Ba'ath Party

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Ba'ath)
Jump to: navigation, search
Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party
حزب البعث العربي الاشتراكي
Founder Michel Aflaq, Salah al-Din al-Bitar and Zaki al-Arsuzi (1947)
Aflaq, al-Bitar and Akram al-Hawrani (1952)
Slogan "Unity, liberty, socialism"
"One Nation, Bearing an Eternal Message"
Founded 7 April 1947 (7 April 1947)
Dissolved February 1966 (February 1966)
Preceded by Arab Ba'ath and Arab Ba'ath Movement (1947)
Arab Socialist Movement (1952)
Succeeded by Split into two factions: the Iraqi-led Ba'ath faction and the Syrian-led Ba'ath faction
Newspaper Al-Ba'ath
Ideology Ba'athism
International affiliation None
Official colors Black, Red, White and Green (Pan-Arab colors)

The Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party (Arabic: حزب البعث العربي الاشتراكي Hizb Al-Ba'ath Al-'Arabi Al-Ishtiraki‎) was a ba'athist political party mixing Arab nationalist and Arab socialist interests, opposed to Western imperialism, and calling for the renaissance or resurrection and unification of the Arab world into a single state. Ba'ath is also spelled Ba'th or Baath and means "rebirth," "resurrection," "restoration," or "renaissance" (reddyah). Its motto—"Unity, Liberty, Socialism" (wahda, hurriya, ishtirakiya)—refers to Arab unity, and freedom from non-Arab control and interference.

The party was founded by the merger of the Arab Ba'ath Movement, led by Michel Aflaq and Salah al-Din al-Bitar, and the Arab Ba'ath, led by Zaki al-Arsuzi, on 7 April 1947 as the Arab Ba'ath Party. It has established branches in different Arab countries, although it has only ever held power in Syria and Iraq. In 1952 the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party was established by a merger of the Arab Socialist Party led by Akram al-Hawrani and the Arab Ba'ath Party. In Syria it has had a monopoly on political power since the party's 1963 coup. Ba'athists also seized power in Iraq in 1963, but were deposed some months later. They returned to power in a 1968 coup and remained the sole party of government until the 2003 Iraq invasion. Since the invasion the party has been banned in Iraq.

In 1966 a coup d'état by the military against the historical leadership of Aflaq and Bitar led the Syrian and Iraqi parties to split into rival organizations—the Qotri (or regionalist) Syria-based party and the Qawmi (or nationalist) Iraq-based party.[1] Both retained the Ba'ath name and parallel structures within the Arab world, but hostilities between them grew to the point that the Syrian Ba'ath became the only Arab government to support Iran (a non-Arabic nation) against Iraq during the First Persian Gulf War.

Contents

[edit] Ideology

The motto "Unity, Liberty, Socialism" (Arabic: وحدة، حرية، اشتراكية Wahdah, Hurriyah, Ishtirakiyah) was inspired by the French Jacobin political doctrine linking national unity and social equity.[2] Unity refers to Arab unity, or Pan-Arabism; liberty emphasizes freedom from foreign control and interference (self-determination); socialism refers to Arab socialism, rather than to European socialism or communism. The idea that national freedom and the glory of the Arab Nation had been destroyed by Ottoman and Western imperialism was expounded in Michel Aflaq’s works On the Way of Resurrection and The Battle for One Destiny. Aflaq is commonly considered to be the father of Ba'athism.

Arab nationalism was influenced by 19th Century mainland European thinkers, notably conservative German philosophers such as Johann Gottlieb Fichte of the Königsberg University Kantian school,[3] and French Positivists such as Auguste Comte and professor Ernest Renan of the Collège de France in Paris.[4] Ba'ath party co-founders Aflaq and Salah al-Bitar both studied at the Sorbonne in the early 1930s when Positivism was still the dominant ideology among France’s academic elite.

The Kulturnation concept of Johann Gottfried Herder and the Grimm Brothers also had an impact. Kulturnation defines a nationality by its common cultural traditions and popular folklore, rather than by national, political, or religious boundaries. It was considered by some[who?] to be more suitable for German, Arab, Ottoman and Turkic countries.

Germany was seen as an anti-colonial power and friend of the Arab world; cultural and economic exchange and infrastructure projects such as the Baghdad Railway supported that impression. According to Paul Berman, early Arab nationalist thinker Sati' al-Husri was influenced by Fichte, a German philosopher famous for his conception of the nation-state and his influence on the German unification movement.

The Ba'ath party had a significant number of Christian Arabs among its founding members. For them, especially Aflaq, a resolutely nationalist and secular political framework was a way to evade faith-based Islamic orientation, prevent the marginalization of non-Muslims, and get full acknowledgment as citizens. During General Rashid Ali al-Gaylani's short-lived anti-British military coup in 1941, Iraq-based Arab nationalists (Sunni Muslims as well as Chaldean Christians) asked the Nazi German government to support them against British colonial rule.

[edit] Structure

The Ba'ath Party was created at the Second National Congress as a cell-based organisation, with an emphasis on withstanding government repression and infiltration. Hierarchical lines of command ran from top to bottom, and members were forbidden to initiate contacts between groups on the same level of the organisation—all contacts had to pass through a higher command level. This made the party somewhat unwieldy, but helped prevent the formation of factions and cordoned off members from each other. The party was difficult to infiltrate, because members did not know the identity of many other Ba'athists.

From its lowest organizational level (the cell) to the highest (the National Command), the party was structured as follows:

  • The Cell or Circle, composed of three to seven members, constituted the basic organisational unit of the Ba'ath Party.[5] There were two sorts of Cells: Member Cells and Supporter Cells. The latter consisted of candidate members, who were being gradually introduced into Party work without being granted membership privileges or knowledge of the party apparatus. At the same time, they were expected to follow all orders passed down by the full member that acted as the contact for their Cell. This served to prevent infiltration and to train and screen Party cadres. Cells functioned at the neighborhood, workplace, or village level, where members met to discuss and execute party directives introduced from above.
  • A Division comprised two to seven Cells, controlled by a Division Commander.[5] Such Ba'athist groups occurred throughout the bureaucracy and the military. They functioned as the Party’s watchdog and were an effective form of covert surveillance within a public administration.[6]
  • A Section, which comprised two to five Divisions, functioned at the level of a large city quarter, a town, or a rural district.[5]
  • The Branch came above the Sections; it comprised at least two sections, and operated at the provincial level.[6]
  • The Regional Congress, which combined all the branches, was set up to elect the Regional Command as the core of the Party leadership and top decision-making mechanism.[5] A "Region" (quṭr), in Ba'athist parlance, is an Arab state such as Syria, Iraq, or Lebanon. The term region reflected the Party's refusal to acknowledge them as separate nation-states.[6]
  • The National Command ranked over the Regional Commands.[5] Until the 1960s, it formed the highest policy-making and coordinating council for the Ba'ath movement throughout the Arab world, in both theory and practice. However, since 1966 when the Iraqi and Syrian Regional Commands entered into conflict and set up puppet National Commands, there have existed two rival National Commands. These are largely ceremonial, and were formed in order to further their rival claims to represent the original party.

