User talk:FreeRangeFrog

Regarding removal of SynapseIndia

As per your suggestion some more recognition of company has been added to the page with references which discuss the company's effort in details, hoping this establish the business as slightly more notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.177.163.244 (talk) 21:05, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Regarding removal of Rajkumar Javkar's name from the link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ventriloquists

Rajkumar Javkar is a notable Indian ventriloquist. Please visit this link to know more about him: http://www.rajarancho.com/?pid=5PO84Q269 Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Utkarshsingh.1992 (talk • contribs) 05:30, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

If they are notable then write an article about them, and then add a link to the list. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 09:23, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Deletion

Hello, I created the World Trade Center Tacoma wiki page under the user WTCTA but i want to delete it but i can't do it through that user because i've been blocked. Please delete this page. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sooffee (talk • contribs) 01:25, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Huge kudos

I just wanted to pop by to let you know how much your hard work and diligence regarding BLP issues is appreciated. Wikipedia and its BLP subjects are definitely well served by your efforts, both here and via OTRS. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 21:45, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Much appreciated, thank you! §FreeRangeFrog^croak 22:13, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

RfC

I noticed you participated in the Deadmau5/Deadmaus RM and I was wondering if you were willing to leave your two cents here at Talk:Tech Nine#Requested move 2 to overturn another horrible move based on a name no reliable sources refer to the subject as. I am just trying to get consensus to move it back to Tech N9ne in the same manner Deadmau5 was moved back per WP:COMMONNAME. If you have the chance I would appreciate it. STATic message me! 16:01, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

 Done Thanks for letting me know. I cannot believe we're even arguing about these types of things. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:48, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Middlesex University Logo.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Middlesex University Logo.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Please help me edit the page about "Stefan Radev (designer & visual artist)"

As there have been some messages about the page not being constructed neutral enough I would like to ask for help. The person this page is about had not a minor impact with his non commercial, but inspirational concept projects (under the concept brand VISIONS), further he contributed to the open source project OSMAND Android Navigation App with his UI creations (http://www.osmand.net/en/blog/76-osmand-100-released.html),(http://stefanradev.com/osmand-gps-app.html). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OsmAnd

All references that were included are of different and reliable sources (web & print media).

Please offer a suggestion of an appropriate edit about the article in order to be compliant.

Thank you in advance.

As the boxes at the top say: This article includes a list of references, but its sources remain unclear because it has insufficient inline citations. You need to provide citations for each of the claims in the article. See WP:CITE. This article contains wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information. The language is too promotional, not appropriate for an encyclopedic bio. This goes hand in hand with the lack of citations, since it seems you are providing the praise, not your sources. This article's tone or style may not reflect the encyclopedic tone used on Wikipedia. - same thing. See WP:MOSBIO at least. Finally, if you have a conflict of interest then you need to be extra careful how you edit the article - that's why we discourage people from writing about topics they are associated with. It's difficult to maintain a neutral point of view. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:59, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

To help stay awake during all the good work you do at the BLP board, cheers! Malerooster (talk) 17:56, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Like Thank you User:Malerooster! Much appreciated! §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:04, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

DRN needs your help!

Hi there. I've noticed it's been a while since you've been active at DRN, and we could really use your help! DRN is going to undergo some changes soon, so it'd really be great if our backlog is cleared before the start of August and we have as many people on board to help with the changes (they include a move to subpages and the creation of a rotating "co-ordinator" role to help manage things day-to-day. Hope to see you soon! Steven Zhang ^{Help resolve disputes!} 11:31, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

@Steven Zhang: Thanks for the invite, I apologize that I did not remove myself from the category after I decided to stop contributing to DR, but I just don't have the time for it at the moment. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 22:24, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

That's OK. Please feel free to pick up again when you have time :) Steven Zhang ^{Help resolve disputes!} 22:36, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Fiji Airways Logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Fiji Airways Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 08:21, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Re: Disruptive editing on Ryan Braun

Hi there. My edit was removing vandalism and defamatory information by Honus34. Your reversion and warning were incorrect. I am removing the warning message if that's okay. Thank you. 24.22.129.98 (talk) 23:13, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Your revert re-added the libel you were trying to remove and also a broken image link. Make sure you know which revision you're reverting... Ajraddatz (Talk) 23:17, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Yes, I'm sorry. Looks like I took too long to examine the vandalism and I reverted the wrong edit. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 23:24, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Totally understand, hopefully the semi-protection request will go through eventually. 24.22.129.98 (talk) 23:35, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mally Roncal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Middletown, New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Ping Fu (again)

Hi FreeRangeFrog, it's been a little while since you helped me on the Ping Fu article and I was wondering if you'd be able to lend a hand there again? Back at the end of May, I proposed a more detailed introduction and updated version of the article's infobox for editors on Ping's page to take a look at (see request here). One editor was happy with what I'd suggested and the only critical comment was from an editor questioning her job title at her new company, which I've since been able to provide a very clear source for. Although no-one has objected and I think the updates would be an improvement, I've not had any luck from asking if anyone there would make the changes in the article. Would you mind taking a quick look and moving the drafted updates live if you're happy to do so? Totally understand if you're busy on other things, let me know if you think there's someone else who could help. Thanks, 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 22:45, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

@16912 Rhiannon: I'll be happy to help, I'll take a look on Monday and we'll get it squared away, no problem. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:31, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

@16912 Rhiannon:  Done I closed your edit request on the article talk page as well. One thing - your infobox markup did not include the photograph, so I added it with the photograph. I assume that was an oversight, let me know if not. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:08, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks heaps! And yep, I just hadn't included the image since it wasn't available when I first made my request (the original photo had been taken down off Commons and I don't think this had been added yet), so thanks for adding that. 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 21:25, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Datadog

Hello FreeRangeFrog. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Datadog, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims coverage in reliable sources. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 02:34, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Redirect

Hi FRF, I undid your redirect from Paddy McGuiness's wife to him, as I had left a tag on the article saying I was working on it. That means it is not finished, so please just wait until Inhave finished before deciding to redirect it. Thanks, Matty.007 20:30, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

It's been deleted, so no worries. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:38, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Break

Dear FreeRangeFrog, Thank you for removing the biased part from the article about Volodymyr Viatrovych. Several people have tried to remove the Critique section as it contains blatant disinformation and full of Polish chauvinism. I have complained to Wikipedia about the author GlaubePL. Wikipedia support have replied that they will open up a discussion on the topic on the Bio poster board (or smth like that). I believe contributing authors may participate. I encourage you to take part in the discussion. Thank you again. Petro Mohyla — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.9.1.100 (talk) 14:23, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Dear FreeRangeFrog, Thank you very much for your valuable contribution to the BLP noticeboard discussion on the V.Viatrovych article. As you can see from the discussion GlaubePL has no intention whatsoever to adhere to Wikipedia standards and rules to be neutral and impartial. He is probably not aware there is more life outside the Polish borders... Anyways, thank you again. Sincerely, Petro Mohyla — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.9.1.100 (talk) 14:24, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Please keep in mind that I'm not taking "your" side in this, whatever that might be. I am concerned with the way the article presents information about a living person, that's all. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 00:26, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi, what do you think about a new version of Critique section in my sandbox [1]? If you think it needs some linguistic corrections feel free to do it. GlaubePL (talk) 13:45, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

@GlaubePL: Honestly that's not much better. But I'll post to the NPOV board tomorrow so you can get a second opinion. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:34, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Not much better? NPOV? Come on, this is based on the academic literature from professional historians, this is not my POV. Where is this "NPOV board"? GlaubePL (talk) 15:37, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

See here. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 16:10, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Ewa Siemaszko, Władysław Siemaszko

