Jump to content

Terrorism in China: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
further npov
(21 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
Using this definition, terrorism in China is comparatively rare in recent decades. Many media and scholarly accounts of terrorism in contemporary China focus on violence committed in the name of ethnic separatist movements in [[Xinjiang]] and [[Tibet]], and on the Chinese government's counter-terrorism campaigns in those regions.<ref name=Chung>Chung Chien-peng. [http://se1.isn.ch/serviceengine/Files/ISN/32213/ichaptersection_singledocument/7BC25048-47A9-4C83-8019-BA2DBCC3A17D/en/12_Confronting_Terrorism_Other_Evils.pdf "Confronting Terrorism and Other Evils in China: All Quiet on the Western Front?]. In ''China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly'', Volume 4 Issue 2, pp 75–87. Accessed 2 January 2010.</ref> Some scholars have also characterized political campaigns under [[Mao Zedong]] as a form of [[state terrorism]].<ref name=Martin>Gus Martin, "Understanding Terrorism: Challenges, Perspectives, and Issues," (Sage Publications: 2003), ISBN 978-0-7619-2616-0.</ref><ref name=Ogden>Ogden, Suzanne. [http://books.google.com/books?id=Mij5aWJnAcQC&pg=PA227&lpg=PA227&dq=william+crotty+terrorism+in+china&source=bl&ots=lwvSKuUg7U&sig=UyBMB2z5n23HtoAa-BoQMPM6LhM&hl=en&sa=X&ei=dqJOT47-KIft0gG4jZm-Ag&ved=0CCEQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=william%20crotty%20terrorism%20in%20china&f=false "Inoculation against Terrorism in China"] in William J. Crotty ed. ''Democratic development and political terrorism: the global perspective''. Northeaster, 2005.</ref>
Using this definition, terrorism in China is comparatively rare in recent decades. Many media and scholarly accounts of terrorism in contemporary China focus on violence committed in the name of ethnic separatist movements in [[Xinjiang]] and [[Tibet]], and on the Chinese government's counter-terrorism campaigns in those regions.<ref name=Chung>Chung Chien-peng. [http://se1.isn.ch/serviceengine/Files/ISN/32213/ichaptersection_singledocument/7BC25048-47A9-4C83-8019-BA2DBCC3A17D/en/12_Confronting_Terrorism_Other_Evils.pdf "Confronting Terrorism and Other Evils in China: All Quiet on the Western Front?]. In ''China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly'', Volume 4 Issue 2, pp 75–87. Accessed 2 January 2010.</ref> Some scholars have also characterized political campaigns under [[Mao Zedong]] as a form of [[state terrorism]].<ref name=Martin>Gus Martin, "Understanding Terrorism: Challenges, Perspectives, and Issues," (Sage Publications: 2003), ISBN 978-0-7619-2616-0.</ref><ref name=Ogden>Ogden, Suzanne. [http://books.google.com/books?id=Mij5aWJnAcQC&pg=PA227&lpg=PA227&dq=william+crotty+terrorism+in+china&source=bl&ots=lwvSKuUg7U&sig=UyBMB2z5n23HtoAa-BoQMPM6LhM&hl=en&sa=X&ei=dqJOT47-KIft0gG4jZm-Ag&ved=0CCEQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=william%20crotty%20terrorism%20in%20china&f=false "Inoculation against Terrorism in China"] in William J. Crotty ed. ''Democratic development and political terrorism: the global perspective''. Northeaster, 2005.</ref>


The government of the People's Republic of China considers terrorism to be closely related to ethnic separatism and religious fundamentalism, and has embarked on strike-hard campaigns to suppress these tendencies, particularly in Xinjiang and Tibetan regions.<ref name=Chung/> Since the [[September 11 attacks]] on the World Trade Towers in 2001, the PRC government has strengthened its involvement in multilateral and bilateral counter-terrorism efforts. As a result of these efforts, some [[Uyghur people|Uyghur]] separatist groups have been named as terrorist organizations by the [[United Nations]] and [[U.S. Department of State]]. However, the government of the People's Republic of China has been accused of applying the charge of terrorism in an inconsistent and sometimes politicized manner,<ref name=Wayne/> and of using the label to legitimize human rights abuses against ethnic minorities.<ref name="Amnesty"/>
The government of the People's Republic of China considers terrorism to be closely related to ethnic separatism and religious fundamentalism, and has embarked on strike-hard campaigns to suppress these tendencies, particularly in Xinjiang and Tibetan regions.<ref name=Chung/> Since the [[September 11 attacks]] in 2001, the PRC government has strengthened its involvement in multilateral and bilateral counter-terrorism efforts. As a result of these efforts, some [[Uyghur people|Uyghur]] separatist groups have been named as terrorist organizations by the [[United Nations]] and [[U.S. Department of State]]. However, some scholars and human rights organizations such as [[Amnesty International]] has accused the Chinese government of applying the charge of terrorism in an inconsistent and sometimes politicized manner,<ref name=Wayne/> and using the label to legitimize human rights abuses against ethnic minorities.<ref name="Amnesty"/>


==Chinese cultural context==
==Chinese cultural context==
Line 18: Line 18:
{{Main|East Turkestan independence movement}}
{{Main|East Turkestan independence movement}}
[[File:Xinjiang in China (de-facto).svg|thumb|right|Xinjiang, literally "new frontier," is a provincial-level autonomous region situated in the northwest of the People's Republic of China]]
[[File:Xinjiang in China (de-facto).svg|thumb|right|Xinjiang, literally "new frontier," is a provincial-level autonomous region situated in the northwest of the People's Republic of China]]
Media reports and scholarly studies of terrorism in contemporary China frequently focus on members of the largely Muslim Uyghur ethnic group, who are concentrated in the Northwestern province of Xinjiang.


Media reports and scholarly studies of terrorism in contemporary China frequently focus on members of the largely Muslim Uyghur ethnic group, who are concentrated in the Northwestern province of Xinjiang. After the [[Sino-Soviet split]], the Soviet Union amassed troops on the Russian border with Xinjiang, and bolstered "East Turkestan" separatist movements, which received moral and material support from other regional militant groups.<ref>{{Cite book|title=China's Energy Geopolitics: The Shanghai Cooperation Organization and Central Asia|author=Marketos, Thrassy N.|publisher=Taylor & Francis|year=2009|isbn=9780415456906}}</ref> China accused the Soviets of engineering riots, and improved the military infrastructure there to combat it.<ref name="sssplit">{{Cite book|title=The Sino-Soviet split: Cold War in the communist world|author=Lüthi, Lorenz M.|publisher=Princeton University Press|year=2008|isbn=9780691135908}}</ref>
Throughout their centuries-long history of contact within China, the Uyghurs have resisted assimilation to Han Chinese culture, and identify more closely with the cultures of [[Central Asia]].<ref name=Ogden/> Most Uyghurs desire greater autonomy and political participation, with a smaller number seeking to reestablish an independent state or union with the Turkic-speaking ethnic groups of [[Central Asia]].<ref name=MAR>University of Maryland Minorities at Risk Project, [http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/mar/assessment.asp?groupId=71003 Assessment for Turkmen in China].</ref> The desire for independence largely stems from resentment over restrictions to religious and cultural expression, ethnic conflict with the [[Han Chinese|ethnic Han population]] and income inequality,<ref name=Ogden/><ref name=MAR/> and the perception that the government in Beijing is misallocating Xinjiang’s natural resource wealth.<ref name=Ogden/> Some groups have adopted violent tactics in pursuit of these goals. Groups identified in Chinese government documents as having involvement in violent attacks include the East Turkistan Islamic Movement (ETIM), East Turkistan Liberation Organization (ETLO), United Revolutionary Front of East Turkestan (URFET), and the Uyghur Liberation Organization (ULO).<ref name=EWC/> Members of these groups are believed to have received training in Central Asian nations such as [[Afghanistan]] and [[Pakistan]],<ref name=Martin/>. There are unconfirmed reports (mainly originating from Chinese authorities) of Uyghurs operating within terrorist cells in Central Asia.<ref name=Chung/> However, violence in Xinjiang is not seen as an extension of global Islamic terrorism, nor is it religiously motivated. Instead, it is best understood as part of an indigenous, ethno-nationalistic secessionist movement.<ref name=Ogden/><ref name=EWC/><ref name=Martin/>


According to Ogden, throughout their centuries-long history of contact within China, the Uyghurs have resisted assimilation to Han Chinese culture, and identify more closely with the cultures of [[Central Asia]].<ref name=Ogden/> There is no single Uyghur agenda<ref name="Van Wie Davis">{{cite web|url=http://www.apcss.org/Publications/APCSS--%20Uyghur%20Muslim%20Separatism%20in%20Xinjiang.doc|title=Uyghur Muslim Ethnic Separatism in Xinjiang, China|last=Van Wie Davis|first=Elizabath|publisher=Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies|accessdate=2010-06-28}}</ref>, and while some Uyghurs desire an independent state in line with Turkic ethnic groups of [[Central Asia]], others desire greater political autonomy and participation, while others favor intergration with the Chinese political system.<ref name=MAR>University of Maryland Minorities at Risk Project, [http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/mar/assessment.asp?groupId=71003 Assessment for Turkmen in China].</ref> The desire for independence largely stems from resentment over restrictions to religious and cultural expression, ethnic conflict with the local [[Han Chinese]] population, income inequality,<ref name=Ogden/><ref name=MAR/> and the perception that Beijing's government is misallocating Xinjiang’s natural resource wealth.<ref name=Ogden/> Some groups have adopted violent tactics in pursuit of these goals, and groups identified in Chinese government documents as having involvement in violent attacks include the [[East Turkistan Islamic Movement]] (ETIM), [[East Turkistan Liberation Organization]] (ETLO), United Revolutionary Front of East Turkestan (URFET), and the Uyghur Liberation Organization (ULO).<ref name=EWC/> Members of these groups are believed to have received training in [[Central Asia]]n nations such as [[Afghanistan]] and [[Pakistan]],<ref name=Martin/>. Such violent groups has been noted as frequently splintering, merging, and collapsing, and makes claims which are difficult to substantiate.<ref name="Van Wie Davis"/> In addition, China's Muslim [[Hui people]], who were well intergrated into society, regard Uyghur separatist groups as radical Islamists and unpatriotic, gaving Chinese Muslims a bad name.<ref name="Van Wie Davis"/>
According to Suzanne Ogden, only six incidents in China from 1990 to 2005 meet the strictest definition of terrorism, meaning the use of "random" violence against innocent civilians to cause terror, and excluding calculated violence against the state to advance a secessionist movement.<ref name=Ogden/> Among the events identified by Ogden was an incident on 6 February 1992 when Uyghur separatists (possibly belonging to the East Turkestan Islamic Party) detonated a bomb on a public bus in [[Urumqi]], and a bomb attack on a hotel in [[Kashgar]] on 17 June 1992.<ref name=MAR2>University of Maryland Minorities at Risk Project, [http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/mar/chronology.asp?groupId=71003 “Chronology for Turkmen in China”].</ref> Instances of violence by ethnic Uyghurs against security forces, organs or infrastructure of the state are far more common, but are distinguished by scholars from terrorism aimed against the civilian population.<ref name=Ogden/> Chinese authorities frequently classify any act of violence or separatist activity in Xinjiang as a manifestation of terrorism, even when comparable acts by ethnic Han Chinese would not be classified in this manner.<ref name=Wayne>Martin I. Wayne, “China’s war on terrorism: counter-insurgency, politics, and internal security,” (New York, NY: Routeledge, 2008).</ref>

Ogden notes that violence in Xinjiang is not an extension of global Islamic terrorism, nor is it religiously motivated, but part of an indigenous, ethno-nationalistic secessionist movement.<ref name=Ogden/><ref name=EWC/><ref name=Martin/> Ogden claims that only six incidents in China from 1990 to 2005 meet the strictest definition of terrorism, meaning the use of "random" violence against innocent civilians to cause terror, and excluding calculated violence against the state to advance a secessionist movement.<ref name=Ogden/> Among the events identified by Ogden was an incident on 6 February 1992 when Uyghur separatists (possibly belonging to the East Turkestan Islamic Party) detonated a bomb on a public bus in [[Urumqi]], and a bomb attack on a hotel in [[Kashgar]] on 17 June 1992.<ref name=MAR2>University of Maryland Minorities at Risk Project, [http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/mar/chronology.asp?groupId=71003 “Chronology for Turkmen in China”].</ref> Instances of violence by ethnic Uyghurs against security forces, organs or infrastructure of the state are far more common, but are distinguished by scholars from terrorism aimed against the civilian population.<ref name=Ogden/> According to Martin, Chinese authorities frequently classify any act of violence or separatist activity in Xinjiang as a manifestation of terrorism, while comparable acts by ethnic Han Chinese would not be classified in this manner.<ref name=Wayne>Martin I. Wayne, “China’s war on terrorism: counter-insurgency, politics, and internal security,” (New York, NY: Routeledge, 2008).</ref>


