Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
JohnCD (talk | contribs)
130,355 edits
Line 507: Line 507:
Popularity of Producer in Independent Film Festivals and in China increased since 2006 -[[Special:Contributions/70.79.87.53|70.79.87.53]] ([[User talk:70.79.87.53|talk]]) 13:01, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Popularity of Producer in Independent Film Festivals and in China increased since 2006 -[[Special:Contributions/70.79.87.53|70.79.87.53]] ([[User talk:70.79.87.53|talk]]) 13:01, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
:<!-- Begin Template:UND -->[[File:X mark.svg|18px]] '''Not done''' - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a [[Wikipedia:Deletion discussions|deletion discussion]]. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place&nbsp;at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kai Wong (2nd nomination)]], it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the [[WP:administrator|administrator]] who closed the discussion, user {{user1|MBisanz}}. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]].<!-- End Template:UND - afd - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kai Wong (2nd nomination) - MBisanz --> [[User:Yunshui|Yunshui]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Yunshui|<span style="font-size:110%">雲</span>]]&zwj;[[Special:Contributions/Yunshui|<span style="font-size:110%">水</span>]] 13:09, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
:<!-- Begin Template:UND -->[[File:X mark.svg|18px]] '''Not done''' - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a [[Wikipedia:Deletion discussions|deletion discussion]]. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place&nbsp;at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kai Wong (2nd nomination)]], it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the [[WP:administrator|administrator]] who closed the discussion, user {{user1|MBisanz}}. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at [[Wikipedia:Deletion review|deletion review]].<!-- End Template:UND - afd - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kai Wong (2nd nomination) - MBisanz --> [[User:Yunshui|Yunshui]]&nbsp;[[User talk:Yunshui|<span style="font-size:110%">雲</span>]]&zwj;[[Special:Contributions/Yunshui|<span style="font-size:110%">水</span>]] 13:09, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

== Kai Christophe Wong ==

*{{revisions|Kai Christophe Wong}}
merged with Kai Wong page in an earlier incorrect version. -[[Special:Contributions/70.79.87.53|70.79.87.53]] ([[User talk:70.79.87.53|talk]]) 13:19, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:19, 6 December 2013


Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request diirectly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions on the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases
float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

File:Onsert.jpg

Was moved to commons, who have since deleted it because it contains an image of a copyrighted work; no fair-use rationale is available on commons -Josh Parris 09:30, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • So what is your fair use rationale? This is obviously not public domain. The source however is evident from the picture, so a di-nosource is not appropriate. However it is not licensed freely. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:51, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Are you talking of the newspaper or the image not licensed freely? I'm unable to see the licensing information, but as the uploader I imagine I would have PD'd it - however, it was a long time ago. The image is not to illustrate the newspaper, but the onsert placed upon it; The image meets all of the fair use criteria:
    1. No free equivalent. Onserts are only placed onto commercial, copyrighted publications
    2. Respect for commercial opportunities. The newspaper issue in question is many years gone; there is no commerical loss to the publisher
    3. Minimal usage:
      1. Minimal number of items. One newspapers.
      2. Minimal extent of use. Only the above the fold part.
    4. Previous publication. The newspaper issue in question is many years gone
    5. Content. The image is educational, illustrating an article.
    6. Media-specific policy. Image meets Wikipedia:Image use policy.
    7. One-article minimum. used in onsert
    8. Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. Check.
    9. Restrictions on location. used in onsert
    10. Image description page. Photograph of an onsert advertising Microsoft Office in The Age on 2006-06-01
    Also, OTHERSTUFFEXISTS (I know), but look: File:Newsstand.jpg has plenty of copyrighted works depicted. It's on commons. Josh Parris 00:00, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Seems reasonable to undelete. Requester is original uploader and I have added the page description from the deleted revision. MBisanz talk 05:26, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:SVUopening.jpg

This file should have better revisions, does it? -George Ho (talk) 07:19, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There are 4 deleted revisions: 638 × 480 of poor quality; 589 × 360 good; 463 × 284 ok; 282 × 173 a bit small. I would suggest that you want 589 × 360 if the current one is too small. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:56, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ct classic to modern automobile repairs

reasoning -Flaounas 5 (talk) 08:22, 29 November 2013 (UTC) So people can find it[reply]

Not done. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a business listing directory. This article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 11:09, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

itrnsfr

reasoning -Itrnsfr (talk) 15:18, 29 November 2013 (UTC) This article meets general criteria doesn't violate any copyrights. It's been created to help readers get the maximum benefits of the website[reply]

Not done The page was not deleted because of a copyright violation. It was deleted under sections A7 and G11 of the speedy deletion criteria, because the subject did not appear to be notable, and because the text read like an advertisment. Yunshui 雲‍水 16:15, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Albeu

Albeu (talk) 19:45, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/IMS-21

I, 76.178.209.48, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 76.178.209.48 (talk) 20:32, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alamitos Bay Marina

I would like to see what was there and possibly merge some of the content. If it's short maybe it can be copied or if it's significant I would like it moved to my userspace. Candleabracadabra (talk) 01:30, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done It had a corrupted info box, a list of services from http://www.dbw.ca.gov/maps/facilityinfo.asp?facilityID=1172 and a copyright infringement from http://www.longbeach.gov/park/marine/alamitos_bay.asp. So I won't restore that. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:04, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Long Beach bicycle path

I would like to see what was there and possibly merge some of the content. Can it be moved to my userspace? Also Long Beach bike path, but I think that was just a redirect? thanks. -Candleabracadabra (talk) 01:31, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Here is your content apart from tags and headings.

The Long Beach Bike Path in Los Angeles County meanders about 4.5 miles (7.2 km) along the sand from Shoreline Village in downtown Long Beach, California to Bayshore Avenue in Belmont Shore.[1] The path is shared with walkers, joggers, and skaters, so its attraction is more for scenery than for travel speed.

The Long Beach Bike path was originally proposed in the late 1970s but local residents resisted the bike path as it was felt it would be an eyesore.[2] That opposition faded away with time. Final plans for the path were ordered by the Long Beach City Council in 1986 with a budget of $1.4 million. [2]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/South Boston's Seaport District Cruise Destination

I, Legoines, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Legoines (talk) 01:45, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This has never been submitted for review, but in its present form it is not suitable for Wikipedia, because it is more of a tourist guide or link-farm than an encyclopedia article - see WP:NOTGUIDE #2 Travel guides. You might do better to submit it to our sister site Wikivoyage. JohnCD (talk) 09:51, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ima appweb

in the article it is mentioned in a clear way for a business, that they should have these kind of weapons to succeed in marketing their company. As i went through some other company pages. they had too mentioned about the work of their company, so i also mentioned it, if it is not allowed then i shall delete it by myself. :) -180.188.237.47 (talk) 10:16, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.. It also was certainly NOT written in any manner close to en encylopedia article ES&L 14:20, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

inout scripts

i need the contents because i need to know y it was deleted. -Newbewiki (talk) 12:21, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. ES&L 14:19, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my glob

reasoning -Theloltroll (talk) 13:39, 30 November 2013 (UTC) wait what whaeres the info gone[reply]

Not done - this is not an appropriate topic for inclusion on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Wikipedia does not accept articles which consist of original research, or which lack any reliable sources of information. ES&L 14:23, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hassan Abdalla

Thank you. I'll do it in a few minutes and let u know. Also, I'd like to republish the article according to the policies and guidelines. Should I rewrite and send back to u for review?

I have no problem with deleting the article. I was just wondering how I could get the text back? -Fayed.yousry (talk) 18:14, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can email it to you if you enable email on your account. To do that, click on "Preferences" at the top of the screen, and at the bottom of the "User profile" tab fill in your email address (which will not be visible to me or anybody) and check the box marked "Enable email from other users". You will need to respond to a confirmation email. JohnCD (talk) 18:36, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. The email has been set. It would be great if you could send me the text written in wiki form. Will make it much easier for me to edit it and repost it according to the guidelines. thanks a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fayed.yousry (talk • contribs) 16:01, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Focalizing

Danielmax32 (talk) 22:36, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 23:02, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cindy Bernadette

reasoningThe Article about Cindy Bernadette is important -YogaWP (talk) 00:59, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. JohnCD (talk) 16:10, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ayano Shiraishi

the page about Ayano Shiraishi is important -YogaWP (talk) 00:58, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - see reply for Cindy Bernadette above. It is not enough to say these are important, you need to show that other people think so, too, by giving references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources, see also WP:N and WP:MUSICBIO. JohnCD (talk) 16:13, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Shyam Sunder Premi

Shyam Sunder Premi (talk) 12:42, 1 December 2013 (UTC) User:Shyam Sunder Premi[reply]

 Not done. I have not restored User:Shyam Sunder Premi because that is not the right place for a draft article. Your user page is intended for you to say something about yourself and your Wikipedia work - see WP:User pages. Instead,
 Done - I have restored Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shyam Sunder "Premi". That is the right place for you to work on the article. What it needs is references to reliable sources, for two reasons: (a) because of the WP:Verifiability policy: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source", and (b) to establish WP:Notability, which requires references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 15:44, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:LouiseBrown1981/sandbox

I, LouiseBrown1981, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. LouiseBrown1981 (talk) 16:12, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:18, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Daniel Bradford

I, Annenubis, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Annenubis (talk) 17:43, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/TEMPI Syndrome

I, Sykesdb, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Sykesdb (talk) 20:28, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Randall Carver

Many prior revisions had copyright violations. Are there any revisions that do not infringe copyright? -George Ho (talk) 22:30, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done There is a blank page and a vandalism page. The A7 deletion was also a copyright violation. So nothing worth restoring. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 19:51, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Floyd Cardoz

I, Silvercouch55, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Silvercouch55 (talk) 03:00, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment:: I see you have re-created it. That's fine, but it will not be accepted in its present form. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note in particular that you need references, for two reasons: (a) because of the WP:Verifiability policy: "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source", and (b) to establish WP:Notability, which requires references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Also, be careful to maintain a neutral point of view and avoid promotional phrases like groundbreaking and truly celebrated the sensual flavors and spices of his native land. If the article sems to be trying to "sell" Cardoz, it will not be accepted. JohnCD (talk) 09:30, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Queiroz

there is nothing wrong with my page, please do not delete. -RobertQueiroz (talk) 03:44, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. There are plenty of sites like LinkedIn and Facebook where you can write about yourself, but Wikipedia is different: it is not a social-networking site but a project to build an encyclopedia, so it is selective about subjects for articles, and writing about oneself is strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at Wikipedia is not about YOU and Wikipedia:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 09:20, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/中誠信集團

I, 116.48.143.136, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 116.48.143.136 (talk) 09:47, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review: please complete it and submit it as soon as convenient. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and note the need for references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 15:57, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/James S. Carter AKA Karter Jaymes

Lisa Salio (talk) 12:19, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:01, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Master of Resources Law Studies

I, 98.245.129.232, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 98.245.129.232 (talk) 15:36, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. I think it is very unlikely that an individual course like this can meet Wikipedia's inclusion criterion of WP:Notability, which requires references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. It would probably be better to cover it by a mention in the College's article. JohnCD (talk) 16:10, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Neil Moffitt

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Amgprlv (talk) 17:20, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Washington State University Global Campus

I, Rhmillerr, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Rhmillerr (talk) 21:39, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, because an article already exists at Washington State University Global Campus. You are welcome to improve that: in its present state it might well be proposed for deletion, because its only references are to primary sources, but to establish Wikipedia:Notability requires references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 10:07, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ruth Morris Bakwin

I, Lisabethwcmc, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. The page was deleted because we did not update it in the last 6 months. We intend to update the page and will make sure to update it regularly. Lisabethwcmc (talk) 21:43, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:15, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have accepted the article which is now at Ruth Morris Bakwin, where you are welcome to develop it further. Thank you for your contribution. JohnCD (talk) 11:34, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Ridgewell

reasoning -80.229.246.153 (talk) 22:27, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Ridgewell is a contemporary Internet based film and multi-media creator. He has a large following and is in the YouTube 'Top 200 YouTubers of all time"

His short films and the animated "ASDF Movie" series have received over 444 million hits.

He has appeared on The BBC's One SHow and has been interviewed many times in media and technology programmes, and websites

I don't quite understand why a Wiki page on him would be deleted, as there is a growing interest in his career and content. It was a surprise when my original page was deleted. I would be happy to discuss this in more details with anyone

 Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. This article was deleted after a discussion took place at WP:Articles for deletion/Thomas Ridgewell, so it cannot be undeleted through this process; also, after that the article was re-created four times within a few days, so that the title has been salted - protected against creation without permission from an administrator.
If you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user TParis (talk). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 10:38, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Liam Axbey

Footballing career

Liam Axbey was a reserve goalkeeper for Npower League One football team Brentford F.C.

He made 4 appearances in total for the reserve side however he played for 14 minutes in a League Cup came against Rotherham United after the goalkeeper had to be substituted as he had an injury.

At the age of 38, Axbey moved to Ryman Premier side Harrow Borough having a short spell at the club.

His stay at Harrow Borough ended quickly after a disagreement with members of the backroom staff over how much game time he was getting.

He also tried to distract the linesman by saying 'No that is not a correct decision I will get my Axbey family on you if you do it again' repeatedly.

He then got sent out of the ground where he turned around, held his middle finger up whilst cursing towards the referee.

Personal life

He is currently at the age of 54 running many small charities around the UK for people with Down's Syndrome.

His brother has this condition and Liam is always there to help him with his charity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.218.6.197 (talk) 23:15, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. please expand this contribution and add references. And then submit for review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:26, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/VeriApp

I, Gujiangtao, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Gujiangtao (talk) 03:36, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:29, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Southern Brotherhood Militia

reasoning -74.192.92.81 (talk) 05:18, 3 December 2013 (UTC) It is needed information for the public to see.[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Dlohcierekim (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. The only reference given is the organization's own website, but to establish Wikipedia:Notability requires references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 09:56, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Responsiball

I, 46.126.170.142, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 46.126.170.142 (talk) 08:49, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. There is a more recent version at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/RESPONSIBALL which has not been deleted. I suggest you work on that. If the article is accepted, we can decide then whether the title should be all-caps. JohnCD (talk) 10:07, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Guide2tricks

its a rising website and to successfully rise we need a wikipedia page.its the only source.Please i request you to restore its. Thank You -117.198.102.32 (talk) 15:04, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Sorry, but Wikipedia is not here to help promote your website. If Wikipedia is "the only source" about it, then it does not (yet) meet our WP:Notability requirement, which requires references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 10:24, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chess London

I, James1912, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. James1912 (talk) 16:56, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. The article needs references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 09:57, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gabriel Calvo

I, 81.182.64.150, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 81.182.64.150 (talk) 18:54, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment The only available source is not independent--the author was "one of the pioneers of the Original Marriage Encounter in the U.S. " If we restore it, there is essentially no chance of writing an acceptable article. Perhaps it would be better to make a redirect from the founder's name to the organization. DGG ( talk ) 23:57, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nebraska Latino American Commission

I, Jasel.Cantu, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Jasel.Cantu (talk) 20:52, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, Almost all the existing text is an exact copyvio of http://latinoac.nebraska.gov/about.htm. This cannot be restored, but if you have third party sources you are at liberty to write an article in your own words . DGG ( talk ) 23:51, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Funkshone

This UK band is notable within Europe and Japan, and I would like to improve the article to reflect this more clearly, by adding significant new information and references. -ClareGC (talk) 21:19, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article was originally deleted after it was flagged under 'articles for deletion' as being non-noteable, and an American user commented that the band only seemed to have 'free downloads and such' (This is an error since the band have produced highly successful albums on CD and vinyl, and this is verifiable), and one further American user, who contributes to Wikipedia only in their role as a deletionist, added their support to the deletion, and so it was deleted after 7 days. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Funkshone

I requested a deletion review, however this didn't attract any discussion during the 8 days it remained open, so I don't know whether anyone has yet viewed the significant new information I submitted. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2013_November_22

We cannot help you here, but you can add another deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:52, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest you write a draft article - click Help:Userspace draft and fill in the title to make a draft page - with your new information and references, and go back to WP:Deletion review with a link to that. JohnCD (talk) 10:01, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you both for your replies, suggestions and details. I will write a draft introductory section, with references, in the hope that if this is considered acceptable for an article, it could be added into the original article, so that the page's history is preserved. The original had a lot of accurate information already present, including a near complete discography, which was contributed to by many users over 4 years. Possibly it's because the article has only just been deleted, but I'd feel like I was stealing their work, since the best I could write those sections, would be nearly exactly how they were before. I will add my draft in a new deletion review, as I had also hoped to generate a discussion on the level of influence a band needs to have to be included on Wikipedia, as I understand that it's more than simply selling successful albums. But I admit that that would be more for my general understanding, since I'd hoped to contribute to, and even start, articles about other bands, but am somewhat put off due to them being in the funk genre, where they might not be so well-known to the general worldwide population.
@ClareGC: actually, I think it is reasonable that you should have the old article as a starting point, so I have userfied it for you to User:ClareGC/Funkshone, and you can work on that. I have left in place for your reference the "multipleissues" tag at the top, to show concerns people had wih the article, but you can remove that if you address the issues. For general notability standards, see WP:GNG, and for bands see WP:BAND. JohnCD (talk) 11:22, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks very much for doing that. I'll start working on improving the article now. Thanks for the links as well. ClareGC (talk) 12:08, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

HireJungle

Requesting userfication of this deleted page for further improvements that will make it according to Wikipedia regulations. Thank you. -BiH (talk) 21:50, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HireJungle, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Mark Arsten (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:44, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Suvodeep chatterjee

reasoning -Jeetbnr (talk) 22:12, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Dont Delete He is really a world record holder and world record india and Record holder republic is a registered organization.World record holders are the pride of a country,who should be supported with respect, prosperity and honor by every country and every citizen as well.- user: Jeetbnr

spastic society of gurgaon

The article was deleted without justified reasons. The Society is doing charitable work at a great level. No objectionable mater is there in the article. Request for undeletion.The article may be published in larger interest of humanity. -117.212.122.84 (talk) 07:16, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

rajesh bhola

The article was deleted without justified reasons. Rajesh Bhola is a personality in social work and doing charitable work at a great level. No objectionable mater is there in the article. Request for undeletion.The article may be published in larger interest of humanity. -117.212.122.84 (talk) 07:22, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajesh Bhola, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Kww (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:28, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Suvodeep chatterjee

this person is a real world record holder and well known artist, his last group show comes in news paper also,he is also one winner of samsung incredible art among 3.2lakh perticipants, which was a guiness world record attempt.World record holders are the pride of a country,who should be supported with respect, prosperity and honor by every country and every citizen as well -Jeetbnr (talk) 10:43, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done This page is for requesting the undeletion of pages which were deleted uncontroversially. The article Suvodeep chatterjee has not been deleted, and is being discussed at Articles for deletion. You have already contributed to the discussion there, and are welcome to continue to do so; however, this page is not the venue for such a debate. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:47, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Network Startup Resource Center

I, 2601:7:2380:50D:958A:85FF:4869:F08E, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 2601:7:2380:50D:958A:85FF:4869:F08E (talk) 13:29, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Magazine Fed Paintball

I, 24.49.33.185, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 24.49.33.185 (talk) 16:10, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Magazine Fed Paintball

I was away for work and family needs and have just now been able to return work on this project. I would like to not start over -24.49.33.185 (talk) 16:12, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Andrea Beaman

I, Wholesomehelper, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Wholesomehelper (talk) 17:57, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done - this Articles-for-creation draft is what was deleted after being untouched for six months, but there is no need to undelete it, because the article Andrea Beaman exists in the main encyclopedia - see below. JohnCD (talk) 19:04, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Andrea Beaman

public figure is still active with career -Wholesomehelper (talk) 18:00, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article was originally deleted because I received a notification it had not been updated in over 6 months.

 Comment:: what was deleted was the Articles-for-creation draft, see above. This article has not been deleted, but deletion is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrea Beaman, and that is where you should comment. Read WP:DISCUSSAFD first. JohnCD (talk) 19:08, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sam pepper (artist)

it is factual and not promotion..references prove what is said -Kpshu (talk) 19:09, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alec Muffett

I, Melodien, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Melodien (talk) 23:04, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:21, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Juristovski

I see that the reason the article was deleted was due to a lack of "significant coverage" so I'm providing a list of applicable press coverage of Alan Juristovski, which details his success as a notable entrepreneur. Alan recently passed away, which I would like to have reflected on the page if/when it is reinstated.

<list of links removed - add them to the article>

What else needs to be done to have this page undeleted/reinstated? -Ostretch (talk) 23:35, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Smartse (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. Please update the article as soon as possible. JohnCD (talk) 11:12, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jamaica Vacation Spots

It's my Homework for class and I would Like to receive a grade for what I wrote this Far Thank YOU !!!!!! -Sara.Powell20 (talk) 00:06, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this is not an appropriate topic for inclusion on Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Wikipedia does not accept articles which consist of original research, or which lack any reliable sources of information. ES&L 11:03, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Next Generation Dental

I, Pjgdds, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Paul J Ganjian 06:40, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article for advice; it seems to me unlikely that this can meet Wikipedia's inclusion criterion of WP:Notability, which requires references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 16:14, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dillon_Lane

This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request. That said, as per WP:BLP this article cannot remain on Wikipedia - as per WP:AUTO and WP:COI, you cannot write an article about yourself, and as per the notability guidelines, you're not notable enough for an encyclopedia article. ES&L 10:59, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Belluck & Fox, LLP

I, 187.23.216.116, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. 187.23.216.116 (talk) 12:14, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done, too promotional in tone Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:01, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zenon Software

I would like to edit it according to Wikipedia guidelines -CD33 (talk) 12:49, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:CD33/Zenon Software. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Jimfbleak (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - articles that are not in compliance will be deleted.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/2012: A Year Of No Significance ... Colonial Penetrations in the First World - Part 1 in the Sound and Light of India series

I, 117.199.89.189, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. have not finished article and plan to - awaiting decision which may require more time - do not wish to recreate the article from scratch 117.199.89.189 (talk) 15:23, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This has never been submitted for review: please complete it and submit it as soon as convenient. Articles for creation is not for indefinite hosting of material not ready for the encyclopedia. Please read WP:Your first article for advice, and WP:Notability (books) to understand what is required for a book to have a Wikipedia article. JohnCD (talk) 23:01, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Relaxation Therapy

I, 209.161.48.38, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Would like to retrieve my submission for Relaxation Therapy and edit it. Have been busy but would like to get this posted on Wikipedia. Thank you, Barbara George 209.161.48.38 (talk) 15:47, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:57, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John Skibinski

I, Polishtom, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. Polishtom (talk) 17:12, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This has never been submitted for review: please complete it and submit it as soon as convenient. Articles for creation is not for indefinite hosting of material not ready for the encyclopedia. Read WP:Your first article for general advice, and Help:Table for how to make a table. JohnCD (talk) 11:03, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/William Jay Weissinger

I, Seattleatya, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please userfy or restore as appropriate. want to add citations.Seattleatya (talk) 17:33, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: User has already created a new article for the subject at William Jay Weissinger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 18:07, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Therefore,  Not done - no point undeleting the AfC draft, please add citations to the existing article. JohnCD (talk) 21:10, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jafaria Disaster Management Cell

reasoning -Prince.aliabbas (talk) 20:28, 5 December 2013 (UTC) The page has been wrongly deleted from Wikipedia as it does represent a 'welfare organization'. I want this page to be republished as it is more and more informative and necessary.[reply]

 Not done. It does not matter that this is a welfare organization, it is subject to the same rules as any other article, see Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause. The article was deleted (a) because it was largely a copyright violation from http://jdcwelfare.org/About-us.html, and (b) because it was much too promotional in tone for an encyclopedia article, which requires a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not a notice-board for pinning up copies of organizations' own literature. An article would also need to to establish WP:Notability by references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources . JohnCD (talk) 21:08, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

369 Micro Systems

need to updated information -Shraddha Kolbekar (talk) 10:09, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. This page cannot be restored because it is a copyright violation from http://www.369microsystems.com/about.html. Also, even if a formal copyright release were made, it is far too promotional in tone for a Wikipedia aricle, which requires a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not for advertising or promotion; it is not a notice-board for companies to post copies of their promotional literature. JohnCD (talk) 10:22, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

medindia

To recreate a new article for medindia -Castroregu (talk) 11:23, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Previous versions of the article were either unsalvageable advertising or copyright violations. I suggest you create a userspace draft of the article; if it is suitable then I or another admin will be happy to move it to the correct title over the creation protection. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:07, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kai Wong

Popularity of Producer in Independent Film Festivals and in China increased since 2006 -70.79.87.53 (talk) 13:01, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kai Wong (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user MBisanz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Yunshui 雲‍水 13:09, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kai Christophe Wong

merged with Kai Wong page in an earlier incorrect version. -70.79.87.53 (talk) 13:19, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ Brady, Patrick (2007). Bicycling: Los Angelos County: A Guide to Great Road Bike Rides. Menasha Ridge Press / Keen Communications. pp. 96–99. ISBN 0897327799. Retrieved 1 May 2013. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)
  2. ^ a b staff (October 7, 1986). "Long Beach : Bike Path Plans Ordered". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved May 1, 2013.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=584841054"