User talk:CambridgeBayWeather

move request

Hi. Cleaning up the backlog at RfM, and closed Ellalan (monarch) as 'moved'. However, couldn't actually move it due to the protection. Could you either move or unprotect, perhaps temporarily? It was a malformed request, and the discussion was based on nationalism and never addressed WP policy. Per COMMONNAME, however, the name should clearly be Elara: there are many refs to a Tamil king "Elara" in the English lit, but relatively few for a king "Ellalan". — kwami (talk) 20:41, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

You closed the RfM against consensus, cited "nationalism" to me as the reason people voted for Ellalan, and then moved the page to Elara against that consensus. @CambridgeBayWeather: Since this page has come up on your talk page twice now (once by me, once by Kwamikagami), I wonder if you might weigh in on this move decision because I'm... let's say I'm surprised at the outcome. Ogress _smash! 05:29, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

I'm not sure I have an opinion one way or another. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 05:41, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

@CambridgeBayWeather: Sooooo I'm not sure really where to go with this then. I don't know if this is an unusual situation; I haven't seen this kind of close but I don't have a lot of experience closing and you don't have an opinion. Do you have an opinion perhaps on what I should do when I have questions about a close? I'm not looking to knife-fight kwamikagami, I just want to discuss the issue and Kwami's reply today was "I think it would be best to ask an admin who is familiar with election articles to review my close." I had thought perhaps you might be that person, but maybe you can point me? Ogress _smash! 06:25, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Ogress, that reply was about an article on Malaysian election results. Nothing to do with this here.

I also asked for your input before I moved the article. You couldn't remember why you said what you did.

Consensus isn't a vote. Since little of the input was relevant to our naming conventions (he was Tamil, so we should use the Tamil name, etc.), I went with COMMONNAME: By my count, the Sinhalese version of his name outnumbers the Tamil version 15-to-1 in recent English sources. Now, maybe I'm wrong, which is why I asked you to explain the results you say you got, results which I couldn't repeat. And which is why I left instructions on the talk page that if people wish to reopen the discussion, they should use arguments based on WP guidelines. — kwami (talk) 06:33, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

(ec) @Ogress: If you want to contest the move then Wikipedia:Move review is the place. By the way the comment about election articles was to Number 57 in the section below yours on his talk page. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 06:35, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

I did not say I couldn't remember why I said what I did, I said I couldn't remember the search parameters I used. But whatever. Ogress _smash! 07:34, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Shahjalal International Airport

Can you semi-protect this article? The Bangladesh Airport Vandal has struck again on this article. Thanks! 97.85.113.113 (talk) 04:04, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Summerslam (2015)

Why do you protect the page to 25/8/2015! if you want to protect it protect it for three, four days but not to 25/8 and thanks. Mostafa Elsherbini (talk) 21:42, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Because people were warring over it. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:41, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Please remove the protection from the page because there is matches are annouces and a new theme song. CambridgeBayWeather. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mostafa Elsherbini (talk • contribs) 20:52, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

Summerslam 2015

Please remove the protection on Summerslam 2015 page because we want to add the new matches and new theme song . So please remove this protection . and Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohamed Eldakak (talk • contribs) 21:12, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

SS

Fully protecting Summerslam 2015 is not a good move. Just ban the warring users instead (but that's my opinion and input not an order). It's not like we're talking about the Super Bowl or World Cup. I hardly think that having Summerslam 2015 being semi until Aug 26 is going to make the earth implode . RbAxM33320 (talk) 04:39, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Summerslam (2015)

Can you please lift or shorten the restricted editing on Summerslam (2015) as it can not be updated for new matches or when the event is happening on August 23rd. Thank you for your time. I Am Awesome 061796 (talk) 00:31, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

SPFL Stadiums Template

Link to article

This template is excellent in terms of quickly updating multiple pages, but I have noticed that certain capacities on the SPFL website do not match up with those on official club websites. For example, the capacity for Kilmarnock FC is 17,921 on the SPFL website and 18,128 on the club's own website. My instinct would be that the the clubs are more likely to have accurate information than the league, but I appreciate that using the same source for all clubs does ensure consistency. Would it be sensible to use club websites where possible?

