Jump to content

Wikipedia:Closure requests: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 113: Line 113:
Need an uninvolved admin to close the discussion. It should be easy. I left some instructions at the bottom of the discussion. -- [[User:Magioladitis|Magioladitis]] ([[User talk:Magioladitis|talk]]) 00:12, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Need an uninvolved admin to close the discussion. It should be easy. I left some instructions at the bottom of the discussion. -- [[User:Magioladitis|Magioladitis]] ([[User talk:Magioladitis|talk]]) 00:12, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
*I NACed this. The discussion was actually less clear than it first appeared and a passing admin may wish to either endorse my close or write another one. [[User:Hobit|Hobit]] ([[User talk:Hobit|talk]]) 18:51, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
*I NACed this. The discussion was actually less clear than it first appeared and a passing admin may wish to either endorse my close or write another one. [[User:Hobit|Hobit]] ([[User talk:Hobit|talk]]) 18:51, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
**I'll endorse it if necessary, but I don't see a need. I had a look and I thought it was a very well-considered summing up. [[User:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Teal" face="Tahoma">'''HJ&nbsp;Mitchell'''</font>]] &#124; [[User talk:HJ Mitchell|<font color="Navy" face= "Times New Roman">Penny for your thoughts? </font>]] 17:23, 21 August 2012 (UTC)


=== [[Wikipedia talk:Article Feedback/Guidelines#RFC on Monitor Guidelines]] ===
=== [[Wikipedia talk:Article Feedback/Guidelines#RFC on Monitor Guidelines]] ===

Revision as of 17:23, 21 August 2012

    Thank you to closing admins

    Thank you, Beeblebrox (talk · contribs), The Blade of the Northern Lights (talk · contribs), Drmies (talk · contribs), and other admins for your considered closures of the RfCs mentioned on this board. I am deeply grateful for your help in assessing the consensuses in these discussions. Thank you, Armbrust (talk · contribs), for keeping this board cleared of fulfilled requests. Cunard (talk) 01:00, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Thank you, ThaddeusB (talk · contribs), Armbrust (talk · contribs), and other closers for your thoughtful closures. Cunard (talk) 06:25, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you, Jafeluv (talk · contribs), Beeblebrox (talk · contribs), and The Blade of the Northern Lights (talk · contribs) for your closures. Cunard (talk) 22:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]


    Requests for closure

    Would an admin assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Anti-Christian sentiment#Israel (see the subsection at Talk:Anti-Christian sentiment#RFC: the inclusion/exclusion of various incidents of discrimination and intolerance against Christians in Israel)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:08, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Would an admin assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Lamia (Dungeons & Dragons)#Pathfinder reference and Talk:Lamia (Dungeons & Dragons)#Kenzer reference (initiated 25 June 2012)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:15, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Would an admin assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Jared Lee Loughner#RFC: To atheist or not to atheist (initiated 29 June 2012)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:00, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Now archived at Talk:Jared_Lee_Loughner/Archive_3#RFC:_To_atheist_or_not_to_atheist. Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 07:04, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Now un-archived. Please close the discussion. Could someone determine if this edit by another user forced the archiving of an RfC awaiting a close? Viriditas (talk) 09:41, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, that edit has made the bot archive the section. Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 09:48, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Note that the RFC Bot had removed the RFC notice automatically, as RFC's expire automatically at 30 days of age. This occurred PRIOR to my edit. Safiel (talk) 16:20, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    I will place a Do Not Archive template on that thread to prevent it from rearchiving prior to admin closure. Safiel (talk) 18:17, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    At Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure/Archive 3#Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Reference Tooltips, David1217 (talk · contribs) wrote that "Closure is no longer necessary. A VPM discussion closed as (rough) support for enabling ReferenceTooltips by default, and the relevant MediaWiki gadgets page has been modified to make the tooltips default." I cannot find the VPM discussion that was closed with rough support for enabling Reference Tooltips by default. Would David1217 or another user who knows the location of the discussion close Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 89#Reference Tooltips with a pointer to the VPM discussion to provide documentation? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:00, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    The VPM discussion is already archived at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(miscellaneous)/Archive_38#ReferenceTooltips. Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 07:25, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you for the link, Armbrust, but I don't see how the discussion was "closed as (rough) support for enabling ReferenceTooltips by default", as stated by David1217 (talk · contribs). Cunard (talk) 00:35, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Well I don't know, but Reference Tooltips were enabled as defeault, as I have to opt-out. Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 05:57, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Okay. Would someone summarize the discussion's consensus for documentation purposes and link to any Bugzilla request (if there is any) that implemented Reference Tooltips? Cunard (talk) 00:58, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    The discussion at Talk:Shrimp#Request for comment has been at times contentious, with users contesting closer John (talk · contribs)'s neutrality. Would a completely uninvolved admin assess the consensus at Talk:Shrimp#Request for comment, taking into account this comment by John (talk · contribs) and this comment by Dennis Brown (talk · contribs), two admins who were asked to review the discussion? Cunard (talk) 01:00, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Would an admin summarize the consensus at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Offender9000 (initiated 25 June 2012)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:08, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Would an admin assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Macclesfield Bank#China and Taiwan (initiated 11 June 2012)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:58, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Username policy#RfC - Handling promotional usernames (initiated 2 July 2012)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:25, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Would an admin assess the consensus at the RfC at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Informing new creators of article guidelines (initiated 5 July 2012)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:25, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Would an admin assess the consensus at the RfC at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Activate section 0 edit link for everyone (initiated 12 July 2012)? If the consensus is to activate the section 0 edit link, would the closing admin or a user with a bugzilla account file a report there? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:25, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Would an admin assess the consensus at Template talk:FoP-USonly#RFC: Does US FoP apply to foreign works? (initiated 12 July 2012)? The RfC is listed at Template:Centralized discussion. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:25, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Would an admin assess the consensus at Talk:Political activities of the Koch brothers#RfC: Should the article include funding college programs promoting free enterprise? (initiated 13 July 2012)? The last comment was on 4 August 2012. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 06:25, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist has a severe backlog; the oldest entries date from January. Would an admin (or admins) review:

    Closed
    1. MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist#Let Me Google That For You -  Done by Hu12 (talk · contribs) Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 18:45, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    2. MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist#LMGTFY.com on article RTFM -  Done by Hu12 (talk · contribs). Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 09:13, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    3. MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist#ehow.com/how_4621475_almond-jelly-dessert.html -  Done by Hu12 (talk · contribs). Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 18:13, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    4. MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist#uservoice.com -  Request withdrawn by Woz2 (talk · contribs) Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 22:54, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    5. MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist#Online-Scratch-Card -  Done by Amatulic (talk · contribs). Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 01:30, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    6. MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist#Calendar Published by AIP on lulu.com -  Done by Amatulic (talk · contribs). Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 08:16, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    7. MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist#Clipmarks -  Done by Amatulic (talk · contribs). Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 08:16, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    8. MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist#backupurl.com/zo9cxt -  Done by Amatulic (talk · contribs). Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 08:16, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    9. MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist#Site xuarez.comoj.com -  Done by AGK (talk · contribs). Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 18:43, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Waiting for closure
    1. MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist#A History of Broadcasting in the Philippines From World War II to the Birth of Philippine Television
    2. MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist#Two Village Residents in Swedish Lapland, Where The Train Stops
    3. MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist#www.opposingviews.com/i/society/gay-issues/did-airman-randy-phillips-err-posting-video-coming-out-dad
    4. MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist#s14.invisionfree.com/Conchologist_Forum/ar/t2125.htm
    5. MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist#Statsheet
    6. MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist#cbronline: 26 April 1992 article
    7. MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist#http://www.examiner.com/classic-movie-in-new-york/nancy-s-story
    8. MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist#Request for edit on Denver
    9. MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist#www.justjaredjr.com/2012/04/01/taylor-swift-kids-choice-awards-2012 on article Taylor Swift
    10. MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist#bit.ly/wlafghan2
    11. MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist#www.fort-kochi.com
    12. MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist#outrate.net
    13. MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist#Traditio-ru.org
    14. MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist#examiner.com on Terry Riley
    15. MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist#z4.invisionfree.com
    16. MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist#UKMIX page
    17. MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist#Uncensored Interviews interview with Poni Hoax
    18. MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist#Bad 25 Release Details PDF)

