Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kiran chandani (talk | contribs) at 01:09, 11 September 2015 (→Starkillers: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases


float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

Rishi Bisen

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 49.202.43.214 (talk) 11:07, 2 September 2015 (UTC)Rishi Bisen is an officer of Indian Revenue Service. He belongs to 2010 i.e. 64th batch if IRS. Mr. Bisen has done Bachelor of Engineering with Metallurgical Engineering branch from Govt. Engineering College Raipur which is now NIT Raipur. Before joining this service he worked in commercial tax and police department in Madhya Pradesh Government for short period. After completing his training from National Academy of Direct Taxes, Nagpur he started his carrier as Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, in MP-CG region.[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
I have to say that I do not see any indication that Mr Bisen is notable enough, in Wikipedia's sense, to have an article. Please check out WP:Notability (people). JohnCD (talk) 20:28, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:59.101.115.147

Criteria for deletion no longer applies. We would like to see the contents. Please restore. -103.6.159.87 (talk) 17:22, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Paging MZMcBride as the deleting admin to help shed light on the issue. Unless something else has happened, "OldIPTalkPage" is still valid and therefore you need to provide more information 103IP. Hasteur (talk) 17:37, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There was nothing useful or interesting there, only a single level-1 vandalism warning from April 2007. JohnCD (talk) 21:23, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Who's we? --MZMcBride (talk) 19:46, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia

I moved a wikiproject and created a new one in its place because the previous one was inactive. I acknowledge that I did that incorrectly but now, the project I created in the old project's place was deleted and the old project was moved back. I have hours of code and frmatting invested and I would like that back. So i would appreciate it if you could restore my version and its three subpages (Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia/Members,Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia/Contests, Wikipedia:WikiProject Wikipedia/Awards) and all of their talk pages into User:Tortle/Sandbox 2 so I can retrieve the code and possibly get it ready for a new name. Thanks -Tortle (talk) 20:52, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I recommend not restoring Tortle's new material until all of the original WikiProject has been restored and associated edits with its temporary renames (from WikiProject Wikipedia to Wikipedia:Defunct WikiProject Wikipedia and then to WikiProject Improving Wikipedia) have been corrected. Tortle's contribution to fixing these edits would be welcome and speed up the process. Liz <font face="Times New Roman" color="#006400"Read! Talk! 23:11, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I will gladly help fix the original wikiproject and revert me edits, in fact, Ill start once I finish writing this but I do not see the benefit on waiting to restore the pages until cleanup of something else is done as that will just get my request buried over here. Thanks Tortle (talk) 23:28, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
All of the reverts are done User:Liz. I would appreciate if you or another admin can review my request. Tortle (talk) 01:17, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Tortle, I'm not sure exactly how to move the old page history, to be honest, since restoring it would just restore it to that specific page. I don't think that there's a way to move specific page histories. I know that RHaworth deleted it and he has more experience with undeletion, so I'm going to tag him and see if he knows how to do it (and can then tell me how to do it as well). I also have to admit that I'm slightly concerned that you're taking on what looks like it'd be a fairly big project, considering that you're a very new user with less than 3,000 edits. This doesn't mean that I won't do it, just more that I'm curious as to why you chose to do something like this as one of your first big projects. Mostly I just kind of want to hear the reason for it and if you have someone helping you with this, preferably someone who is used to creating new WikiProjects. Jusdafax looks like he'd be down for the task, as does several of the people at the WikiProject Council. Making a new WikiProject is a huge, HUGE effort and I'd greatly prefer that you at least have a mentor on call for this. Again, not saying no and the major issue here is just that I'm not sure how to (or if we can) move a deleted edit history or if we just have to cut/paste the content, but I would feel better knowing that you have someone to help you with the overall details. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:03, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I was on Wikipedia some years back and I gained a lot of experience back then but honestly have lost some of it. I already set up the wikiproject page and I definetely do plan on getting some good members on board to help things along and give some good suggestions. And anyway, I might wait a while before rebooting it and by then, I would have more expreience. Thanks for responding so quickly and it was nice meeting you Tokyogirl79. Tortle (talk) 07:08, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Tokyogirl79, Im going to be making a lot of changes and starting fresh and mainly need the code. Is there a way for you to view the code and copy and paste it into my sandbox? Or is that not allowed or an issue? Thanks Tortle (talk) 07:15, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Tokyogirl79, I mainly didnt want to add myself into the reviewer section because I wanted a place to explain that I could delete disruptive reviewers from the project but I think I could add myself as a reviewer and say that reviewers can decide to get rid of another with a vote or by consensus. Thanks again, Tortle (talk) 07:33, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • They are in the WP namespace - we don't need to have long discussions agonising over restoration. I have restored all Tortle's edits in the Wikipedia and Wikipedia_talk namespaces. I view service awards such as {{Looshpah IV Userbox}} and barnstars as out of keeping with the "grown-up" serious state that Wikipedia has now reached but if Tokyogirl or Liz (talk · contribs), who did several if not all their deletions, is willing to restore, then I have no objection. Tortle, try and use "show preview" more - the number of edits seem out of proportion to the actual work being done. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:25, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have some concerns with that statement Tortle, Wikipedia is not a democracy. Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Guide/WikiProject#Inappropriate exclusivity describes why membership statuses and exclusivity are inappropriate. Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Guide/WikiProject#Control and organization explains the egalitarian more loosely associated nature of WikiProjects: Coordinators cannot be "forced" on an unwilling WikiProject — there must be consensus amongst its membership that the introduction of a coordination system will benefit the project and coordinators are not arbitrators or "leaders" of a WikiProject — all such decisions are still made by community consensus sum it up pretty well. Starting a WikiProject will not give you special status or "powers" within it, and the project will belong to the community.—Godsy(TALKCONT) 12:04, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Niku Dutta

