Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mhsprecher (talk | contribs) at 17:24, 26 November 2013 (→‎Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/American Sports Builders Association: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request diirectly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions on the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases
float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Boy_That_Time_Forgot

reasoning -216.57.96.1 (talk) 22:33, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Process_Hacker

Project has been around five years, referenced by SANS Institute IT security courses, PCWorld reviews, Gizmodo reviews, CNET reviews, Softpedia reviews, pcauthority reviews, Neowin reviews etc etc... You can find quite an extensive history over these five years via google, the page should not have been deleted and should be restored to allow cataloging this information about the project. -106.69.18.143 (talk) 00:35, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Process Hacker, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:30, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kriss "Kajun" Johnson

reasoning -24.1.15.166 (talk) 08:40, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Look in the history to see earlier editing. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:23, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to be alive

I need time to develop my article page.please undelete. -Vikas.manchikatla (talk) 10:20, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Helmholtz Alliance for Astroparticle Physics

I, Astrohap, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Astrohap (talk) 12:34, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 12:18, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pure DOPE Magazine

I, Arialyssa, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Arialyssa (talk) 17:25, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review: please update and submit it as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note that references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources are required in order to establish WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 12:27, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Southern Manor Country Club

I, 99.11.21.38, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. researching sources. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 99.11.21.38 (talk) 02:48, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 12:32, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lia Tarachansky

Morgan Spurlock is also a documentary maker whose work (and conclusions) are detailed in his entry; thus, describing a documentary maker's work is not promoting a political belief, it is describing the work of a public figure. Seen in this light, the removal of Ms. Tarachansky's page is tantamount to politicized censorship. She is a Canadian documentary filmmaker whose work interests me and I would very much like to read more. -99.247.185.195 (talk) 06:47, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Although this was a PROD nomination, the deleting administrator, user DGG (talk), considered that it also qualified for speedy deletion criterion WP:CSD#G11 unambiguous advertising or promotion. Nearly all the references were clips of her work from the network she writes for, and the article seemed something of a WP:COATRACK. To establish WP:Notability in Wikipedia's sense would require references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources about Ms Tarachansky, not just about the issues she writes on. I suggest you discuss this with DGG; he might be willing to restore the article for a discussion at WP:Articles for deletion, failing which you may appeal at WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 12:59, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If you can find just one article about her from any source but her own network, The Real News, I will restore the article. Of the 11 sources, not just that most of the sources are not independent--of the 11 sources, 8 are her own dispatches, 1 is an interview of her by her own network, and the other 2 general news stories about Israel that do not mention her, but relate to the events she reported on. DGG ( talk ) 18:54, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Elshad Nassirov

important person -Arongoldberg (talk) 06:51, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. This page was a copyright violation - a close copy of http://www.frankfurtgasforum.com. You must write in your own words - please read WP:Copy-paste and WP:Close paraphrasing. Also, it is not enough simply to state that a person is important: an article would need to show references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability. See also WP:Notability (people) and WP:Your first article. JohnCD (talk) 23:13, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Retro Television Network.png

This image is out-of-copyright, so hi-res deleted revisions should exist. -George Ho (talk) 08:04, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mitt Romney Paul Ryan logo.svg

This image is out-of-copyright, so revisions must be recovered. -George Ho (talk) 08:52, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • The only difference was adding a white border, otherwise they all look the same. SO this is pointless. No attributions are needed if this is PD-simple. Do you have a better reason for "revisions must be recovered"? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 19:57, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Charles W. Price

I, Joselwyn, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Joselwyn (talk) 13:39, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done Restored, though to show notability you will need to find some articles talking about him that are more than routine mentions, or at least reviews of his books. DGG ( talk ) 19:16, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Captain Ray

Content should not have been deleted but added but merged to the relevant parent page, Super Powers Collection -181.50.27.166 (talk) 16:28, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Makara (The Dragon in Sri Lanka)

I, 61.245.163.32, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 61.245.163.32 (talk) 16:46, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Warwick Economics Summit

The authors of this page acknowledge that the previous manifestation of this article was written in a heavily promotional way. I submit that the page should be undeleted so that the content can be rewritten in a way that can better be used for the benefit of Wikipedia's users. Furthermore, since last year the event has received more publicity and the statement of non-event is no longer valid. -82.30.158.147 (talk) 17:33, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warwick Economics Summit, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Splash (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. My suggestion is to create a draft nextt with good independent substantial sources. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:43, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Timo Pielmeier

to restore edit history of previously deleted article -Dolovis (talk) 19:20, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AutoTURN

reasoning -Cjohnstransoft (talk) 23:19, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello to Grahame Barlett,

You recently deleted a page/article called AutoTURN. We would like to request it's reinstatement, as we were in the process of adding content to enable the page to meet Wikipedia's guidelines. As I understand, we were deleted for being too promotional. We would like to point out that a competitor in our marketplace (Autodesk) has a very elaborate Wikipedia page which has numerous promotional items on the page. We are a small software company, so we don't have the huge writing staff that Autodesk has, but we do have a legitimate story to share on Wikipedia. We will write diligently to create a fact-based page that tells our story in an objective way.

A simple Google Search for AutoTURN generates multiple links for the product. There are over 30,000 users of AutoTURN in 120 countries, so we do have a following.

We respectfully request that our page be restored OR at least that we have access to the content that was stored there.

Thank you.

Chris Johns

Catherine Gross

This was deleted as the email address associated was not correct and so we didn't have an opportunity to update it. Catherine Gross has created original seminars that were the first of their kind for the BDSM leather communities. Some of her achievements are unique and historically important within the context of leather culture.Notnilla (talk) 00:20, 21 November 2013 (UTC)notnilla -Notnilla (talk) 00:20, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tenold Peterson: Artist

I, 99.197.151.31, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 99.197.151.31 (talk) 06:36, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tenold Peterson: Artist

reasoning -99.197.151.31 (talk) 06:37, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:CBS Television Studios.jpg

This image is copyright-ineligible. Undelete revisions? -George Ho (talk) 07:00, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mina Ghabel Lunde

I want to know how to improve my article so that it can be published -Lilleballerina (talk) 11:10, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Short answer: this is the English-language Wikipedia, and contributions should be in English; more importantly, in any language, Wikipedia is not a place for people to write about themselves. More advice on your talk page soon. JohnCD (talk) 14:07, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kathleen Peters

Appears to be notable -Candleabracadabra (talk) 15:15, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Would an admin kindly restore the pages history (it was deleted back in 2007). Thank you. Candleabracadabra (talk) 15:19, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Nothing worth restoring - 2007 version was not about the same person. It read "She is very rad and nice. She is married to <name>". JohnCD (talk) 15:38, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rousseau Metal

As discussed with Mark Arsten I updated the page with new links and references. Thank you. -Isabellelf (talk) 16:02, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - since this page was deleted after a deletion discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/Rousseau Metal, it will not be restored here. You should first contact user Mark Arsten (talk), the closing administrator, with a link to your new draft at User:Isabellelf/Rousseau Metal. If he agrees that you have overcome the reasons for deletion at the AfD, he can give you permission to post it. If he does not agree, you can appeal at WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 18:50, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mr HADI AZIZI

learing to change my page -Azizifamily44 (talk) 16:18, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment:: the page Hadi Azizi (businessman) has not been deleted, but if it is to be kept it needs references (a) to meet the WP:Verifiability policy: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source" and (b) to establish WP:Notability, which requires references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources.
If you are, or are related to, Mr Azizi, please read these pages:
JohnCD (talk) 18:59, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Foster (rugby league)

reasoning -Emma Baughurst (talk) 17:35, 21 November 2013 (UTC) hello, the page was created as a template was being made about the profile of the player who is the only member of the 2014 squad not to have a profile, was being copied and pasted from a word document which I previously scripted, I saved it to save progress and come back to edit it and the page has been deleted thankyou please may you restore the page so all the correct and proper information can be added to the wiki[reply]

thanks

checkY Userfied. The article said only "Alex Foster is a British rugby league player", and had been like that for over an hour. If you want to take time over developing an article, the best way is to make a draft page in your user space by clicking Help:Userspace draft and filling in the title. That makes a draft page which you can work on until it is ready to publish.
I have "userfied" this for you to User:Emma Baughurst/Alex Foster (rugby league) where you can work on it. Advice on your talk page soon. JohnCD (talk) 19:44, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Golfscript

