User talk:Gen. Quon/Archive 1

WikiProject The Office (US) April 2008 Newsletter

The April 2008 issue of The Office WikiProject newsletter has now been published. By following the link provided, you may view the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification. Thank you. Mastrchf91 (^t/_c) 21:21, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Membership Reconfirmation

Hello there! If you're receiving this message, it means that you are currently in the Participants category of The Office WikiProject. A message involving reconfirmation was included in the current newsletter, but it was a bit buried, and I wanted to make sure that everyone received notice of this so we can get as accurate of a count as we can. The WikiProject is currently trying to find how many users listed in the Participants section are active members, and if you have a spare moment later, it would be a big help if you noted your reconfirmation by simply signing your signature here. And if you're a non-member reading this, feel free to drop by and add your name to the reconfirmation category; you'll be added into the list once it's finished. Thanks, and have a great day! Mastrchf91 (^t/_c) 21:28, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

The Amazing Jeckel Brothers

Do you know where sources can be found for the following statements? (Sugar Bear (talk) 22:47, 10 May 2010 (UTC))

Mike E. Clark also utilized standard hip hop techniques such as record scratching and sampling, "Jake Jeckel" and "Jake Jeckel" being an example of the former and "Another Love Song" being an example of the latter. The unique instrumentation of "Another Love Song" comes from the cover of Bob Dylan's song "It's All Over Now, Baby Blue" by Them (featuring Van Morrison) from their 1966 album Them Again.

The first half of the album roughly corresponds to the persona of Jake Jeckel, whereas the second part corresponds to Jack Jeckel.

• I don't think that Barnes & Noble would qualify as a reliable source, since it is a book store. (Sugar Bear (talk) 02:51, 11 May 2010 (UTC))
  • Yeah, that makes sense. What about the other?--Gen. Quon (talk) 02:53, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
    • The other was added to the article. (Sugar Bear (talk) 22:49, 11 May 2010 (UTC))

Hell's Pit

All sources, the album front cover, and the side of the jewel art, identify the album as Hell's Pit, not The Wraith: Hell's Pit, thus Hell's Pit is the intended title. (Sugar Bear (talk) 16:21, 5 June 2010 (UTC))

OK, that's cool, just wanted to make everything uniform.Gen. Quon (talk) 23:53, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:35, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jesus Freak (song)

The article Jesus Freak (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are many changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within one week and a half, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. Tbhotch^{Talk C.} 18:13, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Gen. Quon. You have new messages at Talk:Jesus Freak (song)/GA1.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tbhotch^{Talk C.} 06:25, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Jesus Freak (song)

The article Jesus Freak (song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see the talkpage for eventual comments about the article. Well done! Tbhotch^{Talk C.} 03:07, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

You have messages waiting at User talk:Tim1357

Hey Gen. Quon, just letting you know that I replied to your message on my talk page. Cheers! Tim1357 ^talk 22:39, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Hurley (album)

Nice job separating out the article. Looks much better! – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 04:31, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Hey thanks! No problem,!--Gen. Quon (talk) 17:58, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Off the Deep End

The article Off the Deep End you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Off the Deep End for things which need to be addressed. -- Cirt (talk) 04:19, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Error

Hello, i noticed you reviewed Talk:Weezer (2001 album)/GA1. Unfortunately i have added more comments and failed the article. Was this your first review? Please take a look at the review page to see all the things you unfortunately missed. The article is no where near GA status. (If you have any questions comments or concerns please reply 'here) - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 05:47, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Respond to My Error

Sorry about the butchered GA Review to "Weezer (2001 album)". I'm still learning the ways of the trade.

I've fixed the article up quite a bit. If you have time, would you take a look and tell me if I'm on the right track? Thanks!--Gen. Quon (talk) 02:16, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Dont apologize, honest makes, took me a long time to learn as well. I see you've made alot of changes. Here, focus on this article, i wrote it and it meets GA standards, but i cannnot nominate it yet because shes still releasing more singles. Animal (Kesha album). It will tell you how to write and what to write under each section without going into unnecessary details. Giving the article a once over, here are some simple things ive noticed;

1. "Chart performance" : Needs overall expansion, talk about how it did in "Australia, Canada, New Zealand,United Kingdom and the United States." Those are the main charting so talk about them, read what ive done for Animal. Also, always write numbers as six not 6.
2. "Critical reception" : could use expansion.
3. WP:LEAD needs expansion.

Overall i would hold off on doing GA reviews for a little while, it helps to write a few GA's first then to start reviewing :). - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 02:36, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Weezer (2001 album)

Hello there General. I see that you are working on Weezer after messing up the review. Now, I think that we should work together on this. Any thoughts? GamerPro64 (talk) 00:15, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Well it's always good to have more people working on the same thing. Now, do you know any other reviews for the album? I can't find anymore. GamerPro64 (talk) 00:47, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Green Album Recording Weezer.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Green Album Recording Weezer.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. dave pape (talk) 01:43, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Moved to Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 September 22#File:Green Album Recording Weezer.jpg. --dave pape (talk) 00:15, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Impotent Fury

A tag has been placed on Impotent Fury requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Codf1977 (talk) 14:14, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Showroom of Compassion for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Showroom of Compassion, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Showroom of Compassion until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 12:28, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Röyksopp

The article Röyksopp you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Röyksopp for things which need to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:22, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Great Milenko

The article The Great Milenko you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:The Great Milenko for things which need to be addressed. Adabow (talk · contribs) 21:48, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Weezer (2001 album)

Can this go to GAN again? Spiderone 22:03, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

Do you want me to do it or are you willing? Spiderone 14:27, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Another album?

So, if you don't know, Weezer (2001 album) finally passed its GAN. After it passed, it made me want to to work on Maladroit. Would it be alright if you can work on the article with me? GamerPro64 (talk) 23:45, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

That's O.K. I already got that taken care of on my Sandbox. GamerPro64 (talk) 02:06, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

Copy-editing of One Fierce Beer Coaster

Ive given the article a combing through. Just a few changes here and there. Most prominent was that you tend to cite a a soucre in multiple consequetive sentences, which is unnecessary and clutters the prose and the code - you can have several sentences in a row, or a whole paragraph, referenced with the same citation. Additionally, you use the same quote (about Madonna) twice in the article. I'd lose one of these, but I didn't remove either in case you had a preference. The first paragraph about the band's early work could also go, it's more about the band than the album and has little to no bearing on an article specifically about the album (not that it isnt of good quality, just in the wrong place). Hope I've helped you somewhat. GRAPPLE X 18:48, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of One Fierce Beer Coaster

The article One Fierce Beer Coaster you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:One Fierce Beer Coaster for things which need to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:56, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Harry and the Potters

