User talk:TonyTheTiger: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Millennium Park: new section
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 190: Line 190:


Looking at the map, I think [[Lurie Garden]] is the second largest feature in the park, so that might be my preference over the theater. [[User:Ruhrfisch|Ruhrfisch]] '''[[User talk:Ruhrfisch|<sub><font color="green">&gt;&lt;&gt;</font></sub><small>&deg;</small><sup><small>&deg;</small></sup>]]''' 11:58, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
Looking at the map, I think [[Lurie Garden]] is the second largest feature in the park, so that might be my preference over the theater. [[User:Ruhrfisch|Ruhrfisch]] '''[[User talk:Ruhrfisch|<sub><font color="green">&gt;&lt;&gt;</font></sub><small>&deg;</small><sup><small>&deg;</small></sup>]]''' 11:58, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi. Good to see this at FAC. Can I recommend you add [[:File:2005-10-13 2880x1920 chicago above millennium park.jpg]] as the main image in the infobox instead as the main image should be an overivew of the whole complex rather than a restricted view in a concert.... I haven't switched images myself as I know you are often very strict with image layout in the article. If possible I'd recommend somebody creates a montage which could combine the two images or even one or two others in the main image, but I think [[:File:2005-10-13 2880x1920 chicago above millennium park.jpg]] would be far better as the main than the one at present and immediately gices an understanding of the site...[[User:Dr. Blofeld| <span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px;"> <font style="color:#fef;background:black;">'''''Dr. Blofeld'''''</font>]]</span> <sup>[[User talk:Dr. Blofeld| <font size="-4"><font color="Black">White cat</font></font color> ]]</sup> 12:19, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:20, 11 January 2010

affiliations
WikiProject Chicago WP:CHICAGO
Director
(2006–present)
Four Award WP:FOUR
Director
(2009–2014)
(disputed, 2013–2014)
W Awards WP:WAWARD
Director
(2010–present)
WALRUS committee M:WALRUS
Committee
(2011–2013)
(2016–present)
Online Ambassadors WP:Ambassadors
(2011–2012)
2010 WP:CUP
2nd place
Most WP:DYKs in a round



Tony The Tiger interpretation: Freedom of expression does not exist unless freedom of expression is protected when and where the audience exists.



Recently listed good articles: Lynching of Norris DendyVan BurenUnified (concert)Verteba CaveMutahharten69 (number)Mandanna, RashmikaCheetah reintroduction in IndiaHypericum aciferumVenus de MiloPsyduckTerror TrainPerfect graph"The Star Beast""Wait a Minute" (The Pussycat Dolls song)



The oldest unreviewed good article nominations are: Madame X (album) (talk | history | start review) • Gedling Town F.C. (talk | history | start review) • Reggie Barnes (skateboarder) (talk | history | start review) • Exile (American band) (talk | history | start review) • Jude Law (talk | history | start review)


Articles currently listed for Good article community reassessment:


Tigers on my userpage (feel free to add "free use" tiger)

If you appreciate my work above leave a tiger below. If you have trouble finding one that you don't see below go to http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Tiger and click on any of the subspecies to see more Images.

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting --~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.


2010 Greetings

   

HAPPY NEW YEAR

This is Carcassonne in southern France where I spent Christmas, safely away from Wiki temptations. Back to work now. I hope you have a great year in 2010 for writing, reviewing, or whatever takes your fancy by way of increasing the Chicago profile. Always willing to help when I can. Brianboulton (talk) 23:08, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Conflicted licensing images

Given the updates you did on other images with this issue, I hope these can be resolved relatively quickly :)

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:41, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps update

Thanks to everyone's efforts to the GA Sweeps process, we are currently over 90% done with only 226 articles remain to be swept! As always, I want to thank you for using your time to ensure the quality of the older GAs. With over 50 members participating in Sweeps, that averages out to about 4 articles per person! If each member reviews an article once a week this month (or several!), we'll be completely finished. At that point, awards will be handed out to reviewers. As an added incentive, if we complete over 100 articles reviewed this month, I will donate $100 to Wikipedia Forever on behalf of all GA Sweeps participants. I hope that this incentive will help to increase our motivation for completing Sweeps while supporting Wikipedia in the process. If you have any questions about reviews or Sweeps let me know and I'll be happy to get back to you. Again, thank you for taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 00:18, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above noted image or media file appears to have conflicted licensing. As an image cannot be both 'free' and 'unfree', a check of the exact status of this media/image concerned is advised.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:46, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:20080514 Trump Chicago Kiosk.JPG