===Tibet===
===Tibet===
[[File:Tibet in China (all claimed).svg|thumb|right|The Tibetan Autonomous Region, highlighted in red, is home to approximately half of the country's ethnic Tibetan population. Many in the region have sought greater autonomy, if not full independence from the People's Republic of China.]]
[[File:Tibet in China (all claimed).svg|thumb|right|The Tibetan Autonomous Region, highlighted in red, is home to approximately half of the country's ethnic Tibetan population.]]
China is home to approximately 4.6 million Tibetans, about half of whom live in the [[Tibetan Autonomous Region]] ("Tibet") and slightly more in the neighboring provinces of [[Qinghai]], [[Yunnan]], [[Gansu]] and [[Sichuan]]. Discontent surrounding the Communist-implemented [[land reform]]s and assimilation policies in Tibetan areas led to a ten-year period of revolt and intermittent warfare, culminating in the [[1959 Tibetan Rebellion]], which led to the flight of the [[14th Dalai Lama]] and some 100,000 other Tibetans to India.<ref name=HRW/> The 1959 uprising was forcibly suppressed, and in its aftermath Chinese authorities imposed radical social reforms and further restrictions to religious freedom.<ref name=HRW/> In 1980, Chinese authorities began reforming earlier repressive policies against ethnic minorities, and granted nominal political autonomy to Tibet.<ref name=HRW/><ref name=Ogden/> The PRC government has invested considerably in the development of the Tibetan economy, education system and infrastructure, but continuing restrictions to religious expression and political participation resulted in ongoing resentment.<ref name=HRW/> Antigovernment unrest in the [[1987-1989 Tibetan unrest|late 1980s]] prompted Chinese authorities to focus more on the economic, educational, and infrastructural development of the region,<ref name=HRW/><ref name=Ogden/> intensify efforts to undermine the religious and political influence of the Dalai Lama, and encourage ethic Han migration to the region.<ref name=HRW/>
China is home to approximately 4.6 million Tibetans, about half of whom live in the [[Tibetan Autonomous Region]] ("Tibet") and slightly more in the neighboring provinces of [[Qinghai]], [[Yunnan]], [[Gansu]] and [[Sichuan]]. According to Ogden, following the flight of the [[14th Dalai Lama]] and some 100,000 Tibetans in the aftermath of the [[1959 Tibetan uprising]], Chinese authorities imposed radical social reforms and further restrictions to religious freedom. However, by 1980, [[Deng Xiaoping]] ascension to leadership and the implementation of the [[Chinese economic reform]] program led to reform of earlier repressive policies against ethnic minorities, and granted nominal political autonomy to Tibet.<ref name=HRW/><ref name=Ogden/> While the Chinese government has invested considerably in the development of the Tibetan economy, education system and infrastructure, the continuing restrictions to religious expression and political participation resulted in resentment amongst the Tibetan populace, leading to the [[1987–1989 Tibetan unrest]].<ref name=HRW/> The unrest prompted Chinese authorities to focus more on the economic, educational, and infrastructural development of the region,<ref name=HRW/><ref name=Ogden/> intensify efforts to undermine the religious and political influence of the Dalai Lama, and encourage ethic Han migration to the region.<ref name=HRW/>

According to Ogden, many [[Tibetan people|Tibetans]] desire greater cultural and political autonomy, if not full independence, and outbreaks of violent clashes with authorities in the region occur only intermittently, such as in the [[2008 Lhasa violence]].<ref name=Ogden/> Ogden credits the low incidence of conventional terrorism in Tibet to an undereducated population, swift and harsh responses to terrorism by the Chinese state, and the pacific influence of Buddhism.<ref name=Ogden/> Nonetheless, there are segments of the Tibetan and Tibetan diasporic population who reject the leadership of the Dalai Lama and view violent opposition as the only viable route towards independence.<ref name=Ogden/><ref>Congressional-Executive Commission on China, [http://www.cecc.gov/pages/annualRpt/annualRpt06/Tibet.php Annual Report 2006 : Tibet], 2006.</ref> Notable instances of violence against civilians include a series of attacks 1996 in the Tibetan capital of [[Lhasa]], and a bombing in a public square in the city of [[Chengdu]] in April 2002, which Chinese authorities allege were carried out by Tibetan separatists.<ref name=Eckholm/><ref name=execution/> Chinese authorities adopt a broad definition of terrorism with respect to Tibet, and have labelled a variety of protests and expressions of opposition as terrorism. In 2012, for instance, authorities referred to the Dalai Lama's prayer sessions for Tibetan self-immolators as "terrorism in disguise." <ref>Tania Branigan, [http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/oct/19/dalai-lama-prayers-tibetans-terrorism ‘Dalai Lama's prayers for Tibetans 'terrorism in disguise', China says’], The Guardian, 19 October 2011.</ref> Authorities have also ascribed terrorist motives to Tibetan exiles who call for independence,<ref>Congressional-Executive Commission on China, [http://www.cecc.gov/pages/annualRpt/annualRpt06/Tibet.php Annual Report 2006 : Tibet], 2006. Quote: “The Chinese government portrays as terrorists some Tibetans living outside of China who call for independence, but has not provided evidence for this designation.”</ref> and to Tibetan monks who travel to India without government authorization.<ref name=CECC2005/>


In 1958, [[Chushi Gangdruk]] ("Four Rivers, Six Ranges"), a Tibetan paramilitary group, was founded by Tibetan exiles with the aim of driving Chinese forces out of Tibet. The group operated from [[Mustang (kingdom)|Mustang]] in northern [[Nepal]], and received covert funding from the [[Central Intelligence Agency]] as well as the [[Kuomintang]] government in the [[Republic of China]]. Until 1960 around 259 Tibetans received arms training in [[Camp Hale]], [[Colorado]], under the guidance of CIA's [[Special Activities Division]]. Their activities ceased after [[1972 Nixon visit to China]] normalized Sino-American relations, leading to the termination of the program by the CIA.<ref>Knaus, John Kenneth. Orphans of the Cold War: America And The Tibetan Struggle For Survival</ref>
Many [[Tibetan people|Tibetans]] desire greater cultural and political autonomy, if not full independence, and outbreaks of violent clashes with authorities in the region occur only intermittently, such as in the [[2008 Lhasa violence]].<ref name=Ogden/> Ogden credits the low incidence of conventional terrorism in Tibet to an undereducated population, swift and harsh responses to terrorism by the Chinese state, and the pacific influence of Buddhism.<ref name=Ogden/> Nonetheless, there are segments of the Tibetan and Tibetan diasporic population who reject the leadership of the Dalai Lama and view violent opposition as the only viable route towards independence.<ref name=Ogden/><ref>Congressional-Executive Commission on China, [http://www.cecc.gov/pages/annualRpt/annualRpt06/Tibet.php Annual Report 2006 : Tibet], 2006.</ref> Notable instances of violence against civilians include a series of attacks 1996 in the Tibetan capital of [[Lhasa]], and a bombing in a public square in the city of [[Chengdu]] in April 2002, which Chinese authorities allege were carried out by Tibetan separatists.<ref name=Eckholm/><ref name=execution/> Chinese authorities adopt a broad definition of terrorism with respect to Tibet, and have labelled a variety of protests and expressions of opposition as terrorism. In 2012, for instance, authorities referred to the Dalai Lama's prayer sessions for Tibetan self-immolators as "terrorism in disguise." <ref>Tania Branigan, [http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/oct/19/dalai-lama-prayers-tibetans-terrorism ‘Dalai Lama's prayers for Tibetans 'terrorism in disguise', China says’], The Guardian, 19 October 2011.</ref> Authorities have also ascribed terrorist motives to Tibetan exiles who call for independence,<ref>Congressional-Executive Commission on China, [http://www.cecc.gov/pages/annualRpt/annualRpt06/Tibet.php Annual Report 2006 : Tibet], 2006. Quote: “The Chinese government portrays as terrorists some Tibetans living outside of China who call for independence, but has not provided evidence for this designation.”</ref> and to Tibetan monks who travel to India without government authorization.<ref name=CECC2005/>


==Terrorism in contemporary China==
==Terrorism in contemporary China==
Line 37: Line 40:


===Organizations designated as terrorists===
===Organizations designated as terrorists===
The [[Ministry of Public Security of the People's Republic of China|Ministry of Public Security]] issued a list of what it considers terrorist organizations on 15 December 2003. These include the [[Eastern Turkestan Islamic Movement]], the [[East Turkestan Liberation Organization]], the [[World Uyghur Congress|World Uyghur Youth Congress]], and the [[East Turkistan Information Center]]. The Ministry further named eleven individuals as terrorists.<ref name=ORGANIZATIONS>
The [[Ministry of Public Security of the People's Republic of China|Ministry of Public Security]] issued a list of what it considers terrorist organizations on 15 December 2003. These include the [[Eastern Turkestan Islamic Movement]], the [[East Turkestan Liberation Organization]], the [[World Uyghur Congress]], and the [[East Turkistan Information Center]]. The Ministry further named eleven individuals as terrorists.<ref name=ORGANIZATIONS>
{{cite web
{{cite web
| url = http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/china/2003/china-031216-pla-daily01.htm
| url = http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/news/china/2003/china-031216-pla-daily01.htm
Line 48: Line 51:
</ref><ref name=BBC2>British Broadcasting Corporation, [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3319575.stm "China issues 'terrorist' list"], 15 December 2003.</ref>
</ref><ref name=BBC2>British Broadcasting Corporation, [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3319575.stm "China issues 'terrorist' list"], 15 December 2003.</ref>


Out of these groups, the ETIM and ETLO were also designated to be terrorist groups by [[Kazakhstan]]<ref name=KAZBAN>[http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2006/11/d927bd44-4aa2-40bf-827d-bf150d77be43.html Uyghur group added to Kazakh terror list] RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty</ref>, [[Kyrgyzstan]]<ref name=KYRGBAN>[http://www.cacianalyst.org/view_article.php?articleid=2020 Islamic groups banned in Kyrgyzstan] Central Asia Caucasus Institute</ref>, and the [[United Nations]]. The [[United States]] refused China's request to designate the ETLO as such in 2003,<ref name="Amnesty"/>, although [[United States Department of State|US State Department]] says the ETLO has engaged "small politically-motivated bombings and armed attacks".<ref name=KAZBAN/>
The World Uyghur Youth Congress and East Turkistan Information Center are both non-government organizations based in Germany which, according to Uyghur groups, mainly serve to report information. Chinese government sources say that The Eastern Turkestan Islamic Movement has carried out over 200 terror operations since 1990, and allege the group has ties to [[al-Qaeda]], though they have not produced evidence to support the claim.<ref name=BBC2/> Chinese authorities have pressured other countries and multilateral organizations to ban the listed organizations as terrorist groups.<ref name=BBC2/>

The Eastern Turkistan Islamic Movement, whose aim is to the establishment of a fundamentalist Muslim state to be called "East Turkistan" and the conversion of all Chinese people to Islam<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.nefafoundation.org/miscellaneous/FeaturedDocs/nefatip0409-3.pdf|first=Shaykh|last=Bashir|title=Why Are We Fighting China?|date=2008-07-01|accessdate=2010-08-07|publisher=[[Nine Eleven Finding Answers Foundation|NEFA Foundation]]|quote=...We are fighting China... China is an enemy who has invaded Muslim countries and occupies Muslim East Turkestan. There is no greater obligation, aside from belief in Allah, than expelling the enemies of Muslims from our countries.... We are fighting China to make them testify that 'there is no God but Allah, Mohammed is the Messenger of Allah' and make them convert to Islam....}}</ref>, operates throughout [[Central Asia]] and claimed responsibility for over 200 acts of [[terrorism]] from 1990 to 2001, resulting in at least 162 deaths and 440 injuries.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4686228/|title=Al-Qaida: Dead or captured|publisher=[[MSNBC]]|date=2005-06-22|accessdate=2010-07-31}}</ref> The group has a close relation with [[al-Qaeda]] and [[Taliban]], having receiving funding and training in Afghanistan. The group was considerable weakened following the [[War in Afghanistan (2001–present)|American-led invasion of Afghanistan]] which saw the death of its leader Hasan Mahsum, as well as Emir Abu Mohammed, who was killed in October 2003 in raid on an [[al-Qaeda]] training camp in [[Waziristan]] by [[Pakistan]]i forces.
<ref name="sf1">{{Cite news|url=http://www.offnews.info/verArticulo.php?contenidoID=11426|title=China: The Evolution of ETIM|publisher=[[Stratfor]]|date=2008-05-13|accessdate=2010-08-07}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|title=East Turkestan Terrorism and the Terrorist Arc: china's Post-9/11 Anti-Terror Strategy|first=Pan|last=Guang|issn=1653-4212|year=2006|month=May|journal=China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly|volume=4|issue=2}}</ref> According to [[Stratfor]], following the death of Mahsum, the group fractured and a successor movement with ties to Central Asian militants was formed in Afghanistan, under the leadership of [[Abdul Haq (ETIP)|Abdul Haq]]. The reformed ETIM issuing several videos including threats to attack the [[2008 Summer Olympics]] in [[Beijing]], although no such large scale attacks took place.<ref name="sf2">{{Cite news|url=www.stratfor.com/analysis/china-etims-direct-threat-olympics|title=China: ETIM's Direct Threat to the Olympics |publisher=[[Stratfor]]|date=2008-07-25|accessdate=2010-07-31}}</ref> Haq was allegedly killed by an US drone strike in Afghanistan in March 2010.<ref name=AlJazeera2010-03-02>
{{cite news
| url=http://english.aljazeera.net/news/asia-pacific/2010/03/2010328195748457.html
| title=Xinjiang fighter 'killed by drone'
| publisher=[[Al Jazeera]]
| date=2010-03-02
| accessdate=2010-03-22
| quote=The leader of a Chinese separatist movement, believed to have links with al-Qaeda, has been killed in a US missile strike, Pakistani and Taliban officials have said.
}}</ref>

ETIM's capabilities and existance as depicted by the Chinese government has raised doubt amongst Uyghur dissident groups; according to Uyghur expert Dru Gladney, the majority of information on ETIM derive from Chinese government sources and lack independent verification,<ref name="csmonitor.com">[http://www.csmonitor.com/World/2009/0424/p06s04-wogn.html/(page)/3 Freed from Guantánamo, a Uighur clings to asylum dreams in Sweden]</ref> while other analysts noted that the ETIM was "obscure but not unknown" before the 9/11 attacks, having been documented for over 20 years by both Chinese and non-Chinese scholars.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The ETIM: China's Islamic Militants and the Global Terrorist Threat|author=Reed, J. Todd|coauthors=Diana Raschke|publisher=[[ABC-CLIO]]|year=2010|pages=14–16, 46–47}}</ref>

Furthermore, Uyghur dissident groups criticized the inclusion of the World Uyghur Congress and East Turkistan Information Center, claming that both groups are non-government organizations based in [[Germany]] which mainly serve to report information.<ref name=BBC2/> Chinese state-media published a statement from terrorism scholar [[Rohan Gunaratna]], who claimed that there are "many sympathizers and supporters" within the the WUC, and noted ETIM's role in "fuelling hatred" between the Han Chinese and Uyghur populace.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2009-07/18/content_8445811.htm|title=Xinjiang riot hits regional anti-terror nerve|agency=[[Xinhua]]|publisher=[[China Daily]]|date=2009-07-18|accessdate=2010-08-01}}</ref>


