Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
VoABot (talk | contribs)
Bots
29,709 edits
m BOT - Moving/clearing older requests. [PR: 1 | UR: 0 | RfSE: 0 | FR: 1]
Requesting semi-protection of User talk:J.delanoy. (TW)
Line 8: Line 8:
==Current requests for protection==
==Current requests for protection==
{{Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/PRheading}}
{{Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/PRheading}}
==== {{lut|J.delanoy}} ====
'''indefinite semi-protection''' ''Vandalism'', All right, fine. Vandals, you win. To quote Merlin from ''[[The Sword in the Stone]]'', "I've had enough of this nonsense".[[User:J.delanoy|<font color="gold">J.d</font><font color="#00ff00">ela</font><font color="green">noy</font>]][[User Talk:J.delanoy|<sup><font color="red">gabs</font></sup>]][[Wikipedia:Editor review/J.delanoy|<font color="blue">analyze</font>]] 01:02, 5 June 2008 (UTC)



===={{la|Sean Hannity}}====
===={{la|Sean Hannity}}====

Revision as of 01:02, 5 June 2008

"WP:RFP" and "WP:RPP" redirect here. You may also be looking for Wikipedia:Requests for permissions, Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission, or Wikipedia:Random page patrol.
    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.
    Shortcuts

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
    this header: view • edit


    Current requests for protection

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    User talk:J.delanoy (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

    indefinite semi-protection Vandalism, All right, fine. Vandals, you win. To quote Merlin from The Sword in the Stone, "I've had enough of this nonsense".J.delanoygabsanalyze 01:02, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


    semi-protection Vandalism.Kelly hi! 23:15, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of three weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. · AndonicO Engage. 23:17, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    indefinite full protection Vandalism, i would like to have this page protected because "156.34.179.25" is constantly vandalizing. i do have proof because i am a friend of the vandal..Lannymac (talk) 23:06, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. · AndonicO Engage. 23:18, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    temporary full protection Edit War over proposed/yet-to-be-drafted Canadian copyright legislature. Noh Boddy (talk) 22:54, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    semi-protection Persistant vandalism by various anon IPs mentioning NN individuals. Dismas|(talk) 22:47, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    temporary full protection Dispute, Edit War.<3 Tinkleheimer TALK!! 21:54, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    'semi-protection Persistent apparent vandal probably now using more than one IP insists on using "fraud artist" as an occupation against the wishes of other editors.Student7 (talk) 21:30, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. · AndonicO Engage. 23:20, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    indefinite semi-protection Vandalism: Jefferson Davis is a controversial historical figure. New research into his life is not likely, but page defacements by IP users are happening daily. Jclemens (talk) 20:51, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected --Bedford Pray 20:58, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    indefinite semi-protection user request: IPs and new users do not have a valid reason to edit my userpage. This userpage also has a barnstar page and a sandbox for these users. I am requesting, since it was attacked by an IP.Johnny Au (talk) 20:38, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected BencherliteTalk 20:49, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    temporary semi-protection Vandalism, High IP Vandalism: Especially by 142.35.110.171, which I will report..StewieGriffin! • Talk 20:37, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    temporary semi-protection Vandalism, more vandalism since being unprotected.Johnny Au (talk) 20:35, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined There is not enough recent activity to justify protection at this time. Just watchlist and revert any vandalism. Cbrown1023 talk 22:05, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    temporary full protection, vandalism. PrinceOfCanada (talk) 20:02, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Based on PoC's edit that followed this request, I believe it was intended to be for Beatrix of the Netherlands. I've left a note on their talk page. --Onorem♠Dil 20:14, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Confirmed that request was intended to be for Beatrix of the Netherlands article. Request has been changed. --Onorem♠Dil 20:20, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    temporary full protection Dispute, The subject of this article as well as numerous editors have reached the WP:3RR limit reverting WP:COI edits. Requesting protection for a few hours to let things simmer down..Rtphokie (talk) 19:34, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Fully protected Moved up from semi because the account is already autoconfirmed (by any current standard). Please request unprotection below once this is resolved (any admin can unprotect once this is resolved). -Royalguard11(T·R!) 20:35, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    indefinite semi-protection , User Request, Getting Attacked by IP. D=.<3 Tinkleheimer TALK!! 19:14, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    User talk:Gsnguy (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

    full protection User talk of blocked user, profuse unblock abuse (see page logs).The Evil Spartan (talk) 17:58, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Fully protected · AndonicO Engage. 18:24, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism due to a link on the google main page. Over 25 vandalism reverts and over 100 edits so far today. -AndrewDressel (talk) 15:07, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of two weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. · AndonicO Engage. 18:22, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for unprotection

    Shortcuts

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Subtemplates of {{Ordomag}}

    A rewrite of {{ordomag}} has made all of its subtemplates redundant. However, there are still a few other templates which transclude (one of) the subtemplates directly. I request that

    be unprotected. They are no longer a vandalism risk as there are redundant. Unprotecting them would make the task of tidying up the {{ordomag}} template subspace a lot easier once those other templates are moved over to transcluding {{ordomag}} directly. JIMp talk·cont 00:01, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Unprotected - Note: As this is a high-risk template, I will re-protect it as soon as you're done. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:42, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    They are no longer high risk. A rewrite of {{ordomag}} has made them redundant. They can be deleted. JIMp talk·cont 05:50, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for significant edits to a protected page

    Shortcut

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

    This page inadeaquetly explains the parties the parties ideological stance, also it's policies could also be 'fleshed out' somewhat. Please unprotect, at least until these faults can be corrected.

