Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions nor to address the pending deletion of any page.

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as CSD G6), or in articles for deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other XfD processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions on the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

float

float

Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

tabikap

• Tabikap · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

The article was deleted for not having references and I found one: www.sotscm.org -Psa3rvb (talk) 23:35, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/A7

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 —Jeremy v^_^v ^{Components:V S M} 07:09, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

• Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. it was not speedy deleted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:11, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Now deleted as a copyright violation. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:22, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Comparison of Windows and Linux

• Comparison of Windows and Linux · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Hi. I was wondering if it is possible to userify this article to my email address. I need small portions of it for another article but I have a hard time finding them with Bing. I do acknowledge the fact that this article has been a subject of three AfDs in the past and I promise I will not cause any trouble in that respect. Thanks in advance. -Fleet Command (talk) 18:12, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Done Userfication will not be easy as a bigdelete permission is required. Are you happy to get one revision + attribution list? I have emailed it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:36, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

Well, I am perfectly happy with what I received – thanks a lot – though I make neither head nor tail of what you said. I guess I had better steer clear of the word "Userification" in the future. Fleet Command (talk) 09:04, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Userfication would be to restore it as User:FleetCommand/Comparison of Windows and Linux. This would require a steward to do this undelete as it has so many revisions in its history. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:05, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Jesse Dirkhising image

Hello. I would like the deleted image for the article Murder of Jesse Dirkhising restored. The image of Jesse was nominated and deleted here [1]. No mention of its nomination or deletion was ever discussed on the talk page for the article. Furthermore, there was no consensus for it being deleted by User:Fastily in the first place. The nominee (User:SchuminWeb) claimed it was a non-free image, yet the media used the same picture for years. How are we to get free images from a murder victim? It's not possible. I see a disturbing double standard here. Why keep non-free images such as: File:Matthew Shepard.jpg and File:LawrenceFobesKing.jpg and not Jesse Dirkhising? Those last two are not free images so why keep them? If Jesse can be deleted for not being free, then Matthew and Larry must also be deleted for the exact same reasons. Otherwise please restore the image of Jesse Dirkhising. Thank you. Caden ^cool 23:07, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

• Restore and relist for broader discussion. The image meets 9 of the 10 WP:NFCC (including WP:NFCC#1 -- portraits of dead people are assumed to meet this, and especially so in this case). The argument is that it does not meet WP:NFCC#8 ("would significantly increase readers' understanding"). Do portraits meet WP:NFCC#8 or are they merely decorative? I don't know. It's arguable that they do, I think. It would be very simple to resolve this kind of issue by adding (something like) the following to WP:NFCC#8: "Portraits are assumed to not meet this criterion, absent some extraordinary circumstance". (An extraordinary circumstance would be Cyrano de Bergerac for instance). The absence of such a clause indicates that the matter is not settled. The precedent cited was Caylee Anthony and that was contentious. I will bring this up presently at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content and perhaps we can get consensus that portraits don't meet WP:NFCC#8, but in the meantime this warrants a re-discussion. Herostratus (talk) 01:16, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

The RfC is here: Wikipedia talk:Non-free content#RFC: Clarifying policy on pictures of deceased persons Herostratus (talk) 02:37, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Geez, Herostratus ... you've never been to WP:REFUND before? We don't work like WP:DRV so save those argument styles for WP:DRV. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:01, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

@Herostratus. Thank you for the RFC. @BWilkins. Wow! Caden ^cool 20:42, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

@Bwilkins -- you're right. No, I haven't been here before, to my recollection. You're right, this should be at DRV and not Requests for Undeletion, so I'll move the discussion there, and in the meantime this can be thread can be closed, if I understand aright. Herostratus (talk) 06:19, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Surnames_of_Shivalli_Madhwa_Brahmins

• Surnames_of_Shivalli_Madhwa_Brahmins · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Being a Shivalli Brahmin myself, I can vouch that most of these names do exist. I am pasting a link here of my source. http://shivallibrahmins.com/history/%EF%BB%BFfamily-names-history-of-shivalli-brahmin-community -IndiPirate (talk) 23:34, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Notability, not existence. —Jeremy v^_^v ^{Components:V S M} 03:16, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:43, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