===Chronology of major events===
===Chronology of major events===
Line 59: Line 77:
! width=64% | Description
! width=64% | Description
|-
|-
| 5 February 1992 || Urumqi, Xinjiang ||[[5 February 1992 Urumqi Bombings]] || Two buses exploded in Urumqi, resulting in at least 3 deaths, and 23 injured.<ref name=EWC>James Millward, [http://www.eastwestcenter.org/fileadmin/stored/pdfs/PS006.pdf "Violent Separatism in Xinjiang:A Critical Assessment"], East-West Center, Foreign Studies 6, 2004.</ref> Unconfirmed reports indicated the attacks were perpetrated by the East Turkestan Islamic Party.<ref name=MAR2/> PRC document say that other bombs were discovered and defused in a local cinema and a residential building.<ref name=EWC/>
| 5 February 1992 || Urumqi, Xinjiang ||[[5 February 1992 Urumqi Bombings]] || Two buses exploded in Urumqi, resulting in at least 3 deaths, and 23 injured.<ref name=EWC>James Millward, [http://www.eastwestcenter.org/fileadmin/stored/pdfs/PS006.pdf "Violent Separatism in Xinjiang:A Critical Assessment"], East-West Center, Foreign Studies 6, 2004.</ref> Unconfirmed reports indicated the attacks were perpetrated by the East Turkestan Islamic Party.<ref name=MAR2/> According to government documents, other bombs were discovered and defused in a local cinema and a residential building.<ref name=EWC/>
|-
|-
| 13 January 1996 || [[Lhasa]], Tibet || || In 1996, there were a series of bombing incidents in [[Lhasa]], capital of China's [[Tibet Autonomous Region]]. Four major attacks were acknowledged, although unofficial sources reported more. The attacks generally targeted and successfully wounded people, while Tibetan bombs in 1995 targeted buildings, such as the [[obelisk]] on the [[China National Highway 109|Qinghai-Tibet highway]].<ref name="TIN1"/> On 13 January, a [[Tibetan Buddhism|Tibetan Buddhist]] monk exploded a [[homemade bomb]] at a shop owned by [[Han Chinese]].<ref name="nyt"/> Five days later on 18 January, the house of [[Sengchen Lobsang Gyaltsen]], the head [[lama]] of the [[Panchen Lama]]'s [[Tashilhunpo Monastery]], was bombed.<ref name="Hilton">{{Cite book|title=The Search for the Panchen Lama|first=Isabel|last=Hilton|publisher=[[W. W. Norton & Company]]|year=2001|page=295}}</ref> Gyaltsen had opposed the [[14th Dalai Lama]] to ordain [[Gyaincain Norbu]] in the [[11th Panchen Lama controversy]]. He was out of his house at the time of the explosion, but a person nearby was "seriously injured", according to the [[South China Morning Post]].<ref name="TIN1">{{Cite news|url=ftp://coombs.anu.edu.au/coombspapers/otherarchives/asian-studies-archives/tibetan-archives/tibet-recent-history/newspaper-sabotage-jan96.txt|title=Tibetan Newspaper Sabotaged; Lama's House Bombed|date=28 January 1996|accessdate=15 January 2011|publisher=TibetInfoNet}}</ref> No group claimed responsibility for the bombings, but China blamed forces loyal to the Dalai Lama.<ref name="Hilton"/> On 18 March, a bomb exploded at the regional government and local [[Communist Party of China|Communist Party]] compound. The government temporarily shut down tourism in Tibet in response.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.tibet.ca/en/newsroom/wtn/archive/old?y=1996&m=3&p=22_1|title=Bomb Explodes outside Lhasa Party Headquarters|date=22 March 1996|accessdate=15 January 2011|publisher=Tibet Information Network}}</ref> China initially denied all of the blasts, but later attributed them to separatists.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Tibet|first=Michael|last=Buckley|publisher=[[Bradt Travel Guides]]|year=2006|page=133}}</ref> The final blast of the year was detonated by remote control at 1:30&nbsp;am on Christmas day, in front of the central Lhasa municipal government offices. Five people were injured, including two [[Watchman (law enforcement)|night watchmen]] and three shopkeepers.<ref name="Poole">{{Cite news|url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/tibetan-activists-set-off-lhasa-bomb-1316482.html|title=Tibetan activists set off Lhasa bomb|first=Teresa|last=Poole|location=Beijing|date=30 December 1996|accessdate=15 January 2011|work=The Independent |location=UK}}</ref> The official [[Radio Tibet]] called the blast "an appalling act of terrorism", and the Chinese government offered a $120,000 reward for the perpetrator. Vice Chairman of the Tibet Autonomous Region [[Gyamco]] called on residents to "heighten our alertness and strengthen preventive measures".<ref name="nyt">{{Cite news|url=http://www.nytimes.com/1996/12/30/world/bomb-at-government-offices-wounds-5-in-tibetan-capital.html|title=Bomb at Government Offices Wounds 5 in Tibetan Capital|date=30 December 1996|accessdate=15 January 2011|work=The New York Times}}</ref>
| 13 January 1996 || [[Lhasa]], Tibet || || Four major attacks were acknowledged, although unofficial sources reported more. The attacks generally targeted and successfully wounded people, whereas earlier bombings targeted buildings, such an obelisk on the [[China National Highway 109|Qinghai-Tibet highway]].<ref name="TIN1"/> On 13 January, a [[Tibetan Buddhism|Tibetan Buddhist]] monk exploded a [[homemade bomb]] at a shop owned by [[Han Chinese]].<ref name="nyt"/> Five days later on 18 January, the house of [[Sengchen Lobsang Gyaltsen]], the head [[lama]] of the [[Panchen Lama]]'s [[Tashilhunpo Monastery]], was bombed.<ref name="Hilton">{{Cite book|title=The Search for the Panchen Lama|first=Isabel|last=Hilton|publisher=[[W. W. Norton & Company]]|year=2001|page=295}}</ref> Gyaltsen had opposed the [[14th Dalai Lama]] to ordain [[Gyaincain Norbu]] in the [[11th Panchen Lama controversy]]. He was out of his house at the time of the explosion, but a person nearby was "seriously injured", according to the [[South China Morning Post]].<ref name="TIN1">{{Cite news|url=ftp://coombs.anu.edu.au/coombspapers/otherarchives/asian-studies-archives/tibetan-archives/tibet-recent-history/newspaper-sabotage-jan96.txt|title=Tibetan Newspaper Sabotaged; Lama's House Bombed|date=28 January 1996|accessdate=15 January 2011|publisher=TibetInfoNet}}</ref> No group claimed responsibility for the bombings, but China blamed forces loyal to the Dalai Lama.<ref name="Hilton"/> On 18 March, a bomb exploded at the regional government and local [[Communist Party of China|Communist Party]] compound. The government temporarily shut down tourism in Tibet in response.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.tibet.ca/en/newsroom/wtn/archive/old?y=1996&m=3&p=22_1|title=Bomb Explodes outside Lhasa Party Headquarters|date=22 March 1996|accessdate=15 January 2011|publisher=Tibet Information Network}}</ref> China initially denied all of the blasts, but later attributed them to separatists.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Tibet|first=Michael|last=Buckley|publisher=[[Bradt Travel Guides]]|year=2006|page=133}}</ref> The final blast of the year was detonated by remote control at 1:30 am on Christmas day, in front of the central Lhasa municipal government offices. Five people were injured, including two [[Watchman (law enforcement)|night watchmen]] and three shopkeepers.<ref name="Poole">{{Cite news|url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/tibetan-activists-set-off-lhasa-bomb-1316482.html|title=Tibetan activists set off Lhasa bomb|first=Teresa|last=Poole|location=Beijing|date=30 December 1996|accessdate=15 January 2011|work=The Independent |location=UK}}</ref> The official [[Radio Tibet]] called the blast "an appalling act of terrorism", and the Chinese government offered a $120,000 reward for the perpetrator. Vice Chairman of the Tibet Autonomous Region [[Gyamco]] called on residents to "heighten our alertness and strengthen preventive measures".<ref name="nyt">{{Cite news|url=http://www.nytimes.com/1996/12/30/world/bomb-at-government-offices-wounds-5-in-tibetan-capital.html|title=Bomb at Government Offices Wounds 5 in Tibetan Capital|date=30 December 1996|accessdate=15 January 2011|work=The New York Times}}</ref>
|-
|-
| 27 February 1997 || Urumqi, Xinjiang || [[Urumqi bus bombs]] || Bombs detonated on three buses in Urumqi, leaving nine dead and 68 seriously wounded.<ref name=EWC/> The Uyghur Liberation Party claims responsibility for the bombings.<ref name=EWC/>
| 27 February 1997 || Urumqi, Xinjiang || [[Urumqi bus bombs]] || Bombs detonated on three buses in Urumqi, leaving nine dead and 68 seriously wounded.<ref name=EWC/> The Uyghur Liberation Party claims responsibility for the bombings.<ref name=EWC/>
|-
|-
| February - April 1998 || Qaghiliq, Xinjiang || || Chinese government sources describe a series of six explosions in February and March aimed at economic and industrial targets. The following month, authorities reported that bombs exploded at homes and offices of local communist party and public security agents.<ref name=EWC/>
| February - April 1998 || Qaghiliq, Xinjiang || || A series of six explosions ocurred in February and March aimed at economic and industrial targets. The following month, authorities reported that bombs exploded at homes and offices of local communist party and public security agents.<ref name=EWC/>
|-
|-
| 16 March 2001 || [[Shijiazhuang]], [[Hebei]] || [[Shijiazhuang bombings]] || Chinese official media reported that 108 civilians were killed when bombs tore through four city blocks in the city of Shijiazhang.<ref>BBC, [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/1226222.stm China says 108 killed in blasts], 17 March 2001.</ref> State-run media said the perpetrator, 41-year-old Jin Ruchao, was motivated by hated of his ex-wife.<ref>People's Daily, [http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200103/25/eng20010325_65914.html Hatred, Revenge Motive for Fatal Shijiazhuang Explosions], 16 March 2001.</ref>
| 16 March 2001 || [[Shijiazhuang]], [[Hebei]] || [[Shijiazhuang bombings]] || 108 civilians were killed when bombs tore through four city blocks in the city of Shijiazhang.<ref>BBC, [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/1226222.stm China says 108 killed in blasts], 17 March 2001.</ref> The perpetrator, 41-year-old Jin Ruchao, was allegedly motivated by hated of his ex-wife.<ref>People's Daily, [http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/200103/25/eng20010325_65914.html Hatred, Revenge Motive for Fatal Shijiazhuang Explosions], 16 March 2001.</ref>
The official story was greeted with skepticism, however;<ref>David Rennie, [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/1328176/Chinese-bomber-went-to-his-targets-by-taxi.html Chinese bomber 'went to his targets by taxi'], The Telegraph, 28 March 2001.</ref> some sources suggested Jin may have been a scapegoat, and that the bombings may have been the work of disgruntled former factory workers frustrated by layoffs.<ref>BBC, [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/1231383.stm China blast reward doubled], 20 March 2001.</ref> The bombings were described in the New York Times as the deadliest mass murder in decades,<ref>John Gittings, [http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001/mar/20/china.johngittings Manhunt for mass killer fails to pacify Chinese], The Guardian, 20 March 2001.</ref> and was characterized by China scholar Andrew Scobell as perhaps the worst terrorist act in the history of the People's Republic of China.<ref name=Wayne/>
The government account was greeted with skepticism, however;<ref>David Rennie, [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/1328176/Chinese-bomber-went-to-his-targets-by-taxi.html Chinese bomber 'went to his targets by taxi'], The Telegraph, 28 March 2001.</ref> and some sources suggested Jin may have been a scapegoat, and that the bombings may have been the work of disgruntled former factory workers frustrated by layoffs.<ref>BBC, [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/1231383.stm China blast reward doubled], 20 March 2001.</ref> The bombings were described in the New York Times as the deadliest mass murder in decades,<ref>John Gittings, [http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001/mar/20/china.johngittings Manhunt for mass killer fails to pacify Chinese], The Guardian, 20 March 2001.</ref> and was characterized by China scholar Andrew Scobell as perhaps the worst terrorist act in the history of the People's Republic of China.<ref name=Wayne/>
|-
|-
| 3 April 2002 || Chengdu, Sichuan || || On 3 April, 2002, a bomb described as a "simple fuse device" detonated in Tianfu Square in Chengdu, the capital of [[Sichuan]] province. According to state-run media reports, one individual was seriously injured, and many others were hurt in the blast. Two men were apprehended: 52-year-old Tibetan religious leader [[Tenzin Deleg Rinpoche]], and 26-year-old Lobsang Dondrub.<ref name=Eckholm>Erik Eckholm, [http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/27/world/china-court-rejects-appeal-of-tibetan-monk-sentenced-to-death-for-separatism.html China Court Rejects Appeal of Tibetan Monk Sentenced to Death for Separatism], New York Times, 27 January 2003.</ref> On 2 December, Rinpoche was given a two-year suspended death sentence for "causing explosions [and] inciting the separation of the state." Dondrub was also sentenced to death, and executed on 26 January 2003. The men maintained their innocence, and international observers expressed concerns over the legality of the trial.<ref name=HRW>Human Rights Watch, [http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/china0204.pdf Trials of a Tibetan Monk: The Case of Tenzin Delek], February 2004, Volume 16, No 1.</ref><ref name=execution>Congressional-Executive Commission on China, [http://www.cecc.gov/pages/news/lobsang.php The Execution of Lobsang Dondrub and the Case Against Tenzin Deleg
The Law, the Courts, and the Debate on Legality].</ref>
| 3 April 2002 || Chengdu, Sichuan || || On 3 April, 2002, a bomb described as a "simple fuse device" detonated in Tianfu Square in Chengdu, the capital of [[Sichuan]] province. According to local media reports, one individual was seriously injured, and many others were hurt in the blast. Two men were apprehended: 52-year-old Tibetan religious leader [[Tenzin Deleg Rinpoche]], and 26-year-old Lobsang Dondrub.<ref name=Eckholm>Erik Eckholm, [http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/27/world/china-court-rejects-appeal-of-tibetan-monk-sentenced-to-death-for-separatism.html China Court Rejects Appeal of Tibetan Monk Sentenced to Death for Separatism], New York Times, 27 January 2003.</ref> On 2 December, Rinpoche was given a two-year suspended death sentence for "causing explosions [and] inciting the separation of the state." Dondrub was also sentenced to death, and executed on 26 January 2003. The men maintained their innocence, and international observers expressed concerns over the legality of the trial.<ref name=HRW>Human Rights Watch, [http://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/china0204.pdf Trials of a Tibetan Monk: The Case of Tenzin Delek], February 2004, Volume 16, No 1.</ref><ref name=execution>Congressional-Executive Commission on China, [http://www.cecc.gov/pages/news/lobsang.php The Execution of Lobsang Dondrub and the Case Against Tenzin Deleg
The Law, the Courts, and the Debate on Legality].</ref>
|-
|-
| 5 January 2007 || Pamirs Plateau, Xinjiang || [[Xinjiang raid]] || Chinese police raided a suspected [[East Turkestan Islamic Movement]] (ETIM) training camp in [[Akto County]] in the Pamirs plateau near the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan.<ref name=DETAILS/> A spokesperson for the Xinjiang [[Public Security Bureau|Public Security Department]] said that 18 terror suspects were killed and 17 captured. The raid also resulted in the death of one Chinese police officer and the injury of another. The [[Public Security Bureau]] said they confiscated hand grenades, guns, and makeshift explosives from the site.<ref name=DETAILS>British Broadcasting Service, [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/6241073.stm China 'anti-terror' raid kills 18], 8 January 2007.</ref>
| 5 January 2007 || Pamirs Plateau, Xinjiang || [[Xinjiang raid]] || Chinese police raided a suspected [[East Turkestan Islamic Movement]] (ETIM) training camp in [[Akto County]] in the Pamirs plateau near the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan.<ref name=DETAILS/> A spokesperson for the Xinjiang [[Public Security Bureau]] said that 18 terror suspects were killed and 17 captured. The raid also resulted in the death of one Chinese police officer and the injury of another. The Bureau said they confiscated hand grenades, guns, and makeshift explosives from the site.<ref name=DETAILS>British Broadcasting Service, [http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/6241073.stm China 'anti-terror' raid kills 18], 8 January 2007.</ref>
|-
|-
| 9 March 2008 || Urumqi, Xinjiang || || On 9 March 2008, China's state-run [[Xinhua News Agency]] reported that authorities had successfully foiled a terrorist attack on a commercial jet.<ref name=Reuters>Ben Blanchard, [http://www.reuters.com/article/2008/03/09/us-china-plane-idUSSP14674820080309 China foils attempted terror attack on flight], Reuters, 9 March 2008.</ref> The Souther China flight departed from Urumqi, and made an emergency landing in [[Lanzhou]] while en route to Beijing. Two individuals were reportedly taken into custody after flight crew discovered flammable material in the plane's toilet.<ref name=Reuters/> Xinjiang Governor Nuer Baikeli told reporters that the perpetrators "attempted to create an air disaster," but authorities provided no further details.<ref>Geoffrey York, [http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080310.wolympic10/BNStory/International/home Olympic terror plot foiled, Beijing says], The Globe and Mail, 10 March 2008.</ref><ref name=cnn090308>[http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/03/09/china.terror/index.html Report: China thwarts two terrorist attacks] CNN</ref>
| 9 March 2008 || Urumqi, Xinjiang || || Authorities had successfully foiled a terrorist attack on a commercial jet.<ref name=Reuters>Ben Blanchard, [http://www.reuters.com/article/2008/03/09/us-china-plane-idUSSP14674820080309 China foils attempted terror attack on flight], Reuters, 9 March 2008.</ref> The Souther China flight departed from Urumqi, and made an emergency landing in [[Lanzhou]] while en route to Beijing. Two individuals were reportedly taken into custody after flight crew discovered flammable material in the plane's toilet.<ref name=Reuters/> Xinjiang Governor Nuer Baikeli told reporters that the perpetrators "attempted to create an air disaster," but authorities provided no further details.<ref>Geoffrey York, [http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080310.wolympic10/BNStory/International/home Olympic terror plot foiled, Beijing says], The Globe and Mail, 10 March 2008.</ref><ref name=cnn090308>[http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/03/09/china.terror/index.html Report: China thwarts two terrorist attacks] CNN</ref>
|-
|-
| 4 August 2008 || [[Kashgar]], Xinjiang || [[2008 Kashgar attack]] || Suspected ETIM militants reportedly drove a truck into a group of approximately 70 jogging policemen. According to official Chinese media accounts, they then got out of the truck wielding machetes, and lobbed grenades at the officers, killing 16 people. Three tourists in the vicinity provided a different account of the event, however, saying that the attackers appeared to be uniformed paramilitary police officers attacking other officers with machetes.<ref name=doubts>Edward Wong, [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/29/world/asia/29iht-29kashgar.16544817.html?pagewanted=1 "Doubt arises in account of an attack in China"], New York Times, 29 September 2008.</ref>
| 4 August 2008 || [[Kashgar]], Xinjiang || [[2008 Kashgar attack]] || Suspected ETIM militants reportedly drove a truck into a group of approximately 70 jogging policemen. According to Chinese media accounts, they then got out of the truck wielding machetes, and lobbed grenades at the officers, killing 16 people. However, three tourists in the vicinity provided a different account of the event, saying that the attackers appeared to be uniformed paramilitary police officers attacking other officers with machetes.<ref name=doubts>Edward Wong, [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/29/world/asia/29iht-29kashgar.16544817.html?pagewanted=1 "Doubt arises in account of an attack in China"], New York Times, 29 September 2008.</ref>
|-
|-
| 10 August 2008 || [[Kuqa County]], Xinjiang || || On 10 August, state-run Xinhua news agency reported that seven men armed with homemade explosives drove taxis into government buildings, in Kuqa, Xinjiang, injuring at least two police officers and a security guard. Five of the assailants were shot and killed.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article4499762.ece|title=China's Uighur rebels switch to suicide bombs|date=11 August 2008|accessdate=22 April 2011|author=Parry, Richard Lloyd|work=The Sunday Times |location=UK}}</ref><ref name="Moore 10">{{Cite news|url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/2533765/China-beefs-up-security-in-Kuqa-after-new-terror-attack.html|title=China beefs up security in Kuqa after new terror attack|first=Malcolm|last=Moore|date=10 August 2008|accessdate=22 April 2010|work=The Daily Telegraph |location=UK|location=Urumqi}}</ref> The attacks began at 2:30&nbsp;am when five assailants drove taxis into the local [[Public security bureau|public security]] and [[State Administration for Industry and Commerce|industry and commerce]] buildings.<ref name="Moore 10"/> The Communist Party chief in Xinjiang called the attack a "terrorist act" and suspected the ETIM was responsible.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.monstersandcritics.com/news/asiapacific/news/article_1422778.php/Blasts_gunfire_kill_at_least_eight_in_Chinas_far_west__2nd_Roundup_|title=Blasts, gunfire kill at least eight in China's far west (2nd roundup)|date=10 August 2008|accessdate=22 April 2010|publisher=[[Deutsche Presse-Agentur]]}}</ref>
| 10 August 2008 || [[Kuqa County]], Xinjiang || || Seven men armed with homemade explosives reportedly drove taxis into government buildings, in Kuqa, Xinjiang, injuring at least two police officers and a security guard. Five of the assailants were shot and killed.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article4499762.ece|title=China's Uighur rebels switch to suicide bombs|date=11 August 2008|accessdate=22 April 2011|author=Parry, Richard Lloyd|work=The Sunday Times |location=UK}}</ref><ref name="Moore 10">{{Cite news|url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/china/2533765/China-beefs-up-security-in-Kuqa-after-new-terror-attack.html|title=China beefs up security in Kuqa after new terror attack|first=Malcolm|last=Moore|date=10 August 2008|accessdate=22 April 2010|work=The Daily Telegraph |location=UK|location=Urumqi}}</ref> The attacks began at 2:30&nbsp;am when five assailants drove taxis into the local [[Public security bureau|public security]] and [[State Administration for Industry and Commerce|industry and commerce]] buildings.<ref name="Moore 10"/> The Communist Party chief in Xinjiang called the attack a "terrorist act" and suspected the ETIM was responsible.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.monstersandcritics.com/news/asiapacific/news/article_1422778.php/Blasts_gunfire_kill_at_least_eight_in_Chinas_far_west__2nd_Roundup_|title=Blasts, gunfire kill at least eight in China's far west (2nd roundup)|date=10 August 2008|accessdate=22 April 2010|publisher=[[Deutsche Presse-Agentur]]}}</ref>
|-
|-
| 12 August 2008 || Yamanya, Xinjiang || || Chinese state-run media reported that three security officers were killed in a stabbing incident in Yamanya, near [[Kashgar]] in Xinjiang.<ref name=AFP>AFP, [http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5iOmVKDAKK1URmlK-Jotptj30YWEQ [Three dead as unrest flares in China's restive Xinjiang], 12 August 2008.</ref> The official media did not specify what the attacker’s affiliations were.<ref name=AFP/>
| 12 August 2008 || Yamanya, Xinjiang || || Three security officers were allegedly killed in a stabbing incident in Yamanya, near [[Kashgar]] in Xinjiang.<ref name=AFP>AFP, [http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5iOmVKDAKK1URmlK-Jotptj30YWEQ [Three dead as unrest flares in China's restive Xinjiang], 12 August 2008.</ref> The report did not specify what the attacker’s affiliations were.<ref name=AFP/>
|-
|-
| 19 August 2010 || [[Aksu, Xinjiang]] || [[2010 Aksu bombing]] || According to state-run media reports, six ethnic Uyghur men were involved in loading a vehicle with explosives and driving into a group of security officers at a highway intersection near Aksu, Xinjiang. Seven people, including two attackers, were killed, according to police spokespersons quoted by state-run media.<ref>David Barboza, [http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/20/world/asia/20china.html?_r=1 Blast Kills 7 in Restive Chinese Region], New York Times, 19 August 2010.</ref> In the wake of the attack, authorities in the region vowed to crack down “relentlessly” on criminal activity.<ref>Reuters, [http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/08/25/idUSTOE67O08I China detains four over attack on Xinjiang police], 25 August 2010.</ref>
| 19 August 2010 || [[Aksu, Xinjiang]] || [[2010 Aksu bombing]] || Six Uyghur men were allegedly involved in loading a vehicle with explosives and driving into a group of security officers at a highway intersection near Aksu, Xinjiang. Seven people, including two attackers, were killed, according to police.<ref>David Barboza, [http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/20/world/asia/20china.html?_r=1 Blast Kills 7 in Restive Chinese Region], New York Times, 19 August 2010.</ref> In the wake of the attack, authorities in the region vowed to crack down "relentlessly" on criminal activity.<ref>Reuters, [http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/08/25/idUSTOE67O08I China detains four over attack on Xinjiang police], 25 August 2010.</ref>
|-
|-
| 18 July 2011 || [[Hotan]], Xinjiang || [[2011 Hotan attack]] || State-run media reported that 18 people died when 18 young [[Uyghur people|Uyghur]] men stormed a police station in the city of Hotan. The men reportedly stabbed a security guard and two female hostages, and killed another security guard with a bomb. The attack ended when security officers shot and killed 14 of the attackers, according to official accounts. Chinese media initially referred to the attackers as rioters or thugs, though subsequent accounts called the event a terrorist attack. <ref name="AP">{{Cite news|url=http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2015665074_apaschinaxinjiang.html China says 14 extremists killed in Xinjiang attack|first=Alexa|last=Olesen|agency=Associated Press|date=19 July 2011|accessdate=29 July 2011}}</ref> The Germany-based World Uyghur Congress provided a different accounts of event, saying that authorities provoked clashes by opening fire on Uyghurs participating in a non-violent protest against heavy-handed security crackdowns in the city.<ref name=AP/><ref>The Economist, http://www.economist.com/node/21524940 “Let them shoot hoops”], 30 July 2011.</ref> The Turkistan Islamic Party later claimed responsibility for the attack.<ref name="be">{{Cite news|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-14834042 Islamic militant group 'behind Xinjiang attacks'|date=8 September 2011|accessdate=8 October 2011|publisher=BBC News}}</ref>
| 18 July 2011 || [[Hotan]], Xinjiang || [[2011 Hotan attack]] || 18 people died when 18 young Uyghur men stormed a police station in the city of Hotan. The men were alleged to have stabbed a security guard and two female hostages, and killed another security guard with a bomb. The attack ended when security officers shot and killed 14 of the attackers. Chinese media initially referred to the attackers as rioters or thugs, though subsequent accounts called the event a terrorist attack. <ref name="AP">{{Cite news|url=http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2015665074_apaschinaxinjiang.html China says 14 extremists killed in Xinjiang attack|first=Alexa|last=Olesen|agency=Associated Press|date=19 July 2011|accessdate=29 July 2011}}</ref> The Germany-based World Uyghur Congress provided a different accounts of event, saying that authorities provoked clashes by opening fire on Uyghurs participating in a non-violent protest against heavy-handed security crackdowns in the city.<ref name=AP/><ref>The Economist, http://www.economist.com/node/21524940 “Let them shoot hoops”], 30 July 2011.</ref> The Turkistan Islamic Party later claimed responsibility for the attack.<ref name="be">{{Cite news|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-14834042 Islamic militant group 'behind Xinjiang attacks'|date=8 September 2011|accessdate=8 October 2011|publisher=BBC News}}</ref>
|-
|-
| 30 - 31 July 2011 || Kashgar, Xinjiang || || At least 18 people died in an series of alleged terrorist attacks in the city of Kashgar. According to state-run media accounts, the violence began when two Uyghur men hijacked a truck, ran it into a crowded street, and started stabbing people, killing six.<ref>BBC, [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-14356532 “China: Unrest in Kashgar, Xinjiang, leaves 15 dead”], 31 July 2011.</ref> The attack ended when the assailants were overpowered by the crowd, which killed one attacker. On the second day, state-run media reported that a “group of armed terrorists” stormed a restaurant, killed the owner and a waiter, and set it ablaze. They then proceeded to indiscriminately kill four more civilians.<ref>Michael Wines, [http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/01/world/asia/01china.html “Deadly Violence Strikes Chinese City Racked by Ethnic Tensions”], New York Times, 31 July 2011.</ref> Armed clashes then reportedly ensured, ending with police capturing or killing the attackers.<ref>{{Cite journal|title=The Bloody Weekend|first=Yongsun|last=Cheng|first2=Xiaodong|last2=Yu|publisher=News China|month=October|year=2011|pages=23–25}}</ref> The Turkistan Islamic Party later claimed responsibility for the attack.<ref name="be"/> One of the suspects appeared in a TIP video training in Pakistan.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/MI22Ad02.html Catch-22 of Xinjiang as a gateway|first=Jacob|last=Zenn|date=2 September 2011|accessdate=9 October 2011|publisher=[[Asia Times]]|location=Kashgar}}</ref> ||
| 30 - 31 July 2011 || Kashgar, Xinjiang || || At least 18 people died in an series of attacks in the city of Kashgar. According to local media accounts, the violence began when two Uyghur men hijacked a truck, ran it into a crowded street, and started stabbing people, killing six.<ref>BBC, [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-14356532 “China: Unrest in Kashgar, Xinjiang, leaves 15 dead”], 31 July 2011.</ref> The attack ended when the assailants were overpowered by the crowd, which killed one attacker. On the second day, it was reported that a "group of armed terrorists" stormed a restaurant, killed the owner and a waiter, and set it ablaze. They then proceeded to indiscriminately kill four more civilians.<ref>Michael Wines, [http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/01/world/asia/01china.html “Deadly Violence Strikes Chinese City Racked by Ethnic Tensions”], New York Times, 31 July 2011.</ref> Armed clashes then reportedly ensured, ending with police capturing or killing the attackers.<ref>{{Cite journal|title=The Bloody Weekend|first=Yongsun|last=Cheng|first2=Xiaodong|last2=Yu|publisher=News China|month=October|year=2011|pages=23–25}}</ref> The Turkistan Islamic Party later claimed responsibility for the attack.<ref name="be"/> One of the suspects appeared in a TIP video training in Pakistan.<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/MI22Ad02.html Catch-22 of Xinjiang as a gateway|first=Jacob|last=Zenn|date=2 September 2011|accessdate=9 October 2011|publisher=[[Asia Times]]|location=Kashgar}}</ref> ||
|}
|}