Craig1989 (talk) 00:32, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

It sounds like a good idea. I had also noticed that there were differences between them. I wasn't sure which would be better but it is likely that the club is going to update sooner than the SPFL. I'm without Internet access except for the phone so if you want to do it then go for it. The references in the articles will need updating as well. CambridgeBayWeather (mobile) (talk) 02:13, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

SummerSlam

Is there any chance I can make some edits to the page SummerSlam 2015 as I have found out some new matches through watching Monday Night Raw tonight

Yours

Gareth Roberts — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.149.251.16 (talk) 03:23, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

SummerSlam 2015 article

The SummerSlam 2015 article needs some serious updating. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyhh2002 (talk • contribs) 04:26, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

ASAP

Could I draw your immediate attention to this? The article is receiving insane amounts of traffic for a news less than barely an hour old. We need protection. Mar4d (talk) 19:36, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Should be there in a few minutes. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:06, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, but semi-protection will suffice. Full protection is overkill. He died recently, therefore constructive edits should still be welcomed. I was intending to reformat the article and add some sources. Could you do the needful? Mar4d (talk) 20:47, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Not sure which are and which are not constructive though. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:53, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

We'll take care of that. It's the unregistered IPs which were creating (and tend to create) issues. The article still needs to be open for editing for confirmed users, as new information comes in. Mar4d (talk) 21:02, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Reduced to semi. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:15, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Your block of Firefox lani

I don't think we are getting through to this editor.

"I have been blocked for 24 hours.It's nothing but just a small time, tomorrow I will edit again..But I'm not going to vandalize anymore, but if I edit something based on sources, do not dare to threat me again.I'm tired of your warnings, every time even if I contribute on something, you will warn me again and again.Let this not happen again". --Kansas Bear (talk) 23:17, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

I guess we'll just have to wait and see. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:32, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Deception Bay

Hello CambridgeBayWeather. Some advice please. I made a redirect Deception Bay, Quebec to Salluit and then realized they're not quite the same place, 53.5 km apart. Should I leave it like that or put a delete tag on it? I've seen you around here for a while now - Nunavut hey? SlightSmile 00:52, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. That's my first time learning about using an anchor - feeling like a newbie. SlightSmile 01:19, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

eway

Hi! You reverted changes i made to the eWAY page. What was the problem with my edits? I was adding new information (Gfennell (talk) 05:12, 20 August 2015 (UTC))

Hi, I am a member of Omega Kappa Mu Multicultural fraternity Inc. We've recently created a Wikipedia page consisting information of our fraternity and it was recently deleted because of "non importance". We used the username: OmegaKappaMu , and then OmegaKappaMuMulticutural. I would like to know is their anything we can do to have our page view to the public. Please get back to me ASAP.OmegaKappaMuMulticultural (talk) 03:22, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Problem with Braun Stowman wiki page?

Hi, is there a problem with Braun Stowman's wiki page as everytime I go onto it I get this... TRIIIIIIIIIPLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.192.130.85 (talk) 01:40, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Refresh your browsers cache. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 01:46, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Edit conflict

I had thought that the meaning of "edit conflict" was obvious, at least from experience, if from nothing else. An edit conflict is what happens whenever 2 people try to edit a page simultaneously. After one person saves his edit, the other can not. When he tries to save, he will get an "edit conflict" message. Theoretically, one can resolve an edit conflict if he is some kind of computer scientist or specialist. I have never been able to do that. Also, it should be obvious that editing a page that has a construction tag is likely to produce an edit conflict. 76.93.209.228 (talk) 06:46, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mertensia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bluebell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Block of Faizan. Thank you. Hasteur (talk) 17:05, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Template:WWE personnel

Just letting you know that I fully protected the template, because the edit warring continued after you semi'd it. --w^{L<speak·check>} 05:51, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Sounds good to me. 06:21, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Stallion

I noticed that you put this on PC yesterday. However, when the vandalism resumed today, I reviewed the page history and found that no substantial improvements had been made since at least March. I therefore saw no harm in elevating the protection to semiprot for two weeks and left your original PC provision intact, so it'll be on PC after the two weeks. Hope that works for you. Cheers, Samsara 10:30, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Sounds good to me. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:53, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Full protection and move of multiple pages.

I would like to ask you to move the following pages back to their original names and fully protect them for some period of time.A user has been moving them without consensus at the various talk pages.He translated the Spanish titles to English without seeking consensus.The reason I say this,the English titles change overtime and are usually just for the understanding of the Spanish title and other countries often change those English names.So therefore I would like you to consider my plea has I cannot move them as I may provoke a,move war.The pages are *The Color of Passion to El color de la pasión

• Wild at Heart (telenovela) to Corazón indomable or Corazón indomable (telenovela)
• The Stray Cat to La gata (2014 telenovela)
• The Neighbor (telenovela) to La vecina

The reported user moved page:Hasta el fin del mundo severally last year. Please take this to consideration as I have low experience in tagging requests that may bring major problems at the respective Talk Pages. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nyanchoka (talk • contribs) 06:51, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Nyanchoka I'm not sure that is a good idea. You should go to Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves and list them there. I'm not sure which is the correct title. Especially as "The Color of Passion" includes a image with that title. If you list them at requested moves then you, Philip J Fry and anyone else interested can discuss it. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 07:46, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