FreeRangeFrog, I noticed that you take care about keeping standards of BLP. So please explain me why English Wikipedia tolerates biased cricicism secion about Ewa and Władysław Siemaszko? There are only negative opinions quoted (positive have been silenced), some of them from doubious sources like Yaroslav Tsaruk (who is mentioned as "historian" but he is not historian at all, but the etnographer; in the citations I did in the talk page of Volodymyr Viatrovych, you can find very negative opinion on Tsaruk by professor Partacz). GlaubePL (talk) 20:33, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Please see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. If you feel those articles have the same type of problems, you are free to take the same steps I took with yours. Any editor is free to do so. You seem to be emotionally invested in this topic - all the more reason to stay away from it, because it's very difficult to maintain a neutral point of view. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 00:23, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

FreeRangeFrog, Noone can be neutral to the mass killings and its denialism. Anyway, I will try to redact 'Criticism' section on V.Viatrovych according to your remarks (however I still don't understand some of them). GlaubePL (talk) 07:25, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

There is no "my side". I was appalled that GlaubePL used Wikipedia as a public forum for his petty Polish chauvinism which goes against Wikipedia fundamentals. It is even more valuable that you personally probably don't have a slightest idea what Glaube's emotions are all about. I thanked you not for taking "my side", but for being true to Wikipedia policy. Great job, I am really impressed! Petro Mohyla — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.150.223.78 (talk) 02:16, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Engelbertha Krupp

The notifications system should have pinged you, but just in case it hasn't, see User talk:RCasimir#Speedy deletion declined: Engelbertha Krupp. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 09:53, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

@JohnCD: Thank you for the heads up! Like I mentioned in the talk page, Dstrob had created this in their userpage and asked for help to "change the title", so I assisted in creating the article, reminded him of his COI, clarified the article could not be an advertisement for his book, etc. I figured it was a worthy historical topic, but never really looked into it much. If the entire notability is based on iffy evidence provided by the author's own work then it should definitely be deleted. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:36, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Engelbertha Stroebele for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Engelbertha Stroebele is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. I have included in this nomination the related article John Joseph Stroebele.

The articles will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Engelbertha Stroebele until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the articles during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notices from the top of the articles.

(A German user made the main nomination, but did not inform people: I have bundled in the related article about ENgelbertha's husband, which evidently stands or falls with hers). Regards, JohnCD (talk) 17:42, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serbian_traditional_music Improving Page

Hello, I am an international student at Berklee college of music and this page is my project for the class! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serbian_traditional_music Please tell me what specifically I need to do in order to not see those flags on my page anymore. I added the source when I've seen the flag. Source is the existing wikipedia page in my native Serbian language. I've just translated it to English. Thank you very much in advance! Branko Popovic — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brankodrums (talk • contribs) 02:47, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

@Brankodrums: It's not enough to translate a page and paste a link saying you're referencing an article on another language Wikipedia. You need to provide citations to sources that back up the information in the article. The wording of the article as it is at the moment is also inappropriate. See WP:MOS. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 03:02, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Ok, thank you very much for your quick respond! I will do my best to improve it asap! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brankodrums (talk • contribs) 03:44, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Common Affordable Lightweight Fighter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lockheed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Regarding Yelena Mizulina page

Hi I am a newbie and am perhaps a bit confused. You mention that the refs are in Russian and that this is somehow bad- indeed I cannot find much information on the Internet concerning this person in English. In light of the recent controversy, I feel that it may be important to for people to be aware of the fact that there are more politicians in Russia than its president. As I pointed out in the article Mrs. Mizulina is a VERY controversial public figure and I felt that it was important for people outside of the Russian-speaking world to be aware pf the different personalities involved in the debate surronding several of the controversies that she has been involved in, of which I have mentioned the main ones. Please indicate what you find excessive. The infromation I mention has made headlines in Russia. The information I indicated is quite similar to that found in the Russian-language page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sine Oculis (talk • contribs) 19:28, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

@Sine Oculis: Please see my comments at WP:BLP/N. Let's keep the discussion there. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:52, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

User edit warring on Goodluck Jonathan page

Hi there, I am not well versed in handling edit wars, but there is a user user talk:FRANKBISTORY that is continuing to undo constructive edits to the Goodluck Jonathan page, and since I saw your name in the history of edits there, I was hoping you could help. I apologize if this isn't the correct protocol, but I don't really know what the right protocol is! Thanks. Rockypedia (talk) 00:58, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

If he reverts again he'll be over WP:3RR and I'll report him for edit warring and removal of other people's comments on talk pages. That said, you should not be making accusations of sockpuppetry unless you're prepared to open a case at WP:SPI. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 02:14, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, FreeRangeFrog. You have new messages at Talk:Warm Mouse.
Message added 19:17, 6 September 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

You formerly made a comment about this Talk page, and article improvement, on the page of editor User talk:Among Men back in June 2013. So you are invited to the discussion on the Warm Mouse talk page. N2e (talk) 19:17, 6 September 2013 (UTC) N2e (talk) 19:17, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Break

hello Frog :) thank you for trying too help ..... about my articule ( Bogusz Banderski ) - it willbe supplemented at time — Preceding unsigned comment added by BoguszeQ (talk • contribs) 22:23, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

@BoguszeQ: Please examine the notability guidelines for inclusion of biographies here as well as the guidelines on conflict of interest for individuals here. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 22:35, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Break2

FreeRangeFrog Deepa Miriam Is the wife of me. If you want to verify please clie ck on the given YouTube link. And just leave me and Deepa . http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-W-3gwb7qbQ Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antopandeth (talk • contribs) 01:10, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

@Antopandeth: Regardless of who you are, your edits must have reliable sources. If they don't, you will continue to be reverted. The policy on biographies is also important reading here, as well as the policy on conflict of interest. Bottom line is, you probably shouldn't be editing this article at all. But if you do continue to edit it, make sure you follow our policies or you might end up being blocked and unable to edit anything. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me, or use the Help desk. Either way, that you are related to a subject doesn't give you special editing privileges. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 01:23, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for deleting old bio and adding the one I submitted!

I'm on a mission to try to understand why my other admin and I can't seem to get my proper bio up I WROTE AND SUBMITTED?!?! I don't know who or where you are but thank you, please PLEASE ADD WHAT I'VE BEEN TRYING TO SUBMIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HERE IT IS AGAIN! AND thanks for deleting what some other person wrote, and just using this!!have a great evening!

Lori Alan started talking as soon as she fell out of the womb, and hasn't stopped since. A native of the Washington, DC area, her passion for entertaining led the five-year-old actress to make her television debut as the star of a Shakey's Pizza commercial. She went on to graduate with honors from NYU's Tisch School of the Arts and set off cutting her teeth on the comedy circuit, as a longtime member of New York's Gotham City Improv (Groundlings East).

Lori is perhaps best known for her voice-over work. She starred as Diane Simmons on Family Guy, Pearl the Whale on SpongeBob: Squarepants, and Sue Richards, The Invisible Woman, on Marvel Comics' The Fantastic Four, among many other fantastic animated roles (Monster's University, Toy Story 3, Despicable Me 2, WALL•E, Henry Hugglemonster, Metal Gear Solid, Cow and Chicken, Animaniacs, and Futurama) and a long, successful commercial career.

Lori has firm roots in theatre, where she's thrived for over three decades. She most recently mounted a smash solo show, Lori Alan: The Musical, and appeared alongside Paul Reubens in The Pee-Wee Herman Show. Of her role as Queen Celia in the hit musical Sneaux!, Backstage West proclaimed, "Lori Alan might give Carol Burnett pause!" She originated the role of Mae in the award-winning musical ReeferMadness, a performance that earned raves from Kenny Morse of CBS Radio, who called her "a standout whose talent will take her very far". Luckily, that talent brought Lori right to the small screen.