I, Destynova, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Destynova (talk) 19:02, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I created this article stub in good faith and it was rejected for lack of notability. This is a rather subjective guideline in general, and since there was nothing wrong with the article itself, it seems needlessly wasteful (and discouraging) to delete it. It's not like the article takes up a significant amount of storage. Destynova (talk) 19:08, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
The submission was not "rejected" in April 2012 - only declined as not yet suitable for the encyclopedia, with an invitation to do more work on it. It was only deleted after it had been left untouched for more than 18 months, so that it appeared that you had abandoned it.
WP:Notability is not a subjective criterion: it asks for evidence of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject", see also WP:Notability (summary). Rather than the subjective "do we think this important or significant?", it asks the more objective question: "Is there evidence that people not connected with this think it important or significant?" JohnCD (talk) 20:12, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Pearson Artist

reasoning -Lib56 (talk) 01:07, 22 November 2013 (UTC) Hi there,[reply]

I thought my article was in a draft form and had not infact, been uploaded as finished. May I please access the original piece, so that I may attach the appropriate references and links.

Kind regards,

Elizabeth Fairleigh

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Lib56/Justin Pearson (artist). You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Jimfbleak (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space.
Read WP:Your first article, WP:Notability and WP:ARTIST, and note that you will need to show references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Also, take care not to write promotionally - the present draft reads like a gallery's puff-piece, full of "peacock terms", rather than an encyclopedia article, which requires a neutral point of view. JohnCD (talk) 10:09, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ron Linden

I, Marilyn Nix, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Thanks. Marilyn Nix (talk) 03:48, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review: please update and submit it as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for indefinite hosting of draft articles. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note that references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources are required in order to establish WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 10:02, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Abraham modal haplotype

I would like to request undelete since the sources were reliable being used as reference for the second artcile by Rozhadinii which makes it secondary source not primary source since the second study by Rozhadinii endorse it and speaks about the same sunject of klyosov. study. both studies are master studies according to ISOGG website and others which make the whole study (researcher, study, and journal) reliable. both articles are published in Proceedings of the russian academy of dna genealogy, which has issn and oclc but I forgot to put them thinking doi number suffice. also many articles studies referenced both articles klyosov 2009, and rozhadinii as immediately shown with googling where the study show cited by number articles. I also had a list of articles that referenced and cited the klyosov studies and also mentioned the abraham mh in their studies. Viibird (talk) 11:17, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abraham modal haplotype, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:06, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Elisabeth Rogan

Talk page of sockpuppet account of notorious sockpuppeteer. Deleted as "too old", which frankly doesn't apply when dealing with a person who has sockpuppeted for years and still continues to do so, and who continues to try multiple ways to cover his tracks as best possible (e.g. trying to "abandon" former sockpuppet accounts by making the password public, requesting deletion of user talk pages of blocked sockpuppet accounts etc etc.) -85.197.45.232 (talk) 14:41, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Same situation, same sockpuppeteer, different sockpuppet account. This deletion was actually requested by the banned user per right to vanish, which should be disregarded as a pure attempt at gaming the system – one of many over the last 6+ years. This sockpuppeteer should not be allowed to cover any of his tracks abusing Wikipedia processes, especially considering that the latest of his incessant ban evasions dates only to September 2013. -85.197.45.232 (talk) 14:41, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Same reasoning as above. -85.197.45.232 (talk) 14:47, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Richard Newton

I, Marilyn Nix, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Marilyn Nix (talk) 19:14, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks Marilyn Nix (talk) 19:14, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Missouri Route 242

