Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions nor to address the pending deletion of any page.

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions on the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

float

float

Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

ERGO

• ERGO · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Please UNdelete ERGO wikipedia page. It was deleted by speedy deletion. Did not have opportunity to revisit the page until now, to make edits to the ERGO page (U.S. non-profit organization), only to find it was deleted. Will re-edit page so it is 'acceptable" to the community. Thanks. -SilverLiner (talk) 01:49, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

•  Not done Any articles will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Non-profits by themselves may be noble, but with assertion of notability, they may not meet the requirements for Wikipedia. I would suggest creating a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT, and then checking with the deleting admin before proceeding (✉→BWilkins←✎) 10:08, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
• Understood. Could you please MOVE the deleted ERGO Wikipedia page -AND- the deleted Euthanasia Research & Guidance Organization Wikipedia page to the SilverLiner userspace. Then some can contribute edits and repair the contents so the page conforms to Wikipedia community guidelines. I would not request such if a copy of the deleted page content was available. Thanks. SilverLiner (talk) 00:45, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

•  Already done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:40, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Bryan Baker (musician)

• Bryan Baker (musician) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:BB.BBMusic&diff=0&oldid=466878035

We are very unclear as to the deletion of this very accurate and documented Wiki page for the acclaimed jazz musician and author, Bryan Baker. Our agency hired a professional copywriter skilled in Wiki content to create and upload the Wiki for this artist and all content, dates, awards recordings performances are 100% true and correct. Please advise as to how we can recreate the page or make the necessary corrections. -24.255.43.214 (talk) 16:33, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

The page was deleted because it was promotional. It selectively quoted praise to give a good impression. Wikipedia is actually an encyclopedia and so needs a different kind of writing. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:28, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Not done and will not be done Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Bryan Baker (musician). While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Whoever you hired was not skilled or professional, and has been blocked. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:07, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

And who is "we"? --Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:41, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Send "them" to WP:NAY. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 09:56, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Please UNDELETE ERGO Wikipedia page

• ERGO · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Hi. I've sent previous request that ERGO page be UNdeleted and did not hear back.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ERGO

ERGO is a U.S. non-profit organization. Please inform when page is UNdeleted then will help edit to conform to wikipedia community guidelines. Please do respond or please post who this request should be forwarded to. Thanks. -SilverLiner (talk) 22:04, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

• Please MOVE the deleted ERGO Wikipedia page -AND- the deleted Euthanasia Research & Guidance Organization Wikipedia page to the SilverLiner userspace. Then some can contribute edits and repair the contents so the page conforms to Wikipedia community guidelines. I would not request such if a copy of the deleted page content was available. Thanks. SilverLiner (talk) 00:49, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Please UNDELETE Euthanasia Research & Guidance Organization Wikipedia page

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euthanasia_Research_%26_Guidance_Organization

The Euthanasia Research & Guidance Organization is a U.S. non-profit organization. Please inform when page is UNdeleted then will help edit the page to conform to wikipedia community guidelines. Please do respond or please post who this request should be forwarded to. Thanks. -SilverLiner (talk) 22:06, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

• Please MOVE the deleted ERGO Wikipedia page -AND- the deleted Euthanasia Research & Guidance Organization Wikipedia page to the SilverLiner userspace. Then some can contribute edits and repair the contents so the page conforms to Wikipedia community guidelines. I would not request such if a copy of the deleted page content was available. Thanks. SilverLiner (talk) 00:50, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

•  Already done to User:SilverLiner/ERGO by User:Worm That Turned. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:39, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Marcwebbdirector.jpg

• File:Marcwebbdirector.jpg · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I had a administrator that recommended me to request in this page that the image on the fact that the image did more than simply "show a camera", but instead showed a notable director himself working with the camera in one of it's first use in a feature film... and explain that the deleting admin inadvertantly erred in that THAT depiction has no free equivalent, which suggests that the deleting admin might not have read the expanded FUR. I could also not find a substitute for such a image for the filming section like the guidelines they reference should suggest. Jhenderson ⁷⁷⁷ 01:49, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

That admin was me. The question in NFCC #1 on which deletion relied is "Could the subject be adequately conveyed by properly sourced text without using the non-free content at all?" What was overlooked in the speedy was that the argument for its use was not that it was simply a picture of a camera (which would have been likely replacable by a free image), but rather that it was an image showing a notable director actually using a specific camera in its first-time-use-ever in a feature film. In looking for citable sources toward this specific circumstance myself, I was unable to find any that dealt with the instance... making the image unique in its conveyance of information for our readers. Simply put, and included in the FUR, the image provided encyclopedic information that could not be replaced by properly sourced text. I too, request its refund. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 09:48, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Bisi Ezerioha

• PageName · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -96.229.4.199 (talk) 22:32, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

This is a viable article on an individual that has contributed significantly to motorsports. Please restore. Thank you. Nnadozie.

• Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. see Bisi Ezerioha Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:11, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

tokyo industries

• Tokyo Industries · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I placed a page listing the operations of what a company Tokyo Industries (a UK company does) it was not advertising more informative stating teh companies origins and operations - I am unclear why this was deleted many sites have information on business - why can mine not be listed -Aaronmellor (talk) 22:41, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

• • Actually your article was at Tokyo Industries (a company) · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]. It was deleted for no claim of importance, rather than for advertising. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:08, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sir_fritzgerald_3rd/Loveboat_(band)

• Loveboat (band) · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

my atricale was set to userfy so i could improve it and add genuine references and links, and to also improve general layout, i believe i have done this now and would like it to be resubmitted. I still have some edits to make, but the BBC need a wikipedia link for their website asap. many thanks (Sir fritzgerald 3rd (talk) 08:59, 3 July 2012 (UTC)) -Sir fritzgerald 3rd (talk) 08:59, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Can you explain how it meets the WP:BAND requirement? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:14, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Yes, BBC radio coverage Radio 6 , A BBC Radio profile on the band, published releases. Direct work related links to notable musicians/radio DJ's. Also, the Musicians in the article for the band in question already have a band page for things they did in the past which was accepted on lesser notability? Rumpus (band) also if you look at that link you'l see that Danny Lowe Also is a member of british band Babybird. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sir fritzgerald 3rd (talk • contribs) 10:50, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

this band contains founding members of bands that already have submitted pages, Rumpus (band) and Babybird (see article) They are also linked to BBC radio 6 and Steve Lamacq (see article) also Jon Mcclure from the band Reverend and the makers has had some involvement with this band (see article) They have been given a BBC radio 6 web page now which has been correctly referenced (see article and reference link) This also proves they are being played on a notable radio station. Many thanks(Sir fritzgerald 3rd (talk) 12:31, 3 July 2012 (UTC)) -Sir fritzgerald 3rd (talk) 12:31, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

OK I have moved it, see how long it lasts, please add more references! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:54, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

User:Lanthanum-138

• User:Lanthanum-138 · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

My old username and userpage. Could someone please restore the history so that I may have better ideas for my current userpage? Thanks. Double sharp (talk) 14:49, 3 July 2012 (UTC) -Double sharp (talk) 14:49, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

• Done Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Ruger_Red_Label

• Ruger_Red_Label · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

deletion justification states that it is for "Article about a company, corporation, organization, or group, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject", however, the page would not (or should not) have been about the Ruger corporation, but rather a specific shotgun it manufactures called the "Red Label" which was continuously manufactured for more than 30 years and has at least as much significance as other Ruger firearms which are more heavily documented @ Wikipedia. w/o page history available cannot review content for value or validity. Was unable to contact Administrator who deleted, who has apparently been suspended for > 1 year inactivity. -71.191.131.98 (talk) 21:25, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

• Done Please expand this! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:41, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doby_Daenger

• Doby Daenger · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

don't know why it was deleted -76.87.98.221 (talk) 22:21, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

• Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Doby_Daenger, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 22:32, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

jasmine dustin

• Jasmine Dustin · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

reasoning -Losangelestoppr (talk) 23:04, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

I represent Jasmine Dustin and she is a well known model as well as staring in her own Reality show called "Doheny Models:

• Not only WP:COI, but Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasmine Dustin, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 23:11, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Jermel Wilson

I am a professional actor affiliated with SAG-AFTRA and my credits can be verified on imdb and my other articles on the web I need the imdb for further promotion of my career and it should never been deleted my IMDB link is http://www.imdb.me/jermelwilson if you want to verify this information — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jermel23 (talk • contribs) 20:09, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Jermel Wilson was born in Brooklyn, New York. As a child, Jermel was fascinated by art and performing arts. He started out his acting career in high school in his senior year. Jermel has appeared in such films as A Guide To Recognizing Your Saints (2006), Fighting (2009), MTV's Yo Momma Season 2 promo. Jermel is also an inspiring rapper also know as Franky Steel and Starting his own entertainment company called Focus Mindz Entertainment which specializes in Music, Film, Television and New Media. He is still pursuing his career in entertainment and is an great asset to any production he is apart of.

http://www.imdb.me/jermelwilson preceding unsigned comment added by Jermel23 (talk • contribs) 20:09, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning people. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning people will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Please do not write an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Jermel Wilson. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:26, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Now moot since the user has gone ahead and recreated the autobiography, which is up for speedy. Hairhorn (talk) 00:49, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Mobli

• Mobli · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Just want an emailed copy for this page I'm about to create. Thanks again. -Marcus Qwertyus 20:38, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Not worth emailing: the entire text of the deleted page (arranged as four lines) was: "Mobli, Photo Sharing APP / See the world through other peoples eyes. / www.mobli.com / Founder, Moshe Hogeg 2010". JohnCD (talk) 21:30, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

 Already done as per above (✉→BWilkins←✎) 14:24, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Beate Bille (actress)

• Beate Bille (actress) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

A well-known Danish actress[1] and Shooting Star laureate[2][3], was deleted without due process/discussion. The article has 3 interwikis, i.e. articles in Danish, German and Norwegian. Kimiya2 (talk) 21:42, 5 July 2012 (UTC) -Kimiya2 (talk) 21:42, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Tgeairn (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days to which you could contribute. You need to add references to the article showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to establish notability, see also WP:NACTOR. IMDb is not considered a reliable source; nor are other Wikipedias; the other articles do not seem any better sourced than this one. Most of the article is about her famous family and ancestors, but (a) all that is unsourced, and WP:BLP says that unsourced information about living persons should be removed, and (b) notability is not inherited. JohnCD (talk) 22:08, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

DoggyRide

• DoggyRide · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

reasoning -192.168.0.104 (talk) 4:40, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

This is a viable article on a pioneering and market leading that created a new outdoors experience. Please restore. It will be further updated. Thank you. Matthys.

• Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DoggyRide (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user The Bushranger (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. GB fan 04:56, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

10ticks

• 10ticks · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

deleted on basis business has no notability when references clearly follow wikipedia's guidelines of notability -80.46.99.136 (talk) 13:14, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

 Not done Although this was deleted via a community discussion, you should note that User:Black Kite "userfied" it in order to try and work on it. You should contact them if you wish to assist. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 14:23, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Subaru Impreza WRX STI

