Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Petextrodon (talk | contribs) at 20:03, 12 April 2024 (→‎User:Cossde reported by User:Petextrodon (Result: Stale)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

    Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard
    Shortcuts
    Update this page

    This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

    You must notify any user you have reported.

    You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    Additional notes
    • When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
    • The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
    • Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
    • Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.
    Definition of edit warring
    Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.
    Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)
    An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.

    Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

    Click here to create a new report

    User:76.64.196.209 reported by User:Moxy (Result: Blocked from two articles for 72 hours)

    Page: Prime Minister of Canada (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: 76.64.196.209 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 00:31, 10 April 2024 (UTC) "I explained very clearly. See my edit summaries."
    2. 23:08, 9 April 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1218059110 by Iwaqarhashmi (talk) - Please explain why you are restoring factually incorrect material that has been reverted."
    3. 12:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1217984720 by GoodDay (talk) - Please explain why you are restoring factually-incorrect information that was reverted."
    4. 00:26, 9 April 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1217943626 by Moxy (talk) - Please explain why you are restoring factually-incorrect information that was reverted."
    5. 19:43, 8 April 2024 (UTC) "None of this has anything to do with a prime minister who has resigned after losing the confidence of Parliament."

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 23:19, 9 April 2024 (UTC) "Welcome to Wikipedia!"

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    No luck with any response to inquiries on their talk page. Moxy🍁 00:39, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    They are also exhibiting the same behavior over at John Turner John Turner revision history. All we need to do is get their attention get them talking.... or at the very least replying to us. Moxy🍁 00:42, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Blocked – for a period of 72 hours from Prime Minister of Canada and John Turner. Daniel Case (talk) 18:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:RowanJ_LP reported by User:Jimmybingus (Result: Declined)

    Page: Johnny Somali (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: RowanJ_LP (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)


    Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. [1]
    2. [2]
    3. [3]
    4. [4]



    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [5]

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [6] User did not tell me to resolve the dispute on the talk page until after he's reported me.]

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [7]

    Comments:

    User continuously erases the Controversies sub paragraph of his somali identity, uses a foreign BBC article that claims he said he was somali in a video while the article did not provide the video, citations i used was a tiktok video of himself stating his father was oromo and his mother was yemeni. there is more evidence for him being Oromo then there is for him being Somali. [8] He also failed to tell me to dispute this on the Johnny Somali talk page until after reporting me. [9]

    • Both editors blocked – for a period of 24 hours Aoidh (talk) 17:12, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Declined I looked at the wrong diffs, this falls under WP:3RRNO #7. Aoidh (talk) 17:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Jimmybingus reported by User:RowanJ LP (Result: Blocked 24 hours)

    Page: Johnny Somali (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: Jimmybingus (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. [10]
    2. [11]
    3. [12]
    4. [13]



    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [14]

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [15] User refused to resolve this through the talk page.

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [16]

    Comments:

    User continually refuses to compromise and has been warned for his behavior with edit warring.[17] User also attempts to add unreliable and uncredible sources (Reddit, TikTok, YouTube, Twitter) and uses them to edit war in the Johnny Somali article. After looking at his contributions it seems that the whole purpose of this account was just to be created to change the ethnicity of the article.[18]

    • Both editors blocked – for a period of 24 hours Aoidh (talk) 17:12, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Blocked – for a period of 24 hours, RowanJ LP's edits fall under WP:3RRNO #7, but Jimmybingus did break 3RR. - Aoidh (talk) 17:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Skibidi36 reported by User:Shadow311 (Result: Blocked 72 hours)

    Page: Ail al-Kahiay Campaign (1798) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: Skibidi36 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to: Special:diff/1217411798

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 18:55, 10 April 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision again. I can keep going for a long time."
    2. 11:28, 10 April 2024 (UTC) "This was a clear saudi victory. Undoung revision again."
    3. 16:52, 9 April 2024 (UTC) "Undoing revision again."
    4. 16:48, 9 April 2024 (UTC) "Undoing revision again."
    5. 16:46, 9 April 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision."

