Jump to content

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
re
Line 399: Line 399:
***[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Richard_Wagner&diff=842775025&oldid=842755446], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Richard_Wagner&diff=842776342&oldid=842775837], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Richard_Wagner&diff=842776857&oldid=842776510] [[User:Mr KEBAB|Mr KEBAB]] ([[User talk:Mr KEBAB|talk]]) 16:23, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
***[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Richard_Wagner&diff=842775025&oldid=842755446], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Richard_Wagner&diff=842776342&oldid=842775837], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Richard_Wagner&diff=842776857&oldid=842776510] [[User:Mr KEBAB|Mr KEBAB]] ([[User talk:Mr KEBAB|talk]]) 16:23, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
****The first diff is not me; the second and third diffs prove your claim is false. [[User:Softlavender|Softlavender]] ([[User talk:Softlavender|talk]]) 16:28, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
****The first diff is not me; the second and third diffs prove your claim is false. [[User:Softlavender|Softlavender]] ([[User talk:Softlavender|talk]]) 16:28, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
*****Fair enough, but that doesn't change much. It still mean you didn't read my edit summaries. [[User:Mr KEBAB|Mr KEBAB]] ([[User talk:Mr KEBAB|talk]]) 16:30, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
*****Fair enough, but that doesn't change much. It still means you didn't read my edit summaries. [[User:Mr KEBAB|Mr KEBAB]] ([[User talk:Mr KEBAB|talk]]) 16:30, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:30, 24 May 2018

    Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard

    This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

    You must notify any user you have reported.

    You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.


    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    Additional notes
    • When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
    • The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
    • Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
    • Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.

    Definition of edit warring
    Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.
    Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)
    An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.

    Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.


    User:Wikiblazers reported by User:Jim1138 (Result: Warned)

    Page
    Wong Jeh Shyan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported
    Wikiblazers (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
    Previous version reverted to
    Diffs of the user's reverts
    1. 07:43, 21 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842253127 by Jim1138 (talk) I had added back. But the source shows that HE ORGANIZES, not owns."
    2. 07:35, 21 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842252796 by Jim1138 (talk) Please check. Even if there are links, 99% never referenced the content as it is. Most of the links only mention about the projects or other things but no reference to Wong."
    3. Multiple edits 2018-05-21T07:25
    4. Multiple edits 2018-05-21T07:14
    5. Multiple edits 2018-05-21T06:48
    6. Multiple edits 2018-05-21T08:16
    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
    1. 07:33, 21 May 2018 (UTC) "Wong Jeh Shyan"
    2. 07:36, 21 May 2018 (UTC) "EW notice"
    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
    1. 07:44, 21 May 2018 (UTC) "Sources examples"
    Comments:

    Wikiblazers is an wp:SPA who is removing content claiming that content with dead links is unsourced. I have informed Wikiblazers about wp:KDL. Wikiblazers continues to remove such content. Jim1138 (talk) 08:25, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Now, I am a part of the scam diff Jim1138 (talk) 08:27, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    I had pointed out about the notability of this Wong Jeh Shyan in concern. FIrstly, his PhD is a fake degree banned by Pakistan. See this link https://dailytimes.com.pk/159160/hec-bans-two-universities-karachi/ But it was ignored by Jim1138

    Then I pointed out over 5 other problems with the article but it was undo by Jim1138. Look at the Talk under https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wong_Jeh_Shyan

    I am merely pointing out all the flaws. Please wiki editors, help me to see and verify every single thing in Wong Jeh SHyan. The sources are misrepresented and 99% made no reference to the things being said in the Wikipedia article. They merely point out facts and made no reference to WongWikiblazers (talk) 08:32, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Furthermore in my defense, i would like to point out that the deadlinks NEVER mention about Wong as well. if you have a log of the old dead links, you can see the comments are all "Needs References to Reliable Sources" or "Too vague". If you ever bothered to check these sources, you find that the facts are there, but Wong is never involved in whatever said in the articles.Wikiblazers (talk) 08:36, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    User:93.139.89.201 reported by User:ZH8000 (Result: No violation)