• Subaru Impreza WRX STI · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The article for the Subaru Impreza WRX STI and the Subaru Impreza WRX were both removed with no apparent warning or reasoning. I, along with many believe the articles are filled with valuable information usable in many situations. I use both to teach up and coming car enthusiasts. The Subaru Impreza page has appeared to become a merge of the three, but it is lacking the information required. Thanks for your time. -124.148.47.113 (talk) 01:21, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Not done - this page has not yet been deleted.This has not actually been deleted, but instead merged to Subaru Impreza (second generation). You can read the old version at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Subaru_Impreza_WRX_STI&oldid=496386861 and you can even put it back to this version without administrator action. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:38, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Alexander Joseph

• Alexander Joseph · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

reasoning -117.207.238.60 (talk) 05:57, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

He is named as one of the Directors of Kerala Institute of Medical Sciences (KIMS), one of Asia's leading tertiary care hospitals.

http://www.kimskerala.com/LeadershipTeam.aspx

Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Joseph, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Ron Ritzman (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:34, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Castrol Driver Rankings

• Castrol Driver Rankings · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

because it was the only way to get any from of archived Rankings results and to build up records of no. of weeks at top -87.127.64.8 (talk) 08:50, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

• Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Castrol Driver Rankings, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 09:32, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Neuronix LTD.

• Neuronix LTD. · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

I would like you to restore my page so I can change it -Tchaen (talk) 14:08, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

•  Not done As this "article" had significant copyright issues, it cannot be undeleted. If you are not related to the subject in any way, you may try to create a draft or use articles for creation to draft an article that meets reliable sources, notbility (especially under WP:CORP), and is in no way promotional (✉→BWilkins←✎) 14:10, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Nutanix

• Nutanix · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

The article on Nutanix was appropriately deleted because someone had written a hoax story back in 2010. We at Nutanix want to start a genuine page on Nutanix, but this deleted article is coming in the way. How do we recreate our page? -Nutanix (talk) 06:15, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. however you should not be editing this to make a promotion. see WP:COI. Also your user should be representing you as a person, and not a company, so I urge you to sign up with a personal account instead before you are blocked. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:31, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Mark Charan Newton

• Mark Charan Newton · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch | afd ) · [revisions]

uncontested deletion -Apoorv020 (talk) 08:06, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

The article is about a living person, an author, and was speedy deleted back in 2009 based on notability. I recreated the article in 2010, but in 2011, the article was deleted again based on this original deletion. Nobody else seems to have participated in the deletion process, so I request the article be undeleted to allow me to address these concerns. At the very least, can I get a copy of the article which I can improve in my own namespace.

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at user:Apoorv020/Mark Charan Newton. An AFD was started but never closed by consensus, so if you actually have a claim of importance and independent references there is a chance of survival. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:26, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Terrence Ingram

• Terrence Ingram · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]

Deleted via speedy deletion, failure to indicate why it is significant.

Would you please undelete this article. It's about a notable author, researcher, and activist. There are numerous verified sources in the original article, linking to his publications, as well as the recent news coverage of his interactions with the Department of Agriculture. I will clean up if needed, but I'm unsure how someone with numerous books, articles, and significant activity to help save the bald eagle would be considered insignificant. - — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎Thalia42 (talk • contribs)

 Not done No, there were no such links ... some google searches that didn't really show anything, and a link to a photobook on Amazon. Indeed, there's little claim to notability whatsoever, which led to its deletion. You might want to try making a wP:USERSPACEDRAFT or use the Articles for Creation process, but read WP:FIRSTARTICLE before starting. (Just a by-the-way: there are more bald eagles in Ear Falls, Ontario than in all of the US .... they don't need all that much saving) (✉→BWilkins←✎) 10:48, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Would you please send it to my sandbox in that case. FWIW, the bald eagle was on the threatened species list in 1967, and the population rebuilt after DDT was banned. Ingram's research was on the effects of DDT cumulatively, back in the 1960s. Citing today's numbers on the bald eagle is irrelevant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thalia42 (talk • contribs) 19:12, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Thalia42/Terrence Ingram. LadyofShalott 19:36, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

world wide pharmacy association

• PageName · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -Mexicanreporter (talk) 00:22, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

I believe the World Wide Pharmacy Association should not have been deleted. It sells nothing, it advertises nothing and is a group of professional pharmacy owners from around the world that are licensed and agree to only sell valid Medications. Their members get to use the association seals on their web pages. This group also donates to the poor in Mexico with free medication.

