Declined. Our Samoans (the wrestling ones)-obsessed UAE editor. Not getting reverted much so I'm not worried. Daniel Case (talk) 19:26, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:50, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
This username matched "Used x instead of cks attempting to skip filter: long username without spaces. Violating string: noecksecutivesfunctioning" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 22:50, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
This username matched "Used i instead of l attempting to skip filter: l+o+l+o+l+. Violating string: joaoololol" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:50, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
This username matched "Used k instead of c attempting to skip filter: role account?. Violating string: niccenter" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 17:10, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Note on file Usernames containing this string are often role accounts - check if this is the case -- DQB (owner / report) 17:10, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Comment: Not a clear violation. I think I see where you are going with this, but unless you can show some evidence, it is a stretch to call it disruptive. You need more than this. -- Alexf(talk) 00:38, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Please discuss this with the user first, and consider opening a community discussion at Requests for comment/User names if they disagree with your concerns. I would tend to agree with Alexf; while more uncommon since a certain historical figure had that name, Adolf is still a given name for people. I would suggest discussing your concerns with the editor first, then bringing it for discussion if your concerns are unresolved. 331dot (talk) 08:15, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. "R" could indicate a person who in "consulting" and is not necessarily the name of an organization. They may be a paid editor, but that is not a username issue. 331dot (talk) 08:09, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
I've been around for a couple years now, and believe rollback would significantly assist me in patrolling. I believe I pass all requirements and have sufficient experience with patrolling and dealing with vandalism. NeoJadeTalk/Contribs 20:44, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Reason for requesting rollback rights
Hello, I would like to obtain rollback rights to fight against vandalism, spam and any other non-constructive modifications, I know very well how to differentiate between a beginner user who simply makes a mistake, and a person who makes bad modifications voluntarily. Also I know how to use the Twinkle tool to leave warnings of cancellation of modifications on the discussion page of the users concerned. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 21:15, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Not done sorry, but you have only had an account for about a week. That is far too soon to apply for permissions. Please get some more experience first. Elli (talk | contribs) 02:26, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Hello @Elli. I understand that we don't give roles like that, on the other hand I don't really understand what seniority has to do with it, any sane person knows the difference between pure vandalism and a bad, unintentional modification, it's quite easy to spot what needs to be put back or not. See my posts on Noni Madueke, S-segment and on the discussions of the vandals concerned. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 09:53, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Challenging this denial will not result in Elli changing his mind, it reaffirms that you are not ready. You are a very, very new editor and permissions are given as a sign of trust that they won't be misused. You haven't been active long enough for this trust to exist. Come back after a few months of solid editing. LizRead!Talk! 02:27, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
I actively patrol Recent Changes reverting vandalism and incorrect good faith edits using Twinkle. For every revert, I leave a notice to inform the editors why their edit is reverted. I would like to use a more advanced tool to make this easier. Ednabrenze (talk) 09:32, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBottalk 09:40, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Already done (automated response) by Malinaccier. — MusikBottalk 20:00, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Account creator
Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"