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 1st warning issued
    2. 2nd warning issued
    3. 18:56, 10 April 2024 (UTC) "Complete MAT action (RW 16.1)"

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    User has ignored multiple warnings on their talk page. They received their first warning for edit warring at 16:47, 9 April 2024 (UTC). Shadow311 (talk) 19:02, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    It seems the user also was edit warring on List of wars involving Saudi Arabia yesterday too. Shadow311 (talk) 19:18, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Blocked – for a period of 72 hours Daniel Case (talk) 19:21, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Max19582 reported by User:Brat Forelli (Result: Declined)

    Page: Civic Platform (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: Max19582 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to: [19]

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 17:34, 10 April 2024‎ (UTC) "Undid revision 1218259691 by Helper201 (talk), please get the consensus yourself as both the policies i provided are currently against what you're doing."
    2. 17:29, 10 April 2024‎ (UTC) "Undid revision 1218258819 by Helper201 (talk) that's what neither of the policy says, with your edit the word "center" is inconsistent with the rest."
    3. 17:20, 10 April 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1218240347 by Helper201 (talk), MOS:ARTCOM, the article should be written in one variety consistently; "centre" is not a valid spelling in American English which is used per MOS:RETAIN."
    4. 13:04, 9 April 2024 (UTC) "Undid revision 1217931734 by Helper201 (talk) both main text and infobox are in american english per MOS:RETAIN."


    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Both users tried to solve the dispute through a user talk page, but started the reverts again - [20]

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [21]

    Comments:

    • Brat Forelli, I'm puzzled. This looks like a truly lame edit war between Max19582 and Helper201 about the spelling of a word, center or centre. Both users have violated WP:3RR. Why did you report only one of them?--Bbb23 (talk) 22:59, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Right, probably should have reported both. I just saw that the user I did report seems to have started it. Brat Forelli🦊 02:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Brat Forelli: It was not my intent to edit war (the fourth edit you linked seems to have been outside the 24-hour window, but I agree the situation could have been handled better) and I dropped from reverting the article as soon as I saw an edit war emerge. No reverts have been made to the article (by neither me nor the other user involved) in the past 22 hours. While I do not agree with the user's changes, I don't think advocating for reverting such a minor dispute is worth time of either of us, so on my part I won't be contributing the article anymore regarding this particular matter. Max19582 (talk) 15:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Declined per above, as user's decision to withdraw from editing the article means, as he says, there is no continuing issue here. Daniel Case (talk) 19:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Exteahans71 reported by User:Lizthegrey (Result: Indefinitely blocked)

    Page: Kelly Cooney Cilella (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: Exteahans71 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 01:01, 11 April 2024 (UTC) "This has just enough detail, i think this is good enough., also I fixed captiolziation errors."
    2. 00:47, 11 April 2024 (UTC) "Just added additional source for this, in order to make sense. Found another article."
    3. 00:27, 11 April 2024 (UTC) ""

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 22:26, 3 April 2024 (UTC) "/* April 2024 */ You have been blocked from editing for violation of the three-revert rule on Ruby Gillman, Teenage Kraken."
    2. 21:11, 3 April 2024 (UTC) "/* April 2024 */ Final warning notice on Ruby Gillman, Teenage Kraken."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/3RRArchive480#User:Exteahans71 reported by User:Lizthegrey (Result: Blocked one week) lizthegrey (talk) 01:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:RowanJ_LP reported by User:Aurelius5150 (Result: Reporter indefinitely blocked)

    Page: Johnny Somali (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: RowanJ_LP (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. [22]
    2. [23]
    3. [24]
    4. [25]


    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [diff]

    Comments:
    User RowanJ LP, constantly reverting and removing whole sections, trying to hide and distort information, using little to no evidence which are based on "speculative rumors" and removing evidence that are first-hand accounts of the personality Johnny Somali declaring the information for the audience. Making multiple edits removing information within 24 hours --Aurelius5150 (talk) 04:38, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    I've already been over this with another admin, the reverts fall under WP:3RRNO #7 RowanJ LP (talk) 04:41, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    • Reporter indefinitely blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 12:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Cossde reported by User:Petextrodon (Result: Stale)

    Page: Sexual violence against Tamils in Sri Lanka (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    Page: List of attacks on civilians attributed to Sri Lankan government forces (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: Cossde (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. [26]
    2. [27]
    3. [28]
    4. [29]
    5. [30]

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. [31]
    2. [32]
    3. [33]
    4. [34]
    5. [35]



    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [36] [37] [38]

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [39] [40]

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [41]