The problem is my browser,I've tried listing them their but they don't seem to align as they should be.Please list them for me.I'll appreciate it.User:Nyanchoka,nyanchy 10:35, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Nyanchoka they are listed at Talk:The Color of Passion#Requested move 4 September 2015 where you and Philip J Fry can discuss them properly. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:51, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

USER PAGE/RAYOLIVERESQ

First, I am reticent about communicating with anyone who fails to disclose their identity. You operate behind a false name. Kindly review my comments with John CD, regarding the improper deletion of my user page. My page reveals my name and pertinent information about me. This information is available for any administrator or editor or contributor to review and have the full benefit of knowing whom they are communicating with. It is self evident that my user page is NOT a blog. It is NOT self promotional. In fact, the User Page is not subject to any search within Wikipedia. It is not subject to a specific/key search on any search utility. Further note that the fact that I listed that my page "was under construction and may be moved for Article review," does not require that I submit my page for article review. I had decided that I will not submit my page for article review. Rather, the information is important to provide an understanding of my background. You are incorrect in your application of the "independent source" for reliability of content. I am NOT establishing myself as the authority for reliability or notability of an article's content. However, I am insistent that if I state that a SOURCE is a scholarly source in contrast to a propagandistic source for content, then the administrator/contributor who disagrees can review my background to determine whether there is a credibility and education in recognizing the conventional scholarly material, as opposed to footnotes and content which is based on propagandistic material.

I am bothered that you have deleted my page. Apparently, unlike you, it is a substantial contribution to Wikipedia for me to participate voluntarily. My time is valuable, expensive and limited. I am not in the habit of having to waste time, in wars with others who have interrupted my work and disrupted my ability to provide detailed information for the Wiki community, to provide the benefit of fully understanding the person they are communicating with.

This is not the case with you or with your page. I have no idea what your background is or what your name and demonstrated achievements might be.

I am restoring my page to the format and with the content that I choose. There is no Wiki policy/provision which prohibits the construction of my page in a manner that I deem fit. Again it is not a blog. It is NOT social media. (There are no persons having engaged in any form of communication with me, other than you and John CD.) My page is NOT a presentment of me "as a source of reliability" for content of an article. That is a misapplication of the provisions and is specious reasoning. My USER PAGE content is used to present a professional background for accurately determining whether a "source is a conventional scholarly source." My background is provided to establish credibility on my determination on whether content is "supported in academia" and "whether contrasting arguments or opinions serves the free dissemination of scholarly opinion." You should be able to recognize that distinction between "using oneself as an independent source of reliability" and "using oneself as experienced in identifying academic and scholarly sources."

I will restore my page with my personal information.

I do not want any further wasted valuable time addressing Wiki administrators who find it more pleasing to themselves to remain anonymous to the Wiki community. False screen names fell into disuse more than 20 years ago, when presenting oneself in the public internet venue.

Ray Oliver Ray Oliver, Esq. 02:43, 5 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RAYOLIVERESQ (talk • contribs)

RAYOLIVERESQ, if you looked at the messages on your talk page you would have seen a link to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:RAYOLIVERESQ. It was there that you could have expressed your opposition to the deletion. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 09:10, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Monuments Pakistan

Just double checking; you protected that because of vandalism/high visibility, right (judging by the history/original request)? Saqib (talk · contribs) has an {{editprotected}} and I didn't want to accidentally edit the page if you felt it was a content dispute or something. :P --slakr^\ talk / 10:05, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Slakr, yes it was because of vandalism. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:09, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you

...for protecting Xylocopa violacea. Any blocks you see fit to place on numerous accounts would be welcome. Cheers, JNW (talk) 11:28, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

I was just looking at them, 47 different editors with 127 edits. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:30, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

DWTS 21

Thank you for the protection! It was turning into a freaking mess. I had just placed a warning on the article's talk page and the users' talk pages since no warnings were given. Regardless, I thank you for your help. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 21:54, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Callmemirela, thanks for putting the warnings. I wanted to finish the protection page before looking to see who needed warning. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:01, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Looks like I beat to it ;P Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} ♑ 22:02, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

BAD. Full protection is a very big action. Having it for only 7 days is extremely weak. I suggest that you exercise better judgement by having full protection for two weeks. This is because if you make the big step of full protection, it shouldn't be so short. Please do this. Sandra opposed to terrorism (talk) 20:53, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Sandra opposed to terrorism, no it was good. A week is plenty. Usually by that time the parties concerned will have worked it out. If not then longer periods are available. Most admins tend to use shorter periods than that. So no I'm not going to change it. You probably should get a bit more experience first. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:10, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Inuite

I replied to you on my talk page. -- P.T. Aufrette (talk) 16:36, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Strawkipedia