I, 117.243.210.26, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 117.243.210.26 (talk) 22:30, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vader - Reborn in Chaos

This is a compilation album by Vader, the so called administrator who deleted the page has a history of deleting valid pages. More info on the album, including album artwork http://www.metal-archives.com/albums/Vader/Reborn_in_Chaos/17719 and also on the bands official website here http://www.vader.pl/reborn-e.html Cannot request the administrator to do this because he/she is a troll and has been inactive for years -84.203.56.111 (talk) 00:14, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is going to be a technical Not done because there's really nothing to restore here. The reason it was deleted was because of no context and looking at the content, I can see why it was deleted as such. It was only a list of tracks and no other information about the album. It didn't even come close to being an article and restoring it would pretty much require someone to instantly write a new article from scratch. It'd be much better for you to create a new article yourself. You can do this by going through AfC (if you don't want to sign up for an account) or signing up with an account (or into an account if you already have one) and creating the page. Just make sure that it would pass notability guidelines per WP:NALBUM, as musical albums are not automatically notable because the band that created them is notable. On a side note, I would really like to ask that you assume good faith about other editors. While I'm not familiar with this now inactive admin, this particular deletion does not give off the impression of any abuse, nor does their talk page show any overwhelming evidence of abuse. It's generally considered to be very poor manners to come in here and write something that can very easily be taken as an WP:ADHOMINEM attack against another person. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:35, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Google X

This page was deleted to make way for an article about an unrelated topic, however, it should be undeleted and should be added a disambiguation tag. (Unsure what exactly) - TheChampionMan1234 01:44, 3 September 2015 (UTC) -- TheChampionMan1234 01:44, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • @TheChampionMan1234: The old article looks like it was deleted at AfD back in 2013, since it closed as a merge to List of Google products#Discontinued products and services. From what I can see, it looks like this is already in the list of discontinued products. There really isn't much to restore and I'm not really certain that we truly need a disambiguation page, to be honest. It looks like we only have two entries with this specific name and the AfD closed with the consensus that while it merited a page somewhere, it didn't really warrant its own entry. While he's not an admin, I do want to ping @Mz7: since he did a non-admin close. The page was redirected and this redirect was deleted by @Timrollpickering:, so I'll ping him as well. Again, I just really don't know that this needs a separate entry outside of where it's already mentioned. Maybe a hatnote at the top of the current article at most. Here's the content of the page:

Google X was a project released by Google Labs on March 15, 2005 and rescinded a day later. It consisted of the traditional Google search bar, but it was made to look like the Dock user interface feature of Apple's Mac OS X operating system.[1] Google did not release any official statement as to why the project was shut down. Although Google X has been taken down, several mirrors still exist. [2]