[edit] Founding and early years

The Ba'ath Party was founded in 7 April 1947 by Michel Aflaq (a Christian), Salah al-Din al-Bitar (a Sunni muslim) and Zaki al-Arsuzi (a Alawite). It was a merger of the Arab Ba'ath, founded and led by al-Arsuzi, and the Arab Ba'ath Movement, led by Aflaq and al-Bitar. The party initially worked as a vehicle for the national liberation movement against French rule of Syria and Lebanon. Soon after,[when?] the Ba'ath Party established itself as a critic of what they considered to be the ideological inefficiencies of old Syrian nationalism.[7] Pan-Arabism became popular among Arabs following the end of World War II.[8] Aflaq, the father of ba'athist ideology and a Christian, drew heavily from Islam and its values. For example, he wrote that the time of Muhammed represented the ideal Arab community, and claimed the Arabs had "fallen" under the rule of the Ottomans and the Europeans. The name Ba'ath and the party's programme called for Arab restoration through modernisation. The most important influence which Alfaq and al-Bitar brought back from Europe was socialism, albeit a unique socialism with Arab characteristics.[9]

The party was formally established at its founding congress under the name Arab Ba'ath Party. According to the congress, the party was "nationalist, populist, socialist, and revolutionary" and believed in the "unity and freedom of the Arab nation within its homeland." The party opposed the theory of class conflict, but supported the nationalisation of major industries, the unionisation of workers, land reform, and supported private inheritance and private property rights to some degree.[10] At first the party had about a hundred members, but that increased to 4,500 by the early 1950s. The majority of party members were either teachers or students. The Ba'ath Party merged with the Arab Socialist Party (ASP), led by Akram al-Hawrani, to establish the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party in Lebanon following Adib Shishakli's rise to power. The merger gave the ba'ath movement its first peasant constituency; the ASP's stronghold was Hama.[11] Most ASP members did not adhere to the merger and remained "passionately loyal to Hawrani's person."[12] The merger was so weak that the ASP's original infrastructure remained intact. However, with the rise of Gamal Abdel Nasser in Egypt and Arab nationalism, the Ba'ath Party grew rapidly. In 1955, the party decided to support Nasser and his pan-Arab policies.[12]

[edit] The Syrian Ba'ath Party organisation

[edit] Elections, the UAR and factionalism

Akram al-Hawrani (left) with Michel Aflaq as seen in 1957

Syrian politics took a dramatic turn in 1954 when the military government of Adib al-Shishakli was overthrown and the democratic system restored. The Ba'ath, now a large and popular organisation, won 15 out of 142 parliamentary seats in the Syrian election that year, becoming the second-largest party in parliament. The majority of the new members of parliament were independents. The Ba'ath Party was one of the most organised parties in parliament, rivaled only by the Syrian Communist Party (SCP) and the People's Party. Aside from the SCP, the Ba'ath Party was the only party able to organise mass protests among workers.[13] The party was supported by the intelligentsia due to their pro-Egyptian and anti-imperialist stance along with their avocation of social reform.[14] The Ba'ath faced considerable competition from ideological enemies, notably the Syrian Social Nationalist Party (SSNP), which supported the establishment of a Greater Syria. The Ba'ath Party's main adversary was the SCP, whose support for class struggle and internationalism was anathema to the Ba'ath.[15] In addition to parliamentary-level competition, all these parties (as well as Islamists) competed in street-level activity and sought to recruit support among the military.[16]

The assassination of Ba'athist colonel Adnan al-Malki by a member of the SSNP in April 1955 allowed the Ba'ath Party and its allies to launch a crackdown, thus eliminating one rival. Two years later, in 1957, the Ba'ath Party partnered with the SCP in order to weaken the power of Syria's conservative parties. However, by the end of 1957, the SCP was able to weaken the Ba'ath Party to such an extent that the Ba'ath Party drafted a bill in December which called for a union with Egypt, a move that proved to be very popular. The Ba'ath Party was banned in the United Arab Republic (UAR), the union between Egypt and Syria, due to Gamal Abdel Nasser's hostility to parties other than his own. The Ba'ath leadership dissolved the party in 1958, gambling that the illegalisation of certain parties would hurt the SCP more than it would the Ba'ath.[17] Meanwhile, a small group of Syrian Ba'athist officers stationed in Egypt observed with alarm the party’s poor position and the increasing fragility of the union. They decided to form a secret military committee: its initial members were Lieutenant-Colonel Muhammad Umran, Major Salah Jadid and Captain Hafiz al-Assad. At first, the committee did not play any political role in the ba'athist movement; there are rumours[clarification needed] that prominent ba'athists did not know of the military committee's existence, but it rose to prominence within the party after the UAR's dissolution.[18]

A military coup in Damascus in 1961 brought the UAR to an end.[19] Sixteen prominent politicians signed a statement supporting the coup, among them al-Hawrani and Salah al-Din al-Bitar (who later retracted his signature).[20] Following the UAR's dissolution, the Ba'ath Party was reestablished at the 1962 congress.[21] The Ba'ath Party managed to win a handful of seats during 1961 parliamentary election.[19] The secession from the UAR was a time of crisis for the party: several groups left, most notably al-Hawrani who formally resigned on 20 June 1962 and reestablished the Arab Socialist Party (ASP). However, al-Hawrani's popular appeal had weakened over the years, and the ASP's only electoral stronghold was the Hama Governorate.[22]

[edit] The Ba'ath coup (1963)

That same year, the Syrian party’s military committee succeeded in persuading Nasserist and independent officers to make common cause with it, and they successfully carried out a military coup on 8 March. A National Revolutionary Command Council took control and assigned itself legislative power, appointing Salah al-Din al-Bitar as head of a "national front" government. The Ba'ath participated in this government along with the Arab Nationalist Movement, the United Arab Front, and the Socialist Unity Movement.