==Counter-terrorism==
==Counter-terrorism==
===Domestic counter-terrorism===
===Domestic counter-terrorism===
{{One source|section|date=May 2012}}
[[File:Military of Tibet.jpg|thumb|right|A soldier on patrol Lhasa, Tibet. Chinese authorities have launched "strike-hard" campaigns targeting unsanctioned religious activity and separatism.]]
[[File:Military of Tibet.jpg|thumb|right|A soldier on patrol Lhasa, Tibet. Chinese authorities have launched "strike-hard" campaigns targeting unsanctioned religious activity and separatism.]]
Following a spate of unrest and violence in the Western autonomous regions of Xinjiang and Tibet in the late 1980s and early 1990s, Chinese authorities adopted a variety of approach to suppress what it considers the "three evils": terrorism, separatism, and religious fundamentalism. The government of the People's Republic of China considers these to be interconnected threats to its authorities, all of which "threaten to displace the state as an object of adulation," according to Chien-peng Chung.<ref name=Chung/> The government promoted economic development through investments in infrastructure, tourism, and capital investment to spur growth, and encouraged ethnic Han migration into the western regions.<ref name=Chung/> In addition, authorities launched "strike hard" campaigns against crime, which also had the effect of targeting expressions of separatism and unauthorized religious practice.<ref name=Chung/>


A "strike hard" campaign which began in Tibet and Xinjiang in 1997 involved tightly controlling religious activities and festivals. In Tibet, authorities sought to curtail the influence of the Dalai Lama by banning all displayed of his image. In 1995, authorities replaced his choice of the number two [[Panchen Lama]] with a Beijing-approved candidate.<ref name=Chung/> In Xinjiang, authorities placed restrictions on unofficial religious practice, and closely monitored Muslims returning from [[madrassah]] schools overseas.<ref name=Chung/> In addition to cracking down on unregistered religiosity, the government aimed to promote economic development through investments in infrastructure, tourism, and capital investment, and encouraging ethnic Han migration to the regions. Authorities have allowed for a gradual expansion of individual freedoms in many spheres, all the while maintaining strict control over religious, cultural, and literary associations of ethnic minorities in Xinjiang and Tibet.<ref name=Chung/>
According to politics professor Chien-peng Chung, following a spate of unrest and violence in Xinjiang and Tibet in the late 1980s and early 1990s, Chinese authorities adopted a variety of approach to suppress what it considers the "three evils": terrorism, separatism, and religious fundamentalism, which the government considers to be interconnected threats to its authorities.<ref name=Chung/> To combat these, the government promoted economic development through investments in infrastructure, tourism, and capital investment to spur growth, and encouraged ethnic Han migration into the western regions. In addition, authorities launched "strike hard" campaigns against crime, which also had the effect of targeting expressions of separatism and unauthorized religious practice.<ref name=Chung/>

[[File:Urumqi.jpg|thumb|left|The skyline of Urumqi, Xinjiang. Chinese authorities have invested considerably in the economy and infrastructure of the province, and encouraged large-scale migration of ethnic Han Chinese into Xinjiang and Tibet.]]
Chien noted that in recent years, Chinese authorities have allowed for a gradual expansion of individual freedoms in many spheres, all the while maintaining strict control over religious, cultural, and literary associations of ethnic minorities in Xinjiang and Tibet.<ref name=Chung/>
In 1997, a "strike hard" campaign began in Tibet and Xinjiang involving in tightly controlling religious activities and festivals. In Tibet, authorities sought to curtail the influence of the Dalai Lama by banning all displays of his image, and in 1995, authorities replaced his choice of the number two [[Panchen Lama]] with a Beijing-approved candidate.<ref name=Chung/> In Xinjiang, authorities placed restrictions on unofficial religious practices, and closely monitored Muslims returning from [[madrasah]] schools overseas.<ref name=Chung/> Following the September 11 attacks, such schools were perceived as hotbeds of religious extremism and anti-Western sentiments.<ref name=YG20070621>{{cite web
|first=Susan
|last=Moeller
|title=Jumping on the US Bandwagon for a "War on Terror"
|date=2007-06-21
|url=http://yaleglobal.yale.edu/display.article?id=9324
|work=[[YaleGlobal Online]]
|publisher=Yale Center for the Study of Globalization}}</ref>

Chien also noted that corresponding to the launch of strike-hard campaigns and economic stimulus efforts, there was a apparent decrease in the level of organized violent protest or bombings in the Western autonomous regions. Whereas levels of anti-government violence were high from 1987-1997, reported instances were virtually non-existent in the several years that followed.<ref name=Chung/> In the aftermath of the strike-hard campaigns, Tibetan and Uyghur dissident groups overseas have adjusted their strategies in promoting their causes: as of 1998 the Dalai Lama has no longer called for outright Tibetan independence, and Uyghur groups have become more adept in framing their cause as one of human rights and free elections. Chien noted that while instances of violent organized protest and bombings have decreased, heightened tensions between local ethnic groups and the Han Chinese who have migrated into Xinjiang and Tibet en masse since the 1990s.<ref name=Chung/> According to Chien, in terms of public relations and reporting incidences of violence, local authorities are encouraged to take accounts of foreign investments so that they would not be discouraged by violence, but at the same time, authorities needed justifications to initiate actions against separatist groups.<ref name=Chung/>


===International relations===
As noted by Chien-peng Chung, there was a apparent decrease in the level of organized violent protest or bombings in the Western autonomous regions that corresponded to the launch of strike-hard campaigns and economic stimulus efforts; whereas levels of anti-government violence were high from 1987-1997, reported instances were virtually non-existent in the several years that followed.<ref name=Chung/> In the aftermath of the strike-hard campaigns, Tibetan and Uyghur émigré communities have adjusted their strategies in presenting their causes: as of 1998 the Dalai Lama has no longer called for outright Tibetan independence, and Uyghur groups have become more adept in framing their cause as one of human rights and free elections. However, while instances of violent organized protest and bombings have decreased, Chung notes heightened tensions between local ethnic groups and ethnic Han, who have migrated into Xinjiang and Tibet en masse since the 1990s.<ref name=Chung/> In terms of public relations, authorities are engaged in a "fine balance" between exaggerating and downplaying instances of violence. According to Chung, "playing up the issue would discourage foreign trade and investments in Xinjiang or Tibet, but playing it down would deprive the authorities of excuses to initiate actions against separatists and religious radicals."<ref name=Chung/>
The government of the People’s Republic of China has engaged in cooperation at the bilateral and multilateral level to gain support for its efforts to combat terrorism and ethnic separatism. This has increased following the [[September 11 attacks]] in the [[United States]], which led to the global [[War on Terror]].


Much of this cooperation involves the [[Shanghai Cooperation Organisation]], which includes several [[Central Asia]]n states, home to large ethnic Uyghur populations. The Chinese government has periodically requested that authorities in [[Kyrgyzstan]] and [[Kazakhstan]] crack down on Uyghur secessionists<ref name=Chung/>, and that they extradite suspected terrorists and separatists to China.<ref>Graham Fuller and Jonathan Lipman, “Islam in Xinjiang,” in S. Frederick Starr Ed. Xinjiang: China’s Muslim Borderland (ME Sharpe, 2004).</ref> The Government of Kazakhstan has consistently extradited Uyghur terrorist suspects to China<ref name=RELTHRET>
===International cooperation===
[http://www.jamestown.org/publications_details.php?volume_id=414&issue_id=3718&article_id=2371063 Kazakhstan exacerbates "religious threat" by maneuvering between Beijing and Washington] Jamestown Foundation</ref> and in 2006 participated in a large-scale, joint counter-terrorism drill.<ref name=PIPELINE>[http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1070801.html China/Kazakhstan: Forces Hold First-Ever Joint Terrorism Exercises] Radio Free Europe </ref>
The government of the People’s Republic of China has, particularly since 2001, engaged in cooperation at the bilateral and multilateral level to gain support for its efforts to combat terrorism and ethnic separatism.


