Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

Purge
Shortcut WP:AFD/T

20 August 2024

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< August 19	August 21 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Ritesh S Kumar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable filmmaker who does meet WP:NBIO, WP:NDIRECTOR or WP:GNG. Sources are interviews, press releases or trivial coverage. Looking at Secrets of Love (web series) based on the current sources, I don't think it meets notability either. S0091 (talk) 14:25, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and India. S0091 (talk) 14:25, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NGC 7075

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This galaxy is not notable, all of the references are to catalog entries. Parejkoj (talk) 06:21, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is some commentary beyond catalogue entries about this galaxy here: https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/499/4/5719/5923577?login=false , https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/489/3/3739/5554765?login=false and https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/484/3/4239/5299582?login=false. The radio source accociated with the galaxy is descripted in a more than a passing reference in a table here https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/282/1/40/1036079?login=false. It is a keep for me. --C messier (talk) 08:59, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

None of those papers are about the galaxy itself, they just have some paragraphs discussing it. That's pretty weak notability at best. - Parejkoj (talk) 18:09, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Still these are multiple sources that provide commentary that is more than a trivial mention. The ALMA series is quite low volume, only discussing a dozen objects at most, including this particular galaxy. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material WP:SIGCOV. C messier (talk) 18:27, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment According to WP:NASTRO we presume notability because it was discovered before 1850 but a careful investigation may show that it is not notable. Even if we discover sufficient references to meet our notability critera we may go on to decide there should not be an article on this galaxy. I hope that is completely clear! Thincat (talk) 12:01, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Although it might not be notable, we can redirect this galaxy to Lists of NGC Objects (7000-7800) as an alternative like NGC 1016, NGC 4 and NGC 529.--Galaxybeing (talk) 02:10, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:35, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:13, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Czech Airlines destinations

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NOT, WP:NCORP, plain logic

Logic is failed because this is a largely a list of places that Czech Airlines wasn't flying to in February 2024, as is indicated by the overwhelming majority of them being listed as "terminated". Czech Airlines only flew to four destinations in February 2024, all of which are already mentioned on the Czech Airlines page, making this page redundant. Anyone asserting that these "terminated" destinations are of historical interest needs to show historical sourcing for that (i.e., historical journal, history book etc.) - Wikipedia is not the place to publish your own historical research about where an airline used to fly.

WP:NOT is failed because this is a complete listing of the services of a company. As such it is excluded under WP:NOTCATALOG no. 6 which states that "Listings to be avoided include [...] products and services". It is also an indiscriminate listing - all destinations ever flown to, however briefly, are listed without any attempt to summarise them which is against WP:IINFO.

WP:NCORP (which applies to the services of companies as well as the companies themselves) is failed because none of the sources here are independent, third-party, reliable sources. This article is largely sourced to old timetables published by the airline (e.g., this one), or to the company website, or to run-of-the-mill articles based on company press-releases and statements and trade-press coverage or local-news failing WP:AUD. Additionally, many of the links are 404, making them fail verifiability. Sources that clearly pass WP:ORGIND are needed, but none are present nor could I find any. FOARP (talk) 08:34, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business, Aviation, Lists, and Czech Republic. FOARP (talk) 08:34, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Travel and tourism-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep/merge It continues to be false that this falls under NOTCATLOGUE, as this is not used as a resource for conducting business, particularly if they're about to cease conducting business! The mere fact that people can be informed about the company's operations does not make it a business resource, nor are products and services broadly forbidden. A basic list of two countries and four continents is not a replacement of the information. The article needs more sources, but there is adequate coverage of the airline's operations to include its destinations here or in the main article. A link being dead does not mean the fact itself is impossible to verify or the whole article must be deleted. Listing former destination is not indiscrimination, but that could call for modifications rather than complete deletion. Reywas92^Talk 13:23, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This airline literally only flew to four destinations "As of February 2024". What is the point of listing places it possibly used to fly to at some point, but didn't fly to in Feb 2024, based on original research in primary sources? If the answer is "because of historical importance", then where are the historians covering this topic? PS - see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Air Malta destinations which recently closed as delete, which also covered an airline whose destinations were all "terminated", and where you made substantially the same arguments. FOARP (talk) 13:39, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - To expand on the WP:OR issue discussed above, take the listing of Tirana as a "Terminated" destination on this page. This is cited to a 1966 pamphlet issued by the airline, but that surely doesn't support a claim that the destination was "terminated" in February 2024? In fact there's no way to reach that conclusion with this data, because even if Tirana isn't included in Czech Airlines' current services, there's a bunch of different reasons why that might be so that don't involve them previously having gone there but now having terminated the service, including errors in the original claim (or the later claim that they don't fly there), Tirana having been a destination they planned to go to but never went to, Tirana being part of a wider network, and the flight still being operated.

In fact, according to the airline website, Czech Airlines do still fly to Tirana.