I noticed that some months ago you had inserted dates into the above article such as 07-10-10, or dates employing slashes such as 11/21/10. Kindly note that such dates are ambiguous and otherwise do not comply with WP:MOSNUM. I have now hopefully now aligned all dates to using the same mdy format throughout. --Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 06:05, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cite Audio

Template:Cite Audio has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 05:48, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

File:MMFTJG The Prodigy.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MMFTJG The Prodigy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 11:07, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Perform This Way for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Perform This Way is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perform This Way until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 ^[talk] 01:45, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Dare to Be Stupid

The GA review has started. Please look in the talk page for concerns listed. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 08:38, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Hmm, looks like nothing came of this. If you're available to address concerns and would like a thorough review, reply here and I'll start the process. Be forewarned, however, that my reviews go beyond the GA criteria because if I'm going to take the time to scrutinize an article, I think we ought to leave it in the best shape possible. Editors who are more interested in racking up 's than in making contributions we can all be proud of usually get frustrated by this. If that's going to be a problem, you can decline my offer. (Here's an example of an in-progress GA review.) Two Hearted River (paddle / fish) 13:25, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Note: That's not to suggest that, in the end, I go beyond the GA criteria when deciding whether to pass the article. :) Two Hearted River (paddle / fish) 17:56, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

I have begun to review this article. See Talk:Dare to Be Stupid/GA1 for the in-progress review. All the best, – Quadell ^(talk) 18:45, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chameleon Circuit (band)

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A tag has been placed on Chameleon Circuit (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you can assert the notability of the subject, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 01:00, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Dare to Be Stupid

The article Dare to Be Stupid you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Dare to Be Stupid for things which need to be addressed. – Quadell ^(talk) 19:50, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Munky River

The article Munky River has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No secondary sources found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 23:14, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Good Article promotion

	Congratulations!
	Congratulations! Dare to Be Stupid is now a certified "Good Article"! Your efforts are much appreciated, and it was a pleasure working with you. In the spirit of celebration, you may wish to review one of the Good Article nominees that someone else nominated, as there is currently a backlog, and any help is appreciated. All the best, – Quadell (talk)

Nomination of Chameleon Circuit (band) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chameleon Circuit (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chameleon Circuit (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 00:00, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

September 2011

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. bodnotbod (talk) 09:52, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Gen. Quon. You have new messages at Talk:"Weird Al" Yankovic in 3-D/GA1.
Message added 02:39, 27 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— Status {^talk_contribs  02:39, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

I began the review. And oddly enough, I have like no more work for the rest of the week, so I'll do some more of the review tonight. :) — Status {^talk_contribs  19:48, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Awesome! I'll work on it as you go through it.--Gen. Quon (talk) 21:24, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

New messages. — Status {^talk_contribs  02:11, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Stars (Hum song)

Thanks! Making this article was a long-time low priority for me. I'm glad that you had the wherewithal. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:55, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

No problem! I've been wanting to do it as well. It's a great song and it needed a page.--Gen. Quon (talk) 18:21, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

X-Files

I see you're editing some X-Files articles - including one I turned into a GA. It's that sporadic, or are you willing to join the XF project to show we can count with your help? igordebraga ≠ 16:57, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm similar to you - currently watching season 2, and editing as well. And season 1 is done - is only not in the GTC yet because I decided to wait for the primary contributor to do so, and he's lazy... igordebraga ≠ 18:01, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Just as I said that to you... Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/The X-Files (season 1)/archive1 igordebraga ≠ 18:53, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Can you take a look at 3 (The X-Files) at least to clean up the prose? (I'm afraid of failing this...) Thanks. igordebraga ≠ 14:30, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Discussion at WP:TXF

An older discussion at WP:TXF concerning the presentation of "mytharc" episodes in the season articles has been resumed here. As a member of the project who is still active (hens' teeth!), your opinion on the matter would be hugely appreciated. Thanks! GRAPPLE X 03:11, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Unnatural (The X-Files)

The article The Unnatural (The X-Files) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:The Unnatural (The X-Files) for things which need to be addressed. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 19:28, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

New GA!

	Congratulations!
	The article The Unnatural (The X-Files) you nominated for GA status has passed. Well done! Please continue to make quality contributions to Wikipedia. Puffin Let's talk! 20:42, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Jose Chung's From Outer Space GA nomination.

Your GA nomination of Jose Chung's From Outer Space has been reviewed and put on hold; please see Talk:Jose Chung's From Outer Space/GA1. Glimmer721 ^talk 23:24, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Clyde Bruckman's Final Repose/GA1

Hi, I have reviewed Clyde Bruckman's Finale Repose and placed the review on hold. Comments for improvement can be found at the review page I linked in header. Thanks. -- Matthew RD 03:55, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

GA review of Even Worse

Hi,

I have review the article you nominated at Talk:Even Worse/GA1. It is a wonderful article. Only one thing is holding up its GA: one of the references is inadequate. Shouldn't be a problem to fix. (Loved the song samples!) Best wishes, MathewTownsend (talk) 01:07, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

I still don't get what "themed all but one of its parodies" means. What does it mean? MathewTownsend (talk) 22:40, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Would you still like to have Even Worse copyedited...

considering that it has since passed its GAN? Bobnorwal (talk) 02:18, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

X-Files mythology episodes

Hey, Gen Quon. Great work on the WP:TXF project so far! Making good progress with the episode GAs. I was just wondering if you could leave working on the season 2 and 3 mythology episodes for a while, though, if you're still working on those seasons - I'd really like to start tackling them next week, as I plan on working on a few X-Files good topics for Wikipedia:WikiCup. My first port of call was to be the first set of mytharc eps. If you'd rather you worked on them now then I can work on something else, though, so it's alright if you don't want to leave them. Thanks. GRAPPLE X 16:56, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Good job getting some more articles started! "Drive" is definitely a favourite ep of mine, Cranston's probably the best guest villain I've seen. You should definitely keep an eye for getting new articles up on Template:Did you know, it'd be good for you to get some credit for the work and to get some more attention for the project. GRAPPLE X 19:23, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

X-Files at DYK

I've gone ahead and nominated two of your X-Files articles for Did You Know (Drive and Monday). You've been credited as the author so you'll get the credit for the work, but this way you'll not have to worry about the hassle of nominating them. The nominations pages are here and here if you want to look them over. I'll keep an eye out to see what fixes, if any, are needed. Good work on the article creation and expansion! GRAPPLE X 06:45, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Oh cool, thanks! I was trying to figure out how to nominate, and it confused me slightly, so I'll work on that. ;)--Gen. Quon (talk) 15:34, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Spotted that you'd created Template:Did you know nominations/Field Trip and added it to that article's talk page. The nominations should go on T:TDYK; although this one isn't going to qualify, I'm afraid. The article either needs to be newly created (from a redirect or from scratch), or be a former Stub-class article which has been expanded to be 5 times the size it was before—Field Trip has been Start-class for a while, and the expansion hasn't been enough. The best way to go about getting articles ready for DYK is to find those which haven't been created yet, or better yet, use Category:Stub-Class The X-Files articles to find an article which can be expanded to five times its current length. The latter option usually works as a great start to getting an article ready for GA status as it encourages expansion, gives you a chance to get a small review done on it, and the extra views from DYK help iron out any extra problems someone else might catch. Let me know if you have any more issues with it. GRAPPLE X 22:45, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

