Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

Note: This page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions nor to address the pending deletion of any page.

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as CSD G6), or in articles for deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other XfD processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions on the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

float

float

Enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Noor Aftab

• Noor Aftab · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

I believe that Wikipedia is a great resource for people across the world to get first hand accurate information on topics they need to know about. Noor Aftab is one of the most inspiring and dynamic women leaders of the East and she has accomplishments to back that. From the University of Curtin, with 189th international ranking the manager student affairs wrote to her "You are indeed an inspiration for business women world over". During the worst floods of 2010 in Pakistan that left 1/5th of the country under water her relief work got her international coverage and a organization none less than the stature of BBC covered her work as one of the women from Islamabad who put her life on hold to reach the flood victims. In addition her work is covered by Martha Vineyard times. Gavin Neath, the VP Global Communications of Uni lever wrote to Noor "I wish you every success in your fund raising efforts". Noor has been nominated for Mary Robinson award for her humanitarian work.

When she was 25, Noor managed a portfolio of $49.6 Billion. She managed Pakistan's largest conglomerate, Fauji Foundation's 18 businesses and was heading investments at a commercial bank in Pakistan. She was the co-chair of Pakistan Banker's association on SME & Microfinance. For a country like Pakistan faced with terrorism, floods and inflation, here is a brilliant young lady creating a micro finance revolution and working endlessly as Ambassador for Women Development, she has been invited to Abraaj at Celebration of Entreprenuership with 1200 participants to showcase her work in Nov, 2010. In December 2010, she was invited to a meeting of International Experts on Micro finance by C5, the european think tank to talk on women based micro financing. Noor's organization, Shahina Aftab Foundation (SAF) became the only organization in the Pakistan to be invited to the event. She is invited to US Microfinance Congress in May 2011 to talk on political risks in Micro financing and in Geneva with the Head of the Pakistan Stock Market, to talk on future of Microfinancing. For a lady whose work has been covered by local and international media whose proper links, sources are all provided and who the world is recognizing is not getting a chance at Wikipedia. I believe Wiki is not one to discriminate against race, gender or country of origin. And I am baffled why someone would delete the page? We are living in a tolerent world where everyone gets a chance. I request Wiki to investigate into this and give Noor's page back. All sources and resources were attached. And could be verified by a single google search. A speedy action on your end would give hope to hundreds of thousands of women across the globe. Wishing an amazing day to you and enormous success to Wiki -Raana.rizwan (talk) 05:39, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noor Aftab, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Ron Ritzman (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 06:21, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

This is a peculiar situation: an autobio by a male journalist was taken to AfD and received two delete !votes. Then, during the AFD, it was hijacked and completely rewritten to be about someone else - a female investment banker. In due course, at the end of the AfD, it was deleted. I have told Ron, as deleting admin, what happened and he has restored the new article. JohnCD (talk) 16:37, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Interesting. So the delete rationales were actually about the prior content? I think some trout slaps may be in order.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:48, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Consider me trouted. I didn't look at the article closely enough. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:37, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

No, trouting Ron is unfair because, whether by carelessness or intent to deceive, the edit which totally rewrote the article to be about a different person had as edit summary: "(Put in links, added dates and work experience!)" A deleting admin is not required to examine every revision in the history. JohnCD (talk) 17:37, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

I concede that a trout might be extreme but surely he can be asked to dance for our amusement?--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:06, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Temple Seeker

• Temple Seeker · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Temple Seeker was deleted under A7, but i don't understand why? Because A7 is supposedly for web contents articles, but Temple Seeker is an actual mobile game software that exists in real world not only in websites. I have read the A7 carefully and it said that "This criterion applies only to articles about web content and to articles about people, organizations, and individual animals themselves, not to articles about their books, albums, software, or other creative works." So please give me a reason why it is considered as a web content when it is not? And please un-delete Temple Seeker -Netm (talk) 03:50, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Have you tried bringing it up with the administrator that deleted the article, RHaworth? You have a valid point however as a rule we don't restore A7's here because we only do "uncontroversial" undeletions. I know it seems like an unnecessary bureaucratic step, however you should try talking to RHaworth about it. If he refuses to restore the page, you can always open a deletion review. l'aquatique[talk] 19:24, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Leo Rey