Now this might seem like a minor, one-off error, but in fact this entire list was largely assembled using the same approach of synthesising primary sources to reach a conclusion that they don't actually support. Moreover this is repeated across the entire corpus of airline-destination articles as a whole. FOARP (talk) 13:32, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, various WP:NOT violations. Rosbif73 (talk) 06:00, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:IINFO. A list of every place this airline has ever flown to since it started operations 100 years ago feels like a collection of trivia. Sunnya343 (talk) 15:54, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep there's no reason to delete this - as per the other AfDs I'm not convinced WP:NOT applies and the destinations are well covered in WP:GNG. Furthermore, this airline is ending operations in less than two months, so this currently and will serve as encyclopedic information about places they flew. SportingFlyer T·C 16:18, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The other thing to note is that those claiming WP:NOT - there's no broad consensus about whether these actually fail WP:NOT as a group at this time. SportingFlyer T·C 17:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:34, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brands Hatch Racing

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable team that did not qualify for a single Grand Prix it entered. WP:SIGCOV is literally non-existent. All WP:RS leads to the track it is named after. SpacedFarmer (talk) 08:37, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Motorsport-related deletion discussions. SpacedFarmer (talk) 08:37, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and United Kingdom. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge – Brands Hatch Racing was the circuit's team and was run by John Webb while he was chief executive of Brands Hatch. There are a few other races which aren't mentioned in the existing article. This can be better covered on the circuit's article. 5225_C (talk • contributions) 12:33, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support deletion - although your argument about never qualifying for a race could hold true for the equally awful Life Racing Engines GarethBaloney (talk) 13:12, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Merge or delete?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:34, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Finn Ecrepont

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG, lacks SIGCOV. Dougal18 (talk) 11:41, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Scotland. Shellwood (talk) 12:50, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The way the Ayrshire Post went on and on about him, there's enough coverage to meet GNG. Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 09:35, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 20:59, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. One Daily Record source is decent - where is the rest? If sources are found which show significant coverage please ping me. Giant Snowman 21:02, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just from googling his name, there are at least five stories online which focus on him (so not mentions in general match reports or counting any of the stories from his 60-yard goal). The Ayrshire Post have also published at least six stories about him specifically, I don't know how many of these are online though. Stevie fae Scotland (talk) 11:13, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:22, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:33, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of LATAM Brasil destinations

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NOT, WP:NCORP, plain logic

Logic is failed because this is in large part a list of places that LATAM Brasil wasn't regularly flying to in January 2024, as is indicated by many of them being listed as "terminated"/seasonal or as not being operated by LATAM Brazil. The destinations flown to by LATAM Brasil are already adequately summarised in LATAM Airlines Brasil#Destinations, and their historical development is already discussed at LATAM Airlines Brasil#History, meaning this page is redundant. Wikipedia is not the place to seek to publish original historical research about where Airlines used to fly.

WP:NOT is failed because this is a complete listing of the services of a company. As such it is excluded under WP:NOTCATALOG no. 6 which states that "Listings to be avoided include [...] products and services". It is also an indiscriminate listing - all destinations ever flown to, however briefly, are listed without any attempt to summarise them which is against WP:IINFO.

WP:NCORP (which applies to the services of companies as well as the companies themselves) is failed because none of the sources here are independent, third-party, reliable sources. This article is largely unsourced, and has been since at least 2015, but the part that is sourced is sourced to the company website, enthusiast blogs like Routesonline, or to run-of-the-mill articles based on company press-releases and statements and trade-press coverage. Additionally, many of the links are 404, making them fail verifiability. Sources that clearly pass WP:ORGIND are needed, but none are present.

For the same reasons I am also nominating List of LATAM Perú destinations which suffers from all of the same problems. FOARP (talk) 10:39, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation, Lists, Brazil, and Peru. FOARP (talk) 10:39, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Travel and tourism-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep/merge It continues to be false that this falls under NOTCATLOGUE, as this is not used as a resource for conducting business. The mere fact that people can be informed about the company's operations does not make it a business resource, nor are products and services broadly forbidden. A basic list of two countries and four continents is not a replacement of the information. The article needs more sources, but there is adequate coverage of the airline's operations to include its destinations here or in the main article. A link being dead does not mean the fact itself is impossible to verify or the whole article must be deleted. Listing former destination is not indiscrimination, but that could call for modifications rather than complete deletion. Reywas92^Talk 13:23, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This a is substantially the same information as the company publishes themselves, as is indicated by the use of the company website and company publications/press-releases as the source for them. Simply transcribing that on to Wiki is reproducing a catalogue, and indiscriminate. I note that you don’t cite even a single source to address the NCORP issues. FOARP (talk) 06:23, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - to expand on the original research issues raised in the nom, let's take the listing of Caracas as a "terminated" destination. This is cited to a 404 link to a May 2016 article on the Airlineroutes.com blog, which apparently was titled "LATAM Gradually Ends Venezuela Service late-May 2016". Setting aside that this is a WP:V fail because it's 404, and a low-quality source, instantly you can see that this is problematic because the service was described as "gradually" ending at some point in the future by routesonline.com, without any indication that it did end, nor is there any indication that the service wasn't being operated in January 2024. In actual fact LATAM Brasil are selling flights from Caracas right now on their website and probably were in January as well.

