Jump to content

User talk:Ezhiki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Регион102 (talk | contribs) at 21:51, 27 May 2020 (→‎User Валко and his original researches on the Bashkortostan topics: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Yo? Yo!

Archived talk: 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Please comment on Talk:Cary Grant

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cary Grant. Legobot (talk) 04:47, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #293

Administrators' newsletter – January 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2017).

Administrator changes

added Muboshgu
readded AnetodeLaser brainWorm That Turned
removed None

Bureaucrat changes

readded Worm That Turned

Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment is in progress to determine whether the administrator policy should be amended to require disclosure of paid editing activity at WP:RFA and to prohibit the use of administrative tools as part of paid editing activity, with certain exceptions.

Technical news

Arbitration


SpacemanSpiff

Now on SIA Russia https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Vyborgsky_District&diff=817855706&oldid=420181818 78.51.214.48 (talk) 23:46, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #294

Wikidata weekly summary #295

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Capital letters. Legobot (talk) 04:35, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #296

Wikidata weekly summary #297

Administrators' newsletter – February 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2018).

Administrator changes

added None
removed BlurpeaceDana boomerDeltabeignetDenelson83GrandioseSalvidrim!Ymblanter

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC has closed with a consensus that candidates at WP:RFA must disclose whether they have ever edited for pay and that administrators may never use administrative tools as part of any paid editing activity, except when they are acting as a Wikipedian-in-Residence or when the payment is made by the Wikimedia Foundation or an affiliate of the WMF.
  • Editors responding to threats of harm can now contact the Wikimedia Foundation's emergency address by using Special:EmailUser/Emergency. If you don't have email enabled on Wikipedia, directly contacting the emergency address using your own email client remains an option.

Technical news

  • A tag will now be automatically applied to edits that blank a page, turn a page into a redirect, remove/replace almost all content in a page, undo an edit, or rollback an edit. These edits were previously denoted solely by automatic edit summaries.

Arbitration


The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Legobot (talk) 04:34, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #298

Dear Ezhiki, I wonder if you could advise on the possibility of using such Soviet maps in Wikipedia, e.g. could a free license be claimed for the map

http://loadmap.net/en/m11456

so that it could be uploaded in Wikimedia Commons and used for illustration purposes?

Apparently there used to be some relevant debate before, but it's been deleted so I am not aware of the current view on this matter. Best, Apcbg (talk) 09:13, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'd love to help, but I'm not an expert on copyright. If you are going to upload this to the Commons, it would be best to ask there. You will definitely need to know what year these maps were published, though.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); February 12, 2018; 16:51 (UTC)
Thanks, I'll try to seek advice at the Commons; and no, that site gives no year of publication. Best, Apcbg (talk) 12:05, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #299

Speedy deletion nomination of Khlevny

A tag has been placed on Khlevny requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
  • disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Mighty Glen (talk) 12:47, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #300

Please comment on Talk:A Wizard of Earthsea

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:A Wizard of Earthsea. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #301

14 years of editing, today

Hey, Ezhiki. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day!
Chris Troutman (talk) 12:28, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Here's to fourteen more, and then doing it all over again :)—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); March 1, 2018; 14:04 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2018).

Administrator changes

added Lourdes
removed AngelOfSadnessBhadaniChris 73CorenFridayMidomMike V
† Lourdes has requested that her admin rights be temporarily removed, pending her return from travel.

Guideline and policy news

  • The autoconfirmed article creation trial (ACTRIAL) is scheduled to end on 14 March 2018. The results of the research collected can be read on Meta Wiki.
  • Community ban discussions must now stay open for at least 24 hours prior to being closed.
  • A change to the administrator inactivity policy has been proposed. Under the proposal, if an administrator has not used their admin tools for a period of five years and is subsequently desysopped for inactivity, the administrator would have to file a new RfA in order to regain the tools.
  • A change to the banning policy has been proposed which would specify conditions under which a repeat sockmaster may be considered de facto banned, reducing the need to start a community ban discussion for these users.

Technical news

  • CheckUsers are now able to view private data such as IP addresses from the edit filter log, e.g. when the filter prevents a user from creating an account. Previously, this information was unavailable to CheckUsers because access to it could not be logged.
  • The edit filter has a new feature contains_all that edit filter managers may use to check if one or more strings are all contained in another given string.

Miscellaneous

Obituaries

  • Bhadani (Gangadhar Bhadani) passed away on 8 February 2018. Bhadani joined Wikipedia in March 2005 and became an administrator in September 2005. While he was active, Bhadani was regarded as one of the most prolific Wikipedians from India.

Russian populated places set index

Hey Ezhiki!

I was randomming articles in boredom when I stumbled on a set index of Russian populated places called Mochalishche. I added coordinates for the one village that was missing. Thing is, I found another place called Mochalishche in Ukraine, it even has a Wikidata entry. I read some of the policy, but got pretty confused. Since you created the index, I thought I'd ask you: Should the index be replaced with a disambiguation page including the Ukranian location? Should there be a seperate disambiguation page? Should there not be a disambiguation page at all? Hecseur (talk) 16:21, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Hecseur:! Yeah, these can get tricky sometimes. You have to look at each case individually. In general, yes, when a set index on Russian localities conflicts with entities of a different type (but the same name), the best way to handle that is to move the set index to a title conforming to WP:NC:CITY#Russia and create a disambiguation page under the vacated title (from which the set index would be linked, as well as all those other entities). When a conflict is with just one other entity, then it's often sufficient to just leave the set index where it is but add a hatnote on top linking to that entity. If the Ukrainian Mochalischche had an article in the English Wikipedia, this would have been the best course of action in this particular case. However, since it doesn't have one (nor does Mochalishche, Ukraine even meet the disambiguation page red link requirements), there really isn't anything we can do about it until that article is written. Guidelines clearly discourage placement of red links in hatnotes. Hope this helps, but let me know if anything is still unclear. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); March 5, 2018; 16:14 (UTC)
I think the best course of action will be to start creating new articles for these villages. I know the Ukrainian Mochalishche has an article on the Ukrainian Wiki which I can use to build an article on the English Wikipedia. Honestly it's past time these red links will get 'blued'. Thanks for all the help! You really helped a struggling Wikipedian out! Hecseur (talk) 16:58, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Happy to help! And as a matter of fact, encouraging the creation of new articles is one of the reasons we even bother with these set indices in the first place :)—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); March 7, 2018; 19:42 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #302

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Military history. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #303

Hello. Please read carefully WP:EPON for categorization of cities/towns.

91.124.117.29 (talk) 19:58, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, this is one piece of advice you should heed yourself. I've left you a message on your talk page; you might want to stop what you are doing and give it a more thorough thought. Best,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); March 13, 2018; 20:00 (UTC)
Don't add category like "Populated place established in X" for that cities' categories. Because the only main article (name_of_town) related to such category (subcats are unrelated). You were reverted many times not by me, see [1] 91.124.117.29 (talk) 20:10, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • From WP:EPON. There are three options:
  1. Keep both the eponymous category and the main article in the parent category. This is used in Category:Western Europe to allow that region's country articles to be navigated together. This rule is used for all geographic categories (town and cities) now.
  2. Keep just the child article. This is used in Category:British Islands, to prevent a loop. No any loops in discussed categories.
  3. Keep just the eponymous category. This is used for Category:Farmworkers in Category:People by occupation. Such "X by Y" categories sometimes cover a limited navigational set, not a topic (see #Category tree organization), thus there is no logical article content. There are no "X by Y" categories in the involved category tree.

So, the first option is used for cities categories. 91.124.117.29 (talk) 20:19, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

When supercats like "Populated place established in X" are added to a category (eponymous or otherwise), they refer solely to that category, not to every article that category contains (otherwise we would hardly ever be able to add any subcategory to a category—you work up the category tree, not down). It is that idea one must keep in mind when considering how to build a category tree.
The Moscow revert you cited is related to the ongoing re-organization of categories dealing with establishment years and is not in the same league as what you are doing. And most other examples you might be able to find are going to almost always be one-time deals similar to your activities, where the structure is changed with no regard to the big picture.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); March 13, 2018; 20:26 (UTC)
On the "three options", there is no guidance as to which areas of knowledge these options are to be applied; only examples. If you read WP:EPON closely and carefully (an advice I started with), you'll see that's where the "editor consensus" part kicks in. Once the "[t]his rule is used for all geographic categories (town and cities) now" part you added above becomes an actual part of the guideline, then there will be no reason to argue with you; until then you don't really have an argument, only an opinion.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); March 13, 2018; 20:26 (UTC)
For example, the Region (Oblast, Krai) has own category with 15 cities. For example, only four or five of them have an own eponymous categories. If we use Option 3, we have 10 related articles (not all cities!) and 5 subcategories. If we use Option 1, we have 15 cities (all cities!) and 5 subcategories in it. WP:EPON said Keep both the eponymous category and the main article in the parent category... to allow that region's country articles to be navigated together. When the reader navigated the category, what is better? When he had 10 (Option 3) or all 15 (Option 1) cities articles in it? Why you are for Option 3? 91.124.117.29 (talk) 20:42, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I personally don't see one option being better than another. Categories grow, and eventually this example will have fifteen (eponymous) categories and no (individual) articles. Until that happens, we'd have a mix of articles (without eponymous categories) and categories. All fifteen entities are included in both cases, so where's the problem?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); March 19, 2018; 16:14 (UTC)
The problem is to allow that region's country articles to be navigated together. When they are hidden in respective subcategories, they aren't navigated together. In other case, it's a very hard for readers to define the number of correct entities in the category and to receive the full list of entities. When all N=38 cities included (and none missed), then a reader knows, N=38 cities are located in that region. As of now, as I can see, the rule is used in most cases in the geogrpaphic tree, see for example Category:Capitals in Europe, Category:Cities and towns in Norway, Category:Cities in South West England, Category:Central European countries etc. 91.124.117.29 (talk) 15:26, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #304

So the subdistricts are not supposed to be linked from the district that contains them? Dr. Vogel (talk) 14:25, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's not that. If lower divisions are linked properly, that's great. The problem here was that it was easier to kill the whole section wholesale than to fix it. For one, the terminology should match what's used elsewhere—we are not, for example, using "subdistrict" or "rural district" in the context of Russia. It wasn't even matching the infobox information. Then, the links seem to be not to the selsoviets (called "rural settlements" in Rostov Oblast, which this district is a part of), but to individual rural localities, which is not at all the same thing. And even the localities were not being linked the same way they are being linked in other articles. In all, there is a lot of background work that needs to be done before these kind of lists can be added easily; at this point they would just be creating a maintenance backlog and confuse readers.
Let me know if you have questions; I'll be happy to elaborate. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); March 22, 2018; 14:34 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Comedian

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Comedian. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #305

Translation help

Hello. I'm trying to verify whether a whaling station was built on Big Shantar Island in the 19th century. I haven't found anything in English and most of the whaling done there was by Americans. An old steam engine on the island has been variously identified as belonging to either a Russian American Company or just American whaling station. I found two news articles (both in Russian) which appear to say a Soviet-era military settlement existed on the island. I don't entirely trust Google translate (it likes to translate a certain word into "giraffe" for some reason), so I was wondering if you could verify this? They're both short articles. I'd be grateful for any assistance you could provide me. Here are the articles in question: here and here. ST1849 (talk) 20:40, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked at both articles, and unfortunately neither one mentions a whaling station (or anything about the 19th century history). The first article says that the "larger islands" of the archipelago are uninhabited (except for the personnel of the weather station), but there used to be "military townlets" and "Soviet-era settlements" there, which have since been abandoned. The second article specifically states that Bolshoy Shantar used to house a military unit. No word on the island giraffe population, sadly :)
Hope this helps and let me know if you need anything further.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); March 28, 2018; 20:57 (UTC)
Thanks. I should've been more clear. Google translate didn't mention any whaling stations either. It's just that the image in the first article has been floating around on other sites as what is left of an American whaling station. I just wanted to know if the articles indeed mentioned the Soviet-era settlements. Thanks for verifying that. I'm starting to wonder if they just tell tourists it's an abandoned whaling station because that sounds more interesting than a lonely military outpost? So far I've found no documentary evidence to back up that claim. ST1849 (talk) 22:20, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Here's one of the websites that associates that steam engine with an American whaling station and mentions those elusive giraffes. ST1849 (talk) 23:38, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that one describes the whaling aspect in a great deal of detail, but while I have no reasons to doubt the source's veracity, it doesn't look it could qualify as a reliable source (it is an article published on a TV network site, which would normally be OK, but it is in their "blogs" section, which is not). The "giraffe", incidentally, refers to a whale fat-melting device (and I honestly have no clue why google decided to translate this term so). It was identified as previously abandoned by American (as in US American) poachers by the Khabarovsk branch of the All-Russian Preservation Society of Historical and Cultural Monuments, so perhaps that would be a good lead to continue with the research?—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); March 29, 2018; 15:07 (UTC)
Oh, I know. I don't trust any news site/blog written in English, let alone Russian. The problem is you can't use Google translate on books or peer-reviewed papers. I'll see if that preservation society has an English-language email I can contact. Thanks for all the translation help. ST1849 (talk) 18:12, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
If it helps, the Society's website is http://voopik.ru, and the page for the Khabarovsk branch is http://voopik.ru/region/detail.php?ELEMENT_ID=246. Not much information there, but they do have an email listed, if you want to pursue that route. If you manage to stumble upon anything else useful that you need translation help with, feel free to contact me again. Best,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); March 29, 2018; 18:52 (UTC)
Ok. Thanks for the link. ST1849 (talk) 19:01, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – April 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2018).

Administrator changes

added 331dotCordless LarryClueBot NG
removed Gogo DodoPb30SebastiankesselSeicerSoLando

Guideline and policy news

  • Administrators who have been desysopped due to inactivity are now required to have performed at least one (logged) administrative action in the past 5 years in order to qualify for a resysop without going through a new RfA.
  • Editors who have been found to have engaged in sockpuppetry on at least two occasions after an initial indefinite block, for whatever reason, are now automatically considered banned by the community without the need to start a ban discussion.
  • The notability guideline for organizations and companies has been substantially rewritten following the closure of this request for comment. Among the changes, the guideline more clearly defines the sourcing requirements needed for organizations and companies to be considered notable.
  • The six-month autoconfirmed article creation trial (ACTRIAL) ended on 14 March 2018. The post-trial research report has been published. A request for comment is now underway to determine whether the restrictions from ACTRIAL should be implemented permanently.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • The Arbitration Committee is considering a change to the discretionary sanctions procedures which would require an editor to appeal a sanction to the community at WP:AE or WP:AN prior to appealing directly to the Arbitration Committee at WP:ARCA.