• Leo Rey · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I disagree that deleting an article like this, because it needs more info. -DO IT THE CHILEAN WAY!!! (talk) 04:07, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Not done - this page has not yet been deleted., and if you add a reference that sources the information, you can remove the blp prod template. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:06, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Template:Open_Audio_License

• Template:Open_Audio_License · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

While roughly equivalent, the licenses are different licenses, and we shouldn't use the wrong licence just because it's compatible with CC-by-SA. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 09:04, 1 March 2011 (UTC) -Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 09:04, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

see Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2011 January 11#Template:Open Audio License. Apparently it was unused. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:09, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

That log actually says "not widely used", which is very different. In any case, I want the template due to uploading a file using it, and because, with FS coming to the en-wiki mainpage, the license used by a large number of our Featured sounds needs to be supported here, since we need to keep a local copy while it's on the mainpage. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 14:44, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

ADITYA VAIDYA

• ADITYA VAIDYA · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

for information about the actor to the people -Sanyuktadh (talk) 12:11, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user Lectonar (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. l'aquatique[talk] 19:27, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Next One Up Foundation

• Next One Up Foundation · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This page was recently deleted because of alleged copyright infringement because it copied information from www.nextoneup.org. Civilization Systems (Username: CivSys) has been hired by Matt Hanna (owner of Next One Up Foundation) to create a wikipedia page mirroring the information presented on the company's website. We therefore have creative control of the content and are not infringing on any copyrights. Please contact <redacted> with any questions or concerns. I can be reached at <redacted>. Thank you. -CivSys (talk) 22:00, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

 Not done WP:PROMO, WP:COI, WP:CORP - even if an WP:OTRS ticket was submitted and accepted, this article fails the rest (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 00:29, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

(e/c) The fact that you assert you have permission to use the material is not enough to avoid deletion for two reasons. First, we can't simply take an anonymous person's assertion that they have authority over a copyright. You would need to show us that authority in a verifiable way. Second, we cannot use copyrighted content by permission to use. Instead the copyright holder either has to release the material into the public domain or under a free copyright license compatible with Wikipedia's. This is because our content is not just to be read but is licensed for reuse by our readers. Information on how to deal with these matters is given at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.On to additional matters.

Material on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view, using neutral language and giving proper proper weight to both positive and negative aspects of a topic. You, being paid to write a piece, are at the extreme end of those with a conflict of interest in posting material; not only are you incapable of writing neutrally (as can be seen from reviewing the panegyric you posted), but are beholden, for remuneration, to not write neutrally and in that regard, the article was not deleted for copyright infringement (though that was another reason to do so), it was deleted under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion as an article that was blatantly promotional. No article "mirroring the information presented on the company's website" is going to last for more than a few minutes on Wikipedia.

If it was up to me, all paid advertisers writing articles would be blocked on sight but the community has taken a middle ground, viewing you with the extreme suspicion and hot-potato caution you deserve. I follow that, albeit grudgingly. However, I was going to block your account indefinitely for another reason. You reveal yourself by your post to not be a single person but a role account, which is not allowed; another user, however, has already blocked your account.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:38, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Sussex_Airshow

• Sussex_Airshow · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This is article was deleted due to not having any links. I know there were links from the various performers and planes. They must have been edited out by others. It is relevant to the Sussex Airport in NJ so a link from there would be appropriate as well. -Doug14 (talk) 23:52, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

 Not done It was deleted for failing to have third party reliable sources for almost 4 years. The only external links were basically youtube videos, which are not permitted. There were a lot of links to performers and aircraft, but no reliable proof that they were ever at subject airshow. I also failed to see how the airshow itself was notable, other than for some minor fraud issues. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 00:27, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Bwilkins, as an expired PROD this should generally be restored on request and sent to AfD if you find it doesn't meet our inclusion guidelines. Hobit (talk) 18:26, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Miguel's Cocina y Cantina

• Miguel's Cocina y Cantina · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

it is an informative article about local business, not to sell -Grey jean (talk) 04:48, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

1). Article was deleted because of G11 unambiguous advertising 2). Article was met to inform not sell!

