User talk:Solarra/Archive 1
WelcomeWelcome... Hello, Solarra, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place GreaserI've reverted your edit on the Greaser disambiguation page because if you read the article that Greaser (derogatory) points you to, you'll see that the article does refer to it as a derogatory term for Mexicans and is referenced. I'm not saying it's correct but the disambiguation must accurately reflect the page it links to. NtheP (talk) 19:55, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Places you can helpCheck here for starters. Thanks for your willingness to help! NawlinWiki (talk) 16:31, 1 October 2010 (UTC) Special:Tags would also be another place to search for vandalism, this page filters possible vandalism from Special:RecentChanges. SwisterTwister talk 21:49, 11 April 2012 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Captain Picard Chair.jpg Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:57, 10 May 2012 (UTC)  You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. BarnstarThanks very much! I'm having a bit of an igloo day today, glad to know I'm doing it right. Yunshui 雲水 11:54, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
If you have a few moments...I've been trying for a while to find additional information to bolster the article on Chikaraishi (it's become something of a pet project of mine, despite being basically about some rather uninspiring rocks). However, I'm severely hampered by my limited (read: all but non-existent) comprehension of Japanese, asince the majority of sources are liable to be in that language. I note that you're a native speaker, and I wondered if you might be willing to lend a hand in locating further sources and information. The article is currently up for GA review, so anything that can be done to improve it would be greatly appreciated. Domo arigato! Yunshui 雲水 12:54, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Nothing better to dothan edit war an IP's own talk page? 75.67.226.189 (talk) 16:15, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
Greetings!Hiya! Make sure you remove [vandalism] warnings that you accidentally place on user pages - otherwise we might scare away newcomers! We all make mistakes, so no worries. Cheers! :-) Thorncrag 17:26, 8 June 2012 (UTC) Re:Barnstar1.) Thank you for the barnstar :D! 2.) no problem — I'm happy to help with anything — let me know if you need anymore help ^_^ KATANAGOD (talk) 22:53, 8 June 2012 (UTC) You recently reverted an edit of mine to redirect Macrochelodina kuchlingi to Chelodina rugosa. Your reason was that it should be discussed first on the Talk:Macrochelodina_kuchlingi page. Please note this was done, also the name already has been redirected under another name Chelodina kuchlingi I was just completing this process. The species was synonymised with Chelodina rugosa in 2010, reiterated in 2011. Note that the species is listed as a synonym of Chelodina rugosa in the taxobox. I do believe this revert was unwarranted and we have more than demonstrated that this page should not exist. Cheers, Faendalimas talk 00:18, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
Your request for rollback Hi Solarra. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! v/r - TP 02:25, 9 June 2012 (UTC) I dont like being accused of vandalism, when I was infact reverting it.Seriously, point how a vandalized ANY page, because I didnt. I was working AGAINST the vandals. JonnyBonesJones (talk) 02:27, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Bahrani peopleListen, Ashrf1979 added "Bet Qatraye", an area not inhabited by Bahranis into the article so I removed it. He also removed a sourced section about the Baharna today. Ilikecod (talk) 03:49, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Go on this website: is.gd/5D1c5P — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ilikecod (talk • contribs) 03:59, 9 June 2012 (UTC) Programmable logic controllerYou know, removing content is not really considered vandalism as it might have a constructive use such as spam removal. Unfortunately, the IP is not leaving an edit summary which while annoying is not really vandalism either. You should use a {{subst:uw-delete1|Programmable logic controller}} template rather than the vandalism template. Check out WP:NOTVAND Thanks for your vandalism control! Jim1138 (talk) 05:09, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Please read WP:BLANKING... Users are allowed to remove content from their own talk pages, no matter how disruptive it may seem. Please do not give vandalism warnings for this in the future. -RunningOnBrains(talk) 05:40, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Hexane in Textured vegetable proteinHi, you have removed my edit. Current text is implying that hexane in TVP is dangerous.
