User talk:Melbourne3163/Archive 4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

Hello, Melbourne3163! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Arctic Kangaroo 13:07, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

The Signpost: 07 August 2013


Melbourne Star has been moved back per a request at WP:RM/TR

Hello Melbourne3163. I noticed your name in the move log for this article. The page has now been moved back to Melbourne Star per a request at WP:RM/TR as a 'revert of undiscussed move.' If you still think the page belongs at Melbourne Star Observation Wheel use a {{Requested move}} template to open a move discussion on the talk page. Then, after seven days, consensus will decide the best title. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 20:37, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi. I requested the revert. I have explained why at Talk:Melbourne Star#Article name. Thanks... 27.55.199.195 (talk) 21:15, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your message. I will use a Requested move template and add my reasons to the discussion. Cheers Melbourne3163 (talk) 22:29, 30 August 2013 (UTC)


Speedy delete tagging

Hi, you tagged Mooroolbark junior soccer club for speedy deletion. You did a couple of things wrong. First, don't sign the tag. Just add only the template, e.g. {{db-G7}}, to the article. Second, you should notify the creator. You added the notification template to the article talk page. If you have any questions, please let me know.--Bbb23 (talk) 10:43, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Many thanks for your comments, my first time for this type of action. I did follow a similar example but made the errors you have pointed out. I'll learn from that. Thanks again. Melbourne3163 (talk) 11:19, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Essendon/AFL issue

Thanks again for the heads-up. I have just found an ABC article about the refutation and will make the revision now.--Soulparadox (talk) 14:04, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Frank McGuire

No worries, I thought it was probably just a typo! Thanks for expanding the article, I have been meaning to do that for a while but have neglected it. --Canley (talk) 05:25, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

helpful script

Hello Melbourne. I saw a question on the AIV talk page about seeing what ended up happening in regards to an IP report that has since been removed. As you probably have warned the person in most cases before reporting, there is a script that can easily help you see if it was blocked yet.

importScript('User:NuclearWarfare/Mark-blocked script.js')

This helpful script if added to your moonbook's .js will show all blocked editors with a strikeout through their username or IP address (both on the watch list and signatures). I find it highly helpful and maybe you might too. Take care Calmer Waters 05:46, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Re the Channel Seven offending paragraph :)

You suggested that the paragraph being more than a little unkind to Channel Seven should be removed in its entirety, and I'll go along with that. Heck, all the comments may in fact be absolutely correct for all I know, but they're not substantiated in any way by whoever the original writer was.

Best wishes ... off to do it now :) 178.78.76.100 (talk) 08:18, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Justin Smith (radio) was accepted

Justin Smith (radio), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SarahStierch (talk) 00:42, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Melbourne3163/Archive 4. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by I, JethroBT drop me a line 18:43, 4 October 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Your sandbox

I have "broken" the redirect on your sandbox so that you can easily add the {{db-user}} tag for it to be deleted. Then you will get a fresh sandbox to begin your next article. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:20, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your assistance. I was getting rather confused about how to effectively fix this situation, before you took that action. Cheers. Melbourne3163 (talk) 15:45, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 November 2013

"Edit summary": November 27, 2013

No worries. Thanks for the tip. Stt13

You're welcome. Melbourne3163 (talk) 11:50, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Melbourne3163/Archive 4. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Howicus (Did I mess up?) 18:17, 29 November 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

The Signpost: 04 December 2013

The Signpost: 11 December 2013

Melbourne Star

Hi. I think you left the wrong message on my talk page (it doesn't match your edit summary). If so, please could you remove it? Thanks. Edit summary was "ce" which means "copy-edit". 82.132.224.153 (talk) 11:15, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

