Jump to content

MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Reverted good faith edits by Catalina520 (talk): Do not delete text from this page.
Line 416: Line 416:


'''Comment''': econlib.org probably shouldn't be on the blacklist. It contains the full text of many classical economics texts. [[User:Jrheller1|Jrheller1]] ([[User talk:Jrheller1|talk]]) 20:58, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
'''Comment''': econlib.org probably shouldn't be on the blacklist. It contains the full text of many classical economics texts. [[User:Jrheller1|Jrheller1]] ([[User talk:Jrheller1|talk]]) 20:58, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

==womanitely.com==
{{LinkSummary|womanitely.com}}

useful blog I think it shouldn't be on the blacklist. Many writers from the US contribute to it.
[[User:Catalina520|Catalina520]] ([[User talk:Catalina520|talk]]) 14:14, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

:Note that this is blocked on the [[m:Spam blacklist]] and user has already [[m:talk:Spam_blacklist#womanitely.com|raised it over there]]. <b><font color="darkred">[[User:Ravensfire|Ravensfire]]</font></b> <font color="black">([[User talk:Ravensfire|talk]])</font> 18:01, 24 March 2017 (UTC)


=Troubleshooting and problems=
=Troubleshooting and problems=

Revision as of 20:55, 24 March 2017

"Wikipedia:Spam-blacklist" redirects here. Not to be confused with Wikipedia:Spam blacklist or Wikipedia:Spam-blacklisting.
    Spam blacklists
    Shortcuts

    Mediawiki:Spam-blacklist is meant to be used by the spam blacklist extension. Unlike the meta spam blacklist, this blacklist affects pages on the English Wikipedia only. Any administrator may edit the spam blacklist. See Wikipedia:Spam blacklist for more information about the spam blacklist.

    Instructions for editors

    There are 4 sections for posting comments below. Please make comments in the appropriate section. These links take you to the appropriate section:

    1. Proposed additions
    2. Proposed removals
    3. Troubleshooting and problems
    4. Discussion

    Each section has a message box with instructions. In addition, please sign your posts with ~~~~ after your comment.

    Completed requests are archived. Additions and removals are logged, reasons for blacklisting can be found there.

    Addition of the templates {{Link summary}} (for domains), {{IP summary}} (for IP editors) and {{User summary}} (for users with account) results in the COIBot reports to be refreshed. See User:COIBot for more information on the reports.

    Instructions for admins
    Any admin unfamiliar with this page should probably read this first, thanks.
    If in doubt, please leave a request and a spam-knowledgeable admin will follow-up.

    Please consider using Special:BlockedExternalDomains instead, powered by the AbuseFilter extension. This is faster and more easily searchable, though only supports whole domains and not whitelisting.

    1. Does the site have any validity to the project?
    2. Have links been placed after warnings/blocks? Have other methods of control been exhausted? Would referring this to our anti-spam bot, XLinkBot be a more appropriate step? Is there a WikiProject Spam report? If so, a permanent link would be helpful.
    3. Please ensure all links have been removed from articles and discussion pages before blacklisting. (They do not have to be removed from user or user talk pages.)
    4. Make the entry at the bottom of the list (before the last line). Please do not do this unless you are familiar with regular expressions — the disruption that can be caused is substantial.
    5. Close the request entry on here using either {{done}} or {{not done}} as appropriate. The request should be left open for a week maybe as there will often be further related sites or an appeal in that time.
    6. Log the entry. Warning: if you do not log any entry you make on the blacklist, it may well be removed if someone appeals and no valid reasons can be found. To log the entry, you will need this number – 772017944 after you have closed the request. See here for more info on logging.

    Proposed additions

    Wikipedia mirrors through google books

    Starting a discussion here, after Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#Restricting Google book links from a specific publisher discussion (permanent link [1]).

    Pinging editors involved in those discussions: @Ugog Nizdast, Someguy1221, and Utcursch:. Is anyone of you aware of editors who have a more than healthy tendency (i.e. spam) to add these, or do they tend to be one-off good-faith additions?

    The following books are published on Google books, but contain unattributed material from Wikipedia (see Wikipedia:Potentially unreliable sources/Books that plagiarize Wikipedia for specific examples of copies). Referencing these is hence resulting in circular references, and the material is therefore hence not verifiable.