    Page
    Vignette (road tax) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported
    93.139.89.201 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
    Previous version reverted to
    Diffs of the user's reverts
    1. 01:40, 22 May 2018 (UTC) "I hope that's verifiable enough"
    2. 21:11, 21 May 2018 (UTC) "read: TRANSITING passenger car drivers. Nobody buys a yearly vignette when you only need to cross the country once or twice. Only in Switzerland are you forced to do so"
    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
    1. 23:58, 21 May 2018 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Vignette (road tax)‎. (TW)"
    2. 00:00, 22 May 2018 (UTC) "Added {{Static IP}} template. (TW)"
    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
    1. 02:36, 22 May 2018 (UTC) "/* POV */ new section"
    2. 02:36, 22 May 2018 (UTC) "/* POV */"
    Comments:
    Apologies for not seeing the message on the Vignette talk page. Posting it more than 3 minutes before reporting me would've helped. Regarding the sentence in dispute, I do think it's plain and obvious that the source verifies the claim. What POV can there be in the fact that Switzerland is the only country that has only yearly vignettes for cars is beyond me.
    I've edited WP for a long time and I don't appreciate being driven off by reverting and templating for two days before anyone cares to start a discussion with a filthy IP. I would encourage User:ZH8000 to edit as an IP on his/her own for a little bit and try to add a few sourced but "unpatriotic" claims of his/her own. Then he/she might understand why I don't edit much. 93.139.89.201 (talk) 03:16, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Vaalpak reported by User:Kirbanzo (Result: Semi)

    Page
    Joseph diGenova (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported
    Vaalpak (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
    Previous version reverted to
    Diffs of the user's reverts
    1. 20:25, 22 May 2018 (UTC) "the sources do not identify this as something he is prominent for"
    2. 20:19, 22 May 2018 (UTC) "did not remove any content from article"
    3. 20:17, 22 May 2018 (UTC) "moved text from lead - controversial sentence like this should not be the second sentence in the article. also only 2 or 3 news outlets label digenova this way"
    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
    1. 20:19, 22 May 2018 (UTC) "Caution: Removal of content, blanking on Joseph diGenova. (TW)"
    2. 20:21, 22 May 2018 (UTC) "Warning: Vandalism on Joseph diGenova. (TW)"
    3. 20:25, 22 May 2018 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Peter Strzok. (TW)"
    4. 20:26, 22 May 2018 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Joseph diGenova. (TW)"
    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


    Comments:
    • Result: Page semiprotected two months. This is intended to discourage drive-by editing by new editors who aren't willing to discuss their changes on Talk. I've also left a notice on the talk page that the subject matter falls under WP:ARBAP2. I am not applying a page restriction such as 1RR. Normal editing can continue, but only by autoconfirmed editors. This keeps the option of WP:ECP available for the future if the semiprotection doesn't improve the editing climate. The SPI report on Vaalpak was closed with no action. EdJohnston (talk) 17:26, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    User:ScepticismOfPopularisation reported by User:Drmies (Result: 24 hours)

    Page: Origins of Christianity (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: ScepticismOfPopularisation (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. [2]
    2. [3]
    3. [4]
    4. [5]
    5. [6]

    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [7]

    Attempt to resolve dispute on user talk page: User_talk:ScepticismOfPopularisation#May_2018

    Comments:
    User is determined to remove a word, though there is no doubt that "the syncretistic Hellenistic world" describes a fact that even the user doesn't disagree with; they are somehow scared that the reader will think that that makes Christianity syncretistic. Whether it is or isn't isn't the issue here. Drmies (talk) 03:47, 23 May 2018 (UTC)}}[reply]

    Joshua Jonathan's edit was the same as yours, and your other edit was reverted by Joshua Jonathan himself. I reverted your other edit PER Joshua Jonathan. "without explanation" is also severely dishonest.ScepticismOfPopularisation (talk) 03:58, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    User:AldezD reported by User:Tigranis (Result: Protected)

    Page: Pointless (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: AldezD (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to: [8]

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. [9]
    2. [10]
    3. [11]
    4. [12]
    5. [13]
    6. [14]

    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [15]

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [16]

    Comments:

    • User:AldezD has repeatedly reverted the page when at least 3 editors have disagreed with him but began a discussion when challenged to do so in an edit summary. He was warned at the outset that he had reverted too many times already (on 21st May) but then reverted 3 times in the space of 24 hours 21-22 May.--Tigranis (talk) 04:34, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      • The first three edits linked above are from 6, 10 and 12 days ago. The other three edits on 21 May do not fail WP:3RR since there wasn't a fourth revert. My edits on 21 May reverted re-addition of unsourced content that fails WP:V and falls under WP:NOTTVGUIDE. After reverting yesterday I initiated a discussion on the talk page linking to guidelines that explain why this content is not appropriate. Even when presented with guidelines, comments from editors including @User:Tigranis are simply "I don't agree" rather than addressing those guidelines, or repeatedly asking "what are the guidelines" even when they are linked within the discussion. I then asked for WP:3O, with the responder agreeing with me that this content does not belong on Wikipedia. AldezD (talk) 12:19, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Page protected – 3 days by User:Fish and Karate per a request at WP:RFPP. EdJohnston (talk) 03:23, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    User:TDN92 reported by User:Mztourist (Result: )

    Page: Viet Cong attack on Tan Son Nhut Air Base (1966) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: TDN92 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. [17]
    2. [18]
    3. [19]
    4. [20]
    5. [21]
    6. [22]
    7. [23]
    8. [24]
    9. [25]
    10. [26]

    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [27]

    Comments:

    User:TDN:92 and IP:117.6.92.136 (possibly an IP sock) have been edit-warring the results of this and various other First Indochina War and Vietnam War battles. I referred this to discussion of the Talk page which has been fruitless. Mztourist (talk) 05:01, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    Page: List of grenade attacks in Sweden (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: 2001:8003:4023:d900:45a4:c69c:3094:f649 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to: [28]

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. [29]
    2. [30]
    3. [31]
    4. [32]
    5. [33]

    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [34]

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [35][36][37]

    Comments:

    User:Bbt400 reported by 109.144.211.250 (Result: Semi)

    User being reported: Bbt400 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
    Page: Template:2018–19 EFL League One table (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User:Bbt400 Edit warring on 2018-19 EFL League One. 109.144.211.250 (talk) 15:06, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:2018%E2%80%9319_EFL_League_One_table&diff=prev&oldid=842613005

    https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:2018%E2%80%9319_EFL_League_One_table&diff=prev&oldid=842613000

    https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:2018%E2%80%9319_EFL_League_One_table&diff=prev&oldid=842612929

    https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:2018%E2%80%9319_EFL_League_One_table&diff=prev&oldid=842612863 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.144.211.250 (talk) 15:14, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    User:62.7.176.20 reported by User:BangJan1999 (Result:Blocked 72 hours )

    Page
    Template:2018–19 EFL League One table (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported
    62.7.176.20 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
    Previous version reverted to
    Diffs of the user's reverts
    1. 15:28, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842615510 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    2. 15:27, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842615441 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    3. 15:27, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842615385 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    4. 15:27, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842615360 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    5. 15:27, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842615317 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    6. 15:26, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842615266 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    7. 15:26, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842615239 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    8. 15:26, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842615183 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    9. 15:25, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842615144 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    10. Consecutive edits made from 15:23, 23 May 2018 (UTC) to 15:23, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
      1. 15:23, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842614280 by Bbt400 (talk)"
      2. 15:23, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842614365 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    11. 15:10, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842613005 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    12. 15:10, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842612978 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    13. 15:10, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842612929 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    14. 15:09, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842612863 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    15. Consecutive edits made from 15:08, 23 May 2018 (UTC) to 15:09, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
      1. 15:08, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842612759 by Bbt400 (talk)"
      2. 15:09, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842612789 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    16. Consecutive edits made from 15:08, 23 May 2018 (UTC) to 15:08, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
      1. 15:08, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842612691 by Bbt400 (talk)"
      2. 15:08, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842612712 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    17. Consecutive edits made from 15:07, 23 May 2018 (UTC) to 15:07, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
      1. 15:07, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842612324 by Bbt400 (talk)"
      2. 15:07, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842612377 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    18. 15:03, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842612116 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    19. 15:03, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842612065 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    20. 15:02, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842611990 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    21. 15:02, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842611945 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    22. 15:02, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842611923 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    23. 15:02, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842611893 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    24. 15:01, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842611840 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    25. 15:01, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842611800 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    26. 15:01, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842611734 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    27. 15:00, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842611702 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    28. 15:00, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842611669 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    29. 15:00, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842611637 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    30. 15:00, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842611597 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    31. 14:59, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842611540 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    32. 14:59, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842611518 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    33. 14:58, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842611446 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    34. 14:58, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842611413 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    35. 14:58, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842611378 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    36. 14:58, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842611341 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    37. 14:57, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842611298 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    38. Consecutive edits made from 14:57, 23 May 2018 (UTC) to 14:57, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
      1. 14:57, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842611180 by Bbt400 (talk)"
      2. 14:57, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842611206 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    39. Consecutive edits made from 14:56, 23 May 2018 (UTC) to 14:56, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
      1. 14:56, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842611108 by Bbt400 (talk)"
      2. 14:56, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842611133 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    40. 14:56, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842611051 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    41. 14:55, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842611009 by Bbt400 (talk)"
    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning


    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


    Comments:
      • Blocked – for a period of 72 hours. User is clearly on a rampage and is rapidly reverting several users across a wide swath of Wikipedia without cause or explanation. --Jayron32 15:52, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    User:86.153.135.111 reported by User:ZH8000 (Result: Semi)

    Page
    Vignette (road tax) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported
    86.153.135.111 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
    Previous version reverted to
    Diffs of the user's reverts
    1. Consecutive edits made from 16:43, 23 May 2018 (UTC) to 17:19, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
      1. 16:43, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* Switzerland */"
      2. 17:19, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* Switzerland */ Restore valid and correct sentence entirely supported by the alternate reference, but CE for passive voice and explain why."
    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
    1. 12:25, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Welcome to Wikipedia! (TW)"
    2. 17:06, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Schaffhausen. (TW)"
    3. 17:07, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* May 2018 */"
    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
    1. 02:36, 22 May 2018 (UTC) "/* POV */ new section"
    2. 02:36, 22 May 2018 (UTC) "/* POV */"
    3. 02:40, 22 May 2018 (UTC) "/* POV */"
    4. 13:28, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* OR */ Unbelievable"
    5. 13:32, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* OR */"
    6. 16:51, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* OR */ LOL"
    7. 16:52, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* OR */"
    Comments:

    There is an ongoing discussion taking place. And there is no justification to re-add the disputed text. ZH8000 (talk) 18:17, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    User:78.0.246.100 reported by User:ZH8000 (Result: Semi)

    Page
    Vignette (road tax) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported
    78.0.246.100 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
    Previous version reverted to
    Diffs of the user's reverts
    1. 00:18, 24 May 2018 (UTC) "I've restored the text along with the price hike footnote, and a bit more strained but unambiguous explanation, as ZH8000 continues to refuse to provide any reason for why he/she thinks this is OR"
    2. Consecutive edits made from 16:43, 23 May 2018 (UTC) to 17:19, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
      1. 16:43, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* Switzerland */"
      2. 17:19, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* Switzerland */ Restore valid and correct sentence entirely supported by the alternate reference, but CE for passive voice and explain why."
    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
    1. 12:25, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Welcome to Wikipedia! (TW)"
    2. 17:06, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Schaffhausen. (TW)"
    3. 17:07, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* May 2018 */"
    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
    1. 13:28, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* OR */ Unbelievable"
    2. 13:32, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* OR */"
    3. 16:51, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* OR */ LOL"
    4. 16:52, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* OR */"
    5. 23:10, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* OR */"
    6. 23:11, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "/* OR */"
    Comments:

    Violates 3RR by using several IP sockets: 78.0.246.100, 86.153.135.111, 93.142.87.187, 93.139.89.201, 190.213.15.141, 93.136.77.51 despite unresolved dispute. ZH8000 (talk) 00:44, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    I'm not 86.153.135.111 nor 190.213.15.141 (I don't know who that is), the others are because my IP is dynamic. ZH8000 is the one who has done the most reverting and keeps calling me and 86.153.135.111 names (see talk page) and reporting to this noticeboard to get his way. See [38][39][40]. He/she is also trying to get the talk page protected to shut down the discussion [41]. 78.0.246.100 (talk) 01:17, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Result: Page semiprotected one month. The IP-hopper introduced their claim on 20 May that Switzerland's vignette is the 'most expensive in Europe for transiting passenger car drivers' and is warring to maintain it in the article even though no one else supports it. The claim can't be found in the source article and appears to be WP:OR. Consider the steps of WP:DR. A person who reverts from a fluctuating IP may run afoul of the WP:SOCK policy. EdJohnston (talk) 02:45, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Dennis Brown reported by User:Zefr (Result: No violation)

    Page: Carolina Reaper (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: Dennis Brown (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to: link here

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. [42]
    2. [43]
    3. [44]

    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: user's Talk page

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [45]

    Comments:
    I've notified Dennis Brown since Zefr failed to make the mandatory notification. Meters (talk) 01:45, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    It was done properly. See his Talk page history. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zefr (talkcontribs) 01:53, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    That's just an edit warring warning, not the mandatory notice that an AN3 report had been opened. Meters (talk) 02:10, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • No violation Dennis Brown is at 3RR, but has not violated it. Same applies to the complainant in this thread, it should be noted. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 01:57, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • I didn't hit 4RR, and I made it clear I wouldn't be reverting anymore today. Zefr is the problem here. First he reverts saying it is original research, yet CNN is the source. That failed, so next he's saying it has to have a MEDRS source (it doesn't, it isn't a medical article or claim, it is an event) His next reverts are linking to irrelevant policies. Not once has he explained why he thinks they apply, and uses only the edit summary and templating my page as communication. Three editors have decided the material is worth keeping, and he keeps shaking the magic 8 ball with a new reason in the summary, but no discussion until he was finally goaded to. I've used the talk page for every revert, I've compromised with the editors who agree on the content to make it better suited, I was happy to hear WHY he thought policy was against it but he refused to say why, just throwing links around, links that I don't think he fully understands the meaning of. The only editor that is just blind reverting without discussion and against 3 editors who agree on the content is Zefr. It isn't about the count of reverts, it's about the behavior around them. Dennis Brown - 02:04, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Despite Zefr's claim that Dennis Brown violated 3RR [46] [47] this is not correct. Brown undid this three times today, discussed it on the talk page, and stated that he was done with his reverts [48], all before this 3RR was opened. As far as I can tell Brown has not made this edit previously. Zefr restored his or her preferred version three times today [49] [50] [51], and had previously made the same [52] [53] or substantially similar [54] [55] [ this last diff likely does fall under MEDRS, see discussion below added at: 04:39, May 24, 2018‎ ] removals . I think we are into WP:BOOMERANG territory. Meters (talk) 02:05, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Seems to be WP:OWN behavior on Zefr's part just from reading Dennis' message above. Amaury (talk | contribs) 02:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    I would request that the behavior be examined more closely, understanding that mine will be as well. Dennis Brown - 02:08, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    The edits/purposed edits are very clearly in the MEDRS territory note for example that this [56] is taking a case report as being established fact and even the current wording is taking a very tenuous connection as being a well determined causation. There shouldn't be any debate that this should both fall under MEDRS and that it doesn't at all meet that established standard. Falconjh (talk) 03:46, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Irrelevant and misleading. This is a discussion of edit warring, not article content. That edit was 6 weeks ago and Dennis Brown did not make it and has not restored it. I agree that that version is very likely a MEDRS violation, but MEDRS is not one of the exemptions from edit warring per WP:NOT3RR, I'll add a comment to my previous listing of that edit by Zefr for consideration of any possible boomerang.. Meters (talk) 04:38, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Mr KEBAB reported by User:Softlavender (Result: )

    Page: Richard Wagner (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: Mr KEBAB (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to: [57]

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. [58]
    2. [59]
    3. [60]
    4. [61]

    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [62]

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

    Comments: