Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring

Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard
This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule. See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report. If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page. You must notify any user you have reported. You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so. You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. Additional notes When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first. The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from. Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection. Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed. Definition of edit warring Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring. Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR) An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions. Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.
Click here to create a new report

User:Qenneth reported by User:Novem Linguae (Result: )

Page: Fanta (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Qenneth (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 06:33, 21 April 2021 (UTC) "I will also start a discussion on the talk page. Please follow the wiki guidelines and do not remove until consensus."
2. 06:05, 21 April 2021 (UTC) "Undid revision 1018876992 by StefanoTrv (talk) No information about why this was undone in discussions page"
3. 08:23, 20 April 2021 (UTC) "Undid revision 1018854819 by Poltair (talk) Updating again, don't understand what is "rv - unhelpful" means. Message on my wall doesn't elaborate either."
4. 06:16, 20 April 2021 (UTC) "This is not vandalism, I'm contributing to Wikipedia by updating to correct information. Please check other wikis to verify."
5. 5th revert

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 06:09, 21 April 2021 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Fanta."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on user talk page:

1. Consecutive edits made from 06:10, 21 April 2021 (UTC) to 08:30, 21 April 2021 (UTC) on User talk:Qenneth

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AFanta&type=revision&diff=1019059407&oldid=1019041812

Comments:

I tried to tell them on their user talk page, but they doubled down. They also reverted (23:33) after the warning (23:09). I request a block. –Novem Linguae (talk) 08:54, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

• After I reverted Qenneth, he has chosen to engage in retalitatory editing, undoing one of my edits on an article he's never touched before. This is outright disruptive WP:POINTy behaviour. — Czello 09:21, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
  • Czello, first you undo my edit and say edits needs consensus, when I did undo your edit, you say its retaliation? How is Wikipedia suppose to work? Should all edits first be discussed in the talk page before added to the page? Or is it allowed to add text directly to the page. Please let me know because it seems wierd that one user have to first go through talk page and the other not. I have mainly done edits on Swedish Wikipedia and do not know how English Wikipedia is, but I guess I will learn now. Qenneth (talk) 09:30, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
    • @Qenneth:, you cannot possibly think that an uncontroversial punctuation change is comparable to adding a literal Nazi flag to a soft drink article. Do you see why you need to go to the talk page for your edit? — Czello 09:58, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
      • @Czello:, I don't see any controversy in adding the flag of the country where it was invented, No. How can fact be controversial? I also have asked for response in the talk page, but no one showed up. Everyone is just keen to "undo" but not say why. Very contra productive. Qenneth (talk) 11:36, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
        • I have engaged, constructively I hope, on the article's talk page. The situation seems to have calmed and I must admit that my revert comment of 'unhelpful' was not helpful in explaining the issue, I took it to be vandalism. Poltair (talk) 09:41, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

          I politely disagree that this has calmed down. Qenneth restored disputed content for a 5th time tonight, so this is still active. –Novem Linguae (talk) 09:46, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

          Hey EdJohnston, sorry for the ping. Can you take a look at this one when you get a chance? I don't want it to get accidentally skipped. Thank you. –Novem Linguae (talk) 03:53, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

User:விக்னேஷ்வர் பா மாளுசுத்தியார் reported by User:2409:4072:6D14:434A:97D1:396D:F03F:EBF2 (Result: EC protected)

Page: Kallar (caste) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: விக்னேஷ்வர் பா மாளுசுத்தியார் (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 04:49, 19 April 2021 No edit summary
2. 04:49, 19 April 2021 No edit summary
3. 09:40, 19 April 2021 No edit summary
4. 11:58, 21 April 2021 No edit summary
5. 11:58, 21 April 2021 No edit summary
6. 14:14, 21 April 2021 No edit summary
7. 15:31, 21 April 2021 No edit summary
8. 16:45, 21 April 2021 No edit summary

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:[1]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Nothing

Comments:
Has a history of socking and edit warring. Writes flattery with dubious sources and edit wars with it and removes content and edit wars with other users. Called me a fake id for notifying him about this.[2] . User is disruptive in this particular page for a long time, support a partial block. 2409:4072:6D14:434A:97D1:396D:F03F:EBF2 (talk) 12:25, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

• Result: I've put Kallar (caste) under EC protection under authority of WP:ARBIPA. It appears that caste articles are often targeted by new editors unfamiliar with Wikipedia standards. More backgrund for the caste issue can be seen at WP:GS/Caste. EdJohnston (talk) 03:40, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

User:Jeaubear reported by User:Binksternet (Result: Blocks)

Page: Angel Miners & the Lightning Riders (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported:

• Jeaubear (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
• 2600:1702:14E0:D46F:0:0:0:0/64 (block range · block log (global) · WHOIS (partial))

Previous version reverted to: [3]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. Apr 19, 04:03 UTC – [4] IP revert
2. Apr 19, 04:07 UTC – [5] IP revert
3. Apr 19, 15:30 UTC – [6] IP revert
4. Apr 20, 15:57 UTC – [7] Jeaubear revert
5. Apr 21, 20:40 UTC – [8] Jeaubear revert

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [9]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [10]

Comments:

• Jeaubear has been continuing the edit warring pattern of Metairie, Louisiana, IP range Special:Contributions/2600:1702:14E0:D46F:0:0:0:0/64 at two articles: Angel Miners & the Lightning Riders and also at Awolnation, where they are at three reverts. The disputed edits on both pages involve the IPs adding text cited to Instagram, and Jeaubear following directly after to tweak the IP text a few minutes later[11][12] or to restore the text and continue the edit war. The basic problem is that the disputed text is based on Instagram posts and not WP:SECONDARY sources, but Jeaubear and the IPs have worked together in violation of WP:MULTIPLE, which is why we are here. Binksternet (talk) 22:46, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

After the editor has had time to respond, unless there is a good excuse I think a block for logged-out edit warring is likely due to WP:DUCK. EdJohnston (talk) 03:48, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

• Result: The user has continued to edit without replying here. User:Jeaubear is blocked 72 hours for apparent logged-out edit warring, the /64 IP is blocked for a month. EdJohnston (talk) 13:42, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Pahela Baishakh Page

Dear Administrator

Please have a look at the Pahela Baishakh page.

There has been a controversy there since at least April 2017. This pertains to the origins of the Bengali New Year. There are two theories - Mughal and Vikramaditya/Hindu/Bikramaditto/Indic.

More recently most information with citations pertaining to the latter theory were deleted. I tried restoring some of that information from previous versions compiled by other editors like Sarah Welch. Whenever I did so, the material I restored was reverted.

I didn’t delete any existing material.

The page will benefit from an independent review. I did try explaining what I did on the Talk Page. I didn’t succeed. An anonymous IP number is very active in reverting my efforts at restoring the earlier information. I am not sure whether sockpuppetry is involved. I seek an independent read of what's happening. I had alerted other editors/administrators too.

This is not a complaint on any individual. Its about the page's neutrality.

Thank you

Dipendra2007 (talk) 10:41, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

User:Chynapras reported by User:Spike 'em (Result: Blocked)

Page: Babar Azam (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Chynapras (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 04:59, 22 April 2021 (UTC) "Mate, please you discuss it. I am gonna stay with this one. No other editor, not even senior editors, isn’t reverting this edit then why are you?"
2. 15:18, 21 April 2021 (UTC) "Mate, it doesn’t matter if you disagree giving Kohli at the lead"
3. Consecutive edits made from 11:59, 21 April 2021 (UTC) to 12:00, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
   1. 11:59, 21 April 2021 (UTC) ""
   2. 12:00, 21 April 2021 (UTC) ""
4. 08:33, 20 April 2021 (UTC) "This is the better version actually."