That's pretty much about it and given that this went through AfD (and there's really not enough to justify a disambiguation page), I'd prefer that we have the OK from the person who closed the AfD. He's not an admin, but I do trust his opinion enough to want his OK on this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:46, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Tokyogirl79, TheChampionMan1234, and Timrollpickering: Thanks for the ping. The consensus at AfD was that the topic was not notable enough for a standalone article, so unless it can be shown that significant new information about the subject has been released or discovered since the AfD closed, that consensus should continue to have merit. As Tokyogirl79 mentions, essentially everything that was contained in the former article has been merged to List of Google products#Discontinued products and services, so creating a standalone article without significant new information would be redundant. I would also agree with Tokyogirl that a disambiguation page is probably unnecessary. There would only be two entries, and Google X (the secret facility) is obviously the primary topic. If disambiguation is absolutely necessary, a hatnote would be preferred.
However, (and this is going to sound like me being a stickler for procedure, but I think it's important), Wikipedia's content licensing requires that all content be attributed to its respective authors. This attribution is usually supplied by the edit history of a page, which lists all the authors' names. When you copy text from one Wikipedia page to another (such as when merging content), certain steps need to be taken—the guideline for this is at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. The bare minimum is a link to the source page in the edit summary at the destination page. But, this only works if the source page's edit history still exists with the names of the authors. When Timrollpickering deleted the redirect at Google X, they also deleted the history of the Google X page, which contained the names of the authors of the merged content. This means that at the moment, the merged content about the discontinued 2005 Google X project at List of Google products is technically a copyright violation.
I think the easiest solution is to undelete the former page as a redirect at Google X (discontinued project) or Google X (project), so that the page history (and the attribution) is preserved. Mz7 (talk) 19:06, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:SwimSafe

I, BelAThompson, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. BelAThompson (talk) 02:05, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Gender and Sustainability

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Karin Steen (talk) 08:19, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brent_Braselton

Article was work in progress, Yet to cite sources and was deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by RouterWhisper (talk • contribs) 10:56, 3 September 2015‎

@RouterWhisper: Not done and will not be done. Wikipedia is not a place for people to write "jokey" articles about themselves and their friends. Read the policy on WP:Biographies of living persons. JohnCD (talk) 11:16, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Aimée Cornwell

I, Julesgreg, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I was only just notified today that it was considered for deletion and went back to it to edit it again. But it had gone. -Julesgreg (talk) 11:38, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Julesgreg: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:47, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@JohnCD: Draft was deleted per G13 by @Mackensen: an hour later. --Finngall talk 03:48, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@JohnCD and Finngall: I wasn't aware of this discussion and the speedy tag wasn't removed when the article was restored. I've restored it and removed the tag. Mackensen (talk) 04:17, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about that - I should be able to do these restorations correctly in my sleep by now, but perhaps I was just doing it in my sleep... JohnCD (talk) 08:18, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Program for Research In Mathematics, Engineering and Science (PRIMES)

I, Dodecahedronic, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dodecahedronic (talk) 14:46, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dodecahedronic: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:The Program for Research In Mathematics, Engineering and Science (PRIMES). Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 15:30, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ahsan Ali Taj

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Mohsin Ali Taj (talk) 00:09, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Matinbox: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:31, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
However, Matinbox. I have also deleted the entry for this topic you created in the article mainspace, after you made the above request. I deleted it under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion as it was blatantly promotional – something that the undeleted draft also suffers from. Please remove all the puffery, peacock language, statements of opinion about his virtue and so on, and include only facts that reliable sources can back up (without copying their words).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:36, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hunt Monitor

<long article text removed> — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zinfandelorganic (talk • contribs) 07:53, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Zinfandelorganic:  Not done This is not the place to post the text of your article. It was deleted because its original author was identified as one of a group of paid editors/scammers creating, and pretending to be able to protect, articles for money. You should consult the deleting administrator, Timotheus Canens (talk). JohnCD (talk) 08:35, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note that the original page is still at Draft:Hunt Monitors. You are welcome to add your improvements to that. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:52, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dr Mohd Fouzuddin

I, Shaandon, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Shaandon (talk) 11:20, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:European Language Equality Network (2)

I, Branwalather99, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Branwalather99 (talk) 12:28, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Branwalather99: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia..
Wikipedia's inclusion criterion, called Wikipedia:Notability, looks for references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject", i.e. not just press releases or the project's own material. The test is whether people not connected with it have found it sufficiently interesting or important to write substantial content about it. JohnCD (talk) 13:59, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

John Melmer

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -192.152.249.253 (talk) 13:21, 4 September 2015 (UTC) I am asking that this particular page be accepted into Wikipedia. Thanks for your consideration.[reply]

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Melmer, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Mkdw (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Hasteur (talk) 13:42, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dan Price photo.png

OTRS received. Please undelete. -Willy Weazley 23:43, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, image restored and tagged. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:14, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

uranipuram

This article is about an uranipuram village and it will help the people to know about the village -Anish hs (talk) 10:50, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, you're asking for the U5-speedied revisions to be restored? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 16:37, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ogik Francis Peter

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Ogik Francis Peter (talk) 16:08, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (NeilN (talk · contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a resume hosting service; I will note that you have been warned for repeatedly posting it here. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 16:36, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Buymore Limited