Miscellaneous

  • A discussion has closed which concluded that administrators are not required to enable email, though many editors suggested doing so as a matter of best practice.
  • The Foundations' Anti-Harassment Tools team has released the Interaction Timeline. This shows a chronologic history for two users on pages where they have both made edits, which may be helpful in identifying sockpuppetry and investigating editing disputes.

Wikidata weekly summary #306

Gritsovsky

Hi. I just added the article on Gritsovsky, and noticed that your sandbox had a link to it. Are you, or do you know someone who is, good with infoboxes? --Bejnar (talk) 23:09, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take care of it in the next couple of days. Thanks for letting me know (and for creating the stub). Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); April 4, 2018; 02:30 (UTC)
You indicated that "urban-type settlements should not be included with cities and towns". Yet the article on Urban-type settlement indicates that This type of locality has been used in all 15 member republics of the former Soviet Union since 1922 when it replaced a number of terms which could have been translated by the English term "town" .... Gritsovsky is a little bigger in size than the US town that I grew up in was. Having a hospital is more than many small towns in the US have, much less a refrigerator factory. So, could you tell me why an "urban-type settlement" should not be considered a town? The satellite view certainly looks like a town. Or is the English word "town" just entirely inappropriate when talking about Russian settlements smaller than a city? If not a town, could/should there be a subsection or subsections of the {{Tula Oblast}} template for other settlements, comparable to the {{Socorro County, New Mexico}} template? Should the top settlement section have only cities? Where would be an appropriate place to discuss this? --Bejnar (talk) 23:52, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Well, just because the term can be translated as "town" doesn't mean the place is a town... "Urban-type settlement" is a very specific connotation (and by definition, an urban-type settlement is not a town, but an urban entity roughly between a town proper and a rural locality), but since the concept itself is very much Russia- and former Soviet Union-specific and has no apparent equivalents in Western countries, "town" is an acceptable translation when a place needs to be identified as something, but where an exact designation does not really matter (such as in a news coverage for an area where an urban-type settlement is located). In Wikipedia articles dealing with Russian geography, however, the designation does in fact matter.
You are completely right about the Tula Oblast template needing another section, though. I was going through those templates before, but never made it to Tula Oblast (see, for example, {{Republic of Bashkortostan}} or {{Sakha Republic}}). I'd be happy to add a section to Tula Oblast's template if you wish; just let me know. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); April 12, 2018; 14:46 (UTC)
Yes, please. --Bejnar (talk) 16:36, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've added them. I also just remembered that a bunch of urban-type settlements in Tula Oblast (Gritsovsky included) were demoted to a rural status a few years ago. The list now in {{Tula Oblast}} is current.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); April 24, 2018; 14:15 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Russian city/doc

Template:Infobox Russian city/doc has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:26, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Germanic peoples

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Germanic peoples. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #307

Wikidata weekly summary #308

Wikidata weekly summary #309

Please comment on Talk:Mark Weisbrot

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Mark Weisbrot. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, from the Portals WikiProject...

You are invited to join the effort to revitalize and improve the Portal system...

The Portals WikiProject was rebooted 9 days ago, and is going strong. Fifty-two editors have joined so far, with more joining daily.

We're having a blast, and excitement is high...

Our goal is to update, upgrade, and maintain portals.

In addition to working directly on portals, we are developing tools to make building and maintaining portals easier. We've finished one so far, with more to come.

Discussions are underway about how to upgrade portals, and what the portals of the future will be.

There are plenty of tasks (including WikiGnome tasks too) on the WikiProject page.

With more to come.

We may even surprise ourselves and exceed all expectations. Who knows what we will be able to accomplish in what may become the biggest Wikicollaboration in years.

See ya at the WikiProject!

Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   03:22, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I won't be joining, but best of luck to y'all with this endeavor.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); April 27, 2018; 13:19 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #310

Administrators' newsletter – May 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2018).

Administrator changes

added None
removed ChochopkCoffeeGryffindorJimpKnowledge SeekerLankiveilPeridonRjd0060

Guideline and policy news

  • The ability to create articles directly in mainspace is now indefinitely restricted to autoconfirmed users.
  • A proposal is being discussed which would create a new "event coordinator" right that would allow users to temporarily add the "confirmed" flag to new user accounts and to create many new user accounts without being hindered by a rate limit.

Technical news

  • AbuseFilter has received numerous improvements, including an OOUI overhaul, syntax highlighting, ability to search existing filters, and a few new functions. In particular, the search feature can be used to ensure there aren't existing filters for what you need, and the new equals_to_any function can be used when checking multiple namespaces. One major upcoming change is the ability to see which filters are the slowest. This information is currently only available to those with access to Logstash.
  • When blocking anonymous users, a cookie will be applied that reloads the block if the user changes their IP. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. This currently only occurs when hard-blocking accounts.
  • The block notice shown on mobile will soon be more informative and point users to a help page on how to request an unblock, just as it currently does on desktop.
  • There will soon be a calendar widget at Special:Block, making it easier to set expiries for a specific date and time.

Arbitration

Obituaries

  • Lankiveil (Craig Franklin) passed away in mid-April. Lankiveil joined Wikipedia on 12 August 2004 and became an administrator on 31 August 2008. During his time with the Wikimedia community, Lankiveil served as an oversighter for the English Wikipedia and as president of Wikimedia Australia.

Wikidata weekly summary #311

I created this stub and will work on it in the coming days. For the Nenets AO, I do not have a slightest idea what its divisions are (and Administrative divisions of Nenets Autonomous Okrug does not help much), but if you have expert knowledge (I am sure you have) and time (I am less sure) may be you could add an infobox with proper references and write a section on administratiove status? Thanks a lot.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:02, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's been hard finding time to do anything meaningful around Wikipedia for me lately (and I'm not sure when this situation will improve), but I will certainly add your request at the top of my to-do list. However, please feel free to take a stab at this task yourself if it takes me longer than a reasonable amount of time to get to it.
As for NAO's administrative structure, it is pretty straightforward. Naryan-Mar is incorporated as a town of okrug significance, and the rest of NAO's territory comprises Zapolyarny District. (On the municipal divisions side, those correspond to Naryan-Mar Urban Okrug and Zapolyarny Municipal District). The (administrative) district is further divided into eighteen selsoviets and one urban-type settlement of district significance (that would be Iskateley), which municipally correspond 1:1 to rural settlements and an urban settlement. The administrative divisions are enumerated in this law, which you can probably find online (or feel free to shoot me an email and I'll be happy to send you a Word copy of the latest revision). Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); May 8, 2018; 15:57 (UTC)
Great, thank you very much. I will do whatever I can do, and checking hopefully takes less time than creation from zero.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:33, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I believe I have fixed the references.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:31, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
An unrelated question: in some subject templates we have first cities/towns, then urban-type settlements, and then districts (sometimes we have federal-level settlements but I am not now talking about them); in other templates we have first cities/towns, then districts, and then urban-type settlements. We probably should come with a unified design; I believe it is more logical to have urban-type settlements between towns and districts. What do you think about it?--Ymblanter (talk) 07:34, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
We used to have separate templates for districts and for cities/towns, and I think when I was merging them, I was mostly using city/town templates as a starting point, but since I wasn't merging them all in one sitting, in some of them cities/towns ended up at the top, and in others in the middle. You are right, of course, that a consistent approach would be an improvement. I would think a top-down approach—listing districts, then cities/towns, then urban-type settlements—makes most sense (with the ZATOs being listed either last, or between the districts and cities/towns), but I guess as long as everything is consistent across the board, it doesn't matter all that much. If you want to change these templates to use a certain order, I sure am not going to complain. Thanks!—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); May 16, 2018; 16:13 (UTC)
Good, thanks. Let is make it districts -> ZATO -> towns -> urban-type settlements then. I will change them (I am adding the urban-type settlements where they are missing anyway).--Ymblanter (talk) 06:01, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Music. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #312

Hi Ezhiki!! Kges1901 has tried to assist your great efforts by creating this article. I'm sure he was specifically thinking of your Far Eastern heritage ;) Please amend/change as required.. Buckshot06 (talk) 08:47, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #313

Please comment on Talk:Forever alone

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Forever alone. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #314

Administrators' newsletter – June 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2018).

Administrator changes

added None
removed Al Ameer sonAliveFreeHappyCenariumLupoMichaelBillington

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • IP-based cookie blocks should be deployed to English Wikipedia in June. This will cause the block of a logged-out user to be reloaded if they change IPs. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. For the time being, it only affects users of the desktop interface.
  • The Wikimedia Foundation's Anti-Harassment Tools team will build granular types of blocks in 2018 (e.g. a block from uploading or editing specific pages, categories, or namespaces, as opposed to a full-site block). Feedback on the concept may be left at the talk page.
  • There is now a checkbox on Special:ListUsers to let you see only users in temporary user groups.
  • It is now easier for blocked mobile users to see why they were blocked.

Arbitration

  • A recent technical issue with the Arbitration Committee's spam filter inadvertently caused all messages sent to the committee through Wikipedia (i.e. Special:EmailUser/Arbitration Committee) to be discarded. If you attempted to send an email to the Arbitration Committee via Wikipedia between May 16 and May 31, your message was not received and you are encouraged to resend it. Messages sent outside of these dates or directly to the Arbitration Committee email address were not affected by this issue.

Miscellaneous


Wikidata weekly summary #315

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Succession to the British throne. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #316

Wikidata weekly summary #317

Wikidata weekly summary #318

Wikidata weekly summary #319

Administrators' newsletter – July 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2018).

Administrator changes

added PbsouthwoodTheSandDoctor
readded Gogo Dodo
removed AndrevanDougEVulaKaisaLTony FoxWilyD

Bureaucrat changes

removed AndrevanEVula

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC about the deletion of drafts closed with a consensus to change the wording of WP:NMFD. Specifically, a draft that has been repeatedly resubmitted and declined at AfC without any substantial improvement may be deleted at MfD if consensus determines that it is unlikely to ever meet the requirements for mainspace and it otherwise meets one of the reasons for deletion outlined in the deletion policy.
  • A request for comment closed with a consensus that the {{promising draft}} template cannot be used to indefinitely prevent a WP:G13 speedy deletion nomination.

Technical news

  • Starting on July 9, the WMF Security team, Trust & Safety, and the broader technical community will be seeking input on an upcoming change that will restrict editing of site-wide JavaScript and CSS to a new technical administrators user group. Bureaucrats and stewards will be able to grant this right per a community-defined process. The intention is to reduce the number of accounts who can edit frontend code to those who actually need to, which in turn lessens the risk of malicious code being added that compromises the security and privacy of everyone who accesses Wikipedia. For more information, please review the FAQ.
  • Syntax highlighting has been graduated from a Beta feature on the English Wikipedia. To enable this feature, click the highlighter icon () in your editing toolbar (or under the hamburger menu in the 2017 wikitext editor). This feature can help prevent you from making mistakes when editing complex templates.
  • IP-based cookie blocks should be deployed to English Wikipedia in July (previously scheduled for June). This will cause the block of a logged-out user to be reloaded if they change IPs. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. For the time being, it only affects users of the desktop interface.

Miscellaneous

  • Currently around 20% of admins have enabled two-factor authentication, up from 17% a year ago. If you haven't already enabled it, please consider doing so. Regardless if you use 2FA, please practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.

Wikidata weekly summary #320

Wikidata weekly summary #321

Wikidata weekly summary #322

July 2018

Information icon Hello. It appears your talk page is becoming quite lengthy and is in need of archiving. According to Wikipedia's user talk page guidelines; "Large talk pages become difficult to read, strain the limits of older browsers, and load slowly over slow internet connections. As a rule of thumb, archive closed discussions when a talk page exceeds 75 KB or has multiple resolved or stale discussions." - this talk page is 1425.7 KB. See Help:Archiving a talk page for instructions on how to manually archive your talk page, or to arrange for automatic archiving using a bot. If you have any questions, place a {{help me}} notice on your talk page, or go to the help desk. Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:12, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #323

Interested in translating some articles for WP:WIR's event this month?

Hello! Would you be interested in translating some articles from Russian to English for WP:WIR's event this month? I have a list of links of indigenous women missing from the en-wiki that I've been collected forever and it'd be nice to get some more of them translated. And if you know anyone else that would be interested, please feel free to let them know! -Yupik (talk) 03:51, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – August 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2018).

Administrator changes

added Sro23
readded KaisaLYmblanter

Guideline and policy news

  • After a discussion at Meta, a new user group called "interface administrators" (formerly "technical administrator") has been created. Come the end of August, interface admins will be the only users able to edit site-wide JavaScript and CSS pages like MediaWiki:Common.js and MediaWiki:Common.css, or edit other user's personal JavaScript and CSS. The intention is to improve security and privacy by reducing the number of accounts which could be used to compromise the site or another user's account through malicious code. The new user group can be assigned and revoked by bureaucrats. Discussion is ongoing to establish details for implementing the group on the English Wikipedia.
  • Following a request for comment, the WP:SISTER style guideline now states that in the mainspace, interwiki links to Wikinews should only be made as per the external links guideline. This generally means that within the body of an article, you should not link to Wikinews about a particular event that is only a part of the larger topic. Wikinews links in "external links" sections can be used where helpful, but not automatically if an equivalent article from a reliable news outlet could be linked in the same manner.

Technical news


Wikidata weekly summary #324

Wikidata weekly summary #325

Wikidata weekly summary #326

Wikidata weekly summary #327

Administrators' newsletter – September 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2018).

Administrator changes

added None
removed AsterionCrisco 1492KFKudpungLizRandykittySpartaz
renamed Optimist on the runVoice of Clam

Interface administrator changes

added AmorymeltzerMr. StradivariusMusikAnimalMSGJTheDJXaosflux

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a "stop-gap" discussion, six users have temporarily been made interface administrators while discussion is ongoing for a more permanent process for assigning the permission. Interface administrators are now the only editors allowed to edit sitewide CSS and JavaScript pages, as well as CSS/JS pages in another user's userspace. Previously, all administrators had this ability. The right can be granted and revoked by bureaucrats.

Technical news

  • Because of a data centre test you will be able to read but not edit the wikis for up to an hour on 12 September and 10 October. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time. The time when you can't edit might be shorter than an hour.
  • Some abuse filter variables have changed. They are now easier to understand for non-experts. The old variables will still work but filter editors are encouraged to replace them with the new ones. You can find the list of changed variables on mediawiki.org. They have a note which says Deprecated. Use ... instead. An example is article_text which is now page_title.
  • Abuse filters can now use how old a page is. The variable is page_age.