This is exactly the kind of problem you would expect to get when you synthesise primary sources through original research and exactly the reason why it is something we do not do on Wikipedia, yet it is used throughout this article and indeed in every airline destination-list article. FOARP (talk) 13:14, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, various WP:NOT violations. Rosbif73 (talk) 06:00, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTDB. Wikipedia isn't supposed to be a mirror of airline databases like FlightConnections.com. Sunnya343 (talk) 17:08, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep WP:NOT doesn't actually apply here. It's not a catalogue as it's not promotional, where an airline flies is necessary and encyclopedic to understanding the airline's scope, and it's sourced well enough that we're able to have it on the site. There are 23 sources at the moment, only one of which is to the airline's website, so the "largely unsourced" is battleground language, and there's an attempt to exclude the number of news sites and blogs which significantly cover airline routes from ever being reliable, which is incorrect. SportingFlyer T·C 17:48, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:25, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Conestoga College Digital TV

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Google News searching “Conestoga College Digital TV” yields no result. No independent significant coverage. Northern Moonlight 13:17, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Same editor submitted Draft:Conestoga College digital television but was declined for WP:NORG; they then created this article in main namespace the same day. Northern Moonlight 13:25, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Northern Moonlight 13:17, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Television, Education, Internet, and Canada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:17, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Conestoga College: I draftified this as the CCDTV social profiles do not help with wp:NORG. Doesn’t seem there is other material. CherryPie94 🍒🥧 (talk) 08:06, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:17, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Michal Pšenko

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to Slovakia at the 2002 Winter Olympics#Nordic combined because I could not find any significant coverage of this athlete to meet WP:GNG. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 11:36, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Olympics, and Slovakia. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 11:36, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning Keep per the extensive German article with several offline sources which appear to give several pages of coverage to him. BeanieFan11 (talk) 15:11, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The German article mostly provides database and not significant coverage in reliable sources. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 10:17, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you look at Enzyklopädie des Skispringens which provides pages of coverage to him? BeanieFan11 (talk) 14:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It would be appreciated if there are exact links to there. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 10:10, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Participated in four Nordic Ski World Championships. In 1999 he participated in both ski jumping and combined. That's pretty unusual, however he usually placed lowly as an "also-ran". Geschichte (talk) 13:52, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:16, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Symbols of Colotlán

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am not sure how this article can pass basic WP:GNG, Symbols? The title seems wrong, I would suggest a part merge to Colotlán or either delete. Govvy (talk) 11:59, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts and Mexico. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:20, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect: I could not find any coverage by Mexican media and the only cited source is from the city government [1]. Similarly, the Spanish Wikipedia article also only cites primary sources and the Flags of the World entry. Per WP:PRIMARY, a standalone article cannot be predicated on primary sources, but they may be utilized for small sections. Therefore, Symbols of Colotlán should redirect and its corresponding information be merged to Colotlán. XxTechnicianxX (talk) 16:30, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:16, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cue TV

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail general notability requirements. I also can't find any media sources. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 12:00, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and New Zealand. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 12:00, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media and Education. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:20, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:16, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Southern_Institute_of_Technology#Campuses: (othe possibler targets exist) -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 15:17, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:15, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Bartolozzi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not yet notable per WP:BIO, WP:CREATIVE or WP:ENTERTAINER. In a WP:BEFORE search the best I could find was the short Indy100 article on a hoax about his supposed death last year. The rest is social media, an article in WP:THESUN about the same hoax [2], and sponsored content pieces like these: [3], [4], [5]. Wikishovel (talk) 13:14, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Internet, and New Jersey. Wikishovel (talk) 13:14, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LabPlot

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am unable to find independent coverage to demonstrate WP:NSOFTWARE is met. The previous AFD did a poor job of testing notability, with the rationales to keep revolving around google hits, not sources. I have searched extensively and been unable to find any independent coverage. Note that the article has been substantially trimmed recently and led to the developers writing a blog post. At least one commenter on that article, as well as posters in the accompanying wikipediocracy thread also noted the lack of available sources. SmartSE (talk) 12:17, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. SmartSE (talk) 12:17, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of doctors working in the British media

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While there are, of course, doctors who work in British media, I wasn't able to find reliable sources that discuss this as a group. toweli (talk) 11:53, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, News media, Radio, Television, Health and fitness, and Lists. toweli (talk) 11:53, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Category-ify if that's an option. I BOLDly created Category:Medical doctors in British media. I'm not too keen on Ernest Hart (medical journalist), someone who died in 1898, being listed as 'working' in the present tense. Is it considered 'involved' or anti-consensus for me to add all of the listed to the category I just created? Svampesky (talk) 13:34, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Armanon Ka Balidaan-Aarakshan

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NTV. M S Hassan (talk | contributions) 10:33, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and India. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:39, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kugelmugel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No clear indication of notability, does not pass WP:GNG. All search for references show cursory mentions in "List of Micronations" or "List of places to go in Vienna" Soni (talk) 11:18, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. Soni (talk) 11:18, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:01, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kugelmugel was mentioned in 'Atlas Obscura' book. In german wiki there is a section 'Reactivation' and reference to viennese 'Kronen Zeitung' of 30th May 2004, that it has 'opened its borders with Austria'. Might be more notable than most of micronations. Kolijars (talk) 21:35, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oh, not 2004 but 2024 it is :) -> Kronen Zeitung, Wien-Ausgabe vom 30. Mai 2024, Seite 29. Kolijars (talk) 21:37, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The thing is, best I can tell it's still just a passing mention in a larger book. GNG requires some significant coverage of the topic in different sources, and I have not found it yet Soni (talk) 14:42, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If kept the article should be reworked to be about the unusual house rather than a micronation. The dewiki article begins with "Kugelmugel is a spherical house with a diameter of 8 metres..." Drop the micronation infobox. Reywas92^Talk 15:55, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any assessment of coverage by Atlas Obscura and elsewhere?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malinaccier (talk) 14:31, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:20, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Socialist Trade Union Centre

