User talk:Jax 0677/Archive 22
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Jax 0677. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | ← | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | Archive 24 | Archive 25 |
Speedy deletion nomination of 2019 United States Border closure
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on 2019 United States Border closure requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MelanieN (talk) 00:20, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
- Jax, you knew full well that the result of that AfD was Delete. You should not have recreated it. -- MelanieN (talk) 00:23, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
2019 United States Border closure listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2019 United States Border closure. Since you had some involvement with the 2019 United States Border closure redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. MelanieN (talk) 05:35, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Janice Griffith listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Janice Griffith. Since you had some involvement with the Janice Griffith redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Nil Einne (talk) 15:35, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
ACON Investments LLC listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ACON Investments LLC. Since you had some involvement with the ACON Investments LLC redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. dmartin969 05:15, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Gas Monkey
Yelling it in all-caps doesn't make it more valid. And "DISAGREE PER BRD" means nothing at all. BRD is not an excuse to revert: it is a way to settle a dispute. And what dispute do we have here? You're writing up semi-promotional articles, larded with lousy pictures you took yourself. Gas Monkey Live doesn't have a single proper source: even the ones that could be called secondary are just local promotional write-ups, and I wonder if you have a conflict of interest you need to declare here. Drmies (talk) 15:11, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - @Drmies:, I have no conflict of interest, you are welcome to post better pictures if you like. I use all caps in the computer application that I use, so I forgot to turn off caps lock. The article is not promotional, talks about a major music venue in Dallas, and is properly sourced. --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:32, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- No, no pictures is better than bad pictures. You are well aware of our guidelines, and yet you turn these articles into galleries. Whether the articles are promotional or not is probably not easy for you to decide, though I'm surprised that you would say "properly sourced" when you know that's simply not true. You have obviously been to that place a couple of times: COI doesn't mean you get free beers or whatever, it simply means you have a conflict of interest, and it seems pretty clear to me that you do, and that it clouds your judgment. Drmies (talk) 23:31, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Re-Volts
Template:Re-Volts has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Aspects (talk) 22:15, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Maintenance templates generally go at the top
This is just a quick note to let you know that maintenance templates, including the link rot template you've been adding to articles, should be placed at the top of the article and not at the bottom. ElKevbo (talk) 17:35, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - @ElKevbo:, thank you very much for your feedback. I will take this under advisement. However, sometimes, I am editing from a phone, which makes it easier to add the {{LR}} tag to whatever section is most convenient. Furthermore, the {{LR}} tags are usually removed within a few days, if not a few hours, because the issue is quickly rectified. --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:40, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
WP:CEN is now open!
To all interested parties: Now that it has a proper shortcut, the current events noticeboard has now officially opened for discussion!
WP:CEN came about as an idea I explored through a request for comment that closed last March. Recent research has re-opened the debate on Wikipedia's role in a changing faster-paced internet. Questions of WP:NOTNEWS and WP:Recentism are still floating around. That being said, there are still plenty of articles to write and hopefully this noticeboard can positively contribute to that critical process.