From roles on the gripping Showtime drama Ray Donovan, to the hilarious Comedy Central gem Workaholics, to the deliciously naughty Desperate Housewives, Lori's energy and natural essence flow effortlessly from genre to genre. A true character actress in every sense of the word, when Lori speaks, the world listens. She delves deeply into her material, emerging with the power to make the audience laugh and cry in the same moment. Her television career has flourished with appearances on Bones, Southland, CSI, 90210, Law and Order (both LA and the original), and every other show imaginable.

Lori lives in Los Angeles with the love of her life (whom she met on the plane!) and as many rescue dogs as she can fit in their yard. Her hobbies include singing in the shower, discovering new gluten-free cookies, and trying to switch to decaf. Despite having no kids, she is a MILF. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.148.254.86 (talk) 02:41, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

P.S. COULD YOU ADD MY PICTURE ?? THANK YOU!!!!! TRIED UPLOAD TO NO AVAIL...THANK YOU!!!

/Users/lorialan/Desktop/LORI ALAN.JPG — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.148.254.86 (talk) 02:45, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi - I'm not sure which article you're referring to, is it Lori Alan? And you want all this pasted in there? We need reliable sources for that. Can you provide them? Also, the image would have to be emailed to the photo submissions team as detailed here. I'll be happy to help you but we can't just add unsourced stuff to a biography, that's not the way it works. Also the language needs to be a bit less promotional. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 16:18, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Duplicate Files

Hi. Thanks for picking this up. I don't know which is which - a google search returns the same pic for both which doesn't help. I am going to delete the files until I can verify Gbawden (talk) 06:40, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

@Gbawden: That's probably the best course of action. Thanks! §FreeRangeFrog^croak 16:14, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Batting (baseball)

I put the classic series of photos back in. This is an incredibly informative gif! Please go to the talk page if you disagree. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 21:11, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Antopandeth (talk) 02:37, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Please Try to Understand

FreeRangeFrog, I am not frustrated in any manner because the fact is fact. The block on me from adding content was lifted and I have reverted Deepa’s(my wife) marital status in the Article. The fact is that from the beginning, when I created the article, the marital status was there for three years. Now you started to edit the article even after giving you enough links to prove marital status. Still you revert the article by hiding the fact Deepa is married to me, I think you have some personal interest in this matter. This will affect the credibility of encyclopedia. Most of the people depending on the information provided by Wikipedia and trust it. By the action your kind of editors, without knowing the fact directly, will lead to misunderstandings. So, kindly try to be self controlled while editing the Wikipedia encyclopedia. Please do not allow to reflect your emotional jousters on hard core information. If you can’t understand the language in links (for citation), you can ask for a marriage certificate which is in English. I can provide it through a personal email. My mail Id is anto.pandeth@gmail.com, or you can contact me on my phone. Please feel free to send your email to me if you want to see the marriage certificate. I hope this statement will help me.

Anto Pandeth and Deepa Anto & Deepa Deepa's statement about her husband

Thank you.

Antopandeth.

Removing My Edit: Middle East, Valgria

I do believe you made a mistake. It seems neutral to me, seeing as it is what happened. Do we say that what Nazi Germany did to the Jews under the command of Hitler wasnt wrong, just because it doesn't seem neutral? Kydon Shadow (talk) 19:55, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your edit was off-topic and out of scope from the article where you placed it. If you feel it wasn't, post a message to the talk page and suggest the change to other editors there. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:04, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Fort Augustus Abbey comment

Hi. You removed an edit of mine from the Fort Augustus Abbey because it was unsourced. Wasn't it clear that my edit was itself addressing the *lack* of sufficient sourcing for the rest of that section? The section contains the statement "The allegations included ... sexual abuse". My intent was not to say that that statement was false, but rather that it wasn't sufficiently sourced to be included. By asking me four a source, you are effectively looking for me to provide a *negative* source -- i.e. a source that shows the other statement was unsourced! Or, put another more convoluted way, can *you* provide a source to show that my statement -- itself intended to balance an insufficiently sourced statement -- is itself insufficiently sourced? I won't challenge this any further, and I won't myself re-insert my edit. However, if the above: a. makes sense, and b. is convincing, you could perhaps reverting your revert? Whatever you decide, your attention and contribution to Wikipedia is appreciated. All the best. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.114.180.201 (talk) 16:14, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

If you feel that the information there is incorrect, or incorrectly phrased, then you (and anyone else) are free to fix it - without changing the meaning and purpose of the paragraph. What we cannot have is commentary on sourced information. Sourced counterpoints are fine. I don't doubt what you said is correct, but we need verifiability, not opinion or analysis. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 22:52, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Daniel Squadron

Thanks for helping out there. I'll back away from the article so we avoid edit conflicts. You are removing things I already removed days ago and were put back in. We will need to monitor this article and deal with some aggressive IP's in order to keep it cleaned up. We'll see how it goes I guess. Thanks again! -- — Keithbob • Talk • 00:46, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

@Keithbob: I'm sure the IP(s) will revert, etc. Let's keep an eye out, if it gets beyond 3RR we can justify protection. Right now though a BLP vio protection would be a hard sell since there's nothing incredibly inappropriate or insulting, etc. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 00:49, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Looks like we got the protection anyway. Thanks for your support and work on the article. I've started a bunch of threads on the talk page. Would love to have your input when youhave time. Cheers! -- — Keithbob • Talk • 03:45, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Break - RJL

Moved discussion
The following is a closed discussion. Please do not modify it.
Moved to Talk:Raul Julia-Levy Good afternoon- I thank you for your edits however stop editing information that is correct. You are posting things about Raul Julia-Levy which are false and slanderous. If infact you continue to post these things action will be taken thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chuy33 (talk • contribs) 22:30, 1 October 2013 (UTC) @Chuy33: Let me be clear - if you threaten me or anyone else again, I will ask for your account to be blocked and the article protected, at which point you will be unable to edit it at all. Your wording about the "biological offspring" on the article is in contradiction with the available sources, and Wikipedia must strive to be neutral and present all sides of a topic whenever possible. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:09, 2 October 2013 (UTC) Chuy33 seems to mainly a SPA that is interested in deleting information from "celebrity" bios. Liz Read! Talk! 21:42, 3 October 2013 (UTC) @Liz: Yes, and I just reported the threat above to WP:ANI. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:47, 3 October 2013 (UTC) I'm not sure why I took it on but I found an account (Otooledupree) from 2007 who did most of the edits to Raul Julia-Levy's page and he/she went to Help, declared him/herself Levy's publicist, and asked that the article only be edited by his representatives. So, that's where much of the early content came from. There have been a couple other accounts (including IPs) who focused on editing that article, but not exclusively. Liz Read! Talk! 00:07, 4 October 2013 (UTC) @Liz: I too noticed the Wikipedia:Help desk post from Otooledupree that he signed "L.H. Vaughnes". The Raul Julia-Levy bio on IIMDb was created by one L.H. Vaughnes. Otooledupree (who also edited from IP 70.187.146.15 signing his posts Otooledupree when asking for full page protection, Diff of Wikipedia:Requests for page protection) uploaded numerous images, created Flauntmypet (a RJL project), and created a back story like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abraham Levy the alleged maternal grandfather (maybe identical to the bio here), and he added some unsourced fluff to Aerolíneas Internacionales, that I have now removed. For what it's worth, RJL's "deep commitment to the issues of animal welfare ... was motivated by the sudden death of his beloved Scottish Terrier, O'Toole". Best, Sam Sailor Sing 12:46, 8 October 2013 (UTC) Wow, Sam Sailor , you couldn't make this stuff up if you tried. Luckily, you and §FreeRangeFrog trimmed back the most egregious puffery (WP:Peacock). I think the biggest question is whether to remove his claim of being Raul Julia's son. As far as I can see, there is only his claim and no public acknowledgement from Julia's family...in fact, his widow sued him for this claim (for which, there is apparently documentation). It would be a huge hit to his biography but without verification, it shouldn't be asserted as fact in Wikipedia. Liz Read! Talk! 13:09, 8 October 2013 (UTC) P.S. Should this conversation be copied to Levy's Talk Page? L. I support to move this discussion to RLJ's talk page using {{Moved discussion to}}, but since we are on Frog's talk page I believe the move should be left to him. (Btw having more than one section with the name "Break" gives a minor problem.) Best, Sam Sailor Sing 14:21, 8 October 2013 (UTC) One last thing, Sam Sailor, I don't know if you stumbled on to RJL's Live Journal Page but, man, if this is the same person, it's amazing that such a bogus biography lasted as long on WP as it did. The unedited claims on that page ("known as the Howard Hughes of Mexico") are so patently false, it's like really bad fiction. Liz Read! Talk! 16:53, 8 October 2013 (UTC) Oh the lulz... Anyway, if you guys want to move this to the talk page, that's fine. Probably better there anyway. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:09, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

question about boxing articles

I've tried adding a boxing article but it seems like there's little to no impetus for boxing fans to help write wikipedia boxing articles, especially for 2nd-tier and 3rd-tier boxers. Not only that, but boxing articles seem to be written (and dominated by) boxing enthusiasts who are pressing for a particular point to be made or advocated. In your opinion (of someone with no particular enthusiasm for boxing) are boxers inherently notable the same way as, let's say, baseball players? (every single 2013 MLB player has a wikipedia page) Any boxer who has made a name for himself is notable imho. It is extraordinarily difficult to train, grow, and develop a fighter's skills due to the vagueness & complexity of the sport; yet, boxers who have a non-meteoric career seem to inherently have no belonging here on Wikipedia. Boxing fans don't care about putting in "mediocre" boxers (who are stellarly gifted and extraordinarily athletic in their own right) because the way boxing is presented to the public is highly correlated to the way the general populace presents boxing to the readers of Wikipedia. Until boxing fans realize they are being sold a "product" based on coverage bias, they will fail to give more than passing mention to 2nd and 3rd-tier boxers, sadly. Lemonsdrops (talk) 20:48, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

@Lemonsdrops: That people are not interested in creating articles about a certain topic doesn't mean the topics are not appropriate, it just means they have to be created. As long as they pass the notability guidelines you should be OK, even a few stubs wouldn't hurt. There's also a project with folks that might help. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 03:46, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Just curious, is it frowned upon to make 10-20 stub articles and leave them after just 2-5 sentences? I feel bad because it feels like i'm gaming the system if I just toss a few bones to assert their notability and nothing thereafter. For the same effort I could create one well written article than 10-20 stubs but I'm soured by that which is beyond my low investment hurdle of minimal effort. Should I create a couple more measly stub articles and go from there? Or should I seek feedback first on the wikiproject rather than asking an admin? Wikipedia has a daunting amount of "help articles" which seemed geared for serious editors rather than casual, small-scale editors like myself. Sad and confused :-( Lemonsdrops (talk) 10:23, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

No, it's not frowned upon at all. And stubs are better than having nothing :) Definitely check with the project folks, especially from a notability perspective. Wouldn't make much sense to create material that will end up being challenged and deleted because they feel to meet the inclusion guidelines. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:01, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

		The Editor's Barnstar
		Thanks for making that article! Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:25, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

• Thanks for making the article- I was too lazy to make it myself! Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:25, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Dani Stevenson

The link has Stevenson's contact information and lists her name within the information box. So it is in fact a reliable source (and yes I am aware of the WP). WillieLimpD (talk) 01:31, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

YouTube is not a reliable source. Find one, and then use it to put that in. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 03:44, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

The WP lists that if the link fits the criteria, then it's reliable. The uploader of the content is a music video company that produced and released the video. Furthermore, it lists Stevenson's contact information and even has her in the video. Therefore, it is a reliable citation.WillieLimpD (talk) 12:31, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Daniel Ghita

You could have marked it as unsourced. Now I need to look for something in his native language. Because on google Sora is linked to Ghita. Remove only absurd info! My time is precious these days. Illovecoffee (talk) 21:23, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

@Illovecoffee: I don't mark unsourced information with {{cn}}, I remove it. That's what WP:BLP is for. We were contacted by the subject of the article via WP:OTRS, he challenged the information in the article, and since it was unsourced I removed it. Everyone's time is precious, but we have to take the time to make sure biographies of living persons are correctly sourced. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:34, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Insert giant sigh here

• FYI. Now if we could just convince the auto-confirmed editors to read WP:BLP we'd be off to the races! --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 22:57, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

You beat me to it. I was waiting for the next revert from the IP §FreeRangeFrog^croak 23:00, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Hey, now! I was an IP user for years! Most vandals might be IPs but that doesn't mean that most IPs are vandals. Half of the time, I just didn't want to log in. It was simpler just to do the edit and move on! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:31, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

@Liz: Agreed, most IPs are extremely helpful, but when one of them gets into edit warrior mode they're really hard to deal with, more so than people with established accounts. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:00, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Liz, I'm not sure why you took offense, neither I nor FreeRangeFrog said anything about IPs being vandals? I was pointing to a RFPP I had initiated to help stem the tide of BLP violations from a specific set of IPs on a specific article. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 18:09, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Oh, Jezebel'sPonyo, I wasn't offended at all! I wish I could use smileys on these Talk Pages but I'm sure that would push a lot of Editors right over the edge (also, not being serious!). Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:32, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Oh good! I thought perhaps I had conveyed something unintended in my original message. On a side-note, if I ever go off the deep-end, I intend to do it here. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 18:35, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stokes' paradox, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stokes equations (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Stokes' paradox

No articles at all currently link to the new article you created titled Stokes' paradox. That's something to work on. Michael Hardy (talk) 23:36, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

 Done Thanks! §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:11, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your edits at Sinitta

Please go over WP:BLPPRIMARY. Until you have a secondary reliable source that can be used to reference date of birth or any other type of personal information, it needs to stay off the article. If you have any questions, there's a discussion thread at WP:BLP/N. Thanks. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 23:53, 30 September 2013 (UTC) No there isn't.

1) birth certificate 2) First person article where subject admits age.

How many more sources do you want?????? --The Totter 00:48, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Andy Vollmer

I've restored most of the material you deleted from Andy Vollmer because you seem to have some basic misunderstanding of what WP:OR is and when WP:PRIMARY sources are appropriate and when they are not. In this case, quoting directly from the WP:PRIMARY source when the citation is that someone said something is highly reliable. Interpretations of the primary source require secondary sources as do personal details. You deleted a direct quote from the transcript, not any interpretation of it.

However, I have provided additional secondary sources because that paragraph does do some interpretation (which you left!).

Toddst1 (talk) 02:48, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

No, a transcript is by definition a primary source, and extracting a negative quote from there is POV at best, OR on a good day. In that same transcript there's a claim by another one of the SEC employees basically telling the congressmen that they were responsible for the problem, since it was Congress who enacted the deregulation that allegedly ended up creating the situation where Maddoff could get away with what he did. And that seems to me a perfectly valid point, no less valid than some congressman's (who for all I know is trying to look good to his constituents) claim that the SEC and its employees are worthless. But now we're into interpretation of the source, right? Which is inappropriate to begin with. Anyway, I removed the quote, since it represents undue weight to me. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:45, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

John Stephenson (actor)

Hi, below is a copy of a message sent to Wikipedia's help desk. I'm not going to make any other edits to the article and I understand now about not using the sources given but how can you or anyone else for that matter dispute the SSDI? Also, I suggest that you don't talk to me like a dog anymore or I'll report you to the same people. You could very easily have made your point without the threats. Also, who are you to be deleting info that I've provided which has been verified to be fact? I've been doing this for a few years now and was doing obituary research long before anyone ever heard of Wikipedia.

Here's the message I sent. Like I said, I won't make anymore edits in regards to his presumed death but it's only out of respect for the family in the minute chance he may still be living and certainly not because of you.

---

(redacted)

Rowdycat (talk) 22:02, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

What you need to do is go read WP:BLPPRIMARY and then WP:OR, and I'm serious about my suggestion that you stay away from biographies completely. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 22:08, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

This is personal, unsourced information, §FreeRangeFrog...maybe you could delete it from your Talk Page or at least place it in your TP archives. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:59, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, another problem. Redacted. Thanks. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 22:03, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

John Stephenson P.S.

By the way, I just noticed on your talk page that you encourage people who write to you to be nice. I suggest you follow your own advice because you sure weren't nice to me. Rowdycat (talk) 22:14, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

No, I wasn't. There's a point where I have to be frustrated when someone decides to violate an important part of one of Wikipedia's most important policies because they think they are "right". I'd recommend you volunteer for OTRS so you can reply to distraught people who are looking at Google search results and Wikipedia articles saying their loved ones are deceased, and then tell me to be nice. We are stewards of people's information and we have to follow the policies that have been built to manage that information responsibly. If anything, you could at least have reached out to me before you re-added that information, and I would have gladly explained what was going on. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 22:28, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Andrew Gilligan

I wanted to raise a concern beyond the allegation issue (which I will leave for the BLP noticeboard). There appears to have been regular attempts over the years to try and remove or rewrite anything that doesn't portray Gilligan in positive terms; some users seem to exist solely for this purpose, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Craig142 - compared to a few years ago, the entry has significantly reduced in a manner that may seem suspicious. Relevant content has been removed and is not even referenced. As I have been a regular editor for that entry, my perspective may be subjective; perhaps you could offer a fresh viewpoint? UsamahWard (talk) 09:26, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

@UsamahWard: yeah, that looks like a lot of suspicious SPA edits. But even SPAs with a conflict of interest sometimes have a point - the trick is to prevent them from removing valid information while making sure we don't create unbalanced POV-y messes out of bios. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:46, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Taking your last point, perhaps the fact that he worked as an intern for Keith Vaz should remain in the article, omitting the allegation he forged references. UsamahWard (talk) 20:08, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Per your point in the article's talk page, I see no problem with that. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 22:03, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Further changes by an unnamed editor leave the impression of an effort to 'sanitize' the entry. I have used the entry's talk page for discussion about specific changes. Perhaps you could keep an eye, as I may be becoming oversensitive to the many changes. UsamahWard (talk) 13:51, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, that's definitely trying to remove valid information - the incident is perfectly well sourced and obviously notable given coverage. I'm watching it as well, so no worries. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 14:05, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

I'm just about worn out on this, life's too short! Despite your clear comment on the talk page, the 'Sockpuppeting' was removed again; 'John' and the anonymous editor between them have appeared out of nowhere and really gone to town on Gilligan's entry. 'John' has posted twice on my own talk page in the last couple of days to warn me not to edit the entry. I was interested to find, whilst fruitlessly looking for mainstream sources about the Sockpuppeting allegations, a report of a much earlier attempt on Gilligan's entry: http://www.boriswatch.co.uk/2009/02/02/wikipedia-wars-now-thats-funny/. The mention of an apparent SPA 'Sandler151' is shockingly similar to the aforementioned Craig142. I'm going to try and take a day away from all this! UsamahWard (talk) 17:51, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Just realised, that external link I gave relates to an archived discussion on the Talk page for Gilligan's entry - sorry, it's been a long day, I'm slowing down! Anyway, it's clear this matter was debated at great length before, then retained. In the light of that, I think its removal is even more questionable, as no new reasoning has been brought to the discussion. UsamahWard (talk) 18:17, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Don't sweat the petty things and don't pet the sweaty things §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:51, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Ah, now I can end my day with a smile on my face - thanks! UsamahWard (talk) 21:35, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Brad Troemel AfD renomination

Hello FreeRangeFrog. I just wanted to let you know that Brad Troemel has been nominated for deletion. You participated in the discussion two years ago which resulted in a Keep, so wanted to let you know, and encourage you to join the discussion.--Theredproject (talk) 15:25, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

User_talk:88.104.19.237#October_2013

Please see my response, and please read the template warning, and reconsider if it's appropriate. If you agree it is not, please strike it. Thanks. 88.104.19.237 (talk) 14:40, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Ah, my apologies. Actually my intention was to convey the meaning of {{Uw-delete3}} but that's a bit harsh and would also be inappropriate at this point. But you get the point, right? You're removing properly sourced information, seemingly because you don't like it, against consensus to retain. In any case, it's your talk page, if you wish to remove that you're free to do so, or if you want me to do it, I will. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 14:51, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Nope, I removed weakly sourced negative information from a BLP, in line with policy - which says we're supposed to now discuss it before it is reinstated. Very far from 'disruptive editing'. If I'd reverted again then maybe there would be a case for that, but I haven't.

I hope you might investigate it a bit further. At first glance, it might seem like something worthy of inclusion with those newsworthy-sounding sites but, they're not news articles, they're blogs - and they're the blogs of people who have frequently expressed a great disliking for the person in question. The newspapers themselves have not covered this quite frivolous accusation. It's a blog saying another blog says that in a blog, he used a pseudonym - it's all very tenuous - just repeating some claims made on anti-G blogging sites; if there was any chance of proving he'd done it, I'm sure newspapers would have carried the story - that they have not is quite telling. 88.104.19.237 (talk) 15:15, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

I don't deny you may have a point, but let's keep the conversation in the article's talk page. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:52, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Anthony Portantino SPA

I noticed that the editor you warned has been attacking this article for literally years so I've added this to my watchlist so I can help look for more BLP violations. Thanks for bringing it to attention. --Eggishorn (talk) 21:36, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Great, thanks. Hopefully they'll rent a clue and stop, or contribute in a more productive way. They did have a few valid edits, so it's not something I'd want to bring to AIV at this point. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 00:24, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Kristine W

Greetings,

I have been a close personal friend of Kristine Weitz for many years and I can vouch that her birth date is definitely June 3rd,1963. I have traveled with her abroad and have seen her passport. Also you might want to consider logically, if she won the pageant in 1981 (as stated and shown in the photo link) then she would have to have been at least 18 years old of age in 1981.

I find no reason as to why you are constantly removing accurate information. I'd be happy to provide proof, however just about every site that refers to a census costs money.

If you can be kind enough to point me to the right direction for finding a free site that includes census and/or birth records I would be happy to include some kind of linked proof.

Cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.17.96.222 (talk) 23:05, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

The standard modus operandi for biographies when a secondary source cannot be procured that can support personal details such as a date of birth is to exclude that completely from the article. That includes what we call "primary sources", of which census information would be a good example. You can read the policy here. And while I don't doubt your sincerity, we also don't allow personal recollections or knowledge, because information must be verifiable. That's why we don't have a DOB in that article, and many more in Wikipedia. If you produce a reliable source that provides the date then we would have no problem whatsoever with including it. Until then however, the DOB needs to be omitted. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 00:22, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Borderline edit war

hello i'm here asking for help. on article Cadillac ELR me and user gagu13 are obviously on a disagreement with the classification of the Cadillac ELR. he just INSISTS it is a sports car. i have asked for a discussion in the article's talk page and wrote on his talk page but no contribution from him.Thanks and I really hope this is sorted out quickly, Im really not sure what else to do regarding this. Among Men (talk) 01:22, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

@Among Men:: Take it to WP:DRN. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 15:11, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Andrew_Gilligan#Sockpuppeting

Hi,

I wonder if you could please respond to this; I disagreed with you, as has FreeRangeFrog; please don't misrepresent the discussion on Talk:Andrew_Gilligan#Sockpuppeting

ie could you please clarify if you think the BLP should state "Gilligan had engaged in sockpuppeting. Guardian journalist Dave Hill wrote about the allegations" based on the sources given.

Trying to seek consensus.

Thanks, 88.104.25.210 (talk) 01:42, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

editing Michael Dell history

I am removing or trying to remove somethings that have been posted about my daughter and cannot seem to get any help with removing those from the view history page there is numerous pages that have been edited with things about her and I would like them removed from the history any help would be appreciated.16:28, 21 October 2013 (UTC). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Upset4 (talk • contribs)

@Upset4: I understand, but that's not the way to do it. You're just making things worse. The revisions that contain the material have been just deleted, and I replied to the email message you sent us as well. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 16:30, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

headlice.org

Hi! You reverted an edit at Tea tree oil citing an opinion of the National Pediculosis Association suggesting to use the org's material instead. However headlice.org (the source used) is the official web site of the Association. What did you have in mind as an alternative? Alexbrn ^{talk|contribs|COI} 14:57, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

@Alexbrn: Heh, you're right. Got thrown off by the rather unprofessional looking website... but it seems you're right. Never mind my fiddling. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 15:10, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, it's a real taste of web design circa 1998! Alexbrn ^{talk|contribs|COI} 15:11, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

I think you'll find that the low quality website design is a bit of a clue. This is a wp:self published website. Self published websites aren't reliable sources for health advice.

Wikipedia is currently quoting a head louse association for stating that a particular chemical causes liver damage. That's what you reverted.Teapeat (talk) 15:49, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

@Teapeat: Realistically you should have taken this to WP:RS/N, not ANI. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:34, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited EU-Japan Centre for Industrial Cooperation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SMEs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Yo.

Yo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BitBus (talk • contribs) 21:20, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi? §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:32, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Angelo Antonio Toriello

Dear FreeRangeFrog kindly let it understand more why suddenly this article needs more citations and "potentially libelous" since it was recreated by you on 24 May 2013 and clearly states in the notes the situation of the "reliable sources". However, the few sources are quiet reliable, above the link of UN blue book about is current diplomatic position and status, therefore kindly be more specific about what has to be done to help it. Thanks. UNMD (talk) 02:54, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

I added the tag because there is a lot of content there that is not supported by citations. Please see WP:CITE. The "potentially libelous" part is not necessarily the case, it's just the wording on the tag. Just make sure that all the material there is correctly cited. Remember that anyone is free to challenge and remove any unsourced material from any article, and that's especially true for biographies. Better to add sources than to have someone simply remove the text. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 03:53, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi Again. Sorry to bother you, but because of your advanced experience, could you kindly point out parts of the article to be supported by citations as I went through the article, but I can't identify them as although the few same sources, the citations are all pointed from that same sources because of poor availability? I do really appreciate if you could kindly advice. Thanks again. UNMD (talk) 19:27, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

The last part of the third paragraph in the intro lacks a supporting citation, which is required when claiming someone is "controversial". Almost the entire "Early life" section lacks citations, A note like Early life off-line information are gathered from relatives, friends, journalists and some municipal corporation offices and other private and public sources. is not acceptable as a reference, you're essentially just accepting you don't have sources for the material, in which case I'd just as soon remove the entire section. See WP:V. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:53, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you FreeRangeFrog, this is professionalism and neutrality: suggesting things and not disputing or arguing for it. Your advices and guides are great. However, just browsing on the net I fund this link from an italian newspaper which confirms a certain past of the personality by the major of the town and the newspaper "La Citta" (http://lacittadisalerno.gelocal.it/cronaca/2013/10/29/news/s-severino-toriello-ambasciatore-onu-1.8018529) seems a reliable source. Kindly cast your advice if it could be sufficient. Regarding the "controversial" claim, as far as I could go through it is mentioned in one article by the Indian journalist/columnist Arvind Bandhari. Let me know how to point it out. Thanks again and regards.UNMD (talk) 11:12, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Eleanora Knopf

The DYK project (nominate) 16:04, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Like Nice! §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:53, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

ANI and you

Do you understand WP:ANI? In particular, the warnings every time you try to post something? About revdel and such? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:54, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

I do now. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 22:56, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks - sorry for overly blunt ranting :) --Demiurge1000 (talk) 00:08, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

No problem :) §FreeRangeFrog^croak 01:01, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Norwegian article

In case you are puzzled by what I posted to the article creator's talk page - that was also not a very nice thing to put up about someone. Yngvadottir (talk) 16:31, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, that too. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:05, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Mansions of Madness

Back in December 2012 you PRODded this, and it was deleted. Undeletion has now been requested at WP:REFUND, so per WP:DEL#Proposed deletion I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to consider AfD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:03, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

@JohnCD: Thanks for the heads up. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:04, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Howdy

Hi FRG, My thread at BLPN went unanswered so I'm approaching you individually. Would you have 10 minutes to look at this rather short BLPN Bevan Morris and make any edits that you feel are needed? To me it looks a little fluffy but I'd like a second opinion. Many thanks,-- — Keithbob • Talk • 14:42, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

@Keithbob: It's kinda puffy here and there and it seems he's the director of pretty much everything, but what's the concern? §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:04, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for taking a look. Listed some areas of concern thread here. But if you feel like it looks OK, then I'm OK too. Just wanted a second opinion. Cheers!-- — Keithbob • Talk • 17:53, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Vlad the Impaler: Thank you!

I thought you might find it amusing that I was in the middle of reverting the vandalism done to Vlad the Impaler when you got it done, just a moment before I did! Thanks for doing it. I didn't mind the juvenile humor the vandal added, but removing the REST of the useful info was unforgiveable. I don't know why people do such things.

Love your handle, FreeRangeFrog. Frogs are cool! I've had calendars featuring colorful photos of strange and beautiful frogs.

