Sikh state
 | This article is an orphan, as no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; try the Find link tool for suggestions. (August 2024) |
| Part of a series on |
| Sikhism |
|---|
 |
A Sikh state is one that is ruled by Sikhs.[1] There were various Sikh states, empires, and dynasties, beginning with the First Sikh State to the Sikh-ruled princely states of British India.
History
[edit]Theological underpinnings
[edit]The bards Satta Doom and Balvand Rai state the following in the Guru Granth Sahib regarding Guru Nanak establishing a raj (governance or rule):[2]
Nanak established the Dominion by raising
the fort of Truth on firm foundations …
With might and bravery of One’s wisdom-sword,
Perfection bestowed the gift of life …
The Light and the method were same,
the Sovereign only changed the body.
Impeccable Divine canopy waves,
the Throne of Guru-ship is occupied.— Satta Doom and Balvand Rai, Guru Granth Sahib, page 966
The Sikh concept of miri-piri emphasizes that spirituality and temporality are intrinsically linked to one another, legitimizing Sikh aims to establish their own sovereignty.[2] Guru Gobind Singh taught the principles of Raj Karega Khalsa as forming the basis for Sikh-rule.[2] In-response to a question posed by Bhai Nand Lal, the tenth guru responded as follows on the issue of sovereignty:[2]
Nand Lal, listen to this truth:
I will establish the Raj (Sovereignty). (56)
The four categories will become one category,
I will recite Vahiguru (Awe-Wisdom) recitation. (57)
[They will] mount horses and fly hawks,
The Turks (empire) will flee seeing them. (58)
I will make one fight a hundred and twenty-five thousand.
I will free those Singhs (warriors) who ascend (die). (59)
The spears will wave and the elephants will be caparisoned,
The nine-instruments will resound from gate to gate. (60)
When a hundred and twenty-five thousand guns will discharge,
Then the Khalsa will be victorious from wherever the sun shines and sets. (61)
The Khalsa will rule and no one will be a dissenter,
All will unite after exhaustion, those who take refuge will survive. (62)— Bhai Nand Lal of Goya, Nasihatnamah/Tankhahnamah, stanzas 56-62
Establishment of the first Sikh rule
[edit]The first Sikh polity, albeit a short-lived one, was founded by Banda Singh Bahadur in 1710, after his forces captured Sirhind and issued silver rupee coinage from the Mukhlisgarh Fort based at the Shivalik range.[3] This was a republic that existed from 1710 to 1716.[2] The issuing of coinage was a mark of sovereignty, marking the beginning of Banda's rule over Sirhind.[3] Furthermore, Banda rejected using both the traditional Indic Bikrami calendar and the Islamicate calendar, creating his own calendar where the first year commenced on the date of his victory over Sirhind.[3] Banda's state issued coins in the name of the Sikh gurus.[3]
Formation of the Sikh Confederacy
[edit]Between the period of 1726–1733, Zakaria Khan, the Mughal viceroy of Lahore province, enacted a genocidal policy against the Sikhs.[4] After the oppressive anti-Sikh government policy failed to get rid of the Sikh threat, the Mughal government decided to try pacifying the Sikhs by granting them an official jagir (estate) grant.[4] Upon Sikh request, a Nawab title was offered to the Sikhs, which was bestowed upon Kapur Singh in 1733 (since Darbara Singh had rejected it), alongside a khilat and bag of gold.[4] In 1734, Nawab Kapur Singh divided the Sikh congregation into two groups: the Taruna Dal and the Buddha Dal.[4] Each of these Dals ("armies") were further sub-divided into five groups (with Kapur Singh's own grouping being the additional).[4] After a short period of peace between the Mughals and Sikhs, differences between them started to grow again due to the restless and provocative antics of the Taruna Dal, and the Nawab-ship that was bestowed upon the Sikhs early by the Mughal Empire was revoked and the jagir was confiscated in 1735.[4] Thus, the former anti-Sikh genocidal policies of the Mughals was put in-place again and the Sikhs once again had to disperse to places of safe haven, such as the Lakhi Jungle.[4] With the invasion of India by Nadir Shah between January–May 1739 and the total destruction of the Mughal administration in the Punjab as a result, the Sikhs saw an opportunity for themselves and pillaged and sought revenge on their enemies.[4] On 1 July 1745, Zakarian Khan died and he was succeeded by less-effective Mughal administrators, such as Yahiya Khan.[4] After this point, Kapur Singh divided the Sikh congregation into twenty-five bands (jathas), with each band consisting of about a hundred young Sikh men under the command of a respective leader.[4] With this reform, a basic confederation structure for military activities of the Sikhs was forming shape.[4] After an initial invasion of India by Ahmad Shah Abdali, Kapur Singh realized that the Afghan invader would surely return for more loot, additionally due to the strict ruling-style of Moin-ul-Mulk, Kapur Singh resolved to reform the then sixty-five (the number of Sikh bands had since swelled from the twenty-five bands that had been established earlier) Sikh bands into eleven misls on the annual Vaisakhi gathering at Amritsar on 29 March 1748, establishing the Sikh Confederacy and its constituent misls, with the united army of all the Sikhs called the Dal Khalsa.[4] The earlier Taruna Dal and Buddha Dal division system that was established earlier in 1734 was retained, with each of the eleven misls being assigned as part of a dal, with the seminal division being as follows:[4]
Establishment of Sikh monarchies
[edit]
After the fall of Sirhind in 1763, many Sikh kingdoms began to take root after being founded by sardars of the precursory Sikh misls, such as Patiala, Jind, Nabha, Kalsia, Manimajra, and Kaithal.[5][6][7][8][9][10] The sarkar of Sirhind was cut-up and distributed amongst hundreds of both petty and prominent Sikh sardars.[11] The Sukerchakia Misl formed the Sikh Empire after the capture of Lahore in 1799.[12][13]
Khalistan movement
[edit]Some segments of the Sikh community advocate for an independent state called Khalistan.[14]
Administration
[edit]Parganas, 'ilaqa, and ta'alluqa administrative divisions of Sikh polities tended to much smaller scale in-size compared to the Mughal administrative system and more numerous.[11] An example of this is the Gujranwala district, which consisted of twenty-six ta'alluqas during Sikh-rule but three or four parganas during Mughal-rule.[11] An explanation of this is when Sikhs occupied formerly Mughal-controlled territory, they divied up the Mughal parganas amongst the Sikh sardars.[11] A subdivision of a pargana or ta'alluqa was a tappa or topes.[11] Sikh-rule over Kashmir led to the establishment of four new Kashmiri parganas.[11] The Mughal pargana was comparable in-nature to the Sikh ta'alluqa.[11] At the ta'alluqa-level, the Mughal office of the 'amil was comparable to the Sikh office of the kardar.[11] The basis of revenue administration came from the positions of the muqaddam, chaudhari, and the qanungo.[11]
The Sikh polities did not made radical changes to the pre-existing system but rather made slight changes, which do make them discernable from their predecessors.[11] Whilst in main areas during the Mughal-period the zabt method was predominant, during Sikh-rule it was the ghallabakhshi and kankut that were dominant.[11] However, the most dominant systems of assessment and collection during Sikh-rule were the batai and kankut, however the zabt method was employed in some areas.[11] Outside of main areas, older methods continued unabated for the most part.[11] The ijara practice became popularized during Sikh-rule but this method led to lower shares of produce being received by the state due to lower rates of assessment.[11]
The jagirs bestowed by Sikh states were similar to the mansabdari jagirs that were granted by the Mughals.[11] The dharmarth grants issued by Sikh states were similar to the madad-i-ma'ash grants of the Mughals.[11] A key difference however was the proportion of revenue alienated by the way of jagir was much smaller during Sikh-rule in-comparison to Mughal-rule.[11] However, the proportion of revenue alienated by the way of dharmarth was much larger during Sikh-rule compared to the predecessory Mughals.[11] Another difference was that the proportion of hereditary jagirs was larger during Sikh-rule.[11]
The three classes in-relation to land tenures was the same between Mughal and Sikh-rule:[11]
- Peasant proprieter – the most important position[11]
- Superior owner (zamindar or ta'alluqdar)[11]
- Tenant[11]
During Sikh-rule, the position of the peasant proprieter improved in-relation to the ta'alluqdar whilst the position of the tenant improved in-relation to the other two classes above it.[11] Sikh ruling classes receieved a relatively smaller share of surplus land revenue in-comparison to their Mughal counterparts, with the revenue during Sikh-rule being distributed to many sardars and rajas (with both being relatively equal in importance).[11] Thus, the peasant proprieter and tenant classes were able to enjoy much of the produce they produced.[11] During the reign of Ranjit Sikh of Lahore State, there were no instances of agricultural crisises.[11]
List of historical Sikh states and dynasties
[edit]![[icon]](/wiki/File:Wiki_letter_w_cropped.svg){kind=small} | This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (August 2024) |
The following list enumerates historical Sikh states, empires, and dynasties in chronological order, ordered by their establishment year:[15]
| No. | State or Dynasty | Established | Disestablished | Founder(s) | Capital(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | First Sikh State | 1709 | 1715 | Banda Singh Bahadur | Lohgarh | |
| 2. | Sikh Confederacy, including: | 1748 | 1799 | Nawab Kapur Singh (Sikh Confederacy)
|
Various[note 1] | |
| 3. | Patiala State | 1762 | 20 August 1948 | Ala Singh | Patiala | [16]: 1398 |
| 4. | Jind State | 1763 | 20 August 1948 | Gajpat Singh | Jind | [16]: 1395 |
| 5. | Nabha State | 1763 | 20 August 1948 | Hamir Singh | Nabha | [16]: 1398 [17] |
| 6. | Kalsia State | 1763 | 1948 | Gurbaksh Singh | Chhachhrauli | [16]: 1396 |
| 7. | Ladwa State | 1763 | 1846 | Gurdit Singh | Ladwa | |
| 8. | Faridkot State | 1763 | 20 August 1948 | Hamir Singh | Faridkot | [16]: 1395 |
| 9. | Manimajra State | 1764 | 1875 | Gharib Das | Manimajra | |
| 10. | Kaithal State | 1767 | 1843 | Desu Singh | Kaithal | |
| 11. | Kapurthala State | 1774 | 20 August 1948 | Jassa Singh | Kapurthala | [16]: 1396 |
| 12. | Sikh Empire | 1799 | 1849 | Ranjit Singh | Gujranwala (1799–1802)
Lahore (1802–1849) |
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ The capital varied by misl.
