Jump to content

Tulsi Gabbard 2020 presidential campaign: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎Media coverage: reinserting b/c there's no reason to play it down either
→‎Media coverage: WP:N does not apply to the content of an article. I shortened and reworded the text.
Line 69: Line 69:
===Media coverage===
===Media coverage===


Gabbard has received very little news coverage relative to her polling position.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.axios.com/andrew-yang-2020-media-attention-acc2652a-e43b-45fb-8e88-42e606ab0be8.html|title=Andrew Yang gets media cold shoulder|website=Axios|language=en|access-date=2019-10-10}}</ref> In addition, much of the coverage she has received campaign has been very negative. In February 2019, The Intercept's [[Glenn Greenwald]] criticized NBC News for attacking Gabbard via discredited sources who previously got caught interfering in the 2017 Alabama Senate election using fabricated data in a [[False flag|false flag]] information attack.<ref>{{cite news| last=Greenwald|first=Glenn| url=https://theintercept.com/2019/02/03/nbc-news-to-claim-russia-supports-tulsi-gabbard-relies-on-firm-just-caught-fabricating-russia-data-for-the-democratic-party|title=NBC News, to Claim Russia Supports Tulsi Gabbard, Relies on Firm Just Caught Fabricating Russia Data for the Democratic Party|work=The Intercept|date=February 3, 2019|access-date=August 17, 2019}}</ref> In May 2019, Rolling Stone's Matt Taibbi stated, "we have hit a new low in campaign hit pieces", after Gabbard's campaign was attacked by The Daily Beast, CNN and Politico.<ref>{{cite news|last=Taibbi|first=Matt| url=https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/taibbi-tulsi-gabbard-bernie-sanders-trump-2020-838156|title=We’ve Hit a New Low in Campaign Hit Pieces|work=Rolling Stone|date=May 21, 2019|access-date=August 17, 2019}}</ref> Following the July 31, 2019 debate, where "Gabbard exposed Kamala Harris' troubling record as a prosecutor", A.B. Stoddard, associate editor of Real Clear Politics, said "it is all over the internet today that the Russian bots are helping Tulsi Gabbard and going after Kamala Harris. And that Tulsi Gabbard refuses to condemn Assad because she's doing the work of the Russians and is going to run as a third-party spoiler and reelect Trump. There are serious knives out for Tulsi Gabbard".<ref>{{cite news|last=Keilar|first=Brianna|url=http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1908/01/crn.02.html|title=Gabbard Confronted On Syria And Remarks About Assad|work=CNN|date=August 1, 2019|access-date=August 17, 2019}}</ref>
Gabbard has received very little news coverage relative to her polling position.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.axios.com/andrew-yang-2020-media-attention-acc2652a-e43b-45fb-8e88-42e606ab0be8.html|title=Andrew Yang gets media cold shoulder|website=Axios|first=Neal|last=Rothschild|first2=Sara|last2=Fischer|date=September 3, 2019|language=en|access-date=2019-10-10}}</ref> In addition, much of the coverage she has received campaign has been very negative. In February 2019, shortly after Gabbard's [[Tulsi Gabbard 2020 presidential campaign#Launch|campaign launch]], The Intercept's [[Glenn Greenwald]] criticized NBC News for attacking Gabbard via discredited sources who previously got caught interfering in the 2017 Alabama Senate election using fabricated data in a [[False flag|false flag]] information attack.<ref>{{cite news| last=Greenwald|first=Glenn| url=https://theintercept.com/2019/02/03/nbc-news-to-claim-russia-supports-tulsi-gabbard-relies-on-firm-just-caught-fabricating-russia-data-for-the-democratic-party|title=NBC News, to Claim Russia Supports Tulsi Gabbard, Relies on Firm Just Caught Fabricating Russia Data for the Democratic Party|work=The Intercept|date=February 3, 2019|access-date=August 17, 2019}}</ref> In May 2019, after Gabbard's interview with Joe Rogan<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kR8UcnwLH24 |title=Joe Rogan Experience #1295 - Tulsi Gabbard |website=Joe Rogan on YoutTube|first=Joe|last=Rogan|language=en|date=May 13, 2019 |access-date=2019-10-10}}</ref>, Rolling Stone's [[Matt Taibbi]] stated, "we have hit a new low in campaign hit pieces" after Gabbard's campaign was attacked by The Daily Beast, CNN and Politico.<ref>{{cite news|last=Taibbi|first=Matt| url=https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/taibbi-tulsi-gabbard-bernie-sanders-trump-2020-838156|title=We’ve Hit a New Low in Campaign Hit Pieces|work=Rolling Stone|date=May 21, 2019|access-date=August 17, 2019}}</ref> Following the [[2020 Democratic Party presidential debates and forums#Second_debates_(July_30–31,_2019)|second presidential debate]] during which Gabbard exposed her competitor Kamala Harris' record as a prosecutor<ref>{{cite news |url=https://edition.cnn.com/videos/politics/2019/08/01/tulsi-gabbard-kamala-harris-prosecutions-record-cnn-democratic-debate-vpx.cnn|title=Gabbard rips Harris' record on criminal prosecutions|work=CNN|date=August 1, 2019|access-date=October 10, 2019}}</ref>, Sky News' James Morrow stated, the media has "Russia paranoia".<ref>{{cite news |last=Morrow|first=James|url=https://www.skynews.com.au/details/_6067825857001|title=Democrat elites tarring Gabbard as a "Russian stooge"|work=Sky News Australia|date=August 4, 2019|access-date=August 17, 2019}}</ref>