Thank you for your participation in the RFC, and I hope to see you at WP:CEN soon! –MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 19:05, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
Repointing redirects
I don't agree with you repointing song/album articles to specific sections when said release is mentioned at more than one place on the article. It's always down to someone's (in this case, your) assessment on where there is "more" information about the topic, but I believe we should be letting readers find the information on the article themselves instead of forcing them to look at one section first. Also, your move of Metal Galaxy (album) to Metal galaxy and then requesting a move with "CAPS" as the reason, when you caused said capitalisation issue...what was the point? Please don't move others' articles to incorrectly capitalised namespaces. You should have just requested it before moving it anywhere. Also, I don't require a ping/reply template, I still watch your talk page. Thanks. Ss112 20:18, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - I disagree with you about pointing to a specific section, but you are entitled to your opinion. I believe in WP:POLA when redirecting, which is why I choose a section. I moved Metal Galaxy (album) to the site that had the most similar name to the title that is the prime direction for now. The article ended up in the correct place eventually, and should have been created at the correct title in the first place. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:41, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
- Jax, no user is obligated to start an article over a redirect another user created. I wanted to make the article, and I wanted it in mainspace and not in draftspace in case another user started the article in mainspace first, so that's why I made it where I did. And why did you just link "the article" in your reply to WP:OWN? What does any of this have to do with ownership? Was anything in my message unreasonable and indicating anything as my article? No. I asked you a question. Don't be passive aggressive. We're all well aware Wikipedia is a collaborative encyclopedia, but that doesn't mean we all agree. Ss112 00:58, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - "Please don't move others' articles". You should have put in a move request to move Metal Galaxy (album) to Metal Galaxy --Jax 0677 (talk) 02:46, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- I forgot to put in a move request. If I knew you were going to take "others' articles" as not meaning "articles others created" but to be an indication of ownership, then I would have made sure to say "Please do not move articles to incorrectly capitalised namespaces". Jeez. Don't take the worst meaning from words, because as I'm sure you're aware from when you've been misunderstood, sometimes they're ambiguous. Ss112 04:10, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
- Jax, no user is obligated to start an article over a redirect another user created. I wanted to make the article, and I wanted it in mainspace and not in draftspace in case another user started the article in mainspace first, so that's why I made it where I did. And why did you just link "the article" in your reply to WP:OWN? What does any of this have to do with ownership? Was anything in my message unreasonable and indicating anything as my article? No. I asked you a question. Don't be passive aggressive. We're all well aware Wikipedia is a collaborative encyclopedia, but that doesn't mean we all agree. Ss112 00:58, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Bury Me in Blasphemy
Hello, Jax 0677. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bury Me in Blasphemy".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 08:29, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - @CptViraj:, are you sure I started the actual article, and not just the redirect itself? --Jax 0677 (talk) 12:50, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- Hii, This notice was automatically sent through Twinkle's csd menu. My apologize. -- CptViraj (📧) 13:03, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
YouTubeCanDoBetter listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect YouTubeCanDoBetter. Since you had some involvement with the YouTubeCanDoBetter redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 14:04, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:The Spill Canvas
Template:The Spill Canvas has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Aspects (talk) 05:37, 29 July 2019 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Cerebral Ballzy
Template:Cerebral Ballzy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Aspects (talk) 23:17, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Gruntruck
Template:Gruntruck has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Aspects (talk) 23:37, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Our Last Night
Template:Our Last Night has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Aspects (talk) 23:49, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
George Hamilton IV
I saw you just removed the discussion from 2016. I say be WP:BOLD and split off the discography yourself, since I doubt anyone will object. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:37, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - @TenPoundHammer:, I just split the article. In the future, when you post on a talk page, please link to the article in question. --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:31, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Thanks for creating George Hamilton discography.
User:Atsme while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
Consider merging this with his biography. There is plenty of room.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Atsme}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Atsme Talk 📧 17:29, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - @Atsme:, please see User_talk:Jax_0677#George_Hamilton_IV. --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:31, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
- LOL, well of course. Atsme Talk 📧 17:33, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
"July-August 2019 European heat wave" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect July-August 2019 European heat wave. Since you had some involvement with the July-August 2019 European heat wave redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Interstellarity (talk) 20:28, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
There is no mention of "Cold" at Korn discography
Please add the single to the discography, which you should have done after making the redirect. Thank you. Ss112 05:29, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - @Ss112:, if you look carefully here, you will see that "Cold" was removed after I created the redirect, and should be directed to the album once that article is indeed created. --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:31, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