I, Bloonstdfan360, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. --Bloonstdfan360 (talk • contribs) 03:58, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ekjaa - Unanimous Growth

I, Ekjaa, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Ekjaa (talk) 06:08, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:50, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Grandhi srinivas

reasoning -satyanarayana samatham 17:21, 23 November 2013 (UTC) https://www.facebook.com/GrandhiSrinivasFansbhimavaram — Preceding unsigned comment added by Satya3231 (talk • contribs) 17:23, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - your article was deleted because there was already an article at Grandhi Srinivas, and yours was too promotional in tone. You are welcome to add material to the existing article, but you must cite reliable sources for what you add, and maintain a neutral point of view - stuff like "considered a giant killer... A Dynamic personality... Striving hard for the development of Bhimavaram constituency" etc reads like an election pamphlet, not an encyclopedia article. JohnCD (talk) 17:43, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Festival of the Forks

Maggielanoue (talk) 21:28, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:49, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dundas Heights

I, Rybec, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. —rybec 00:22, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review: please update and submit it as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:53, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alexandre Naoumenko

I, Russki33, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Article was deleted due to inactivity for 6 months. I now have more materials and sources for the article and wish to improve it to a standard where it will be accepted and published. Russki33 (talk) 09:05, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:04, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Enterprise Configuration Management

I, Andrew J Barker, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Andrew J Barker (talk) 20:32, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:51, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Forestmill

I, Girlies mum, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Girlies mum (talk) 22:12, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dorsey Hall (Miami University)

reasoning -134.53.112.70 (talk) 01:12, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user DGG (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. Halld of residence do not often meet Wikipedia's WP:Notability requirement for significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources outside the University environment. JohnCD (talk) 09:57, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
and so I have: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dorsey Hall (Miami University) DGG ( talk ) 16:12, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ChaosNgn

I am not sure why this has been deleted. This is an actual game developer with a highly anticipated game coming out -Chaosngn (talk) 04:09, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User: Nautankifilms

it is an impotant article. -Nautankifilms (talk) 08:58, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request. Nothing of your work has been deleted. Have you lost User:Nautankifilms/sandbox, or Nautanki films? If you click on "contributions" you can see the list eg Special:Contributions/Nautankifilms. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:09, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Co-operative Socialism

I, 92.23.77.133, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 92.23.77.133 (talk) 09:24, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Thanks for fixing your request! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:28, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Onsert.jpg

Was moved to commons, who have since deleted it because it contains an image of a copyrighted work; no fair-use rationale is available on commons -Josh Parris 09:30, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • So what is your fair use rationale? This is obviously not public domain. The source however is evident from the picture, so a di-nosource is not appropriate. However it is not licensed freely. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:51, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Are you talking of the newspaper or the image not licensed freely? I'm unable to see the licensing information, but as the uploader I imagine I would have PD'd it - however, it was a long time ago. The image is not to illustrate the newspaper, but the onsert placed upon it; The image meets all of the fair use criteria:
    1. No free equivalent. Onserts are only placed onto commercial, copyrighted publications
    2. Respect for commercial opportunities. The newspaper issue in question is many years gone; there is no commerical loss to the publisher
    3. Minimal usage:
      1. Minimal number of items. One newspapers.
      2. Minimal extent of use. Only the above the fold part.
    4. Previous publication. The newspaper issue in question is many years gone
    5. Content. The image is educational, illustrating an article.
    6. Media-specific policy. Image meets Wikipedia:Image use policy.
    7. One-article minimum. used in onsert
    8. Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. Check.
    9. Restrictions on location. used in onsert
    10. Image description page. Can't comment, I can't see the image etc.
    Also, OTHERSTUFFEXISTS (I know), but look: File:Newsstand.jpg has plenty of copyrighted works depicted. It's on commons. Josh Parris 00:00, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All subpages of Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Robert I

This requests concerns talk and subpages of this old 2006 arbcom case. As noted at Wikipedia_talk:ARBCOM#Courtesy_deletion.3F, the deletion, not supported by our policies, was done due to technical reasons, no longer valid. Those pages should be undeleted (and than immediately courtesy blanked). -Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:58, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/GMAT Pill Study Method Online Video Course