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

1. 08:46, 20 April 2021 (UTC) "/* Lead section */ new section"
2. 12:35, 21 April 2021 (UTC) "/* Lead section */"
3. 06:54, 22 April 2021 (UTC) "/* Lead section */"

Comments:

User refuses to discuss additions sensibly on both this article and Chris Woakes Spike 'em (talk) 06:58, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

User is at least engaging on talk page, but has made no effort to explain why their edits are better or attempt to edit collaboratively. Spike 'em (talk) 10:01, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Blocked – 48 hours. EdJohnston (talk) 00:59, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

User:Berocca Addict reported by User:Slatersteven (Result: EC protected)

Page: Brian Rose (podcaster) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Berocca Addict (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [13]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [14]
2. [15]
3. [16]
4. [17]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [18]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [19]

Comments:

Note they have in fact blown through 4rr now, all over what is at best a rather trival point that really adds nothing.Slatersteven (talk) 13:57, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Also I will add the material was added by Willbartlett02 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), who was blocked shortly after adding it.Slatersteven (talk) 14:05, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

This editor has a lengthy history of questionable editing in relation to BLPs, including their similarly named Berrocca addict (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) account. See for example this edit where they add negative commentary referenced only to an article by the subject, or this edit (one of several attempts at that article) where they add negative information refernced to tweets by third parties in violation of WP:BLPSPS. FDW777 (talk) 14:57, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Mmm very strong not here if you ask me.Slatersteven (talk) 15:20, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

And another user has not shown up to add it, and edit warring over it.Slatersteven (talk) 19:28, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

• Result: EC protected three months. Edit warring by IPs and new editors. EdJohnston (talk) 00:32, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

User:Rusdo reported by User:Tgeorgescu (Result: EC protected)

Page: Vaticinium ex eventu (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: Rusdo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 21:11, 22 April 2021 (UTC) "Discussion ongoing on talk page, need to build consensus"
2. Consecutive edits made from 17:21, 22 April 2021 (UTC) to 17:22, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
   1. 17:21, 22 April 2021 (UTC) "/* In religious writings */"
   2. 17:22, 22 April 2021 (UTC) "grammar"
3. 15:39, 21 April 2021 (UTC) "Please stop undoing beneficial contributions to the page. Thank you."
4. Consecutive edits made from 14:54, 21 April 2021 (UTC) to 15:16, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
   1. 14:54, 21 April 2021 (UTC) "/* In religious writings */"
   2. 14:55, 21 April 2021 (UTC) "fixed link"
   3. 15:16, 21 April 2021 (UTC) "fixing links that weren't working"
5. [20]
6. [21]

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 23:45, 21 April 2021 (UTC) "A summary of site policies and guidelines you may find useful"
2. 14:01, 22 April 2021 (UTC) "/* No original research of Ancient or Medieval sources */ my point"
3. 17:29, 22 April 2021 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Vaticinium ex eventu."
4. 18:18, 22 April 2021 (UTC) "/* April 2021 */ WP:3RR"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

1. 12:44, 22 April 2021 (UTC) "/* Gospel Dating */ quote offered"
2. 16:48, 22 April 2021 (UTC) "/* Gospel Dating */ tiny minorities"
3. 16:55, 22 April 2021 (UTC) "/* Gospel Dating */ quote offered"
4. 17:12, 22 April 2021 (UTC) "/* Gospel Dating */ what neutrality means for us"
5. 17:29, 22 April 2021 (UTC) "/* Gospel Dating */ spoil your fun"
6. 17:31, 22 April 2021 (UTC) "/* Gospel Dating */ too old"
7. 17:45, 22 April 2021 (UTC) "/* Gospel Dating */ idea is very simple"
8. 17:51, 22 April 2021 (UTC) "/* Gospel Dating */ WP:RS which complies with WP:RS/AC"
9. 17:59, 22 April 2021 (UTC) "/* Gospel Dating */ quote offered"
10. 18:04, 22 April 2021 (UTC) "/* Gospel Dating */ some POVs lost the dispute"
11. 18:04, 22 April 2021 (UTC) "/* Gospel Dating */ indent"
12. 18:10, 22 April 2021 (UTC) "/* Gospel Dating */ WP:IDHT"
13. 18:22, 22 April 2021 (UTC) "/* Gospel Dating */ Which are your sources?"
14. 18:23, 22 April 2021 (UTC) "/* Gospel Dating */ indent"
15. 18:46, 22 April 2021 (UTC) "/* Gospel Dating */ the gist"
16. 20:30, 22 April 2021 (UTC) "/* Gospel Dating */ red herring"
17. 20:46, 22 April 2021 (UTC) "/* Gospel Dating */ set in stone"
18. 20:48, 22 April 2021 (UTC) "/* Gospel Dating */ both the defenders and the opponents"
19. 20:51, 22 April 2021 (UTC) "/* Gospel Dating */ WP:SCHOLARSHIP"
20. 21:02, 22 April 2021 (UTC) "/* Gospel Dating */ logic and evidence"
21. 21:02, 22 April 2021 (UTC) "/* Gospel Dating */ typo"

