Jump to content

MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 255: Line 255:
== www.pontiart.com ==
== www.pontiart.com ==


* {{LinkSummary|www.pontiart.com}}
* {{LinkSummary|pontiart.com}}
;on en.wp:
;on en.wp:
* {{IP summary|151.19.143.1}}
* {{IP summary|151.19.143.1}}

Revision as of 15:22, 21 April 2020

"Wikipedia:Spam-blacklist" redirects here. For a description of the spam blacklist, see Wikipedia:Spam blacklist. For instructions on administrating the spam blacklist, see Wikipedia:Spam-blacklisting.
    Spam blacklists
    Shortcuts

    Mediawiki:Spam-blacklist is meant to be used by the spam blacklist extension. Unlike the meta spam blacklist, this blacklist affects pages on the English Wikipedia only. Any administrator may edit the spam blacklist. See Wikipedia:Spam blacklist for more information about the spam blacklist.

    Instructions for editors

    There are 4 sections for posting comments below. Please make comments in the appropriate section. These links take you to the appropriate section:

    1. Proposed additions
    2. Proposed removals
    3. Troubleshooting and problems
    4. Discussion

    Each section has a message box with instructions. In addition, please sign your posts with ~~~~ after your comment.

    Completed requests are archived. Additions and removals are logged, reasons for blacklisting can be found there.

    Addition of the templates {{Link summary}} (for domains), {{IP summary}} (for IP editors) and {{User summary}} (for users with account) results in the COIBot reports to be refreshed. See User:COIBot for more information on the reports.

    Instructions for admins
    Any admin unfamiliar with this page should probably read this first, thanks.
    If in doubt, please leave a request and a spam-knowledgeable admin will follow-up.

    Please consider using Special:BlockedExternalDomains instead, powered by the AbuseFilter extension. This is faster and more easily searchable, though only supports whole domains and not whitelisting.

    1. Does the site have any validity to the project?
    2. Have links been placed after warnings/blocks? Have other methods of control been exhausted? Would referring this to our anti-spam bot, XLinkBot be a more appropriate step? Is there a WikiProject Spam report? If so, a permanent link would be helpful.
    3. Please ensure all links have been removed from articles and discussion pages before blacklisting. (They do not have to be removed from user or user talk pages.)
    4. Make the entry at the bottom of the list (before the last line). Please do not do this unless you are familiar with regular expressions — the disruption that can be caused is substantial.
    5. Close the request entry on here using either {{done}} or {{not done}} as appropriate. The request should be left open for a week maybe as there will often be further related sites or an appeal in that time.
    6. Log the entry. Warning: if you do not log any entry you make on the blacklist, it may well be removed if someone appeals and no valid reasons can be found. To log the entry, you will need this number – 952302920 after you have closed the request. See here for more info on logging.


    Proposed additions

    letsdiskuss.com

    spam added by user Itstyagi (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · blacklist hits · AbuseLog · what links to user page · count · COIBot · Spamcheck · user page logs · x-wiki · status · Edit filter search · Google · StopForumSpam)

    Aasim 06:46, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @Awesome Aasim: no Declined, user blocked, lets first see if that gets the message across. --Dirk Beetstra T C 13:57, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Beetstra, mind having another look? There have been several brand-new users adding it (a couple new ones since this report was originally filed), see the COIBot report. creffett (talk) 13:55, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Awesome Aasim and Creffett: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. The block indeed did not get the message through .. --Dirk Beetstra T C 14:10, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    WhatCulture.com