But the source is saying that even 353,000 veggie burgers a day wouldn't give toxic levels of hexane. This is at least [failed verification]. Donestock1 (talk) 09:13, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Re: Distinguished Service MedalHow was the edit not constructive? This is the listed source: http://www.mrc.org/media-reality-check/touting-military-misdeeds-hiding-heroes-0#Donald R. Hollenbaugh. This is a quote from the article: "They had taken over two houses in front of American lines when they were attacked by more than 300 enemy fighters.", the wiki article meanwhile said "3,000 enemies". Seems like a serious misrepresentation to me. --86.11.162.43 (talk) 09:58, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Did you even check before reverting? 109.155.173.180 (talk) 10:50, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Rabbit punchYou last edit of the page "Rabbit punch" didn't erase vandalism, it restored it. According to the page now, it is a harmless blow legal in many mode of professional fighting, when precisely the opposite is true. I would undo your reversion myself, but vandal-bots seem to be disrupting this simple process all over the site.76.181.46.246 (talk) 15:14, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
Your warningI did give an explanation in the summary on why I removed the content from Moose Murders here. That whole section was not notable, for one of the links didn't work. The other "revival" links were to a brief mention in a foreign language news site. And went on to talk about some non-notable conceptual artist where the text said it was published in "articles in major newspapers", but when you click on the links, it is the same article linked to in the first section, and the Spanish site is repeating the same on its site from that article in the NYT. 74.83.35.137 (talk) 22:35, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
fonjer accountI registted this account back to when my son-Fonjer was born in 2008. now I don't want this info to be on web, can you please delete this account. regards, Lei — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.107.159.70 (talk) 23:18, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
fonjer accountHi Solarra, thanks for delete this account, notice it's not in Wiki any more. however it still appears on Google snapshot, it will be perfect if you can let Google know to delete these in future. much appreciated. with best regards, Lei — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.107.159.70 (talk) 23:38, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
75.185.211.64- stubborn little chap, ain't he. I'm a content-building, article-writing type editor so I don't know much about blocking. Maybe you could help. Tigerboy1966 23:55, 9 June 2012 (UTC) Speedy deletion request for User:FONJER declinedI've declined your request for speedy deletion for User:FONJER "at the request of the author". You aren't the author of User:FONJER. Regards Tonywalton Talk 00:18, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Union RagsI am just giving information and you are deleting my valuable information too.I am giving good information — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.185.211.64 (talk) 00:18, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Watch 'dem 'dar 3RRBe careful about reverting non-vandalism more then 3 times in and article in 24 hours. Removal of content may be considered a content dispute rather than vandalism. Check out wp:3RR. Real vandalism can be reverted more than 3 times WP:NOT3RR. (Note that abortion related articles have a 1RR limit) Though some admins seem to hate the constant reverts. Often best to wait until the vandal is blocked and just fix it then. You can open an extra window in huggle to save the page. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 00:42, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. If you click on the different links, you can see that the second one takes you to the bottom of the page where the 'dem 'dar is. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 01:10, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
=John Dillard You reverted my change of removing an external link. That link said it was going to a history of John Dillard but instead it was going on an online store. Do you mind removing the link? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.132.24.87 (talk) 03:41, 10 June 2012 (UTC) Please read it also calling constructive a vandalism is violation of WP:NPA.Also the edit that I removed was based on anti-semitic book and there was no consensus for it on the talk page.--Shrike (talk) 08:36, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
New Page PatrollingHi. I'm just letting you know that Hans Clemer did not have any references at all. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:16, 10 June 2012 (UTC) Please don'tSalam, I'm new in Wikipedia. Please don't report me because I still don't know the basics. Thanks Al-Mujahid Fi Sabil Allah (talk) 10:22, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Thank you Al-Mujahid Fi Sabil Allah (talk) 10:46, 10 June 2012 (UTC) New Page PatrollingHi. I'm just letting you know that GC box doesn't/didn't have any references at all. If you are having problems using Huggle, please consider patrolling manually orusing the more appropriate WP:Twinkle. Thanks. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:49, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
8realmsRedirect page 8realms is created under: Wikipedia:Redirects, "Likely alternative capitalizations". The page has been flagged for speedy deletion by you, as per "obvious advertising or promotional material", which is not possible as the commercial product itself is no longer merchantable and will become dormant after 1-July. For details of the topic itself, please have a look at 8Realms. Unless speedy deletion placed under 1.3 of [[wp::Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#Redirects|Redirects], the speedy deletion shall be void.GSPbeetle complains Vandalisms 11:08, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
I Iz Saweee<3
The same one ? lol I did as well , just getting some revenge on an old classmate >:D lol
Hi, I'm curious! - you delete vandalism at the above but you didn't issue a warning — why? Regards Denisarona (talk) 12:25, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi again, thanks — it's just that I don't use HG or similar and I thought maybe there was a particular reason. Again thanks for the quick response. Denisarona (talk) 12:33, 10 June 2012 (UTC) Żeby Polska...Where is " one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion"; Where is "specifically, it is a blatant copyright infringement". Liryc is copyright? So why another songs have liryc? Or delete liryc but not article...!!! --Swd (talk) 12:41, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Article edits — Mischa MaiskyHi Solarra - I recently made major edits to the article Mischa Maisky and since then, you have reverted them. I spent a large amount of time referencing and researching this topic and I feel that the undoing of my work was unjustified. Perhaps the removal of the image was necessary, but the rest of the editing that I completed was, I feel, excellent in regards to the prior nature of the article. I would appreciate an explanation as to why my work has been removed. Thanks, Fareseru — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fareseru (talk • contribs) 13:09, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks Solarra for the quick response, I hope to work with you once again in the future to improve this wonderful Wiki :-) ArchivingHi! Thanks for your last message on my talk page. Can you maybe please tell me how to archieve some messages on my talk page? Morgan Katarn (talk) 13:16, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