• I was wondering why you reverted my changes to the date formats. It just seems strange that the article itself uses mdy and some dates in the reference section are in dmy, so I put them back. I don't mean to tread on your toes. I don't mind which way they go, but they need to be consistent. Let me know if you want them all to be dmy, and I'll run the script over the article. --Ohconfucius ^¡digame! 05:56, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Your GOCE request

Hi. I'm just checking the status of outstanding GOCE requests, and I see that Even Worse is now GA. Do you still want a copy edit of it, or may I delete the request? Regards, --Stfg (talk) 17:35, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Drive (The X-Files)

Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Smallville

It comes out to about 4 million, which given that both are estimates it's not that far off. Feel free to update Tempest (Smallville) with the newer figure, as well as the percentage in drop off from the pilot. I'm at work right now and cannot take care of it at the moment.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 17:38, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Monday (The X-Files)

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:04, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Leonard Betts

The article Leonard Betts you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Leonard Betts for things which need to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:15, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Moving Good Article nominations

Hi Gen Quon. If you want to move your GA nominations around it has to be done at the nominated articles talk page. The bot uses the information there to decide where to put the article on the WP:GAN page (it has reverted your manual edit here). Just change the subtopic field in the template at the top of the nominated articles talk page to Episodes and the bot will do the rest. AIRcorn (talk) 21:54, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

OK, cool! Thanks for the heads up and sorry if it caused any confusion.--Gen. Quon (talk) 22:10, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Good Article Barnstar
		Thanks Gen. Quon for helping to promote Leonard Betts to Good Article status. Please accept this little sign of appreciation and goodwill from me, because you deserve it. Keep it up, and give someone a pat on the back today. --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 23:22, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Dreamland (The X-Files): GOCE request

Hi. Am I right in thinking that you were only seeking a c/e of the Plot section, and that your request can be archived since Baffle gab1978 has done that? Cheers, --Stfg (talk) 11:47, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Ping! --Stfg (talk) 16:17, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

The Office

I just wanted to say good job on your work on The Office articles "The Return", "Hot Girl" and "Pool Party". NoD'ohnuts (talk) 17:44, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Hey, thanks! I joined The Office task-force awhile ago but never really did anything, so I figure now is the time to start!--Gen. Quon (talk) 17:48, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Well it's always nice to get more help. NoD'ohnuts (talk) 18:06, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

I also have a suggestion that we take turns on episodes for it. That way we don't have two people working on one episode, and also less work for both of us NoD'ohnuts (talk) 18:22, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Good point. I noticed that we were both hammering away at the "Jury Duty" page for a bit. Sorry about that. ;)--Gen. Quon (talk) 18:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Yea haha. This way we don't have to go through that and all the edit conflicts. So do you want to start on the "Special Project" and then will take turns with the rest of the season, or would you rather that I start with SP NoD'ohnuts (talk) 19:20, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Honestly, whatever works. If you'd like to go ahead and do it, I'll focus on revamping some of the older episode's articles, starting with season one's "Basketball" and "The Alliance."--Gen. Quon (talk) 20:12, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Cool, I'll start with Special Project. Good luck on "The Alliance" and "Basketball" NoD'ohnuts (talk) 17:21, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

GA Review of Home (The X-Files)

Hi! I have finished my review of the article, and put it on hold for some concerns to be addressed. Good luck! I would also like to acknowledge your outstanding dedication to X-Files episodes! I am impressed. Basilisk4u (talk) 22:39, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Awesome! I will get to work. And thanks for the compliment! I really love the show and I have a lot of the books so I felt I may as well help to make the pages look nice! Cheers.--Gen. Quon (talk) 23:28, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Good Article Barnstar
		Thanks Gen. Quon for helping to promote Home (The X-Files) to Good Article status. Please accept this little sign of appreciation and goodwill from me, because you deserve it. Keep it up, and give someone a pat on the back today. --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 06:50, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

X-Files

hello,

sorry for the long delay. I was obsessed with music in the past time, plus I was busy. I will finish the reviews in the next days. I already read them shortly after creating the GAN subpage, but I was unable to find any real issues, so I can say in advance that your articles have good potential to pass the nomination procedure. Regards.--♫GoP♫_T^C_N 15:31, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Biogenesis (The X-Files)

The article Biogenesis (The X-Files) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Biogenesis (The X-Files) for comments about the article. Well done! There is a backlog of articles waiting for review, why not help out and review a nominated article yourself? ♫GoP♫_T^C_N 16:34, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

RFC

Could you comment at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Television#Reformating_Emmy_Awards_episodic_Directing_and_Writing_templates.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:31, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Sixth Extinction II: Amor Fati

The article The Sixth Extinction II: Amor Fati you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:The Sixth Extinction II: Amor Fati for things which need to be addressed. ♫GoP♫_T^C_N 13:45, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

I passes it. Congrats! :)--♫GoP♫_T^C_N 12:06, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Fire and Blood (Game of Thrones)/GA2

Thanks for your clear and actionable improvement suggestions. I've addressed the vast majority of them, but have a couple of questions I've articulated in the review page (e.g. is the production section sufficient as expanded? Do you want non-RS (primary or IMDB) citations for the guest stars vs. none at all?) that could use your input. Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 02:36, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

White Collar GA reviews

Thanks for reviewing (and passing) those White Collar articles! I really appreciate it. Kevinbrogers (talk) 21:45, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

No problem! Really good stuff, might I add. :) Cheers!--Gen. Quon (talk) 21:45, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Roadrunners

One of season eight's best, I thought. Had this bookmarked for when we got round to it, might be useful to you. From the time of first broadcast, which is always useful. Al

FYI

Did you see this yet? Glimmer721 ^talk 20:18, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

I very nearly added a new section to give you the same link. There's some nice stuff there that puts the episode's broadcast in the wider context of the series' overall changing reception. GRAPPLE X 03:22, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Excellent, these last few articles have been really interesting to read. Adding the info, although it is sad, as we're now entering the era of the series' downfall, and I find myself agreeing with the reviews. Although I love season 6 and 7, I feel it was the natural end for the show. Then they had to made that durned season 8, and that accursed season 9... Sigh. I'll stop now.--Gen. Quon (talk) 04:32, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Was browsing The X-Files and was wondering why Nicolas Lea is listed under "Starring" in the infobox. Was Krycek ever a starring character? Glimmer721 ^talk 15:23, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Oh, good catch! Yeah, he never was, at least as far as I know. I removed him, along with William B Davis, as they were always credited as guest starring. I'd chalk them up as recurring characters.--Gen. Quon (talk) 15:48, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Ok. I'm working on the summary for "The Field Where I Died", which is kind of hard with all the past-life stuff. When Mulder is recounting the life where he is a Polish woman, do I refer to him as "her"? It's confusing. Glimmer721 ^talk 16:13, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Oh boy, that is tough. I'd stick with he, since its never made clear whether or not his past life is true. For instance, he mentions that The Smoking Man is a Nazi, but according to, I think "Apocrypha", he was alive during that time. I don't really know.--Gen. Quon (talk) 16:16, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, it just sounds kind of funny, with Melissa being "his husband" and everything. Glimmer721 ^talk 16:20, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Just give it a whirl and see what you come out with.--Gen. Quon (talk) 16:23, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Done! Might need some editing, but it's better than what was there peviously. Now, on to "Sanguinarium". Oh, that was a terrible episode. Glimmer721 ^talk 16:39, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Excellent! I'll try not to mess with them at all so that when you're done, maybe I can GA review them.--Gen. Quon (talk) 16:43, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

All right. Do you have the season 4 guide? Glimmer721 ^talk 17:11, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Yes I do. Do you need some scans?--Gen. Quon (talk) 17:17, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Sure, anything of production and reception for "Teliko", "Field", and "Sanguinarium". Also, I'm going to be on wikibreak for about three weeks from June 27th, so you may have to take care of "The Walk" or "Oubliette" for me if they are reviewed during that time. Glimmer721 ^talk 21:13, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Sure, I'll try to get the scans over this week. As for the other articles, if they get reviewed then, I'll take care of them.--Gen. Quon (talk) 04:32, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

"Oubliette" was just reviewed; could you check on the page number issue? The files you sent me have expired. Glimmer721 ^talk 16:16, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Actually, you might want to wait on the scans, as I'll be on wikibreak soon and they expire after so long. Glimmer721 ^talk 21:04, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

OK, just drop a message off here when you're ready for 'em!--Gen. Quon (talk) 21:10, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

The X-Files Mythology, Volume 3 – Colonization

Great expansion! You should nominate it at DYK, if you haven't already. :) Ruby 2010/2013 06:10, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

I was going to nom it to save you the hassle, if you're still unsure of the workings over there. If you want me to sort it out just pick an interesting bit from the article and I'll do the rest. GRAPPLE X 14:23, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

If you'd like to, that'd be great; I think that's more your forte anyway. :) Maybe you could use the quote with: "The whole story line of the Syndicate and the bees and the aliens and the chips in the neck, they all seemed to just accidentally fall into place and create an intriguing, mysterious storyline that eventually got so mysterious and so intriguing that Chris had to blow it up, because he couldn't deal with it anymore."--Gen. Quon (talk) 14:41, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Hmm. "... that The X-Files Mythology, Volume 3 – Colonization had become so intriguing, series creator Chris Carter "had to blow it up, because he couldn't deal with it anymore"? I'll stick a nom together for you now. GRAPPLE X 14:52, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

That sounds good! If that doesn't work, I'll think of something else.--Gen. Quon (talk) 17:10, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Hey, do you mind if I edit User:Gen. Quon/The Office Prep upon nominating episodes? Good idea putting all of the seasons in one place. Ruby 2010/2013 16:25, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Go ahead! I moved it from The Office project page (since I guess that's going down) for anyone interested to use. Basically, I stole Grapple's prep idea. ;) --Gen. Quon (talk) 17:10, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

I don't know if it's the GAN drive or just sheer luck but Jesus we've got a fair heft of GTCs going on; five active at the minute with a few more being really close to being ready. You're a fucking machine. GRAPPLE X

Haha, the other day, I logged on and saw half the GAs were being reviewed. I guess having a 20+ backlog wasn't too bad now that they're cleared out! I have no clue where to go next. I think I'll work a bit on various stand-alones, and maybe season 9. Also, totally off-topic, but I've always though the picture for Dana Scully was not what it should be. Would anyone object if I switched it to this? I know it isn't free, but it was just the first image I found. I also think it matches with the Mulder article better.--Gen. Quon (talk) 00:48, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

I'm not sure, to be honest. If the uploader there owns the photo maybe you could fire them a message asking for permission to use it in the article? Otherwise maybe a screencap would be easier to justify. But yeah the current picture is a bit too glamorous to convey hard-nosed straight-woman Scully, to me. If you're stuck for working on something, maybe we could divide up the remaining character articles and try to get that sorted, or summarise the already-GA ones in the list article to get that up to FL? GRAPPLE X 00:54, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

I'll do that and message them. I don't think they own the rights, but I can always say its a screencap from the show. As for the characters, I can help with that too. I'll probably do a smattering of both (characters and episodes). I feel the Mulder and Scully pages need some love too.--Gen. Quon (talk) 00:56, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

If you get a chance, could you have a look at 2Shy? An editor insists on bloating out the plot section to huge length and I've reverted quite a few times already; I've already explained that it's too much detail and provided a link to the relevant guideline. GRAPPLE X 06:12, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

I just did. At least the's not adding "Mulder is an alien" or the like.--Gen. Quon (talk) 14:58, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

No, I'm not planning on working on "The List", so you can finish it off if you want. I'm planning on incorporating this into "Pusher" and Season 3. I still have that research in my sandbox for Scully if you have any idea how to incorporate it (I sort of like the idea of making a "Characterization" section like this, and moving that and "Relationships" out of the plot section). Also I think the first few sentences of the lead need to be rewritten to better explain it. I was also browsing A.V. Club reviews and thought Scully's reception section could be expanded with the complaints about her unrealistically not accepting the aliens in mythology episodes (notably here, and I remember Entertainment Weekly complaining about it a few times for season 3), and Mulder is also frequently being described as a dick. Glimmer721 ^talk 17:44, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Also I came across this - is it mentioned in any production material? Glimmer721 ^talk 19:56, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

I think that actually has come up in one of those "Behind the Truth" segments included in the DVD boxes of the first five seasons (those things are brilliant and they should have done more of them). There's a couple that are basically just looking at Anderson and Duchovny goofing around on set, might be in one of those. GRAPPLE X 20:02, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

OK, I'll mess with "The List". That whole section looks good for "Pusher". Are you interested in "Kitesnguagiai" or whatever that fifth season episode is about Pusher too? As for the Scully box, I laughed a bit reading that! I agree about the character articles; they need to be cleaned up.--Gen. Quon (talk) 20:27, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

