-date=22 June 2023 |work=UCL News |date=24 May 2023 |language=en}}</ref>
* University press release: {{cite news |title=Study reveals unique molecular machinery of woman who can’t feel pain |url=https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2023/may/study-reveals-unique-molecular-machinery-woman-who-cant-feel-pain |access-date=22 June 2023 |work=UCL News |date=24 May 2023 |language=en}}</ref>
**One of the first empirical studies on what real users are shown during their typical use of popular [[Web search engine]]s interprets its results to show that choices for [[Misinformation|unreliable news sources]] for their [[Web query|queries]] are driven primarily by users' [[Decision-making|own choices]] and less by the engine's algorithms. The [[Web science|Web researchers]] link their findings to the concept of [[filter bubble]]s which emphasizes the role of design-<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Bozdag |first1=Engin |last2=van den Hoven |first2=Jeroen |title=Breaking the filter bubble: democracy and design |journal=Ethics and Information Technology |date=1 December 2015 |volume=17 |issue=4 |pages=249–265 |doi=10.1007/s10676-015-9380-y |language=en |issn=1572-8439}}</ref> and personalization algorithms.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Thompson |first1=Joanna |title=People, Not Google&rsquo;s Algorithm, Create Their Own Partisan &lsquo;Bubbles&rsquo; Online |url=https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/people-not-googles-algorithm-create-their-own-partisan-bubbles-online/ |access-date=26 June 2023 |work=Scientific American |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last1=Robertson |first1=Ronald E. |last2=Green |first2=Jon |last3=Ruck |first3=Damian J. |last4=Ognyanova |first4=Katherine |last5=Wilson |first5=Christo |last6=Lazer |first6=David |title=Users choose to engage with more partisan news than they are exposed to on Google Search |journal=Nature |date=June 2023 |volume=618 |issue=7964 |pages=342–348 |doi=10.1038/s41586-023-06078-5 |url=https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-023-06078-5.epdf?sharing_token=gQByIQpoXMHwwdvZYUHGk9RgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0MPFY_1GFjOSBxhgGUEsMAh5HHieLOmX7s3-K3njouvVVKAVd34PzwUkPyqViGzIu56RmElb5_TbAk7A1hvldej5dArOeDgXNLXocG2-5jRgCvs6mYRzhSZb_LKQ0eQZAQ%3D |language=en |issn=1476-4687}}</ref> On 2 May, a report accompanied by an [[open letter]] concludes that [[Alphabet Inc]], against its voluntary promises, still runs [[climate misinformation]] ads.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Grant |first1=Nico |last2=Myers |first2=Steven Lee |title=Google Promised to Defund Climate Lies, but the Ads Keep Coming |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/02/technology/google-youtube-disinformation-climate-change.html |access-date=28 May 2023 |work=The New York Times |date=2 May 2023}}</ref> Statements by Elon Musk{{better source needed|date=May 2023}} in 2022 suggest [[YouTube]] may also show ethically disputed [[online advertising|advertising]] other than science-related misinformation such as extensively showing "scam ads".<ref>{{cite news |title=YouTube accused of not tackling Musk Bitcoin scam streams |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-61749120 |access-date=28 May 2023 |work=BBC News |date=9 June 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Kay |first1=Grace |title=Elon Musk disses YouTube for 'nonstop scam ads' after threatening to walk away from Twitter purchase over bots |url=https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-criticizes-youtube-for-scam-ads-twitter-purchase-2022-6 |work=Business Insider}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Hsu |first1=Tiffany |title=Why Are You Seeing So Many Bad Digital Ads Now? |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2023/02/11/technology/bad-digital-ads.html |access-date=26 June 2023 |work=The New York Times |date=11 February 2023}}</ref>
*25 May
*25 May
**5,000 marine species new to science are discovered in the [[Clipperton Fracture Zone]], a proposed [[deep sea mining]] hotspot in the [[Pacific Ocean]].<ref>{{Cite news |date=25 May 2023 |title=Deep sea surveys detect over five thousand new species in future mining hotspot |work=EurekAlert!|url=https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/989689 |access-date=25 May 2023}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=25 May 2023 |title=Meet the 'gummy squirrel' and thousands of other newly discovered deep-sea species – in pictures |work=The Guardian|url=https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/gallery/2023/may/25/meet-the-gummy-squirrel-and-thousands-of-other-newly-discovered-deep-sea-species-in-pictures |access-date=25 May 2023}}</ref>
**5,000 marine species new to science are discovered in the [[Clipperton Fracture Zone]], a proposed [[deep sea mining]] hotspot in the [[Pacific Ocean]].<ref>{{Cite news |date=25 May 2023 |title=Deep sea surveys detect over five thousand new species in future mining hotspot |work=EurekAlert!|url=https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/989689 |access-date=25 May 2023}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news |date=25 May 2023 |title=Meet the 'gummy squirrel' and thousands of other newly discovered deep-sea species – in pictures |work=The Guardian|url=https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/gallery/2023/may/25/meet-the-gummy-squirrel-and-thousands-of-other-newly-discovered-deep-sea-species-in-pictures |access-date=25 May 2023}}</ref>

Revision as of 16:03, 26 June 2023

List of years in science (table)
+...

The following scientific events occurred or are scheduled to occur in 2023.

Events

January

  • 3 January – Researchers report molecular mechanisms that appear to underlie some of the reported health benefits of periods of intermittent fasting: changes to gene expression or rhythmicity of ~80% of all mouse genes in at least one tissue.[1][2]
4 January: A metascience study delivers various insights and theories about the growth, practices, and changes of science overall from citation analysis of a large corpus of scientific papers.
5 January: Archaeologists report that notational signs from ~37,000 years ago in caves, apparently conveying calendaric meaning about the behaviour of animal species drawn next to them, are the first known (proto-)writing in history.
6 January: A study concludes that retroviruses in the human genomes can become awakened from dormant states and contribute to aging which can be blocked by neutralizing antibodies.

February

6 February: A previously unknown cell mechanism explains how cells 'remember' their identity when they divide.
8 February: The dwarf planet Quaoar is found to have a ring system.
9 February: Safety-by-design ways like DNA screening for biosafety and biosecurity to prevent engineered pandemics
9 February: Results of the first longevity caloric restriction (CR) trial, CALERIE
15 February: Cosmologists report results that suggest black holes are the astrophysical origin of dark energy.
28 February: Scientists coin and outline a new field called 'organoid intelligence' (OI).

March

14 March: Launch of GPT-4, an artificial intelligence software able to generate human-like text.
15 March: Evidence of active volcanism on Venus is presented.
16 March: A global rise[image needed] of high-risk pathogen labs raises pandemic prevention concerns.
20 March: The concluding synthesis of the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report is published.[image needed]

April

12 April: Researchers demonstrate an 'AI scientist' that can rediscover physical laws from axioms and data.
14 April: Launch of the JUICE mission to Jupiter.
Image version of this section

May

8 May: Infrared view of three asteroid belts around the star Fomalhaut.
25 May: Artificial intelligence is reported to have designed a new antibiotic, effective against Acinetobacter baumannii (pictured).

June

Predicted and scheduled events

Astronomical events

Awards

Deaths

See also

References

Template:Reflist

External links

Template:Portal bar Template:2020s