I think you may be referring to my first message? I amended it (prior to your message) to better reflect what I am referring to. Blanking a whole section really requires a more appropriate edit summary than 'ce' or copy/edit, even if only as a courtesy to a fellow editor, in the case me. Cheers. Melbourne3163 (talk) 11:26, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
I didn't blank the section, I moved it. Diff. For missing/bad summaries, check out Template:Uw-editsummary and Template:Uw-wrongsummary. Hope this helps. 82.132.224.153 (talk) 11:36, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. I have removed my comments/queries on your talk page. I did not pick up that you moved my edit. Aopologies. I am wondering why you are editing as 82.132.224.153, a new editor who only started today, when you are clearly an experienced editor, if you don't mind me asking? Melbourne3163 (talk) 11:53, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Absolutely no problem. I've been editing since 2005, but I've never had an account.
What do you think is the best way to position the reopening? How about a ===Reopening=== heading, so that it's the final sub-section of the ==Reconstruction== section? I realise it will follow the 2013 subsection, but I don't think that will cause any confusion, especially if the section begins something like "The wheel finally reopened on 24 December 2013" (ie include the year). 82.132.224.153 (talk) 13:18, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay in replying. I like the idea of a Reopening section and the placement you propose. Cheers. Melbourne3163 (talk) 21:15, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Josh Gibson (footballer) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • 69 overall) for Hawthorn's second and third round draft picks (#25 and #41 overall).

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:24, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 December 2013

The Signpost: 25 December 2013

Josh Earl

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Josh Earl, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.joshearl.com.au/bio/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 22:37, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Please refer to my response below. Many thanks. Melbourne3163 (talk) 23:12, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Josh Earl

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Josh Earl requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.joshearl.com.au/bio/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thebestofall007 (talk) 22:42, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your message. I have replied via the contest button and I hope my reasons and the current version of the page are within policy. I won't repeat here what I have said in my response, I would just ask that you read it and consider it; I am a very hard-working, loyal and devoted editor. Cheers. Melbourne3163 (talk) 23:10, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

I removed the deletion template

I do see the changes you made to Josh Earl, as you appear to have re done it in your own words from what I see in the duplication detector tool, and I removed the deletion template. Copying and pasting info from another website is considered copyright infringement obviously, and even if you provide your own words, just make sure to cite the source much like you would if you were writing a research paper for a college class for example. This also provides verifiability so readers can see that the info comes from a valid source and isn't just made up. I hope this clears things up. Thebestofall007 (talk) 01:24, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Many thanks for your guidance and assistance. I am glad it is now resolved. Regards. Melbourne3163 (talk) 02:12, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

External links

While an external link to the subject is appropriate, Wikipedia is not a link wall to give direct access to EVERY page vaguely related to the subject. Perhaps one of the others is more appropriate, but it should be the one most directly related to giving the most encyclopedic information about the subject as a person of note, and not the one that provides the most direct commercial venue. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:04, 3 January 2014 (UTC) -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:04, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Ok, I understand much better now. Thank you for your most helpful comments. Cheers. Melbourne3163 (talk) 21:09, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 January 2014

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Melbourne3163/Archive 4. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Flat Out let's discuss it 10:09, 4 January 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

The Signpost: 08 January 2014

Arching old Talk page

/Archive 3

Welcome

Hello, Melbourne3163! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Arctic Kangaroo 13:07, 1 May 2013 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

The Signpost: 07 August 2013


Melbourne Star has been moved back per a request at WP:RM/TR

Hello Melbourne3163. I noticed your name in the move log for this article. The page has now been moved back to Melbourne Star per a request at WP:RM/TR as a 'revert of undiscussed move.' If you still think the page belongs at Melbourne Star Observation Wheel use a {{Requested move}} template to open a move discussion on the talk page. Then, after seven days, consensus will decide the best title. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 20:37, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi. I requested the revert. I have explained why at Talk:Melbourne Star#Article name. Thanks... 27.55.199.195 (talk) 21:15, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your message. I will use a Requested move template and add my reasons to the discussion. Cheers Melbourne3163 (talk) 22:29, 30 August 2013 (UTC)


Speedy delete tagging

Hi, you tagged Mooroolbark junior soccer club for speedy deletion. You did a couple of things wrong. First, don't sign the tag. Just add only the template, e.g. {{db-G7}}, to the article. Second, you should notify the creator. You added the notification template to the article talk page. If you have any questions, please let me know.--Bbb23 (talk) 10:43, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Many thanks for your comments, my first time for this type of action. I did follow a similar example but made the errors you have pointed out. I'll learn from that. Thanks again. Melbourne3163 (talk) 11:19, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Essendon/AFL issue

Thanks again for the heads-up. I have just found an ABC article about the refutation and will make the revision now.--Soulparadox (talk) 14:04, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Frank McGuire