⚠
Thanks for uploading File:20080514 Trump Chicago Kiosk.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:08, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conflicted licensing on image File:20090619 Hadid pavilion.JPG

The above noted image or media file appears to have conflicted licensing. As an image cannot be both 'free' and 'unfree', a check of the exact status of this media/image concerned is advised.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:42, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above noted image or media file appears to have conflicted licensing. As an image cannot be both 'free' and 'unfree', a check of the exact status of this media/image concerned is advised.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:45, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cycle Center

Thanks for the nice note. You are so productive that I lose track of which article is in what condition. I'm glad the cycle center, which I remember well, made FA. Happy New Year! Finetooth (talk) 02:05, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Swimsuit Issue template list has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:06, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Mesko

My pleasure, Tony. By the way, would you mind glancing at Todd Boyd? The article still refers to "Obama’s potential election", which is a little embarrassing at this point. - Biruitorul Talk 02:24, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I noticed that. Congrats on it. What are you currently working on. I'd be glad to help copyedit when I have a spare moment.. Dr. Blofeld White cat 11:08, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ambitious eh. I'll help you out with the Chicago articles. I want to complete the set! Dr. Blofeld White cat 22:37, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll keep my eye on McCormick Tribune Plaza & Ice Rink. That would be a good one to develop to FA next in the Millenium set... Dr. Blofeld White cat 22:40, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tick, Tock

I am concerned that you are not having enough time to work on Near South Side, Chicago's GAR. Do you want me to extended the deadline again or something? GamerPro64 (talk) 23:30, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jay Pritzker Pavilion

Thanks for the heads up - I archived the peer review (and I see you have already fixed the article history). I also looked at the dabs and external links and made a few minor fixes there - one Financial Times link was dead, so I just commented out the URL and converted the {{cite web}} template to {{cite news}}. Also found a broken ISBN so fixed that with the ISBN from WorldCat.

Thanks too for the Cycle Center notice. I added a Tiger above - cheated a little on the date to keep your streak going. If you prefer I will use a more conventional dating system. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 01:23, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Red Tail Project

Updated DYK query On January 6, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Red Tail Project, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Materialscientist (talk) 00:00, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thought I'd alert you that I've placed the article up for peer review here. Thanks for the suggestion! Truthkeeper88 (talk) 21:55, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Red Tail Reborn

Updated DYK query On January 7, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Red Tail Reborn, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Materialscientist (talk) 12:00, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above noted image or media file appears to have conflicted licensing. As an image cannot be both 'free' and 'unfree', a check of the exact status of this media/image concerned is advised.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football

I think you'll want to check out this discussion: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject College football#Articles for each year's roster of a specific team? Thanks, Jweiss11 (talk) 20:12, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kate

Thanks for letting me know, Tony. I worked quite hard on the article over time and think it is in fairly good condition. I'm looking forward to working with you on it. (I promise not to take as long as I took on Scarlett Johannson!) Wildhartlivie (talk) 05:41, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I was just reading through and found a typo error and I have a couple WP:GARs (Forest Whitaker and Ben Stiller sitting on my plate plus one waiting for checking after updating it (Daniel Day-Lewis). I'm busy too. Good luck! Wildhartlivie (talk) 05:55, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for The Restorers

Updated DYK query On January 9, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Restorers, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Materialscientist (talk) 18:00, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Flight of the Red Tail

Updated DYK query On January 10, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Flight of the Red Tail, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.
Materialscientist (talk) 00:00, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

Woo-hoo! Ruhrfisch ><>°° 01:27, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Television ratings

Unfortunately, I don't know of any good complete archival source. American television ratings are generally provided by Nielsen, but the problem is that to get large sets of historical ratings, one has to pay some kind of subscription fee. Without doing so, one basically has to resort to Googling for specific news articles and for entertainment sites which provide more recent data. Also, to clarify, I was pulling those specific television ratings out from the pre-merge page history, so I was not the one who originally added them. —Lowellian (reply) 07:54, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Millennium Park

Looking at the map, I think Lurie Garden is the second largest feature in the park, so that might be my preference over the theater. Ruhrfisch ><>°° 11:58, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Good to see this at FAC. Can I recommend you add File:2005-10-13 2880x1920 chicago above millennium park.jpg as the main image in the infobox instead as the main image should be an overivew of the whole complex rather than a restricted view in a concert.... I haven't switched images myself as I know you are often very strict with image layout in the article. If possible I'd recommend somebody creates a montage which could combine the two images or even one or two others in the main image, but I think File:2005-10-13 2880x1920 chicago above millennium park.jpg would be far better as the main than the one at present and immediately gices an understanding of the site... Dr. Blofeld White cat 12:19, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]