    Comments: This user was reported recently on here by another user for edit warring on two pages by gaming the system. Since no violation was found, they've been only emboldened to continue their edit warring which has now escalated to the point of vandalism, with cited content being removed. This to me appears to be clear case of gaming the system as defined above: "Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation." Without admin intervention, I fear this issue will continue indefinitely. --- Petextrodon (talk) 04:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    As I have mentioned in the other report, both users Petextrodon and Oz346 have been engaging in WP:BATTLE to push content without building consensus in the talk page. Due to the disruptive editing by these uses I have request page protection [42], [43] and ARC. Cossde (talk) Cossde (talk) 06:21, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    information Note: The closing administrator may be interested in the result of Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case § Sri Lanka motion, independently of how this specific request here is closed. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:13, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Declined The case seems stale as talk page discussion continues while edit warring does not, but since interactions between these two editors were a not-inconsiderable part of getting Sri Lanka designated as a contentious topic, it has not been in vain. Daniel Case (talk) 18:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Daniel Case Could you please clarify what "gaming the system" means here since I could have misunderstood it? The edit warring stopped when this user was reported last time too and they went back to it which I fear will happen again. Does this mean more than 3 reverts are permitted as long as they are outside the 24-hour period and don't happen while an AN3 report is pending? --- Petextrodon (talk) 19:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Nitekuzee reported by User:Merzostin (Result: Stale)

    Page: Djong (ship) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: Nitekuzee (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. [44]
    2. [45]
    3. [46]
    4. [47]
    5. [48]
    6. [49]
    7. [50]
    8. [51]
    9. [52]
    10. [53]
    11. [54]
    12. [55]
    13. [56]

    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: Talk:Djong (ship)#Zhou Qufei, Lingwai Daida

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [diff]

    Comments:
    Disagreement about removing problematic misinformation quote WP:LIE, which deliberately used a quote out of context to mislead readers. It also tried to fabricate real history by passing off description of Chinese ships to describe the Javanese ships.

    I have removed the quote, but was then reverted by user Nitekuzee. This quote was pretty famous and used in many publication to describe Chinese ships so i have provided multiple evidences to show that it was indeed quote of Chinese ships, but Nitekuzee continue to deny it and refuse to reply with logic (as seen from his nonsensical replies on the talk page) while still didn't provide a single credible evidence on how he think it could be Javanese ships and also continue to use the distorted quote rather than the real quote from the real source. (p.s i'm aware that i have made 4 reverts, because i thought the removal of template and misinformation by using real source were obvious vandalism and can be reverted as many times, now i know i was mistaken) Merzostin (talk) 08:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)}}[reply]

    • Stale. Bbb23 (talk) 12:48, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      can i ask what does this mean? Merzostin (talk) 13:45, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      It means that the edit-warring occurred too long ago, in this case two days ago.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      so if someone didn't report edit warring fast enough, it's fine for them to do the edits warring? what about the revert? should it be reverted to the original, i'm kinda confused Merzostin (talk) 14:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Generally, blocks are intended to prevent ongoing disruption. If the disruption has seemingly stopped, sanctions are no longer necessary. If you believe that there is a persistent problem with the user's conduct, then you can take them to WP:ANI. I express no opinion as to the merits of such a complaint, though.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      The User in question, I believe DID cease disruptive editing on the article after I advised on his/her talk page that continuation would lead to a block. Collaboration is the cornerstone of the project. Regards,   Aloha27  talk  19:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Lotsofsalt reported by User:M.Bitton (Result: Blocked two weeks)

    Page: Jewish exodus from the Muslim world (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: Lotsofsalt (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 05:13, 11 April 2024 (UTC) ""
    2. 02:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC) "See talkpage"

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    After their block expired, they are once again edit warring on the same article. They also violated 1RR in full knowledge of the rule (as specified on their talk page). M.Bitton (talk) 11:28, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    • Blocked – for a period of two weeks. Bbb23 (talk) 12:45, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:2600:1002:B03E:1C3B:0:31:3603:5001 reported by User:Asparagusus (Result: /64 blocked for two weeks)

    Page: Vivienne Medrano (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: 2600:1002:B03E:1C3B:0:31:3603:5001 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 13:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC) ""
    2. 13:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC) ""
    3. 12:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC) ""

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 13:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material on Vivienne Medrano."
    2. 13:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

    1. 13:04, 11 April 2024 (UTC) on User talk:2600:1002:B03E:1C3B:0:31:3603:5001 "Message re. Vivienne Medrano (HG) (3.4.12)"

    Comments: Adding BLP violations sourced to Tumblr and YouTube. —asparagusus (interaction) sprouts! 13:20, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Blocked – for a period of two weeks Including the whole /64. Daniel Case (talk) 19:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:ArezKader reported by User:WikiDan61 (Result: Partially blocked 2 weeks)

    Page: Christianity in Iraq (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: ArezKader (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to: Here, user blanked a section of cited text, calling it "supported by no citation" even though it was clearly supported by citation.