I don't know why, but his talk page won't go away from the speedy list. I know you did something to the sandbox, which is now off the list, but the talk page is on. I've tried a null edit, which often works, but didn't here. Beyond me... Peridon (talk) 11:20, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Peridon, and beyond me I tried emptying the sandbox but no luck. I've posted at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 140#Tagged for deletion. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:01, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Interesting. I'd never have thought of that one. Peridon (talk) 16:02, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Indian Airport Vandal

Looks like Suvarnabhumi Airport could use a protection. Thanks! HkCaGu (talk) 18:46, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Page Lock on Male Rape

I'm not quite sure I understand this decision. One editor made six reversions of three separate editors in a 24 hour period. No one else was engaging in edit warring, as far as I can tell. Maybe I'm missing something, but it seems like a case where a temporary block, a warning, or no action would be more sensible than locking the article completely for a week. Isn't that usually reserved for more serious cases where there's rampant bad behavior? Nblund (talk) 21:49, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Nblund, your link didn't work this should. It looked to me as if at least three and possible four were beginning an edit war. It seemed best to lock the page rather than block one or more people. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:06, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Can I ask how, exactly? Mattnad added some material and changed the name of a section heading, and someone later made a removed a long-outdated tag. Telfordbuck made a single reversion. Flyer22 disputed Tsbarracks' changes on the talk page but made no content changes at all. I made two sets of edits to some well sourced content. I don't think I engaged in anything resembling an edit war, and I am totally sure that the other involved editors didn't.

Am I misunderstanding something about how "edit warring" is defined, or is it possible that you misread what was happening in the page history? Nblund (talk) 00:22, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

It looked to me as if people were arguing/reverting but I could have been wrong. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:26, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

United Nations statistical divisions

Hi CambridgeBayWeather, you recently deleted this as an expired WP:PROD, but I swear I contested the tag and removed it. Was it re-tagged after my removal? I don't think it should be deleted under WP:PROD since the policy specifically says "it cannot be used with redirects". Also, per WP:R#KEEP the redirect is still used in article space, so deleting it breaks some links, and it's useful for pointing searches to the correct article. Can you please restore it? TDL (talk) 12:18, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Danlaycock, the pages were moved then the redirect prodded. I've restored all the redirects. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:25, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks CambridgeBayWeather! I see where I got confused now. I contested this one but missed the rest. Thanks again. TDL (talk) 23:01, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Princess Johanna of Hesse and by Rhine

Hi. You made the right choice I'm sorry i got heated. I just don't think Johanna should be called Princess, just because the Hessian Grand Ducal family didn't accept that a bunch of smelly peasants could abolish their titles, just because they happened to be the government. Paul Austin (talk) 14:51, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (Dear Sir,

We are working on this Wikipedia page for an historic Olympic organization founded by the late great Al Oerter, Olympic icon, with several dozen notable high profile Olympic athletes, including world record holders, Olympic champions and numerous Olympic medalists, most of which can be verified on Wikipedia. This organization has been in existence for 9 years, including a physical museum/gallery located in Fort Myers Fl for almost four years. Most of the activities and files have been hidden, tucked away or lost. We are in the process of tracking down all or at least most of the past activities and creating our virtual presence, under the leadership of Cathy Oerter, Chairwoman of AOTO and widow of the late Al Oerter. We will / are linking to videos, articles, press coverage and other documentation to validate the organization and all of its accomplishments as you - Wikipedia - require. We've started with an Instagram account and last week we created the "Art of The Olympian" YouTube channel that now has a dozen videos including a 30 minute documentary video narrated by 1968 figure skating champion and AOTO artist Peggy Fleming. As well we will be improving our existing website.

The "Art of the Olympians" were given permission to use the USOC Olympic Rings and the word "Olympian", an act protected by congress. We are in the process of becoming an official IOC (International Olympic Committee) recognized organization.

I am one of the founding members. My name is Roald Bradstock, 2 time GB Olympic javelin thrower, former world record holder and current masters world record holder for over 50. I am also nicknamed "The Olympic Picasso" by the media and am now in charge of the Art of the Olympians (AOTO) organization. It is essential that we have a Wikipedia page for this organization.

If you need any more questions please feel free to contact me. Thank you.

Kind regards

Roald Bradstock 770 882 7799) Yogurtboy (talk) 15:47, 8 September 2015 (UTC)Yogurtboy (talk) 16:49, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

A couple of very speedy deletions and a request for userification

Can you userify the two pages I made which you recently speedied under A7. No indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content, events). They are Robin Parisotto and Michael Ashenden. Many thanks (Msrasnw (talk) 19:25, 8 September 2015 (UTC))

Many thanks (Msrasnw (talk) 19:31, 8 September 2015 (UTC))