The Grinning Man

• The Grinning Man · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

The article regarding the cryptid was ignorantly deleted by Robsinden when he moved the Jonathan Creek episode of the same title into this space. Now, the history has been converted to the episode's history, not the previous cryptid article's, so it can't be reverted. There was an extensive discussion about the cryptid article's notability in which it was agreed that it was notable, so it didn't just get deleted, it got overwritten by someone not paying attention. I hope we can get the old article back. Thank you. Geeky Randy (talk) 04:19, 8 November 2011 (UTC) -Geeky Randy (talk) 04:19, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Not correct, Robsinden moved the JC episode article to what at the time was a red link. The article on the cryptid was deleted two months prior to that as a result of this AFD discussion. I think you owe Robsinden an apology. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:34, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

For future reference, how do I dig that kind of information up? Do I have to sort through endless pages of AfD articles, or can I search for it to make the process quicker? Geeky Randy (talk) 00:10, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Just be aware that non-admins can't move articles on top of other articles. If you see something like this in the future just check the logs for the page which can be accessed from the "history" tab. In the case of this article, it will show that it was deleted before the current article was moved in its place. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:59, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Bubble Babble

• Bubble Babble · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

I would like a copy of it in my userspace, or alternatively it emailed to me, so that I can merge it with other pages and create something more useful. -Allens (talk) 05:56, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

•  Not done I have explained on my talkpage. Spartaz ^Humbug! 08:13, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • I see. I'd like a copy in my userspace, or it emailed to me, for my personal usage (including but not limited to future policy discussions of changes/clarifications of what is considered a reliable source). There isn't any question of copyright violation or libelous material against a living person, so I trust you'll do this. Allens (talk) 15:20, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
•  Done I have e-mailed a copy of the article - it would not have been appropriate to userfy it, as it was AFD'd, and "userfy" was not the consensus at the time (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 15:48, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Michael Capponi

• Michael Capponi · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The page was proposed for deletion by November 7 for describing the article as acting like a reference. G11 was referenced as a reason for speedy deletion on November 7 before changes could be made. I am a supporter and contributor to this article and there have been numerous verifiable references to the article that have been cited. I created the page initially and others had also been adding to this page. Also the page has been up for over 6 months, and yesterday I added another page Capponi Construction Group that may have appeared to have been written like an advertisement and was linked to this page (because it said this page Michael Capponi was an orphan) so I created the Capponi Construction Group page since this is one of the companies this individual owns. -Cometcomputing (talk) 06:40, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/A7

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G11

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G12

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G4

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/U5

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G10

User:Jéské Couriano/REFUND/Ineligible speedy/G5 Note that the inclusion of sources has no bearing on a G11 deletion. —Jeremy v^_^v ^{Components:V S M} 19:35, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Would you be able to restore it temporarily or to draft mode so I can at least grab the content off so I can revise it? Thank you. Mryayo8 (talk) 21:26, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

I'm not an admin myself, however one could email the contents to you. —Jeremy v^_^v ^{Components:V S M} 23:39, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

What a piece of junk advertising. He's not notable without the article below, and even that's pushing it. So, you can either work on the one below and include Micheal and try and create something valid, or this specific article. I would not be willing to allow this back on Wikipedia servers, even in draft mode all considering. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 23:43, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

It's not advertising or meant to be advertising, it was a list of all his accomplishments and he is a known celebrity in south beach as well as a philanthropist. Could you at least email the content to me so I can re-write parts of it or provide a draft so we can see the references? Thanks that way I don't have to start over, I had been adding to this article over the last 6 months and haven't really had any issues with it. Michael has done some pretty amazing things for the community and south beach in general. Please help out a fellow Canadian wise BWilkins, much appreciated! If you could provide any guidance that would be greatly appreciated since it looks like you have been on Wikipedia for a long time, and it would be great to learn how to write articles properly. Mryayo8 (talk) 04:36, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

I was the admin who deleted the article, and I am emailing you the text, which I think will meet your requirements. You didn't even have to come here--had you asked me on my talk page, I would have done it. (I think it would need such total rewriting that there's no point in putting it in user space as is--it will be better to use some of the references and a small amount of the material to write it from scratch.) In my opinion, he's notable, so there is no reason why it should not be possible to write a satisfactory article, and the possibility of doing so will be much greater if you start over. I've started a page for the purpose in your userspace at User:Mryayo8/Michael Capponi with the infobox, so you will not have to code it over again. Please see your user talk page for some advice about how to improve it; I'm perfectly willing to do anything reasonable to assist you, if you rewrite in good faith. DGG ( talk ) 04:54, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you DGG very much appreciated, so I can start working on this. Mryayo8 (talk) 05:08, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Capponi Construction Group