I, Smartjon, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Smartjon (talk) 19:36, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It was declined and later deleted since it lacked citation and references, back then. I am happy to announce now there are multiple notable sources on the subject and hence I request permission to be allowed to proceed to edit and resubmit for clearance -Smartjon (talk) 19:51, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Smartjon, this is a technical Not done since the article contained content that was fairly promotional in tone, although I am willing to e-mail you a copy of the article. You'd have to take these portions out in order to make it neutral. An example is the phrase "Buymore is at the heart of the social media users and thus it strives to maintain a rapport and communicate events as they unfold directly to its customers via its twitter (@BuymoreCard) and Facebook (BuymoreKenya) platforms." Also, are you involved with the company in any form or fashion? I ask this because normally articles that sound promotional like this are promotional because they're written by someone involved with marketing, the article topic, or were otherwise asked/paid to create the article. You can still edit if this is the case, but you will need to disclose this COI on your userpage by stating that you are a paid editor (or whatever the COI is) and (if you are making non-paid edits along with paid edits) the titles of the articles you were asked to create. You can read more about this at WP:COI. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:02, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Another note: try to only include one official website in the external links section. You had nine links, which comes across as WP:ELSPAM. Typically you should only have the primary official website in the EL section since the official website should have links to their social media accounts - Wikipedia should not be used as a hub for these sites, nor should it contain the social media links for people involved with the company. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:04, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Barwal Rajput

I, 2.223.168.64, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2.223.168.64 (talk) 21:48, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Advances in Group Theory and Applications

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Francesco de Giovanni (talk) 22:24, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Advances in Group Theory and Applications" is a new journal, but its editorial board, which is listed in the journal web page is formed by 13 very well-known mathematicians from several different countries, considered as the best world expert on the field. Their quality can for instance be checked either using the MathSciNet data base of the American Mathematical Society or the Mathematics Genealogy Project. It is reasonable that in the next few years the journal will have a prominent role in the mathematical world. The theory of groups is one of the most relevant topic of algebra (its foundation being due to Evariste Galois in 1831) Thanks for your consideration, Francesco de Giovanni (2006 Honorary degree as Doctor of Science from the National University of Ireland)

  • Not done This article is currently up for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advances in Group Theory and Applications, so it does not fall under REFUND criteria. If it is deleted then you will have to petition the deleting administrator for the article's return and if they decline, go through WP:REFUND. However that said, right now the best time to try to save the article is in the here and now, so you need to argue for inclusion at the AfD discussion. I'll warn you: it's extremely difficult to argue for inclusion for journals since most times new journals will not gain coverage in RS nor will they tend to be included in notable indexing services unless they're through an extremely reputable organization or company. (IE, places that likely already have notability themselves and are already well established.) I note that this is an open access journal, which usually makes it even more difficult to establish notability, especially if it's newly founded. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:10, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chieftec

This article was PRODed with my alternative account when I was still a WP:Newbie and did not understand notability guidelines. The topic passes WP:GNG. -sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 03:07, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Axial Flow Combines

I, Jamesbushell.au, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jamesbushell.au (talk) 05:22, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TOM EARLEY

I, 86.153.147.6, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 86.153.147.6 (talk) 06:04, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Team Secret

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Edwin Hale (talk) 10:01, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Hello,

I am a technological cretin and not very competent at constructing new pages. Nonetheless, I have contributed over many years, both whole articles and regular corrections.

I do not play computer games but my attention was drawn to a particularly successful team led by Clement "Puppey" Ivanov which has succeeded in winning over $1.5 million in prize money over the past 18 months. I believe that wikipedia needs to show references to such teams as to any teams or competitors in major sports, written in laymen's terms.

I realise that my original entry was short of references but give me time! I am a busy man and the entry was deleted too soon for me to draw in the necessary additional information and references, some, but not all of which can be found on other wikis.

International Project Management Association

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Qianbang (talk) 10:31, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

we updated IPMA´s Wikipedia presence and some guys (?) from North-America want to delete the site.

IPMA is an international professional Association with more than 60 contries Memeber associations. All us need to keep this and we will edit it often

  • Not done Qianbang, This is currently at AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Project Management Association. If this is deleted at AfD this will not be something that could be restored through REFUND. Also, you will need to show that the organization is notable by showing where it has received coverage in independent and reliable sources such as news articles or similar. Just existing as an organization, even an international one, is not something that would show notability in and of itself. Also, please be aware that anyone can edit Wikipedia and while your comments do not explicitly show that you are trying to exert WP:OWNERSHIP of the page, it does somewhat give off that impression. In general Wikipedia discourages people from editing articles that they have a direct conflict of interest with, as it's very, very easy for people to make promotional sounding edits or take deletion or changes a bit too personally. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 10:37, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nithya Menen Malli malli idi rani roju making.jpeg