New Page PatrollingHi. I'm just letting you know that I have declined your CSD A7 on Pachar bageshwar. This criterion does not apply to settlements. If you feel the article should be deleted please consider PROD or AfD. Thanks. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:58, 10 June 2012 (UTC) My contibutions were deleted.Hello, a user by the name of Laurel Lodged has really annoyed me. I appreciate that Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia, but the user replaced relevant information i had with regard the page Naomh Abán Gaa. I find this unfair and, any information I have contributed to the page I believe I should have the right to call back as a result of this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AnFearCrua (talk • contribs) 16:10, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Your revert on Hungarian Working People's PartyI think that 190.22.192.169 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) was just tittying up some of his earlier work. With huggle, I look at the user who did the previous edit as well as the current edit. If they are the same editor, I will open the article in a browser to see what is going on. In this case, 190.22.192.169 added an info box leaving an edit summary then remove part of that box with the subsequent edit. I have not looked at it carefully, but if I had done the revert personally, would remove my comment on his talk page and the revert as well. I will leave it up to you. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 22:07, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
How is this "Vandalism"?I noticed you reverted by edits and left a warning on my talkpage using WP:GLOO. However, what I did was remove a list of gameplay items not encouraged per WP:GAMECRUFT. I even left a message detailing what I did. Please read: On WP:GAMECRUFT, under the subsection Inappropiate content, it specifically lists: Lists of gameplay items, weapons, or concepts. So, can you please explain how that is vandalism, because I think it clearly isn't. Thanks, CyanGardevoir (used EDIT!) 23:09, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
New messagesYou can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Hello. Not to be too negative towards you, but may I kindly ask about this notice? I am assuming that it was accidentally issued, as I do not believe that I had recently made any such addition. Thank you. 70.248.176.149 (talk) 23:49, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
C1793Sc006yI found a reference to possessives: MOS:POSS either is OK. It is not, however, a grammatical error as was indicated on User talk:C1793Sc006y's edit summaries. We need a different version of wp:engvar! ;) Cheers! Jim1138 (talk) 03:43, 11 June 2012 (UTC) Your messageHi! I read your last request on my talk page. It's really no problem. Master Katarn (talk) 04:22, 11 June 2012 (UTC) About Jarnail Singh BhindrawaleHi, I received emails from you about a case of vandalism on Jarnail Singh Bhindrawale wikipedia page. Could you explain the reasons of this warning! As it reads Class 1 warning. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vickle1777 (talk • contribs) 04:42, 11 June 2012 (UTC) Use of Huggle and IglooHello, Solarra. I see that you do a large amount of work with Huggle and Igloo. Thanks for your useful contributions. However, I am somewhat concerned by the number of inappropriate reversions and warnings you make with these tools. You are clearly acting in perfectly good faith, and sometimes you have quickly realised your mistake quickly and reverted it (though not always). However, these tools need considerable care. Except in cases of extreme and blatant vandalism, you need to check carefully before pressing the button. Personally, when using Huggle, I always keep a browser window open, so that in any case where there may be any doubt at all I can check the relevant history there before returning to Huggle. This slows me down considerably, but that is a cost that needs to be paid for the benefit of making sure I get it right. As you probably know, rollback rights can be removed from a user who persistently misuses them, whether intentionally or not, and I sincerely hope that will not happen to you, as you use them to do a significant amount of useful work, so I suggest thinking about this and being very careful. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:06, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Your reverts of edits by GinGin-1995Hi, I could wrong, but these edits (for example this one) do not look like vandalism to me. The editor seems to have doing apparently constructive work over a long period. I'm no expert on the article topic, and it's possible that reversion was correct, but the vandalism warnings (levels 1 to 3 in about half an hour) seem particularly harsh and likely to discourage someone of whom we should be assuming good faith. Regards, Mcewan (talk) 11:32, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Update of EmuellidaeHello, This is to inform you that I intend to update the articles on Emuellidae, Emuella and Balcoracania, and redirect the species articles to the genera. I also want to turn the usefull references into in-line citations. It strikes me that most current references are not particularly usefull, since they are general sources pertaining to the combination of Australia and trilobite. I will remove Holyoakia from the genera under the Emuellidae, following recent literature, but will discuss the taxonomic history of teh Emuellidae and mention this genusis moved to the Dorypygidae (which I also have to create). I appreciate feed-back. Kind regards, Dwergenpaartje (talk) 14:34, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
NicknamesWould you please tell me what is defined as a source for nicknames? Such a thing by definition can not exist. An editorial by an AP writer can not, and should not, be considered a source simply because the writer writes the name in print. It is not uncommon for a writer to label an athlete with a positive or derogatory nickname never used before based on recent actions or performances. Based on that rationale, it would be okay to include a once used derogatory nickname that was included in an AP article. On the flip side, a common knowledge nickname may be disqualified from inclusion based on the lack of a "source." This logic does not yield accurate wiki information. The subject on nicknames needs to be better defined because inconsistent treatment is given to different wiki pages.--Jmurdock21 (talk) 02:36, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
Unconstructive?Why was my edit unconstructive? He inserted "he had a big bone and a funny bone and died in 1969" at the bottom of the page? How is his edit constructive? --Cgtdk (talk) 15:30, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
HelloI had made changes to the TBBT page. The song title is "History of Everything". My edit is hardly disruptive. The song title is History of Everything. Google it.