    Specific links:

    • books.google.co.in/books?id=mY8X_vlVThAC&lpg=PA48&ots=ol2ZKxPMBA&dq=%22remains%20to%20be%20investigated%20whether%20its%20findings%22&pg=PA47#v=onepage&q=%22remains%20to%20be%20investigated%20whether%20its%20findings%22&f=false
    • books.google.co.in/books?id=ZsswQ9oTa0wC&lpg=PA3&dq=%22was%20the%20principal%20artist%20of%20the%20Bengal%20school%22&pg=PA3#v=onepage&q=%22was%20the%20principal%20artist%20of%20the%20Bengal%20school%22&f=false
    • books.google.co.in/books?id=zzbuJOC11BoC&lpg=PA129&pg=PA129#v=onepage&q&f=true
    • books.google.co.in/books?id=fu84nNqH-o4C&lpg=PA10&vq=Cycle%20of%20Samsara&dq=bibliogroup%3A%22Indian%20religions%20series%22&pg=PA99#v=snippet&q=Mahaparinibbana%20Sutta&f=false
    • books.google.co.in/books?id=aGiwrLKJ8mkC&lpg=PA10&vq=shaping%20of%20Western%20civilization&dq=bibliogroup%3A%22Indian%20religions%20series%22&pg=PA5#v=snippet&q=self-sufficient%20revelation&f=false
    • books.google.co.in/books?id=J7AIg5bVFCYC&lpg=PA293&vq=symbolism%20and%20iconography&dq=bibliogroup%3A%22Indian%20religions%20series%22&pg=PA77#v=snippet&q=chaitnya&f=false
    • books.google.com/books?id=gMiQMWGhoScC&pg=PA163
    • books.google.co.in/books?id=GzyLjkqbVGQC&lpg=PP1&vq=%22scholarship%20and%20have%20the%20highest%20degree%22&dq=bibliogroup%3A%22Indian%20religions%20series%22&pg=PA8#v=snippet&q=Utsarpinis%20&f=false
    • books.google.co.in/books?id=uhtzeompVAUC&lpg=PP1&dq=bibliogroup%3A%22Indian%20religions%20series%22&pg=PA60#v=onepage&q=mathematical%20%20cobra&f=false
    • books.google.co.in/books?id=_rPHSdXk1GEC&lpg=PP1&dq=bibliogroup%3A%22Indian%20religions%20series%22&pg=PA111#v=snippet&q=druj&f=false
    • books.google.co.in/books?id=vRwS6FmS2g0C&lpg=PA175&dq=%22The%20rise%20of%20Khalsa%20dominance%20in%20the%20Sikh%22&pg=PA175#v=onepage&q=%22The%20rise%20of%20Khalsa%20dominance%20in%20the%20Sikh%22&f=false
    • books.google.co.in/books?id=BCqYE087Yt8C&lpg=PP1&pg=PA17#v=onepage&q=According%20to%20the%20agenda-setting%20theory&f=false
    • books.google.ca/books?id=rFW8AgAAQBAJ&pg=PT115
    • books.google.ca/books?id=hg3qAgAAQBAJ&pg=PT48
    • books.google.com/books?id=0A3qAgAAQBAJ&pg=PT47
    • books.google.com/books?id=fms4CgAAQBAJ&pg=PT72
    • books.google.ca/books?id=XAT4AgAAQBAJ&pg=PT166
    • books.google.ca/books?id=alllAwAAQBAJ&pg=PT104
    • books.google.com/books?id=YLhBAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA281
    • books.google.ca/books?id=zU-xAAAAQBAJ&pg=PA655
    • books.google.co.in/books?id=fM33afZnVy8C&lpg=PA153&dq=%22marketers%20see%20advertising%20as%20part%20of%20an%20overall%20promotional%20strategy%22&pg=PA153#v=onepage&q=%22marketers%20see%20advertising%20as%20part%20of%20an%20overall%20promotional%20strategy%22&f=false
    • books.google.co.in/books?id=LSnewoqa5UwC&lpg=PT18&ots=4fA3Ixsidr&dq=%22remains%20to%20be%20investigated%20whether%20its%20findings%22&pg=PT20#v=onepage&q=%22remains%20to%20be%20investigated%20whether%20its%20findings%22&f=false
    • books.google.co.in/books?id=ZzjDzqtNgoQC&lpg=PT133&dq=Chanakya%20trautmann%20parvata&pg=PT133#v=onepage&q=Chanakya%20trautmann%20parvata&f=false
    • books.google.ca/books?id=ngCqCQAAQBAJ&lpg=PA139&pg=PA139
    • books.google.com/books?id=uf2pCQAAQBAJ

    The regexes need to be crafted from 'books.google', followed by an 'id=<code>' to blacklist each specific book. --Dirk Beetstra T C 03:32, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Note that the URL can be books.google.* depending on the country (e.g. .com for the US, .ca for Canada, .co.in for India, .co.uk for the UK etc.)
    Here are the book IDs:
    3
    utcursch | talk 03:38, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Beetstra Per your note at the pump, the two specific examples I picked up from WP:PUS are: id# VY1nTMBQ9vQC and id# zzbuJOC11BoC. The second one is included above but the first isn't. The first has been published many times by Gyan (and other publishers) and has multiple IDs I think. —SpacemanSpiff 13:29, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    List of IDs

    2
    plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --Dirk Beetstra T C 13:06, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I have pulled the trigger on this subset. If more arise, please report them in a new thread, or as a new subthread in this thread. --Dirk Beetstra T C 13:07, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    dcgpac.com

    dcgpac.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

    plus Added MER-C 02:42, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    immihelp.com, visajourney.com, k1-visa.net, rapidvisa.com

    WP:REFSPAM for immigration-related websites. Guy (Help!) 19:06, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --Guy (Help!) 19:07, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Immigration law refspam round 3

    List of domains

    All appear to have been added by Vipul (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), Riceissa (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) or other paid surrogates of Vipul, most are selling legal services related to immigration, and the overall conclusion is SEO. All valid content can be drawn from more authoritative sources such as law books, pages in law faculty websites, official government sources etc. Guy (Help!) 23:24, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --Guy (Help!) 23:26, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I think econlib.org needs to be removed. This is a legitimate, relatively prominent Economics blog where relatively prominent economists(Sumner, Bryan Caplan) discuss current issues in econ. Dark567 (talk) 01:31, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    It's being spammed by user:Vipul, but I will; look into it. Guy (Help!) 10:44, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Immigration law spam round 4

    Some owned by the same people as the ones above. Guy (Help!) 10:44, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --Guy (Help!) 10:44, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Archive-org.com

    archive-org.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

    This looks like a scam. For a time they offered free website archiving, then later added a paywall so you can't access the content without donating money. This is nonsense, we have many free and open source archive sites such as archive.org and dozens more .. notice they used almost the same name to confuse people. The article Floorball contains an example link archive-org.com/page/4261749/2014-07-11/http://www.freeway.org/issue4/sports/floorball.htm. Please ping me if you need further input. -- GreenC 18:23, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    A connected site is www.inarchive.com/ which lists dozens of domain names eg.archive-se.com, archive.by.com etc.. they are not all paywalled so I don't know what to make of it.