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. restored preferred version once (no meaningful summary)
    2. .. twice (no meaningful summary)
    3. .. thrice (still no meaningful summary)
    4. .. and once more for good measure



    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: ArezKeder opened a discussion (at my urging) at This section is pure garbage. AzerKeder has ignored attempts to reach WP:CONSENSUS, instead ramming their facts down Wikipedia's throats.

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [57]

    Comments:

    • Partially blocked – for a period of 2 weeks ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:07, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:83.10.178.213 reported by User:MPFitz1968 (Result: Already blocked)

    Page: Guts (Olivia Rodrigo album) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: 83.10.178.213 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 01:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Change of music genres"
    2. 01:02, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Change of music genres"
    3. 23:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC) "Genre music change"
    4. 22:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC) "Change of music genre"

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 01:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Guts (Olivia Rodrigo album)."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:


    Comments:

    Will also include their initial edit under a different IP address, as 83.10.248.79 [58] - undoubtedly the same person. MPFitz1968 (talk) 01:24, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:UnbiasedSN reported by User:نعم البدل (Result: Page protected)

    Page: Punjabi language (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported: UnbiasedSN (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. [59]
    2. [60]
    3. [61]
    4. [62]

    Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]

    Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [63]

    Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [64]

    Comments: The user has an issue with treating Wikipedia as WP:Battleground and does not bother to open a discussion on talk pages and instead resort to reverts.

    Would like to state user نعم البدل is engaged in the same behavior, and reverted my edit first without even reading the source which is factually wrong in this case. Link is to a severely outdated government website that makes no mention of his claim. I also warned them about their behavior first. This is just a case of gotcha first. He also proceeds to curse and get aggressive when confronted otherwise. The user has a pending disruptive editing incident on the Administration Board. UnbiasedSN (talk) 06:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    User:92.184.104.3 reported by User:S0091 (Result: )

    Page: Russ Cook (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

    User being reported: 92.184.104.3 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Previous version reverted to:

    Diffs of the user's reverts:

    1. 18:44, 12 April 2024 (UTC) ""
    2. 18:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Corrected a false statement again"
    3. Consecutive edits made from 18:39, 12 April 2024 (UTC) to 18:42, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
      1. 18:39, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Corrected a false claim"
      2. 18:42, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "/* Running the length of Africa */Corrected a false statement again"
    4. Consecutive edits made from 17:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC) to 18:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
      1. 17:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Added precision"
      2. 18:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Corrected a false statement"
    5. Consecutive edits made from 17:52, 12 April 2024 (UTC) to 17:56, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
      1. 17:52, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Again I corrected a claim being branded as a fact"
      2. 17:53, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Again corrected a false statement"
      3. 17:56, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Corrected false statements"
    6. Consecutive edits made from 17:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC) to 17:34, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
      1. 17:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Corrected a false statement"
      2. 17:32, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "There is no definition of “entire” or “full” length of Africa. The science of geography defines the “length” of teh continent (which is measured at 8000km) but there is no such distinction as “entire” or “full”. A length. Please acknowledge this. Thanks"
      3. 17:34, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Again I am correcting a claim branded as a fact. For a record to be established, it has to be awarded by the institution or governing body of that discipline. Records cannot be self-awarded - and if they are, they do not belong to Wikipedia"
    7. 16:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Corrected another instance where a claim was branded as a fact"
    8. Consecutive edits made from 16:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC) to 16:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
      1. 16:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "I corrected earlier. Then it was erased. I wrote the truth again, which is that Mr Cook is not the first and doesnt hold any record (yet) as regards his Africa run."
      2. 16:06, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Wrote back what had been erased earlier by a third user"
      3. 16:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Corrected a fact that was wrong"

    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:

    1. 17:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "General note: Unconstructive editing on Russ Cook."
    2. 17:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Caution: Unconstructive editing on Project Africa."
    3. 18:47, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring."

    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:

    1. 18:19, 12 April 2024 (UTC) "/* A claim is not a fact */ Reply"

    Comments:

    IP did finally open a discussion on the talk page but still repeatedly restored to their preferred version rather than letting the discussion proceed to gain consensus. I also tagged the article as disputed on their behalf as they may have valid argument but are going about it the wrong way. Suggest page blocking to allow them to participate on the talk page. S0091 (talk) 19:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    And another after I filed this report. S0091 (talk) 19:18, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&oldid=1218621267"