- Perhaps you could have sourced it after it was removed, considering you created the redirect. Also, don't edit war over retaining a bare URL when the peak is accessible through the reference in the header. Nobody updates accessdates on discographies, including yourself from when I've seen you add chart peaks on the few occasions you actually have, so don't act like you do. To allay your whinging, however, I've changed the precious date as I assume that's what your problem is. Ss112 17:04, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
- You know, it's funny if your concern is an accessdate considering you couldn't be bothered to supply one with the additional BARE URL you supplied. Did you realise that? Instead of updating the accessdate of the reference in the header, you provided a bare URL with no accessdate. Make your edits make sense in future. Ss112 17:09, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - @Ss112:, the access date will likely appear when the Linkrot tag is dealt with. --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:11, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
- So you presumably supplied the bare URL because the reference in the header still said "2018" in its accessdate, when you could have easily fixed that instead, but then to fix your bare URL having no accessdate, you tagged the article for link rot... that doesn't make any damn sense. You would have to be one of the laziest editors I know on this site. You tag and basically never fix the problems you're tagging because the "burden" isn't on you. Even when you "create" articles, you copy half an irrelevant chart table from another article without changing any of the accessdates. You have no right to be complaining about refs being "obtained in 2018" when you add wikitables with chart peaks for singles to album articles without changing any of the accessdates. I have seen that at least a dozen times. What absolute nonsense and hypocrisy. Ss112 17:14, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
- You know, it's funny if your concern is an accessdate considering you couldn't be bothered to supply one with the additional BARE URL you supplied. Did you realise that? Instead of updating the accessdate of the reference in the header, you provided a bare URL with no accessdate. Make your edits make sense in future. Ss112 17:09, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
- Perhaps you could have sourced it after it was removed, considering you created the redirect. Also, don't edit war over retaining a bare URL when the peak is accessible through the reference in the header. Nobody updates accessdates on discographies, including yourself from when I've seen you add chart peaks on the few occasions you actually have, so don't act like you do. To allay your whinging, however, I've changed the precious date as I assume that's what your problem is. Ss112 17:04, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Thanks for creating List of August 2019 Hong Kong anti-extradition bill protests.
User:Lefcentreright while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
Please fix references. There is an entire stream of red. I believe the article has evolved beyond list point.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lefcentreright}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Lefcentreright (talk) 21:13, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - @Lefcentreright:, hopefully the bots can fix this soon. If you need it fixed quickly, I will gladly revert the split. This is why I hate list defined references. --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:15, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - List defined references are a pain. Keep up the good work! Lefcentreright (talk) 21:18, 16 August 2019 (UTC)
I'm not sure that Best Ever Trivia Show meets the television notability guidelines. So far all I've found is press releases. It's been on the air three months and doesn't even have an IMDb entry. That's plenty of time for a tv show to gain attention. I think you'd be better off sending it to AFD, unless somehow you find something I don't. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:24, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - @TenPoundHammer:, I disagree, but OK. --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:27, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
Your Help Desk question
Hello there. Next time, when asking a question at the Help Desk, please specify everything in your question to save others lots of time. Your last question was very vague and editors were confused about what you were asking. Regards, Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 07:16, 25 August 2019 (UTC)
Link rot
Why did you add this reference and then the tag for link rot once you were done? It suggests you understand the implications of your actions but couldn't be bothered to make the effort to rectify the problem. Given you have been editing here since 2009 (you are certainly no novice) I am left with one impression...utter laziness. Please correct me if I am mistaken and if so, I'd love to hear why you performed the above mentioned action. Robvanvee 07:56, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - @Robvanvee:, I added the reference because the album title needed a reference. I added the linkrot tag because I was in a hurry. In any event, I don't think it is a big deal. --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- Well, that just confirms my suspicion then. Robvanvee 13:39, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- Unfortunately Robvanvee, you just learned what many other editors already know about Jax. He has been brought to ANI more than once because of this behavior. Jax thinks linkrot is run by a bot, yet it isn't and he is just creating work for others who can be doing more productive things. He thinks access dates are automatically added when the tool for fixing link rot is used, but it is not. He abuses the link rot tag because of an unwillingness to correct the issues himself, and he is being especially inconsiderate when adding the tag to his own contributions to an article. I would be willing to bring this to ANI in order to discourage this unconstructive behavior that is a detriment to Wikipedia collaboration, and I wouldn't limit it to linkrot tagging but to all of his overtagging of articles. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 17:24, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- It really does leave one wondering why they even bother in the first place...? Robvanvee 19:05, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Unfortunately Robvanvee, you just learned what many other editors already know about Jax. He has been brought to ANI more than once because of this behavior. Jax thinks linkrot is run by a bot, yet it isn't and he is just creating work for others who can be doing more productive things. He thinks access dates are automatically added when the tool for fixing link rot is used, but it is not. He abuses the link rot tag because of an unwillingness to correct the issues himself, and he is being especially inconsiderate when adding the tag to his own contributions to an article. I would be willing to bring this to ANI in order to discourage this unconstructive behavior that is a detriment to Wikipedia collaboration, and I wouldn't limit it to linkrot tagging but to all of his overtagging of articles. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 17:24, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Well, that just confirms my suspicion then. Robvanvee 13:39, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Ali Jones
