Jump to content

Template talk:Did you know: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Febuary 26: nominate Pelinka
Line 72: Line 72:
{{*mp}}...that the '''[[Shikahogh State Preserve]]''' is a habitat for about 1,100 species of plants, 18 of which have been registered in the Red Book of the [[Soviet Union]]? [[User:Artaxiad|Artaxiad]] 02:22, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
{{*mp}}...that the '''[[Shikahogh State Preserve]]''' is a habitat for about 1,100 species of plants, 18 of which have been registered in the Red Book of the [[Soviet Union]]? [[User:Artaxiad|Artaxiad]] 02:22, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
{{*mp}}...that '''[[Mount Omine]]''' is a sacred mountain in [[Nara prefecture|Nara]], [[Japan]], famous for its controversial ban on women and for its three tests of courage? [[User:MightyAtom|MightyAtom]] 06:53, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
{{*mp}}...that '''[[Mount Omine]]''' is a sacred mountain in [[Nara prefecture|Nara]], [[Japan]], famous for its controversial ban on women and for its three tests of courage? [[User:MightyAtom|MightyAtom]] 06:53, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
{{*mp}}...that '''[[Rob Pelinka]]''', better known as [[Kobe Bryant]]'s agent, was the only player to play in the [[NCAA Men's Division I Basketball Championship]] Tournament for both the 1989 champion [[Michigan Wolverines]] and for both of the 1992 and 1993 runner up teams known as the [[Fab Five]] teams. [[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] 17:52, 26 February 2007 (UTC) P.S. I realize the article is actually 7 days old but this is my first DYK.


===February 25===
===February 25===

Revision as of 17:52, 26 February 2007

After you update the template, please click this link to purge the main page cache,
so the update is shown to everyone.
Jenny Hurn
Jenny Hurn

This page is for nominations to appear in the "Did you know" section on the Main Page. Eligible articles may only be up to 5 days old, or significantly expanded in the last 5 days.

Did you know?
Introduction and rules
IntroductionWP:DYK
General discussionWT:DYK
GuidelinesWP:DYKCRIT
Reviewer instructionsWP:DYKRI
Nominations
Nominate an articleWP:DYKCNN
Awaiting approvalWP:DYKN
ApprovedWP:DYKNA
April 1 hooksWP:DYKAPRIL
Holding areaWP:SOHA
Preparation
Preps and queuesT:DYK/Q
Prepper instructionsWP:DYKPBI
Admin instructionsWP:DYKAI
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
History
StatisticsWP:DYKSTATS
Archived setsWP:DYKA
Just for fun
Monthly wrapsWP:DYKW
AwardsWP:DYKAWARDS
UserboxesWP:DYKUBX
Hall of FameWP:DYK/HoF
List of users ...
... by nominationsWP:DYKNC
... by promotionsWP:DYKPC
Administrative
Scripts and botsWP:DYKSB
On the Main Page
Main Page errorsWP:ERRORS
To ping the DYK admins{{DYK admins}}

Suggestions

List new suggestions here, under the date the article was created or expanded (not the date you submit it here), with the newest dates at the top. If there's a suitable image, place it after the suggestion.

Remember:

  • Proposed articles should be over 1,500 characters (ignoring infoboxes, categories, references) cite sources (these sources should be properly labelled, that is, not under an "External links" header), and be no more than 5 days old (unless it was under 1,500 characters or marked as a stub, and has been expanded by at least an additional 1,500 characters), and should not be marked as stubs. Articles with good references and cites are preferred to those without.
  • Suggested facts should be:
    • Interesting to draw in a variety of readers around the world.
    • Short and pithy (under about 200 characters).
    • Neutral.
    • Definite facts, mentioned in the article.
  • Suggested pictures should be:
    • Suitably freely (PD, GFDL, CC etc) licensed (NOT fair use) as the main page by policy can only have freely licensed pictures.
    • Attractive and interesting, even at a very small (100px wide) resolution
    • In the article already
    • Relevant to the article
  • Proposed lists should have two things to be considered for DYK: (i) be a compilation of entries that are unlikely to have ever been compiled anywhere else (e.g. List of architectural vaults) and (ii) have non-stub text that brings out interesting relational facts from the compiled list that may not otherwise be obvious but for the compilation.
  • Please check back for comments on your nomination. Your entry may miss out on the front page if you don't respond to reasonable objections.

Next update

BACKLOGGED?