Baahubali

Hi CBW, I'm confused about the recent article move from "Production of Baahubali" to "Baahubali" and I fear it will cause further confusion. The main film article is Baahubali: The Beginning. I believe the follow-up is Baahubali: The Conclusion. The "Production of Baahubali" article was presumably created to get into the details of production. Another editor moved that article to "Baahubali (film series)" without discussion, which I opposed, because I felt it warranted discussion. I don't see how moving the article to plain-old "Baahubali" is going to prevent confusion, and I'm also unclear on why "Production of Baahubali" is insufficient. If the scope of the article is the production, that seems a reasonable title. If the problem is that the article contains information that is outside of the scope of that title, it makes more sense to retain the title and pare the content. Thoughts? Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:42, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Hmm. Actually, after looking at Kill Bill, I think I see your point. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:45, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

I found it in the Category:Candidates for speedy deletion page. It said it was an uncontroversial move. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:54, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Kamil Aliyev

Hi, CambridgeBayWeather. You have deleted this article. But several hours ago I worked on it. If there is still some copyvio issues could you restore it on my page? I will work on the text again. --Interfase (talk) 20:32, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Request for reduction in protection level

• Princess Johanna of Hesse and by Rhine (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Full protection for one week: I think a jump from no protection to indefinite full protection is a bit much. From the talk page conversation started yesterday, it looks as though the debate had already died down even before you protected it.Cebr1979 (talk) 21:42, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Cebr1979 if you think the problem is over then post to the talk page and show that others agree. Then make a request at WP:RFPP asking for unprotection. Point to this section to say I am fine with it if there is consensus. Sorry but this will be my last post for about 11 or 12 hours. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 22:02, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dr_Frank_Brennan

Hi

I am trying to publish a page about the late Dr Frank Brennan, I believe it was removed because "which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject"

I list a national paper piece in the Irish Independent newspaper

I had not noted this piece on the page but most of the references were included.

I look forward to your response.

~~Eamon M~~ eamurtagh@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eamon M (talk • contribs) 13:47, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Internal inconsistency in calculating years and days

Hello, CBW,

This is in regard to List of monarchs in Britain by length of reign.

Many persons both within and without Wikipedia have argued about the precise date on which Queen Elizabeth II will surpass Queen Victoria's reign. No problem there -- people disagree with each other all the time. But there appears to be an inconsistency within the article itself. The chart says Victoria reigned for 23,226 days and that she reigned for "63 years, 216 days". Right below that, the chart says that Elizabeth II also reigned for 23,226 days, but then says "63 years, 215 [not 216] days". How can they both have reigned for the same number of days, but not the same number of years and days?

Respectfully,

Captain Quirk (talk) 16:34, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

@Captain Quirk:. Leap years, specifically 1900 was not a leap year in the Gregorian calendar, but 2000 was. — Strongjam (talk) 17:12, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Captain Quirk. I can't answer that and I only protected the page because of people making several changes. The question is something that should be on Talk:List of monarchs in Britain by length of reign. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:37, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

ANI discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:50, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

the thread is Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Move_war_regarding_Baahubali -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:54, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Can You Restore Hit & Beats ?

I Was Adding Some Info On Hits & Beats Page & I Don't How I Removed Advertising Tag..Could You Please Revert It Back So That I Can Add Some More Info & Please Undo The Redirect Too.As I Am Rookie ..I Will Feel If You Help Me In Creating This Wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hits_%26_Beats

Regards, James Collin — Preceding unsigned comment added by 101.212.68.141 (talk) 23:19, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

I have restored it to User talk:Viccky2012\sandbox. You can work on it there and then see if it is OK for an article. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:37, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Prague Václav Havel Airport

Looks like this article needs to be semi-protected, the Indian Airport Vandal has struck this page too! Thanks! Citydude1017 (talk) 05:21, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Bobby Laurie

FYI, see Robert Laurie (TV artist) and Robert Laurie (TV Personality). Should we make Bobby Laurie a redirect to TAKE OFF! with The Savvy Stews, then admin-edit-protect it? Not sure you noticed the discussion at Talk:Bobby Laurie. Thanks, Wbm1058 (talk) 11:12, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Wbm1058, thanks for pointing that out. All three of those now redirect and are protected for 6 months. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:21, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

/r/MHOC and the Reddit Model World

Uh, hey, about the deletion of the Reddit Model World Article, wasn't the "over a thousand people" having been engaged with it enough to justify its page? I was just about to fix the formatting of the citation and add this one: http://redditmetrics.com/r/MHOC which goes further into the enagagement with /r/mhoc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WineRedPsy (talk • contribs) 12:16, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

WineRedPsy, you will need better sources than Reddit to say why that is notable. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 12:24, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

• But, it's on Reddit to start with.. It's a primary source that people go there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WineRedPsy (talk • contribs) 14:08, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

{{u|WineRedPsy]], that it is on Reddit is no indication that it is notable. You need things from others outside of Reddit. Look at Reddit#IAmA and AMA and see the sources it uses. That's much larger and it doesn't warrant its own article. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:13, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Reverts at TVB Noon News and TVB News at Ten

Hi, I have noticed that you have reverted the hoax speedy delete notices on the above pages. Please see for the TV program schedule for the alleged television channel: http://programme.tvb.com/pearl. There is no evidence showing that these news programs exist. The user created these pages has been blocked and has a history of creating hoax articles and images. Please reconsider speedy deleting the pages concerned, thanks. Wylve (talk) 14:12, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Wylve you could try restore the tag and see if you could get another opinion. I don't really want to take action when I'm not 100% sure. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:13, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Bangladesh Airport Vandal

Looks like Queen Alia International Airport has been struck by the Bangladesh Airport Vandal and a few other pages too. Citydude1017 (talk) 19:01, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Citydude1017. Thanks. Got it for 6 months. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:13, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

Barnstar!

		The Original Barnstar
		For your Wikipedia contributions, and for being so far up there keeping the true north strong and free ... while the rest of us are huddled around the border. New Media Theorist (talk) 01:30, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Krum Corporate edit

There is no evidence besides the article itself that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krum_Corporate is an established entity. All articles listed as citations fail to mention the company itself, and Google search for the company yields nothing except pages that have scraped the wikipedia page. The company is not listed as an investor by any of the companies referenced in the article. The article for the head of Krum Corporate, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Krum, is also clearly factitious. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.47.218.53 (talk) 20:45, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

One of the references does mention Krum Corporate, here, which to me means it can't be deleted out of hand. You could start an AfD for them both CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:33, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

The reference that mentions krum corporate is constructed by scraping Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.107.62.178 (talk) 18:02, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

I've started the AfD and you can comment there, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krum Corporate. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:57, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Heydar Aliyev International Airport

The Bangladesh Airport Vandal hit this page too! Thanks! Citydude1017 (talk) 14:49, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

District 4-5A (LHSAA)

So you felt the need to delete this article even after I added four sources and a talk page explanation of its significance. Did you read these or just blindly delete everything? Please put this content back and read. Check some sources, do some googling, do your own due diligence. If you are still not convinced, then restore to my user space. This is coming back. Trackinfo (talk) 00:12, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Trackinfo, I restored it but it still looks like trivia to me. None of the sources indicate why it is notable just that it exists. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:21, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

All of the sources are coverage of the play within the league. They all just discuss one week of one season of one sport. But that is its significance; to facilitate the play between those same teams across multiple sports over a sequence of seasons. As I admitted in the talk page, I don't know the highlights of its significance because I have no involvement with this league or this state. I'm unqualified to write the prose about a subject I know nothing about, but I can source the structure of the organization, as I have done. More knowledgeable editors will then be able to fill in the knowledge, if the article exists. The sources already give a clear indication that there IS as story there. If I were to write it from just these sources, I would produce the wrong story. Trackinfo (talk) 00:35, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Junjun

Yo. You deleted the Junjun article with the explanation "(A7: Article about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject)".

I'm a little confused. Junjun isn't an organized event, it's an upcoming documentary film by Paul Thomas Anderson. If you think the article didn't sufficiently indicate notability that's fair enough, but FWIW Anderson is a very notable director, and the documentary's subject Jonny Greenwood is a very notable musician. Once the film is released the film will certainly be notable enough to merit its own article, though maybe until then there aren't sufficient sources that can demonstrate the notability?

I don't have strong feelings on the matter, just wanted to make sure we were on the same page. Thanks. Popcornduff (talk) 06:24, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Popcornduff, without sources the article as yet does not meet notability. As you say it probably will after release. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 10:16, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of Davey Browne

Questioning deletion of Davey Browne. Article on its face met WP:NBOX and this fact was sourced from major and well-established sources, including ESPN. This meets the requirement of a credible claim of significance or importance. I see no reason why this was deleted in this manner. If you feed the person is not notable, then I suggest going through full deletion procedures.RonSigPi (talk) 00:03, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

RonSigPi, it's restored now. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 00:07, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

World's First Dedicated E-commerce to Mr. Amitabh Bachchan www.bigbshop.com

Hello,

Yesterday, I was created BigBshop page on wikipedia but you are delete this page.

So how can Live this page on wikipedia. this is a not a promotional page. it is an E-commerce in India. please check all infoemation on google, facebook & other site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigbshop (talk • contribs) 10:54, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

You need good sources and it needs to not be written as an advert. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:12, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

The Babys

I think this edit war could go on for some time with unlimited sockpuppetry, as far as I understand Michael Corby has not relinquished the use of the name. The present group believes they have acquired the legal right to use it. It is the music business after all, so it all seems to be very heated. The reverts by the New Babys seem very aggressive and threatening. One edit on 18th August seems to contain a threat. I'm not sure that they want to understand the concept of Wikipedia as an Encyclopedia rather than a promotional tool. Stedbeat (talk) 14:50, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

It doesn't seem too bad right now. I'll check back once in a while. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 15:34, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your interest in this fascinating group. The Babys Archives existed from 2006 until a few years ago. Mark Perkins a lithographer of Badfinger fame had outlined Corby's part in constructing the original group with the late Adrian Millar. It was removed from the internet around 2009 and is unlikely to return. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stedbeat (talk • contribs) 06:26, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Request DormCo

May I please ask why you deleted DormCo's Wikipedia page? It has been up for 3-4 years without incident. It was a long process to originally get approved as we had to rework the page for a month to meet the criteria requested of the admin and Wikipedia. I am not sure why someone wanted to harm us and request it be removed but it is upsetting as a small business owner to see it occur yet see countless other companies be permitted to stay active.

Please do let me know if I can adjust anything or even if your kindly reconsider.

Thanks Jeff Gawronski — Preceding [[Wikipedia:166.170.36.157 (talk) 22:05, 16 September 2015 (UTC)] comment added by 166.170.36.157 (talk) 22:01, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

In the format that it was in it didn't look very notable and also looked like an advert. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:44, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Advanced Center for Korean Studies

Our organization is non-profit research center concentrating on the thorough studies of Korean studies, we are also granted numerous historical materials by private sectors. I tried to acknowledge our organization to the academia so researchers who want to gather information concerning Korean studies could share our endeavors. Please undo your speedy deletion, I would be very much appreciated. Many thanks. Bo Seung Kang. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jabade (talk • contribs) 23:42, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Jabade, it looks like an advert and I see was also deleted by another admin. The best thing would be to work on it in your sandbox or see Wikipedia:Drafts. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:48, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

User talk:Chrispinelover32

Hi, I was going to leave a Welcoome message at User talk:Chrispinelover32 about test edits due to an apparent personal comment added to Revival (Selena Gomez album). However, it said that you had deleted his Talk page and that I should contact you. —Iknow23 (talk) 04:57, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Iknow23, the wording says "If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page" and I doubt that you were intending to make BLP violating remarks so it's not a problem. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:56, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Ok, I was "unsure" so thought I should ask. Thank You.—Iknow23 (talk) 18:15, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Jeremy Corbyn page protection

I feel that your actions in protecting the Jeremy Corbyn page were not justified - if someone is edit warring then block them. Expecting everyone now to have to act through admin edit requests for such a currently high profile page is getting pretty silly. In addition, the photo that has been left on the page is controversial. --ℕ ℱ 19:20, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

nonsenseferret if the person is acting to prevent a BLP problem then blocking them is a terrible idea. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:36, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Protecting the page and leaving it WITH the problem is even worse. --ℕ ℱ 19:37, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

I didn't> Please check things out first. This is the image being complained about, this is the image that replaced it and Jeremy Corbyn has a third image. Are you now claiming that is a BLP as well? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:02, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

I'm claiming the current image with the hat is a BLP issue yes. I'm not the first person on the article talkpage to have objected to it. --ℕ ℱ 20:06, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Then why not just say there is an edit request on the talk page? CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:17, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

The question of the ridiculous photo is resolved by my edit request. Thank you for resolving that. However, the problem I'm raising at your talkpage, the question of you having protected the page remains, and I still feel it is unjustified. --ℕ ℱ 20:20, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Taking a quick look at the page history, there is clearly a dispute going on at the moment. Given that, a short term page protection is not clearly unreasonable. I would suggest helping to resolve the issue on the talk page, rather than arguing for the protection to be lifted without the issue having been resolved. -- KTC (talk) 02:43, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

As the protection has now been swiftly removed, it seems that I was certainly not alone in thinking this extreme measure was unjustified. --ℕ ℱ 12:19, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

@CambridgeBayWeather: I have tagged the page with {{pp-dispute}} to make it clear to readers and any potential editors that the page is fully protected at the wrong version. -- KTC (talk) 02:43, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

I've now removed the protection from the page. You were right to full-protect to stop the edit warring, but the time period was vastly too long and was preventing other constructive editing, and in particular allowed a BLP violation far more serious than any photo issue -- the use of the word "prevaricated" -- to persist in the article longer than it otherwise would have. I've commented on the article talk page giving my reasons: in particular, please note that I've now recused myself from the image issue for at least the next month to avoid conflict of interest. -- The Anome (talk) 12:39, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

• An unfortunate consequence of removing protection is that NickCT (the editor who reported me for edit-warring) has now violated 3RR himself, with this edit; the history shows three previous reverts and so a total of 4 in less than 24 hours. Not a great situation... Nomoskedasticity (talk) 14:05, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Then please follow the normal processes for edit-warring, and let admins deal with them (or indeed both of you) in the normal way, instead of forum-shopping to individual admins' talk pages. -- The Anome (talk) 14:13, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