• Capponi Construction Group · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The page was proposed for deletion by November 7 for describing the article as acting like a reference. G11 was referenced as a reason for speedy deletion on November 7 before changes could be made. I am a supporter and contributor to this article and there have been numerous verifiable references to the article that have been cited. I created the page initially and should have left it in draft mode since there was more information I needed to add to it, but it was seen as written like an advertisement. Please restore to a draft mode so I can make the edits necessary. -Cometcomputing (talk) 06:43, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

• Google cache shows only one reference (a press release) and the article would need improvement to survive AFD but it doesn't look like "unambiguous advertising or promotion". Peter E. James (talk) 06:56, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

 Done Userfied at User:Cometcomputing/Capponi Construction Group. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:47, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

as your user name has changed, It's been moved to User:Mryayo8/Capponi Construction Group DGG ( talk ) 04:55, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Bill Ufo Hunter

• Bill Ufo Hunter · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The article is about a film -Baratus (talk) 15:02, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Seems that the article is going to be deleted because is an information about a website, but is not like that. The information that I wrote in wikipedia is about a 3D animation shortfilm. Its true that i didnt put more links about the film, but is because Imdb didnt include the film yet. Anyway, Imdb.com go to include this film in their website. This film is not so famous, and there is not many articles about the film in internet (i didnt saw very much things about it), but this is not free publicity about a website, is just information about a film. I hope that you can see it. Other reason because there is not many information is because is a totally free shortfilm, is not a commercial movie, but I think that is not a reason to delete the article. A greeting.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Baratus (talk • contribs)

Not done - this is not an appropriate topic for inclusion on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Wikipedia does not accept original research or articles for which there do not exist reliable sources of information. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:15, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Not to mention IMDb is not a reliable source and thus is unusable here. —Jeremy v^_^v ^{Components:V S M} 19:33, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

Terry Daniels

• Terry Daniels · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Heavyweight Boxer who fought Joe Frazier and is linked on Joe Fraziers page. page is a proposed deletion -162.111.235.34 (talk) 15:49, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

•  Not done The article was deleted five years ago, and could not be undeleted now as it would violate WP:BLP ... there's not a single reference on the article. Someone could, perhaps, create a new article with proper references. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 15:52, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
  • I'm forced to agree. The deleted article was an unsalvageable BLP and POV nightmare, However, any logged in editor is free to write a new sourced article from a neutral point of view. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:28, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

FuturLab

• FuturLab · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

CSD A7 claimed but notability likely: [2], [3], User talk:Kalvinlyle#Speedy deletion nomination of FuturLab. --- Trevj (talk) 10:07, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Minor nitpick here. A7 is about "importance or significance" not "notability". The entire article read FuturLab is a game development company in Brighton, UK. They made Coconut Dodge. The only thing this tells you is that this is a "game development company" that made something called "coconut dodge". (what is coconut dodge) I would have tagged/deleted this as A7 too. I suspect that if you were to write another article stating what makes this company significant and/or what sets it apart from all the other game development companies, it would not be tagged for A7 (or if it was the tag should be declined). --Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:47, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Max Kaur (Jermakov)

• Max Kaur (Jermakov) · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

This article was deleted despite the discussion with given questions and provided facts. We see that discussion transformed in constructive to political debate. Max Kaur (Jermakov) meets the requirements: This man is involved into Estonian politics for at least 15 years. Former vice-mayor of the town of Maardu. At the moment, this politician is a Chairman of the Law Enforcement Commission of the City Council of the Capital of Estonia (both it is a serious position considering that Tallinn is the Cultural Capital of Europe, 2011). Just to mention - Mr. Kaur was political advisor of the head of the popular party "Centre Party" Mr. Edgar Savisaar (I am not trying to use invalid criteria "That person A has a relationship with well-known person B", but I would like to mention that he was Estonian Prime minister from 1990 to 1992, got most of the votes at Parliament elections in 2011, at the moment - mayor of Capital of Estonia, ). He is most mentioned person of "Centre Party" in press. While the article and the politian we talk about met the requirements of "notability", our opponents started to use such expressions like "youth section of centre party", "small-time politician", "yellow journalism garbage", "his supporters should show up here... but this doesn't mean we need take what they say seriously" etc. It is absolutely non-professional and non-encyclopedic. We aren't discussing people. The article is about the well-respected man who is very famous in Tallinn and the main state of Estonia - Harjumaa, leading Institute of Society Development and giving lectures in ECOMEN institute in Tallinn. Moreover, this person has recommended himself on international area as a solid man, presenting Estonia in serious Worldwide organizations like International Human Rights Movement "World Without Nazism" (has offices Bruxelles, Moscow etc..), making lectures and reports - people of Estonia proud of such persons. I saw a lack of neutralism and justice while discussion. It was very abusively for me to hear such words like "supporter from youth section of party" from participants of so named discussion (it looked like a political debate). With a hope, I ask moderators to return the article. -Johannes xz (talk) 19:31, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Not done Should have been brought up with Spartaz and has now been listed at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 November 9. --Tikiwont (talk) 20:00, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Warrior-1 MMA

• Warrior-1_MMA · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

We were in the middle of a corporate restructuring and until now I was unaware this page existed. I am the new CIO of W-1 MMA and I would like the chance to fix what ever was incorrect on the wiki article. Please restore it for us. -70.54.222.122 (talk) 19:51, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi there! The article was deleted because of a 'lack of notability'. Do you know of any secondary sources that could be added to the page? Cheers, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 00:57, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:37, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Sevonica

• Sevonica · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because Sevonica is tied historically and currently to many other bands in the Memphis, Austin and Los Angeles music scene. This not only includes current and past bands but also successful producers, management and labels. Sevonica is a key piece to the early 2000's post core music scene and modern alternative rock scene. It's members have worked with multi-platinum selling artists such as Guns N Roses and Jackyl. It's past members are signed to licensing deals with MTV. To claim Sevonica is not musically relevant is to claim that any newer group that still has been able to perform at the acclaimed SXSW and digitally distribute a professional product is only relevant if they sell gold records. In this day and age that should no longer be the bar at which a band's relevance is judged. What is relevant is the body of work it's members have completed over many years and that influence on other bands and the industry itself. Additionally, WIKI has many bands that are unsigned and with much less content that this article. I am confident you will find this Sevonica article is well written and the sources are legitimate. You can only expect this article to grow over time along with those associated with it.

Thank you very much! Jason Babin -Mbabin1978 (talk) 20:04, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.. Relationships or not, notability is WP:NOTINHERITED (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 01:42, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Not to belabor the point, but how is the following act more relevant to music and therefore maintains an article? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jos%C3%A9_James

They have even fewer sources. Sevonica itself has attained as much credibility as this aforementioned article with SXSW and album releases alone. The sources are additionally valid within the Sevonica article. I mean, don't make me trout you! This is legitimate.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Mbabin1978 (talk • contribs) — Mbabin1978 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

The present existence of one article does not in any way justify the existence of any other article; see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. If you think that other article fails our standards, then go ahead and nominate it for possible deletion. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:39, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

"If you think that other article fails our standards, then go ahead and nominate it for possible deletion. " ...looks like I'm going to be busy ; )

TinyRa1n

• TinyRa1n · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -1966bataman (talk) 01:28, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

I'm fed up with this Speedy Deletion, All this Article tells you is about my service!!!!

•  Not done ...and I'm fed up with WP:SPAM :-) (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 01:40, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Localization Industry Standards Association

• Localization Industry Standards Association · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This trade body has recently folded and removed all of it's content from the web (the domain name has expired and been purchased by an ad farm). It has played a role in the creation of a number of standards (such as ISO 12620). I believe that is was notable and that I can find sources for the page. Could the page please be userfied please? -Stuartyeates (talk) 07:24, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

 Done to User:Stuartyeates/Localization Industry Standards Association. This was actually a PROD and could have been restored directly, but it is in such poor shape (a single sentence plus a link to their defunct web-site) that I have userfied it for you to improve - hardly worth digging up, but the history should be preserved. There is actually a rather fuller Russian article at ru:Localization Industry Standards Association, but that doesn't look as though it wil be a lot of help to you either. JohnCD (talk) 11:59, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

I have raised this to the level of a well-sourced stub and move it back to the main article space, see Localization Industry Standards Association. Feedback welcome. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:42, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Zedbazi

• Zedbazi · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -Sonax (talk) 20:21, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Not done - this page is a copyright violation of http://wewantzedbazi.com/#about. --Orange Mike | Talk 21:15, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

wyandotte art fair

• Wyandotte Art Fair · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

significance -Jimbob1122 (talk) 23:52, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

This event was deleted due to promotion. this page was not put on wikipedia for any promotional purpose. It is significant to the area of detroit and southeast michigan, due to the fact that it is the largest art fair of its kind in the area and is 51 years old. Many communities really this site for information for many subjects and events. so we think this would be a great spot to put information on the fair here about the history and what types art is celebrated here.

Thank you for your consideration,

James Roberts

 Not done The article was deleted because it had two edits: one was to create it, the second was by the same person who then completely blanked it. The article itself was unreferenced (other than its own website, which does not count), showed not signs of notability ... in other words, did not meet Wikipedia requirements. If you wish to create a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT of something that might pass our requirements for en encylopedia article, then please feel free to try (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 00:04, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Barry "Reazar" Richards

• Barry "Reazar" Richards · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -EliBrown6 (talk) 01:29, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Requesting that this page not be deleted. Subject is an important character in the development of the music business in his native Washington DC as well as other parts of the country. His television archive is among the most important music footage from the period 1968-1985, and is only now being re-discovered by the masses.

The page Barry "Reazar" Richards is unlikely to be salvageable unless in-depth, independent third party coverage of them can be found, see WP:MUSICBIO and WP:RS. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:47, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Not done, article has not been deleted. I removed a BLPPROD as sources have been added, but I've listed it at WP:Copyright problems as it's taken from the subject's Facebook page. January (talk) 09:41, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Pyromania.ogg, File:DiaryOfAnUnbornChild.ogg

• File:Pyromania.ogg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]
• File:DiaryOfAnUnbornChild.ogg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Can I have my amusing little files back please for my own personal enjoyemnt? Willothewisp (talk) 11:34, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

•  Not done Both files were deleted more than 5 years ago. Files/pages on Wikipedia are to exist solely for the purpose of contributing to the encylopedia, and not for personal amusement. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:15, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Pure bending

• Pure bending · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Pure Bending; this is a topic in mechanical engineering and needs some description. It is not in the Wikidictionary etc. and in fact Wikipedia is the ideal place for it to be described. I believe (but do not know) that it is when a plate is bent only through edge moments... ie, twisting at the edges. I don't know what the original article may have had in it but would like to know. -108.32.14.27 (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

•  Done. It seems that the twcleanup tag was added by a bot 2 years ago but it was never actually transwikied. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:11, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

capital cup national undergraduate mooting tournament

• Capital Cup National Undergraduate Mooting Tournament · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This event is completely non-profit and is notable because it is among the first of its kind in Canada since it's not for professional law students. The article isn't "advertising" anything... it's informative and is meant as a reference point for people interested in mooting in general. It has also been reviewed by two other users who've helped with adding links etc. to make it fit Wikipedia's standards. -EricOntario (talk) 08:12, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

The author of this article has clearly a conflict of interest in this, seeing his personal attack on User talk:Night of the Big Wind#Capital Cup Speedy Deletion [redacted link to linkedin page]. Secondly, the tournament had only one edition yet. Thirdly, the tournament has only 68 hits on internet (was 107), including fora, the own website, facebook, linkedin and twitter. And 0 (zero) hits on Google News. Completely not notable and worth the speedy deletion for being an advertisement. Night of the Big Wind _talk 09:14, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

• Comment Does not appear to meet general notability guidelines. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 10:13, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

• Not done - this is not an appropriate topic for inclusion on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Wikipedia does not accept original research or articles for which there do not exist reliable sources of information. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:14, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Gianfelice Rocca.jpg

• File:Gianfelice Rocca.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Per OTRS 2011102610004229. Please after restore insert {{PermissionOTRS|id=2011102610004229}} and move to commons. Thanks in advance! -Béria Lima ^msg 13:30, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

• • Done — Joseph Fox 13:58, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

International Cities of Peace

• International Cities of Peace · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Per OTRS 2011102610008476. Please after restore insert {{PermissionOTRS|id=2011102610008476}} in the talk page. Thanks in advance! -Béria Lima ^msg 13:33, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

• • Done — Joseph Fox 13:58, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Ryan M. Lance

• Ryan M. Lance · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

Per OTRS 2011102610022629. Please after restore insert {{PermissionOTRS|id=2011102610022629}} in the talk page. Thanks in advance! - Béria Lima ^msg 13:43, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

• • Done — Joseph Fox 13:58, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Campaign reformation movement

• Campaign reformation movement · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The page was deleted for not stating it's importance WHEN The page actually stated its importance as being a page on a group that has a heavy influence in the Occupy Detroit Movement. Even when another and I contested the deletion stating it's importance, the page was still deleted. It made me susceptible that no one had actually read the page or the talk page. I understand if the page were put up for speedy deletion just to see if Those that have put effort into creating it would defend it, but we were deleted for an invalid purpose. Please put the page back up so society can understand the group's goals and intentions. -Mudeater101 (talk) 19:36, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia isn't a soapbox for you to announce your great cause. —Jeremy v^_^v ^{Components:V S M} 19:44, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

•  Not done As above. WP:NOTTHEM arguments don't go well in undeletion discussions either (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:12, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

I'm not trying to preach out as if Wikipedia were a "soapbox", I posted the page so people could understand the group. If you suspect it to be written in a biased way, then suggest where I should edit the page, not automatically delete the page. Mudeater101 (talk) 06:13, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Frank Addante

• Frank Addante · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This page was deleted without discussion and the user (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pastor_Theo) who deleted it's account has been blocked (reason: This account is a sock puppet of Ecoleetage and has been blocked indefinitely.) Frank Addante is a well-known blogger (www.FounderBlog.com), inventor of early Internet and advertising technologies, patent holder, prominent figure/speaker/thought leader in online advertising technology, E&Y Entrepreneur of the Year and a case study written by Harvard is now part of the Harvard Business School's standard curriculum (http://hbr.org/product/frank-addante-serial-entrepreneur/an/809046-PDF-ENG) and is regularly quoted in publications such as Wall Street Journal, Fortune, Forbes, etc.}} This page was deleted without discussion and the user (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pastor_Theo) who deleted it's account has been blocked (reason: This account is a sock puppet of Ecoleetage and has been blocked indefinitely.)

Frank Addante is a well-known blogger (www.FounderBlog.com), inventor of early Internet and advertising technologies, patent holder, prominent figure/speaker/thought leader in online advertising technology, E&Y Entrepreneur of the Year and a case study written by Harvard is now part of the Harvard Business School's standard curriculum (http://hbr.org/product/frank-addante-serial-entrepreneur/an/809046-PDF-ENG) and is regularly quoted in publications such as Wall Street Journal, Fortune, Forbes, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.254.42.158 (talk • contribs)

•  Not done The current status of the deleting admin means zero in the case of deletions. First, this deletion occurred more than 2 years ago. Second, the article was horrifically self-promotional. A registered user would be fine creating a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT, trying to meet Wikipedia requirements, but they should have it reviewed before making it a live article. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:11, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Ricky Little

• Ricky Little · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

He played for Partick Thistle in the First Division, and is captain of Scotland's oldest club - http://www.ptfc.co.uk/team/ricky_little -Salty1984 (talk) 02:15, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

• Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:08, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Juan Pablo Camacho

• Juan Pablo Camacho · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The article was deleted on February with the reason "Expired PROD, concern was: Is being the first person of a given nationality to be born in the Antarctic notable?", I not only feel that the subject is notable, but also reason given did not cite any guidelines or supply a proper excuse, I feel I could improve the article and expand upon it if it could be moved into my userspace for reconstruction, I have potential references, User:Phoenix B 1of3/Juan Pablo Camacho would be my preferred location. -– Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 02:51, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

• Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Phoenix B 1of3/Juan Pablo Camacho.. Based on the current article, they certainly do not meet notability guidelines, and it's an unreferenced WP:BLP. I have, however, userfied this on your request (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:00, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Melanie Fontana

We can substatiate ALL information in the Melanie Fontana biography that was WRONGLY removed for "unsighted" sources??