This page often seems to be backlogged. If the DYK template has not been updated for substantially more than 6 hours, it may be useful to attract the attention of one of the administrators who regularly updates the template, such as:

Candidate entries

Febuary 26

February 25

File:Romanovicon.png
Does this series have a proper name (like 1 - 1 + 1... is also called Grandi's Series)? Laïka 13:16, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it does… you might like to check out Talk:1 + 2 + 4 + 8 + · · · on that note. Melchoir 20:55, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Spinks is sourced but still a bit slightly stubby (a lot few of his biographical details can't be sourced from any online materials). Self-nom; did this one from scratch after seeing an episode of CSI actually get it wrong! — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] 04:40, 25 February 2007 (UTC) Updated: 22:48, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A more-wikilinked version (but distracts from leading people to the Spinks piece):
The Eastgate Clock
The Eastgate Clock
The Clock Tower, Palace of Westminster bit could be condensed to Big Ben, but then we risk people commenting at WP:ERRORS that Big Ben is technically the bell, not the clock. I'll leave it up to the admin to decide. Laïka 13:16, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 24

Church Street Station Post Office in New York City

February 23

February 22

File:Kanawha.jpg

February 21

...that the term White Genocide is used to describe the forcible deportations and massacres of Armenians from their homeland in Anatolia during the Armenian Genocide?. Artaxiad 14:49, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ha, sorry, I meant the article was a little short, not the hook. Yomanganitalk 14:54, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Heh, i was confused I'll find more info. Artaxiad 00:45, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 20

* ...that while still pregnant, the mother of Matryona Nikonova, who was born without eyes, had a prophetic dream in which a beautiful white bird with empty eye sockets landed on her? article created by User:Bookworm857158367, nominated by John Carter 16:56, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When you say "is not factual", what exactly do you mean? Stories about saints and so on tend to involve an element of the miraculous, so that doesn't really seem to be a strong obstacle. The lack of referencing, though, is. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 11:43, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
How about adding the phrase "is said" to the entry? Because Tragic Baboon is technically right. The entry blurb claims that something that likely did not happen to have happened even if it's obvious that its meant to be miracoulous. But its still not referenced--Carabinieri 02:19, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fine by me. How about this:
  • ...that while still pregnant, the mother of Matryona Nikonova, who was born without eyes, is said to have had a prophetic dream in which a beautiful white bird with empty eye sockets landed on her?
or, alternately,

Banking in Russia

I gave that article a Rough Translation template. Art LaPella 23:14, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I must state that the "Rough Translation" template is not justified in this article because the cryptic words you see are actually the name of the specific regulation in Russia. I have removed the template, and made some minor grammatical corrections. --Parker007 02:12, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
But it still needs considerable copyediting.--Carabinieri 02:36, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't that the purpose of DYK? So more publicity = more people willing to edit? Where exactly are you refering to for "considerable copyediting"? --Parker007 03:48, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have often copyedited similar foreign articles, but I can't copyedit this article because I can't always guess what it means. If a financial professional like myself doesn't understand it, other Wikipedia readers won't either, and most of the translation problems are unrelated to banking jargon. For more details see Talk:Banking in Russia. Art LaPella 07:52, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rough Translation Template

Every sentence should be rewritten to sound as if an American (or Englishman etc.) had written it - for instance, the first sentence "Banking in Russia has significant specifics" means something like "There are significant specific details affecting banking in Russia".

 Done --Parker007 17:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In most cases I (or any American etc.) could make those edits. However, there are several passages where I don't understand what it means. Here are the hardest to understand passages:

"Those legislation statements regulated credit organization activity on the territory of Russian Federation have its own specificity differed from foreign one." Foreign what? Foreign legislation statements, foreign credit organizations, or credit organizations not on Russian Federation territory? The sentence appears to have "Those legislation statements" as a subject, "regulated" as a verb, "credit ...Federation" as an object, and the rest of the sentence is an extra predicate - I don't know how it fits into the sentence.

I removed it  Done --Parker007 17:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Mandatory client classification and counterparties of banks is performed in correspondence with special approved in Russia directories..." "Classification" can be "performed", but "counterparties" are people or organizations, so how can "classification and counterparties" be "performed"? Only tasks can be performed, not people or organizations. "Special" is an adjective, so I can't guess if it is intended as a noun (the object of the preposition "with") or an adverb (modifying "approved", in which case the preposition has no object.) Whatever "special approved" means, I can't guess what "correspondence with special approved" is at all.

 Done --Parker007 17:51, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"20 digits every of those have its special semantic value." Words have semantic value, not digits. Maybe it should say "20 digits, each of which has a predefined meaning."

 Done --Parker007 17:57, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"conust" is not a word. Words like "adjust" or "proceed" (individually or together?) might fit the context, but I wouldn't want to guess.