User page semi-protectedAfter looking at the recent history of your user page, I've semi-protected it indefinitely. Let me know if you'd like it un-protected. Toddst1 (talk) 22:32, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Deletion of My Content.On My talk page pertaining to the deletion I noticed you sent this " A page you created, Material Resourcing, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant." The page "Material Resourcing" was going to be about none of those things, in fact I hadn't even gotten a chance to get started before the page was deleted. I figured since Wikipedia has an editing feature this would allow me to construct the page over-time, is this not the case ? Respectfully, Confused User — Preceding unsigned comment added by Material Resourcing (talk • contribs) 20:53, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Pakistanis in ChinaFYI: That edit to Pakistanis in China probably falls under wp:undue. Inflammatory, not really adding to the article. The source is a book which is likely hard to find. Stuff like this is always hard to deal with! Keep up the good work! Jim1138 (talk) 06:40, 13 June 2012 (UTC) Counter vandalism unit academyHi Solarra, have you seen this? Wikipedia:CVUA I probably should join! Jim1138 (talk) 07:16, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Last changeThe last change you have made in Libyan Civil war page was described on the edit, there are too many sources been added, giving the same information, my point was to put only one for lowering the size of the page, that's it. Clarificationgiven (talk) 12:00, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
RevertsSorry bout that, I'm speedy-reverting with popups, and with more than 1 editor reverting, I may revert incorrectly. Thanks for fixing it (although I was about to). - M0rphzone (talk) 00:53, 15 June 2012 (UTC) Not doing another Edit War on Yvonne Strahovski pageFirst of all i was puttin in a line that looks like this:(Please leave this line alone!, but it had this: < ! - - on each side even though it was together) secondly you're being so biased that i was stating another edit war but i wasn't. All I was doing was puttin this note realiszing what i did wrong and try to move on, capiche! comprende.--DisneyGirlovestacos95 (talk) 01:08, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
I was not vandalising at all.I wrote how this Jephthah was an illegitimate son, which further explains a lot to the reader.I tried to revert it back with cluenet but the link would not work.Thank you for trying to help out though.203.184.29.90 (talk) 10:53, 15 June 2012 (UTC)PS sorry about my placement, wiki edit stuff is scary. I noticed you reverted this IP. What was your objection? It's not clear from your edit summary. --Dweller (talk) 11:19, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
A cupcake for you!
TalkbackMessage added 17:45, 15 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Cheers,
A barnstar for you!
NuSTARHello! I noticed that you performed this rollback and left a warning on AVG1998's talk page. I believe that you misjudged the edit, which appears to have been a good-faith attempt to improve the article by highlighting the letters composing the "NuSTAR" acronym. (Such styling isn't correct, but AVG1998 probably mistakenly thought that it was.) I suggest that you perform a dummy edit to note the erroneous use of rollback and post an explanation/apology at User talk:AVG1998. —David Levy 05:47, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Nh7 (webzine)I have given up flagging db-g7 as people seem to blank pages then add content back. Strange... Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 08:39, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Your signatureCan you please tell me how did you made that lovely signature? I am new to Wikipedia, so i need specific instructions.--◕‿◕Earth100 (talk) 11:19, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
--Deleted by ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ for Readability.-- I don't understand and it dosent work, as seen here, which is now my signature:[[User:Earth100|<font color="gold" face="Comic Sans MS">'''♥ Earth100 ♥'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Earth100|<font color="green">♪ Talk ♪</font>]]</sup> ߷ <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Earth100|<font color="darkgreen">♀ Contribs ♀</font>]]</sub> (talk) 11:59, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
--Deleted by ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ for Readability-- 80.34.36.87Jacksonville metropolitan area, if you do maths you see that whites are 64,8 %, I mean that hispanics are not white, i know cause I'm hispanic and of jew origin and not consider myself white, most of us are mixed race, in fact I'm spanish, soy español de Cádiz, Andalucía. I only wanted to put the numbers right , cause if you add hispanics as whites the number is more than 100 %. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.34.36.87 (talk) 11:38, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletionHi there Solarra. I've declined your speedy deletion request on Tohfa because it is not patent nonsense. The G1 tag only applies if an article is complete gibberish (such as ";fsghoijsghfbi"). Though the article may not be notable, it is still possible to read and understand what is written, so the speedy deletion tag is not quite right. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 11:50, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Kittah!Me like kittens. Please award more kittens whenever possible. ʝunglejill 12:20, 16 June 2012 (UTC) A barnstar for you!