In September 2019, Vanity Fair summarized the media coverage of Gabbard's presidential campaign as "the press hates Gabbard even more than it hates Sanders".<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/09/which-democrats-are-secretly-running-for-second-place |title=Veepstakes 2020: Which Democrats Are Secretly Running for Second Place? |website=Vanity Fair|first=T.A.|last=Frank|language=en|date=September 20, 2019 |access-date=2019-09-30}}</ref> [[Vamsee Juluri]], Professor for Media Studies at [[University of San Francisco|USF]] criticized [[National Public Radio]] (NPR) for participating in a "bigoted hinduphobic smear campaign" against Gabbard.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kKv2c1437N4 |title=Today in Hinduphobia: Tulsi Gabbard and NPR |publisher=Vamsee Juluri on Youtube|date=September 25, 2019 |access-date=2019-09-26}}</ref> Gabbard called NPR's interview "very religious bigoted and offensive" for repeating "misinformation, smears and bigoted attacks" from other media.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.wbur.org/hereandnow/2019/09/25/tulsi-gabbard-2020-democrat-candidate |title=2020 Hopeful Tulsi Gabbard: The U.S. Needs To 'Stop Acting As The World's Police' |publisher=wbur|first=Robin|last=Young|first2=Jill|last2=Ryan|first3=Kathleen|last3=McKenna| date=September 25, 2019 |access-date=2019-09-26}}</ref> The Hill's Krystal Ball said NPR smeared Gabbard for her religion, her upbringing and her father's views. Ball described the interview as "the most egregious thing I have ever seen" and "much of it based on [[Conspiracy theory|conspiracy theories]]". Ball added, this type of interview is the "typical treatment" Gabbard gets in the media because she is "so challenging to the mindset and the bipartisan consensus in [[Washington,_D.C.|Washington]]". Referring to the overall campaign coverage, Ball said, "people spun up" the accusation, Gabbard were a "Russian plant" and other "crazy nonsense". The Hill's Saagar Enjeti found NPR's interview "disgusting". Both Ball and Enjeti describe Gabbard as "the most unfairly maligned person in Washington".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LuuldiNoPlE&t=5m19s |title=Saagar Enjeti: Tulsi's outstanding answer on identity politics |publisher=The Hill|first=Krystal|last=Ball|first2=Saagar |last2=Enjeti| date=September 26, 2019 |access-date=2019-09-30}}</ref>
In September 2019, Vanity Fair summarized the media coverage of Gabbard's presidential campaign as "the press hates Gabbard even more than it hates Sanders."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019/09/which-democrats-are-secretly-running-for-second-place |title=Veepstakes 2020: Which Democrats Are Secretly Running for Second Place? |website=Vanity Fair|first=T.A.|last=Frank|language=en|date=September 20, 2019 |access-date=2019-09-30}}</ref>


===Military service during campaign===
===Military service during campaign===

Revision as of 13:35, 10 October 2019

TULSI NOW
Campaign2020 United States presidential election (Democratic Party primaries)
CandidateTulsi Gabbard
U.S. Representative (2013–present)
Member of the Hawaii House of Representatives (2002–2004)
AffiliationDemocratic Party
StatusAnnounced: January 11, 2019
Formal launch: February 2, 2019
HeadquartersKapolei, Hawaii
Key peopleRania Batrice (campaign manager)[1]
Erika Tsuji (spokesperson)[1]
SloganLead with Love[2]
Website
www.tulsi2020.com
This article is part of a series about
Tulsi Gabbard
U.S. Representative
from Hawaii's 2nd district