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails criteria laid down at WP:ORGCRITE. Lacks in-depth coverage, WP:CORPDEPTH. Run-of-the-mill routine news by WP:NEWSORGINDIA are inadequate. Gan Favourite (talk) 14:07, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and India. Gan Favourite (talk) 14:07, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:15, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment this nomination was one of nine made in under 10 minutes, all related to trade unions in Kerala, all with exactly the same cut and paste nomination, all containing the same vague wave at NEWSORGINDIA. None demonstrate any WP:BEFORE, nor show any searching in local language press, although the editor who nominated these appears familiar with Kerala. I'd appreciate if this could be relisted so I can have a chance to search for sourcing - I've addressed four of these nominations (all in my opinion keep), but the time required for each one is longer than I have before this hits the seven day threshold. Thanks and regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 05:59, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:20, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

United Trade Union Congress (Bolshevik)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails criteria laid down at WP:ORGCRITE. Lacks in-depth coverage, WP:CORPDEPTH. Run-of-the-mill routine news by WP:NEWSORGINDIA are inadequate. Gan Favourite (talk) 14:06, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and India. Gan Favourite (talk) 14:06, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:16, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment this nomination was one of nine made in under 10 minutes, all related to trade unions in Kerala, all with exactly the same cut and paste nomination, all containing the same vague wave at NEWSORGINDIA. None demonstrate any WP:BEFORE, nor show any searching in local language press, although the editor who nominated these appears familiar with Kerala. I'd appreciate if this could be relisted so I can have a chance to search for sourcing - I've addressed four of these nominations (all in my opinion keep), but the time required for each one is longer than I have before this hits the seven day threshold. Thanks and regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 06:01, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:19, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

United Trade Union Congress (Marxist)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails criterias laid down at WP:ORGCRITE. Lacks in-depth coverage, WP:CORPDEPTH. Run-of-the-mill routine news by WP:NEWSORGINDIA are inadequate. Gan Favourite (talk) 14:06, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and India. Gan Favourite (talk) 14:06, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:16, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment this nomination was one of nine made in under 10 minutes, all related to trade unions in Kerala, all with exactly the same cut and paste nomination, all containing the same vague wave at NEWSORGINDIA. None demonstrate any WP:BEFORE, nor show any searching in local language press, although the editor who nominated these appears familiar with Kerala. I'd appreciate if this could be relisted so I can have a chance to search for sourcing - I've addressed four of these nominations (all in my opinion keep), but the time required for each one is longer than I have before this hits the seven day threshold. Thanks and regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 06:00, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:19, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cochin City Motor Thozhilali Union

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails criterias laid down at WP:ORGCRITE. Lacks in-depth coverage, WP:CORPDEPTH. Run-of-the-mill routine news by WP:NEWSORGINDIA are inadequate. Gan Favourite (talk) 14:04, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Transportation, and India. Gan Favourite (talk) 14:04, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:16, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment this nomination was one of nine made in under 10 minutes, all related to trade unions in Kerala, all with exactly the same cut and paste nomination, all containing the same vague wave at NEWSORGINDIA. None demonstrate any WP:BEFORE, nor show any searching in local language press, although the editor who nominated these appears familiar with Kerala. I'd appreciate if this could be relisted so I can have a chance to search for sourcing - I've addressed four of these nominations (all in my opinion keep), but the time required for each one is longer than I have before this hits the seven day threshold. Thanks and regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 06:00, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:19, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noble Compañia de Ballesteros Hijosdalgo de San Felipe y Santiago

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I wasn't able to find significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources. The only reference given in the article is non-independent, as it was written by someone who is described as the "commander" of the confraternity. There are also a few external links (including in the text), none of which establish notability of the subject either. toweli (talk) 13:03, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Organizations, Royalty and nobility, and Spain. toweli (talk) 13:03, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deepak Char

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 12:57, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article have content i think this article should kept or might considered as stub article, look at the sources.[[6]] [[7]] Travis Headache (talk) 14:10, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revirvlkodlaku (talk · contribs) hi, you didn't responded. Travis Headache (talk) 15:53, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Travis Headache, this is a deletion discussion, where the pros and cons of a page are debated. You didn't address me in any manner, so there was nothing for me to respond to. I don't feel like the topic of the article is notable, that's why I nominated it for deletion. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 16:04, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and India. Shellwood (talk) 14:39, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Entertainment, Management, and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:18, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Government Degree College, Nawabshah

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable educational institution. No independent, RS could be found that contain significant coverage of it. I am only able to find routine coverage with many passing mentions. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 12:02, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 12:02, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Education and Schools. Shellwood (talk) 12:41, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Belgian Ringbeater