I would not block NickCT either. In cases of edit warring I prefer not to block, if possible, as blocked editors can't take part in discussions to solve the problems. As for the length of protection it was done to try and ensure discussion. If it is for a few hours then people will sometimes wait and restart after protection expires. If a resolution is formed then the protection can be removed before the time is up. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 14:29, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Page deletion error

I am writing to ask if you can restore the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MGMT90018_2015S2_highperformanceworksystems/sandbox. The reason given was that it was (U5: Blatant misuse of Wikipedia as a web host). I can see how it might have appeared that way, but in fact it is just a sandbox that a group students in my class (I am a professor in Australia) are using to edit the page before it goes live. There is no other purpose for the page than to edit a Wikipedia page to the point that it is of sufficient quality that they can begin moving the content to a live Wikipedia article by the same name (once it has been submitted for review). Thus, I do not believe it is being used as a web host. My apologies for any confusion Abarsky123 (talk) 01:39, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Swaleh Nguru

I see that Swaleh Nguru has been deleted. He is an influencial figure that needs his own page. he is a much appreciated figure in the Kenyan Spotlight due to his conservation efforts, refugee protection and philanthropy and immense wealth. it is sad to see his page taken down. Perhaps the page should be recreated and exapanded on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.141.1.90 (talk) 20:36, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Then it should be easy to find sources to back that up. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:39, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Yes, there is plenty. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.141.1.90 (talk) 20:43, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Then go for it. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:45, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

This is the error received. "This page is protected from creation, so only administrators can create it." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.141.1.90 (talk) 20:47, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

You need to create an account and then create the page using Wikipedia:Drafts. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:54, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Please unblock the Topic so it doesn't have to be created by admins only. Thanks. I really appreciate it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.141.1.90 (talk) 20:59, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

It needs to be worked on first then created. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:07, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

Bajótz

Hi CBW, note, that term is not a valid redirect for Bajót. This is a known sock who takes existing articles and makes copies of them in articles with a theme on "Bajótz". Using a closely named article like this is right in his M.O. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Yalexandrov/Archive. Thanks! Crow^Caw 19:03, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

OK. Thanks. I've deleted it now. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 19:49, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Please note this

I think you need to be aware of this: [1] I am aware of the block and unblock. Montanabw^(talk) 20:47, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

I really wish you had not unblocked. The user is clearly gaming edit warring, harassment, and personal attacks. He made five reverts to an article Montanabw edits during her RFA, reverting three different editors in the process. When he was asked to stop, he continued to revert and harass Montanabw on her talk page. Then, he withdraws from the discussion as he's hauled to the edit warring noticeboard. He's then blocked, and games the unblock, returning right back to the same dispute he said he would withdraw from. Viriditas (talk) 20:53, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Now he's back to reverting and making personal attacks.[2]. I think it's clear we need to prevent him from continuing this disruption by restoring the block. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 20:56, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

I have a right to respond to Montana truthfully, when she cast aspersion by making a bad-faith accusation. IHTS (talk) 21:01, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

p.s. Is the WP so wild & loose that it is OK for Viriditas to accuse with defamatory "serial harasser" in editsum and get away with?? [3] (How more hypocritical could that be?) IHTS (talk) 21:25, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

The thread at my talk page ( current ) speaks for itself. IHTS did revert the article 4 times in 3 hours after his initial edit and did not take the discussion to talk, another person had to open the discussion. Montanabw^(talk) 21:13, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Right now all three of you would be best served by leaving each other alone. I'm not going to block Ihardlythinkso again. While they probably shouldn't have posted at Montanabw I don't think it rises to the level of needing a block. Viriditas adding just to ensure you see this. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:29, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

OK. Is it appropriate to ask that you watchlist my talk page for a bit? I would also ask that you watchlist Talk:California Chrome, though IHTS has said he is done discussing things there. There are other eyes on that page and some useful discussion. Montanabw^(talk) 21:33, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

I can only watch them for about 30 minutes and them I'm off work and it's home to see my favourite girl (my five year old granddaughter). CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 21:37, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

RFP

Thank you both for looking. — Ched :  ?  22:05, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

What the?

Why you keep removing my pages? emideuyjin ssibalnomma. Niebihongeo — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.223.16.199 (talk) 11:17, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Log in and then tell me what pages. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 11:28, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Onoff App Wikipedia page deletion

Hi CambridgeBayWeather,

About 30 minutes ago you deleted the Onoff App Wikipedia page. We feel that this page satisfied all Wikipedia requirements and, as such, its existence on Wikipedia was justified.

Please can you tell us what more we need to do to make this page Wikipedia-worthy? Did we need more sources?

We look forward to hearing from you.

Best wishes,

The onoff App team