The Chinese and Kyrgyz governments increased security along their borders with each other and [[Tajikistan]] in January 2007 after Chinese government officials expressed concern that alleged international terrorists were traveling through [[Xinjiang]] and Central Asia to carry out attacks. The warning followed a high-profile [[Xinjiang raid (January 2007)|raid on a training camp]] in [[Akto County]], [[Xinjiang]] run by suspected [[East Turkestan Islamic Movement]] members.<ref name=INFILTRATION>[http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1073946.html China: Border security tightened amid 'terrorist infiltration' warning] Radio Free Europe </ref>
Much of this cooperation involves the Central Asian states, which are home to large ethnic Uyghur populations. The government has periodically demanded that authorities in [[Kyrgyzstan]] and [[Kazakhstan]] crack down on Uyghur secessionists<ref name=Chung/>, and that they extradite suspected terrorists and separatists to China.<ref>Graham Fuller and Jonathan Lipman, “Islam in Xinjiang,” in S. Frederick Starr Ed. Xinjiang: China’s Muslim Borderland (ME Sharpe, 2004).</ref> The Government of Kazakhstan has consistently extradited Uyghur terrorist suspects to China<ref name=RELTHRET>
[http://www.jamestown.org/publications_details.php?volume_id=414&issue_id=3718&article_id=2371063 Kazakhstan exacerbates "religious threat" by maneuvering between Beijing and Washington] Jamestown Foundation</ref> and in 2006 participated in a large-scale, joint counter-terrorism drill.<ref name=PIPELINE>[http://uyghuramerican.org/articles/468/1/Kazakstan-Joins-China-on-Counter-Terror-Exercise/Kazakstan-Joins-China-on-Counter-Terror-Exercise.html Kazakstan Joins China on Counter-Terror Exercise] Uyghur American Association
</ref>


In 2006, American forces [[Uyghur detainees at Guantanamo Bay|captured 22 Uyghur militants]] from combat zones in [[Afghanistan]] and [[Pakistan]] in 2006 on information that they were linked to [[Al-Qaeda]].<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.cfr.org/publication/9179/east_turkestan_islamic_movement_etim.html|title=The East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM)|work=Backgrounder|publisher=[[Council on Foreign Relations]]|first=Holly|last=Fletcher|first2=Jayshree|last2=Bajoria|date=2008-07-31|accessdate=2010-07-31}}</ref> They were imprisoned for five to seven years in [[Guantanamo Bay]], where they testified that they were trained by ETIM leader Abdul Haq, at an ETIM training camp. After being reclassified as [[No Longer Enemy Combatant]], a panel of judges ordered them released into the United States, as they could not be released back to China because of [[human rights in the People's Republic of China|human rights concerns]].<ref>{{Cite news|url=http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=7423474|title=Guantanamo Uyghur Detainees: Coming to America?|first=Ariane|last=de Vogue|first2=Dennis|last2=Powell|first3=Jason|last3=Ryan|publisher=[[ABC News]]|date=2009-04-24|accessdate=2010-07-31}}</ref> A Chinese government spokesman denounced the move as a violation of international law and demanded the return of the men to China.
The Chinese and Kyrgyz governments increased security along their borders with each other and [[Tajikistan]] in January 2007 after Chinese government officials expressed concern that "international terrorists" were traveling through [[Xinjiang]] and Central Asia to carry out attacks. The warning followed a high-profile [[Xinjiang raid (January 2007)|raid on a training camp]] in [[Akto County]], [[Xinjiang]] run by suspected [[East Turkestan Islamic Movement]] members.<ref name=INFILTRATION>[http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2007/1/28BAA744-5A99-4808-9786-1B13057289FC.html China: Border security tightened amid 'terrorist infiltration' warning] RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty
</ref>


==See also==
==See also==
Line 118: Line 145:


==External links==
==External links==
* [http://www.nautilus.org/napsnet/dr/index.html NAPSNet Daily Report] Northeast Asia Peace and Security Network
* [http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/02/01/news/china.php Senior Chinese official issues Bush rebuke]
* [http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/02/01/news/china.php Senior Chinese official issues Bush rebuke]
* [http://www.southasiaanalysis.org/papers13/paper1232.html Explosions in Xinjiang]
* [http://216.109.125.130/search/cache?p=Hasan+Mahsum&toggle=1&ei=UTF-8&fr=yfp-t-501&u=www.observerindia.com/analysis/A084.htm&w=hasan+mahsum&d=As-YREVuN2Yn&icp=1&.intl=us China's terror list and its implications]
* [http://www.saag.org/papers13/paper1232.html Explosions in Xinjiang]
* [http://www.dailynews.lk/2002/05/29/wor06.html Pakistan hands over Muslim separatist leader-China]
* [http://www.dailynews.lk/2002/05/29/wor06.html Pakistan hands over Muslim separatist leader-China]
* [http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/IB27Ad01.html Al-Qaeda's China problem]
* [http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/IB27Ad01.html Al-Qaeda's China problem]
* [http://www.jamestown.org/publications_details.php?volume_id=395&issue_id=2935&article_id=236613 China's Post 9/11 Terrorism Strategy]
* [http://www.jamestown.org/single/?no_cache=1&tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=3645 China's Post 9/11 Terrorism Strategy]
* [http://www.ndu.edu/inss/Press/jfq_pages/editions/i47/09.pdf Five Lessons from China's War on Terror]
* [http://intelros.ru/pdf/jfq_11_09.pdf Five Lessons from China's War on Terror]
* [http://se2.isn.ch/serviceengine/FileContent?serviceID=10&fileid=AAA225BA-E5A6-BBEB-2092-0AB5C081E917&lng=en Violent Separatism in Xinjiang]
* [http://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10125/3502 Violent Separatism in Xinjiang]
* [http://www.apcss.org/Publications/APCSS--%20Uyghur%20Muslim%20Separatism%20in%20Xinjiang.doc Uyghur Muslim Ethnic Separatism in Xinjiang, China]


{{China national security}}
{{China national security}}

Revision as of 12:38, 14 May 2012

Terrorism in the People's Republic of China is a topic of some contention. The definition of terrorism differs among scholars, between international and national bodies, and across time. In the cultural setting of China, the term is relatively new and ambiguously defined.[1]A common definition of terrorism is the systematic use or threatened use of violence to intimidate a population or government and thereby effect political, religious, or ideological change.[2][3]

Using this definition, terrorism in China is comparatively rare in recent decades. Many media and scholarly accounts of terrorism in contemporary China focus on violence committed in the name of ethnic separatist movements in Xinjiang and Tibet, and on the Chinese government's counter-terrorism campaigns in those regions.[4] Some scholars have also characterized political campaigns under Mao Zedong as a form of state terrorism.[5][6]

The government of the People's Republic of China considers terrorism to be closely related to ethnic separatism and religious fundamentalism, and has embarked on strike-hard campaigns to suppress these tendencies, particularly in Xinjiang and Tibetan regions.[4] Since the September 11 attacks in 2001, the PRC government has strengthened its involvement in multilateral and bilateral counter-terrorism efforts. As a result of these efforts, some Uyghur separatist groups have been named as terrorist organizations by the United Nations and U.S. Department of State. However, some scholars and human rights organizations such as Amnesty International has accused the Chinese government of applying the charge of terrorism in an inconsistent and sometimes politicized manner,[7] and using the label to legitimize human rights abuses against ethnic minorities.[8]

Chinese cultural context

The concept of terrorism, as it evolved and is understood in the West, did not exist in imperial China. In that setting, political criminality took the form as violence against the emperor, and was viewed as harmful insofar as it induced fear and caused “chaos.”[1] With the exception of “good” political violence against rulers whose lack of propriety and virtue resulted in loss of the mandate of heaven, violence was seen as contrary to human nature and the Tao.[1] Kam Wong argues that the dynamics of imperial China form the basis for contemporary Chinese understandings of terrorism.[1]

Fear of chaos and social disorder is a powerful factor in mobilizing political will to combat potential threats.[6][7] In the modern context, any group or force with the potential to challenge the existing social order or the political security of the rulers may be considered a form of terrorism, “to be condemned unrelentingly and suppressed at all costs.”[1]

There is currently no clearly established definition for terrorism either nationally or internationally,[8] though the National People's Congress is in the process of drafting legislation that would clarify the use of the term in Chinese law. The draft legislation, as reported by Xinhua News Agency, classified as terrorism acts that "cause or aim to cause severe harm to society by causing casualties, bringing about major economic losses, damaging public facilities or disturbing social order."[9] Human rights groups charge that the term is sometimes applied to non-violent dissidents in China.[8][10]

Ethnic Separatism

Xinjiang

Xinjiang, literally "new frontier," is a provincial-level autonomous region situated in the northwest of the People's Republic of China

Media reports and scholarly studies of terrorism in contemporary China frequently focus on members of the largely Muslim Uyghur ethnic group, who are concentrated in the Northwestern province of Xinjiang. After the Sino-Soviet split, the Soviet Union amassed troops on the Russian border with Xinjiang, and bolstered "East Turkestan" separatist movements, which received moral and material support from other regional militant groups.[11] China accused the Soviets of engineering riots, and improved the military infrastructure there to combat it.[12]

According to Ogden, throughout their centuries-long history of contact within China, the Uyghurs have resisted assimilation to Han Chinese culture, and identify more closely with the cultures of Central Asia.[6] There is no single Uyghur agenda[13], and while some Uyghurs desire an independent state in line with Turkic ethnic groups of Central Asia, others desire greater political autonomy and participation, while others favor intergration with the Chinese political system.[14] The desire for independence largely stems from resentment over restrictions to religious and cultural expression, ethnic conflict with the local Han Chinese population, income inequality,[6][14] and the perception that Beijing's government is misallocating Xinjiang’s natural resource wealth.[6] Some groups have adopted violent tactics in pursuit of these goals, and groups identified in Chinese government documents as having involvement in violent attacks include the East Turkistan Islamic Movement (ETIM), East Turkistan Liberation Organization (ETLO), United Revolutionary Front of East Turkestan (URFET), and the Uyghur Liberation Organization (ULO).[15] Members of these groups are believed to have received training in Central Asian nations such as Afghanistan and Pakistan,[5]. Such violent groups has been noted as frequently splintering, merging, and collapsing, and makes claims which are difficult to substantiate.[13] In addition, China's Muslim Hui people, who were well intergrated into society, regard Uyghur separatist groups as radical Islamists and unpatriotic, gaving Chinese Muslims a bad name.[13]

Ogden notes that violence in Xinjiang is not an extension of global Islamic terrorism, nor is it religiously motivated, but part of an indigenous, ethno-nationalistic secessionist movement.[6][15][5] Ogden claims that only six incidents in China from 1990 to 2005 meet the strictest definition of terrorism, meaning the use of "random" violence against innocent civilians to cause terror, and excluding calculated violence against the state to advance a secessionist movement.[6] Among the events identified by Ogden was an incident on 6 February 1992 when Uyghur separatists (possibly belonging to the East Turkestan Islamic Party) detonated a bomb on a public bus in Urumqi, and a bomb attack on a hotel in Kashgar on 17 June 1992.[16] Instances of violence by ethnic Uyghurs against security forces, organs or infrastructure of the state are far more common, but are distinguished by scholars from terrorism aimed against the civilian population.[6] According to Martin, Chinese authorities frequently classify any act of violence or separatist activity in Xinjiang as a manifestation of terrorism, while comparable acts by ethnic Han Chinese would not be classified in this manner.[7]

Tibet

The Tibetan Autonomous Region, highlighted in red, is home to approximately half of the country's ethnic Tibetan population.

China is home to approximately 4.6 million Tibetans, about half of whom live in the Tibetan Autonomous Region ("Tibet") and slightly more in the neighboring provinces of Qinghai, Yunnan, Gansu and Sichuan. According to Ogden, following the flight of the 14th Dalai Lama and some 100,000 Tibetans in the aftermath of the 1959 Tibetan uprising, Chinese authorities imposed radical social reforms and further restrictions to religious freedom. However, by 1980, Deng Xiaoping ascension to leadership and the implementation of the Chinese economic reform program led to reform of earlier repressive policies against ethnic minorities, and granted nominal political autonomy to Tibet.[17][6] While the Chinese government has invested considerably in the development of the Tibetan economy, education system and infrastructure, the continuing restrictions to religious expression and political participation resulted in resentment amongst the Tibetan populace, leading to the 1987–1989 Tibetan unrest.[17] The unrest prompted Chinese authorities to focus more on the economic, educational, and infrastructural development of the region,[17][6] intensify efforts to undermine the religious and political influence of the Dalai Lama, and encourage ethic Han migration to the region.[17]

According to Ogden, many Tibetans desire greater cultural and political autonomy, if not full independence, and outbreaks of violent clashes with authorities in the region occur only intermittently, such as in the 2008 Lhasa violence.[6] Ogden credits the low incidence of conventional terrorism in Tibet to an undereducated population, swift and harsh responses to terrorism by the Chinese state, and the pacific influence of Buddhism.[6] Nonetheless, there are segments of the Tibetan and Tibetan diasporic population who reject the leadership of the Dalai Lama and view violent opposition as the only viable route towards independence.[6][18] Notable instances of violence against civilians include a series of attacks 1996 in the Tibetan capital of Lhasa, and a bombing in a public square in the city of Chengdu in April 2002, which Chinese authorities allege were carried out by Tibetan separatists.[19][20] Chinese authorities adopt a broad definition of terrorism with respect to Tibet, and have labelled a variety of protests and expressions of opposition as terrorism. In 2012, for instance, authorities referred to the Dalai Lama's prayer sessions for Tibetan self-immolators as "terrorism in disguise." [21] Authorities have also ascribed terrorist motives to Tibetan exiles who call for independence,[22] and to Tibetan monks who travel to India without government authorization.[10]

In 1958, Chushi Gangdruk ("Four Rivers, Six Ranges"), a Tibetan paramilitary group, was founded by Tibetan exiles with the aim of driving Chinese forces out of Tibet. The group operated from Mustang in northern Nepal, and received covert funding from the Central Intelligence Agency as well as the Kuomintang government in the Republic of China. Until 1960 around 259 Tibetans received arms training in Camp Hale, Colorado, under the guidance of CIA's Special Activities Division. Their activities ceased after 1972 Nixon visit to China normalized Sino-American relations, leading to the termination of the program by the CIA.[23]