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot find reliable significant secondary coverage. Only found this: https://www.google.co.nz/books/edition/American_Pigeon_Journal/gadOAAAAYAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&bsq=%22Belgian+Ringbeater%22&dq=%22Belgian+Ringbeater%22&printsec=frontcover (trivial mention) and this: https://www.google.co.nz/books/edition/Encyclopedia_of_Pigeon_Breeds/WECq0AEACAAJ?hl=en although I cannot access the latter to confirm if it actually mentions the breed or not. I'm not aware of any active pigeon fanciers on Wikipedia to ask about this either. Traumnovelle (talk) 09:15, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Traumnovelle (talk) 09:15, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Al Ghardaqa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Total WP:SYNTH/WP:OR - unverifiable (book ISBNs all fail lookup, as do the cited DOIs). Sent to draft, returned by author unchanged other than to remove many of the suspect ISBNs. BTW the book titles themselves fail book search - give the first cited source, "Genealogies of Eastern Arabia: Tracing the Lineages" a try... WP:NOTGENEALOGY very much applies but even if it didn't, this content is dubious and misleading (but also irrelevant) at best. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:41, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Middle East, Saudi Arabia, and United Arab Emirates. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 05:41, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Royalty and nobility-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:49, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. DrKay (talk) 11:11, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously deleted by WP:PROD , ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 08:27, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Red (slur)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnecessary WP:INCDAB. 2 of the 3 entries could be summarized by Red (political adjective), which itself redirects to Red#In politics. Meanwhile, Redskin or Red people aren't listed in Red (disambiguation), so its importance is unclear. I don't really see potential for a WP:BROADCONCEPT article. – sgeureka ^t•c 08:20, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Disambiguations. – sgeureka ^t•c 08:20, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Doesn't seem to be a point to this disambiguation. What's it disambiguating? Nobody would type 'Red (slur)' in, or create a link to this page. They'd just go to Red which should handle the disambiguation, which it does through a link at the top. --Here2rewrite (talk) 12:49, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete MOS:DABSHORT violation. Neither wikt:red nor Republican_Party_(United_States) attests the "Supporter of" part of "Supporter of the Republican Party (United States)", and I question whether it doesn't simply mean just GOP, which is sourced in Republican_Party_(United_States)#Name_and_symbols. Sources can be found for the other two, but usually don't go in a DAB. Also, WP:NOTDICTIONARY. 142.113.140.146 (talk) 13:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saghir Akhtar

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe he does not meet the notability policy for academics.-- فيصل (talk) 07:53, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Academics and educators. فيصل (talk) 07:53, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Medicine, Qatar, England, and North Carolina. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:41, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nasser Abul

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He is not notable at all; it's only his trial that sparked controversy around him. فيصل (talk) 07:44, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Kuwait. فيصل (talk) 07:44, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:43, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of Magic Weekend results

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While the Magic Weekend is special, the results aren't. There is no statistical importance, no link between the results, no extra trophy, ... Basically WP:NOTSTATS, no indication why the results from this weekend are more noteworthy Fram (talk) 07:31, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Rugby league, Lists, and United Kingdom. Fram (talk) 07:31, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Very weak keep A list of stats doesn't really have any impact on readability and this article has the stats placed into the context of Magic Weekend per WP:NOTSTATS. WP:GNG is debatable to whether these stats are notable. Mn1548 (talk) 09:09, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If this article is deleted, a removal of results from Magic Round (NRL) and Summer Bash will be needed. Mn1548 (talk) 09:09, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ibrahim Hendal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see that he meets the notability policy; the sources are scarce. فيصل (talk) 07:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Middle East and Kuwait. فيصل (talk) 07:28, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Nothing concrete to establish notablility, fails GNG -- Robertjamal12 ~🔔 09:39, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:43, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mongolia women's national under-15 football team

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems like a team of children that has no chance of being notable and meeting GNG. Precedent for deleting similar teams, also for boys, mind you, exist at e.g. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Korea national under-14 football team and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malaysia national under-16 futsal team. Geschichte (talk) 06:43, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note. This page was created through a cut-and-paste move from Mongolia girls' national under-15 football team and most of its history is currently there.—Alalch E. 09:04, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Organizations, Football, and Mongolia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:44, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete obviously non-notable ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:31, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for child protection reasons. Speedy delete, even. This constitutes a violation of personal data privacy. Cielquiparle (talk) 12:06, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We have the entire: Category:National under-15 association football teams. There are some funny examples, with the Slovakia national under-15 football team somehow being composed of players that are 27 or 28 years old. —Alalch E. 14:35, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of tallest buildings in Barrie, Ontario