 Not done This was a clear case of WP:CSD#G11 - blatant advertising. It would need to be totally rewritten for inclusion as a legitimate article. See Wikipedia:Your first article and Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) for additional information. Skier Dude (talk) 04:55, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Kentucky locations by per capita income

• Kentucky locations by per capita income · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I am challenging the expired WP:PROD. -74.138.214.5 (talk) 20:47, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

• Done as a contested proposed deletion. Note that without any sources or indication that the topic itself is notable or useful in a navigational sense it may be sent to AfD. Protonk (talk) 21:58, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

WizzWave Corporation

• Wizzwave corporation · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I have not been told in detail why this page has been deleted and i would like some help if i have to prove something then please let me know for any thing else then please ask thanks?? -WizzWave (talk) 23:47, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. - Vianello (Talk) 00:09, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

File:TsavoTheSearchPromo.jpg

• File:TsavoTheSearchPromo.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This image is used for press releases for Tsavo LLP and we have sent an email to permissions@enwikimedia.org with fair use release contained. -Tsavomusic (talk) 23:57, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

The file has not been deleted: You need to add an {{OTRS pending}} note to its description page. As I see your account is currently blocked, I have done that for you. JohnCD (talk) 18:53, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Userify request

Can the following deleted pages please be userified so I can work on improving them? Thanks!

• Bomb-Burst
• Brainstorm (Transformers)
• Bumblebee (Transformers Animated)
• Chase (Transformers)
• Crumplezone
• Depth Charge (Transformers)

Mathewignash (talk) 01:01, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

• Working. Protonk (talk) 01:33, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
• Done. You may want to restore any redirects that still seem reasonable. Or if they are all ok to be restored as redirects leave a note here and I can restore them. Each article is in a sub-page of your userspace with th same article title. Protonk (talk) 01:40, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Lilly Wood and the Prick

• Lilly Wood and the Prick · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Music group which received an award on the french television. Please restore so that the source can be added. -Comte0 (talk) 06:12, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

I have userfied the content to User:Comte0/Lilly Wood and the Prick. Once you have added content, you can move it to the mainspace.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:47, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Noah Z. Jones

• Noah Z. Jones · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

AFD closed per WP:BLPPROD with all keep due to sources not being added to article . [1], [2], [3] were all identified in the discussion but I failed to add them to the article. I will add them after an undeletion.. -Whpq (talk) 14:04, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

 Done. JohnCD (talk) 18:08, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

PostPanic

• PostPanic · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I want to keep an objective history and background of this creative collective. I wrote this article and have no idea who deleted and why it was deleted. -Smarkula (talk) 16:22, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user Bennydigital (talk), who proposed it, in case he wishes to nominate it at Articles for deletion. The reason for proposing deletion was "No notable sources- brief search only brought up credits or their own website. Reads more like a CV than any notable content", and what the article needs most is references to show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. More advice on your talk page soon. JohnCD (talk) 18:28, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Rojhri Inside temple.jpg

• File:Rojhri Inside temple.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

please do not delete this image file.I have created this by my N72 camera.You can check by detail.I leave any copyright regarding image. I have metioned on page. -Shemaroo (talk) 16:24, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

The file has not been deleted, and the note on your talk page tells you what to do to have it kept, and gives you a link to a page where you can ask for help. JohnCD (talk) 17:33, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

The IDPPPA (S.3728)

• The IDPPPA (S.3728) · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Hi!

Would you consider reactivating the IDPPPA wiki page? It really is a more important bill than the wiki page made it out to be. 1. It is a hot topic of discussion/debate and articles are written posted about it everyday. The IDPPPA is a huge issue in the fashion industry and the field of intellectual property law and it is important to have a neutral open source of information about it. 2. It made substantial changes from previous drafts of the bill. 3. It made it further in the process than any previous bill. 4. It had support from long time opponents (unlike the previous versions). 5. The next bill introduced is likely to be substantially similar to the language of the IDPPPA so it is important to have a point of reference.