thanks solarra i bet you're cute to use the law jargon — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.21.169.30 (talk) 12:57, 16 June 2012 (UTC) Thank you for the welcomeJust a quick hello to thank you for the welcome. I've been editing under an IP for the last month or so and I see that I have much to learn, heh. I note you're a law student — just FYI, I am also involved with law (cyberlaw and defamation matters to be precise). Best wishes. One21dot216dot (talk) 14:12, 16 June 2012 (UTC) ThanksThanks, mate! Just improving our data. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cb34box (talk • contribs) 14:22, 16 June 2012 (UTC) Thank you ...For removing the vandalism warning. If you get across the pond, be sure to stop in Tucson, AZ. Jeffrey M Dean (talk) 16:34, 16 June 2012 (UTC) Teh lolzI think you may appreciate this. ʝunglejill 16:34, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
TablesHi solarra, how I make table on wiki...please guide me.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.242.117.142 (talk) 04:58, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello!I am just wondering if you have anything better to do than going around telling off other people for writing true facts. You probably don't Just because this may make you feel important please check your facts before telling others off. (120.151.154.135 (talk) 05:04, 17 June 2012 (UTC))person who is pissed off with you.
Unreferenced materialDear Solarra, I am very concerned about your comment on my talk page about my recent edits to Sergeant Stubby. I changed it back to the previous status of him being "of unknown breed" because absolutely none of the sources listed reference Sergeant Stubby as an "American Pitbull [sic] Terrier." Does Wikipedia really stand for putting unreferenced material in there like that? I ask that you please uphold Wikipedia's standards of truthfulness. Thanks. 174.71.119.74 (talk) 05:54, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
Speedy Deletion of my ArticleSolara! Can you tell me what was the reason of the deletion of my article because I provided the reference from Google Books and I think i saw many articles with Google Books' references. Solara! My Article person is real and he is the author of 12 Books. He is very well known internationally even you may google his name and you'll see the results in millions. No doubt I am new to wiki as an article writer but you should have advised me instead of deleting the article. Can you help me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Qasimwiki (talk • contribs) 06:32, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
CVUAHi Solarra. You applied at the enrollment page of CVUA (Counter Vandalism academy) and has been enrolled by me, a instructor at CVUA. If you have any doubts, and any confusion regarding vandalism, please poke me and I'll be at your service :-). Also, I might watch your recent vandalism reverts and recent AIV reports to make sure you're not going on the wrong path. Thanks and happy editing! Dipankan (Have a chat?) 06:34, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Correcting a correctionHi Solarra, Did you send me a communique about a correction to an Wikipage about Dundee which I had corrected? Dave — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.51.184.183 (talk) 08:59, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
My signatureDear Solarra, The "talk" link isn't clickable, can you please tell me how to solve the problem? (please talk back in my talk page) See: -- ✯Earth100✯◕‿◕ [[Talk ]] Contribs 09:06, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi!Nice to meet you. I've noticed your colorful name stamp many times while looking through recent changes. I am a student of user Pol430 and we are on the vandalism section of the course at this time. It is my assignment to find, fix, and communicate that to the editor with appropriate template warning/s. Thank you for offering to help me, I appreciate that. It's kinda nice to have instant help when you need it, since we are both online right now."Selene Scott (talk) 09:10, 17 June 2012 (UTC)"
AhmadiyyaDear Solarra, By wikipedia definition this is not vandalism. It is direct quotation from Ahmadiyyah.org. It is entirely relevant to the title of the movement as it is the major difference between Muslims and Ahmadiyya. I do not think that ganging up on a new user is either meritorious or respectful of the lofty aims of wikipedia. I do not believe either yourself or the other user who edited the text is a scholar of comparitive religion. I am currently studying in this field and I am confident that this is a reputable quotation. (Steeringly (talk) 11:36, 17 June 2012 (UTC)) Pleae advise me how I should go about suggesting these amendments to be made to the wikipedia page? Kind regards (Steeringly (talk) 12:02, 17 June 2012 (UTC))
Again calling edits that not a vandalism as a vandalismThis edit [2] was not a vandalism.Please read WP:VANDAL.Like I said before such edits maybe considered as violation of WP:NPA.--Shrike (talk) 11:37, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
 Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
A requestHi there! Can you please make the background colour more light (less glittering). It is causing some strain to the eye. Thanks! →TSU tp* 11:58, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Guest-bookJust left a note to inform that I have signed it. Cheers! →TSU tp* 12:27, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Wishart in DundeeHi Solarra, If Wishart had been preaching in 1844 (as per the original text) he would have been over 300 years old. I changed it to 1544 to accord with his lifespan and by assuming a typo. Dave — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.51.184.183 (talk) 12:31, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Reply
Removal of request to explain your vandalism accusationEricJason posted a request that you explain why you called his edits vandalism.[3] In response, you removed his request from your talk page without comment.[4] At about that same time, DBigXray agreeded with another user, Shrike, that you called Shrike's edits vandalism when they were not.[5] Shrike then backed up another user's request to you, Steeringly,[6] that Steeringly's edits were not vandalism.[7] Did you contact each of these users and appologize for your accusation? If not, that leaves a string of hurt new users in your wake that are more likely to leave the project and less likely to stay around. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 12:54, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
ahmadiyyaplease take a look at the sources. the first one uses the derogatory "qadiani"-term, and is a webpage of a mosque! the second source is the webpage of the smaller *lahore ahmadiyya movement*, an antagonist sect, who also uses the derogatory "qadiani"-term... about the mainstream ahmadiyya muslim community, their rivals! the sources are quite biased and unreliable. the ahmadiyya-page has been vandalized by the single purpose accounts many times before. just like now.-- altetendekrabbe 12:58, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Dear Solarra and Dougweller, Hope your well...Mondays! :-) I would have expected you would want to address my comments on the talk page of Ahmadiyya as quickly as you removed my original comments. Please could you expedite this process as soon as possible. Alternatively please advise me of a time frame to address this. Kind regards (Steeringly (talk) 11:13, 18 June 2012 (UTC)) Thanks—vandalism repairThanks for your intervention on my talk page—I appreciate it. --Old Moonraker (talk) 13:18, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
An alpaca for you!