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After a quick Google search, believe this list does not meet WP:NLIST criterion of "discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources", therefore nominating for deletion. Ueutyi (talk) 06:33, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Does not collect buildings that are notable in themselves, the city is not known for having tall buildings, and there is a lot of precedence for deleting this 2000s-early-2010s-type of Wikipedia content. Geschichte (talk) 06:49, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Lists, and Canada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:44, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Newman Post Card Co.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NORG. Part of a walled garden from a now-banned editor who churned out poor-quality articles en masse. The page history shows four of us who essentially agree the article shouldn’t exist, and the PROD was declined on procedural grounds, with no merit-based opposition. WP:BEFORE search came up empty. Courtesy pings @Graywalls, Netherzone, Somebodyidkfkdt, and GB fan: Left guide (talk) 05:24, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I endorsed the PROD, but because of technicality or something, it must now end up here. So, putting in my input. The company does not pass NORG and the redirect target initially chosen by an editor was not a good target. Graywalls (talk) 06:56, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This one's my fault, I thought the target seemed reasonable and I didn't know redirecting would interfere with PROD. Does seem to fail NORG.Somebodyidkfkdt (talk) 10:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:45, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable postcard company, fails WP:NCORP, WP:SIRS and WP:GNG. There does not seem to be an appropriate redirect for this. Source assessment table below. Basically, it's 3 non-independent newsletters and an advertisement in a newspaper. Netherzone (talk) 12:20, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source	Independent?	Reliable?	Significant coverage?	Count source toward GNG?
Source assessment table:
The Branding Iron newsletter	It's a quarterly newsletter for members of a privately owned horse corral organization in Reseda, Calif.	hyper local private newsletter	two sentences	✘ No
Advertisement	An advertisement for postcards or samples thereof	commercial ad placed in a newspaper	not independent; paid for ad	✘ No
Postcard Club newsletter	trade newsletter for local post card club	? Post card club newsletter, probably for collectors of postcards	~ Article is about another company but has an illustrated section for this company	✘ No
Postcard Club newsletter	trade newsletter for local postcard club	? Post card club newsletter	mention that Mr. Newman was a VP of another company; one sentence about the Newman company	✘ No
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Travel and tourism-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 12:34, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Pelister (1340)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Battle is entirely unmentioned in the sources cited. No results for "Battle of Pelister" in google scholar. Golikom (talk) 05:01, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Albania, and Serbia. jlwoodwa (talk) 05:05, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral / weak delete - The source does mention the battle, it's on the first line of page 291. However, other than that, I could not find anything that mentions the battle online in English, Serbian, or Albanian. Ueutyi (talk) 06:38, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Events and North Macedonia. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Albanian–Yugoslav rivalry

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Albania/Albanians and Yugoslavia/Yugoslavs/Serbia/Serbians have engaged in various political and military incidents over the course of the 20th century, for different reasons and circumstances, but there is no such thing as a "Albanian-Yugoslav" rivalry in encyclopedic terms. This isn't football. Entire article is cherrypicked original research and improper synthesis of various events. Griboski (talk) 04:47, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albania and Yugoslavia. jlwoodwa (talk) 05:02, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This page was created to explain the rivalry between Albania and Yugoslavia trough the 20 century. It’s just a page to explain the history between why the two countries hate each other and Why did they engage in different battles and how did it end at the end, it’s a connection between all the different conflict they had in one page, so it’s easier for someone to find them. Randomuser2412 (talk) 05:04, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Giving an overview of broad topics is good, but not every topic is suitable for Wikipedia. We need multiple reliable sources to have discussed this rivalry in-depth – the rivalry itself, not just the individual events that make it up. The best way to argue against this article's deletion is to show us the two or three sources that you think best demonstrate that. jlwoodwa (talk) 05:27, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia guidelines and what constitutes a proper article. Particularly WP:OR and WP:SYNTH. This is not the forum for personal theses. The different events you've collaged are not treated in the single linear manner you've presented them. --Griboski (talk) 05:35, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Military, and Politics. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Potential WP:ATD would be a redirect/merge to Albania–Yugoslavia relations. Curbon7 (talk) 11:31, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Albania–Yugoslavia relations. The article is a POV fork and an oversimplification of the relations between those two countries. StephenMacky1 (talk) 11:41, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As a freshly (!) created POVFORK. gidonb (talk) 12:20, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Prateek Raj

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apart from the obvious undisclosed paid editing by Pinknetwork123, a fairly new account with 20 edits, comes up with a 20000 bytes draft. It was quickly accepted by a reviewer who I believe did not properly evaluate it. At this point, the article was majorly based on primary sources. Interviews, commentaries, and his opinion pieces do not contribute towards GNG. I believe the rest are paid PR articles and there is no significant coverage of Prateek Raj in independent sources. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 04:43, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Economics, Social science, and India. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 04:43, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your comments.

1. Edits are not at all paid. Sorry if they appear to be. Have edited Wikipedia in the past, but usually do without logging in.

2. Subject’s recently published paper got significant media coverage (mentioned in references), which triggered me, an acquaintance, to create the article including all of his previous media coverages.

3. Subject gained salience on D&I issues since activism on hate speech and LGBT issues.

4. Has significant social media following.

5. Have used credible third party sources for all information, from websites and reputed media houses that pass Wiki’s credibility check

6. I defer judgement to editor consensus, thanks. Pinknetwork123 (talk) 09:19, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Jharkhand-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:48, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, while a lot of the sources aren't at par with what I'd expect when looking for WP:BLPRS, I do believe there are atleast three reliable sources that satisfy the bar for notability:
- [8] is a article in The Hindu talks in detail about a paper the individual coauthored.
- [9] is another article in The Hindu that talks about a study he lead.
- [10] is another article in The Telegraph (India) that talks about research that he lead.
- [11] is another article in Indian Express that also talks about his research.