--Ben Culture (talk) 19:11, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Well, it's definitely good to know someone else is looking out for that page, for some reason it's a vandalism magnet. Thank you! §FreeRangeFrog^croak 22:35, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Viktor Sonnenfeld

Hello FreeRangeFrog,

why are you removing sourced info about Jewish heritage of Viktor Sonnenfeld? It is backed up by Croatian source written by known Croatian historian Zlata Živaković-Kerže, who specialises in Croatian-Jewish history. Soon I will add another source, from the book, that claims Sonnenfelds Jewish heritage. What are your sources for claiming that Viktor Sonnenfeld is a Roman Catholic? With regards, --SadarMoritz (talk) 11:17, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Rupert Taylor

Is no longer a prof at Wits, so that would make the lede inaccurate. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 23:18, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

You are right of course, I amended the intro to reflect that. I was mainly trying to get the "scandal" out of the intro. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 23:21, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! Jim1138 (talk) 23:31, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Centerville Delinquints Comment

Sorry, Free. Didn't mean to step on your toes. We must have been reading the same posting over at OTRS. I thought the thing warranted a speedy, but I like your note at AFD - let the admins decide. Cheers, mate! Geoff ^{Who, me?} 00:39, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Hah! Yeah, we were definitely reading the same email :) §FreeRangeFrog^croak 03:05, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

And it looks like we made the right choice, as the article has not only been speedied, but salted. Who'd a thunk it! Regards, Geoff ^{Who, me?} 02:43, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Jeff Schare

Well, since I am Jeff Schare, I can verify that the information you keep deleting is correct. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luca brasi1 (talk • contribs) 12:52, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

It doesn't matter, you still need a source. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 16:36, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

This one supports part of the statements, have a look. Best, Sam Sailor ^Sing 16:52, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

@Sam Sailor: Well found, thank you. I added that back (partially) to the article. So @Luca brasi1: that's what we were looking for. I hope you understand why by now. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:05, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Did you consider WP:BIO/WP:BIO1E for this article? Best, Sam Sailor ^Sing 17:54, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Well there is a comment in the talk page recommending a merge, so maybe that's the best course of action. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:13, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes, but merge how? I don't see any other officers being mentioned other than by name. Searching a bit[2] leads me to believe that this officer is the only one from the series with his own bio. Best, Sam Sailor ^Sing 18:31, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

@Sam Sailor: I was going to come back to this, but you beat me to the AFD. Good call. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:47, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. I think our roads have crossed in two auto-bios by now. That made me recall an article I never have returned to, but wanted to work on: Robert D. Scinto. Technically an autobio (in reality it's more likely the trainee down in the PR dept doing the writing, I guess). A six month jail sentence was initially left out. Have a look and lube the chainsaw. Best, Sam Sailor ^Sing 18:35, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jeff Schare, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Belt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

BLP board

Do you know how to fix the archive bot on this page? It's taking a while to load for me and old stuff hasn't been cleared out in a while.-Two kinds of pork (talk) 02:39, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

@Two kinds of pork: No idea. I haven't seen it archive in a while either, I'll try to see if I can figure it out. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 18:45, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

@Two kinds of pork: Looks like it's a known issue, bot is being replaced. See this. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 00:39, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, FreeRangeFrog. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.— DocTree (ʞlɐʇ·cont) Join WER 21:25, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Tarun Tejpal

Is it still just allegation when the man in question have admitted it, have apologized for it and have stepped down from the post of editor:-

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/accused-of-sexual-assault-by-staffer-tehelka-founder-steps-down-for-6-months/1197545/

http://news.oneindia.in/new-delhi/tehelka-shock-tarun-tejpal-steps-down-on-charges-sexual-harassment-1345038.html

http://www.deccanherald.com/content/370141/tarun-tejpal-quits-tehelka.html

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Tehelkas-editor-Tarun-Tejpal-steps-aside-after-incident-with-woman-journalist/articleshow/26112145.cms?

http://www.business-standard.com/article/current-affairs/tarun-tejpal-steps-down-for-6-months-as-editor-of-tehelka-113112000997_1.html http://blogs.outlookindia.com/default.aspx?ddm=10&pid=3084&eid=31

http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/tarun-tejpal-steps-down-as-tehelka-s-editor-for-six-months-over-alleged-sexual-assault-448746?curl=1384978956

http://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/tejpal-steps-down-as-tehelka-editor-for-six-months/article1-1153778.aspx

http://www.livemint.com/Consumer/l7JU2uIFUeILFLuv2vgyeL/Tarun-Tejpal-steps-down-as-Tehelka-editor-for-6-months.html

http://www.indileak.com/tehelkas-editor-tarun-tejpal-quits-after-sexual-assault-charge/

http://www.exchange4media.com/53529_tarun-tejpal-steps-down-as-tehelka-editor-for-six-months.html

Anmol.2k4 (talk) 20:46, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

I suggest you join the discussion here. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:57, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Raul Julia-Levy

Hi Frog, I hope this finds you well. You added http://businessofcinema.com/international-news/hollywood-legend-raul-julia-has-a-new-successor-his-oldest-son-raul-julialevy/15345 as a ref again. It was one of those I took out and left a msg on the tp about. Do you find it reliable? Best, Sam Sailor ^Sing 20:45, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

@Sam Sailor: Ah, didn't notice that. No, it doesn't strike me as particularly reliable but... it's the only one that supports the "philanthropy" assertion directly. Unless we consider that to be implicit in the animal rights advocacy, which is thin enough as it is. I'll take it out. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:48, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Repost of Alex Bellini

A tag has been placed on Alex Bellini requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you.

Hi Frog.

Sorry but i don't understand why the page I just posted should be deleted. The info I posted are included in the sources, which was the problem why the page was cancelled the first time.

Plus it is just a line, objective, sober... can you explain to me the reason why it should be erased? Or what should I do to make it so that this doesn't happen?

Thank you

The article was deleted 12 days ago by consensus after a discussion, and thus should not be posted again unless the reasons for the deletion have been substantially invalidated, which I doubt is the case here. In any event, the reviewing admin will decide whether or not the article should be removed. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 00:45, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Balance And Composure

Hello FreeRangeFrog. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Balance And Composure, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: this is more than a garage band, sufficient to pass A7. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:03, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

@Martijn Hoekstra: Looks like they added more material to at least assert minimal importance, so good on them. Thanks for letting me know. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 16:17, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

David Labrava

Fair enough :) Lady Lotus • talk 20:48, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Cheers §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:49, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, FreeRangeFrog. You have new messages at Lady Lotus's talk page.
Message added 20:57, 11 December 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Lady Lotus • talk 20:57, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

re Shannon Leto entry

Hi, thanks for your message re my edit on the Shannon Leto entry. I have reason to doubt that Shannon and Jared Leto's birth name is Bryant - hence my qualification of the original entry which cited the birthname of Bryant. The attribution derives from an entry for Constance Metrejon on Ancestry.com, although the link cited actually points to someone's blog. I won't bore you with my easons for doubting that this is the correct Constance Metrejon (unless you want me to), but would you be able to edit the entry for Jared Leto to remove the statement that his birthname is Bryant? I don't have permission to do so.

The second part of my edit was to do with the surname Leto. I may not have written it in an acceptable style, but the link I provided was to Melissa Lafsky's statement that Jared and Shannon Leto are her step-brothers. Admittedly it is quoted in someone's blog, but if this isn't an acceptable source for a statement, I don't really see what is, especially if the result of someone's personal research posted in a blog is acceptable. Might I point out that journalists don't always get their facts right so citing them as a reference might not be acceptable either? Regards Jarrit29 (talk) 19:45, 16 December 2013 (UTC)Jarrit29

@Jarrit29: Thanks for your message. My problem with the material was the reliability of the source. For example, I keyed in the mother's name plus "Bryant" and one site supposedly showing Texas marriage records popped up with something that might support the Polish site's assertion, but nothing in the way of more mainstream sources. That worries me because I would think that if this is factual information regarding the Leto brothers there would be quite a few more sources covering it. Remember that for BLPs we look for better sources than we'd want in other types of articles. All this might very well be true, but we can't rely on marriage records, and ancestry.com is generally eschewed as a source for these types of things. As to statements by other people, imagine if we covered everything that everyone said about notable persons. If someone is claiming to be their step sister that's fine, but we need evidence of secondary coverage of those claims in order for it to be included in the article(s). And for Jared Leto, I will comment on the talk page and see if some of the regulars agree with my assessment of this material. Cheers! §FreeRangeFrog^croak 16:44, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Just to clarify - I did not put the Bryant name onto either Shannon or Jared Leto's page, but thought it too presumptuous of me to remove it all together, hence I edited it to say it was unconfirmed. I'm fine with you removing it all together as I actually think it is completely wrong. I'm pretty certain the Leto connection is correct, although you will probably struggle to get secondary confirmation of it, even though there are plenty of comments about from people who knew the Leto family at high school. Jarrit29 (talk) 21:50, 17 December 2013 (UTC)Jarrit29

@Jarrit29: Ah, then I placed a notice on your talk page by mistake. My apologies. It looks like the claims have already been removed from Jared Leto as well, and it makes sense because we can't rely on what sources we do have for them. In any case, don't ever think removing unsourced (or badly sourced) information from biographies is presumptuous, on the contrary! In those cases it should be shoot first and ask questions later :) Cheers! §FreeRangeFrog^croak 22:02, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

@FreeRangeFrog: Did you see that on 17 Dec. a message from someone claiming to be Jared Leto's legal representative asked for the Tony Bryant reference to be removed from both Jared and Shannon Leto's page as it was incorrect?Jarrit29 (talk) 22:24, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Jarrit29

@Jarrit29: Yes. You would be surprised (or maybe not since it's fairly obvious from the talk pages) that the band's reps have been traditionally all over these articles, here and via OTRS. Not saying that's a bad thing, but they do tend to get involved. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 19:33, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:Sissy Lappin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User talk:Sissy Lappin, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Peridon (talk) 16:32, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

One of the joys of talk page creation is that the wrong person gets the warning... My apologies. I think we're going to have to block her soon. Peridon (talk) 16:35, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

@Peridon: No problem :) §FreeRangeFrog^croak 16:50, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Response to Message

Thank you for your message regarding the edit that I had done on the page of Jose Huizar. It was my first time editing a page, so I apologize for not leaving a comment on why the edit was done. I did the edit because the post contained allegations that are currently being investigated and dealt with by the Los Angeles City Council and within our judicial courts, so in having the content up at this time creates a bias description of an allegation that is still being unraveled. So can I get your help in how to leave a proper comment on the edit? I will try again and see if I leave a comment that fits the guidelines. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Agutierr07 (talk • contribs) 19:31, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

BioMarin

Hi Frog:

I understand that you feel very strongly about the BioMarin issue, but I went to some significant effort to explain my point of view on the Talk page, and why I think your reversion was inappropriate. Rather than engaging in disucssion, you simply reverted my edit wtihout giving any reason. I don't know if this is technically a violation of Wikipedia's edit warring policy, but it is certainly not in the spirit of the rules.

I'd appreciate it if you reconsider your position and engage on the Talk page. That being said I'd like to wish you a Merry Christmas.

Best Regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.155.21.76 (talk) 12:04, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your kind remarks. It good to make your acquaintance. I have a registered acccount BTW, but have stopped using it for reasons too complicated to explain other than to say I've never been blocked or anything like that. I'll consider setting up a new account. Many thanks98.155.21.76 (talk) 12:14, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alexander I. Roitbak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

The End Of Grace

Good evening.

I'm sorry, I confess I didn't read the criteria regarding whether or not a band should have its own article on Wikipedia. I've always thought that an encyclopedia was a complete compendium, that it didn't regard the importance of the subject, just its existence. As The End Of Grace has published one work which is on sale on iTunes and CDON.com, meaning they're not some unplubished garage band, I truly thought that was enough to create a page about them. Also as webzines are more and more popular nowadays, I thought the articles in the British Valkyrian Music and the Swedish Rockbladet would corroborate the history of the band that I submitted. Should I try again when they release the full-length album? Or should I try and post it in Swedish in the Swedish Wikipedia, as I've noticed they have many articles about small national bands that haven't a correspondent article in English? Like Seventribe, for instance, with whom The End Of Grace are precisely to tour with next year? Thank you in advance for your time.

Pieni156 (talk) 22:33, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

@Pieni156: No, there are two basic thresholds for inclusion. First, the initial article must assert a minimal claim of importance. That was not present in your submission, which is why it was "speedily" deleted. Beyond that, even if there is a valid claim of importance, the article can still be deleted if it does not meet the notability guidelines for inclusion, which are here. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:38, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

BLP issues in comments at BLPN

Maybe it's borderline, maybe it isn't... but I think it is likely that portions of your comments about Phil Robertson at BLPN (which I have undertaken to clean up) are potentially defamatory. Please try to find ways to make your point without carelessly adding such insinuations. It's not necessary. Roccodrift (talk) 00:12, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

We discuss much thicker fare at BPLN - we don't censor ourselves and certainly don't edit other people's comments unless it's something that requires revdel or something like that. I was merely asking if the concern with the material is because the wife was 16 when she got married, which is not "defamatory" because that is the likely age of consent wherever they got married - and even if it wasn't, discussing an issue is not defamatory per se. Next time we get a bio where the subject is accused of sexual assault (which happens every other day), should we write in code so we don't defame the subject? Just don't do it again, please. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 00:30, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Request to revert

Hi, could you please reinstate the edits we made to the Judge Rotenberg Center page; in the next few days we will be adding new info to reference the topics formerly seen in the header that you changed back to; for now we'd like to give info in the header on what JRC does, not on the controversial history (which will be discussed in upcoming changes). Please contact me for more info. Thank you! Judgerc (talk) 21:41, 6 January 2014 (UTC)judgerc

@Judgerc: You add the references when you add the material, please. More importantly, you seem to have a conflict of interest here, so your edits must be especially clear. You removed information that seems negative and was correctly sourced. You are free to improve the article, but please use the talk page to requests those types of changes, or don't do them at all. See WP:PSCOI and Wikipedia:Edit_requests for more information. I also highly suggest you abandon your current account and create a new one to avoid being blocked. See WP:ISU as well for that. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:49, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, FreeRangeFrog. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Wikilinking

Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:

• dates
• years
• commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
• common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

Thanks and my best wishes.

Tony (talk) 10:16, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

@Tony1: huh, sorry, not sure what this is about. Like a dab notice? Did I link to this somewhere while I was editing?? §FreeRangeFrog^croak 14:42, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Matthew Levin (diplomat)

Hello, FreeRangeFrog,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Matthew Levin (diplomat) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Levin (diplomat) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Itsalleasy (talk) 03:25, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Check out an article?

I saw that you were somewhat involved with the article Scott Neitlich in its previous incarnation, where the editor pretty much blanked the page. Long story short, the editor was sort of spamming for the guy's website. Maybe intentionally, maybe unintentionally, but the edits for some of his deleted articles were pretty bad. He's temporarily blocked for this (initially permanent but gave him the benefit of the doubt) and I'm trying to see if this guy would pass notability guidelines. He's got an assertion to it and I can see where he's mentioned in places, but I don't see anything that's really in-depth. Most of it is mentions of website exclusives for his company, but there are some interviews with him in places that don't really seem to pass our RS guidelines. I've asked the comic WP to take a look, but I'm still really unsure of this guy's notability. I trust your opinion, so I thought I'd ask you to take a look. I removed a lot from the article, so take a look at the article's history as well. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:29, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

@Tokyogirl79: I would say the subject is just below or barely above what I'd consider to pass GNG at this point, honestly. Given what I found in Google and what's on the article, were it land at AFD I couldn't say which way the consensus would go. Perhaps it's that the notability is limited to a rather niche area? §FreeRangeFrog^croak 02:57, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

• That was kind of my opinion as well- it's the type of thing that I'd maybe argue a weak keep for at best. I think that the niche coverage is pretty much the reason for the lack of RS. Any idea of where we could redirect this to? I don't think his website is really notable enough to warrant its own article and I don't think that we have a "list of Mattel employees" section anywhere to redirect to either. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:35, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stevie Salas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Producer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 10 January 2014 (UTC)