Please undelete then move to commons. -Willy Weazley 14:33, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Willy Weazley: See my note on the OTRS ticket. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:37, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
no Declined for now. The OTRS ticket shows no evidence that the sender is the copyright holder. At this point it's basically an anonymous email, untraceable to the company Creative Commercials it purports to represent. Feel free to make another request when such evidence is given. ~Amatulić (talk) 05:23, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:QualiTest Logo.jpg

Please undelete. Thanks. -Willy Weazley 14:42, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, restored and tagged. Please double-check my tagging. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:49, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stephen Watson Speaking at a BMW Event in 2012.jpg

Please undlete. OTRS received. -Willy Weazley 14:49, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Done, restored and tagged. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:53, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Railways E-Procurment Systems (IREPS)

I wanted to review and will make changes as per its existing condition. I am working for IREPS and wanted its presence online and wiki is the best place people look after, it a very popular website in Indian Railways -223.176.239.88 (talk) 15:34, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We have zero tolerance for being used for SEO/advertising. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 16:10, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nevertheless, @Jéské Couriano: WP:AFC is the appropriate venue for an editor with a conflict of interest to submit an article. That said, I'd feel better about restoring it if the request came from a registered user account that clearly disclosed its paid-editing affiliation. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:20, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Amatulic: I intend it more as a warning not to view Wikipedia as a place to advertise, given what the requestor said indicates he only cares about Wikipedia because of its Alexa ranking. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:53, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Nasher%27s_Stool_At_The_Bell_Inn&action=edit&redlink=1

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 151.229.171.147 (talk) 16:06, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 16:12, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Medisaid/"The fifth dimension equation"

I, Medisaid, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I would like to undelete my article because I want to take some lost informations from it. Also, after two times my articles was delete, i would appreciate if you can tell me precisely whats wrong about it. I dont want to make advertising, i juste want to put my work in a link. Tell me how to do it please. Dear regards. -Medisaid (talk) 16:59, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Medisaid:  Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request, so you can recover information from it; but I am afraid that there is no chance this will be accepted for the encyclopedia. The reason is that it is your own original work, but Wikipedia is not a place to publish original work. Please read Wikipedia:No original research, which includes:

"If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to announce such a discovery. "

JohnCD (talk) 19:49, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bwin.svg

I am restoring the Bwin article as an article on the historical company. The logo is necessary for the infobox. -Cloudbound (talk) 18:26, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cloudbound:  Done. Please add it to the article a.s.a.p. JohnCD (talk) 19:53, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, already done. Cloudbound (talk) 19:54, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mary Bettwy

I, 68.8.121.146, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 68.8.121.146 (talk) 00:55, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am still in the process of retrieving additional primary sources to establish that Mary Bettwy was a well-known public figure in Arizona; females were not as well documented at the time -68.8.121.146 (talk) 00:57, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Example

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 1.187.128.52 (talk) 05:30, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Forum on Information Standards in Heritage

I, 31.222.211.51, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 31.222.211.51 (talk) 10:27, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atreides_(album)

The administration deleted it hastily in less than 24hrs of the notice so I was not able to challenge it. After reviewing the case, he/she asked me to request this undeletion. -Discog79 (talk) 10:56, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:AstroCourthouseFacilityDog.jpg

Boilerplate release received 2015-07-28. Please restore with {{cc-by-sa-3.0|attribution=David Walsen}}{{GFDL|migration=redundant}} if plausible (no reason for me to suspect otherwise). Thanks! -Storkk (talk) 13:47, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks, Graeme! (And apologies: I should have linked to ticket:2015072810025103 for future reference). Storkk (talk) 07:15, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

trifid(Research)

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Rajnishtrifid (talk) 15:03, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done and will not be done Wikipedia is not a place to advertise your company. JohnCD (talk) 15:56, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

chandra jyoti chakma

I don't know how to delated my artcle - — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chandra jyoti chakma (talk • contribs) 17:01, 7 September 2015

@Chandra jyoti chakma:  Not done. Wikipedia is not a place for you to write about yourself. Please read Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors. JohnCD (talk) 17:26, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

KONI Group

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Regushee (talk) 21:56, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion G11. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user RHaworth (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Also pinging NawlinWiki and Human3015 who also felt the same way. Hasteur (talk) 22:04, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think creator now created redirect for it, I think that is ok now. Previous article was written in promotional manner. I hope Regushee will add some sources in target article. --Human3015TALK  22:39, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
...if allowed time to do so...(Regushee (talk) 22:41, 7 September 2015 (UTC))[reply]

:::@Regushee: ya, time is allowed to you. Don't take it in bad faith, we are not against you or against any new editors, we encourage new editors. You can use WP:Sandbox to prepare your matter with sources. You can see option "Sandbox" on right upper side in between "talk" and "Preferences". --Human3015TALK  22:48, 7 September 2015 (UTC)he is not new--Human3015TALK  22:53, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adonnis

I, License2Kill, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. License2Kill (talk) 22:12, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion A7, indicating an article that did not explain or prove why the subject was notable. A7 deletions are not overturned here; try contacting the deleting administrator (RHaworth (talk · contribs)) instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Actually I suspect the page in question is Draft:Adonnis which is not deleted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:26, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly so, License2Kill requested undeletion of the draft nearly six months ago and did not go on to do anything to it. I gave them a gentle prod to suggest working on it to avoid losing it, and they... came here instead. Rankersbo (talk) 10:37, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aquarian Family Festival

important Subject : fraud & politics

@Xb2u7Zjzc32: Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aquarian Family Festival, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Xymmax (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.

Starkillers

The article seems to have been deleted based on merely a few comments and questioning of source. There's ample evidence of any info that was on the article. The original editors of the article (who I am unaware of) may have gotten a few spellings wrong. This can be easily fixed. No reason to delete an entire article. Its Starkillers true life journey through music. He has had 12 no. 1 beatport records and has been a producer/dj in the music industry for over 15 years. This article was deleted based on not enough credibility to be on Wikipedia? Please rethink this. Its someone's life and career story. If needed, any piece of info in question on the article can be verified by any individuals mentioned directly in the article or any further info required to ensure the info is 100% true. This is unfair to delete a world Renowned artist's life story based on apparently un-sited 1 or 2 pieces of info. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brawlarecords (talk • contribs) 05:47, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Military Cyber Professionals Association

I, Uconngijoe, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Uconngijoe (talk) 06:22, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:LubovGazov.jpeg

Pursuant to ticket:2015071010005177 please undelete File:LubovGazov.jpeg with {{OTRS received|id=2015071010005177}} and {{cc-by-sa-4.0}}. It is not crystal clear that this is the file in question, but hopefully we can clear this up soon. Thanks, Storkk (talk) 07:49, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lemondo Entertainment

I, Levandoc, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Levandoc (talk) 10:35, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Levandoc: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Lemondo Entertainment. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 12:06, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ambix

I, 62.232.37.162, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 62.232.37.162 (talk) 12:51, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thee have been a number of new developments and external references that I can now use, so I intend to restructure the article to reflect more of the research and history behind us (cf ThoughtFarmer in particular, very similar story)

Yep that's me! Shall I rewrite and submit as a completely new article in that case? - Kate — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.232.37.162 (talk) 13:13, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Sounds good! The key portion that really needed re-writing was the product section, since it came across a little buzzword-y. If you need any help with this, let me know. I'm guessing that you are likely someone in marketing and I know that it can be difficult to pick out specific phrases/words because you just get used to them. It wasn't bad-bad, but it just needed a little work. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:32, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Michael Schluter

I, Joshuahemmings, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Joshuahemmings (talk) 14:20, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Joshuahemmings: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 14:38, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Aleksandar Basic - Bašić

Enter your reasoning here My page is not is not an advertising page. This is a page about my artistic work and history of work. If I have to be dead to be published as an artist on Wikipedia and in that way it is not going to be called an advertisement you should delete all of the pages of the present exhibitors such as for an example Banksy and Dismaland exposure which is posted presently on Wikipedia as this exhibition is happening right now. Thank you for you consideration to recover my page. and then click the "Save page" button below -Aleksandar Basic (talk) 19:32, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (CambridgeBayWeather (talk · contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. Note that Wikipedia is not a substitute for a personal website, and that your userpage isn't an article. I also suggest taking a look at WP:Notability and WP:Notability (people), as those explain the bare minimum requirement to have an article on Wikipedia (the second link specifically deals with the notability of people). —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:00, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikipedians have their own user pages, but they should be used primarily to present information relevant to working on the encyclopedia. Limited biographical information is allowed, but user pages should not function as personal webpages or be repositories for large amounts of material that is irrelevant to collaborating on Wikipedia. If you are looking to make a personal webpage or blog or to post your résumé, please make use of one of the many free providers on the Internet or any hosting included with your Internet account."

JohnCD (talk) 19:42, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft talk:M-Cue

Would like to continue working on submission to improve and resubmit -NaomiInasi (talk) 20:18, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:19, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BlackShot

The page "BlackShot" for PC online FPS game of the same title has been deleted in 2011. The game launched in 2008 and is still in service now, with BlackShot Global (for Europe, Brazil, and other parts of the world) and BlackShot SEA (Southeast Asia).