Template:Ali Jones has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Aspects (talk) 22:00, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
Incorrect info
Thanks so much for updating the Goo Goo Dolls page. As a super fan, I look at it a lot, but I wanted to respectfully let you know that regarding the Miracle Pill album updates, Indestructible and Money, Fame, & Fortune are not singles, they are just pre-releases which is normal when enticing people to buy an album. Miracle Pill is the only single so far. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:6000:1501:462A:95F6:A90B:15AE:7B5F (talk) 22:49, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
"Template:CM" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:CM. Since you had some involvement with the Template:CM redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. InvalidOS (talk) 15:46, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
Colt Ford discography
I don't get your tagging on Colt Ford discography. The source, even what you can see before you hit the paywall, clearly says that the single is called "Slow Ride" and features Mitchell Tenpenny. Why did you slap a [citation needed] on it when there was already a source verifying everything? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:44, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - @TenPoundHammer:, sorry for my error, I missed the reference. --Jax 0677 (talk) 21:00, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
I'm trying to assume good faith here. If you really think people might not know where Dallas, Texas is despite there being a link to that major city's article, please use the article's talk page (Talk:Murder of Botham Jean) to discuss it. You've added it twice ([1], [2]) and added a {{where}} to it afterwards ([3]). EvergreenFir (talk) 16:36, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
I saw you submitted the draft for review. Wondering if you intended on reviewing it? I've been building it since someone moved it to draftspace two months ago. Don't wanna wait another two months. Cognissonance (talk) 20:38, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - @Cognissonance:, not sure that I can both submit and approve the article. --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:46, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
- I'll try to see if the guy who moved it can do it. Cognissonance (talk) 20:55, 14 October 2019 (UTC)
Fire & Brimstone
Can you please be a little more judicious when tagging articles as stubs, as you did with Fire & Brimstone? Anything with more than two sentences is very unlikely to be a stub. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:05, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Pitfalls has been accepted
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
GirthSummit (blether) 05:24, 15 October 2019 (UTC)Move request
You might be interested in this move request. I would like to move Matthew Ramsey (songwriter) to Matthew Ramsey. You can see the move request here. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 00:12, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Hard Rock Hotel collapse
Just a heads-up that I redirected this to 1031 Canal, which is the development's name and probably a lot less vague, so I hope that's OK with you. Nate • (chatter) 04:27, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - @Mrschimpf:, thanks. --Jax 0677 (talk) 12:40, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Merge
There is a merge request here to merge Guitjo (double-neck) and Banjo guitar. Please participate in discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:03, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Catch 21
Catch 21, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 03:15, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
TFD
You may also be interested in this TFD on {{Tucker Beathard}}. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 17:52, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
"Template:Rfl" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Rfl. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Rfl redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 02:06, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
AFd
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Spurs is an AFD that you might be interested regarding the article The Spurs. Please weigh in with your opinions to help form a consensus. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:20, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
"Josh Murty" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Josh Murty. Since you had some involvement with the Josh Murty redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Richhoncho (talk) 17:04, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
My recent edits to articles on MFSB members
I noted that you've been heavily involved with these articles, so I made a few tweaks to them. For instance, at Ron Kersey, I recategorized, changing the "American keyboardists" category to "20th-century American keyboardists", also adding wikilinks to artists for whom an article exists, and adding additional categories, including "American music arrangers", and I added this category to the Thom Bell and Vincent Montana Jr. articles, too. In my opinion, the categories I added (e.g. "American music arrangers") are appropriate for these articles, as they're clearly supported by their content. If these were somehow bad edits, feel free to revert, but hopefully these were good edits.--2601:153:901:60C0:4030:5257:78E8:CB2E (talk) 17:21, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - @2601:153:901:60C0:4030:5257:78E8:CB2E:, thanks! --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:53, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
The article November 2019 North American cold wave has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:18, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of November 2019 North American cold wave for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article November 2019 North American cold wave is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/November 2019 North American cold wave until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:59, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Nomination for deletion of Template:Strife
Template:Strife has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. 212.135.65.247 (talk) 15:36, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Arcade
Template:Arcade has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. 212.135.65.247 (talk) 15:36, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:KGC
Template:KGC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. 212.135.65.247 (talk) 15:45, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Better source needed at Pentatonix discography
Genuinely curious as to why, given it's the Oricon albums chart and it's literally using Oricon as the source. -- Joklol (talk) 18:08, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - @Joklol:, the source is dated 2015, and the album is dated 2019. Please link to the article in question when you post on a user talk page. Thanks! --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:21, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
"Template:Fns" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:Fns. Since you had some involvement with the Template:Fns redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 19:24, 27 November 2019 (UTC)
"Vitalyevna" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Vitalyevna. Since you had some involvement with the Vitalyevna redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 19:25, 29 November 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of List of Marvel Family enemies (A–G) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Marvel Family enemies (A–G) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Marvel Family enemies (A–G) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reyk YO! 12:45, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
My close of the Template:Strife TfD
Hello, just thought I should tell you that I reverted your revert as non-admins can close TfDs as delete as seen at Wikipedia:Non-admin closure#Templates for discussion. If you have any other concerns about my close I'm happy to discuss it. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 23:04, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - @Trialpears:, sorry, I learn something new every day. --Jax 0677 (talk) 19:32, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Jax 0677
Thank you for creating Harmonies for the Haunted (EP).
User:Doomsdayer520, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thank you for this new article, though I recommend making less dependent on Facebook and other not-so-reliable sources.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:08, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - @Doomsdayer520:, there are several external third party references in Harmonies for the Haunted. I just added another reference under the "Critical reception" section. --Jax 0677 (talk) 19:44, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:What Is This?
Template:What Is This? has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:51, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
The Sick Bag Song
Errr any reason why you reverted me, and with such a rude edit summary to boot? GiantSnowman 14:32, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - @GiantSnowman:, please link to the article in question when you post on a talk page. I reverted the edit per WP:BRD because there is no article for The Sick Bag Song. --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:35, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- It is a valid redirect to a relevant section on Nick Cave's article where it is mentioned... GiantSnowman 14:44, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- Hi it's hard to follow BRD when you won't D and just revert... GiantSnowman 16:54, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- I've created an article as requested and restored the link on the template. GiantSnowman 17:00, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- Hi it's hard to follow BRD when you won't D and just revert... GiantSnowman 16:54, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
- It is a valid redirect to a relevant section on Nick Cave's article where it is mentioned... GiantSnowman 14:44, 18 December 2019 (UTC)
"H4TH" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect H4TH. Since you had some involvement with the H4TH redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 01:50, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Template:The Deadweights
Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Template:The Deadweights, to Wikipedia. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:51, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- EDIT: I have toned down/removed some parts of the automated speedy deletion message, because they are very aggressive for such a case like this (a template consisting of very elaborate hoaxes). Regards, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:57, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Deadweights articles
Please see Wikipedia:Teahouse#Fake articles? for discussion of these articles and the related template. If you have actual sources that establish the real existence of this band, please post there or notify the deleting admin Theroadislong. The conclusion was that this is a rather elaborate hoax, involving multiple Wikipedia articles and at least two outside web pages, that has been in place since 2007. Do you dispute that? DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 19:45, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - @DESiegel:, I do not dispute, nor have I researched the issue. Please leave the navbox deleted, but know that I only created the navbox, not the article. --Jax 0677 (talk) 19:48, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- Understood, you relied in good faith on the creators and editors of the various articles, as initially i did. A hoax so well-established and long lasting is, I hope, unusual here. No one is blaming you for having, in 2015, added a navbox to several articles created in 2007 by other editors. Several respected and experienced editors had edited the hoax articles, apparently without realizing the hoax. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 19:55, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
EP is capitalized
Why would your purposely move an article to an incorrect disambiguated title, such as you did with Sheep (Smile Empty Soul album). You know that EP is capitalized. The fact that this requires administrator's help is no excuse to move to something else that is clearly and knowingly wrong because it's going to require assistance to fix no matter what. If you can't do it yourself, it's better not to do anything at all. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 03:45, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- Reply - @Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars:, I was on a phone at the time, which makes it more difficult to create a move request. The article should have been created at Sheep (EP) in the first place. --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:02, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
- Exactly. So don't bother changing it to something it shouldn't be when you can just wait and request the change to what it should be. WP:NORUSH. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 20:01, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:What Is This?