Please repost. Questions? Write (Redacted)

Melanie Fontana management 70.188.174.198 (talk) 05:18, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Malformed Request - please use {{subst:refund|pageName|reasoning}} (replacing pagename with the name of the page you wish to have restored and reasoning with the reason for your request).. To top it off there are two concerns that must be addresses: #1) conflict of interest...and #2) the biographies of living persons requires valid, third part references for any biography of a living person, and none of the references in the article met that requirement. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:54, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Bay Windows

• Bay Windows · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Please userfy this page so that I can determine whether it may be improved sufficiently to be reinstated, thanks. -AV3000 (talk) 14:04, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:AV3000/Bay Windows. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 18:39, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Category:English Roman Catholic Religious Sisters

• Category:English Roman Catholic Religious Sisters · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This was deleted after some discussion, but it followed a discussion which focused only on the English, of which so far there was only one entry. The categorization of that article is now incorrect, and was based on "general knowledge". Would any other field accept such reasoning? Additionally, there are other national categorizations of Religious Sisters by nationality. Are the English to be the gap in this representation? Daniel the Monk (talk) 15:30, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

 Note: The existence or absence of Article X CAN NOT justify Article Y. Also, note that REFUND will not override the consensus of a deletion discussion; you need to go to WP:Deletion review instead. —Jeremy v^_^v ^{Components:V S M} 20:23, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Scenario testing

• Scenario testing · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

CopyVio is backward. As an editor of the page over several revisions I can guarantee that http://www.testinginterviewquestions.com/interview/10052/ copied the page and not the other way around. Look at the edit history. The external website added it 7/31/2006. -Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:34, 13 November 2011 (UTC

Done You're right about the time stamps but the tag also mentioned "Software Testing: Principles and Practice" page 118. Restored so any doubts can be sorted out.--Tikiwont (talk) 21:00, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

File:index.jpeg

• File:Index.jpeg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -Mjh1998 (talk) 19:37, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v ^{Components:V S M} 20:18, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Not done Has still no licensing info and is now redundant to File:Wokinghighschool.jpg on Commons with OTRS pending, so deleted. --Tikiwont (talk) 21:01, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Maria, Hapsbourg (1965- )

• Maria, Hapsbourg (1965- ) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Please undelete this article, and/or send me a copy for my notes. This is a bio of a private person who is a descendant of the Louis line of France and the Hapsbourg, and the title falls to her. If nothing else, I would like a copy of the posting; I didn't print it out. I will deal with this somewhere else. Thanks -24.67.147.67 (talk) 23:01, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Note: Surely you jest! No page's ever existed under that title (or any reasonable permutation of it) in any reasonable namespace! Are you sure that the page's title, capitalisation and all, is correct? —Jeremy v^_^v ^{Components:V S M} 03:50, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

It was Maria, Hapsbourg (1965- ), deleted as result of AFD. Peter E. James (talk) 03:56, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Nope, still not quite; the deleted article includes the title. In any case, Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —Jeremy v^_^v ^{Components:V S M} 04:07, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Pat Pedraza

• Pat Pedraza · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Please undelete as the information is all still current and active -76.95.117.89 (talk) 02:07, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

 Note: Article was deleted via stickyprod. You need to provide sources before an undeletion request will be entertained. —Jeremy v^_^v ^{Components:V S M} 03:50, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Category:Articles using divbox template

• Category:Articles using divbox template · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Deleted because it was empty (C1 speedy), however it is populated by Template:Divbox when there is misuse of the template to assist in cleanup. From the template documentation: "This template will automatically add inappropriate uses to category:articles using divbox template for cleanup." I'm guessing there's probably a template or category for such categories as this one that was not applied to protect it form mistaken deletion (It's been a while since I've been really active). I came across this, figured it was a mistake, so here is the undeletion request. Cheers. -Ned Scott 05:43, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Melanie Fontana (2nd)

• Melanie Fontana · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -70.188.174.198 (talk) 17:12, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

We don't know of ANY conflicts of interest in the Wiki posted biography of Melanie Fontana We are turning this over to others to take care of for her. PLEASE repost or send on to us a screen shot of the page so we can review what you are referring to.

thank you.

Janis Fontana manager 70.188.174.198 (talk) 17:12, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. Also, I can identify the conflict of interest: You're her manager, and thus you have a stake in whether or not she does well. —Jeremy v^_^v ^{Components:V S M} 17:53, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Meet The Browns (TV Series)

• File:Tpmeetthebrowns.jpg · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I've gotten permission from the company tbs to use the image but the image uploading page was to complicated and i didn't know where to click when you have permission to use an image. -Shadd21 (talk) 22:46, 14 November 2011 (UTC)