    -- GreenC 20:47, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    • Can you assemble a complete list here please? Also any users who may be spamming it? It may also be an issue for the meta blacklist as these could be used to bypass other blacklists. Guy (Help!) 09:24, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • @Green Cardamom: I agree with JzG, can you please compile a full list? I'd like to review the reports for more of them to see patterns. (I have disabled the links in this thread, in case we decide to blacklist).
    • @JzG: Spamming here does not necessarily need to be the 'abuse'/misuse we try to block (though we would likely pull the trigger earlier). As the domains are similar to known genuine archiving sites, I guess many of these links get added in good faith. Meta-blacklisting may be prudent, especially if there is spamming. --Dirk Beetstra T C 11:34, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Can you assemble a complete list here please? --User:Green Cardamom. There are 73 domains:
    Extended content
    • web-archive-uk.com
    • archive-se.com
    • archive-fr.com
    • archive-nl.com
    • archive-dk.com
    • archive-ie.com
    • web-archive-it.com
    • archive-be.com
    • archive-es.com
    • archive-at.com
    • archive-no.com
    • archive-us.com
    • archive-ca.com
    • archive-au.com
    • archive-de.com
    • archive-cz.com
    • archive-hu.com
    • archive-fi.com
    • archive-ch.com
    • archive-pl.com
    • archive-sk.com
    • archive-ro.com
    • archive-ua.com
    • web-archive-pt.com
    • archive-nz.com
    • archive-si.com
    • archive-lt.com
    • web-archive-bg.com
    • archive-lv.com
    • archive-eu.com
    • archive-com.com
    • web-archive-net.com
    • archive-org.com
    • archive-biz.com
    • archive-edu.com
    • archive-co.com
    • archive-info.com
    • web-archive-me.com
    • archive-tv.com
    • archive-mobi.com
    • archive-name.com
    • archive-am.com
    • archive-br.com
    • archive-pe.com
    • archive-cc.com
    • archive-ee.com
    • archive-fm.com
    • web-archive-ar.com
    • archive-mx.com
    • archive-hr.com
    • archive-za.com
    • archive-ht.com
    • archive-py.com
    • archive-hn.com
    • archive-ng.com
    • archive-gr.com
    • archive-cl.com
    • archive-do.com
    • archive-cr.com
    • archive-uy.com
    • archive-sv.com
    • archive-cu.com
    • archive-pr.com
    • archive-rs.com
    • archive-sg.com
    • archive-ph.com
    • archive-in.com
    • archive-by.com
    • archive-ve.com
    • archive-id.com
    • archive-tr.com
    • archive-kz.com
    • archive-ru.com
    • Also any users who may be spamming it? I searched the entire enwiki |archiveurl= fields for these domains and found only a few instances in these articles:
    Extended content
    • Bozhin
    • Enlargement
    • Floorball
    • Henry
    • Ken
    • Lyu
    • Madonna
    • Maximilian
    • Nikanor
    • Poland
    • Records
    • Rehman
    • Russell
    • Shawn

    Search "archive-" inside the article or regex archive[-][^.]*[.]com. -- GreenC 14:47, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    backupify.com

    plus Added to MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --Guy (Help!) 09:45, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Predatory journals

    I have been watching these predatory open access publishers for some months. New links keep being added, very often by users whose identities strongly suggest they are the authors of the papers. I think it is time to blacklist these ones due to repeated additions over an extended period, even though at east some of these additions are in good faith. Guy (Help!) 09:23, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    trypophobia

    Ongoing efforts over months to years to add this link. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:50, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Concerns were previously raised[8]. So therefore added it. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:58, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


    revitalisecosmetics.com.au

    Being spammed into a bunch of articles in replacement of valid refs; see Special:Contributions/Moefry1. Zero value as a reference for any encyclopedic content. Jytdog (talk) 04:48, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @Jytdog: no Declined for now, user is blocked. However, if this is now continued on other accounts, I will blacklist this immediately. --Dirk Beetstra T C 06:02, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    specificationtech.com

    specificationtech .com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • .com Spamcheck • .com MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - .com%22&fulltext=Advanced+search advanced - .com%22 RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: .com search • .com+site:wikimedia.org meta • Domain: .com domaintools • .com AboutUs.com

    arabic-keyboard.info

    arabic-keyboard.info: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com
    2604:2000:71C2:0:5D33:3CF9:BA1B:12E9 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • robtex.com • Google) diff #1, diff #2
    2604:2000:71C2:0:D42A:4F01:BAA2:F7EF (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • robtex.com • Google) diff #3
    2604:2000:71C2:0:F530:80EC:DB07:9C1F (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • robtex.com • Google) diff #4, diff #5

    The diffs are from the past few days only, when I've kept track of them, but I know I've seen them before. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 16:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    csgopedia.com

    csgopedia.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

    Proposed removals


    mobigyaan.com

    mobigyaan.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

    Dear Administrators, I cite mobigyaan.com along with other websites once in a while whenever I feel it's worth doing that. I have been their regular reader since last few years. Today when I tried to add the link I got a message that the domain has been blacklisted, I couldn't understand why it happened as this website is an authentic news source. Requesting you to look into this and remove it from the blacklist.

    PS - Since, I haven't done this earlier I didn't know that mention of user name of necessary for the replies. I used to update without login.