No worries, I thought it was probably just a typo! Thanks for expanding the article, I have been meaning to do that for a while but have neglected it. --Canley (talk) 05:25, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

helpful script

Hello Melbourne. I saw a question on the AIV talk page about seeing what ended up happening in regards to an IP report that has since been removed. As you probably have warned the person in most cases before reporting, there is a script that can easily help you see if it was blocked yet.

importScript('User:NuclearWarfare/Mark-blocked script.js')

This helpful script if added to your moonbook's .js will show all blocked editors with a strikeout through their username or IP address (both on the watch list and signatures). I find it highly helpful and maybe you might too. Take care Calmer Waters 05:46, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Re the Channel Seven offending paragraph :)

You suggested that the paragraph being more than a little unkind to Channel Seven should be removed in its entirety, and I'll go along with that. Heck, all the comments may in fact be absolutely correct for all I know, but they're not substantiated in any way by whoever the original writer was.

Best wishes ... off to do it now :) 178.78.76.100 (talk) 08:18, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Justin Smith (radio) was accepted

Justin Smith (radio), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SarahStierch (talk) 00:42, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Melbourne3163/Archive 4. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by I, JethroBT drop me a line 18:43, 4 October 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Your sandbox

I have "broken" the redirect on your sandbox so that you can easily add the {{db-user}} tag for it to be deleted. Then you will get a fresh sandbox to begin your next article. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:20, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your assistance. I was getting rather confused about how to effectively fix this situation, before you took that action. Cheers. Melbourne3163 (talk) 15:45, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 November 2013

"Edit summary": November 27, 2013

No worries. Thanks for the tip. Stt13

You're welcome. Melbourne3163 (talk) 11:50, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Melbourne3163/Archive 4. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Howicus (Did I mess up?) 18:17, 29 November 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

The Signpost: 04 December 2013

The Signpost: 11 December 2013

Melbourne Star

Hi. I think you left the wrong message on my talk page (it doesn't match your edit summary). If so, please could you remove it? Thanks. Edit summary was "ce" which means "copy-edit". 82.132.224.153 (talk) 11:15, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

I think you may be referring to my first message? I amended it (prior to your message) to better reflect what I am referring to. Blanking a whole section really requires a more appropriate edit summary than 'ce' or copy/edit, even if only as a courtesy to a fellow editor, in the case me. Cheers. Melbourne3163 (talk) 11:26, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
I didn't blank the section, I moved it. Diff. For missing/bad summaries, check out Template:Uw-editsummary and Template:Uw-wrongsummary. Hope this helps. 82.132.224.153 (talk) 11:36, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. I have removed my comments/queries on your talk page. I did not pick up that you moved my edit. Aopologies. I am wondering why you are editing as 82.132.224.153, a new editor who only started today, when you are clearly an experienced editor, if you don't mind me asking? Melbourne3163 (talk) 11:53, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Absolutely no problem. I've been editing since 2005, but I've never had an account.
What do you think is the best way to position the reopening? How about a ===Reopening=== heading, so that it's the final sub-section of the ==Reconstruction== section? I realise it will follow the 2013 subsection, but I don't think that will cause any confusion, especially if the section begins something like "The wheel finally reopened on 24 December 2013" (ie include the year). 82.132.224.153 (talk) 13:18, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay in replying. I like the idea of a Reopening section and the placement you propose. Cheers. Melbourne3163 (talk) 21:15, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Josh Gibson (footballer) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • 69 overall) for Hawthorn's second and third round draft picks (#25 and #41 overall).

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:24, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 December 2013

The Signpost: 25 December 2013

Josh Earl

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Josh Earl, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.joshearl.com.au/bio/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 22:37, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Please refer to my response below. Many thanks. Melbourne3163 (talk) 23:12, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Josh Earl

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Josh Earl requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.joshearl.com.au/bio/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Thebestofall007 (talk) 22:42, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your message. I have replied via the contest button and I hope my reasons and the current version of the page are within policy. I won't repeat here what I have said in my response, I would just ask that you read it and consider it; I am a very hard-working, loyal and devoted editor. Cheers. Melbourne3163 (talk) 23:10, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