Talk page archivingHi, I noticed that you have been using the 'move' method of archiving your user talk page. Of course, you are free to continue to use this method, but it has some unfortunate downsides. Did you know there is a bot that will automatically archive your talk page messages, at an interval of your choosing, without splitting the page history? You can find out more at User:MiszaBot/Archive HowTo. If you would like to give it a go, but need some more help just let me know. Pol430 talk to me 14:50, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Please accept this vandalNext time you're out of vandals, take a look at 107.3.63.148 (talk · contribs) and the warm message I left on his talk page. Regards, ʝunglejill 20:36, 17 June 2012 (UTC) VandalismI see you tagged the same guy I did about that whole page of 'stuff'. I was told today it was actually okay."Selene Scott (talk) 23:31, 17 June 2012 (UTC)" Hi Solarra!I've run into you a couple of times now. Most recently, we've both dealt with $KingKitteh's obnoxiousness. I think another time was at an RfA, but I'm not sure. Anyway, wanna be wikifriends? :) Rotorcowboy talk
Mistaken revertHi Solarra, the edits that you reverted at Phenomenological life are admittedly very weird, and I don't understand them either, but they were definitely not vandalism. Graham87 06:25, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Moving article Mahindra United World College of IndiaHi I want to move the article Mahindra United World College of India to UWC Mahindra College. Since I accidentally created a page for UWC Mahindra College, i cannot 'move' Mahindra United World College of India to UWC Mahindra College. The reason for moving is that the school has adopted a new name.
You keep beating me to the punch!And getting the most succulent reverts as well. Maybe this note will distract you long enough for me to revert one or two! :o) Jim1138 (talk) 07:24, 18 June 2012 (UTC) ThanksThanks for the reverts on my talk page. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:53, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
About NikkiI just replaced the image that all.--(talk→ Kkm010 ←track) 09:23, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
I was just adding sm informationonly for future reference .. i used some direct Quotes copied form sm sites Is it also nt allowed here?? And all the information that i uploaded before can be uploaded in my own language? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marwahasaab (talk • contribs) 09:53, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hari_Singh_Nalwa This one
All my Addition to this article has not been restored: Thank u Very Much :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marwahasaab (talk • contribs) 10:21, 18 June 2012 (UTC) Mu SigmaWhy have you tagged Mu Sigma Inc. wikipedia page for speedy deletion? Analytics is a growing industry and companies in this field are gaining importance. Mu Sigma is one of them. So, kindly remove this tag immediately. Rajesh Raveendran 10:06, 18 June 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ms.ind (talk • contribs)
Hi Solarra!How are you? Please can we talk private. This is my private mail: ljekpericismail@yahoo.com Hope to hear from you ASAP! Thanks, Pro Sport Media — Preceding unsigned comment added by Promediasport (talk • contribs) 10:49, 18 June 2012 (UTC) The No Spam Barnstar
Anti-vandalismHi Solarra, I've noticed you out-and-about today fighting vandalism — this is good, we need all the help we can get to keep Wikipedia tidy. However, I can see from your talk page and recent edits that you may be getting a little over-zealous in your efforts to clean the place up. There are a number of events in your edit history that are giving me cause for concern — to pick a few examples:
I could go on, but the above suffices to show that you may be getting a little carried away with this work. I seem to recall seeing you signed up at the Counter-Vandalism academy recently — who did you end up with as an instructor? It may be worth holding off on doing any more reverts until you've had a chat with them. I hope this isn't discouraging; it isn't meant as such. I'd just hate to see a promising patroller getting into trouble for performing too many ill-advised reverts; people get their tools taken away for that sort of thing. If, per your userpage, you want to run for administrator rights one day, you'll need to do some work on identifying vandalism - WP:VANDAL is important, but so is WP:AGF... Yunshui 雲水 12:57, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
?what was nonconstructive at my edit? Zgonea (talk) 14:10, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
External Link to "Ankle Biter" Essay in Tsutomu Shimomura ArticleSolarra, I am Wikipedia user MichaelCrawford, but I've been editing without logging in lately because I am having some email trouble that prevents me from resetting my password. I'll get my password reset before too long, and will of course always log in after that. I apologize if you misunderstood my intentions when I linked to [my essay about Tsutomu Shimomura] at [Solving the Software Problem]. My Edit Summary did specifically say to see the Talk Page, but you reverted my edit less than three or four MINUTES after I submitted it, long before I had the opportunity to post anything at all on the Talk Page. How about using the article's Talk Page for its intended purpose, by allowing those editors with an interest in the article to discuss it among ourselves? I intended to post the Talk Page my reasoning for linking my essay, as well as specifically identify myself as MichaelCrawford, as I have been doing with each of the edits I've been making since I've been unable to log in to my account here. That link was not in any way any manner of vandalism! Tsutomu and I were very, very close friends for many years. Both of us being Physics Majors in the Caltech Ricketts House Class of 1986, we were frequent study partners as well. I have no doubt whatsoever that I personally know Tsutomu far better than any other Wikipedia editor, and so can more insightfully convey to the reader what Tsutomu is really like as a human being. I've been reading all the online and dead-tree press about him for years, but other than Bruce Sterling's quote about Tsutomu testifying before Congress in sandals and cut-off shorts, I've never seen any written material anywhere that describes the Tsutomu that I know. To quote from my essay:
I will have you know: TSUTOMU IS JUST LIKE THAT! The Mind Simply Reels. After I save this post to your talk page, I'll post it also at Talk:Tsutomu Shimomura, then I'm going to revert your reversion of my link so as to put it back in. If you have a problem with that, rather than dive-bombing my edits withing minutes of my submtting them, how about allowing the Talk:Tsutomu Shimomura page to serve its intended purpose, by allowing all who are interested in Tsutomu's article to discuss it among ourselves? Good Day. MichaelCrawford 50.131.200.103 (talk) 14:11, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Declined speedy deletionJust a note to let you know that I declined your speedy deletion tagging of Cassette (film). WP:CSD#A7 only applies to people, animals, organizations, and web content without an assertion of importance. Films don't fall under those categories. Now, it is possible that you were tagging it under the grounds of web content, since, as far as I can tell, the film has only been released online, but the way it was written, I felt it was too borderline for speedy deletion. However, since I don't think the film meets our notability requirements, I did prod the article for deletion. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:24, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
TalkbackMessage added 14:42, 18 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Mistaken for spam?On the Alma Har'el page, you reverted the addition of a YouTube link as spam. The link appears only to have been an addition to a section that listed music videos by Har'el. That doesn't qualify as spam, does it? --Jprg1966 (talk) 15:17, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
All...going right? Do you have any doubts? I'm leaving this message because you beat me in reverting vandalism today :) I am clicking on "revert" in Huggle and seeing you pop up before Huggle actually reverts it. Great work! 15:30, 18 June 2012 (UTC) I replaces your speedy tag with G12. Just though I'd let you know. Thanks. The Determinator p t c 17:20, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Personal IssuesIShadowed, I don't appreciate the way you treated me in IRC earlier. If you have a specific issues with my conduct or edits please talk to me civilly, but I do not consider the allegations you made regarding my integrity justified. I hope that we can resolve whatever issues you may have with me in a civil and just manner, and I look forward to discussing this in a public forum where we can resolve whatever issues we may have. Thank you. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ Hello I am trying to convert the gold page to metric. I do not understand how this is considered vandalism. The metric kilogram is becoming more frequently used when measuring gold. In the picture contained within the article you can see for yourself that in fact gold is measured using the kilogram standard. Wikipedia prefers metric over the old junk system of imperial units. Please tell me what action I need to further take to convert the gold page to metric as are many other articles in Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.240.23.111 (talk) 00:46, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
AdoptionHello! Per what we discussed in IRC, I will be your adopter! As an adopter, I have a certain requirement of policies, methods and programs to teach you but since you are an experienced editor I am sure you know a lot.
Cheers, Riley Huntley talk No talkback needed; I'll temporarily watch here. 01:31, 19 June 2012 (UTC) Improper revert?Explain why you made this reversion? [8] — raekyt 01:49, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
'Juicy and wet'Love that vandal edit you just changed for Meow Mix!"Selene Scott (talk) 02:50, 19 June 2012 (UTC)"
What?Who are you? and why you changed the topic for PICkit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.108.157.239 (talk) 12:42, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
TalkbackMessage added 10:28, 3 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Arctic Kangaroo 10:28, 3 April 2013 (UTC) Age of consent in IndiaThe age of consent in India is now 18, under the new law signed by the president. Why did you revert my change?
read the source; it says: "The law has fixed age for consensual sex at 18 years. Pranab Mukherjee has given his assent to the Anti-rape Bill, providing enhanced punishment for rape, making stalking and voyeurism criminal offences and fixing the age of consent for sex at 18."