Comments:

Also edit warring as 172.58.35.43 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). Tgeorgescu (talk) 21:23, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

• Result: Page is EC protected two months, due to edit warring by IPs and new users. EdJohnston (talk) 00:55, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

User:Pedro158 reported by User:Chipmunkdavis (Result: one week, partial)

Page: Philippines (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Pedro158 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [22] (first revert, duplicated below)

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [23] (undoing very arbitrary edits by User:Showiecz in 3 December)
2. [24] (Undid revision 1019276186 by Chipmunkdavis (talk) not much...)
3. [25] (Undid revision 1019396486 by Chipmunkdavis (talk) please discuss)
4. [26] (Undid revision 1019400779 by Chipmunkdavis (talk))

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: I haven't left a warning, but they left me a warning, so presumably they are aware.

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on user talk page: [27]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page; [28]

Comments:
Bringing here following my talk page reply being responded to with an EW notice and nothing else since. Discussion was limited, but the template felt like somewhat of a termination. It also felt a bit much given it was done simultaneously with another revert to war in their desired edit. CMD (talk) 05:34, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Blocked – for a period of one week. Partial block. Not technically a 3RR violation, but concerning conduct. Also, the change does seem to place the article —a country article which is very high profile— in a state of disrepair (visually). Not acutely, but enough that the WP:ONUS maxim is expected to be followed more strictly than normal. I realize the user only has 2 edits to their talk page (including the notice for this very report), but if they're issuing uw-3rr warnings, they pretty much know what's up. El_C 13:19, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

User:2A02:1812:1533:1D00:7D85:48B9:FAD1:4B67 reported by User:Tommi1986 (Result: Already blocked)

Page: Mondaire Jones (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported: 2A02:1812:1533:1D00:7D85:48B9:FAD1:4B67 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 15:52, 23 April 2021 (UTC) ""
2. Consecutive edits made from 15:49, 23 April 2021 (UTC) to 15:51, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
   1. 15:49, 23 April 2021 (UTC) ""
   2. 15:50, 23 April 2021 (UTC) ""
   3. 15:50, 23 April 2021 (UTC) ""
   4. 15:51, 23 April 2021 (UTC) ""
3. 15:34, 23 April 2021 (UTC) "Undid revision 1019478910 by 74.104.114.233 (talk)"
4. 15:16, 23 April 2021 (UTC) "Undid revision 1019476628 by Muboshgu (talk)"
5. Consecutive edits made from 15:11, 23 April 2021 (UTC) to 15:12, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
   1. 15:11, 23 April 2021 (UTC) ""
   2. 15:12, 23 April 2021 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. 15:53, 23 April 2021 (UTC) "Only warning: Addition of defamatory content."

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

Comments:

Adding defamatory content, reverted by 3 editors warnings removed from talk page Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 15:56, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

User also left a personal attack on my talk page [29] Tommi1986 ^{let's talk!} 15:58, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

• Already blocked ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:10, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

User:24.45.8.137 reported by User:Jkaharper (Result: one week)

Moved from WP:AN

 – ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:07, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Hi, could an administrator please block the follow IP address?

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/24.45.8.137

Reasons:

• IP consistently comes on to Wikipedia each day and makes the same edits repeatedly, usually on the pages of centenarian BLPs to add unsourced trivial sentences about their 100th birthdays, without any source [examples: Phyllis Latour, Kenneth O. Chilstrom). When I have reverted and prompted the editor to add only sourced content, he/she restores their original edit and then just adds a "citation needed" template at the end of the sentence.
• IP continues to edit war.
• IP has been encouraged to change tact, informed of rules and procedures, and then warned repeated times but continues to disregard ALL constructive feedback and fails to compromise.

Thanks --Jkaharper (talk) 23:56, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Blocked – for a period of 1 week for repeatedly edit warring in BLP articles. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:05, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

User:Bibfortuna69 reported by User:Neovu79 (Result: )

Page: 2021 Miami Dolphins season (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) and Template:Miami Dolphins roster (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Bibfortuna69 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [30] and [31]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 2021 Miami Dolphins season diff 1
2. 2021 Miami Dolphins season diff 2
3. 2021 Miami Dolphins season diff 3
4. Template:Miami Dolphins roster diff 1
5. Template:Miami Dolphins roster diff 2

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: SunDawn left a warning to the user on 15 April 2021. And I too gave a warning on 24 April 2021 but the user kept reverting.

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page; [diff]

Comments:

Bibfortuna69 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has repeatedly blanked the 2021 Miami Dolphins season Draft Pick grid throughout the past week and repeatedly added inaccurate player positions on Template:Miami Dolphins roster. Neovu79 (talk) 05:59, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

This user has once again undid the revision in 2021 Miami Dolphins season here without first consulting on Talk:2021 Miami Dolphins season or responding on this review. I will not undo that edit pending a resolution. Neovu79 (talk) 14:23, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

User:Giorgi Mechurchle reported by User:Wikaviani (Result: )

Page: Safavid Georgia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Giorgi Mechurchle (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [32]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [33]
2. [34]
3. [35]
4. [36]
5. [37]
6. [38]
7. [39]
8. [40]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [41]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [42]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page; [43]

Comments:

The reported editor is edit-warring against 3 editors, has been editing Wikipedia for about 12 years and thus, should be well aware of our guidlines. Repeated addition of unsourced/poorly sourced content to a GA.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:32, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

I am well aware about guidlines and provide only sourced information. These three users (Wikaviani LouisAragon HistoryofIran)are vandalising Wikipedia and try to use in article terms and names which are not received academically, but to persianise the names and titles of Georgian kings and political entities.Giorgi Mechurchle (talk) 16:32, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

In addition to WP:WAR, said user "Giorgi Mechurchle" is structurally violating WP:VER and WP:OR in a GA-class article. Looking at the compelling evidence, it is safe to say that this user is not here to build this encyclopedia. - LouisAragon (talk) 16:49, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

User "Giorgi Mechurchle" continues to revert as we speak (6 reverts at Safavid Georgia), and is now also initiating an edit-war at Georgia (country).[44] - LouisAragon (talk) 18:28, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

8 reverts by user "Giorgi Mechurchle" as we speak. - LouisAragon (talk) 22:55, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

User:2600:8805:1006:8400:E0B7:CB5E:B16D:7B9 reported by User:Biruitorul (Result: )

Page: Corneliu Zelea Codreanu (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 2600:8805:1006:8400:E0B7:CB5E:B16D:7B9 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [45]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [46]
2. [47]
3. [48]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [49]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page; [50]

Comments:
The user clearly has no intention of editing productively, instead determinedly reverting to his preferred version, which has a host of issues. Also, the reference to “Wikipedia policies” makes me suspect a sockpuppet. — Biruitorul ^Talk 18:33, 24 April 2021 (UTC)