I can update the page substantially to reflect its importance and relevancy and add needed citations. -Oddlymanic (talk) 17:09, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

What is the exact title of the page you are asking about? We have never had an article IDPPPA or IDPPPA (s.3728) or any of the variations on that I have tried. Nor do I see anything like it among your deleted contributions. If you don't know the exact title, do you know the username of the account that submitted it? JohnCD (talk) 18:01, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

So sorry. It is The IDPPPA (S.3728). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_IDPPPA_(S.3728) Oddlymanic (talk) 18:35, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

That was deleted after a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The IDPPPA (S.3728), so it can't be restored here. If you think the discussion was wrongly decided, or you have new information, you should approach user Black Kite (talk), the administrator who closed the discussion. If he does not agree, you can go to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 18:41, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Colonel Richard T. Curry

• Colonel Richard T. Curry · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

this article has historical value to the State of Ohio's Military History and should be stored on wikipedia for future reseach and reading. References were provided and the individual has accomplished something that no other Officer in recent times has in the Ohio National Guard, those accomplishments are historical and meet the criteria for being worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia. the administrator who deleted the article has been non-responsive to my requests. -Bengal40 (talk) 19:43, 3 March 2011 (UTC) Bengal40 (talk) 19:43, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

• You have posted a request here about 3 times now. Each time you have been told that we will not summarily restore the article because it was speedily deleted. If the administrator has not responded to your request then you can make a post at deletion review and request the article be restored there. You can respond here but if you continue to re-post your request it will be reverted without comment. Protonk (talk) 20:28, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Across the Rhine

• Across the Rhine · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

looking for old pc game (1995) you guys (User:Ahoerstemeier) deleted in 2005 july 13,16:02 -84.111.7.142 (talk) 21:39, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

why was it deleted ? many thanks guy

The page Across the Rhine was set up as a redirect to 1944: Across the Rhine, and then two minutes later it was blanked by the user who created it, so it was deleted. There wasn't, and never has been, an article at "1944: Across the Rhine." So, sorry, it looks as though we have never had an article about this game. JohnCD (talk) 22:18, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Kuba soltysiak

• Kuba soltysiak · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Sorry, my mistake I saved the page before adding a source. And after adding my sources, I got the message that the page was up for deletion. -Lolzbirdz (talk) 00:26, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

 Not done. Although the page had a BLPprod notice saying that it would be deleted in ten days unless sources were added, the actual reason for speedy deletion was WP:CSD#A7: a page that "does not indicate why its subject is important or significant." If you want it restored, you should approach user OrangeMike (talk), the administrator who deleted it, but I have to say that this young man's career (internet videos, internet raps, working on a CD) does not seem (yet) to be anywhere near the level required for a Wikipedia article. I will give you links to some guidelines on your talk page. JohnCD (talk) 11:05, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Delmark Records

• Delmark Records · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

A label that exists since 1953 and has since released hundreds of records (Lps and CDs, DVDs) of notable blues and jazz artists just cannot lack 'notability', but rather the article lacks proof of notability - I'm willing to add what maybe has to be added to prove its notability ! -StefanWirz (talk) 10:33, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user Rhokel Smith (talk), who proposed it, in case he wishes to consider nominating it at WP:Articles for deletion. See WP:CORP for what is required to show notability. JohnCD (talk) 10:44, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Sree sakthi engineering college

• Sree sakthi engineering college · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

college article -Sreehariy (talk) 15:38, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

 Not done - there was no substantial content to restore. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:09, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Kay Sloan

• Kay Sloan · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Published author -75.65.214.81 (talk) 23:11, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kay Sloan, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Scott MacDonald (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 23:19, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_World_Mindset

• New_World_Mindset · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I would like to receive a copy of the article and re-create it in the Sand box, with the chance to attach more references to it. Thank you, Anca Sovarosi -KFT (talk) 02:29, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Done I've sent this via mail. I don't see this becoming an article, though, so I'll post some more links on your talk page.--Tikiwont (talk) 16:22, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

File talk:NYC subway riders with their newspapers.jpg

• File talk:NYC subway riders with their newspapers.jpg · ( logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Necessary to prove permission, linked from file description page on Commons. -— Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 02:46, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

• Its been restored by Protonk. It looks like email release was obtained by User:Nv8200p in 2007 but not registered with OTRS. I suggest you get Nc8200p to forward the email if they still have it to OTRS to have the release properly recorded. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:11, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Padmashri P.R.Krishnakumar