Terrorism in contemporary China

Under China's criminal law, acts of terrorism can carry a prison sentence of up to ten years. Since 2001, over 7,000 Chinese citizens have been convicted on terrorism charges.[24] However, the law does not clearly define what constitutes a terrorist organization or activity. In October 2011, Chinese authorities began crafting a bill that would more clearly define terrorism.[9] According to the state-run Xinhua News Agency, the draft bill defines terrorist acts as those that are intended "induce public fear or to coerce state organs or international organisations by means of violence, sabotage, threats or other tactics...These acts cause or aim to cause severe harm to society by causing casualties, bringing about major economic losses, damaging public facilities or disturbing social order."[9] The government of the People's Republic of China identifies terrorism as one of "Three Evils" which also include separatism and religious fundamentalism.[4] These forces are seen by Beijing as inter-connected threats to social stability and national security. In particular, terrorism is viewed as a violent manifestation of ethnic separatism, and separatism is understood as a corollary of religious zealotry.[4]

Human rights and international law experts have raised concerns over the implications of the bills in light of the lack of judicial independence in the People's Republic of China.[24] A representative of Human Rights Watch was reported as saying “strengthening law enforcement powers without appropriate judicial checks and balances is dangerous,” and further noted that it was unclear how and by whom organizations and individuals would be designated as terrorists.[24]

Organizations designated as terrorists

The Ministry of Public Security issued a list of what it considers terrorist organizations on 15 December 2003. These include the Eastern Turkestan Islamic Movement, the East Turkestan Liberation Organization, the World Uyghur Congress, and the East Turkistan Information Center. The Ministry further named eleven individuals as terrorists.[25][26]

Out of these groups, the ETIM and ETLO were also designated to be terrorist groups by Kazakhstan[27], Kyrgyzstan[28], and the United Nations. The United States refused China's request to designate the ETLO as such in 2003,[8], although US State Department says the ETLO has engaged "small politically-motivated bombings and armed attacks".[27]

The Eastern Turkistan Islamic Movement, whose aim is to the establishment of a fundamentalist Muslim state to be called "East Turkistan" and the conversion of all Chinese people to Islam[29], operates throughout Central Asia and claimed responsibility for over 200 acts of terrorism from 1990 to 2001, resulting in at least 162 deaths and 440 injuries.[30] The group has a close relation with al-Qaeda and Taliban, having receiving funding and training in Afghanistan. The group was considerable weakened following the American-led invasion of Afghanistan which saw the death of its leader Hasan Mahsum, as well as Emir Abu Mohammed, who was killed in October 2003 in raid on an al-Qaeda training camp in Waziristan by Pakistani forces. [31][32] According to Stratfor, following the death of Mahsum, the group fractured and a successor movement with ties to Central Asian militants was formed in Afghanistan, under the leadership of Abdul Haq. The reformed ETIM issuing several videos including threats to attack the 2008 Summer Olympics in Beijing, although no such large scale attacks took place.[33] Haq was allegedly killed by an US drone strike in Afghanistan in March 2010.[34]

ETIM's capabilities and existance as depicted by the Chinese government has raised doubt amongst Uyghur dissident groups; according to Uyghur expert Dru Gladney, the majority of information on ETIM derive from Chinese government sources and lack independent verification,[35] while other analysts noted that the ETIM was "obscure but not unknown" before the 9/11 attacks, having been documented for over 20 years by both Chinese and non-Chinese scholars.[36]

Furthermore, Uyghur dissident groups criticized the inclusion of the World Uyghur Congress and East Turkistan Information Center, claming that both groups are non-government organizations based in Germany which mainly serve to report information.[26] Chinese state-media published a statement from terrorism scholar Rohan Gunaratna, who claimed that there are "many sympathizers and supporters" within the the WUC, and noted ETIM's role in "fuelling hatred" between the Han Chinese and Uyghur populace.[37]

Chronology of major events

Following is a partial list of events that have been described as terror attacks or attempted terror attacks by non-state actors in the People's Republic of China. Due to variations in the definitions and applications of the term, the characterization of some events as terrorist attacks may be disputed. Many incidents listed occurred in Xinjiang or Tibet—areas where foreign journalists have extremely limited access, and are closely monitored if and when they gain permission to report in the regions.[15][38] As such, many reports of violence or terror attacks cannot be confirmed independently,[39] and foreign reporting frequently relies on information released by the government of China or in the state-run press.[15] In several instances, conflicting narratives of these have emerged from witnesses or from diaspora groups.[15][40]

Date Location Main article Description
5 February 1992 Urumqi, Xinjiang 5 February 1992 Urumqi Bombings Two buses exploded in Urumqi, resulting in at least 3 deaths, and 23 injured.[15] Unconfirmed reports indicated the attacks were perpetrated by the East Turkestan Islamic Party.[16] According to government documents, other bombs were discovered and defused in a local cinema and a residential building.[15]
13 January 1996 Lhasa, Tibet Four major attacks were acknowledged, although unofficial sources reported more. The attacks generally targeted and successfully wounded people, whereas earlier bombings targeted buildings, such an obelisk on the Qinghai-Tibet highway.[41] On 13 January, a Tibetan Buddhist monk exploded a homemade bomb at a shop owned by Han Chinese.[42] Five days later on 18 January, the house of Sengchen Lobsang Gyaltsen, the head lama of the Panchen Lama's Tashilhunpo Monastery, was bombed.[43] Gyaltsen had opposed the 14th Dalai Lama to ordain Gyaincain Norbu in the 11th Panchen Lama controversy. He was out of his house at the time of the explosion, but a person nearby was "seriously injured", according to the South China Morning Post.[41] No group claimed responsibility for the bombings, but China blamed forces loyal to the Dalai Lama.[43] On 18 March, a bomb exploded at the regional government and local Communist Party compound. The government temporarily shut down tourism in Tibet in response.[44] China initially denied all of the blasts, but later attributed them to separatists.[45] The final blast of the year was detonated by remote control at 1:30 am on Christmas day, in front of the central Lhasa municipal government offices. Five people were injured, including two night watchmen and three shopkeepers.[46] The official Radio Tibet called the blast "an appalling act of terrorism", and the Chinese government offered a $120,000 reward for the perpetrator. Vice Chairman of the Tibet Autonomous Region Gyamco called on residents to "heighten our alertness and strengthen preventive measures".[42]
27 February 1997 Urumqi, Xinjiang Urumqi bus bombs Bombs detonated on three buses in Urumqi, leaving nine dead and 68 seriously wounded.[15] The Uyghur Liberation Party claims responsibility for the bombings.[15]
February - April 1998 Qaghiliq, Xinjiang A series of six explosions ocurred in February and March aimed at economic and industrial targets. The following month, authorities reported that bombs exploded at homes and offices of local communist party and public security agents.[15]
16 March 2001 Shijiazhuang, Hebei Shijiazhuang bombings 108 civilians were killed when bombs tore through four city blocks in the city of Shijiazhang.[47] The perpetrator, 41-year-old Jin Ruchao, was allegedly motivated by hated of his ex-wife.[48]

The government account was greeted with skepticism, however;[49] and some sources suggested Jin may have been a scapegoat, and that the bombings may have been the work of disgruntled former factory workers frustrated by layoffs.[50] The bombings were described in the New York Times as the deadliest mass murder in decades,[51] and was characterized by China scholar Andrew Scobell as perhaps the worst terrorist act in the history of the People's Republic of China.[7]

3 April 2002 Chengdu, Sichuan On 3 April, 2002, a bomb described as a "simple fuse device" detonated in Tianfu Square in Chengdu, the capital of Sichuan province. According to local media reports, one individual was seriously injured, and many others were hurt in the blast. Two men were apprehended: 52-year-old Tibetan religious leader Tenzin Deleg Rinpoche, and 26-year-old Lobsang Dondrub.[19] On 2 December, Rinpoche was given a two-year suspended death sentence for "causing explosions [and] inciting the separation of the state." Dondrub was also sentenced to death, and executed on 26 January 2003. The men maintained their innocence, and international observers expressed concerns over the legality of the trial.[17][20]
5 January 2007 Pamirs Plateau, Xinjiang Xinjiang raid Chinese police raided a suspected East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM) training camp in Akto County in the Pamirs plateau near the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan.[52] A spokesperson for the Xinjiang Public Security Bureau said that 18 terror suspects were killed and 17 captured. The raid also resulted in the death of one Chinese police officer and the injury of another. The Bureau said they confiscated hand grenades, guns, and makeshift explosives from the site.[52]
9 March 2008 Urumqi, Xinjiang Authorities had successfully foiled a terrorist attack on a commercial jet.[53] The Souther China flight departed from Urumqi, and made an emergency landing in Lanzhou while en route to Beijing. Two individuals were reportedly taken into custody after flight crew discovered flammable material in the plane's toilet.[53] Xinjiang Governor Nuer Baikeli told reporters that the perpetrators "attempted to create an air disaster," but authorities provided no further details.[54][55]
4 August 2008 Kashgar, Xinjiang 2008 Kashgar attack Suspected ETIM militants reportedly drove a truck into a group of approximately 70 jogging policemen. According to Chinese media accounts, they then got out of the truck wielding machetes, and lobbed grenades at the officers, killing 16 people. However, three tourists in the vicinity provided a different account of the event, saying that the attackers appeared to be uniformed paramilitary police officers attacking other officers with machetes.[40]
10 August 2008 Kuqa County, Xinjiang Seven men armed with homemade explosives reportedly drove taxis into government buildings, in Kuqa, Xinjiang, injuring at least two police officers and a security guard. Five of the assailants were shot and killed.[56][57] The attacks began at 2:30 am when five assailants drove taxis into the local public security and industry and commerce buildings.[57] The Communist Party chief in Xinjiang called the attack a "terrorist act" and suspected the ETIM was responsible.[58]
12 August 2008 Yamanya, Xinjiang Three security officers were allegedly killed in a stabbing incident in Yamanya, near Kashgar in Xinjiang.[39] The report did not specify what the attacker’s affiliations were.[39]
19 August 2010 Aksu, Xinjiang 2010 Aksu bombing Six Uyghur men were allegedly involved in loading a vehicle with explosives and driving into a group of security officers at a highway intersection near Aksu, Xinjiang. Seven people, including two attackers, were killed, according to police.[59] In the wake of the attack, authorities in the region vowed to crack down "relentlessly" on criminal activity.[60]
18 July 2011 Hotan, Xinjiang 2011 Hotan attack 18 people died when 18 young Uyghur men stormed a police station in the city of Hotan. The men were alleged to have stabbed a security guard and two female hostages, and killed another security guard with a bomb. The attack ended when security officers shot and killed 14 of the attackers. Chinese media initially referred to the attackers as rioters or thugs, though subsequent accounts called the event a terrorist attack. [61] The Germany-based World Uyghur Congress provided a different accounts of event, saying that authorities provoked clashes by opening fire on Uyghurs participating in a non-violent protest against heavy-handed security crackdowns in the city.[61][62] The Turkistan Islamic Party later claimed responsibility for the attack.[63]
30 - 31 July 2011 Kashgar, Xinjiang At least 18 people died in an series of attacks in the city of Kashgar. According to local media accounts, the violence began when two Uyghur men hijacked a truck, ran it into a crowded street, and started stabbing people, killing six.[64] The attack ended when the assailants were overpowered by the crowd, which killed one attacker. On the second day, it was reported that a "group of armed terrorists" stormed a restaurant, killed the owner and a waiter, and set it ablaze. They then proceeded to indiscriminately kill four more civilians.[65] Armed clashes then reportedly ensured, ending with police capturing or killing the attackers.[66] The Turkistan Islamic Party later claimed responsibility for the attack.[63] One of the suspects appeared in a TIP video training in Pakistan.[67]

Counter-terrorism

Domestic counter-terrorism

A soldier on patrol Lhasa, Tibet. Chinese authorities have launched "strike-hard" campaigns targeting unsanctioned religious activity and separatism.

According to politics professor Chien-peng Chung, following a spate of unrest and violence in Xinjiang and Tibet in the late 1980s and early 1990s, Chinese authorities adopted a variety of approach to suppress what it considers the "three evils": terrorism, separatism, and religious fundamentalism, which the government considers to be interconnected threats to its authorities.[4] To combat these, the government promoted economic development through investments in infrastructure, tourism, and capital investment to spur growth, and encouraged ethnic Han migration into the western regions. In addition, authorities launched "strike hard" campaigns against crime, which also had the effect of targeting expressions of separatism and unauthorized religious practice.[4]

Chien noted that in recent years, Chinese authorities have allowed for a gradual expansion of individual freedoms in many spheres, all the while maintaining strict control over religious, cultural, and literary associations of ethnic minorities in Xinjiang and Tibet.[4] In 1997, a "strike hard" campaign began in Tibet and Xinjiang involving in tightly controlling religious activities and festivals. In Tibet, authorities sought to curtail the influence of the Dalai Lama by banning all displays of his image, and in 1995, authorities replaced his choice of the number two Panchen Lama with a Beijing-approved candidate.[4] In Xinjiang, authorities placed restrictions on unofficial religious practices, and closely monitored Muslims returning from madrasah schools overseas.[4] Following the September 11 attacks, such schools were perceived as hotbeds of religious extremism and anti-Western sentiments.[68]

Chien also noted that corresponding to the launch of strike-hard campaigns and economic stimulus efforts, there was a apparent decrease in the level of organized violent protest or bombings in the Western autonomous regions. Whereas levels of anti-government violence were high from 1987-1997, reported instances were virtually non-existent in the several years that followed.[4] In the aftermath of the strike-hard campaigns, Tibetan and Uyghur dissident groups overseas have adjusted their strategies in promoting their causes: as of 1998 the Dalai Lama has no longer called for outright Tibetan independence, and Uyghur groups have become more adept in framing their cause as one of human rights and free elections. Chien noted that while instances of violent organized protest and bombings have decreased, heightened tensions between local ethnic groups and the Han Chinese who have migrated into Xinjiang and Tibet en masse since the 1990s.[4] According to Chien, in terms of public relations and reporting incidences of violence, local authorities are encouraged to take accounts of foreign investments so that they would not be discouraged by violence, but at the same time, authorities needed justifications to initiate actions against separatist groups.[4]

International relations

The government of the People’s Republic of China has engaged in cooperation at the bilateral and multilateral level to gain support for its efforts to combat terrorism and ethnic separatism. This has increased following the September 11 attacks in the United States, which led to the global War on Terror.