    Declined Protected only 2 days ago, will become unprotected in 5. Any edit requests should be on the talk page with a consensus reached. -Royalguard11(T·R!) 20:28, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    The page contains a highly offensive paragraph, which cannot be substantiated. In addition, the paragraph in question contradicts information from other Wikipedia articles and reliable sources.

    Therefore, I request that the page be unprotected to enable the removal of the offending paragraph. I have explained why the paragraph is offensive under Talk:History_of_Vietnam#Disputed_paragraph. 122.105.151.167 (talk) 12:19, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Done for now; further discussion should go to the talk page link above. PeterSymonds (talk) 12:45, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Fulfilled/denied requests

    temporary semi- protection Vandalism, This page is undergoing heavy vandalism and many RC patrollors will soon be in violation of 3RR if we try to revert the vandalism still further. I suggest a temp semi protect.——Ryan | t • c 16:53, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected by DJ Clayworth (talk · contribs). Reverting vandalism is not subject to 3RR. Revert all you want. - auburnpilot talk 17:52, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


    full protection Vandalism, High risk redirect, BLP concerns, see also WP:ANI#OBAMA_incident. There is a strong consensus supporting this redirect, no need to be edited..Cenarium (talk) 14:40, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Fully protected indefinitely. Hut 8.5 16:36, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    full protection Vandalism, High risk redirect, BLP concerns, see also WP:ANI#OBAMA_incident. There is a strong consensus supporting this redirect, no need to be edited..Cenarium (talk) 14:39, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Fully protected indefinitely. Hut 8.5 16:36, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


    semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism over the past three days. Sin Harvest (talk) 12:28, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. PeterSymonds (talk) 12:31, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism. BigDuncTalk 12:10, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PhilKnight (talk) 12:18, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    semi-protect, constant vandalism since months by different IP's. --D.H (talk) 11:34, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PhilKnight (talk) 12:15, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


    semi-protect from now to after July 14, 2008. Avoid some IP addresses who are using Wikipedia as a advertising website or fan-site to promoted their national beauty queen as a super star with peacock-words, unsourced, violated NPOV.See its History section and compare my version with 64.185.49.205 so you will know the reason why this article must be block for a month. Please block it as soon as possible. Thank you so much.Angelo De La Paz (talk) 09:49, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined - Trouble is coming from a small number of users, please warn and report them. Protection not needed. Stifle (talk) 11:21, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism began again shortly after the recent unprotection. —  X  S  G  08:17, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Stifle (talk) 11:22, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    full protection Dispute, Multiple user edit wars... protection might get people to respond on talk?.ScienceApologist (talk) 05:31, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined unnecessary at this time as you are the able to stop the revert war by not making any further reverts, also noting it would take you and others into WP:3RR territory and there is discussion on the talk page. Gnangarra 11:33, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


    temporary semi-protection Vandalism, Constant vandalism.Nguerrero03 (talk) 09:46, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. CIreland (talk) 10:56, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


    semi-protect. 60+ vandalisms in 19 days since article's creation.Thom (talk) 08:37, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: vandalism made primarily by one user, using newly created accounts; high levels of vandalism to related articles Glasvegas, Go Square Go!, and It's My Own Cheating Heart That Makes Me Cry also.
    Semi-protected for a period of one week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. · AndonicO Engage. 09:08, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    User talk:60.48.215.207 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

    Already protected. · AndonicO Engage. 09:10, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protection IPs are still vandalizing despite explanations in the edit summary. Thank you. --Efe (talk) 08:01, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. PhilKnight (talk) 08:16, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


    User talk:Wannabe Wiki (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)

    indefinite full protection User talk of blocked user.<3 Tinkleheimer TALK!! 07:31, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Declined There is no abuse of the talk page. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) @ 07:33, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    (ec)Any reason why? I don't see unblock abuse, or anything else that would ordinarily require protection. SQLQuery me! 07:35, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Ack, I guess I didn't read it fully. Now I feel bad. Please disregard. :) <3 Tinkleheimer TALK!! 07:43, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    What's even worse is my name is on that list :(. Feeling even horribler (Yes it's a word...that I just made up).<3 Tinkleheimer TALK!! 07:47, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


    semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism. 2/3 times per day. Miguel.mateo (talk) 04:53, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of two days. Tiptoety talk 04:58, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection&oldid=217198760"