 Done --Parker007 17:57, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Particularly, tax payments are specially exposed." Taken literally, it says tax payments are left in the open for all to see - perhaps naked. Admittedly, I can probably guess what this means - that the tax payments are specially audited or reported.

 Done --Parker007 17:57, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The other half of the article has similar problems. But I've already made my point, and any native-born American would agree: This article should be rewritten by someone who understands both banking in Russia, and the English language. The English in this article is much better than my Russian (see Talk:Sukharev Tower), but it isn't always good enough to be understood. Art LaPella 07:25, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me where exactly?  Done --Parker007 17:59, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Even with all the edits done above, the article is very difficult to comprehend — in some places ambiguous and others completely unclear. Even the introductory sentences are unclear. — ERcheck (talk) 20:04, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, Parker007 for your work so far. I'm continuing at Talk:Banking in Russia. Art LaPella 20:20, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Continued

Thank you. As I explained, I will want to rewrite the article in general when I have a better idea what it means, after which you should make sure I haven't misrepresented its meaning. Continuing:

"The margin settled as a result of clearing..." Does this mean the margin between the official exchange rate and the market exchange rate, reported as a profit to the Bank?  Done --Parker007 02:43, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is a "deal passport"? Does it mean "deal" in the sense of "contract"? In my experience, passports are for traveling people, not for contracts - but maybe contracts in Russia need their own passports.


"Regulating of reserves volume on deposits must make every month..." Bank deposits are made when the account holder chooses to deposit, not necessarily every month. Does this mean that every month, someone verifies that the reserves are high enough to comply with regulations?

"...and apply strict sanctions to infringes just to license recall." "infringes" probably means "infringements", but the most puzzling word is "just". Does it mean that the Bank of Russia is authorized to recall the licenses of banks that infringe the regulations, but is not authorized to do anything more?

 Done --Parker007 02:45, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"...own construction works..." Is "own" used in the adjective sense of "belonging to yourself", so that "own construction works" means "the taxpayer's own construction projects"? Or is "own" used as a verb, so that the phrase means "when the taxpayer buys construction projects"? Does "transferring ... for own needs too" mean that business assets have been transferred to personal use? Is "when fulfil responsibilities of tax agent" mean that the tax agent must pay the VAT for his own work, or does it mean that the taxpayer is fulfilling some unspecified responsibility to a tax agent? I would think that reporting liability for a VAT tax, would in itself fulfil responsibility to a tax agent.  Done --Parker007 02:52, 26 February 2007 (UTC) Art LaPella 20:12, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Parker007 and I have now gone through the entire article, if he approves of my latest version. Art LaPella 06:20, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In future, it would be best to discuss copy-editing articles on the specific article's talk page. This page will struggle to support discussions of this size without nominations getting lost. Yomanganitalk 10:13, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Expired noms

February 19

Ineligible; too short (stub) — needs expansion. — ERcheck (talk) 02:43, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This article (Ilaiyaraaja) does not qualify for DYK, as the article was created long ago, and did not undergo any overwhelming improvement lately.--Dwaipayan (talk) 06:07, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, we expect at least 75-80% new content. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:01, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Marked as stub. Rigadoun (talk) 17:47, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've removed the stub. It has sufficient content for it to be removed. - Erebus555 18:31, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have proposed deletion. This road is NN. - Tragic Baboon (banana receptacle) 18:45, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I count only 1,474 characters in the main body. It needs at least 1,500 characters to be considered. However, the AfD should toll the 5 day rule to give this article a chance at DYK if it survives AfD.-- Jreferee 17:40, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I expanded the article to 2,453 characters and added my name as a co-nom. I contacted Carl Chinn to ask if he would add to the article as well. Please keep this nomination open in the expired nomination's area until the AfD is resolved. -- Jreferee 19:07, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I bolded the new article and piped the diocese to the appropriate one (according to the List of the Roman Catholic dioceses of the Philippines. Since the article name doesn't include his title (Bishop), and it's mentioned later in the nom, I don't think it needs to be included before his name. Rigadoun (talk) 17:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The article was actually finished on Feb 16. Is there something more unusual about the subject? At any time there will be somebody holding a given position. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:01, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Revision: * ...that Antonieto Cabajog was a Paring Bol-anon who became Bishop of Surigao at the age of 43? --Ate Pinay (talkemail) 11:52, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

After 16 February there have been very little content additions. The next edit was done on Feb 22. --Parker007 02:20, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
After February 16th, info from the WWW have been exhausted already. What else was I supposed to do? I think he deserves to be WP:DYK. Please re-consider. Thank you. --Ate Pinay (talkemail) 02:46, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

February 18

February 17

February 16

See also

Please archive Did you know entries thematically at the relevant portal: