Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring

Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard
This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule. See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report. If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page. You must notify any user you have reported. You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so. You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. Additional notes When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first. The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from. Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection. Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed. Definition of edit warring Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring. Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR) An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions. Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.
Click here to create a new report

User:Agent.registry reported by User:Fylindfotberserk (Result: Indef)

Page

Santali language (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Agent.registry (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. Edit war continues on 16 December 2019
   1. diff - 16 December 2019 Edit war continues
   2. diff - 16 December 2019 Edit war continues
2. Consecutive edits made from 15:03, 15 December 2019 (UTC) to 15:04, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
   1. 15:03, 15 December 2019 (UTC) "Added multiple issues template."
   2. 15:04, 15 December 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 930741939 by Fylindfotberserk (talk)"
3. Consecutive edits made from 13:03, 14 December 2019 (UTC) to 13:14, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
   1. 13:03, 14 December 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 930708898 by Austronesier (talk)"
   2. 13:06, 14 December 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 930709400 by Austronesier (talk)"
   3. 13:14, 14 December 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 930709273 by Austronesier (talk)"
4. Consecutive edits made from 10:05, 14 December 2019 (UTC) to 10:17, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
   1. 10:05, 14 December 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 930631112 by Austronesier (talk)"
   2. 10:06, 14 December 2019 (UTC) "/* Morphology */corrected format type."
   3. 10:16, 14 December 2019 (UTC) "Added update needed for the section as the content is not up-to-date."
   4. 10:17, 14 December 2019 (UTC) ""
5. Consecutive edits made from 18:45, 13 December 2019 (UTC) to 19:15, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
   1. 18:45, 13 December 2019 (UTC) "added not verified as it is misleading."
   2. 18:47, 13 December 2019 (UTC) "minor grammatical error."
   3. 18:50, 13 December 2019 (UTC) "removed noun as no content was added."
   4. 18:51, 13 December 2019 (UTC) "removed duplicate entry."
   5. 18:55, 13 December 2019 (UTC) "added citation needed template."
   6. 19:01, 13 December 2019 (UTC) "Added reliability template."
   7. 19:15, 13 December 2019 (UTC) "Added multiple issues template."
6. Consecutive edits made from 18:24, 13 December 2019 (UTC) to 18:40, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
   1. 18:24, 13 December 2019 (UTC) "added citation needed template."
   2. 18:25, 13 December 2019 (UTC) "grammatical error rectified."
   3. 18:36, 13 December 2019 (UTC) "removed contents as it was based on munda.As of my knowledge,santal language came to India from the north east region and this content talks about munda language.So some discussion is required.((talk

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 16:12, 14 December 2019 (UTC) "Warning: Vandalism on Santali language. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

1. [1] "Attempt to resolve"
2. [2] "Second attempt to resolve"

Comments:

This person doesn't even know how the "Multiple issues" maintenance template works. Which has been explained by me and User:Austronesier in the edit summaries and their talk page more than once. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:13, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

Keeps edit warring [3], [4]. Doesn't respond in talkpage [5]. Keeps unnecessarily warning me of 3RR instead [6] only after my first revert and then edit wars in my talkpage too [7]. This person obviously has WP:CIR issues if they do not know the usage of Template:Multiple issues which has been explained by me and other users many times. We have specifically told them not to use it to show their grievances with the article, which is not the intended purpose of the "Multiple issues" template. Instead they keep on adding their own POV on how the article is unreliable and stuff. Their exact wording in the template "Sources and demographic data are not up-to-date.Also,some citations are invalid or make no sense." as seen in this edit. To note, an update template has already been placed in the respective demographics section and an "unreliable sources" tag on the lead. That makes usage of the Multiple templae totally unjust, but the user seems adamant on it and keeps edit warring. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:17, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Also deleted my talk in the talk page here. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:25, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

• Comment: I can confirm Fylindfotberserk's observations. This is a clear case of WP:NOTHERE. –Austronesier (talk) 10:37, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Look at this recent comment [8] by Agent.registry. The aweful usage of a template along with snark comments and usage of slangs in the comment makes a clear case of WP:CIR and WP:NOTHERE. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:48, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Blocked – 31 hours. EdJohnston (talk) 17:25, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

• Now blocked indef by a checkuser. EdJohnston (talk) 18:57, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

User:2a00:23c5:8405:fa00:b807:7259:2e2f:125a reported by User:Beshogur (Result: Semi)

Page

Syrian Turkmen (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

2a00:23c5:8405:fa00:b807:7259:2e2f:125a (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. [9]
2. [10]
3. [11]

Comments:

This user making disruptive edits. Possible a sockpuppet and cursing me in Turkish " salakmisin lan sen? " (are you an idiot?) Beshogur (talk) 19:23, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

User:Beshogur, please try to notify this editor. (The link to their talk page is still red). If you don't manage to get a response, I am willing to try semiprotection. The alternative is a block of Special:Contributions/2a00:23c5:8405:fa00:b807:7259:2e2f:125a/64. This person appears to have some knowledge, but the personal attack isn't acceptable. EdJohnston (talk) 17:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

• Result: Semiprotected 6 months due to an IP-hopping edit warrior. This might be the same person as Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mar400r/Archive. This editor was known for posting about Turkic minorities in various countries. They had over 50 named socks. One of the socks who edited this article was SyrioTurkicHuman last May. Page was also edited by a sock of Joohnny braavoo1. EdJohnston (talk) 18:25, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

User:122.170.21.91 reported by User:Ifnord (Result: Warnings)

Page

Chandala (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

122.170.21.91 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. [12]
2. 17:55, 16 December 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 931055550 by Ifnord (talk) unexplained rollback abuse"
3. 17:53, 16 December 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 931055088 by Ifnord (talk) unexplained rollback abuse"
4. 17:48, 16 December 2019 (UTC) "I provided reasonable explanations for all edits"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 17:52, 16 December 2019 (UTC) "Caution: Removal of content, blanking on Chandala. (TW)"
2. 17:54, 16 December 2019 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring. (TW)"
3. 17:56, 16 December 2019 (UTC) "Warning: Vandalism on Chandala. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

Is OP a bot or something? Regardless of being unresponsive,[13] this user is clearly abusing WP:ROLLBACK and this user-right should be taken away from him. He is re-adding this source[14] which is not even supporting the information and also reinstating self-published source like Patridge publishing. 122.170.21.91 (talk) 18:00, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Is IP a registered editor who is hiding because they're making controversial changes to an issue they're bonded to? (Not a real question, simply illustrating that it's nonconstructive to simply toss around labels.) At any rate, if you look closer, it's not rollback but TW. I simply patrol pages, looking for vandalisms such as the removal of referenced material without discussion on article's talk page. Ifnord (talk) 18:28, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Removing unsourced content, content unsupported by reference and removing self-published source does not constitute 'vandalism'. You need to slow down with your reverts. 122.170.21.91 (talk) 18:33, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

• Result: Both warned. This dispute is heading toward blocks if people continue to make large changes without getting consensus first on the talk page. You could ask for opinions at WT:INDIA if you need wider participation. To an outsider, it is not really clear what the dispute is about. There is a claim of unsourced material but I don't know what part is unsourced. The IP is claiming rollback abuse but neither of Ifnord's changes is marked as a rollback. EdJohnston (talk) 03:57, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

User:173.176.159.21 reported by User:NorthBySouthBaranof (Result: Page protected)

Page

Tim Pool (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

173.176.159.21 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 19:24, 16 December 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 931066524 by NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) Noy true. BLP guidelines stipulate contentious stuff must be removed. Any addition requires consensus. No, your addition wasn't there about a month ago. please consult BLP guidelines and the talk page."
2. 19:10, 16 December 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 931020584 by NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) You need consensus. Please consult the talk page, topic already covered there in great details and length. WP:BLP"
3. 09:18, 16 December 2019 (UTC) "Undid revision 930948724 by Wallyfromdilbert (talk) Talk page was crystal clear about adding either conspiracy theorist or right wing. get consent first for addition. please consult the talk page. subject already devlopped in length and a vote occured on this specificly"
4. 00:40, 16 December 2019 (UTC) "removed reference to unsubstanciated smear piece"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 19:28, 16 December 2019 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Tim Pool. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

Offered the opportunity to self-revert - they did, and then promptly undid their own self-revert. User was previously blocked 48h for disruptive editing on American politics pages. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 19:34, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Page protected – 10 days by User:El C. EdJohnston (talk) 04:11, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

blp guidelines my friend. apply them or lose by them. With love.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.176.159.21 (talk) 01:25, 18 December 2019 (UTC) 

User:113.30.156.69 reported by User:VQuakr (Result: Blocked)

Page

Astrology and science (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

113.30.156.69 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 22:13, 16 December 2019 (UTC) "added reference, as asked by a user."
2. 20:57, 16 December 2019 (UTC) "Gauquelin asked the committee to remove athletes who didn't meet the criteria of "eminence" Link - http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.550.7941&rep=rep1&type=pdf"
3. 07:21, 16 December 2019 (UTC) "https://www.skepsis.nl/blog/wp-content/uploads/kurtz-etal.pdf - The original paper by Gauquelins opponents that says Gauquelin wanted some athletes on grounds of eminence. Anyone who reverts this edit, EXPLAIN."
4. 21:41, 15 December 2019 (UTC) "Gauquelin asked the committee to remove athletes who didn't meet the criteria of "eminence" Link - http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.550.7941&rep=rep1&type=pdf"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. [15]

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

1. 20:55, 16 December 2019 (UTC) "/* Accusations of Removal of Subjects on grounds of Eminence */ exclude"
2. 21:34, 16 December 2019 (UTC) "/* Accusations of Removal of Subjects on grounds of Eminence */ re"

Comments:

Notified: [16]. VQuakr (talk) 02:33, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Blocked – 48 hours. The IP user has also been triggering the edit filter by removing sourced content from other articles. EdJohnston (talk) 19:06, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

User:Cathytalledo reported by User:Migsmigss (Result: Blocked)

Page

Miss Universe Philippines (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Cathytalledo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 08:39, 17 December 2019 (UTC) "Reverted; Unsourced information; Vandalism"
2. Consecutive edits made from 00:04, 17 December 2019 (UTC) to 00:05, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
   1. 00:04, 17 December 2019 (UTC) "Reorganize and added deleted information."
   2. 00:05, 17 December 2019 (UTC) "Excess information"
3. 23:50, 16 December 2019 (UTC) "Useless information"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 15:33, 17 December 2019 (UTC) "Only warning: Removal of content, blanking on Miss Universe Philippines. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

Consistently deletes duly sourced information and insists on her own edit, calling other editor's edits vandalism when all contents supplied by editors are duly sourced, as could be seen here. This user has never tried to engage in dispute resolution, and instead has continuously blanked warnings on their talk page, as could be seen here, here, here, and here. They also copied and pasted a warning a placed on their wall, to my own wall, complete with my own signature, as could be seen here and here.

I have tried placing a warning on this user several times, hoping they would engage in edit and dispute resolution, but to no avail. This has already gone beyond my and other users' final warning. I hope you could look into this contributor and employ necessary action. Thanks so much. Migsmigss (talk) 15:45, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Blocked – 31 hours. This user edit wars, makes false charges of vandalism and removes sources without explanation. For example, here she removes several sources and then in the edit summary complains about unsourced information. No use of the article talk page whatever. EdJohnston (talk) 19:23, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

User: Paradise Chronicle reported by User:175.203.103.219 (Result: Filer blocked)

Page: Diyarbakır (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Paradise Chronicle (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to:

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [17]
2. [18]
3. [19]
4. [20]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

Comments:
User violate the 3RR within 24 hours. 175.203.103.219 (talk) 00:13, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Hey there. I have been attempting to contain of a major vandal here is his edit historial. He is the same who reported me here. He removed all things mentioning Kurdish or Kurds. I and Semsuri have tried to contain the damage and revert as much as we could.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 00:19, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Because the Kurdish names were not sourced. And in the Diyarbakır article I have two times said to you to use the talk page to explain but you just ignored it.[21][22]. 175.203.103.219 (talk) 00:24, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

@175.203.103.219: I won't comment on the specific article or the 3RR but the onus to open a discussion is on you since you are the one making major changes to the lead (see WP:BRD). Though I would note that Paradise should've explained themselves in the edit summaries better. Gotitbro (talk) 00:46, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

This report is ridiculous. The IP has been editing disruptively and now reports an user who has spent a lot of time cleaning up his traces. --Semsurî (talk) 00:24, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

• Should be noted that the IP has been disruptively editing articles on Turkish places with Kurdish majority populaces, wholesale removing Kurdish place names from ledes while ostensibly asking for sources. The IP user could've simply tagged the names as such or even added sources themselves (no dearth of Kurdish language sources for Kurdish settlements [even official ones] as demonstrated by @Paradise Chronicle:). This can only be termed as bad faith editing on part of the IP to remove Kurdish names from ledes of articles. Then to go report editors who have tried to undo the disruptions by even adding sources for these place names is simply a laughable attempt by the IP. Gotitbro (talk) 00:34, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

I have told him at the beginning it would be better if he'd mark the info with source needed instead of removing the info. That Diyarbakir is the Capital of Diyarbakir province was already present in the lead where you wanted to add it. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 00:43, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

User:175.203.103.219 has been blocked for disruptive editing by User:Ad Orientem, who may not be aware of this report. Bishonen | talk 15:59, 18 December 2019 (UTC).

Bishonen, Ad Orientem, seems that we have a sock puppet --> 118.18.179.54. This editor picks up where 175.203.103.219 left. --Semsurî (talk) 22:36, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

@ Bishonen and Semsûrî: Just as an fyi; I am currently traveling and will be online irregularly, if at all, over the next few days. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:00, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

• Result: The filer of this report, Special:Contributions/175.203.103.219, has been blocked 31 hours for disruptive editing by User:Ad Orientem per an AIV report, probably this one. The filer of the AIV, User:Paradise Chronicle, says that the IP ''removes all references to Kurdish or Kurds. At least as far as I have observed. Me and Semsuri are trying to contain the damage. (keep it short)". EdJohnston (talk) 20:22, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

User:Kazemita1 reported by User:BarcrMac (Result: Stale, warning)

Page: People's Mujahedin of Iran (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Kazemita1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

• " and "continued to conduct limited terrorist attacks in Iran for years".

1. 15:30, 13 December 2019
2. 10:52, 13 December 2019
3. 18:13, 4 December 2019
4. 17:14, 29 November 2019
5. 05:50, 29 November 2019

• " shadowy outfit with little support inside Iran"

1. 15:30, 13 December 2019
2. 10:52, 13 December 2019
3. 08:20, 6 December 2019
4. 18:19, 4 December 2019

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: link

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: diff

Comments:

Continuing edit warring in an article that has revert restrictions. The bold edits show continuing to edit war of these edits after being blocked (for the second time) for edit warring in this page.Barca (talk) 11:10, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

I was blocked on Dec. 10th because I engaged in edit waring. Barca, the user who initiated this report was also blocked shortly after. The reason why me, Barca and two other editors were blocked was due to Barca's edit on December 9th. As soon as my block period was over, I stated an apology in the talk page of the article in dispute and restored the article to the version that Barca and the other two editors insisted on during the edit war. Here is the diff between Barca's last edit on Dec. 9th and my edit right after my block period was over that shows they are the same word for word. Since then, I have been discussing things in the talk page and also have asked Barca in his talk page to help come up with a list of things he wants in the article so that the two of us can figure out a middle-ground solution.Kazemita1 (talk) 12:27, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

p.s. The two sentences that Barca marked in green in this report existed in Barca's last edit on December 9th as well as in the version of the article proposed by two other editors on December 10th.--Kazemita1 (talk) 12:36, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

User Ypatch said they did not endorse these edits, so please don't drag them into this. As soon as the block was over, you added text that had been reverted during the edit war which did not belong to the long-standing version of the article. The diffs presented outline this. Barca (talk) 13:45, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

I did not name any users (but you just did!). And I have addressed your last concern here in the talk page of the article.Kazemita1 (talk) 18:48, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Stale – No block for Dec. 13 violations on Dec. 19 unless they are blatant and easy to see. But still, I'm warning User:Kazemita1 for making edits for which consensus is not clear. Merely making arguments in your own edit summary is not enough evidence of consensus. I would like to see a clear agreement by others on the talk page that your change has support. The argument that the material 'used to be in the article at one time', or that 'Joe Smith supported this version in a past dispute' surely doesn't prove that it enjoys consensus to go in right now. EdJohnston (talk) 21:54, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

User:86.8.200.145 reported by User:CLCStudent (Result: )

Page

Helstrom (TV series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

86.8.200.145 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 14:07, 19 December 2019 (UTC) "Dude stop ignoring what I’m saying I literally linked an article which states Gabriella Rossetti is a version of Gabriel the Devil Hunter and this doesn’t constitute as original research as it’s very much confirmed it’s a female version of Gabriel Rossetti as they literally just added La on the end and Rossetti can either be spelled like that or Rossetti"
2. Consecutive edits made from 13:54, 19 December 2019 (UTC) to 13:57, 19 December 2019 (UTC)
   1. 13:54, 19 December 2019 (UTC) "I don’t need to take this to the talk page as it is confirmed to be Gabriel Rossetti, just look at the article I linked, clearly cites the deadline article and elaborates further https://comicsheatingup.net/2019/10/10/hulus-helstrom-characters-cast-revealed/"
   2. 13:57, 19 December 2019 (UTC) "I don’t need to take this to the talk page as it is confirmed to be Gabriel Rossetti, just look at the article I linked, clearly cites the deadline article and elaborates further about helstrom being Gabriel the Devil Hunter https://comicsheatingup.net/2019/10/10/hulus-helstrom-characters-cast-revealed/"
3. 13:46, 19 December 2019 (UTC) "Can you just leave it alone and stop vandalising it, her name is Gabriella Rossetti and Gabriel the Devil hunters real name is Gabriel Rossetti they just added an la on the end of Gabriel to signify that it’s a female version, and anyway the devil hunter is just a title it’s not his actual name as stated before."

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 13:48, 19 December 2019 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Helstrom (TV series). (TW)"
2. 13:56, 19 December 2019 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Helstrom (TV series). (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

She was initially warring under user:86.8.201.145 and then changed to this current IP address. CLCStudent (talk) 14:09, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

User:Theofilos1964 reported by User:Escape Orbit (Result: Sock indeffed)

Page

French People (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Theofilos1964 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 07:41, 19 December 2019 (UTC) "/* Citizenship and legal residence */ethnicity = French people | speakers = 76.8 million worldwide "
2. 13:15, 18 December 2019 (UTC) "/* Citizenship and legal residence */ethnicity = French people | speakers = 76.8 million worldwide"
3. 05:27, 18 December 2019 (UTC) ""
4. 18:49, 17 December 2019 (UTC) ""
5. 17:33, 17 December 2019 (UTC) ""
6. 17:21, 17 December 2019 (UTC) "| speakers = 76.8 million worldwide | speakers2 = An estimated 274 million French speakers (L1 plus L2; 2014)

warnings

1. 17:11, 17 December 2019 (UTC) "/* Population figures */ new section"
2. 17:27, 17 December 2019 (UTC) "you need to cite it"
3. 17:30, 17 December 2019 (UTC) "A count of people who speak the French language is not the same as a count of French people"
4. 17:39, 17 December 2019 (UTC) "Caution: Unconstructive editing on French people."

Comments:

Repeatedly reverting to unsourced figure and disruptive editing by changing article definition without consensus. Similar behaviour on Bajuni people. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 17:08, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

• Blocked indefinitely as a sock.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:06, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

User:Factsinwiki reported by User:Coltsfan (Result: )

Page: Alliance for Brazil (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Factsinwiki (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: diff preferred, link permitted

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. diff
2. diff
3. diff
4. diff

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: diff

Comments:
This a repeat of a previous request, because the behaviour of user Factsinwiki didn't change. Late november, he engaged in similar actions (diff, diff, diff e diff), but the page was protected and that was that. A discussion in the talk page was open while the article was protected in older to solve the situation. The user in question, didn't take part in the discussion. He later added a topic outside of the discussion (was called on that), not adressing the issues in the discussion or presenting sources. Anyways, he was first reverted and i left him a message directing him to the discussion, but he deleted the message (which i interpretate as an anknolodgement of the post) and continue with the WP:EW. Since he has a history of deleting messages and since this is his second EW/3RR violation in less than an month, i'm taking this situation here for evaluation. Coltsfan (talk) 20:42, 19 December 2019 (UTC)