Rejected. Bad faith request: See WikiProject Spam report. Undeletion rationale demonstrates no understanding of Wikipedia's mission. Finally, the nominator did not create the deleted page -- Vanburrena (talk · contribs) did, which is indicative of sockpuppetry. MER-C 10:39, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vanburrena. MER-C 10:47, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Philippe Argouarch

• PageName · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -Argouarch (talk) 10:31, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

My biography that some one had written on me on french wikipedia has been unfairly deleted following false accusations on minor details in a wiki discussion. I am asking the undeletion of this wikipedia entry. Will check all the facts and will source them if they are not__Thanks, Philippe Argouarch

•  Not done We have no jurisdiction over the French Wikipedia (✉→BWilkins←✎) 12:55, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Sharis

• Sharis · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

article represents important facts about the company Sharis; article was proposed for deletion -195.243.30.228 (talk) 12:53, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

• In this case, even though it was a PROD, Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 12:56, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Mad Gringo hot Sauce

• PageName · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -99.239.14.180 (talk) 21:00, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Someone wrote an article about me and my small business and I noticed it was deleted I have been in the newspaper on television and put a lot of hard work into pursuing my dreams in this terrible economy.

It's not advertising at all I have press sources to back me up and I do a lot of good work in my community.

How can Unilever Monsanto and other large corporations that are destroying the very fabric of our civilized way of life be accepted yet The underdog small business people are trampled on and rejected as not valid (written by 99.239.14.180 (talk · contribs))

Deeds of large companies have nothing to do with the deletion of Mad Gringo Hot Sauce. Although the promotional style of writing could have been fixed, there was also no claim of importance in the deleted page. Since you are involved in the topic, I suggest that if you want to write about it you use WP:AFC to create it, with a list of newspaper references, and then expand by saying what they wrote about. If Jordan Engman has had more coverage, then an article could be written on that person. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:17, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Medicina Mexico

• Medicina Mexico · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

reasoning -Samuelmeza (talk) 08:51, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

I was placed in charge of writing a new article that meets the standards of Wikipedia. I will make sure that no unauthoized linkage takes place and their exists no spam.

Thank you

Samuelmeza (talk) 08:51, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

 Not done Well just write it again from scratch. All that was left was from Mexicanreporter "Medicina Mexico is a pharmaceutical corporation in Mexico. They opened their first pharmacy in 1974 in Tijuana, Mexico. Medicina Mexico currently owns 43 pharmacies in Baja California, in their headquarters city Tijuana, Tecate, Mexicali and Ensenada" However it was deleted as a hoax. Does this really exist? If you can find it in newspapers etc, then please provide references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:43, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

... and the BS in ANI related to this topic isn't helping the case either - quite the opposite, actually. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 10:57, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

To Graeme Bartlett: I got a copy however, you are RIGHT, I checked and the source used only refect the current days page of the newspapers. I see I have a lot of work to do to correct this. I will make sure that the new article points to the actual articles in the newspapers. They are real. If you want copies of their licenses I will be happy to provide them. My schedule is real busy for the next two days due to routing problems at our datacenter. I will pass my article to you to check and verify prior to moving it if that is ok with you. Thank you

Samuel Samuelmeza (talk) 11:31, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Samuelmeza has been blocked as a sock, impersonator and spammer - see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vanburrena --bonadea contributions talk 11:56, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

10ticks

• 10ticks · ( talk | logs | links | watch | afd | afd2 ) · [revisions]

Page has been deleted even though it contravenes to all wikipedia guidelines of notability. -80.46.99.136 (talk) 14:53, 10 July 2012 (UTC)