The 2020 presidential campaign of Tulsi Gabbard, the U.S. Representative for Hawaii's 2nd congressional district, began on January 11, 2019.[3] If Gabbard were to win, she would become the first female, Hindu, and Samoan president in American history, and would be the youngest person to ever hold the office (at the age of 39).[4]

Gabbard speaking to the California Democratic Party State Convention in June 2019.

Background

Gabbard had been a rising figure in the Democratic Party in the lead-up to the 2016 election cycle, when she served as Vice-Chairman of the Democratic National Committee (DNC).[5]

On October 19, 2018, Politico reported that Gabbard was "weighing a 2020 presidential bid" but would not make an announcement until after the 2018 midterm elections.[6] On December 12, 2018, Gabbard said on MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Matthews that she was "seriously considering" running for president in 2020.[7]

Democratic primary campaign

Launch

Gabbard confirmed her intention to seek the Democratic presidential nomination on January 11, 2019, in an interview with CNN's Van Jones.[3] On January 24, she formally launched her campaign by releasing a video on her website.[8] She held a kickoff rally in Hawaii on February 2.[9]

In her campaign launch, Gabbard called on “every one of us" to take a stand against "neolibs and neocons” from both parties “dragging us from one regime change war to the next”; the military industrial complex and foreign policy establishment starting a ‘New Cold War' arms race; and "self-serving politicians" with vested interests in perpetual war.[10]

In February 2019, an NBC news report stated that Gabbard's campaign was being promoted by a number of news and social media outlets that were linked to Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections.[11] Glenn Greenwald criticized NBC for relying on a firm that had previously tried to imitate "an elaborate ‘false flag’ operation" that would plant the idea that Alabama Senatorial candidate Roy Moore was being supported by a "Russian botnet".[12][13] According to Gabbard, NBC had told her they would publish the story the week after her launch, but instead published it two hours before her launch speech.[14]

In a campaign email released later that week, Gabbard said that “media giants ruled by corporate interests … in the pocket of the ‘establishment war machine' deploy journalism “to silence debate and dissent” and use rhetoric “that could lead to nuclear war".[15][16][17]

Campaign management

Shortly after the announcement, campaign manager Rania Batrice and consulting firm Revolution Messaging, having been hired only for the campaign launch, departed from the campaign. Politico reported that sources "familiar with the campaign" referred to Gabbard as "indecisive and impulsive".[1] Her staff though insists that the vacancy in the campaign manager position is the result of "careful deliberation, not campaign dysfunction."[18]

Debates

Further information: 2020 Democratic Party presidential debates and forums

Gabbard was the most searched for candidate on Google after both the first and second Democratic primary debates.[19] During the second debate, Gabbard pointedly criticized Kamala Harris's record as attorney general of California, accusing her of holding innocent people on death row and pointing out Harris's prosecution of marijuana crimes after admitting her own use.[20][21]

In May 2019, the DNC announced that candidates would need to have at least 130,000 individual donors and have received at least 2 percent support in four qualifying polls between June 28 and August 28 in order to qualify for the third primary debate.[22] Such polls could be national or early primary state polls, published by any of the 16 DNC-certified organizations.[23] On August 2nd, the Gabbard campaign announced that it had met the donor threshold to qualify, but had not yet reached the polling threshold.[24]

Tulsi Gabbard poll results during qualification period for September 2019 debates of the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries

On August 23, the Gabbard campaign noted that, in contrast to six polls released in the two weeks following the first debate, only two were released in the two weeks following Gabbard’s strong performance in the second debate. Gabbard criticized the DNC for not explaining why certain polls were qualifying while other "very credible, recognized" polls were not and argued that the process of developing criteria for poll selection "should not be made in secret by party bosses”; that there were oddities regarding where polls were not taking place; and that the lack of “transparency" was creating a "lack of trust in the process".[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]

By August 26th, two days before the deadline, the Gabbard campaign had exceeded the threshold on only two qualifying polls. The campaign called on the DNC to expand the selection of polls considered for qualification, noting that Gabbard had exceeded the 2 percent threshold in 24 other polls, including several from respected polling firms, that were not considered in the DNC's list.[35][36][37][38]

