User:ResidentAnthropologist

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report No RfXs since 08:57, 27 September 2024 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

Open this if you want to hear a story about the great "Edit War"

In AD 2004, Edit War was beginning. Jimbo_Wales: What Happened? NEUTRALITY: Some set us up the POV Grunt: We Get Talk page. Jimbo_Wales:What? Grunt: Main page down load. Jimbo_Wales: It's You! Mr. Treason: how are you Gentlemen? Mr. Treason: All your Article are belong to us Mr. Treason: You are on the way to Vandalism Jimbo_Wales: What you say? Mr. Treason: You have no chance to Edit protect page Mr. Treason: HA HA HA HA..... Grunt: Jimbo!! Jimbo_Wales: Take off every 'Arbcom'! Jimbo_Wales: You what you are doing? Jimbo_Wales: Elect 'Arbcom'. Jimbo_Wales: for Great Encyclopedia Humorously borrowed from Encyclopedia Dramatica and Zerowing

Let it be known The Resident Anthropologist is really bad at signing his posts --SineBot

tools

Who done it

Compare User pattern

Article stats

Wikichecker

Category:Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests

Template:Db-multiple

Admin abuse

Wikipedia:OWB#37

sandbox

User:ResidentAnthropologist/Sandbox

Some statements about my Wiki-philosophy

I am by Career, Training, and Life an Anthropologist, I make every effort to apply American Anthropological Association's Code of Ethics to my Wikipedia editing.

Thus I believe

1. No Wikipedia Article should dehumanize an Individual or group based on any categorization they maybe considered a part of including, Ethnic, Racial, Religious, Gender, Sexuality, Political affiliation, or Economic status.
2. WP:NPOV includes a duty to properly eliminate language that may reinforce stigmatization on the subject of the article
3. WP:BLPGROUP should be applied to enforce Neutrality in where dehumanization and stigmatization are significant factors in the groups notability.
4. No practice or belief held by a group whether religious, ethnic, cultural or social movement should be misrepresented and be explained in full context of their wider belief systems.
5. Scientific or Academic language or findings must not be misused in articles in ways that may promote bigotry, hatred, or discrimination or other stigma.
6. The Cultural belief system commonly referred to as "Religion" should be respected.
7. Religion may be subject to appropriate critical analysis by recognized authorities, "Critical Analysis" does not include polemical attacks on such beliefs.
8. Infamous individuals deserve a well sourced and neutral BLP free of Coatracking no matter how vile their acts, beliefs or statements

User Boxes

Project Memberships:

This user is a participant in WikiProject New religious movements.

This user is a participant in WikiProject Religion.

This user previously used another account: Weaponbb7.

Userbox Statements:

This user is a native Texan, though does not live in Texas any longer.

This user is a student in the U.S. State of Tennessee.

This user respects the admin position, but wouldn't be an admin if they paid him !

vn-64This user page has been vandalized 64 times.

This user believes the use of alarmist tactics by the Green Movement has obstructed the fulfillment of its original goals.

This user believes in the separation of religion and state.*

This user is interested in religion as a sociological and psychological phenomenon.

PC-0This user is politically incorrect.

This user believes that the borders of African Countries should be redrawn to reflect the nations and tribes of Africa. †

This user supports the Anti-globalization movement.

ANTHThis user's favourite subject is Anthropology.

This user is interested in religion as an anthropological and historical phenomenon.

This user believes that common sense trumps all other arguments.

This user supports the right of anonymous users to edit Wikipedia.

This user boldly assumes consensus when editing Wikipedia until told otherwise.

This user reserves the right to completely screw up his own edits.

NOThis user believes that Flagged Revisions are an abomination that will, if enacted, lead to the end of Wikipedia.

This user believes that anyone who thinks Wikipedia is an unreliable source should continue their quest to find a better website.

AWW DMBJ AWGC AWAI FDSP BATD MTADThis user is a member of the Association of Wikipedians Who Dislike Making Broad Judgments About the Worthiness of a General Category of Article, and Who Are in Favor of the Deletion of Some Particularly Bad Articles, but That Doesn't Mean They Are Deletionists.

User:Sceptre/userboxes/phil

Recognition

Barnstars

		The Resilient Barnstar
		Thank you for being "big enough" to take my comments in the good faith they were offered. Bearian (talk) 19:51, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		Thank you for defending Wikipedia! MONGO 2:03, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Other Recognition

ResidentAnthropologist has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, so I've officially declared today (December 31st 2010) as ResidentAnthropologist's Day! For being a great person and awesome Wikipedian, enjoy being the star of the day, ResidentAnthropologist! Signed, Neutralhomer A record of your Day will always be kept here.

In Case of Emergency

This is a Wikipedia user page.

This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ResidentAnthropologist.

Committed identity: f41ca436a347fe03b632cb52e1507bd07e8fd3f3a1071f0dff7eb87047bba2e851aafb2b71d193317ce2171465f5c04b8d0e327fb590a1f00bf98913d9aba469 is a SHA-512 commitment to this user's real-life identity.