    After reviewing an entry, please post a comment on the requester's talk page because the requester may no longer be watching the page after such a lengthy period of time. MediaWiki:Spam-whitelist/Indicators may be useful. Thank you, Cunard (talk) 02:33, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Please close this dicussion. It was started by an editor who has since been identified an a sockpuppet for banned a editor. Martinvl (talk) 05:35, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Need an uninvolved admin to close the discussion. It should be easy. I left some instructions at the bottom of the discussion. -- Magioladitis (talk) 00:12, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Article Feedback/Guidelines#RFC on Monitor Guidelines (initiated 16 July 2012)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Speedy deletion of machine translations (initiated 21 July 2012)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Miscellany for deletion#RfC: Is MfD an appropriate venue to discuss portions of userpages? (July 2012) (initiated 21 July 2012)? The discussion was listed at and archived from Template:Centralized discussion. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/Archive 91#New class of admin-moderators to resolve content disputes (initiated 24 July 2012)? The discussion was listed at and archived from Template:Centralized discussion. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Would an admin assess the consensus at the RfC at Template talk:Rihanna singles#Template revamp (initiated 9 July 2012)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Would an admin assess the consensus at Talk:RT (TV network)#RFC: Is RT a reliable source as per WP:RS? (initiated 17 July 2012)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Vietnamese)#RfC on spelling (initiated 18 July 2012) and Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Vietnamese)#Other options? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Would an admin assess the consensus at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Archive 129#RFC: shall changes in beginning of sentence case be allowed in quotations? (initiated 24 July 2012)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Would an admin assess the consensus at Talk:List of vegans#RfC: Proposals for table format (initiated 20 July 2012)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Would an admin assess the consensus at Talk:Political activities of the Koch family#RfC: Should the article include funding college programs promoting free enterprise? (initiated 13 July 2012)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Would an admin assess the consensus at Talk:Azad Kashmir#Request for Comment (initiated 7 July 2012)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Would an admin assess the consensus at the merge/redirect RfC at Talk:St. Jimmy#RFC (initiated 16 July 2012)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Would an admin assess the consensus at the RfC at Talk:Plasma cosmology#Requests for comment 2 (permanent link because there are two sections titled "Requests for comment" on the page: link) (initiated 14 July 2012)? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Would an admin assess the consensus at the redirect discussions at Talk:Great consonant shift#Redirect discussions? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 22:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

    Would admins assess the consensus at:

    1. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dreduardoa/sandbox (initiated 24 July 2012)
    2. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Gun debates in article space (initiated 29 July 2012)
    3. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:List of paradoxes/articles containing paradox not in title 2009-11-14 (initiated 30 July 2012)
    4. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Hazir123 (initiated 30 July 2012)
    5. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Willurd/William Stewart Lawrence (initiated 31 July 2012)
    6. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject University of North Texas/Member userbox (initiated 31 July 2012)
    7. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Stefanhajek/I Am (2010 film) (initiated 2 August 2012)
    8. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mr pand/Compilations (initiated 5 August 2012)
    9. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:POVbrigand/list (initiated 5 August 2012)
    10. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Kolkata (2nd nomination) (initiated 8 August 2012)

    Thank you, Cunard (talk) 22:52, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]