• Padmashri P.R.Krishnakumar · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

factual account of a very prominent person in field of Ayurveda in Inida who has singlehandedly revived Ayurveda's global stature through far reaching tie ups at the international and national level with governments and private individuals.His organization has been featured in PBS on American Television as well. -68.99.178.63 (talk) 07:03, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

• Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user Toddst1 (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.. I'm not sure I personally agree that this qualified for an A7. I would have declined but your redress is via the admin - who may be on wikibreak - or listing this at DRV. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:15, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Alejandro Alcondez

• Alejandro Alcondez · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

Hi I started the article about 3 years ago, trying to meet wikipedia guidelines as best I could I'm requesting the article about Actor Alejandro Alcondez to be undeleted, originaly it was taken down because of notability issues User talk:Cgomez007 and the outcome Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alejandro Alcondez, I'm requesting the article be admited as a wikipedia article, I have seen plenty of information about this actor on the web, I managed to include plenty of third party references to support notability. Here's the work in progress article I request be added: My user page, I thank you for your time. -Cgomez007 (talk) 10:31, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Not done - Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alejandro Alcondez (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process which is intended for uncontroversial restorations. As you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may want to bring your draft to deletion review, noting that the the administrator who closed the discussion, user MBisanz (talk · contribs), isn't currently active . --Tikiwont (talk) 16:34, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Gareth Herincx

• Gareth Herincx · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

This page has existed on Wikipedia for some years and it's never been a problem up until now. The subject is referenced as a "notable alumni" of Harlow College along with Piers Morgan and Mark Knopfler. Also articles written by Gareth Herincx when working at BBC News Online are listed as "references" on pages including The World Is Not Enough Bond film and the US actress Denise Richards. Finally, he's also mentioned as the launch editor of a national games magazine, Zero. He's now the New Media Editor of ITV Breakfast. -79.66.215.157 (talk) 15:05, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Nevertheless, the problems of the page, namely it being an unreferenced biography of a living person of unclear notability have been indicated for over a year and unless they are addressed soon, the page will likely be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. --Tikiwont (talk) 17:04, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Tim Browne

• Tim Browne · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

to better meet the requirements as described in the deletion review -75.68.86.169 (talk) 20:31, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

I guess you are referring to the deleting admins advice.[4]. Now I can't simply put it back but could restore that to your user space to prepare a draft for deltion review if you have an account. Let me know. --Tikiwont (talk) 11:55, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Yes, please and thank you.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ver2 (talk • contribs)

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Ver2/Tim Browne.--Tikiwont (talk) 20:42, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

The Writers' Collective

• The Writers' Collective · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This page was apparently deleted because it was advertising, which is was not; there is nothing promotional about the page itself, as it simply provides information. It's a page with information about a local group that supports writers. Since an almost idential group, The Manitoba Writers' Guild], has its own page, I thought it fitting that The Writers' Collective did as well. I am not affiliaited with The Writers' Collective in any way, so I am not promoting the organization. Being in advertising myself, I cannot possible see how the article was at all an 'advertisement.' If a word or two here and there seems promotional, surely it is a better practice to just edit those words out? -Leighann7 (talk) 20:58, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Well this board isn't really for reviewing deletions. Which means that you can either bring this up with the deleting administrator, JamesBWatson (talk · contribs), or work the page over first. Let me know in case you need the draft back. In any case it needs to meet our notability guideline on organizations as any other organization including the Manitoba Writers' Guild. --Tikiwont (talk) 18:00, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Mihalis Safras

• Mihalis Safras · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

The 2008 Pole we were reffering was a voting of the greek dj magazine named pole. this is now not available. there are available scanned proffs but so how can we clear this from the text? -Mihalissafras (talk) 12:56, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

See post below. --Tikiwont (talk) 13:38, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

ATI Tray Tools

• ATI Tray Tools · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Because article definitly wasn't "Unencyclopedic spam". It was about very useful freeware utility for advanced configuration of ATI Cards. -84.42.238.218 (talk) 19:29, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

• Done as a contested proposed deletion. Note that the price or the usefulness of a subject doesn't actually impact the characterization of an article as unencyclopedic or "spam". This article requires some sourcing from third-party reliable sources in order to really secure a place here. Right now there are only links to download sites and the product web page. Protonk (talk) 23:40, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Hoshimanga

• Hoshimanga · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

it does not promote the webisteit provides information on the page.-Hoshisekai (talk) 19:34, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning websites. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. --Tikiwont (talk) 14:54, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Cost pool

• Cost pool · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

To restore article deleted as an uncontested prod -Onthegogo (talk) 04:28, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Done by Protonk. --Tikiwont (talk) 14:51, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

mihalis safras

• Mihalis Safras · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

The reason that was actually proposed for deletion was that the source of DJmag pole was not reachable. We edit to remove the specific part but now a tag A& is tag on the article. The reason we submit the article is that the artist we submitting as seen in the www.discogs.com has the unofficial record of 'most productive producer' between 2007-2009 (vinyl wise) 32 vinyl records in infamous labels was the record that was credited to him from discogs admins. plus the pole you are refering that is unavailable is a press voting in newspaper. plus the artist has one of the most successful labels in techno muic -Mihalissafras (talk) 12:48, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

While originally a proposed deletion, you've contested this in parallel with above post also by recreating the article without the claim and it has meanwhile been deleted according to the speedy deletion criterion A7 since the reposted draft did not mention any of above and was in fact almost empty. Now as it is possibly notable, I'll restore the prodded article but please review our guidelines on and Autobiographies as well as the other links on your page. It is probably best to let the community move on from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mihalis Safras. --Tikiwont (talk) 13:57, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

josh t pearson

• File:Last_Of_The_Country_Gentlemen.jpg · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

work on behalf of the aritst and so have full rights to use the images on behalf of the label and the artist. -Sasalap (talk) 13:02, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. We can't simply take your word on it, nor would this be necessary for a fair use claim. You need to work through the links on your page including a COI notice that I'm going to post there.--Tikiwont (talk) 16:53, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Erin Zhu

• Erin Zhu · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

She is a notable figure and I think that she should have a page. I was shocked to see that there was once a page for her that has since been deleted. She is noted on her husband and her fathers wiki pages and yet does not have a page of her own. I think its shocking that she once had one and it has since been deleted. Lots of people that are less famous, infamous or simply have a lot of geeky friends have a wiki page and the wife of one of the great musicians doesnt. -83.208.138.227 (talk) 17:48, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

 Not done. This article was deleted after a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erin Zhu so, as stated at the head of this page, it canot be restored here. If you think the deletion debate was wrongly decided, or you have new information, you should approach user Mailer Diablo (talk), the administrator who closed the debate. Then, if you are not satisfied, you can go to WP:Deletion review. But note that, in Wikipedia's view, just being related to notable people does not make someone notable, and "less famous people have an article so she should have one" is not an argument that is accepted - each case is assessed on its own merits. JohnCD (talk) 19:13, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

The Road to Shambala

• The Road to Shambala · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

We are still in the process of learning how to develop a Wiki page,as it is the first one we have created. We ask you to return our page so we may continue working and learning. Also, any advise and/or help of any kind would be appreciated. The instructions are technical and we are a team of students and one teacher, and for the most part, do not comprehend the supplied instruction pages. Please help us, if you will. -Eliiscoming (talk) 21:55, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Category:Biologic surnames

• PageName · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -Oncifer (talk) 02:12, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Category:Biologic surnames - Template:Lc1

Category:Animal surnames - Template:Lc1

Category:Botanical surnames - Template:Lc1

Category:Piscine surnames - Template:Lc1

Category:Avian surnames - Template:Lc1

This deletion requests was started from administrator's ill will, malice, lack of understanding. No any legitimacy to deletion, and request for deletion. These categories are very stub, just started now, and has possiblies. --Oncifer (talk) 02:12, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Kyuki Do

WARNING: you did not submit your request correctly!

You need to replace the "PageName" parameter of the template with the name of the page that you would like restored, spelled correctly, with proper case. Please click the "[edit]" link to the right, and replace the contents of this section with:

{{subst:refund|The name of the requested page|your reasoning for asking to undelete it}}

• PageName · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -75.175.135.167 (talk) 06:09, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

This page was an accurate history and description of an existing martial art, it's founder, and related articles that has been taught to tens of thousands of people all over the United States for the past 30+ years. It continues on...

Sincerely,

Concerned Martial Artists...