"The law has fixed age for consensual sex at 18 years". And do more research yourself, but please don't revert correct changes.12:04, 3 April 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.25.27.35 (talk)
Hello. Please take a look at this, and consider commenting there. Thanks. -- Hoary (talk) 13:24, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Warning you placed on User:Tony HolkhamEdit to Mona's Queen (1934) shown by you in this diff, is not vandalism, and level 3 warning was unwarranted. Please be more careful and remember to assume good faith. The editor is new to WP, was spooked and concerned. He emailed me to discuss as I had given him a level 2 on the same set of edits. Reviewing the edits, I have to concur with him. -- Alexf(talk) 14:53, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Please see the article's talk page for the explanation of the dilemma and request for thoughts... which is what I should have done in the first place; thanks :-) Tony Holkham (talk) 20:45, 3 April 2013 (UTC) The user from the UkraineThe user from the Ukraine has removed information on Cossack societies in Japan because of the radical views that Anglo-Saxons and Asians can not be Cossacks. But Maxim Krivonos was a Scot. There was a lot of Kalmyks and Buryats among Cossacks. There were Asians even among Vikings according to the archeological data. Lavr Kornilov had not only Kalmyk origin, but he had a Tatar (Moslem) grandmother. So there were not only different races, but different faiths as well among Cossacks. General Karbyshev was white and Christian, but a Tatar (Kryashen).
The user 72... even removed information on Alexander Pushkin as an African Russian, who wrote a heterosexual poem about Mazepa, in his opinion. They recognize only "Mazepa" by Lord Byron as an LGBT poem. They hate Africans as heterosexuals and the enemies of LGBT, in their opinion. Typical WP:FRINGE — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.71.0.246 (talk) 21:49, 3 April 2013 (UTC) Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping! If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:22, 3 April 2013 (UTC) VaginismusHello, I noticed your message. The previous edit was not vandalism, it is possible to check it for example on Wiktionary, although I personally don't know how to put direct Wiktionary links on Wikipedia. 141.136.222.121 (talk) 15:27, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Response to 1933 ConcordatIntegrtiyandhonesty (talk) 00:11, 4 April 2013 (UTC)Hello Solarra The edit of the "1933 Concordat" needed distention from the a Concordat of the same year with Germany. The Concordat referenced here is with Austria. Than you for the update.Integrtiyandhonesty (talk) 00:11, 4 April 2013 (UTC) Vishwaroopam Box OfficeHi I have many sources for Vishwaroopam Box Office, that is, the collection exceeding the 200 crore mark. Please refer these links. http://www.metromasti.com/kollywood/gossip/Viswaroopam-50th-day-total-collections-Vishwaroopam-box-office/25900 http://www.smskhan.com/2013/03/14/box-office-collection-of-viswaroopam-48-days-vishwaroopam-48th-day/ http://www.newsmirchi.in/vishwaroopam-hit-48-days-earning-at-cinemavishwaroopam-48th-day-income/2516/ http://superwoods.com/photo-galleries/jiiva/news-id-viswaroopam-45rd-day-collections-viswaroopam-box-office-collections-11-03-136348.htm Request to update it accordingly Thanks, Vijayabasker — Preceding unsigned comment added by VijayEmerio (talk • contribs) 03:23, 4 April 2013 (UTC) your removal of my article revisionHi Solarra, thanks for dropping me a line about your removal of my comments. I think they should be added back to the article. By their very nature, there cannot be any references, as follows: statement (i) [in essence]: 'current concepts of hair growth cannot account for the continued growth of transplanted hair': explanation: a 'reference' for that would be a meta-review of all research on hair growth. However, the research presented in the article (further below) already illustrates the point that all those mechanisms don't explain why one hair from the same individual would grow in one site after putting it in there while others from the same individual don't. I think it is important to point that out because people mostly don't realize that all the molecular pathways don't explain that obvious clinical observation. statement (ii): there are no genetic twin studies for male balding explanation: I checked it on PubMed and Google-- be my guest, do the same! How do you reference 'searched on PubMed but not found'??? kind regards John — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.36.198.228 (talk) 08:18, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Your removal of my edits to the machine translation comparison pageHi Solarra — thank you for writing to me about the edits I made to this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_machine_translation_applications Can you tell me why you think the source I cited (www.bing.com/translator/help) is not sufficient proof that Bing Translator supports the languages that I added to the article? The language list as listed on this official Microsoft page is as follows: CURRENTLY SUPPORTED LANGUAGES Arabic Finnish Italian Romanian Vietnamese Bulgarian French Japanese Russian Catalan German Korean Slovak Chinese Simplified Greek Latvian Slovenian Chinese Traditional Haitian Creole Lithuanian Spanish Czech Hebrew Malay Swedish Danish Hindi Norwegian Thai Dutch Hmong Daw Persian Turkish English Hungarian Polish Ukrainian Estonian Indonesian Portuguese Urdu You can actually try them at http://bing.com/translator. Here is the blog announcement: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/translation/archive/tags/languages/ Would love to hear from you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.22.0.40 (talk) 08:40, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Hello, thanksBut the edit was made because that user make attack. When I editted page, I included reasons on talk page. User SeanHoyland only reverted and made an attack at me and another user with no constructive addition. So I remove his attack, but no harm done. Dasixiaoriben (talk) 08:43, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
|