I, Fushion83, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Fushion83 (talk) 16:28, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review: please update and submit it as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article for advice. JohnCD (talk) 19:03, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Kolins

I have no idea why it doesn't fit the rules. I have seen other pages similarly short about 1 specific person who has no real historic significance, but is an active participant in current events in a local area. I am a teacher, and an artist, I have seen other artists posted on wikipedia. I also can not contact the guy who deleted it (MrX) and ask him for why he deleted it, and how I can improve it so it won't happen again. -MathGeek83 (talk) 17:02, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. I am sorry that Wikipedia does not make clearer at sign-up time that it is not a social-networking site like LinkedIn or Myspace for people to write about themselves. It is a quite different sort of site, a project to build an encyclopedia, and writing about oneself is strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at WP:Autobiography and WP:Conflict of interest. For other articles you may have seen, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS; the inclusion criteria are in fact quite demanding, requiring evidence of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources, see also WP:ARTIST. JohnCD (talk) 18:59, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So basically, the others got there first, you won't take them down because they were there first, and no one else can do it, because you've changed the rules after they got posted. When I see these similar sites, should I send you messages about them for them to be deleted too? I didn't realize that wikipedia considers a description about an artist and educator to be the same thing that would be on that persons social networking site. I certainly kept it extremely professional. How many citations would be required? I have been published, my work exhibited, and interviewed. What exactly is required? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MathGeek83 (talk • contribs) 13:53, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The expected standards are set out at WP:Notability and WP:Notability (people). If, having read those, you observe pages which you think do not meet their requirements, you are free to tag them for deletion as described in WP:Deletion policy; but please also read WP:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. Note that the threshold for speedy deletion is no credible claim of significance or importance, which is a lower standard than notability.
The difference from social-networking sites is that they are intended for people to tell the world about themselves, but Wikipedia explicitly is not, in order to avoid conflict of interest and maintain a neutral point of view. Even notable persons are advised to leave it to someone else to write about them.
For further advice, read what I wrote to another autobiographer at User talk:WilHarris#Advice, ignoring the references to WP:MUSICBIO which is a special notability standard for musical performers. JohnCD (talk) 15:45, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wade Bergman

Please restore edit history for this recently recreated article -Dolovis (talk) 20:10, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

please undelete Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Urinothorax

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Urinothorax

I, Eastmain, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 20:29, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The submission was deleted because it had gone 6 months without an edit. Without the text, can you explain why the submission had languished for that long without any improvement? Hasteur (talk) 20:48, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am not the creator of the submission, and do not know why the submitter didn't follow up. Perhaps he or she felt bitten, although I have no way of knowing. Nonetheless, the topic appears to be notable. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 23:54, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Additional references on this topic can be found in this search. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 00:46, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sion Cathedral

Not a controversial or unnotable topic. -Riggabbert (talk) 22:04, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bradley L Baker

References are okay, Please re-check and give me more time to contribute -Khocon 03:56, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Blady

I do apologize for submitting and incomplete article but I was in the process of adding the information (such as charts, references and other data) to create the article and was unaware that the article would be contested so quickly. The group is a legitimate and well established band and will probably get an article even if I cease to edit it. If you choose to not restore it, could I at least be given the source code so I can continue to edit the article and provide a better article. Thanks again. RatiziAngeloucontribs 16:55, 26 November 2013 (UTC) -RatiziAngeloucontribs 16:55, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chuck_Harder

reasoning -98.77.91.154 (talk) 17:22, 26 November 2013 (UTC) Chuck Harder was one of the top 10 talk show radio hosts in the USA during the 1980's and is very well known by tens (hundreds?) of millions of listeners. Multiple Wikipedia pages reference him. Deletion of his page is unwarranted and the page should be reinstated. Thank you.[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/American Sports Builders Association

I, Mhsprecher, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Mhsprecher (talk) 17:22, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/American Sports Builders Association

Continuing with edits -Mhsprecher (talk) 17:24, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=583408971"