As historian Hanna Batatu notes, this took place without the fundamental disagreement over immediate or "considered" reunification having been resolved.[citation needed] The Ba'ath moved to consolidate its power within the new government, purging Nasserist officers in April. Subsequent disturbances led to the fall of the al-Bitar government, and the Ba'ath monopolized power in the aftermath of Jasim Alwan’s failed Nasserist coup in July.

[edit] Before the schism: (1963–1966)

[edit] The Iraqi Ba'ath Party organisation

[edit] Early years and the 14 July Revolution

Fuad al-Rikabi as seen before 1968

The party traces its origins to the official founding congress of the international Ba'ath Party in Damascus in 1947. Two Iraqis, Abd ar Rahman ad Damin and Abd al Khaliq al Khudayri, attended and became members of the party. Upon their return to Baghdad, they initiated the Iraqi Ba'athist movement. Damin became the movement's leader.[23]

Sa'dun Hamadi (a Shia muslim)[24] and Fuad al-Rikabi (an Iraqi engineer and a Shia muslim) founded the Ba'ath Party's Iraqi cell in 1951[25] as an Arab nationalist party, vague in its socialist orientation.[26] Al-Rikabi, expelled from the party in 1961 for being a Nasserist,[27] was a follower of Michel Aflaq, the founder of Ba'athism.[28] During the party's early days, members discussed topics regarding Arab nationalism, the social inequalities that had grown out of the British "Tribal Disputes Regulation", and the Iraqi Parliament's Law 28 of 1932 "Governing the Rights and Duties of Cultivators".[25] By 1953 the party, led by al-Rikabi, was engaged in subversive activities against the government.[29]

The party initially consisted of a majority of Shia muslims, as al-Rikabi recruited supporters mainly from his friends and family, but slowly became Sunni dominated.[30] The Ba'ath Party, and others of pan-Arab orientation, had increasing difficulties in increasing Shia membership within the party organisation. Most Shias saw pan-Arab thought as largely Sunni, since the majority of muslims in the Arab world where Sunnis. Because of this, the majority of Shias joined the Iraqi Communist Party instead of the Ba'ath Party. In the mid-1950s, eight of seventeen members of the Ba'ath leadership were Shia. According to Talib Shabib, the Ba'ath foreign minister in the Ahmed Hassan al-Bakr government, the secterian background of the leading Ba'ath members was considered of little importance because the majority of Ba'athist did not know each other's secterian denominations.[31] Between 1952 and 1963, 54% of the members of the Ba'ath Regional Command were considered Shia muslims. This majority is largely explained by al-Rikabi's effective recruitment drive in Shi'i areas. Between 1963 and 1970, after al-Rikabi's resignation, Shia representation in the Regional Command had dropped to 14 percent. However, of the three factions which existed within the Ba'ath Party, two out of three faction leaders were Shia.[32]

By the end of 1951 the party had at least 50 members.[33] With the collapse of the pan-Arabist state, the United Arab Republic (UAR), several leading Ba'ath members, including al-Rikabi, resigned from the party in protest.[34] In 1958, the year of the 14 July Revolution that overthrew the Hashemite monarchy, the Ba'ath Party had 300 members nationwide.[35] General Abd al-Karim Qasim, the leader of the Free Officer movement which overthrew the king, supported joining the pan-Arab state (UAR) at first, but changed his position when taking he took power. Several members of the Free Officer movements were also members of the Ba'ath Party. The Ba'ath Party considered the Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser, the leader of the pan-Arab movement, to be the leader most likely to succeed, and supported Iraq's joining the union. Of the sixteen members of Qasim's cabinet, 12 of them were Ba'ath Party members. However, the Ba'ath Party supported Qasim on the grounds that he would join Nasser's UAR.[36]

[edit] Qasim's Iraq

Saddam Hussein and the Ba'ath Party student cell, Cairo, in the period 1959–63.

Shortly after taking power, Qasim changed his position on joining the UAR and started campaigning for the "Iraq first policy".[36] To strengthen his own position within the government, Qasim created an alliance with the Iraqi Communist Party, which was opposed to any notion of pan-Arabism.[37] The change from the pan-Arab policy to the Iraq first policy provoked several pan-Arab organisations, especially the Ba'ath Party. Later that year, the Ba'ath Party leadership were planning to assassinate Qasim, and take power, to continue the policy of pan-Arabism which Qasim had discontinued. Saddam Hussein, the future President of Iraq and Secretary General of the Iraqi-based Ba'ath Party, was a leading member of the operation. At the time, the Ba'ath Party was more of an ideological experiment then a strong anti-government fighting machine. The majority of its members were either educated professionals or students, and Saddam fitted the bill.[38] The choice of Hussein was, according to historian Con Coughlin, "hardly surprising". Abdul Karim al-Shaikhly, the leader of the operation, asked Hussein to join the operation when one of team members left.[39] The idea of assassinating Qasim may have been Nasser's, and there are speculations that some of those who participated in the operation received training in Damascus, which was then part of the UAR.[40]

The assassins planned to ambush Qasim at Al-Rashid Street on 7 October 1959: one man was to kill those sitting at the back of the car, the rest killing those in front. During the ambush Hussein began shooting prematurely, which disorganised the whole operation. Qasim's chauffeur was killed, and Qasim was hit in the arm and shoulder. The assassins believed they had killed him and quickly retreated to their headquarters, but Qasim survived.[39] At the time of the attack the Ba'ath Party had less than 1,000 members.[41]

Some of the plotters quickly managed to leave the country for Syria, the spiritual home of Ba'athist ideology. There Hussein was given full-membership in the party by Michel Aflaq.[42] Some members of the operation were arrested and taken into custody by the Iraqi government. At the show trial, six of the defendants were given the death sentence; for unknown reasons the sentences were not carried out. Aflaq, the leader of the Ba'athist movement, organised the expulsion of leading Iraqi Ba'athist members, such as Fuad al-Rikabi, on the grounds that the party should not have initiated the attempt on Qasim's life. At the same time, Aflaq managed to secure seats in the Iraqi Ba'ath leadership for his supporters, one them being Hussein.[43]

Qasim was overthrown in the February 1963 Iraqi coup d'état, a coup masterminded by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and led on the ground by Ahmed Hassan al-Bakr.[44] Several army units refused to support the Ba'athist coup; the fighting lasted for two days[45] during which 1,500–5,000 were killed.[46] Qasim was captured and one hour later killed by firing squad. To ensure the Iraqi public that Qasim was dead, the plotters broadcasted a film of Qasim's corpse being mutilated.[45]

[edit] In power (1963)

Abdul Salam Arif became the President and Hassan al-Bakr became the Prime Minister.[46] Ali Salih al-Sadi, Secretary General of the Regional Command of the Iraqi Ba'ath Party, became Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Interior—a post he lost on 11 May. Despite not being Prime Minister, al-Sadi had effective control over the Iraqi Ba'at Party: seven out of nine members supported his leadership in the party's Regional Command.[47]

In the aftermath of the successful coup, the National Guard initiated an "orgy of violence" against all communist elements and some left-wing forces.[46] This period in Baghdad led to the establishment of several interrogation chambers, several private houses and public facilities were requisitioned by the government, and an entire section of Kifah Street was used by the National Guard. Many of the victims were either innocent, or victims of personal vendettas[48] The most notorious, according to Con Coughlin, torture chamber was located at the “Palace of the End”, where the royal family was killed in 1958. Nadhim Kazzer, who became Director of the Directorate of General Security, was responsible for the acts committed there. Con Coughlin consider this purge a forerunner for similar anti-leftist purges around the world, most notably the one in Chile under Augusto Pinochet's rule.[48]

The party was ousted from government in November 1963 due to factionalism. The question within the Ba'ath Party was whether or not it would pursue its ideological goal of establishing a union with Syria or Egypt, or both. al-Sadi supported a union with Syria, which was under the rule of the Ba'ath Party, while the more conservative military wing supported Qasim's "Iraq first policy".[49] Factionalism, coupled with the ill-disciplined behaviour of the National Guard, led the military wing to initiate a coup against the party's leadership; al-Sadi was forced into exile in Spain. al-Bakr, in an attempt to save the party, called for a meeting of the National Command of the Ba'ath Party. The meeting exacerbated the Party's problems. Aflaq, who saw himself as the leader of the pan-Arab ba'athist movement, declared his intent to take control of the Iraqi Ba'ath Party. The "Iraq first" wing were outraged, President Arif's lost of patience with the Ba'ath, and the Party was ousted from government on 18 November 1963.[50] The 12 Ba'ath members of government were forced to resign, and the National Guard was dissolved, replaced by the Republican Guard.[51] There are reasons to believe that Aflaq supported Arif's coup against the Ba'athist government in order to weaken al-Sadi's position within the party and strengthen his own.[52]

[edit] Union talks with Syria

Ahmen Hassan al-Bakr, as seen in 1974, led the Ba'athist coups of 1963 and 1968

At the time of al-Sadi's removal from office as Interior Minister, factionalism and discontent were growing within the party. al-Sadi and Mundur al-Windawi (the leader of the Ba'ath Party's National Guard) led the civilian wing, President Arif led the military wing and Talib Shabib led the pro-Aflaq wing.[47] But a bigger schism was underway in the international Ba'athist movement. Four major factions were being created: the Old Guard, led by Aflaq; a civilian alliance between the Secretary Generals of the Regional Commands of Syria and Iraq, led by Hammud al-Shufi and al-Sadi respectively; the Syrian Ba'ath Military Committee, represented by Salah Jadid, Muhammad Umran, Hafiz al-Assad, Salim Hatum and Amin al-Hafiz; and the Iraqi military wing which supported Arif's presidency, represented by al-Bakr, Salih Mahdi Ammash, Tahir Yahya and Hardan Tikriti. The military wings in Syria and Iraq opposed the creation of a pan-Arab state; al-Shufi and al-Sadi supported it. Aflaq officially supported it, but privately opposed it because he was afraid al-Sadi would challenge his position as Secretary General of the National Command of the Ba'ath Party, the leader of the international Ba'athist movement.[53]

Both Syria and Iraq were under Ba'athist rule in 1963. When President Arif visited Syria on a state visit, Sami al-Jundi (a Syrian cabinet minister) proposed the creation of a bilateral union between the two countries. Both Arif and Amin al-Hafiz, President of Syria, supported the idea of a bilateral union; al-Jundi was given the task of setting up a committee to begin work on establishing the union. al-Sadi was selected by al-Jundi as Iraq's chief representative in the committee, in a bid to strengthen al-Sadi's position within the Ba'ath Party. Work on the union continued with the signing of the Military Unity Charter which established the Higher Military Council, an organ which oversaw the integration and control over the Syrian and Iraqi military. Ammash, the Iraqi Minister of Defense, became the Chairman of the Higher Military Council. The unified headquarter was placed in Syria. The establishment of the military union became evident on 20 October 1963 when Syrian soldiers were found fighting alongside the Iraqi military in Iraqi Kurdistan.[54] At this stage, both Iraqi and Syrian ba'athists feared excluding Gamal Abdel Nasser from the union talks, as Nasser—the unofficial leader of the pan-Arab movement—had a large following.[55]

The fall of al-Bakr's first government was initially criticised by the Syrian state and its Ba'ath Party. They took a softer tone when they discovered that some members of the cabinet were still Ba'ath Party members. However, the remaining Ba'athists were slowly removed from office. The Syrian Revolutionary Command Council responded by abrogating the Military Unity Charter on 26 April 1964, ending the bilateral unification process between Iraq and Syria.[52]

[edit] The 1966 split

Michel Aflaq (left) and Salah Jadid (right) in 1963, shortly after taking power in 1963

The challenges of building a Ba'athist state led to considerable ideological discussion and internal struggle within the party. The Iraqi branch was increasingly dominated by Ali Salih al-Sadi, who surprisingly declared himself a Marxist, surprising because of his previously anti-communist stance, in the summer of 1963.[56] He gained support in this from Syrian regional secretary Hamoud el Choufi, the Secretary General of the Syrian Regional Command,[57] Yasin al-Hafiz, one of the party’s few ideological theorists, and some members of the secret military committee supported al-Sadi's position.[58]

The far-left tendency gained control at the party’s Sixth National Congress of 1963, where hardliners from the dominant Syrian and Iraqi regional parties joined forces to impose a hard left line, calling for "socialist planning",[59] "collective farms run by peasants", "workers' democratic control of the means of production", a party based on workers and peasants, and other demands reflecting a certain emulation of Soviet-style socialism.[60] In a coded attack on Michel Aflaq, the congress also condemned "ideological notability" within the party.[59] Aflaq, bitterly angry at this transformation of his party, retained a nominal leadership role, but the National Command as a whole came under the control of the radicals.[61]

In 1963 the Ba'ath Party seized power, from then on the Ba'ath functioned as the only officially recognized Syrian political party, but factionalism and splintering within the party led to a succession of governments and new constitutions.[21] On 23 February 1966, a bloody coup d'état led by left-wing extremists, a radical Ba'athist faction headed by Chief of Staff Salah Jadid, overthrew the Syrian Government. The coup sprung out of factional rivalry between Jadid's "regionalist" (qutri) camp of the Ba'ath Party, which promoted ambitions for a Greater Syria and the more traditionally pan-Arab, in power faction, called the "nationalist" (qawmi) faction. Jadid's supporters were also seen as more radically left-wing. Many of Jadid's opponents managed to make their escape and flee to Beirut.[62] The Ba'ath wing led by Jadid took power, and set the party out on a more radical line. Although they had not been supporters of the victorious far-left line at the Sixth Party Congress, they had now moved to adopt its positions and displaced the more moderate wing in power, purging from the party its original founders, Aflaq and al-Bitar.[63]

Ahmed Hassan al-Bakr (left), the Regional Secretary of the Iraqi Ba'ath branch, shaking hands with Michel Aflaq in 1968

During the factional struggles within Syria Ba'ath Party organisation in the 1960s, three factions emerged from the party had emerged. A pro-Nasser group split from the party at the breakup of union with Egypt in 1961, and later became the Socialist Unionists. This group later splintered several times, but one branch of the movement was coopted by the Ba'ath into the National Progressive Front.[64] The far-left line of Yasin al-Hafiz, which had impressed Marxist influences on the party in 1963, broke off the following year to form what later became the Arab Revolutionary Workers Party,[65] while Jadid's and Atassi's wing of the organization reunited as the clandestine Arab Socialist Democratic Ba'ath Party. Both the latter organizations in 1980 joined an opposition coalition called the National Democratic Gathering.[66]

The Damascus-based Ba'ath and the Baghdad-based Ba'ath were by now two separate parties, each maintaining that it was the genuine party and electing a National Command to take charge of the party across the Arab world. However, in Syria, the Regional Command was the real centre of party power, and the membership of the National Command was a largely honorary position, often the destination of figures being eased out of the leadership.[61] A consequence of the split was that Zaki al-Arsuzi took Aflaq's place as the official father of ba'athist thought in the Syrian-led Ba'ath Party, the Iraqi-led Ba'ath Party still considered Aflaq the de jure father of ba'athist thought.[67]

[edit] Modern Ba'athism

[edit] Transition, marxism and Assad-rule

Syrian President Hafez al-Assad (centre) with Iraqi President Saddam Hussein (left), Algerian Foreign Minister Abdelaziz Bouteflika (right), and Syrian Vice-president Abdul Halim Khaddam (far right, half-covered)

At this juncture, the Syrian Ba'ath party split into two factions: the 'progressive' faction, led by President and Regional Secretary Nureddin al-Atassi gave priority to the radical Marxist-influenced line the Ba'ath was pursuing, but was closely linked to the security forces of Deputy Secretary Salah Jadid, the country's strongman from 1966. This faction was strongly preoccupied with what it termed the "Socialist transformation" in Syria, ordering large-scale nationalization of economic assets and agrarian reform.[68] It favored an equally radical approach in external affairs, and condemned "reactionary" Arab governments while preaching "people's war" against Israel; this led to Syria's virtual isolation even within the Arab world.[69] The other faction, which came to dominate the armed forces, was headed by Defense Minister Hafez al-Assad. He took a more pragmatic political line, viewing reconciliation with the conservative Arab states, notably Egypt and Saudi Arabia, as essential for Syria’s strategic position regardless of their political color. He also called for reversing some of the socialist economic measures and for allowing a limited role for non-Ba'athist political parties in state and society.[70]

In early January 1965 the Syrian Ba'ath Party nationalized about a hundred companies, "many of them mere workshops, employing in all some 12,000 workers." Conservative Damascus merchants closing their shops and "with the help of Muslim preachers, called out the populace" to protest against the expropriation. The government fought back with the Ba'ath Party National Guard and "newly formed Workers' Militia." In retaliation for the uprising the state assumed new powers to appoint and dismiss Sunni Muslim Friday prayer-leaders and took over the administration of religious foundations (awqaf), "the main source of funds of the Muslim establishment."[71]

Current president and Ba'ath leader Bashar al-Assad

Despite constant maneuvering and government changes, the two factions remained in an uneasy coalition of power. After the 1967 Six-Day War, tensions increased, and Assad's faction strengthened its hold on the military; from late 1968,[72] it began dismantling Salah Jadid's support networks, facing ineffectual resistance from the civilian branch of the party that remained under his control.[73] This duality of power persisted until November 1970, when, in another coup, Assad succeeded in ousting Atassi as prime minister and imprisoned both him and Jadid. He then set upon a project of rapid institution-building, reopening parliament and adopting a permanent constitution for the country, which had been ruled by military fiat or provisional constitutional documents since 1963.[63] The Ba'ath Party was turned into a patronage network closely intertwined with the bureaucracy, and soon became virtually indistinguishable from the state, while membership rules were liberalised; in 1987 the party had 50,000 members in Syria, with another 200,000 candidate members on probation.[74] The party simultaneously lost its independence from the state, and was turned into a tool of the Assad government, which remained based essentially in the security forces. Other socialist parties that accepted the basic orientation of the government were permitted to operate again, and in 1972 the National Progressive Front was established as a coalition of these legal parties; however, they were only permitted to act as junior partners to the Ba'ath, with very little room for independent organization.[75]

al-Assad died in office as President of Syria and Secretary General of both the Regional Command and the National Command on 10 June 2000, when his son Bashar al-Assad succeeded him as President and as Secretary General of the Regional Command[76] while Abdullah al-Ahmar succeeded him de facto as Secretary General of the National Command through his office of Assistant Secretary General – Hafez, even if dead, is still the de jure Secretary General of the National Command.[77] Since then, the party has experienced an important generational shift, and a discreet ideological reorientation decreasing the emphasis on socialist planning in the economy, but no significant changes have taken place in its relation to the state and state power.[78] It remains essentially a patronage and supervisory tool of the government elite.[79] The Ba'ath today holds 134 of the 250 seats in the Syrian Parliament, a figure which is dictated by election regulations rather than by voting patterns,[80] and the Syrian Constitution stipulates that it is "the leading party of society and state", granting it a legally enforced monopoly on real political power.[81]

For more information regarding the Syrian Ba'athist movement, see Ba'ath Party (Syrian-led faction)

[edit] Transition, coup and Ba'athist Iraq

Baghdad-based Ba'ath Party logo

Was in use from 1974–1987
Was in use from 1979–2003; the banned Ba'ath Party still uses it.

In the aftermath of the coup led against the Ba'ath Party, al-Bakr became the dominant driving force behind the party, and was elected Secretary General of the Regional Command sometime during in 1964. Saddam Hussein received full party membership and received a seat in the Regional Command of the Iraqi Ba'ath Party because he was a close protege of al-Bakr.[51] With al-Bakr consent Hussein initiated a drive improve the party's internal security; the party's internal security organs would later work as Hussein's power base. During his exile in Egypt, Hussein had been influenced by the thoughts and deeds of Joseph Stalin, and frequently uttered Stalinists maxims such as "If there is a person there is a problem; if there is no person then there is no problem".[82] In 1964 Hussein established the Jihaz Haneen, the party's secretive security apparatus, to act as a counterweight to the military officers in the party, to weaken the military's hold on the party.[83]

In contrast to the 1963 coup, the 1968 coup led by civilian Ba'ath Party members. The President of Iraq Abdul Rahman Arif, who had taken over from his brother, was a weak leader according to historian Con Coughlin. Hussein, through the Jihaz Haneen, managed to get in contact with several military officers before the coup who either supported the Ba'ath Party, or wanted to use the party as a vehicle to power. Some officers, such as Hardan al-Tikriti, were already members of the party, while Abdul Razzak Nayif, the deputy head of military intelligence, and Colonel Ibrahim Daud, the commander of the Republican Guard were neither party members or sympathetic to their cause. In a surprising turn of events, on 16 July 1968, Nayif and Daud were summoned to the Presidential Palace to Arif, where he asked them if they knew of a imminent coup against him. Both Nayid and Daud denied knowledge of any coup. However, when the Ba'ath Party leadership got a hold on this information, they quickly convened a meeting at al-Bakr's house. The meeting came to the conclusion that the coup had to be initiated as quickly as possible, even if they had to concede to give Nayif and Daud the posts of Prime Minister and Defense Minister respectively. Hussein, at the meeting, declared "I am aware that the two officers have been imposed on us and that they want to stab the Party in the back in the service of some interest or other, but we have no choice. We should collaborate with them and liquidiated immediatley during, or after, the revolution. And i volunteer to carry out the task".[84]

Then Iraqi President Ahmed Hassan al-Bakr, right, and Saddam Hussein as seen in Baghdad, 1978.

The so-called 17 July Revolution was in the purest sense, a military coup, and not a popular revolt against the incumbent government. In comparison to the coups of 1958 and 1963, the 1968 was, according to historian Con Coughlin, a "relatively civil affair". The coup, which begun in the early morning of 17 July, was initiated by the seizing of several key positions by the military and Ba'ath Party activists, such as the headquarters of the Ministry of Defense and television-, radio- and the electricity station. All the city's bridges were captured, all telephone lines were cut and at exactly 3 A.M. the order was given to march on the Presidential Palace. President Arif, who was fast asleep, had no control over the situation whatsoever.[85] The plot was masterminded by al-Bakr,[86] but led on the ground by Hussein and Saleh Omar al-Ali.[85] A power struggle, which was anticipated and planned by al-Bakr, between the Ba'ath Party and the military, represented by Nayif and Daud, begun.[87] Daud lost his ministership during an official visit to Jordan, while Nayid was exiled after Hussein threatened him and his family with death.[88]

At the time of the party's seizure of power, only 5,000 people were members,[89] by the late 1970s it had increased to 1.2 million members.[90] In 1974 the Iraqi Ba'athists formed the National Progressive Front to broaden support for the government's initiatives. Wranglings within the party continued, and the government periodically purged its dissident members,[91] among them was Fuad al-Rikabi, the party's first Secretary General of the Regional Command.[92] Emerging as the party strongman,[93] Hussein eventually used his growing power[94] to push al-Bakr aside in 1979 and ruled Iraq until the 2003 Invasion of Iraq.[95] Under Hussein's tenure, before the Iran–Iraq War, Iraq experienced its most dramatic and successful period of economic growth,[96] with its citizens enjoying standards of health care, housing, instruction and salaries/stipends well comparable to those of European countries. Several major infrastructures were laid down to help with the country's growth,[97] and the Iraqi oil industry was nationalised[98] with help from the Soviet Union; Alexei Kosygin, the Chairman of the USSR Council of Ministers, signed the bilateral treaty, the Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation in 1972.[94]

For more information regarding the Iraqi Ba'athist movement, see Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party – Iraq Region, Ba'ath Party (Iraqi-led faction) and History of Iraq (1968–2003)

[edit] References

  1. ^ van Dam, Nikolaos (1979). "The Struggle for Power in Syria: Sectarianism, Regionalism and Tribalism in Politics". I B Tauris. 
  2. ^ Hamel, Ernest (1859). "Histoire de Saint-Just Député de la Convention Nationale". Impr. et Librairie Poulet-Malassis et Broise. 
  3. ^ Germany and the Middle East 1871-1945, ed. Schwanitz, Wolfgang G., Frankfurt, Vervuert Verlag 2004 ISBN 3-86527-157-X
  4. ^ Hazem Zaki Nuseibeh, The Ideas of Arab Nationalism, p. 76; Youssef M. Choueiri, Arab Nationalism: A History: Nation and State in the Arab World, p. 123
  5. ^ a b c d e Commins, Dean (2004). Historical Dictionary of Syria. Scarecrow Press. p. 65. ISBN 978-0810849348. 
  6. ^ a b c Choueiri, Youssef (2000). Arab nationalism: a History: Nation and State in the Arab World. Wiley-Blackwell. p. 234. ISBN 978-0631217290. 
  7. ^ Tejei, Jordi (2009). Syia's Kurd: History , Politics and Society. Routledge. p. 149. ISBN 978-1134096437. 
  8. ^ Jones, Jeremy (2007). Negotiating Change: The New Politics of the Middle East. I.B. Tauris. p. 96. ISBN 978-1845112695. 
  9. ^ Jones, Jeremy (2009). Negotiating Change: The New Politics of the Middle East. I.B. Tauris. p. 97. ISBN 978-3531162055. 
  10. ^ Kostiner, Joseph (2007). Conflict and Cooperation in the Gulf Region. VS Verlag. p. 36. ISBN 978-1845112695. 
  11. ^ George, Alan (2003). Syria: Neither Bread nor Freedom. Zed Books. pp. 66–67. ISBN 978-1842772139. 
  12. ^ a b George, Alan (2003). Syria: Neither Bread nor Freedom. Zed Books. p. 67. ISBN 978-1842772139. 
  13. ^ Peretz, Don (1994). The Middle East today. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 413. ISBN 978-0275945766. 
  14. ^ Finer, Samuel; Stanley, Jay (2009). The Man on Horseback: The Role of the Military in Politics. Transaction Publishers. p. 149. ISBN 978-0765809222. 
  15. ^ Federal Research Division (2004). Syria: A Country Study. Kessinger Publishing. p. 211. ISBN 978-1419150227. 
  16. ^ Federal Research Division (2004). Syria: A Country Study. Kessinger Publishing. pp. 210–211. ISBN 978-1419150227. 
  17. ^ Federal Research Division (2004). Syria: A Country Study. Kessinger Publishing. pp. 211–212. ISBN 978-1419150227. 
  18. ^ Rabinovich, Itamar (1972). Syria under the Baʻth, 1963–66: The Army Party Symbiosis. Transaction Publishers. pp. 25. ISBN 978-0706512669. 
  19. ^ a b Federal Research Division (2004). Syria: A Country Study. Kessinger Publishing. pp. 52–53. ISBN 978-1419150227. 
  20. ^ Podeh, Elie (1999). The Decline of Arab unity: The Rise and Fall of the United Arabic Republic. Sussex Academic Press. pp. 152–153. ISBN 978-1902210204. 
  21. ^ a b Federal Research Division (2004). Syria: A Country Study. Kessinger Publishing. p. 55. ISBN 978-1419150227. 
  22. ^ Moubayed, Sami M. (2006). Steel & Silk: Men and Women who shaped Syria 1900–2000. Cune Press. p. 249. ISBN 978-1885942400. 
  23. ^ Metz, Helen Chapin. "Iraq — Politics: The Baath Party". Library of Congress Country Studies. http://countrystudies.us/iraq/77.htm. Retrieved 23 October 2011. 
  24. ^ Sheffer, Gabriel; Ma'oz, Moshe (2002). Middle Eastern Minorities and Diasporas. Sussex Academic Press. p. 174. ISBN 978- 1902210840. 
  25. ^ a b Polk, William Roe (2006). Understanding Iraq: A Whistlestop Tour from Ancient Babylon to Occupied Baghdad. I.B. Tauris. p. 109. ISBN 978- 1845111230. 
  26. ^ Tripp, Charles (2002). A History of Iraq. Cambridge University Press. p. 143. ISBN 978- 052152900X. 
  27. ^ Davies, Eric (2005). Memories of State: politics, history, and collective identity in modern Iraq. University of California Press. p. 200. ISBN 978- 0520235460. 
  28. ^ Davies, Eric (2005). Memories of State: politics, history, and collective identity in modern Iraq. University of California Press. p. 320. ISBN 978- 0520235460. 
  29. ^ Patterson, David (2010). A Genealogy of Evil: Anti-Semitism from Nazism to Islamic Jihad. Cambridge University Press. p. 229. ISBN 978- 0521132614. 
  30. ^ Nakash, Yitzhak (2003). The Shi'is of Iraq. Princeton University Press. p. 136. ISBN 978- 0691115753. 
  31. ^ Dawisha, Addid (2005). Arab nationalism in the Twentieth Century: From Triumph to Despair. Princeton University Press. p. 174. ISBN 978- 0691122725. 
  32. ^ Sheffer, Gabriel; Ma'oz, Moshe (2002). Middle Eastern Minorities and Diasporas. Sussex Academic Press. pp. 174–175. ISBN 978-1902210840. 
  33. ^ Tucker, Spencer; Mary Roberts, Priscilla (2008). The encyclopedia of the Arab–Israeli conflict: a political, social, and military history: A–F. 1. ABC-CLIO. p. 185. ISBN 978-1851098410. 
  34. ^ Dawisha, Addid (2005). Arab nationalism in the Twentieth Century: From Triumph to Despair. Princeton University Press. p. 224. ISBN 978- 0691122725. 
  35. ^ Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. p. 22. ISBN 978- 0060505435. 
  36. ^ a b Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. pp. 24–25. ISBN 978-0060505435. 
  37. ^ Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. pp. 25–26. ISBN 978-0060505435. 
  38. ^ Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. p. 26. ISBN 978-0060505435. 
  39. ^ a b Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. p. 29. ISBN 978-0060505435. 
  40. ^ Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. p. 27. ISBN 978-0060505435. 
  41. ^ Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. p. 30. ISBN 978-0060505435. 
  42. ^ Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. p. 33. ISBN 978-0060505435. 
  43. ^ Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. p. 34. ISBN 978-0060505435. 
  44. ^ Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. p. 39. ISBN 978-0060505435. 
  45. ^ a b Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. p. 40. ISBN 978-0060505435. 
  46. ^ a b c Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. p. 41. ISBN 978-0060505435. 
  47. ^ a b Mufti, Malik (1996). Sovereign creations: pan-Arabism and Political order in Syria and Iraq. Cornell University Press. p. 161. ISBN 978-0801431689. 
  48. ^ a b Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. pp. 41–42. ISBN 978-0060505435. 