Though it has been through various publishers, the history is a bit of a mess, but during the entire run from 2008 - present it has always been in service and is one of the most popular games in Singapore and Malaysia.

Wikipedia is a place many people look to when searching for definitive information on any subject. Therefore, the absence of a wiki page for BlackShot may deter users from searching further, mistakenly thinking that the game is no longer in service. This could be one of the reasons we are losing potential players, and we hope it can be remedied soon.

Please see the following pages for confirmation that BlackShot is still in service and deserving of a Wiki page of its own:

https://www.blackshot.com/ http://bs.playone.asia/

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aliceatvertigo (talk • contribs) 02:50, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Saudee Group Berhad

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -60.52.112.204 (talk) 04:26, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2= More informative. need not to be deleted.

GetMeWell MEDISOLUTIONS

I, Nadgonde, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nadgonde (talk) 04:40, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done The page was very promotional in tone, so it'd need a complete re-write to meet guidelines. This is a good example of the promotional tone: "he model works on principle of bringing all stakeholders closer to each other on a virtual platform, thus eliminating wasteful expenditure of time, efforts and money." Also, I notice that your userpage gives off the impression that you're editing on behalf of a group and that your username is the name of a group. I'm going to delete the userpage since it is fairly promotional and give you a soft block as a promotional username. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:45, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Photo of Geoffroy de Lagasnerie.jpg

OTRS ticket received. Thanks very much. -Storkk (talk) 10:53, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Storkk:  Done. I have reset the di-no-permission clock, please update with the OTRS permission ticket number a.s.a.p. JohnCD (talk) 15:49, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Turrin

ticket:2015070610000671 takes care of the copyright objection which was the speedy criterion by relicensing the text on the url given in the deletion log. -Storkk (talk) 11:51, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Storkk:  Done but, of course, copying the subject's website is not the way to make an acceptable article. This is promotional in tone and, though I don't doubt the subject's notability, it needs references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to demonstrate it. I have added {{BLP self-published}} and {{peacock}} maintenance templates. Was there a user account associated with the OTRS message, to which advice could be sent? If not, I will assume it is BSHedlund (talk · contribs), who posted the article in 2009 but has not edited since. JohnCD (talk) 15:20, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@JohnCD: (edit conflict) I agree - that's why I couched my undeletion request in those terms. The ticket addresses only the copyright objection, not the WP:COI, WP:NPOV and WP:RS and tone issues. The ticket has an email address that I will send our relevant policies to, but the article should likely go through AFD anyway. Storkk (talk) 15:29, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps, but I think he is notable, and so the AfD verdict would likely be "Keep and improve, AfD is not clean-up". I will post at WP:BLP/N and see if anyone is willing to give it a going-over. JohnCD (talk) 15:36, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ClueJob Escape Rooms in Limassol, Cyprus

It is informative and at the same time it is advertising which i cannot avoid as i have to mention for whom i am talking about. There are other similar articles about the same business that are still there so i believe the one i wrote it is informative and not that advertising...it is not my own place...i promised to the owners i will write something about them, since they told me their story!

This is the page that was deleted: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ClueJob_Escape_Rooms_in_Limassol,_Cyprus

Others similar...and very much advetising and there are many many more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puzzle_Break https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HintHunt

Thank you for understanding,

Filios. -Piatefixer (talk) 14:29, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Piatefixer:  Not done - please read the good advice you were given at Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 379#Article deleted!?. JohnCD (talk) 15:44, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:MariahCarey-MCcover.jpg

Some sockpuppet replaced this JPEG image with the PNG copy, uploaded by the sockpuppet himself. It was used in Mariah Carey (album). -George Ho (talk) 14:50, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kanbanize

The page was previously approved by a Wikipedian who, like us, saw it as a neutral product page. For the same reason that Kleenex, for example, have a Wiki page, we believe that Kanbanize also deserves its place in this community. We are prepared to edit the page to better suit the Wiki standard, but believe that even in the format in which it appeared prior to its deletion is unbiased and simply informative. Thank you in advance. -93.152.164.73 (talk) 15:13, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. This article was deleted because it was the work of a group of users who were taking money to write articles without disclosing the fact. That is contrary to the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use ("Paid contributions without disclosure" under section 4), and in some jurisdictions contravenes laws against covert advertising.
All these articles have been deleted and will not be restored. The only way to put undisclosed commercial spammers out of business is to ensure that their customers get nothing for their money.
If you want to create an article yourself, please read the advice I gave here to someone in the same situation. JohnCD (talk) 15:30, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:DCMTK

