From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Paramatma)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Paramatman (Sanskrit: परमात्मन्, IAST: Paramātmāṇ) or Paramātmā is, according to the principle scripture of Hinduism, Lord Krishna Himself[1][2], the Absolute Atman, or supreme Self, in various philosophies such as the Vedanta and Yoga schools in Hindu theology, as well as other Indian religions like Sikhism. The Paramatman is the "Primordial Self" or the "Self Beyond" who is spiritually practically identical with the Absolute, identical with the Brahman. Selflessness is the attribute of Paramatman, where all personality/individuality vanishes.[3]


The word stem paramātman (परमात्मन्, pronounced [pɐɽɐmaːtmɐn], its nominative singular being paramātmā — परमात्मा, pronounced [pɐɽɐmaːtmaː]) is formed from two words, parama, meaning "supreme" or "highest", and ātma, which means individual self.

The word "Ātman" generally denotes the Individual Soul[4], but by the word "Paramatma" refers to Lord Krishna [2]

Paramatman in Jain theology[edit]

In Jainism, each atman or individual self is a potential Paramatman or God, both are essentially the same. It remains as atman only because of its binding "karmic" limitations, until such time as those limitations are removed. As Paramatman, the atman represents the ultimate point of spiritual evolution.[5]

Even though Jain mysticism centers around Atman and Paramatman because it believes in the existence of soul, in Jainism, which accepts neither Vedic authority nor Monism, all enlightened souls are referred to as Paramatman and regarded as gods. Jainism honours the soul of each man as its own eternally distinct savior.[6] Since the Paramatman of Jainism is unable to create and govern the world, there is no place of God as a creator and bestower of fortune.[7]

Paramatman in Buddhism[edit]

Buddhism rejects a metaphysics of "ground" such as the paramatman.

Description of Paramatman in the Upanishads[edit]

The sage of the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad IV.4.2, though not using the word "Paramatman", explains that at the time of release the portion (aspect) of the Paramatman and the portion (aspect) of the Jiva presiding in the right eye become unified with the Paramatman and the Jiva presiding in the heart, then the Jiva does not see, smell, taste, speak, hear, feel, touch and know; when Paramatman goes out, the Chief Prana goes out after Him, followed by the Lower Prana. Paramatman goes out riding on the Jiva following consciousness and work, knowledge of former life or natural capacity. In the Prashna Upanishad IV.11 the word "Atman" cannot refer to Jiva because the Jiva cannot of its own accord throw off its body or understand avidya, therefore, it refers to Paramatman.[8] The Jiva attains Moksha when he actually knows the Paramatman, the Asarira Prajnatman, to be thousand-headed, to be the governor of all and to be superior to all.[9] Thus, Paramatman is one of the many aspects of Brahman and has all attributes of Brahman.[10] Atman (Spirit) and Paramatman (God) are one, some say they are distinct as well as one, they are one with reference to Shakti but distinct with reference to that power.[11]

Parable of the Two Birds[edit]

The word, Paramatman, is not to be found in the Rig Veda but through allusion referring to Paramatman as Isha. This distinction is made because all of its mantras which in the form of prayers are addressed to gods. In its great Riddle Hymn (Sukta I.164) is the famous mantra - R.V.I.164.20, that was revealed to Rishi Deergatamaah Auchathyah and borrowed by Mundaka Upanishad III.1.1-3, which belongs to Atharva Veda, to weave the parable of the Two Birds:

Transference of the atomic individual soul to another body is made possible by the grace of the Supersoul. The Supersoul fulfills the desire of the atomic soul as one friend fulfills the desire of another. The Vedas, like the Muṇḍaka Upaniṣad, as well as the Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad, compare the soul and the Supersoul to two friendly birds sitting on the same tree. One of the birds (the individual atomic soul) is eating the fruit of the tree, and the other bird (Kṛṣṇa) is simply watching His friend. Of these two birds—although they are the same in quality—one is captivated by the fruits of the material tree, while the other is simply witnessing the activities of His friend. Kṛṣṇa is the witnessing bird, and Arjuna is the eating bird. Although they are friends, one is still the master and the other is the servant. Forgetfulness of this relationship by the atomic soul is the cause of one's changing his position from one tree to another, or from one body to another. The jīva soul is struggling very hard on the tree of the material body, but as soon as he agrees to accept the other bird as the supreme spiritual master—as Arjuna agreed to do by voluntary surrender unto Kṛṣṇa for instruction—the subordinate bird immediately becomes free from all lamentations. Both the Muṇḍaka Upaniṣad (3.1.2) and Śvetāśvatara Upaniṣad (4.7) confirm this:
samāne vṛkṣe puruṣo nimagno
'nīśayā śocati muhyamānaḥ
juṣṭaṁ yadā paśyaty anyam īśam
asya mahimānam iti vīta-śokaḥ "Although the two birds are in the same tree, the eating bird is fully engrossed with anxiety and moroseness as the enjoyer of the fruits of the tree. But if in some way or other he turns his face to his friend who is the Lord and knows His glories—at once the suffering bird becomes free from all anxieties." Arjuna has now turned his face towards his eternal friend, Kṛṣṇa, and is understanding the Bhagavad-gītā from Him. And thus, hearing from Kṛṣṇa, he can understand the supreme glories of the Lord and be free from lamentation.[12]
Translation by A.C.Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada

Case of Two souls[edit]

The Dualistic School of Philosophy initiated by Anandatirtha draws its support from the afore-cited passage as well as from the passage of Katha Upanishad I.3.1 of an earlier Upanishad that speaks about two souls which taste the fruits of action, both of which are lodged in the recess of the human heart, and which are different from each other as light and shade, that carried the flaw – how could the Universal soul be regarded as enjoying the fruits of action? The followers of Madhava draw their support from the Bhagavad Gita XV.16 that speaks about two persons in this world, the Mutable and the Immutable; the Mutable is all these things, while the Immutable is the one who exists at the top of them, one is the Jivatman and the other, Paramatman.[13] Jivatman is chit, the sentient, and Paramatman is Isvara, both have the same attributes; they are inseparably present together on the tree which is achit, the insentient, or the gross Avidya component of existence. Jivatman and Paramatman are both seated in the heart, the former is driven by the three modes of nature and acts, the latter simply witnesses as though approving the former's activities.[14] The relationship between Paramātmā, the Universal Self, and 'ātma, the Individual Self, is likened to the indwelling God and the soul within one's heart. Paramatman is one of the many aspects of Brahman. Paramatman is situated at the core of every individual jiva in the macrocosm. The Upanishads do compare Atman and Paramatman to two birds sitting like friends on the branch of a tree (body) where the Atman eats its fruits (karma), and the Paramatman only observes the Atman as a witness (sākṣin) of His friend's actions.


In Advaita philosophy, individual souls are called Jīvātman, and the Highest Brahman is called Paramātman. The Jivatman and the Paramatman are known to be one and the same when the Jivatman attains the true knowledge of the Brahman (Skt. Brahmajñāna) . In the context of Advaita, the word Paramatman is invariably used to refer to Nirguna Brahman, with Ishvara and Bhagavan being terms used to refer to Brahman with qualities, or Saguna Brahman.

Brahman and Isvara are not synonymous words, the apparent similarity is on account of similar looking attributes imagined with regard to the impressions these two words activate. According to Advaita, Isvara is Brahman associated with Maya in its excellent aspect, as the empirical reality it is the determinate Brahman; Isvara has no reality apart from Brahman. The Svetasvatara Upanishad developed the conception of a personal God. The Katha Upanishad states that never has any man been able to visualise Paramatman by means of sight, heart, imagination or mind. The Anandamaya-kosha is the Isvara of the Upanishads. Gaudapada called duality Maya, and non-duality, the only reality. Maya is the Cosmic Nescience that has in it the plurality of subject and object and therefore, Isvara is organically bound with the world. Beyond the Prana or Isvara is the state of the Infinite limitless Brahman[15] which is why in the Bhagavad Gita VII.24, Krishna tells Arjuna – "not knowing My unsurpassable and undecaying supreme nature the ignorant believe Me to have assumed a finite form through birth."

With regard to the cause of Samsāra, as to where it resides and the means of its removal, Adi Shankara in his Vivekachudamani.49. instructs that the individual self is the Paramatman in reality, the association of the individual self with ajnana i.e. with avidya, which he terms as anatmabandhah, bondage by the anatman or non-atman, makes it to identify itself with gross, subtle and causal bodies and from that arises Samsāra which is of the form of superimposition of qualities of sukha, dukha etc., on itself, the atman.[16]


Paramatman is beyond knowledge and ignorance, devoid of all material attributes (upadhi). In Chapter 13 of the Bhagavad Gita, Paramatman is described as Krishna residing in the hearts of all beings and in every atom of matter. He is the overseer and the permitter of their actions.[17][18] Paramatman is different from five elements (pancha mahabhutas), the senses, mind, pradhana and jiva.[19]

Vaishnava sects maintain that attaining knowledge of Brahman and identification of Atman with Brahman is an intermediate stage of self-realization, and only Bhakti Yoga can lead to the next step of Paramatman realization as the indwelling God, ultimately leading up to liberation (Mukti) by God-realization.

The Viṣṇu or the deity of the quality of goodness in the material world is the puruṣa-avatāra known as Kṣīrodakaśāyī Viṣṇu or Paramātmā.[1]

In Bengal, Vaishnava Krishna is viewed as one endowed with his essential svarupa-shakti, he is Bhagawat in full manifestation endowed with Jivasakti and Mayasakti, he the Paramatman and Brahman. Brahman, Paramatman and Bhagavan are 3 gradations of the ultimate reality.[20]


Time is described in Vedas:

My Lord, I consider Your Lordship to be eternal time, the supreme controller, without beginning and end, the all-pervasive one. ... Eternal time is the witness of all our actions, good and bad, and thus resultant reactions are destined by Him. It is no use saying that we do not know why and for what we are suffering. We may forget the misdeed for which we may suffer at this present moment, but we must remember that Paramātmā is our constant companion, and therefore He knows everything, past, present and future. And because the Paramātmā feature of Lord Kṛṣṇa destines all actions and reactions, He is the supreme controller also. Without His sanction not a blade of grass can move.[2]

See also[edit]


  1. ^ Prabhupada, Swami A.C.Bhaktivedanta (1972). Bhagavad Gita Chapter 13 Verse 23. BBT Publications. pp. Bg. 13.23.
  2. ^ a b Prabhupada, A.C Bhaktivedanta. Bhagavatam Canto 9 Chapter 23 Verse 20. BBT. pp. 9.23.20.
  3. ^ T. Depurucker. An Occult Glossary:A Comendium of Oriental and Theosophical Terms. Kessinger Publishing. p. 130.
  4. ^ Prabhupada, A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami. Bhagavad Gita Chapter 2 Verse 13. BBT. p. 2.13.
  5. ^ Encyclopaedia of Oriental Philosophy, Global Vision Publishing House, p. 245
  6. ^ Selwyn Gurney Champion, The World's Great Religions:An Anthology of Sacred Texts, Courier Dover Publications, p. 149
  7. ^ Arvind Sharma, A Jaina Perspective on the Philosophy of Religion, Motilal Banarsidass, p. 4
  8. ^ Baman Das Basu. The Sacred Books of the Hindus, Vol. 15. Part(2). Genesis Publishing (P) Ltd. p. 522,527.
  9. ^ B.D.Basu, S.C.Vasu. Brihadaranyaka Upanishad. Genesis Publishing (P) Ltd. p. 130.
  10. ^ Swami Tejomayanand. Dhanyashtakam. Chinmaya Mission.
  11. ^ Annie Wood Besant. Theosophist Magazine February-March 1909. Kessinger Publishing. p. 553.
  12. ^ Prabhupada, A.C Bhaktivedanta Swami (1972). Bhagavad-Gita As It Is. BBT. pp. Chapter 2. Verse 22.
  13. ^ Ramachandra Dattatrya Ranade. A constructive survey of Upanishadic philosophy. Mumbai: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan. p. 151.
  14. ^ "Two birds in a tree - Soul and Supersoul".
  15. ^ Ramachandra Dattatrya Ranade. A constructive survey of Upanishadic philosophy. Mumbai: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan. pp. 189–197.
  16. ^ Sri Chandrashekhara Bharati of Sringeri. Sri Samkara's Vivekacudamani. Mumbai: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan. p. 65.
  17. ^ Bhagavad Gita 13.23 Archived 12 March 2007 at the Wayback Machine
  18. ^ Bhagavata Purana 7.14.38 Archived 12 March 2007 at the Wayback Machine
  19. ^ Bhagavata Purana 3.28.41 Archived 17 February 2012 at the Wayback Machine
  20. ^ Sandhu Santidev. Traditions of Mysticism in Bengal. Genesis Publishing (P) Ltd. p. 101.

External links[edit]