Realclearpolitics columnist Michael Tracey argued that DNC's debate qualification criteria were "increasingly absurd", citing "two polls sponsored by the two largest newspapers in two early primary states" that were not certified by the DNC. Tracey called upon the DNC to honor its declaration in its December 20, 2018 debate 'framework' where it had declared “Given the fluid nature of the presidential nominating process, the DNC will continuously assess the state of the race and make adjustments to this process as appropriate.”[39][40] Vox.com editor Aaron Rupar pushed back on claims that the process lacked transparency, writing that the qualification and polling requirements were made public months in advance, and that expanding the polling criteria so close to the debates would have constituted unfair interference.[41]

FiveThirtyEight's Geoffrey Skelley analyzed which candidates would meet the September debate's qualification criterion of 4 polls above the 2% threshold if slight changes to the DNC's current rule set were applied, he concluded that "there’s an argument to be made that the DNC’s list of eligible pollsters helped make or break qualification for those candidates on the bubble — Gabbard and Steyer in particular."[42]

Directors of The Marist College Institute for Public Opinion voiced arguments against using public opinion polls "to determine presidential primary debate eligibility” as the margin of error in these polls is “wide” and "way beyond" the precision they are being used for —"2% you are in, 1% your are out”; that relying on national polls rather than state polls "gives an advantage" to candidates with strong name recognition; and that polls in early primary states give a "better sense" of a candidate's political support early in the race than national polls.[43]

By September 24th Gabbard qualified for the October debate by receiving the 4th qualifying poll result at or above 2%[44] after having received 40 poll results at or above 2% overall.

Fundraising

In mid-2017 Gabbard pledged to no longer accept money from political action committees.[45] In October 2018 The Intercept reported that she was one of only four members of Congress who had pledged not to accept corporate campaign donations.[46][47]

In the first quarter of 2019, the campaign raised $4,495,770, with $1,995,770 from individual donations and $2,500,000 transferred from Gabbard's congressional campaign.[48] The campaign has met the polling and the individual donor requirements of the DNC's qualifying criteria for participating in the June and July 2019 debates.[49]

In the second quarter of 2019, the campaign raised $1,567,204 which brings the total to $6,062,974[48] with 69.0% coming from "small dollar" donors giving $200 or less.[50]

Lawsuit against Google

On July 27, Tulsi Now Inc. filed a lawsuit against Google, alleging that the internet technology company suspended the campaign's Google Ads account without reason and that the company had treated the campaign's mail differently than it treated other campaigns' mail. The lawsuit seeks "an injunction against Google from further meddling in the election and damages of at least $50 million."[51]

Media coverage

Gabbard has received very little news coverage relative to her polling position.[52] In addition, much of the coverage she has received campaign has been very negative. In February 2019, shortly after Gabbard's campaign launch, The Intercept's Glenn Greenwald criticized NBC News for attacking Gabbard via discredited sources who previously got caught interfering in the 2017 Alabama Senate election using fabricated data in a false flag information attack.[53] In May 2019, after Gabbard's interview with Joe Rogan[54], Rolling Stone's Matt Taibbi stated, "we have hit a new low in campaign hit pieces" after Gabbard's campaign was attacked by The Daily Beast, CNN and Politico.[55] Following the second presidential debate during which Gabbard exposed her competitor Kamala Harris' record as a prosecutor[56], Sky News' James Morrow stated, the media has "Russia paranoia".[57]

In September 2019, Vanity Fair summarized the media coverage of Gabbard's presidential campaign as "the press hates Gabbard even more than it hates Sanders".[58] Vamsee Juluri, Professor for Media Studies at USF criticized National Public Radio (NPR) for participating in a "bigoted hinduphobic smear campaign" against Gabbard.[59] Gabbard called NPR's interview "very religious bigoted and offensive" for repeating "misinformation, smears and bigoted attacks" from other media.[60] The Hill's Krystal Ball said NPR smeared Gabbard for her religion, her upbringing and her father's views. Ball described the interview as "the most egregious thing I have ever seen" and "much of it based on conspiracy theories". Ball added, this type of interview is the "typical treatment" Gabbard gets in the media because she is "so challenging to the mindset and the bipartisan consensus in Washington". Referring to the overall campaign coverage, Ball said, "people spun up" the accusation, Gabbard were a "Russian plant" and other "crazy nonsense". The Hill's Saagar Enjeti found NPR's interview "disgusting". Both Ball and Enjeti describe Gabbard as "the most unfairly maligned person in Washington".[61]