Did not find the time to edit it further, will do soon -88.128.80.49 (talk) 20:36, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Geoff Hill

Started a draft on the travel writer Geoff Hill then found the AfC listed while searching for more sources. I think I can source this properly; I have created many motorcyclist/journalist articles before. -Brianhe (talk) 20:38, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Derp. Brianhe (talk) 01:57, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category: Welsh-speaking people

Given the centuries of persecution suffered by Welsh-speakers (just read the history - it makes for shocking reading), the fact that the Welsh language still exists as a living language is nothing short of a miracle. Naturally therefore, it is of much interest to those interested in the Welsh language, those interested in Welsh current affairs, those interested in minority languages as well as to many members of the public in general, for it to be acknowledged that certain notable public figures e.g. politicians, sportspeople or musicians have the ability to speak Welsh. Indeed, failing to do so seems to suggest that the Welsh language is of no significance, to anybody. Whilst some may argue that the language that one speaks is not actually significant, this viewpoint is likely to be prevalent in individuals with a limited understanding of minority languages/cultures. Put another way, whilst the fact that a notable person can speak English may not be necessarily of interest - mainly due to the fact that English is the third most widely-spoken language in the world - by contrast, when a notable person who happens also to speak Welsh is not acknowledged as a Welsh speaker this is missing a very important point, simply because Welsh is much less prevalent than English. Yes, defining a cohort of Welsh-speaking people is of interest to many people, even if that does not happen to include the person(s) who instigated the deletion of this category in the first place. Therefore, just as the section 'Notable people with the name Prabhu', or 'Category:Black British people', for example, may not be of interest to a certain individuals, the fact that these Categories/Sections exist confirm the fact that they are of interest to at least some Wikipedia users, and the same is true for 'Category:Welsh-speaking people'. I hope that the majority of Wikipedia users/editors wish to build a more informative and inclusive encyclopaedia, and not an encyclopaedia that projects an Anglo-American bias whereby smaller cultures and languages are dismissed. I therefore call upon those who instigated this deletion to see beyond their possible prejudices, and remain true to Jimmy Wales' Statement of Principles by re-instating this category without further delay please as many useful links have been lost with the current deletion -Haul~cywiki (talk) 23:57, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Haul~cywiki. If you believe the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2015 August 24#Category:Welsh-speaking people should be overturned, you can make your case at deletion review. As instructed at the top of this page, this project is explicitly not for seeking the overturning of deletion discussions, but only for uncontroversial undeletions.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:32, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blair Daly

Subject is notable as a writer of several hit songs for other artists, thus meeting WP:MUSIC; prodder and deleter likely did not do a WP:BEFORE for sources such as this and this, which are clearly not WP:RUNOFTHEMILL -Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:01, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done @Ten Pound Hammer For prods, all you need do is ask:-)--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 00:35, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Heather Bohlmann

I, 174.115.7.69, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 174.115.7.69 (talk) 03:34, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done This entry was essentially blank, except for an infobox that contained minimal information. It also didn't show up because the template was done incorrectly. I have no objection to you making a new attempt, but there really isn't anything to restore here. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:20, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Smith-Kettlewell Institute

The page was deleted after an expired, uncontested PROD following some Unsourced information being added to the page. I personally added useful and well-sourced information to the page before it was vandalized, and I don't believe that deleting the page serves any purpose, since the Smith-Kettlewell Institute is an existing and ongoing organization with several notable staff and alumni who have links to its page from theirs -Snowen (talk) 06:48, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anthony Del Col

I, Srz92, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Srz92 (talk) 00:47, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Starkillers

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Kiran chandani (talk) 01:09, 11 September 2015 (UTC) Hello, I am requesting a refund for this page's draft so some of the editors on Wikipedia can contribute to this page and then send it to AfC to ensure all wikipedia guidelines are met before it can go on the mainspace. As the initial reason for its deletion based on the deletion discussion was lack of references and poor use of language. I have already spoken with the admin who initially deleted this account and upon their guidance I bought this matter up on DRV. However, after discussion with other members of wikipedia, I was suggested to get a refund for a draft of the Starkillers page. This would give editors opportunity to write the page with the appropriate language and use ample references to prove notability of the musician. Please note, this was also a suggestion from the Wikipedia info team that I had emailed recently and they said if the admin who deleted the page is not going to repost the page, then a new page would need to be created following the guidelines of Wikipedia and contributions from various editors. Please let me know if you would like me to provide you with a copy of the email discussion with Info Wikipedia. Thank you! Kiran chandani (talk) 01:09, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=680467903"