    WhatCulture is most certainly one of the best news sources for information on entertainment. Its credibility is such that we know that its editors "do not need to have any relevant experience or hold any particular qualifications". Seriously, a source like this has no place on any of the Wikimedia projects, yet I see dozens of references to the website in many Wikipedia articles about video games. I do not know of any evidence of spamming, but it is possible, and the overused website really is worthless to Wikimedia. FreeMediaKid! 09:24, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    FreeMediaKid!, if it's unreliable but not being spammed, probably more appropriate to bring this up at the reliable sources noticeboard. creffett (talk) 13:56, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    The thing is that WhatCulture already is considered unreliable. I think the problem is that Wikipedia articles about entertainment and pop culture suffer the most when it comes to the reliability of the sources, and WhatCulture is one of the worst cited sources. Even if it were to not be blacklisted, how can we trust that new editors will correctly discard the source as unreliable? FreeMediaKid! 01:03, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    FreeMediaKid!, regarding "... WhatCulture already is considered unreliable", can you link us to WP:RS/N discussions. If the only given reason is 'it is unreliable' we generally need a strong consensus discussion that states that it basically never should be used as a reference (outside of primary sourcing use, which we then can whitelist) nor as an external link. Dirk Beetstra T C 06:34, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    I see where this is going. Okay, by searching the RSN, I see plenty of instances where WhatCulture has been criticized for its ability to report. I recognize the possibility of confirmation bias interfering with my judgement, so I will have to make sure that my results are balanced if necessary and have due weight. Anyway, by searching "WhatCulture" and "What Culture" in the RSN archives, I find relevant results such as archives 171, 214 and 257. There is a lot less discussion about the source than I would like to admit. The first of the archives is about the website's reporting style ("Top 10s" lists, etc.) and how it gets its own information. The second archive describes it as being polemical, although at least one editor has noted that it is reliable as a source of the author's opinion, but then again, so is every other source. The last of the archives simply repeats familiar statements, but the archives at WP:RSN are not alone. WikiProject Video games considers the website to be unreliable, and so does WikiProject Professional wrestling.
    I recognize that we cannot add every single website to the blacklist, especially if it means that they are valuable to at least a little extent. On the other hand, I had just become aware of Wikipedia's edit filters. I have known about them, but I simply became more aware of them. I probably should have taken the discussion there and posted it rather than here. FreeMediaKid! 10:31, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • I love WhatCulture. I spent probably too much time watching their videos. That said, they're not reliable. "7 Worst Performances by an Oscar winning actor" will be nothing but opinion. Niteshift36 (talk) 12:52, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikibaji spambot

    These are the links being spammed onto account talk pages and a few IP talk pages by Wikibaji spambot accounts.

    The links medium.com and saatchiart.com have also been used by other editors but the rest have no use here.
     — Berean Hunter (talk) 12:32, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @Berean Hunter: plus Added all but the last two to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --
     — Berean Hunter (talk) 12:41, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    medicaltestingsolutions.com

    PPE spam. See COIBot report. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 20:04, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @Suffusion of Yellow: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --— JJMC89 (T·C) 03:24, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    uaecashloans

    Spammers

    Please blacklist.-KH-1 (talk) 00:11, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:29, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    greetingsglobal.com

    Enough is enough. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 19:01, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @Suffusion of Yellow: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --GermanJoe (talk) 19:12, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    india-visa-gov.in

    Systematic spamming for a private visa application site. Note the borderline-fraudulent site name implying government connections, not the first Indian site that uses this cheap tactic. GermanJoe (talk) 10:00, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @GermanJoe: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --GermanJoe (talk) 10:01, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    engineeringunits.com

    Has been going on off and on since 2017. Completely ignores warnings, but changes IPs often enough that it is possible they're just not seeing them. - MrOllie (talk) 15:16, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @MrOllie: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --GermanJoe (talk) 20:46, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    ocnal.com

    ocnal.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

    A tabloid from Albania peddling false and misleading information, ocnal.com is often used to back up some rather proposterous claims on "List of famous Albanians" articles on en.wiki, claiming the likes of George Washington, Alan Shepard and Sandra Bullock as being Albanian. See [1] [2] In fact, calling it a tabloid is probably overly charitable. Clickbaity, sensationalistic headlines and no editorial oversight whatsoever. Claims like the George Washington one are clearly fake news, as described by this independent fact-checking organization. Blacklisting ocnal.com would stop a good 80% of the fake news vandalism to articles such as Mary Ball Washington, List of Albanian Americans, etc. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 16:32, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Amanuensis Balkanicus, has there been any discussion about this source and its reliability in other forums like WP:RSN? We usually do not blacklist sites for reliability concerns, unless a community discussion with a clear consensus asks for it. If you haven't yet, I would recommend to start a general discussion about this site on such a noticeboard. GermanJoe (talk) 05:54, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Sieukeo