Arbitration

  • The Arbitration Committee has resolved to perform a round of Checkuser and Oversight appointments. The usernames of all applicants will be shared with the Functionaries team, and they will be requested to assist in the vetting process. The deadline to submit an application is 23:59 UTC, 12 September, and the candidates that move forward will be published on-wiki for community comments on 18 September.

Wikidata weekly summary #328

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
thanks for your contribution on improving Russian-relate Wikipedia articles La.ph (talk) 19:17, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #329

Wikidata weekly summary #330

Wikidata weekly summary #331

Wikidata weekly summary #332

Administrators' newsletter – October 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2018).

Administrator changes

added JustlettersandnumbersL235
removed BgwhiteHorsePunchKidJ GrebKillerChihuahuaRami RWinhunter

Interface administrator changes

added Cyberpower678Deryck ChanOshwahPharosRagesossRitchie333

Oversight changes

removed Guerillero NativeForeigner SnowolfXeno

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Partial blocks should be available for testing in October on the Test Wikipedia and the Beta-Cluster. This new feature allows admins to block users from editing specific pages and in the near-future, namespaces and uploading files. You can expect more updates and an invitation to help with testing once it is available.
  • The Foundations' Anti-Harassment Tools team is currently looking for input on how to measure the effectiveness of blocks. This is in particular related to how they will measure the success of the aforementioned partial blocks.
  • Because of a data centre test, you will be able to read but not edit the Wikimedia projects for up to an hour on 10 October. This will start at 14:00 (UTC). You might lose edits if you try to save during this time.

Arbitration

  • The Arbitration Committee has, by motion, amended the procedure on functionary inactivity.
  • The community consultation for 2018 CheckUser and Oversight appointments has concluded. Appointments will be made by October 11.
  • Following a request for comment, the size of the Arbitration Committee will be decreased to 13 arbitrators, starting in 2019. Additionally, the minimum support percentage required to be appointed to a two-year term on ArbCom has been increased to 60%. ArbCom candidates who receive between 50% and 60% support will be appointed to one-year terms instead.
  • Nominations for the 2018 Arbitration Committee Electoral Commission are being accepted until 12 October. These are the editors who help run the ArbCom election smoothly. If you are interested in volunteering for this role, please consider nominating yourself.

Wikidata weekly summary #333

Wikidata weekly summary #334

Wikidata weekly summary #335

Gone?

Are you still with us on enwiki? Haven't seen you edit for a while. I'm finding it difficult to dedicate as much time as I used to, but I hope you haven't gone for good. Fenix down (talk) 16:05, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #336

Administrators' newsletter – November 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2018).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Partial blocks is now available for testing on the Test Wikipedia. The new functionality allows you to block users from editing specific pages. Bugs may exist and can be reported on the local talk page or on Meta. A discussion regarding deployment to English Wikipedia will be started by community liaisons sometime in the near future.
  • A user script is now available to quickly review unblock requests.
  • The 2019 Community Wishlist Survey is now accepting new proposals until November 11, 2018. The results of this survey will determine what software the Wikimedia Foundation's Community Tech team will work on next year. Voting on the proposals will take place from November 16 to November 30, 2018. Specifically, there is a proposal category for admins and stewards that may be of interest.

Arbitration

  • Eligible editors will be invited to nominate themselves as candidates in the 2018 Arbitration Committee Elections starting on November 4 until November 13. Voting will begin on November 19 and last until December 2.
  • The Arbitration Committee's email address has changed to arbcom-en@wikimedia.org. Other email lists, such as functionaries-en and clerks-l, remain unchanged.

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Russian inhabited locality

Template:Infobox Russian inhabited locality has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 19:22, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #337

Wikidata weekly summary #338

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ezhiki. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #339

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Russian city district

Template:Infobox Russian city district has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 15:49, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Russian district

Template:Infobox Russian district has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 15:57, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #340

Administrators' newsletter – December 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2018).

Administrator changes

readded Al Ameer sonRandykittySpartaz
removed BosonDaniel J. LeivickEfeEsanchez7587Fred BauderGarzoMartijn HoekstraOrangemike

Interface administrator changes

removedDeryck Chan

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, the Mediation Committee is now closed and will no longer be accepting case requests.
  • A request for comment is in progress to determine whether members of the Bot Approvals Group should satisfy activity requirements in order to remain in that role.
  • A request for comment is in progress regarding whether to change the administrator inactivity policy, such that administrators "who have made no logged administrative actions for at least 12 months may be desysopped". Currently, the policy states that administrators "who have made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least 12 months may be desysopped".
  • A proposal has been made to temporarily restrict editing of the Main Page to interface administrators in order to mitigate the impact of compromised accounts.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • In late November, an attacker compromised multiple accounts, including at least four administrator accounts, and used them to vandalize Wikipedia. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately. Sharing the same password across multiple websites makes your account vulnerable, especially if your password was used on a website that suffered a data breach. As these incidents have shown, these concerns are not pure fantasies.
  • Wikipedia policy requires administrators to have strong passwords. To further reinforce security, administrators should also consider enabling two-factor authentication. A committed identity can be used to verify that you are the true account owner in the event that your account is compromised and/or you are unable to log in.

Obituaries


Wikidata weekly summary #341

Wikidata weekly summary #342

Wikidata weekly summary #343

Wikidata weekly summary #344

Administrators' newsletter – January 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2018).

Guideline and policy news

  1. G14 (new): Disambiguation pages that disambiguate only zero or one existing pages are now covered under the new G14 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-disambig}}; the text is unchanged and candidates may be found in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as unnecessary disambiguation pages.
  2. R4 (new): Redirects in the file namespace (and no file links) that have the same name as a file or redirect at Commons are now covered under the new R4 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-redircom}}; the text is unchanged.
  3. G13 (expanded): Userspace drafts containing only the default Article Wizard text are now covered under G13 along with other drafts (discussion). Such blank drafts are now eligible after six months rather than one year, and taggers continue to use {{db-blankdraft}}.

Technical news

  • Starting on December 13, the Wikimedia Foundation security team implemented new password policy and requirements. Privileged accounts (administrators, bureaucrats, checkusers, oversighters, interface administrators, bots, edit filter managers/helpers, template editors, et al.) must have a password at least 10 characters in length. All accounts must have a password:
  1. At least 8 characters in length
  2. Not in the 100,000 most popular passwords (defined by the Password Blacklist library)
  3. Different from their username
User accounts not meeting these requirements will be prompted to update their password accordingly. More information is available on MediaWiki.org.
  • Blocked administrators may now block the administrator that blocked them. This was done to mitigate the possibility that a compromised administrator account would block all other active administrators, complementing the removal of the ability to unblock oneself outside of self-imposed blocks. A request for comment is currently in progress to determine whether the blocking policy should be updated regarding this change.
  • {{Copyvio-revdel}} now has a link to open the history with the RevDel checkboxes already filled in.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Accounts continue to be compromised on a regular basis. Evidence shows this is entirely due to the accounts having the same password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately.
  • Around 22% of admins have enabled two-factor authentication, up from 20% in June 2018. If you haven't already enabled it, please consider doing so. Regardless of whether you use 2FA, please practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.

Wikidata weekly summary #345

Wikidata weekly summary #346

Wikidata weekly summary #347

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Russian federal subject

Template:Infobox Russian federal subject has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 18:20, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #348

Wikidata weekly summary #349

Administrators' newsletter – February 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2019).