References
[edit]- ^ Singh, Gurbachan; Gyani, Lal Singh (1946). The Idea of the Sikh State. Lahore Book Shop.
- ^ a b c d e f Singh, Harinder (15 June 2020). "Raj Karega Khalsa: The Khalsa & The Rule". Sikh Research Institute. Retrieved 2023-05-10.
- ^ a b c d Madra, Amandeep Singh; Singh, Parmjit (27 September 2016). "Introduction". Sicques, Tigers or Thieves: Eyewitness Accounts of the Sikhs (1606–1810). Springer. p. xxx. ISBN 9781137119988.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z Gupta, Hari Ram (2007). History of the Sikhs: The Sikh Comrnonwealth or Rise and FalI of Sikh Misls. History of the Sikhs. Vol. IV. Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers. pp. 71–77. ISBN 8121501652.
- ^ Sharma, Suresh K. (2006). "History of Karnal: The Sikh Rule". Haryana: Past and Present. Mittal Publications. pp. 132–33. ISBN 9788183240468.
- ^ Singh, Bhagat (1993). "Chapter 14 - The Phulkian Misl". A History of the Sikh Misals. Publication Bureau, Punjabi University.
- ^ Gupta, Hari Ram (2007). History of the Sikhs: Sikh Commonwealth or Rise and Fall of Sikh Misls. History of the Sikhs. Vol. 4. Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers. pp. 158–160. ISBN 8121501652.
- ^ Sarkar, Jadunath (1964). Fall of the Mughal Empire. Vol. 3: 1771–1788 (3rd ed.). Orient Longman. p. 106.
- ^ Singh, Ganda, ed. (1986). The Punjab Past and Present. Part 2. Vol. 20. Patiala: Punjabi University, Patiala. pp. 396–398.
- ^ Bond, J. W.; Wright, Arnold (2006). Indian States: A Biographical, Historical, and Administrative Survey. New Delhi: Asian Educational Services. pp. 232–242. ISBN 978-81-206-1965-4. Archived from the original on 20 June 2024. Retrieved 14 June 2024.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa Banga, Indu (20 August 2023). Agrarian System of the Sikhs: Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Century (Reprint ed.). Manohar Publishers and Distributors. pp. 68–69, 192–193. ISBN 9789388540193.
- ^ Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 22 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 892.
- ^ Grewal, J. S. (1990). The Sikhs of the Punjab, Chapter 6: The Sikh empire (1799–1849). The New Cambridge History of India. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-63764-3. Archived from the original on 27 September 2023. Retrieved 25 October 2015.
- ^ "Khalistan: Why are some Sikhs calling for a separate homeland in India?". BBC. 1 December 2023. Retrieved 16 August 2024.
- ^ Truhart, Peter (2017). Regents of Nations: Asia, Australia-Oceania, Part 2 (Reprint ed.). Walter de Gruyter. p. 1395. ISBN 9783111616254.
- ^ a b c d e f Truhart, Peter (2017). Regents of Nations: Asia, Australia-Oceania, Part 2 (Reprint ed.). Walter de Gruyter. ISBN 9783111616254.
- ^ "Nabha | Princely State, Maharaja, Punjab | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 2024-08-17.
| This article has not been added to any content categories. Please help out by adding categories to it so that it can be listed with similar articles. (August 2024) |