    Link
    Spammers

    Please blacklist. -KH-1 (talk) 23:01, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Useless blog that violates copyright policy, user continuing to add after warnings. Guy (help!) 08:37, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @JzG: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:08, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    bibloteka.com

    See COIBot report. SEO spam from over dozen IPs and users over the past year. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 20:11, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @Suffusion of Yellow: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:09, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    getassist.net

    See COIBot report. Four socks and counting. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 20:24, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @Suffusion of Yellow: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:11, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    indiae-visa.com

    See COIBot report. Recurring spam, previous blocks have been ignored. The case is a bit stale, but such sites usually come back again. GermanJoe (talk) 05:22, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @GermanJoe: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --GermanJoe (talk) 05:26, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    bdgovtjobs.com

    See COIBot report. Recurring spam, previous blocks have been ignored. GermanJoe (talk) 05:22, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @GermanJoe: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --GermanJoe (talk) 05:28, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    As enwiki does not seem to use global blacklist, I propose to add links mentioned (and accepted) here: m:Special:PermanentLink/19809308#Links used for self-promotion by LTA Alex9777777 (aka Aleksej Pechkurov). Lovifm.com popped up today here: Category:LFM music charts. --jdx Re: 12:50, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

     Comment: I have just noticed in the source of the mentioned category that he typed [http://ℒoviℱm.com ℒoviℱm.com], what, IMO strangely, links to lovifm.com. --jdx Re: 13:08, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    thelawmentor.org

    While the website doesn't look that bad (though probably not especially reliable), it appears to be getting added to a number of articles by IP editors in what is probably an attempt at SEO - since the website says that it was only started in November 2019, I'm guessing that they're trying to increase their visibility. creffett (talk) 13:18, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @Creffett: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. Obvious spam. --GermanJoe (talk) 14:16, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    khojinindia.com

    Continued spam for a so-called "business directory", several blocks and warnings have been ignored. GermanJoe (talk) 14:41, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @GermanJoe: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --GermanJoe (talk) 14:44, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    News NT

    As described here, News NT is a website that frequently republishes articles from other news outlets in violation of copyright regulations. Requesting that this site be blacklisted in compliance with the COPYLINK policy. ToThAc (talk) 15:26, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    houseofamericancars.com

    See COIBot report. Spammed by a /16 range and multiple single-purpose accounts over the past two years. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 00:25, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @Suffusion of Yellow: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:47, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    worldgreynews.com

    See COIBot report. "Fake news generator" used as a "source" by vandals. Apparently fooled a few good-faith editors, too. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 01:48, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @Suffusion of Yellow: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --Dirk Beetstra T C 07:20, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    prescriptiondoctor.com

    Per COIBot report - spammed by IPs. creffett (talk) 13:04, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    csibioinfo.nus.edu.sg/csingsportal

    Only ever used by Omeran (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) for spamming and block evasion, including via webhost proxy servers (121.7.77.179, 46.229.172.165, 46.229.173.245). ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:25, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @MrOllie: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:32, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    csibioinfo.nus.edu.sg