Administrator changes

added EnterpriseyJJMC89
readded BorgQueen
removed Harro5Jenks24GraftR. Baley

Interface administrator changes

removedEnterprisey

Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment is currently open to reevaluate the activity requirements for administrators.
  • Administrators who are blocked have the technical ability to block the administrator who blocked their own account. A recent request for comment has amended the blocking policy to clarify that this ability should only be used in exceptional circumstances, such as account compromises, where there is a clear and immediate need.
  • A request for comment closed with a consensus in favor of deprecating The Sun as a permissible reference, and creating an edit filter to warn users who attempt to cite it.

Technical news

  • A discussion regarding an overhaul of the format and appearance of Wikipedia:Requests for page protection is in progress (permalink). The proposed changes will make it easier to create requests for those who are not using Twinkle. The workflow for administrators at this venue will largely be unchanged. Additionally, there are plans to archive requests similar to how it is done at WP:PERM, where historical records are kept so that prior requests can more easily be searched for.

Miscellaneous

  • Voting in the 2019 Steward elections will begin on 08 February 2019, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 28 February 2019, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
  • A new IRC bot is available that allows you to subscribe to notifications when specific filters are tripped. This requires that your IRC handle be identified.

Wikidata weekly summary #350

Pashino, Novosibirsk Oblast also Гвардейский (Новосибирск-95)

Any chance of getting this created? Context: http://www.ww2.dk/new/rvsn/39gvmd.htm; https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/39-%D1%8F_%D0%B3%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%B9%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%BA%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%8F_%D0%B4%D0%B8%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%B8%D1%8F. Thankyou!! Buckshot06 (talk) 08:15, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ezhiki has been unfortunately long time inactive, but I will have a look.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:18, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #351

Nomination for deletion of Template:RussiaTimeZone

Template:RussiaTimeZone has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 22:04, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #352

Wikidata weekly summary #353

Happy First Edit Day!


Wikidata weekly summary #354

Administrators' newsletter – March 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2019).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • A new tool is available to help determine if a given IP is an open proxy/VPN/webhost/compromised host.

Arbitration

  • The Arbitration Committee announced two new OTRS queues. Both are meant solely for cases involving private information; other cases will continue to be handled at the appropriate venues (e.g., WP:COIN or WP:SPI).
    • paid-en-wp@wikipedia.org has been set up to receive private evidence related to abusive paid editing.
    • checkuser-en-wp@wikipedia.org has been set up to receive private requests for CheckUser. For instance, requests for IP block exemption for anonymous proxy editing should now be sent to this address instead of the functionaries-en list.

Miscellaneous


Wikidata weekly summary #355

Wikidata weekly summary #356

Wikidata weekly summary #357

A tag has been placed on Obradovo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
  • disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ___CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 13:20, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #358

Administrators' newsletter – April 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2019).

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Two more administrator accounts were compromised. Evidence has shown that these attacks, like previous incidents, were due to reusing a password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately. All admins are strongly encouraged to enable two-factor authentication, please consider doing so. Please always practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
  • As a reminder, according to WP:NOQUORUM, administrators looking to close or relist an AfD should evaluate a nomination that has received few or no comments as if it were a proposed deletion (PROD) prior to determining whether it should be relisted.

Wikidata weekly summary #359

Nomination for deletion of Template:Dec to frac

Template:Dec to frac has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:25, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #360

A cup of tea for you!

Where you at Druzhba? I hope you're not gone like our old friend Greyhood. Take care old friend! Geoffroi (talk) 06:59, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #361

Wikidata weekly summary #362

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Information icon

Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:03, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Awright, awright, I'm still alive.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); May 1, 2019; 14:36 (UTC)

Are you back?

Hope everything is alright. Fenix down (talk) 15:28, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Great, I was afraid smth happened. Once you have time pls ping me, I will update you on recent developments on Russian localities.--Ymblanter (talk) 15:48, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Good to see you folks are still around! I did miss you all. In the hindsight, I should have probably posted a note that everything was OK. It's just that it has been an incredibly busy year, with all kinds of crazy changes, but frankly I also felt I needed a break. Thirteen years of non-stop editing does take its toll after all, it seems :)
I'll be taking it easy for a while still, but am planning to at least show up more often. If you don't mind briefing me on what has happened, I'd sure appreciate it. My projects, I'm afraid, have fallen quite behind, so it'll probably have to be an entire new tack. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); May 1, 2019; 16:57 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Pacific War

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Pacific War. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious
Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:38, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

... three years now --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:30, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Russian locality update

Hi Ezhiki,

great that you are back to regular activity. Let me update you on what happened in the last year when you were away. The activities below do not include Crimea and Sevastopol, which require special treatment anyway.

  • All articles on urban-type settlements have been created (though most of newly created are stubs which only contain the population information such as Aksyonovo-Zilovskoye. If you come across a redlink referring to an urban-type settlement, it is an oversight.
  • I started creating stubs on rural localities which are district centers; these can be monitored for example here; I have about 150 more to go and should be able to finish them reasonably soon. Those which I created are stubs as well.
  • Several users were created articles on Russian rural localities, presumably using the census results per federal subject. All of these are stubs, but at least they contain references to population and administrative divisions. Sometimes these are wrong and need to be checked. I believe there are some federal subjects which have been fully or almost fully covered (Adygea, Altai Republic, Altai Krai, Amur Oblast, Arkhangelsk Oblast, possibly smth else). They should be findable through categories.
  • For about half of the federal subjects, lists of rural localities were created, such as List of rural localities in Zabaykalsky Krai. Some of them are structured by districts. As far as I understand, they were just filled by the content of the categories. I do not think anybody updates them on a regular basis.
  • I added urban-type settlements and lists of rural localities to the templates "Administrative divisions of xxx" and made sure these templates have been added to all relevant articles. The templates must be up to day, i.e. the should not include rural localities which have been downgraded from urban-type settlements.
  • We have lost all of our templates to the unification proponents. As a result, most of our articles show wrong maps (see e.g. Pavinsky District. None of the unification enthusiasts showed any interest in fixing them. Since they were at TfD, I can not just restore old templates. I am not sure what we can do at this point.
  • We got a pretty strong suggestion that the population must be converted from the templates to prose, according to MOS. We will have to do this at some point.
  • As soon as I am done creating all rural district centers, I am going to be back with filling in articles with information as I was doing before. I stopped somewhere in the middle of Smolensk Oblast.--Ymblanter (talk) 17:35, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 special circular

Icon of a white exclamation mark within a black triangle
Administrators must secure their accounts

The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.

View additional information

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:19, 4 May 2019 (UTC) Template:Z152[reply]

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC) Template:Z83[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – May 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2019).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • XTools Admin Stats, a tool to list admins by administrative actions, has been revamped to support more types of log entries such as AbuseFilter changes. Two additional tools have been integrated into it as well: Steward Stats and Patroller Stats.

Arbitration

  • In response to the continuing compromise of administrator accounts, the Arbitration Committee passed a motion amending the procedures for return of permissions (diff). In such cases, the committee will review all available information to determine whether the administrator followed "appropriate personal security practices" before restoring permissions; administrators found failing to have adequately done so will not be resysopped automatically. All current administrators have been notified of this change.
  • Following a formal ratification process, the arbitration policy has been amended (diff). Specifically, the two-thirds majority required to remove or suspend an arbitrator now excludes (1) the arbitrator facing suspension or removal, and (2) any inactive arbitrator who does not respond within 30 days to attempts to solicit their feedback on the resolution through all known methods of communication.

Miscellaneous


Wikidata weekly summary #363

Wikidata weekly summary #364

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #365

Wikidata weekly summary #366

Please comment on Help talk:Citation Style 1

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Help talk:Citation Style 1. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #367

Administrators' newsletter – June 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2019).

Administrator changes

removed AndonicConsumed CrustaceanEnigmamanEuryalusEWS23HereToHelpNv8200paPeripitusStringTheory11Vejvančický

CheckUser changes

removed Ivanvector

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC seeks to clarify whether WP:OUTING should include information on just the English Wikipedia or any Wikimedia project.
  • An RfC on WT:RfA concluded that Requests for adminship and bureaucratship are discussions seeking to build consensus.
  • An RfC proposal to make the templates for discussion (TfD) process more like the requested moves (RM) process, i.e. "as a clearinghouse of template discussions", was closed as successful.

Technical news

  • The CSD feature of Twinkle now allows admins to notify page creators of deletion if the page had not been tagged. The default behavior matches that of tagging notifications, and replaces the ability to open the user talk page upon deletion. You can customize which criteria receive notifications in your Twinkle preferences: look for Notify page creator when deleting under these criteria.
  • Twinkle's d-batch (batch delete) feature now supports deleting subpages (and related redirects and talk pages) of each page. The pages will be listed first but use with caution! The und-batch (batch undelete) option can now also restore talk pages.

Miscellaneous


A discussion has started about wrapper templates of {{Link language}}. You may be interested in participating because you participated in a related previous discussion. E^pi*i batch (talk) 03:04, 10 June 2019 (UTC) (Retro is my main account.)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #368

Wikidata weekly summary #369

Wikidata weekly summary #370

Wikidata weekly summary #371

Administrators' newsletter – July 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2019).

Administrator changes

removed 28bytesAd OrientemAnsh666BeeblebroxBoing! said ZebedeeBU Rob13Dennis BrownDeorDoRDFloquenbeam1Flyguy649Fram2GadfiumGB fanJonathunderKusmaLectonarMoinkMSGJNickOd MishehuRamaSpartazSyrthissTheDJWJBscribe
1Floquenbeam's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.
2Fram's access was removed, then restored, then removed again.

Guideline and policy news

  • In a related matter, the account throttle has been restored to six creations per day as the mitigation activity completed.

Technical news

  • The Wikimedia Foundation's Community health initiative plans to design and build a new user reporting system to make it easier for people experiencing harassment and other forms of abuse to provide accurate information to the appropriate channel for action to be taken. Community feedback is invited.

Miscellaneous


Wikidata weekly summary #372

Wikidata weekly summary #373

Wikidata weekly summary #374

Wikidata weekly summary #375

Administrators' newsletter – August 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2019).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Following a research project on masking IP addresses, the Foundation is starting a new project to improve the privacy of IP editors. The result of this project may significantly change administrative and counter-vandalism workflows. The project is in the very early stages of discussions and there is no concrete plan yet. Admins and the broader community are encouraged to leave feedback on the talk page.
  • The new page reviewer right is bundled with the admin tool set. Many admins regularly help out at Special:NewPagesFeed, but they may not be aware of improvements, changes, and new tools for the Curation system. Stay up to date by subscribing here to the NPP newsletter that appears every two months, and/or putting the reviewers' talk page on your watchlist.

    Since the introduction of temporary user rights, it is becoming more usual to accord the New Page Reviewer right on a probationary period of 3 to 6 months in the first instance. This avoids rights removal for inactivity at a later stage and enables a review of their work before according the right on a permanent basis.


Wikidata weekly summary #376

Wikidata weekly summary #377

Wikidata weekly summary #378

Wikidata weekly summary #379

Wikidata weekly summary #380

Administrators' newsletter – September 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2019).

Administrator changes

added BradvChetsfordIzno
readded FloquenbeamLectonar
removed DESiegelJake WartenbergRjanagTopbanana

CheckUser changes

removed CallaneccLFaraoneThere'sNoTime

Oversight changes

removed CallaneccFoxHJ MitchellLFaraoneThere'sNoTime

Technical news

  • Editors using the mobile website on Wikipedia can opt-in to new advanced features via your settings page. This will give access to more interface links, special pages, and tools.
  • The advanced version of the edit review pages (recent changes, watchlist, and related changes) now includes two new filters. These filters are for "All contents" and "All discussions". They will filter the view to just those namespaces.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Wikidata weekly summary #381

Wikidata weekly summary #382

Wikidata weekly summary #383

Wikidata weekly summary #384

"Бурый" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Бурый. Since you had some involvement with the Бурый redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Crouch, Swale (talk) 11:33, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – October 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2019).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a discussion, a new criterion for speedy category renaming was added: C2F: One eponymous article, which applies if the category contains only an eponymous article or media file, provided that the category has not otherwise been emptied shortly before the nomination. The default outcome is an upmerge to the parent categories.

Technical news

  • As previously noted, tighter password requirements for Administrators were put in place last year. Wikipedia should now alert you if your password is less than 10 characters long and thus too short.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • The Community Tech team has been working on a system for temporarily watching pages, and welcomes feedback.

Wikidata weekly summary #385

Wikidata weekly summary #386

Wikidata weekly summary #387

Wikidata weekly summary #388 & Wikidata Birthday

Administrators' newsletter – November 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2019).

Guideline and policy news

  • A related RfC is seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure.

Arbitration


Wikidata weekly summary #389

A tag has been placed on Category:Urban-type settlements in Chechnya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:41, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #390

Wikidata weekly summary #391

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #392

Administrators' newsletter – December 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2019).

Administrator changes

added EvergreenFirToBeFree
removed AkhilleusAthaenaraJohn VandenbergMelchoirMichaelQSchmidtNeilNYoungamerican😂

CheckUser changes

readded Beeblebrox
removed Deskana

Interface administrator changes

readded Evad37

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Wikidata weekly summary #393

Wikidata weekly summary #394

Weekly Summary #395

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Andrey Kiselyov (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
  • disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
  • is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:42, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #396

Administrators' newsletter – January 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2019).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Wikidata weekly summary #397

Wikidata weekly summary #398

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Asekeyevo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
  • disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
  • is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Grognard Extraordinaire Chess (talk) Ping when replying 08:46, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #399

Wikidata weekly summary #400

Administrators' newsletter – February 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2020).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, partial blocks are now enabled on the English Wikipedia. This functionality allows administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces rather than the entire site. A draft policy is being workshopped at Wikipedia:Partial blocks.
  • The request for comment seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure closed with wide-spread support for an alternative desysoping procedure based on community input. No proposed process received consensus.

Technical news

  • Twinkle now supports partial blocking. There is a small checkbox that toggles the "partial" status for both blocks and templating. There is currently one template: {{uw-pblock}}.
  • When trying to move a page, if the target title already exists then a warning message is shown. The warning message will now include a link to the target title. [4]

Arbitration

  • Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators that checkuser and oversight blocks must not be reversed or modified without prior consultation with the checkuser or oversighter who placed the block, the respective functionary team, or the Arbitration Committee.

Miscellaneous



Wikidata weekly summary #401

Wikidata weekly summary #402

Wikidata weekly summary #403

Wikidata weekly summary #404

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day, Ezhiki, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Bobherry Talk Edits 14:04, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – March 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2020).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops must not undo or alter CheckUser or Oversight blocks, rather than should not.
  • A request for comment confirmed that sandboxes of established but inactive editors may not be blanked due solely to inactivity.

Technical news

  • Following a discussion, Twinkle's default CSD behavior will soon change, most likely this week. After the change, Twinkle will default to "tagging mode" if there is no CSD tag present, and default to "deletion mode" if there is a CSD tag present. You will be able to always default to "deletion mode" (the current behavior) using your Twinkle preferences.

Miscellaneous



Wikidata weekly summary #405

Wikidata weekly summary #406

Wikidata weekly summary #407

Title of Belogorsk

Hi. Since you’ve previously moved this article, perhaps you should add your opinion at Talk:Belogorsk (Crimea)#Article title. Thanks. Michael Z. 2020-03-19 23:04 z

Wikidata weekly summary #408

Wikidata weekly summary #409

Administrators' newsletter – April 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2020).

Guideline and policy news

  • There is an ongoing request for comment to streamline the source deprecation and blacklisting process.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • The WMF has begun a pilot report of the pages most visited through various social media platforms to help with anti-vandalism and anti-disinformation efforts. The report is updated daily and will be available through the end of May.

Wikidata weekly summary #410

Wikidata weekly summary #411

Хотел бы посоветоваться с вами

Здравствуйте, Ezhiki! Хотел бы у вас совет насчёт правок в английской википедии. Дело в что в англоязычной версии статьи про якутов, название "якуты" заменили на самоназвание "саха" и впридачу переназывают статьи по такой же логике. Пытался исправить их правки, но всё вернули обратно, да к тому же Якутию вообще переименовали в Саха и впрадачу запретили переименовывать статьи. Даже не знаю с кем посоветоваться и кому обратиться. Знания английского языка нехватает что вести полноценные дискуссии и защитить статьи от неконструктивных правок.

Wikidata weekly summary #412

Wikidata weekly summary #413

Administrators' newsletter – May 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2020).

Administrator changes

removed GnangarraKaisershatnerMalcolmxl5

CheckUser changes

readded Callanecc

Oversight changes

readded HJ Mitchell

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Miscellaneous


Wikidata weekly summary #414

Article titles for rivers in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus

Hi, since you were involved in previous naming discussions, would you like to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rivers#Article titles for rivers in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus? Markussep Talk 08:04, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #415

Wikidata weekly summary #416

Notice

The article Privokzalny (inhabited locality) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Set index isn't necessary. None of the links have an article at all.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Koridas (...Puerto Rico for statehood!) 23:46, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a comment on the talk page explaining why the prod request is invalid. I cannot decline the prod myself, being the article's author.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); May 21, 2020; 00:12 (UTC)

Administrative divisions of Moscow Oblast

Hi Ezhiki, I hope you are doing fine. I understand that you are taking a break and rarely appear here, but I will leave this in hope you may want to react. As you probably know, last year Moscow Oblast eliminates all the districts, converting them into cities under oblast jurisdiction. This means a lost of oir articles need to be moved, and a lot more need to be updated. I postponed it, but I feel now the info is outdetad, and needs to updated somehow. I started by moving Taldomsky District into City under oblast jurisdiction of Taldom, which now needs to be updated first, and I will try to do it, but I feel that I might have insufficient understanding of all the details. So if you at some point would feel like taking it up (cleaning even one article would already very helpful, since I can then apply the pattern to other articles), you are by all means welcome to do it. I do not think we even have separate articles on cities of federal subject significance, so I do not even know what would be the best way to approach this.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:33, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikidata weekly summary #417

User Валко and his original researches on the Bashkortostan topics

Hello, I need administrator's help in resolving the conflict over the topics related to Bashkortostan. Last few days there is edit war with user Валко participation on the pages Bashkortostan, History of Bashkortostan and Bashkir Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic. The main discussion is here.

At first, the essence of the conflict and a brief background. In March 2019 Russian Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee imposed for this user ban for any edits related to the establishment date of Bashkir ASSR. After user was indefinitely blocked in RuWiki in particular for his contribution on Bashkir/Bashkortostan topics. After his blocking in RuWiki user introduces his original researches in English Wikipedia.

User claims that Bashkir Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic was not Autonomous Republic before 1925. Based on this, user removes Autonomous word from articles and changed Bashkir ASSR to Bashkir Soviet Republic (1, 2). His typical practice - give a bunch of links, none of which confirms his theories. For example, on the talk page of Bashkortostan article user gave seven links, which allegedly say that Bashkir ASSR was not Autonomous Republic before 1925. But no one of this links does not contain this statement. Moreover, this links indicates that the Bashkir Republic was autonomous since it's foundation in 1919 (1, 2 - links shown by him). I think this is an example of disruptive behavior of this user and an attempt to mislead other users.

Of course, Bashkir ASSR had different variants of names at the time of it's foundation. Among them were Autonomous Bashkir Soviet Republic (ABSR), Bashkir Soviet Republic (BSR) and others. But, firstly, user ignores the fact that Bashkir ASSR was Autonomous Republic since it's establishment and for this reason he removes Autonomous word from articles. Secondly, the variant BASSR is the most recognizable and widespread, and no reason to replace it with others variants. Google Books search-test: "Bashkir Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic" (164 results), "Autonomous Bashkir Soviet Republic" (15 results), "Bashkir Soviet Republic" (BSR - ABSR = 29 - 15 = 14 results), "Autonomous Soviet Bashkir Republic" (9 results). User does not explain why from different variants of names (BASSR, ABSR, BSR, ASBR) he chose BSR. Obviously, he is confused by the presence of the word Autonomous in the name of Republic.

User also denies the fact that the BASSR was the first autonomous republic in RSFSR and removes this along with the source Great Soviet Encyclopedia. The GSE contains the following text: BASSR was the first autonomous Soviet republic in the RSFSR (Russian text: явилась первой автономной советской республикой в составе РСФСР). But Валко introduces original research that German Republic and Turkestan Republic founded earlier than Bashkir ASSR. But German Autonomy and Turkestan Republic were not autonomous republics on the time of their establishment, they became autonomous republics later. German Autonomy became autonomous republic only in 1923 (document by Soviet Govement). Turkestan Republic became autonomous republic in 1920 after approval of the Constitution on 9th Congress of Soviets of Turkestan. Great Russian Encyclopedia contains this information - Autonomous Republic since 1920 (Russian text: с 1920 – ТАССР). To prove his original research Валко brings the text from the GRE article where allegedly says that BASSR was second republic: В октябре 1918 в Поволжье возникло первое национально-государственное образование в РСФСР – Немцев Поволжья трудовая коммуна<...> В марте 1919 из южной части Уфимской губернии и северной части Оренбургской губернии организована вторая национальная автономия – т.н. малая Башкирская АССР.. But this fragment does not say that BASSR was a second Autonomous Republic.

Also user defends the idea that Bashkir ASSR was not established in 1919 (1, 2). But members of Russian Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee and mediators on Bashkir-Tatar topics found this theory false. 1919 year as a establishment date of BASSR is accepted in specialized scientific literature.

Probably, may be better if you find out opinion about this user, his original researches, his editing and discussion methods from Russian Wikipedia's administrators, mediators on Bashkir-Tatar topics and members of Arbitration Committee (Helgo13, La loi et la justice, Андрей Романенко, Vladimir Solovjev, Q-bit array).

If my request is difficult for you, I can find another administrator or mediator for this. Thank you. --Rg102 21:51, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]