I think the fact that the findings in his research are being covered by newspapers of record and the fact that he holds the position of a assistant professor at IIM Bangalore would sufficiently qualify him to meet WP:NACADEMIC#7. Sohom (talk) 13:13, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I disagree. Many are passing mentions coming from a report released by the Indian Institute of Management. The Hindu article has no byline and the impact of the report is nowhere to be seen. The second Hindu article is authored by a freelance journalist and a study/ report done with 2 others. 3 has some interview bytes and 4 only mentions his name once.

The position of Assistant Professor at IIM Bangalore doesn't carry much weight when evaluating for WP:NACADEMIC. I believe the extensive coverage about the latest report is only because it is related to Karnataka's govt, which i beleive only makes it as routine coverage.

I fail to see Prateek Raj's reports creating substantial impact in terms of citations or otherwise. AFAICS, they fail to meet all eight criterias listed in WP:NACADEMIC. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 14:14, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ji (surname 蓟)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nonnotable surname (only one notable individual with this surname, who probably died 1800 years ago and who has no page on enwiki); material can be merged into Ji (surname). We don't need so many articles with Chinese disambiguators. Yinweiaiqing (talk) 03:10, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:22, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:43, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Li (surname 莉)

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/Li Surname (莉)

Articles for deletion/Li (surname 莉) (2nd nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nonnotable surname (no notable individual with this surname); material can be merged into List of surnames romanized Li. We don't need so many articles with Chinese disambiguators. Yinweiaiqing (talk) 02:35, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:23, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:42, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Li (surname 理)

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/Li Surname (理)

Articles for deletion/Li (surname 理) (2nd nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nonnotable surname (no notable individual with this surname); material can be merged into List of surnames romanized Li. We don't need so many articles with Chinese disambiguators. Yinweiaiqing (talk) 02:28, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:24, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think there's anything here worth merging, since Folk etymologies of Chinese surnames and Surnames in Chinese mythology are both redlinks. I don't have access to any complete biographical dictionaries of Chinese historical figures anymore, but it's telling that the Kangxi entry for 理 as a surname lists only the single individual 理徵, who seems to have been invented or repurposed to make sense of a bit of the Yellow Emperor myth where somehow he was the ultimate progenitor of a dozen different surnames.
The phenomenon of earlyish Chinese families backdating their surnames to mythological and legendary figures to bolster their own reputations — that's an interesting subject and probably deserves better coverage than we currently give it, but just uncritically repeating myths and folk etymologies without contextualising them as such is not what we should be doing here. I'm landing at delete, but also copypaste sourcing to zh:理姓 (unsourced). Folly Mox (talk) 08:39, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 04:41, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Vandenberg

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SPORTCRIT. Only primary sources provided, a search for his name and birth name yielded only namesakes in Google news, books and Australian database Trove. LibStar (talk) 03:41, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Motorsport, Netherlands, and Australia. LibStar (talk) 03:41, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Joël André Ornstein

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was nominated for deletion 11 years ago, with the crux of the rationale being that the sourcing is dubious except for a 1-page article in his college's alumni magazine. 11 years later, that is still the case. Many sources are cited, but if you look at them, they are not actually independent sources about him. Several of them do not even mention him, and seem to be cited as background on his family and industry. The Yahoo one that does look like it might be a business article about him is actually just a press release. The alumni mag article is still the only possibly independent article actually about him, and if you look at it, it's a pretty thin puff piece. You could be generous and assume this is independent, significant coverage... but still, it's the only source that could be said of.

This article has all the hallmarks of paid editing. Created all at once by an account that never edited Wikipedia again, and in 10 years it's only received bot/housekeeping edits, and not a single incoming article link or content edit. But that's what happens when there's no real sources... there's just nothing to legitimately add to Wikipedia. I don't see any sources from various news searches. If a businessperson is never written about in the business press, are they really notable? I don't think so. Here2rewrite (talk)

Delete: Rationale seems reasonable, also could not find sources. Mostly seems to be a person with a good CEO career and a wealthy family. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrfoogles (talk • contribs) 03:16, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Finance, France, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:02, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lo'ay Omran

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 03:04, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Jordan-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 03:04, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 03:04, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 03:04, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pak Chol-min (footballer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 03:01, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Korea-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 03:01, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 03:01, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 03:01, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the 2011 AFC Asian Cup squads#North_Korea - Lâm (talk) 08:15, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per Lâm as ATD. ⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 11:26, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per nom and Lâm Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 13:53, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

High Commission of Sri Lanka, Ottawa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. Article merely confirms it exists with 1 primary source. LibStar (talk) 01:22, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Sri Lanka, and Canada. LibStar (talk) 01:22, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The article is a stub, but notability is also not based on what sources are currently there. Here's *some* coverage (though I'm also not sure whether it needs an article):

https://www.news.lk/news/political-current-affairs/item/36619-high-commission-of-sri-lanka-in-uk-participates-in-bedford-river-festival-2024

Cursory google/duckduckgo/books search finds no sources. Mrfoogles (talk) 03:02, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

REDIRECT to Foreign relations of Sri Lanka. Dan arndt (talk) 03:05, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Foreign relations of Sri Lanka for lack of writeup. gidonb (talk) 06:59, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shomari Figures