    Blacklist entry a few sections up (csibioinfo.nus.edu.sg/csingsportal) is too specific to be effective, being circumvented by the linkspammer here MrOllie (talk) 02:35, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    MrOllie, please have a look at the other specific links they add, we may need to eradicate all. Dirk Beetstra T C 04:38, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Beetstra, so far as I'm aware it is just this and https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/201910.0146/v2 - but I imagine if we were to blacklist the preprints link they'd just upload it somewhere else or get a new upload number at preprints. I'm also noting here that User:Omeran's contrib links no longer work because the account was globally renamed to User:EasyCheesy at meta. - MrOllie (talk) 11:31, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    MrOllie, I saw some specific dois I think, and indeed that preprints link, We could grab those as well, if they then want to change link we can just block-and-ban them on sight.
    Lets get some reports. Dirk Beetstra T C 14:07, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    express-cleaning-supplies.co.uk

    3 warnings have been ignored, strike 4. Multiple recurring spam since November 2019. GermanJoe (talk) 14:48, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @GermanJoe: plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --GermanJoe (talk) 14:49, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    hindienglishstories.in

    Spammed by multiple IP editors, see COIBot report. There were a handful of instances on hiwiki as well, wasn't sure if that was enough to request a global blacklisting, but I can do so if you all think that would be more appropriate. creffett (talk) 01:19, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    note-unreliable fringe history site

    realhistoryww.com/index.htm -- a cursory look at the introductory page should give administration all they need to know about blacklisting this POV/fringe website - can someone more familiar with the process run with this 'dog'? thanks 50.111.14.1 (talk) 00:08, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    www.pontiart.com

    on en.wp
    on it/wp

    Commercial gallery spamming links to its own promotional materials. Now using a different IP for each edit, so definitely not a good-faith contributor. Range-blocking does not seem to be a possibility. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:56, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Proposed removals

    docdroid.net

    docdroid.net: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

    After working on the Timeline for asexual history, I had to enlist some help on finding any link for the chapter "The Sexually Oppressed" by Myra Johnson for the book "Asexual and Autoerotic Women: Two Invisible Groups" published by Harvey L. and Jean S. Gochros in 1977. After 2 hours of Google search, I came up empty. Nothing. Someone "scanned" the chapter I needed with their phone and uploaded it to the above site. Now, I am not asking for the entire site to be unblacklisted, just one link. That's all I am requesting.

    There isn't another version out there from the mountain of online sources because I have looked. Though if you all want to give it a shot, feel free. :) If you all find a link I can use for that chapter, pages 96 to 107, I'll be happy to use it. But for right now, this is it. It's all I'm asking. Thanks...Neutralhomer • Talk • 09:18 on April 16, 2020 (UTC) • #StayAtHome

    @Neutralhomer: no Declined,  Defer to Whitelist for specific links on this domain. If you just want to get a single link in this domain whitelisted, please use MediaWiki_talk:Spam-whitelist#Proposed_additions_to_Whitelist_(web_pages_to_unblock), and specify the exact link to be whitelisted - if it's not a copyright violation ('someone "scanned" the chapter'). --GermanJoe (talk) 21:37, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Okie dokie, I can do that. Thanks for taking a look.  :) - Neutralhomer • Talk • 22:00 on April 19, 2020 (UTC) • #StayAtHome

    hindupad.com

    hindupad.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com This domain contains biographical information on Hindu religious figures that could aid Wikipedia articles, such as Jyotirmayananda Saraswati Eternal Father (talk) 06:23, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @Eternal Father: no Declined, the domain has been repeatedly spammed in the past, cannot be considered a reliable source and is involved in a long-term "sockpuppet" issue with an editor who evades their block by repeatedly creating new accounts. Such cases will generally remain on blacklist. GermanJoe (talk) 07:02, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    maketheswitch.com.au

    maketheswitch.com.au: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com The domain/website is full of media reviews, and particularly has some good reviews for films screened at festivals in Australia which may not be covered in much other media - useful for sourcing information on those films and the critical response of the website. It was blacklisted just over a year ago because of an IP spamming it in leads, but since it was always coverage of the article subject they could just have been misguided... The IP got blocked, anyway, so I doubt the issue will recur. Kingsif (talk) 23:49, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @Kingsif: ".. because of an IP spamming it" & "The IP got blocked ...". First of all, I see three IPs, none of them blocked, and an editor (who is blocked). no Declined. --Dirk Beetstra T C 15:07, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    census2011.co.in