I removed the deletion template

I do see the changes you made to Josh Earl, as you appear to have re done it in your own words from what I see in the duplication detector tool, and I removed the deletion template. Copying and pasting info from another website is considered copyright infringement obviously, and even if you provide your own words, just make sure to cite the source much like you would if you were writing a research paper for a college class for example. This also provides verifiability so readers can see that the info comes from a valid source and isn't just made up. I hope this clears things up. Thebestofall007 (talk) 01:24, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Many thanks for your guidance and assistance. I am glad it is now resolved. Regards. Melbourne3163 (talk) 02:12, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

External links

While an external link to the subject is appropriate, Wikipedia is not a link wall to give direct access to EVERY page vaguely related to the subject. Perhaps one of the others is more appropriate, but it should be the one most directly related to giving the most encyclopedic information about the subject as a person of note, and not the one that provides the most direct commercial venue. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:04, 3 January 2014 (UTC) -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 21:04, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Ok, I understand much better now. Thank you for your most helpful comments. Cheers. Melbourne3163 (talk) 21:09, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 January 2014

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Melbourne3163/Archive 4. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Flat Out let's discuss it 10:09, 4 January 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jake King may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • '''Jake King''' (born 26 March 1984) is an [[Australian rules football]]er for the [[Richmond Football Club] in the [[Australian Football League]] (AFL).

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:13, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 4BC may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • * Afternoons with Michael Price and Kim Mothershaw (fill-in presenter) 12pm-3pm weekdays)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:56, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 January 2014

The Signpost: 22 January 2014

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

The Signpost: 29 January 2014

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Calisthenics (Australia) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • effective-1-January-20141.pdf ACF Rules 2014] ''Australian Calisthenic Federation'' National Rules]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:41, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Melbourne3163/Archive 4. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by PrimeHunter (talk) 23:51, 11 February 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

The Signpost: 12 February 2014

The Signpost: 19 February 2014

The Signpost: 26 February 2014

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Swisse Wellness concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Swisse Wellness, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:08, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your message. I requested deletion of the draft as I do not wish to pursue publication. The draft has now been deleted. Cheers. Melbourne3163 (talk) 21:54, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 May 2015

The Signpost: 13 May 2015

The Signpost: 20 May 2015

The Signpost: 27 May 2015

The Signpost: 03 June 2015

The Signpost: 10 June 2015

The Signpost: 17 June 2015

The Signpost: 24 June 2015

The Signpost: 01 July 2015

The Signpost: 08 July 2015

The Signpost: 15 July 2015

The Signpost: 22 July 2015

The Signpost: 29 July 2015

The Signpost: 05 August 2015

The Signpost: 12 August 2015

The Signpost: 19 August 2015

The Signpost: 26 August 2015

The Signpost: 02 September 2015

The Signpost: 09 September 2015

The Signpost: 16 September 2015

The Signpost: 23 September 2015

The Signpost: 30 September 2015

The Signpost: 07 October 2015

The Signpost: 14 October 2015

The Signpost: 21 October 2015

The Signpost: 28 October 2015

The Signpost: 04 November 2015

The Signpost: 11 November 2015

The Signpost: 18 November 2015

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 November 2015

The Signpost: 02 December 2015

The Signpost: 09 December 2015

The Signpost: 16 December 2015

The Signpost: 30 December 2015

The Signpost: 06 January 2016

The Signpost: 13 January 2016

The Signpost: 20 January 2016

The Signpost: 27 January 2016

The Signpost: 03 February 2016

The Signpost: 10 February 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:29, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 February 2016

The Signpost: 24 February 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:04, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 March 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:01, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 March 2016

The Signpost: 16 March 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 March 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:25, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 April 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 April 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 April 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:42, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 May 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:09, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 May 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 May 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 June 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:13, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 June 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 July 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:47, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 July 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 August 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:33, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 August 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 September 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:44, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 September 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:21, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 October 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:51, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Melbourne3163. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:06, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 December 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:04, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 January 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:39, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 February 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:46, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Fair Use in Australia discussion

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

The Signpost: 9 June 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:18, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 June 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:32, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 July 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 5 August 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 September 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:45, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 September 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 October 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:36, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 November 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Melbourne3163. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 December 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:28, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 January 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:27, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 5 February 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:13, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 February 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:12, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:49, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 April 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:16, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 June 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 July 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:51, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:03, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 October 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Melbourne3163/Archive_4&oldid=1143163480"