Military service during campaign

Gabbard left her campaign from August 15–25 to serve with the Hawaii Army National Guard in Indonesia during a joint military training exercise with the Indonesian National Armed Forces.[62]

Polling

Tulsi Gabbard poll results during qualification period for November 2019 debate of the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries

Gabbard has polled in single digits in national polls. Gabbard has polled at 1% in several major polls.[63][64][65] In a poll conducted between July 9 and 18 of registered Democrats in New Hampshire, Gabbard and former Representative Beto O'Rourke were tied in sixth place at 2%.[66] On August 23, 2019, Gabbard's campaign stated that she had received 2% or more in 26 national and statewide polls, but only two of the polls were certified by the DNC.[67]

On August 19, 2019, Gabbard garnered 4.8% of the Iowa State Fair Straw Poll, placing 7th in a field of 24.[68][69][70]

Gabbard received 4% in the early primate states subset of two non-qualifying Morning Consult national polls from August 25 [71] and September 1.[72][73] On September 4 she received 1% in the same states in qualifying polls sponsored by CBS News.

Tulsi Gabbard poll results in New Hampshire

Between the debates of July 31 and September 12, Gabbard's polling results in the early primary state New Hampshire were 1% in one qualifying poll and an average of 4.6% in five non-qualifying polls. Gabbard, who did not qualify for the September debate, received 5% in an August 6 poll from Gravis Marketing[74] and 6% in polls from Emerson College on September 9 [75][76] and HarrisX on September 11, thereby reaching the 4th place in the "Granite state",[77] what PBS NewsHour's Lisa Desjardins called "very significant".[78] Prof. Spencer Kimball, Director of Emerson College Polling, said he is "not surprised" about Gabbard's rise to 6% in the poll because his polling institute has been watching Gabbard "slowly building her support for awhile". Kimball added, Gabbard's military service "likely resonates with a strong military tradition" among New Hampshire voters.[75] Gabbard has been campaigning in New Hampshire during August and September, including a speech at "Politics & Eggs", a forum hosted by the New Hampshire Institute of Politics at Saint Anselm College.[79][80]

Policies

Main article: Political positions of Tulsi Gabbard

Endorsements

Main article: Endorsements in the 2020 Democratic Party presidential primaries § Tulsi Gabbard