I thought the box thing was funny until I remembered I'm about the same height. Anyway, I haven't seen "Kitsunegari" yet (I haven't seen past "Tunguska", actually; I stopped renting the DVDs from the library when I realized I blew through season 3 in a month, though I'm planning to continue at a slower rate later). It might be helpful if we make a sandbox for the characters and mess with the it there. Glimmer721 ^talk 22:38, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Since "Squeeze" was promoted I'm not using User:Grapple X/Squeeze pics, feel free to use it as a sandbox. GRAPPLE X 23:22, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

I hijacked the Squeeze Pics link and went to town on Scully. Although it now needs expansion, I think the article looks quite a bit better, especially after the addition of Glimmer's bits. I'll try to work on it some more in the next few days.--Gen. Quon (talk) 03:40, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Good start! I'm thinking Doggett, Reyes, and Skinner may be able to be lumped into one section, like "Professional relationships" or "Other colleagues". Also, there have to be other academic analysis out there besides the Philosophy book...think I saw something on feminism on Google Books once, though I'm not sure how much was avaliable. Glimmer721 ^talk 17:10, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Question: in Scully's article-draft it says, "However, because of Scully's skeptisism, she believes she was kidnapped by men and subjected to tests, not aliens." But wasn't this sort of confirmed in "731" with the First Elder, which was the reason she believed it in the first place? Glimmer721 ^talk 00:13, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

He told her that was the case, but that doesn't necessarily make it so. I think it's still relatively open-ended but it seems to make more sense that it was aliens given the whole implant thing. GRAPPLE X 00:16, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, I like that better. I'm still not too sure what the hell happened. :P--Gen. Quon (Talk) 00:17, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

He could've been lying for all we know. Darn conspiracies. Glimmer721 ^talk 00:21, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

This is totally off-topic, but I just realized we only have about 40 more episodes to go for GA before we've promoted ALL of them. Dang.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 00:24, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, I noticed we were getting near 200. I'd say this time next year we could conceivably be in all-promoted territory for the whole project. I think getting the list stuff to FL is going to be the only slow going. That and maybe the really stubby stuff like the music and merchandise. GRAPPLE X 00:27, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Also noticed only a mere five episodes don't have articles yet. FIVE. That's pretty darn awesome. And looking back six months ago, we've seriously made some progress.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 00:32, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

List of The X-Files episodes isn't really that bad; the lead just needs to be cleaned up. The bulleted distinction is really unnecessary, as it's all explained in the first paragraph. Glimmer721 ^talk 01:04, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

I think the references need to be clean up a bit too. There's about three different Meisler books that are cited.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 01:05, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

The main issue there is compliance with MOS:DTT, List of Friends episodes sparked a furore on how to handle these things and the current transclusion method of compiling episode lists has been ruled as not meeting FL standards; it'll take more work than it looks because tables will have to be built to accommodate row and column scopes for screen-readers. If a format is found that works it's just a matter of grunt work to apply it to all the seasons but I'm not sure what would work. GRAPPLE X 01:08, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

I'm sure if we put our minds to the task, we can get it done.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 01:10, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

I saw the Friends issue, though I didn't quite understand it. I do know that someone went around to every "List of..." and inserted something like "plainrowheaders", though I'm not sure that solved the whole problem. Glimmer721 ^talk 01:30, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

I think if we remove the plot summaries (not really needed since by then we'll have full episode articles hopefully) that'll give us one row per episode; if we move the columns so the episode title is the first one, not the number, and add "scope=row" to that cell, we'll have us our MOS:DTT table. Having it all in one large table with some indication of season (beyond a season field) like cell shading in the title cell would also be a good idea; that would allow the full list of episodes to be sortable across all columns. On another note; I'm looking at The Post-Modern Prometheus and Deep Throat (The X-Files episode) for possible A-Class candidates; I can't sign off on the latter as I'm the author, but I just need one more say from someone (probably Glimmer) to let Prometheus get the boost. GRAPPLE X 23:28, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, go ahead on those two. Is the pilot on the agenda? I think I have a little bit to add to the reception section (the Tor.com review complained about the bug bite scene, so I think we could integrate the cast and crew's comments on it into that as well). Also, List of The X-Files episodes only uses the episode summaries for the movies, right? Glimmer721 ^talk 17:20, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

"Deep Throat" looks really good, so I'd vote a yay on A-class for it. As for the pilot, I think it can be beefed up as well. We could probably get it to FA as well. I think we can also get "Deep Throat" and "Tooms" to FA, eventually. (On a personal note, I'd like to get "Prometheus", "The Unnatural", "Jose Chungs'" and "Clyde Bruckman's" up to FA one of these days. Maybe even "all things".)--Gen. Quon (Talk) 17:29, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Check out the Philosophy of The X-Files book on Google Books; there are whole chapters on "Jose Chung's" and "Clyde Bruckman's". Useful for themes. Glimmer721 ^talk 17:56, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

We're definitely on course for completing an all-episode GT shortly so working on some further featured content would be a good idea. After we've honed up on some of our personal projects it might be a good idea to vote on a collaboration every so often, pool together to expand it, and between the three of us at least we should be able to get it in good enough shape have something to go with. If you're both keen on "Deep Throat" I'll up it, same with "Post-Modern Prometheus". An FA for "Pilot" would be useful but it might be tricky to get the comprehensive requirements met, it's hard to say how much of the series' overall impact should be mentioned there compared to the article The X-Files or even The X-Files (season 1). I think both The Simpsons and Homicide: Life on the Streets might have FA-class pilots, possibly Smallville too. Worth looking into it to see how they went about it. GRAPPLE X 17:38, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

I know Smallville does, but it's not much bigger than ours, at least as far as I remember!--Gen. Quon (Talk)

Award

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	For reviewing 5 of my GA nominations. 4 that passed and 1 that hasn't. Thank you. Good job with your The X-Files and The Office work. TBrandley 16:05, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Hey thanks! Good luck with your Awake series too. :)--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:23, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

The Office, Season 8

I was just wondering wether we should nominate the season 8 article as a Featured List or a Good article. Either way, I currently believe it's ready to be nominated for either one. NoD'ohnuts (talk) 12:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

I think Good article is the way to go now. It'd probably need some work for it to become a Featured List.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 14:13, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

OK, I'll nominate it right now NoD'ohnuts (talk) 08:38, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Sounds good. I'll help you repair any GAN issues. I think if we can get the rest of the season 8 articles up to GA, we could nominate the whole shebang for a Good Topic.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 14:44, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

I have reviewed the Season 8 article. TBrandley 23:57, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

I fixed some of it up. Also, if you're interested, you can edit this page as projects and articles are promoted.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 00:29, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

X Files and Buffy

Here's the mail! [1] Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 19:13, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Eddy (Ed, Edd n Eddy)/1

Hello. I'm afraid I have nominated Eddy (Ed, Edd n Eddy) for reassessment, as I do not believe that the article currently meets the good article criteria. Please see the discussion here. J Milburn (talk) 22:45, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

FYI: Sorry this was briefly deleted; your talk page is on my watchlist and I accidently clicked "rollback". Glimmer721 ^talk 23:14, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Haha, no problem!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 23:14, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

DYK for The X-Files Mythology, Volume 3 – Colonization

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Lord of the Flies

I may need help for my new X-Files episode article "Lord of the Flies (The X-Files)", since I never watch the series, and have never read any book sources, I don't know much about any of it. I just feel like helping on the Season 9 articles, currently. I would appreciate it. Have a nice day. TBrandley 00:55, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

I'll try to get some of the viewership numbers and the like. I've been planning on working on season 9 for awhile, so this help is appreciated.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:23, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

The X-Files GA Review

The X-Files has been GA reviewed! Please see it here. --TBrandley 00:29, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Just to let you know it's been a week since the review was put on hold, and there is still considerable work needing to be done. Reckon you have the time to pitch in and make changes or think it should be withdrawn? – Lemonade51 (talk) 16:16, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

I have gotten to fixed most minor issues at this time. I've asked for a few more days. TBrandley 16:19, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

I'll be honest, I haven't the time this week to mess with it, and I have other projects that I'm currently working on ("Triangle", The Office articles, upping a few more episodes to GA, etc.) I think Grapple's in the same situation. I'm not sure if I can help fix some of the larger problems. As for withdrawing, I'll be honest: the article should've never been nominated in the first place, as it was not anywhere near ready. That being said, I really appreciate your comments and additions, Lemonade51, as they will be invaluable when the project turns our full attention towards the article.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 16:58, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

No problem, have failed the article, given next to nothing was being correct. I don't even know why it was nominated in the first place. Lemonade51 (talk) 21:09, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

FLCR

I was wondering if you could vote at the featured list candidate for List of Awake episodes. Thanks, TBrandley 13:55, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Portal

I finally decided it was time to start playing with portals. Thankfully the experience seemed GLADOS-free, and I've now finished P:MM. I'm going to stick it up for peer review at WP:PPREV soon but I figured I'd ask what you thought of it first. There's still work for me to do on it but I've done enough that it'll sit comfortably for the time being. Purge the page a few times (there's a link under the first box to do just that) and let me know what you think; one for The X-Files is also a possibility and it'd look a lot better as there's so much more stuff to work with for it. GRAPPLE X 02:06, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Nice! I think that looks really good. Did a few cycles and didn't see any hiccups. I'd support it, and an X-Files one would be grand.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 02:08, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

The repeated use of some of the images doesn't seem like a bad thing? There's only so many ouroboros icons on commons, though I might actually try creating a few more myself. GRAPPLE X 02:10, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

I didn't notice it. I don't think it's that stand-out-ish. I guess a few more could be made. Also, do you want to add "Millennium" to the GA section? I realize its really only connected in name only, but I guess its still part of the universe.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 04:11, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Totally overlooked that, thanks. I'll add it to the selected articles as well. GRAPPLE X 04:13, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Unproduced TXF eps

I was converting some of the refs to {{sfn}}, but I'm not sure which Meisler book is which for those I haven't done yet. I assume the season 5 stuff is out of vol 4, and the season 6 stuff from vol 5? GRAPPLE X 22:41, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Oh yeah, it is. That was a dumb mistake on my part.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 22:41, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Sorted it out now. Cheers. There's some good stuff there, coming together nicely. Do you think it's GA or FL territory? It's a list but it's all in prose so it could go either way when we get it done. GRAPPLE X 22:52, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Hmm, I think it looks pretty good. Maybe GA. I assume we might need to add some pictures and fix the lead.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 04:13, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

The article has now been made: Here.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 18:29, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

X-Files images

I have found a collection of images on "The Calusari", an X-Files episode. Do you think any of images here can help the article. TBrandley 16:15, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

It all depends on whether they are commented upon by critics or talked about in the production section. Since neither have been fleshed out, it's hard to say.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 16:40, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Smallville

I own all of the companions (real life keeps me from finishing the season pages), but as far as "episodes" go there arare notable enough to have their own article. The biggest hang-up is always finding actually "professional" reviews for the episodes. Most get reviewed by random bloggers, or low-end websites that would ultimately not stand up to scrutiny in any review. So, first thing that needs to be done is finding reliable third-party source. After that, it would be a synch to get production info on any episodes that are notable.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 19:11, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:3 Is The Magic Number Single.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:3 Is The Magic Number Single.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:03, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

DYK for List of unmade episodes of The X-Files

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:03, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Gen. Quon. You have new messages at Talk:The Little Guy/GA2.
Message added 05:13, 16 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TRLIJC19 (talk) 05:13, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

X-Files, Season 2

The X-Files Season 2 has not passed as there are still more serious issues to be addressed at the GAN page, per WT:GAN. Sorry for your troubles. TBrandley 14:59, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. I've gotten the issues straightened out.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 16:01, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Since there seems to be support at WT:GAN for your articles being okay after all, do you want me to go over them or are you happy enough? GRAPPLE X 22:20, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

I'm fine. If you want to double check just for funsies, but I'm not really that worried. Thank you for offering, though.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 22:23, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

I might end up grabbing one or two as a spotcheck, just so that it's done for posterity. Any in particular you want another set of eyes on? GRAPPLE X 22:26, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Maybe "Chinga" or "Never Again". Those were a few of the bigger ones.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 22:39, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

"William"

More issues have been listed at GAN page. After this is done, it could be nominated for A-Class. Of course after the original copy-edit for GA. Good luck! TBrandley 00:41, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

I think I already got those, at least, if its the prose line-by-line that Malleus Fatuorum gave you're referring to. Thanks for intense review, the harsher they are, the better the articles turn out.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 02:11, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

The Office New GA Nomination

I see that you have took on the review for Diwali (The Office). But on the top it says my user name. I think we both created the review around the same time. If you'd prefer to take on the review, you can do it rather than me. I can do it if you don't want to. Its up to you. Thanks! TBrandley 04:18, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Comment: The GA review page was created by TBrandley, so technically the article is his to review. TRLIJC19 (talk) 04:27, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Regardless, I still leave it up to him. TBrandley 04:30, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

I understand; I was just making note that if it was controversial, it would go to you. TRLIJC19 (talk) 04:42, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Oh, whoops. We must've created it at the same time. I really don't care who reviews it. I've just reviewed a bunch of the others, so I thought I may as well.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 15:31, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Carter

Do the Hurwitz/Knowles, Gradnitzer/Pittson or Kessenich books have much in the way of biographical information on Chris Carter? I'm working on a draft of his article now and it's looking like it could be a pretty solid one (I'm pushing 1000 words and I haven't covered Millennium, either TXF film, or his awards yet). If there's anything good in those sources I'd really appreciate you firing some over when you have some time. GRAPPLE X 22:58, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

I believe the Hurwitz/Knowles and Gradnitzer/Pittson ones do. I think the Kessenich one just talks about how much he ruined the franchise. I'll try to find them and get them over to you.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 22:59, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks man. This is what I have so far. GRAPPLE X 23:06, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

My new version's now live at Chris Carter (screenwriter). I really should try to find more stuff from the pre- and post- X-Files years but I think it's a damn sight better that what I thought I could put together. GRAPPLE X 01:58, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

That looks a lot better than it did! Good job!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 02:11, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

This is pretty cool. I'm already working on some of the season 1 eps again for A class and better so seeing "Ice" in there definitely helps, and some of those other ones will also benefit. GRAPPLE X 16:17, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Sweet find! I don't know about you, but I really loved "Vienen" (I think, because it harkened back to the season three/four days of the mythology), so it's awesome to see that in there. I'll try to add some of those to articles.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 17:04, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Hey I'm back, with a big to-do list. Do either of you mind emailing scans for "Teliko" and/or "The Field Where I Died"? I still have to write that plot summary for "Sanguinarium"... Glimmer721 ^talk 01:04, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

I can probably do that tomorrow. I'll also send the Season Three Cinefantastique articles and the Hurwtiz n' Knowles scans.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 01:17, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! But don't you mean Season Four? Glimmer721 ^talk 14:23, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I do. I was being stupid. Sorry about that.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 14:39, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Haha I figured that was what you meant. By the way, we just got Netflix so I should be able to continue soon at a nice, slow pace :) Glimmer721 ^talk 16:49, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, my scanner pooped out today. I will have them tomorrow for sure. Also, are you planning on working on "Pusher", or was I dreaming that?--Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:19, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

That's fine. And you were dreaming, though I understand why you would think that. I just added some reception after I finished watching the episode. Glimmer721 ^talk 16:20, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

OK, I think I'll work on that. BTW, you've got mail.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 16:31, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Got them, but what are the page numbers? They aren't visible on any of them. 01:39, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Whoops! My bad. For Teliko, its 56 and 57. For The Field Where I Died, its 63, 64, and 65. And for Sanguinarium, its 72 and 73.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 01:43, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Okay, thanks! Will start on "Teliko" soon. Glimmer721 ^talk 15:01, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Question: when the "Teliko" page talks about the actor having his hair dyed orange "the better to switch it back and forth from black to white", this is because of computer-generated effects, right? Glimmer721 ^talk 16:52, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

I think so, I don't have the source handy, though, so I'll have to check it later.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 16:58, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Okay. BTW, several GTCs have been "closed with concensus to promote" over at WP:GTC. Glimmer721 ^talk 19:57, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

GAN

Sorry to bother you. But, I was wondering if you could possibly GA review "The Little Guy". Don't feel like you have to. Thanks! Since you last saw, new mistakes have been fixed. Thanks for you time. TBrandley 03:21, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Sure I can do that. I'll give it a look tomorrow.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:22, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

The X-Files infobox image

Hey Gen. Quon, you recently changed the infobox image for The X-Files to a self-created transparent logo, any chance you'd be inclined to change it back to the image from the opening credit sequence, just because that image is so iconic and better represents the show. That new image could be placed on the List of The X-Files episodes page. That's kinda common for TV show pages, where the opening credits image is used for the main article, and a transparent logo version is used for the list of episodes page. Anyway, just a thought. Thanks. Drovethrughosts (talk) 23:55, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

I don't really care. I switched it back. I just thought a free image was better than a non-free one.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 00:09, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:DwightRandall.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:DwightRandall.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:19, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Re: GTs

In short, a complete lack of wiki-time put GTs on the backburner. Helping run the Good Article drive cost me what little time I had, and since I'm apparently the only delegate again the topics fell by the wayside. I'll catch up best I can but it might be perpetually backlogged for a while. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 18:03, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	This is for of all of the articles you have promoted to good article status. 155 is an astonishing number, and you should be recognized for your fine contributions to the Wikipedia community! TRLIJC19 (talk) 19:33, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Hey! Thank you very much!! :)--Gen. Quon (Talk) 20:31, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Season 8 Review

Came across this review of season 8. Check out the tag to see if there is anything else of use. Glimmer721 ^talk 18:28, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Awesome! Nice catch. Added. That site looks like it has quite a few goodies.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 18:57, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, I use it a lot for Doctor Who. It is a pain clicking through all the pages for the lists, but worth it. Anyway, I just watched "Leonard Betts", which was really fun...until those last 5 minutes or so :( Glimmer721 ^talk 20:54, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Oh yeah, I like that episode a lot! It's one of my favorites, and I think it represents one of the last "LOL, I'm a monster and eat people" episodes, sadly. But yeah, the ending is super sad. Right after the Superbowl.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 21:17, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

"Memento Mori" was incredibly sad. I've added the Meisler info to "Teliko" and "The Field Where I Died". BTW, do you have a reference to what an IP recently added to the "Broadcast and reception" section of "Unruhe"? Glimmer721 ^talk 17:19, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

I highly doubt there is one to be found. GRAPPLE X 17:21, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, I removed it. I did an IP address trace it it yielded a hit from Traverse City, Michigan. I think it was just added by an angry viewer.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 17:47, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Now that I look at that more closely, it borders on vandalism. Anyway, did you see this yet? Glimmer721 ^talk 19:55, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

I'll try to add that. I really agree with The AV Club's reviews. I love season 6, and I'm glad they aren't too harsh.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 13:33, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Don't know what I should name the header :)

Hi! I'm going to get your The X-Files articles GA reviewed by today. Also, I was wondering if you could leave comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Awake (TV series)/archive1. But you don't have to. Thanks! TBrandley 15:58, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! I'll take a look and see what I can leave.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 22:39, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Request for PR

Hello Gen. Quon, as a regular wikipedia contributor please help in thisPR with your valuable suggestions.Thank You.--Ayanosh (talk) 18:57, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Gen. Quon. You have new messages at Talk:Soft Light (The X-Files)/GA1.
Message added 19:42, 30 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TBrandley 19:42, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Season 2 Good Topic