    census2011.co.in: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com This site has accurate information for cities, town, and villages from the 2011 Census of India that is hard to locate on the official pdf, so its use in many village articles is legitimate in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 19:29, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @Atlantic306: no Declined, this is not the official census of India, it is unreliable. It just repackages material from the official census data. Please use the official census data. --Dirk Beetstra T C 14:15, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Logging / COIBot Instructions

    Blacklist logging

    Full instructions for admins


    Quick reference

    For Spam reports or requests originating from this page, use template {{/request|0#section_name}}

    • {{/request|213416274#Section_name}}
    • Insert the oldid 213416274 a hash "#" and the Section_name (Underscoring_spaces_where_applicable):
    • Use within the entry log here.

    For Spam reports or requests originating from Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam use template {{WPSPAM|0#section_name}}

    • {{WPSPAM|182725895#Section_name}}
    • Insert the oldid 182725895 a hash "#" and the Section_name (Underscoring_spaces_where_applicable):
    • Use within the entry log here.
    Note: If you do not log your entries, it may be removed if someone appeals the entry and no valid reasons can be found.

    Addition to the COIBot reports

    The lower list in the COIBot reports now have after each link four numbers between brackets (e.g. "www.example.com (0, 0, 0, 0)"):

    1. first number, how many links did this user add (is the same after each link)
    2. second number, how many times did this link get added to wikipedia (for as far as the linkwatcher database goes back)
    3. third number, how many times did this user add this link
    4. fourth number, to how many different wikipedia did this user add this link.

    If the third number or the fourth number are high with respect to the first or the second, then that means that the user has at least a preference for using that link. Be careful with other statistics from these numbers (e.g. good user who adds a lot of links). If there are more statistics that would be useful, please notify me, and I will have a look if I can get the info out of the database and report it. This data is available in real-time on IRC.

    Poking COIBot

    When adding {{LinkSummary}}, {{UserSummary}} and/or {{IPSummary}} templates to WT:WPSPAM, WT:SBL, WT:SWL and User:COIBot/Poke (the latter for privileged editors) COIBot will generate linkreports for the domains, and userreports for users and IPs.


    Discussion

    Some words

    I have some words to say: I tried to add in two sources, but there's error due to this ' Spam blacklist'. How should I settle this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manwë986 (talk • contribs) 14:04, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @Manwë986: I am sorry, without any information on which sources you want to add and why there is not much we can do here. Please read the instructions at the top of this page and request in the appropriate subsection on this page. --Dirk Beetstra T C 11:09, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Protected edit request on 7 April 2020

    Hi, I am trying to add some exyernal link to from arrestedworld.com which is blocked kindly remove fron the block list. So i can contribute some valvable infromation to wikipedi. Sumansuman 122 (talk) 08:12, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    @Sumansuman 122: please read the instructions at the top of this page, and then request it with the information that is requested in the appropriate subsection on this page. --Dirk Beetstra T C 11:05, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    Archive bot

    Seems like the archive bot has some problems with this page since 23 March, anyone has an idea why? I removed some stray text that may confuse it, but I doubt that was the cause. GermanJoe (talk) 10:16, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    GermanJoe, this. I should clean up for the bot .. Dirk Beetstra T C 14:21, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    GermanJoe, done (for this page) Dirk Beetstra T C 14:23, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    GermanJoe, and done for the rest that the archive bot did not like. Dirk Beetstra T C 15:04, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Beetstra, thank you for checking this. Next time I know to look into the log (unless I forget it again of course ...). GermanJoe (talk) 17:04, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Fixed 2 more instances, that should hopefully do it for now. GermanJoe (talk) 15:04, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist&oldid=952302920"