References

  1. ^ a b c Strauss, Daniel; Thompson, Alex (January 29, 2019). "Tulsi Gabbard campaign in disarray". Politico.
  2. ^ DeRensis, Hunter (January 14, 2019). "Are the Democrats ready for Tulsi Gabbard?". The National Interest. Retrieved February 18, 2019.
  3. ^ a b Kelly, Caroline. "Rep. Gabbard says she will run for president in 2020". CNN. Retrieved January 11, 2019.
  4. ^ Astor, Maggie (January 11, 2019). "Tulsi Gabbard, Representative From Hawaii, Announces Democratic Presidential Bid". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved August 6, 2019.
  5. ^ Alcindor, Yamiche (February 28, 2016). "Tulsi Gabbard, Rising Democratic Star, Endorses Bernie Sanders". The New York Times. Retrieved January 12, 2019.
  6. ^ Thompson, Alex (October 19, 2018). "Tulsi Gabbard weighing 2020 presidential bid". POLITICO. Retrieved October 20, 2018.
  7. ^ MSNBC, Tulsi Gabbard: "I'm Seriously Considering" Running For President | Hardball | MSNBC, retrieved December 17, 2018
  8. ^ McAvoy, Audrey (January 24, 2019). "Hawaii's Gabbard formally launches campaign for president". Associated Press. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
  9. ^ Bowden, John. "Tulsi Gabbard officially launches 2020 campaign". The Hill. Retrieved February 2, 2019.
  10. ^ "Tulsi Gabbard's Full Speech - Presidential Campaign Launch". 4President.org. 4President Corporation. February 2, 2019. Retrieved August 13, 2019.
  11. ^ Windrem, Robert; Popken, Ben (February 2, 2019). "Russia's propaganda machine discovers 2020 Democratic candidate Tulsi Gabbard". NBC News. Retrieved August 15, 2019.
  12. ^ Shane, Scott; Blinder, Alan (December 19, 2018). "Secret Experiment in Alabama Senate Race Imitated Russian Tactics". The New York Times. Retrieved August 25, 2019.
  13. ^ Greenwald, Glenn (February 3, 2019). "NBC News, to Claim Russia Supports Tulsi Gabbard, Relies on Firm Just Caught Fabricating Russia Data for the Democratic Party". The Intercept. Retrieved August 25, 2019.
  14. ^ Taibbi, Matt (August 9, 2019). "Who's Afraid of Tulsi Gabbard?". Rolling Stone. Retrieved August 9, 2019.
  15. ^ "Tulsi Gabbard Emerges As Most Outspoken Anti-War Candidate in Decades". The Maui Independent. February 20, 2019. Retrieved August 27, 2019. "Our freedoms and democracy are being threatened by media giants ruled by corporate interests who are in the pocket of the establishment war machine," she said. "When journalism is deployed as a weapon against those who call for peace, it threatens our democracy as it seeks to silence debate and dissent, creates an atmosphere of fear and paranoia, and stokes the rhetoric that could lead to nuclear war." {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  16. ^ Cimmino, Jeffrey (February 10, 2019). "Gabbard Attacks the Media in Fundraising Email: 'Media Giants Ruled by Corporate Interests,' In the Pocket of the 'War Machine'". The Washington Free Beacon. Retrieved August 7, 2019.
  17. ^ Cocke, Sophie (July 25, 2019). "Hawaii Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard sues Google for $50 million". Honolulu Star-Advertiser. Honolulu, HI. Retrieved August 7, 2019.
  18. ^ Wang, Amy B (July 28, 2019). "'A different type of vibe': What does Tulsi Gabbard's 2020 run say about America?". The Washington Post. Retrieved August 13, 2019.
  19. ^ Cummings, William (August 1, 2019). "Rep. Tulsi Gabbard is again the most-searched candidate on Google during Democratic debate". USA Today. Retrieved September 2, 2019.
  20. ^ Flynn, Meagan (August 1, 2019). "'You owe them an apology': Gabbard's attack highlights Harris's complex death penalty record". The Washington Post. Retrieved September 2, 2019.
  21. ^ Greenwood, Max; Easley, Jonathan (August 4, 2019). "Harris shows she can take debate punch after Gabbard attack". The Hill. Retrieved September 2, 2019.
  22. ^ Epstein, Reid J. (August 28, 2019). "Democratic Candidates Jostle, and Gripe, as Debates Winnow the Field". The New York Times. Retrieved August 31, 2019.
  23. ^ Prokop, Andrew (August 29, 2019). "Here's the finalized lineup for the September Democratic debate". Vox. Retrieved September 2, 2019.
  24. ^ Axelrod, Tal (August 2, 2019). "Gabbard reaches donor threshold for September debate". The Hill. Retrieved August 31, 2019.
  25. ^ "Tulsi Gabbard's campaign wants the DNC to change debate qualifying poll requirements - Politics News - ABC News Radio". abcnewsradioonline.com. August 23, 2019. Retrieved September 2, 2019.
  26. ^ Spangler, Todd; Aschbrenner, Annah. "As debate lineup solidifies, some 2020 Democrats cry foul over polling requirements". TheStarPress. Retrieved September 2, 2019.
  27. ^ Prince, Molly (August 23, 2019). "Tulsi's 2020 Campaign Urges DNC To Adjust Debate Criteria As She Sits Just Shy Of Qualifying | Daily Wire". www.dailywire.com. Retrieved September 2, 2019. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  28. ^ Aschbrenner, Annah; Wu, Nicholas (August 29, 2019). "Lineup cut in half: Here's who made the third Democratic presidential debate". USA TODAY. Retrieved September 2, 2019. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  29. ^ "Gabbard campaign wants more transparency in Dem debate requirements – Indica News". indicanews.com. Retrieved September 2, 2019.
  30. ^ Santucci, Jeanine (August 29, 2019). "Tulsi Gabbard tells Fox News host Tucker Carlson that DNC debate criteria isn't transparent". USA Today. Retrieved August 29, 2019.
  31. ^ Camp, Frank (August 31, 2019). "WATCH: Rep. Tulsi Gabbard Shreds 'Lack Of Transparency' From DNC That Shut Her Out Of The Next Debate". The Daily Wire. Retrieved September 2, 2019.
  32. ^ Carlson, Tucker (August 28, 2019). "Gabbard: Lack of transparency causing lack of trust in the government". Fox News. Retrieved September 2, 2019.
  33. ^ Quijano, Elaine (August 28, 2019). "Tulsi Gabbard back on the campaign trail". CBS News. Retrieved September 2, 2019.
  34. ^ Quijano, Elaine (August 28, 2019). "Tulsi Gabbard: There's no circumstance where I won't support Democratic nominee". CBS News on YouTube. Retrieved September 2, 2019.
  35. ^ Skelley, Geoffrey (August 26, 2019). "Here's Who's Qualified For The Third Democratic Debate". Fivethirtyeight.com. Retrieved August 31, 2019.
  36. ^ McLaughlin, Seth (August 26, 2019). "Rep. Tulsi Gabbard knocks DNC over debate qualifying rules". Washington Times. Retrieved August 26, 2019. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  37. ^ Jha, Ritu (August 26, 2019). "Gabbard campaign wants more transparency in Dem debate requirements". Indica News. Retrieved August 26, 2019. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)
  38. ^ Tulsi2020 (August 23, 2019). "Tulsi Gabbard's Campaign Calls On the DNC to Ensure Transparency in Debate Requirements". Tulsi2020.com. Retrieved September 2, 2019.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  39. ^ Michael Tracey (August 21, 2019). "Gabbard Victimized by DNC's Dubious Debate Criteria". Real Clear Politics.
  40. ^ "DNC Announces Framework for the 2020 Democratic Presidential Primary Debates". Democrats. December 20, 2018. Retrieved September 3, 2019.
  41. ^ Rupar, Aaron (August 30, 2019). "Tulsi Gabbard vs. the DNC: her complaint about debate exclusion, explained". Vox. Retrieved August 31, 2019.
  42. ^ Skelley, Geoffrey (August 30, 2019). "What If The Third Debate Were Based On Different Polls?". FiveThirtyEight. Retrieved September 3, 2019.
  43. ^ "Poll Hub: Cut the Criteria". Marist Poll. August 30, 2019. Retrieved September 3, 2019.
  44. ^ Stevens, Matt (September 24, 2019). "There Are Now 12 Candidates in the Next Democratic Debate". New York Times. Retrieved September 24, 2019.
  45. ^ Ahmed, Akbar Shahid (January 31, 2019). "Tulsi Gabbard Claims Anti-War Credentials After Accepting Over $100,000 From Arms Dealers". Huffington Post. Retrieved February 21, 2019.
  46. ^ Lacy, Akela (December 2, 2018). "In Democrats' First Bill, There's a Quiet Push to Make Public Campaign Finance a Reality". The Intercept. Retrieved January 22, 2019.
  47. ^ Cohen, Rachel M.; Grim, Ryan (October 14, 2018). "Nearly Every Member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus Still Takes Corporate PAC Money". The Intercept. Retrieved January 22, 2019.
  48. ^ a b "GABBARD, TULSI Candidate for President ID: P00009183". Federal Election Commission. Retrieved August 17, 2019.
  49. ^ Strauss, Daniel; Montellaro, Zach (May 24, 2019). "Jay Inslee hits 65,000-donor threshold to make the Democratic debates". Politico. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
  50. ^ "In 2020 Democratic Fund-Raising, Five Candidates Stand Out". New York Times. July 16, 2019. Retrieved August 17, 2019.
  51. ^ Daisuke Wakabayashi (July 25, 2019). "Tulsi Gabbard, Democratic Presidential Candidate, Sues Google for $50 Million". New York Times. Retrieved July 29, 2019.
  52. ^ Rothschild, Neal; Fischer, Sara (September 3, 2019). "Andrew Yang gets media cold shoulder". Axios. Retrieved October 10, 2019.