Just dropped by to let you know all season 2 articles for The X-Files are at GA now. Another GTC. Congrats! TBrandley 23:23, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the heads up and thanks for the reviews!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 00:19, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Good to see you finished. I even sought versions of Lawrey's books to help out with the articles that were missing (also got Meisler's first - it only hasn't arrived yet - and am getting the second), so maybe I'll help you close the following topic by improving The X-Files (season 3), and the severely lacking ones of Season 4 and 5 later. (and yet I still have to finish watching Season 9...) igordebraga ≠ 04:18, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

I'm currently watching (though kinda slowly--last one I watched was "Memento Mori") so I will fill in the plot summaries for "Synchrony" and "Elegy" when I get to it. I'm starting (finally) on "Sanguinarium" now, although I saw that quite a while ago and didn't think it made much sense. There's always new sources (I'm hoping to get that Philosophy book sometime) so the articles will continue to build. Several already have FA potential :) Glimmer721 ^talk 22:30, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Everything sounds excellent. I mean to finish up Season 5 one of these days.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 02:10, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

Congrats on your new FA, Triangle (The X-Files). If you can create an FA, you a great Wikipedian. You deserve a cheeseburger. TBrandley 17:45, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Haha, thanks! This is easily the best barnstar I've gotten. ;)--Gen. Quon (Talk) 04:22, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks, TBrandley 06:15, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Gen. Quon. You have new messages at Talk:All Souls (The X-Files)/GA1.
Message added 04:49, 6 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks, TBrandley 04:49, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Ratings info?

Hey man. Is there any chance you could try that news archive you use to find some ratings info for me? I can find the figures for Episode 14 (Twin Peaks) but not for the episodes either side of it. There's stuff cited in the article as is but the info I've seen in the past from the Chicago Sun-Times gives different figures to that source and I sort of prefer to trust a newspaper I can name and cite than a mysterious scan. And is there anything you need reviewed or sourced in return? GRAPPLE X 01:41, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Sure, I can look that up. I think there might be a good chance of it being out there (one of the archives we just got has a lot more Nielsen ratings info). I think I'm going to nominated "Mind's Eye", if you'd like to look over that.--03:52, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

I'll get right on it. Thanks dude! GRAPPLE X 03:54, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! I'll try to get the info to you by tomorrow!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 03:54, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

The X-Files

Hi! I've dropped by to let you know that I have watched my first episode of The X-Files today. I've never seen it until today; it was good; I'm plan on watching the rest of the first season throughout the next days. Also, I will review "Folie à Deux" (The X-Files) very soon, and you other GAN article has been put on hold by Crisco 1492 (talk · contribs). Thanks, TBrandley 02:26, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Which one did you see? GRAPPLE X 02:28, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

I saw "Pilot". Don't know if it is good compared to the others, it seemed good. I plan on watching "Triangle", "Squeeze", and "X-Cops", as, after reading the plot summarizes, seem very good. Cheers, TBrandley 02:32, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Aye, Pilot's quality. Season one is patchy, great when it's good and terrible when it's bad; but I'd recommend watching it from the off. You'll appreciate the overall arcs if you see them developing, especially from seasons one to four when it all still made sense. GRAPPLE X 02:38, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Cool. I'll do that, and force myself to watch the bad episodes. Thanks! Yeah, I've heard bad things about those last seasons, particularly the ninth season. Heard bad rumors/reviews about it. Cheers! TBrandley 02:48, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Very cool! I agree with Grapple, although "Triangle", "Squeeze", and "X-Cops" are all very good stand-alones. But I'd recommend watching in order too, just for fun. The last season, however, is truly bad. There are some OK episodes, but it doesn't compare to the first seven. And thanks for the GA heads up!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 02:50, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

You could save yourself some facepalming by stopping at "Requiem" and acting like that's it all over. It was written as a logical ending anyway so that should work out fine. Now just to get Ruby and Crisco watching it too... GRAPPLE X 02:53, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! I will for sure watch them in order. Perhaps, I will force myself to watch Season 8 and 9, without Mulder. :( Haha; let's get everyone watching the show. Don't get my brother watching The X-Files thought; he hates The X-Files, and science fiction itself. OMG. Cheers, TBrandley 02:59, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Too late. I watched the first three episodes a few weeks ago (I was especially curious about "Squeeze" because of its FA status). But I have too many other shows I need to catch up on before I can watch anymore! Ruby 2010/2013 03:11, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Speaking of television, I'm watching Gordon Ramsay's Hotel Hell right now, on the Fox network; it's great. I'll watch "Deep Throat", the second episode, soon after I'm done watching Hell. TBrandley 03:14, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Definitely watch them in order to see the show and characters develop. I watched the first two season sort of out of order because I jumped in BBC America's random reruns and it was the most hilarious thing going from "Anasazi" to "Deep Throat" (I also saw "One Breath" way before "Duane Barry"). So now I'm trying to go back through some of the major episodes in order. By the way, has anyone here seen Sherlock? And its frustrating cliffhanger? They're not filming the next series until January, which means it'll probably air on BBC that summer and then on PBS several months later. Glimmer721 ^talk 01:27, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, I'd say order matters. Not so much for the standalones, but definitely for the mytharcs. And I'm watching Sherlock right now. I've finished series 1, but I'm half way done with series 2. So... spoilers. ;)--Gen. Quon (Talk) 04:06, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

The Benedict Cumberbatch one? Spoiler: it's not very good. GRAPPLE X 04:07, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Hahaha, yeah. I enjoy it, but I'm definitely not in the "Sherlock"-mania camp. I save that energy for The X-Files, Doctor Who, and The Office.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 04:08, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Definite the last time I let my trousers dictate viewing schedules. On a similarly phallic front, "Deep Throat" is up at FAC now. GRAPPLE X 04:11, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Thought you might like to see this, only added a day ago. GRAPPLE X 10:16, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Oh by the way Grapple, did you see this correction I made on "Squeeze"? I wasn't sure if you wanted to keep the wikilink or not since one of the FA reviewers wasn't pleased with it. Glimmer721 ^talk 22:33, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Hmm. I'll just delink it. GRAPPLE X 22:52, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Gen. Quon. You have new messages at Talk:Blink (Doctor Who)/GA1.
Message added 03:08, 16 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cheers, TBrandley 03:08, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Gen. Quon. You have new messages at Talk:Folie à Deux (The X-Files)/GA1.
Message added 17:06, 19 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks, TBrandley 17:06, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Typo

I attempted to fix a typo here, although I'm not sure if I did it correctly because it could be "is" or "was". Also, that Smoking Man & Son picture has been deleted... Glimmer721 ^talk 01:15, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

It was supposed to be 'was'. I fixed. That sucks about the Bill and Son pic. That one was a good one. I tried to fix what I could.--Gen. Quon (Talk) 16:08, 20 August 2012 (UTC)