Much of this cooperation involves the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, which includes several Central Asian states, home to large ethnic Uyghur populations. The Chinese government has periodically requested that authorities in Kyrgyzstan and Kazakhstan crack down on Uyghur secessionists[4], and that they extradite suspected terrorists and separatists to China.[69] The Government of Kazakhstan has consistently extradited Uyghur terrorist suspects to China[70] and in 2006 participated in a large-scale, joint counter-terrorism drill.[71]

The Chinese and Kyrgyz governments increased security along their borders with each other and Tajikistan in January 2007 after Chinese government officials expressed concern that alleged international terrorists were traveling through Xinjiang and Central Asia to carry out attacks. The warning followed a high-profile raid on a training camp in Akto County, Xinjiang run by suspected East Turkestan Islamic Movement members.[72]

In 2006, American forces captured 22 Uyghur militants from combat zones in Afghanistan and Pakistan in 2006 on information that they were linked to Al-Qaeda.[73] They were imprisoned for five to seven years in Guantanamo Bay, where they testified that they were trained by ETIM leader Abdul Haq, at an ETIM training camp. After being reclassified as No Longer Enemy Combatant, a panel of judges ordered them released into the United States, as they could not be released back to China because of human rights concerns.[74] A Chinese government spokesman denounced the move as a violation of international law and demanded the return of the men to China.

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d e Kam V. Wong, “Police Practices in Global Perspective,” John Eterno ed., (Rowman & Littlefield, 2011).
  2. ^ John Philip Jenkins (ed.). "Terrorism". Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved August 11, 2006.
  3. ^ "Terrorism". The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (4th edition ed.). Bartleby.com. 2000. Retrieved August 11, 2006. {{cite encyclopedia}}: |edition= has extra text (help)
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Chung Chien-peng. "Confronting Terrorism and Other Evils in China: All Quiet on the Western Front?. In China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly, Volume 4 Issue 2, pp 75–87. Accessed 2 January 2010.
  5. ^ a b c Gus Martin, "Understanding Terrorism: Challenges, Perspectives, and Issues," (Sage Publications: 2003), ISBN 978-0-7619-2616-0.
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Ogden, Suzanne. "Inoculation against Terrorism in China" in William J. Crotty ed. Democratic development and political terrorism: the global perspective. Northeaster, 2005.
  7. ^ a b c d Martin I. Wayne, “China’s war on terrorism: counter-insurgency, politics, and internal security,” (New York, NY: Routeledge, 2008).
  8. ^ a b c d Amnesty International, "People’s Republic Of China: Uighurs Fleeing Persecution As China Wages Its ‘War On Terror’", 7 July 2004.
  9. ^ a b c BBC News, China draft bill defines terrorism amid 'real threat', 25 October 2011.
  10. ^ a b Congressional-Executive Commission on China, 2005 Annual Report, Freedom of Religion, 2005. Quote: “Sichuan authorities sometimes impute terrorist motives to Tibetan monks who travel to India without permission.” [...] “Religious repression in Xinjiang is severe, driven by Party policies that equate peaceful Uighur religious practices with terrorism and religious extremism.”
  11. ^ Marketos, Thrassy N. (2009). China's Energy Geopolitics: The Shanghai Cooperation Organization and Central Asia. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 9780415456906.
  12. ^ Lüthi, Lorenz M. (2008). The Sino-Soviet split: Cold War in the communist world. Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691135908.
  13. ^ a b c Van Wie Davis, Elizabath. "Uyghur Muslim Ethnic Separatism in Xinjiang, China". Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies. Retrieved 2010-06-28.
  14. ^ a b University of Maryland Minorities at Risk Project, Assessment for Turkmen in China.
  15. ^ a b c d e f g h i j James Millward, "Violent Separatism in Xinjiang:A Critical Assessment", East-West Center, Foreign Studies 6, 2004.
  16. ^ a b University of Maryland Minorities at Risk Project, “Chronology for Turkmen in China”.
  17. ^ a b c d e Human Rights Watch, Trials of a Tibetan Monk: The Case of Tenzin Delek, February 2004, Volume 16, No 1.
  18. ^ Congressional-Executive Commission on China, Annual Report 2006 : Tibet, 2006.
  19. ^ a b Erik Eckholm, China Court Rejects Appeal of Tibetan Monk Sentenced to Death for Separatism, New York Times, 27 January 2003.
  20. ^ a b Congressional-Executive Commission on China, The Execution of Lobsang Dondrub and the Case Against Tenzin Deleg
The Law, the Courts, and the Debate on Legality.
  21. ^ Tania Branigan, ‘Dalai Lama's prayers for Tibetans 'terrorism in disguise', China says’, The Guardian, 19 October 2011.
  22. ^ Congressional-Executive Commission on China, Annual Report 2006 : Tibet, 2006. Quote: “The Chinese government portrays as terrorists some Tibetans living outside of China who call for independence, but has not provided evidence for this designation.”
  23. ^ Knaus, John Kenneth. Orphans of the Cold War: America And The Tibetan Struggle For Survival
  24. ^ a b c Ananth Krishnan, Concern as China mulls over anti-terror laws, The Hindu, 26 October 2011.
  25. ^ "China identifies Eastern Turkistan terrorist organizations, terrorists". GlobalSecurity.org. 16 December 2003. Retrieved 2 January 2010. BEIJING, 15 Dec. (Xinhuanet) – China's Ministry of Public Security Monday issued a list of the first batch of identified "Eastern Turkistan" terrorist organizations and 11 members of the groups. [...] This is the first time China issued a list of terrorist organizations and terrorists.
  26. ^ a b British Broadcasting Corporation, "China issues 'terrorist' list", 15 December 2003.
  27. ^ a b Uyghur group added to Kazakh terror list RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty
  28. ^ Islamic groups banned in Kyrgyzstan Central Asia Caucasus Institute
  29. ^ Bashir, Shaykh (2008-07-01). "Why Are We Fighting China?" (PDF). NEFA Foundation. Retrieved 2010-08-07. ...We are fighting China... China is an enemy who has invaded Muslim countries and occupies Muslim East Turkestan. There is no greater obligation, aside from belief in Allah, than expelling the enemies of Muslims from our countries.... We are fighting China to make them testify that 'there is no God but Allah, Mohammed is the Messenger of Allah' and make them convert to Islam....
  30. ^ "Al-Qaida: Dead or captured". MSNBC. 2005-06-22. Retrieved 2010-07-31.
  31. ^ "China: The Evolution of ETIM". Stratfor. 2008-05-13. Retrieved 2010-08-07.
  32. ^ Guang, Pan (2006). "East Turkestan Terrorism and the Terrorist Arc: china's Post-9/11 Anti-Terror Strategy". China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly. 4 (2). ISSN 1653-4212. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  33. ^ [www.stratfor.com/analysis/china-etims-direct-threat-olympics "China: ETIM's Direct Threat to the Olympics"]. Stratfor. 2008-07-25. Retrieved 2010-07-31. {{cite news}}: Check |url= value (help)
  34. ^ "Xinjiang fighter 'killed by drone'". Al Jazeera. 2010-03-02. Retrieved 2010-03-22. The leader of a Chinese separatist movement, believed to have links with al-Qaeda, has been killed in a US missile strike, Pakistani and Taliban officials have said.
  35. ^ Freed from Guantánamo, a Uighur clings to asylum dreams in Sweden
  36. ^ Reed, J. Todd (2010). The ETIM: China's Islamic Militants and the Global Terrorist Threat. ABC-CLIO. pp. 14–16, 46–47. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  37. ^ "Xinjiang riot hits regional anti-terror nerve". China Daily. Xinhua. 2009-07-18. Retrieved 2010-08-01.
  38. ^ See, for example, Nicholas Kristof, Terrorism and the Olympics, New York Times, 29 May 2008.
  39. ^ a b c AFP, [Three dead as unrest flares in China's restive Xinjiang, 12 August 2008.
  40. ^ a b Edward Wong, "Doubt arises in account of an attack in China", New York Times, 29 September 2008.
  41. ^ a b "Tibetan Newspaper Sabotaged; Lama's House Bombed". TibetInfoNet. 28 January 1996. Retrieved 15 January 2011.
  42. ^ a b "Bomb at Government Offices Wounds 5 in Tibetan Capital". The New York Times. 30 December 1996. Retrieved 15 January 2011.
  43. ^ a b Hilton, Isabel (2001). The Search for the Panchen Lama. W. W. Norton & Company. p. 295.
  44. ^ "Bomb Explodes outside Lhasa Party Headquarters". Tibet Information Network. 22 March 1996. Retrieved 15 January 2011.
  45. ^ Buckley, Michael (2006). Tibet. Bradt Travel Guides. p. 133.
  46. ^ Poole, Teresa (30 December 1996). "Tibetan activists set off Lhasa bomb". The Independent. UK. Retrieved 15 January 2011.
  47. ^ BBC, China says 108 killed in blasts, 17 March 2001.
  48. ^ People's Daily, Hatred, Revenge Motive for Fatal Shijiazhuang Explosions, 16 March 2001.
  49. ^ David Rennie, Chinese bomber 'went to his targets by taxi', The Telegraph, 28 March 2001.
  50. ^ BBC, China blast reward doubled, 20 March 2001.
  51. ^ John Gittings, Manhunt for mass killer fails to pacify Chinese, The Guardian, 20 March 2001.
  52. ^ a b British Broadcasting Service, China 'anti-terror' raid kills 18, 8 January 2007.
  53. ^ a b Ben Blanchard, China foils attempted terror attack on flight, Reuters, 9 March 2008.
  54. ^ Geoffrey York, Olympic terror plot foiled, Beijing says, The Globe and Mail, 10 March 2008.
  55. ^ Report: China thwarts two terrorist attacks CNN
  56. ^ Parry, Richard Lloyd (11 August 2008). "China's Uighur rebels switch to suicide bombs". The Sunday Times. UK. Retrieved 22 April 2011.
  57. ^ a b Moore, Malcolm (10 August 2008). "China beefs up security in Kuqa after new terror attack". The Daily Telegraph. Urumqi. Retrieved 22 April 2010.
  58. ^ "Blasts, gunfire kill at least eight in China's far west (2nd roundup)". Deutsche Presse-Agentur. 10 August 2008. Retrieved 22 April 2010.
  59. ^ David Barboza, Blast Kills 7 in Restive Chinese Region, New York Times, 19 August 2010.
  60. ^ Reuters, China detains four over attack on Xinjiang police, 25 August 2010.
  61. ^ a b Olesen, Alexa (19 July 2011). Associated Press China says 14 extremists killed in Xinjiang attack http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2015665074_apaschinaxinjiang.html China says 14 extremists killed in Xinjiang attack. Retrieved 29 July 2011. {{cite news}}: Check |url= value (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)
  62. ^ The Economist, http://www.economist.com/node/21524940 “Let them shoot hoops”], 30 July 2011.
  63. ^ a b . BBC News. 8 September 2011 Islamic militant group 'behind Xinjiang attacks' http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-pacific-14834042 Islamic militant group 'behind Xinjiang attacks'. Retrieved 8 October 2011. {{cite news}}: Check |url= value (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)
  64. ^ BBC, “China: Unrest in Kashgar, Xinjiang, leaves 15 dead”, 31 July 2011.
  65. ^ Michael Wines, “Deadly Violence Strikes Chinese City Racked by Ethnic Tensions”, New York Times, 31 July 2011.
  66. ^ Cheng, Yongsun; Yu, Xiaodong (2011). "The Bloody Weekend". News China: 23–25. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  67. ^ Zenn, Jacob (2 September 2011). Kashgar: Asia Times Catch-22 of Xinjiang as a gateway http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/MI22Ad02.html Catch-22 of Xinjiang as a gateway. Retrieved 9 October 2011. {{cite news}}: Check |url= value (help); Missing or empty |title= (help)
  68. ^ Moeller, Susan (2007-06-21). "Jumping on the US Bandwagon for a "War on Terror"". YaleGlobal Online. Yale Center for the Study of Globalization.
  69. ^ Graham Fuller and Jonathan Lipman, “Islam in Xinjiang,” in S. Frederick Starr Ed. Xinjiang: China’s Muslim Borderland (ME Sharpe, 2004).
  70. ^ Kazakhstan exacerbates "religious threat" by maneuvering between Beijing and Washington Jamestown Foundation
  71. ^ China/Kazakhstan: Forces Hold First-Ever Joint Terrorism Exercises Radio Free Europe
  72. ^ China: Border security tightened amid 'terrorist infiltration' warning Radio Free Europe
  73. ^ Fletcher, Holly; Bajoria, Jayshree (2008-07-31). "The East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM)". Backgrounder. Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved 2010-07-31.
  74. ^ de Vogue, Ariane; Powell, Dennis; Ryan, Jason (2009-04-24). "Guantanamo Uyghur Detainees: Coming to America?". ABC News. Retrieved 2010-07-31.