  53. ^ Greenwald, Glenn (February 3, 2019). "NBC News, to Claim Russia Supports Tulsi Gabbard, Relies on Firm Just Caught Fabricating Russia Data for the Democratic Party". The Intercept. Retrieved August 17, 2019.
  54. ^ Rogan, Joe (May 13, 2019). "Joe Rogan Experience #1295 - Tulsi Gabbard". Joe Rogan on YoutTube. Retrieved October 10, 2019.
  55. ^ Taibbi, Matt (May 21, 2019). "We've Hit a New Low in Campaign Hit Pieces". Rolling Stone. Retrieved August 17, 2019.
  56. ^ "Gabbard rips Harris' record on criminal prosecutions". CNN. August 1, 2019. Retrieved October 10, 2019.
  57. ^ Morrow, James (August 4, 2019). "Democrat elites tarring Gabbard as a "Russian stooge"". Sky News Australia. Retrieved August 17, 2019.
  58. ^ Frank, T.A. (September 20, 2019). "Veepstakes 2020: Which Democrats Are Secretly Running for Second Place?". Vanity Fair. Retrieved September 30, 2019.
  59. ^ "Today in Hinduphobia: Tulsi Gabbard and NPR". Vamsee Juluri on Youtube. September 25, 2019. Retrieved September 26, 2019.
  60. ^ Young, Robin; Ryan, Jill; McKenna, Kathleen (September 25, 2019). "2020 Hopeful Tulsi Gabbard: The U.S. Needs To 'Stop Acting As The World's Police'". wbur. Retrieved September 26, 2019.
  61. ^ Ball, Krystal; Enjeti, Saagar (September 26, 2019). "Saagar Enjeti: Tulsi's outstanding answer on identity politics". The Hill. Retrieved September 30, 2019.
  62. ^ @TulsiGabbard (August 15, 2019). "#WhyTulsi. While Tulsi is overseas serving in uniform for the next two weeks, let us be her voice and tell the world why we need her to be president. 🙏🏽 -V. #sheserves #tulsi2020" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  63. ^ Blair, Chad (May 22, 2019). "Gabbard Continues To Poll Poorly In Presidential Field". Honolulu Civil Beat. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
  64. ^ "2020 Democratic Presidential Nomination". RealClear Politics. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
  65. ^ Gasparino, Charles; Moynihan, Lydia (May 24, 2019). "Biden, Buttigieg, Gabbard hit Wall Street for money despite class warfare rhetoric". Fox Business. Retrieved May 24, 2019.
  66. ^ Rodrigo, Chris Mills (July 21, 2019). "New CBS poll shows Biden with 7-point lead in New Hampshire". The Hill.
  67. ^ "Tulsi Gabbard's campaign wants the DNC to change debate qualifying poll requirements". ABC News Radio. August 23, 2019. Retrieved September 2, 2019.
  68. ^ Lynch, James (August 19, 2019). "Biden edges Warren in Iowa State Fair straw poll". The Gazette. Retrieved September 10, 2019.
  69. ^ Lynch, James (August 19, 2019). "Biden edges Warren in Iowa State Fair poll". The Courier. Retrieved September 10, 2019.
  70. ^ Howell, Michael (August 19, 2019). "Biden narrowly beats out Warren in State Fair Straw Poll". CBS 2. Retrieved September 10, 2019.
  71. ^ "Political Intelligence" (PDF). Morning Consult. August 26, 2019. Retrieved September 13, 2019.
  72. ^ Griffiths, Shawn (September 4, 2019). "4 Important Take Aways from the IVN 2020 Presidential Survey". Independent Voter News. Retrieved September 13, 2019.
  73. ^ "Political Intelligence" (PDF). Morning Consult. September 3, 2019. Retrieved September 13, 2019.
  74. ^ Halaschak, Zachary (August 13, 2019). "Sanders leads Biden in New Hampshire poll". Washington Examiner. Retrieved September 13, 2019.
  75. ^ a b Graham, Michael (September 10, 2019). "Warren Surges, Sanders Sags in Latest Granite State Poll". NH Journal. Retrieved September 13, 2019.
  76. ^ Kimball, Spencer (September 10, 2019). "Sanders Slips in New Hampshire; Biden, Warren Take Lead". Emerson Polling. Retrieved September 13, 2019.
  77. ^ DiStaso, John (September 12, 2019). "NH Primary Source: Poll for No Labels group shows Biden, Sanders tied in NH". WMUR. Retrieved September 13, 2019.
  78. ^ Nawaz, Amna; Desjardins, Lisa (September 12, 2019). "What's at stake for the 10 candidates in the 3rd Democratic debate". PBS NewsHour. Retrieved September 14, 2019.
  79. ^ Sexton, Adam (September 5, 2019). "Gabbard says she's building momentum in early primary states". Microsoft News. Retrieved September 13, 2019.
  80. ^ "Tulsi Gabbard Answers New Hampshire Voters Questions For An Hour". MOX News on Youtube. September 7, 2019. Retrieved September 13, 2019.

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Tulsi Gabbard presidential campaign, 2020.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tulsi_Gabbard_2020_presidential_campaign&oldid=920547058"