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable congressional candidate. Figures is likely to win, but he doesn't currently seem notable based on his current news coverage, which is almost entirely campaign-related and/or passing mentions. I'd support a redirect to 2024 United States House of Representatives elections in Alabama#District 2, and obviously this page can be recreated if/when he wins. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 00:44, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I believe the preponderance of sources satisfy notability. Draftifying would be preferable to deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:49, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the page until if/when he wins, he's not notable yet as he hasn't won an election. Talthiel (talk) 02:46, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, notability is dependent on coverage, not whether people win elections or not. Sources are very good and if the news considers him notable enough to care about, why shouldn't Wikipedia? Mrfoogles (talk) 03:05, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Figures has already won the Democratic 2024 Primary for AL2 and is likely to win in the General election in 2024. 104.129.205.26 (talk) 03:42, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Alabama. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:03, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blind Faith (Gemma Hayes album)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only one news article present on the article, so fails WP:NALBUMS, and a Google search result reveals nothing else aside from maybe one short blog news piece on a site called GoldenPlec. I am nominating this for redirection to Gemma Hayes' main article as I redirected it several weeks ago but an editor restored it. Ss112 00:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Albums and songs, Music, and Ireland. ^Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 00:31, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge, seems like given its size it would fit well in the Gemma Hayes article. Plus the available context would be better. Mrfoogles (talk) 03:07, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draftify or delete. Far WP:TOOSOON. Subject album hasn't even been released yet. Not to mind being the subject of significant coverage. This article appears to have been created (on 16 Jul 2024) a week before the album's launch was even publicly announced/covered (on 22 Jul 2024?). That we are reliant on listings in eCommerce websites (Amazon, goldendiscs.ie, etc) to support even the basic facts is kinda telling. If/when the subject album has actually been released (and reviewed or charted - to the extent that WP:NALBUM can be established) then the article can be recreated. Or the draft moved. Perhaps to be a redirect. As proposed above. Guliolopez (talk) 11:18, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Medwyn Goodall

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This appears to be a vanity page for a musician. While his body of work is extensive, I cannot find any substantial online coverage of him to fulfill WP:BASIC or WP:MUSICBIO. The second reference states that he has topped the UK music charts twice, but this appears to be a fanzine of questionable reliability and I can't find any mention of him at the official chart website. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 08:32, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:46, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've searched the official charts database, and I agree with the nominator, I am unable to find evidence of charting (though potentially it could be so far back in time to not be available online), including under his alternate name. However - there is a WP:RSMUSIC Allmusic staff bio available, which is both non-trivial coverage and confirms gold-certification. Potentially with more verification and coverage this may be a keep. ResonantDis_tortion 13:28, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:46, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Found this Billboard mention that one of his records sold 50,000 copies here, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 21:42, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

HELLO ALL - I am the ARTIST - COMPOSER/recording artist. This page looks as though it was originally created by fans. However I do ask it is NOT deleted WHY >> I am an international award winning artist (instrumental music) 6 gold disc, 1 platinumn and a life achievement award, at least 4 million fans international. I also own a record label managing other artists. A 33yr career. My own radio show also. UK based. Numerous hits. Career is still ongoing. Instrumental music doesnt tend to be found in charts or have the hype of pop music so whilst I am not as trackable you will find me all over itunes, spotify, Amazon, Facebook, youtube, google, as one of the most famous artists of my genre Medwyngoodall (talk) 19:40, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These are the notability guidelines Wikipedia follows for keeping articles on musicians: WP:MUSICBIO. We need reliable sources (WP:RS) to show the article subject meets the criteria. At present it's unlikely there are enough sources, so if you can provide such references that would significantly help. (Note I have been unable to verify the Gold certifications via the British Phonographic Industry website, so help on that would also be useful). ResonantDis_tortion 07:04, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. We need more participation here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:30, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Leaning towards Delete per nom. Not much of a coverage Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 11:32, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. More participation needed.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:19, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. BLP tagged for five years as unsourced. The subject's opinion might influence me if they presented a single source which backed their assertion. BusterD (talk) 02:22, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: passes WP:MUSICBIO by having gold records (according to him, but I assume he's not lying and that sources exist). There is a self-published (but by a company rather than a fan) bio here. I am concerned about the lack of good identifiable sources but if he passes the policy, then it should be kept, right? Mrfoogles (talk) 03:12, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Desmond Murphy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

We don't normally create articles for players playing just 1 first class match. Only primary sources provided. Fails WP:NCRIC. LibStar (talk) 01:11, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Cricket, and Ireland. LibStar (talk) 01:11, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The worst case situation here is a redirect to List of Irish first-class cricketers, with a partial merge to a note so that the biographical details and references can be preserved. Given the quality of information at this source the chances are that there are contemporary press records offline that could be used to build a proper biography. Liddle appears to be the go to expert on Irish cricketers and clearly wrote for the ACS on the subject - a set of his biographies can be found here for future reference. It might be worth a keep based on Liddle's biography and the fact that he got a Wisden obituary (which is not a gimme, especially for single appearance players), but I'd rather see something a bit more contemporary in news sources. But it really is redirect at the worst - this is never a delete situation. Blue Square Thing (talk) 19:54, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:17, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]