Template:What Is This? has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 20:09, 29 December 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Hong Kong protests (2019–present)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Hong Kong protests (2019–present) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -KAP03 (Talk • Contributions • Email) 18:57, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Happy New Year!
-
MMXX Lunar Calendar
Have a great 2020 and thanks for your continued contributions to Wikipedia.
– 2020 is a leap year – news article.
– Background color is Classic Blue (#0F4C81), Pantone's 2020 Color of the year
– Utopes (talk) 09:09, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
Your RFC at Talk:2019–20 Hong Kong protests
An WP:RFC is required to be neutrally-worded. I suggest removing the repeated "this is fact" bits, taking out the scare quotes around besieged, and separating the paragraph at the end into your comment in a "Survey" section. After all, those parts are part of the thing you're asking editors to decide. --Aquillion (talk) 06:21, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of killings by law enforcement officers in the United States, September 2019, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defunct (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of pipeline accidents in the United States in 2020, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pipeline and Fatality (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
"I Don't Love You"
Just after editing a few Kelsea Ballerini pages (please check out Draft:Kelsea (album) and feel free to edit the draft if more is known) you edited the I Don't Love You (disambiguation) page with an update tag. Because of this, unless you tell me otherwise I'll assume that you're expecting that the third Kelsea Ballerini album will have a song titled I Don't Love You. Is this right?? Georgia guy (talk) 19:23, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
- Reply - @Georgia guy:, I Don't Love You (Lindsay Ell song). --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:30, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Jax 0677
Thank you for creating List of pipeline accidents in the United States in 1988.
User:Insertcleverphrasehere, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
I'd suggest changing the format of the list items to include the Day/month only. Would improve organisation, and the year is unnecessary given that this list is only 1988 anyway.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Insertcleverphrasehere}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
— Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)(click me!) 21:30, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
- Reply -@Insertcleverphrasehere:, be bold. --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:34, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
- Jax 0677, I was kind enough to leave a note with some suggestions, don't just tell me to do it myself. New Page Review is not cleanup. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)(click me!) 21:41, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Terumasa Hino
Template:Terumasa Hino has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Dan arndt (talk) 09:47, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Template:Huntress
Please do not put maintenance tags on templates, as you did on Template:Huntress. It causes the maintenance tag to show up on every page using the template. If a template needs maintenance, I would suggest bringing it up on the template's talk page so it doesn't interfere with articles using the template. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:32, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
- If you need to add something to a template which should not be transcluded into the pages which use it, you can use <noinclude> --kingboyk (talk) 15:32, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
I think I took care of the sourcing issues here. The sentence
She was nominated for Best New Artist at the 2015 Grammy Awards.
didn't need a {{citation needed}} because it is already sourced later on in the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:30, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
The single "Who Do You Think I Am" already has a source under the subheader "016–present: Big Day in a Small Town and Your Life Is a Record". Facts only need to be cited once, not every single time they appear. Same thing with the sentence "She was nominated for Best New Artist at the 2015 Grammy Awards." in the lead -- that's already cited further down the page and doesn't need to be cited again in the intro. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:12, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of List of film director and cinematographer collaborations for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of film director and cinematographer collaborations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of film director and cinematographer collaborations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bait30 Talk? 06:46, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
Ways to improve Ice Road Truckers (season 5)
Hello, Jax 0677,
Thank you for creating Ice Road Truckers (season 5).
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Please add references.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.