  49. ^ Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. p. 44. ISBN 978-0060505435. 
  50. ^ Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. p. 45. ISBN 978-0060505435. 
  51. ^ a b Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. pp. 45–46. ISBN 978-0060505435. 
  52. ^ a b Mufti, Malik (1996). Sovereign creations: pan-Arabism and Political order in Syria and Iraq. Cornell University Press. p. 165. ISBN 978-0801431689. 
  53. ^ Mufti, Malik (1996). Sovereign creations: pan-Arabism and Political order in Syria and Iraq. Cornell University Press. p. 159. ISBN 978-0801431689. 
  54. ^ Mufti, Malik (1996). Sovereign creations: pan-Arabism and Political order in Syria and Iraq. Cornell University Press. p. 160. ISBN 978-0801431689. 
  55. ^ Mufti, Malik (1996). Sovereign creations: pan-Arabism and Political order in Syria and Iraq. Cornell University Press. pp. 160–161. ISBN 978-0801431689. 
  56. ^ DeFronzo, James (2009). The Iraq War: Origins and Consequences. Westview Press. p. 61. ISBN 978-0813343917. 
  57. ^ The Spectator. 212. 1964. p. 473. ISBN 978-0813343917. 
  58. ^ Seale, Patrick (1990). Asad of Syria: The Struggle for the Middle East. University of California Press. p. 87. ISBN 978-0520069765. 
  59. ^ a b Ali, Tariq (2004). Bush in Babylon: The Recolonisation of Iraq. Verso. p. 105. ISBN 978-1844675122. 
  60. ^ Hiro, Dilip (1982). Inside the Middle East. Routledge & Kegan Paul. p. 143. ISBN 978-0710090390. 
  61. ^ a b Ali, Tariq (2004). Bush in Babylon: The Recolonisation of Iraq. Verso. p. 106–107. ISBN 978-1844675122. 
  62. ^ Federal Research Division (2004). Syria: A Country Study. Kessinger Publishing. p. 59. ISBN 978-1419150227. 
  63. ^ a b Federal Research Division (2004). Syria: A Country Study. Kessinger Publishing. p. 213. ISBN 978-1419150227. 
  64. ^ Seale, Patrick (1990). Asad of Syria: The Struggle for the Middle East. University of California Press. p. 175–176. ISBN 978-0520069765. 
  65. ^ Tibi, Bassam (1997). Arab Nationalism: Between Islam and the Nation-state. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 212. ISBN 978-0312162863. 
  66. ^ Kienle, Eberhard (1997). Contemporary Syria: Liberalization between Cold War and Cold Peace. British Academic Press. p. 87. ISBN 978-1860641350. 
  67. ^ Bengio, Ofra (1998). Saddam's Word: Political Discourse in Iraq. Oxford University Press. p. 218. ISBN 978-0195114396. 
  68. ^ Federal Research Division (2004). Syria: A Country Study. Kessinger Publishing. p. 133. ISBN 978-1419150227. 
  69. ^ Seale, Patrick (1990). Asad of Syria: The Struggle for the Middle East. University of California Press. p. 144. ISBN 978-0520069765. 
  70. ^ Seale, Patrick (1990). Asad of Syria: The Struggle for the Middle East. University of California Press. p. 146. ISBN 978-0520069765. 
  71. ^ Seale, Patrick (1990). Asad of Syria: The Struggle for the Middle East. University of California Press. p. 97. ISBN 978-0520069765. 
  72. ^ Seale, Patrick (1990). Asad of Syria: The Struggle for the Middle East. University of California Press. p. 142. ISBN 978-0520069765. 
  73. ^ Seale, Patrick (1990). Asad of Syria: The Struggle for the Middle East. University of California Press. pp. 149–150. ISBN 978-0520069765. 
  74. ^ Federal Research Division (2004). Syria: A Country Study. Kessinger Publishing. p. 214. ISBN 978-1419150227. 
  75. ^ Kedar, Mordechai (2006). Asad in Search of Legitimacy: Message and Rhetoric in the Syrian Press Under. Sussex Academic Press. p. 228. ISBN 978-1845191854. 
  76. ^ Federal Research Division (2004). Syria: A Country Study. Kessinger Publishing. pp. 199–200. ISBN 978-1419150227. 
  77. ^ Brechner, Michael (1978). Studies in Crisis Behavior. Transaction Publishers. p. 257. ISBN 978-0878552928. 
  78. ^ Tucker, Spencer; Mary Roberts, Priscilla (2008). The encyclopedia of the Arab–Israeli conflict: a political, social, and military history: A–F. 1. ABC-CLIO. pp. 167–168. ISBN 978-1851098410. 
  79. ^ Leverett, Flynt Lawrence (2005). Inheriting Syria: Bashar's trial by fire. Brookings Institution Press. p. 84. ISBN 978-0815752040. 
  80. ^ Sharp, Jeremy (2011). Syria: Issues for the 112th Congress and Background on U.S. Sanctions. DIANE Publishing. p. 8. ISBN 978-1437944655. 
  81. ^ Tucker, Spencer; Mary Roberts, Priscilla (2008). The encyclopedia of the Arab–Israeli conflict: a political, social, and military history: A–F. 1. ABC-CLIO. p. 183. ISBN 978-1851098410. 
  82. ^ Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. pp. 47–48. ISBN 978-0060505435. 
  83. ^ Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. p. 48. ISBN 978-0060505435. 
  84. ^ Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. p. 55. ISBN 978-0060505435. 
  85. ^ a b Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. p. 52. ISBN 978-0060505435. 
  86. ^ Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. p. 53. ISBN 978-0060505435. 
  87. ^ Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. p. 56. ISBN 978-0060505435. 
  88. ^ Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. p. 57. ISBN 978-0060505435. 
  89. ^ Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. p. 74. ISBN 978-0060505435. 
  90. ^ Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. p. 120. ISBN 978-0060505435. 
  91. ^ Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. p. 94. ISBN 978-0060505435. 
  92. ^ Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. p. 85. ISBN 978-0060505435. 
  93. ^ Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. p. 98. ISBN 978-0060505435. 
  94. ^ a b Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. p. 106. ISBN 978-0060505435. 
  95. ^ Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. p. 150. ISBN 978-0060505435. 
  96. ^ Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. p. 113. ISBN 978-0060505435. 
  97. ^ Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. p. 107. ISBN 978-0060505435. 
  98. ^ Coughlin, Con (2005). Saddam: His Rise and Fall. Harper Perennial. p. 105. ISBN 978-0060505435. 

[edit] Bibliography

[edit] External links

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export
Languages