    Pixel love (talk) 10:38, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Why am I not getting a reply? Pixel love (talk) 19:09, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    It was blacklisted per Wikipedia:WikiProject_Spam/LinkReports/mobigyaan.com, the report shows an very unhealthy number of IPs who solely edit to add info referenced to this site (WP:REFSPAM). I am sure User:MER-C can tell more. --Dirk Beetstra T C 03:15, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    That, and when I added the domain to the blacklist hardly any of those additions had survived. I certainly don't remember removing any links, and my contribution history shows I didn't remove any when I blacklisted the link. MER-C 04:34, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't about all the IPs but I made a few additions without login as I find that easy. Also, I didn't add all the references on a single day, I cited them only when I found something made sense. So, what I am understanding is that somebody tried to add too many links from some IP and got this website banned, is that the case? Pixel love 09:19, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Hello, please reply. Pixel love 03:22, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Pixel love: You mean that you made those additions using 40 different IPs out of at least 3 IP-ranges? --Dirk Beetstra T C 06:57, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    I think that there is some confusion here. I don't know remember how many additions I made, I mentioned that I made a few additions. I didn't make a user account as I felt that it was easier to do without it. This was the first part of my answer.

    In the second questioned I asked, if posting from IP can result in ban, then isn't it easier for anybody to get any website banned.

    Also, I am a little confused about the reason of the ban. This is solely for my knowledge about the Wikipedia usage. If posting to wikipedia without login resulted in ban for this website, then I have done this for other websites as well, will those sites be banned as well? Pixel love 14:44, 09 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    No, but additions by 40 different IPs that all are practically reverted may be. I guess that you were one or two of the separate IPs. For the rest, see Joe job, and in a way it is not really our concern, our concern is to stop the disruption. --Dirk Beetstra T C
    So, this website should not be removed from the blacklist? --Pixel love 08:44, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Please reply --Pixel love 07:08, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @Pixel love: there were additions by 40-ish IPs, and most of the additions were already reverted/removed .. that signifies that these additions were not wanted. We are not here to play whack-a-mole with more IPs and keep reverting such additions. If you think that it is somewhere of use, please request whitelisting of specific links with specific use ( Defer to Whitelist), but until significant use of this site is evident, indeed delisting is no Declined. --Dirk Beetstra T C 08:12, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    My point here is that may be somebody tried to play a mischief, I have been a loyal reader of them since last few years and they are one of the most authentic news source in India when it comes to technology news.I know I don't have any say here, but I just tried to put my point of view. Considering the quality of news they produce on daily basis, they shouldn't be banned. Those link which you think/know are spam should be removed for sure, but banning entire site because somebody else abused the system would be too harsh. I hope you will consider this. --Pixel love 08:55, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    What happens off-site is not our problem, the purpose of the spam blacklist is to protect Wikipedia from people adding unwanted external links. In any case, the links did not seem very wanted, most of them were already removed. --Dirk Beetstra T C 11:58, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    You are saying that links are removed, but I saw this link today https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xiaomi#cite_ref-63, you can also check that there is no spam here and the link was properly added. --Pixel love 12:55, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    attukaldevi.com

    attukaldevi.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

    Attukaldevi.com is block listed, the site is more informative of Attukal Devi temple. I request you to visit this site and remove from spam list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.51.20.162 (talk) 09:58, February 17, 2017‎

    no Declined,  Defer to Whitelist for specific links on this domain. --Dirk Beetstra T C 08:12, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    econlib.org

    I copy a thread from WP:HD.

    Any attempt to edit Apartheid seems to be rejected. The reason given is that the article contains a new link to banned site econlib.org (or something close -- I may have gotten it wrong. The edits I have attmpted don't include anything remotely close to that. Can somebody find out what's wrong and fix it? In the See also section, I was trying to add a wikilink to Born a Crime. Lou Sander (talk) 04:31, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

    I can't explain what's going on. When I try to do the same thing (both with my non-admin sock and my main account), I get MediaWiki:Spamprotectiontext and a warning about econlib.org, even though that URL isn't in the page text. Nyttend (talk) 04:59, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
    Even weirder: I removed econlib from the spam blacklist and then tried to insert the link, and even then I got rejected because my edit added "econlib.org". Time for a Phabricator bug request? In case you wonder, I've restored the blacklist entry for econlib. Nyttend (talk) 05:03, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

    Can anyone explain what's going on? See [18] for URL removal and click "next" for restoration. JzG, you comment about that URL in a thread higher on this page; are you at all familiar with the situation? I'm not asking for "permanent" removal; I just wondered if someone more familiar with this blacklist might have a better idea than I of how to remove it temporarily to enable this edit. Nyttend (talk) 05:08, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Lou Sander: I am taking it off for now, but lets see what happens (see follow up edit). Maybe some lag-time? minus Removed from MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. --Dirk Beetstra T C 05:12, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    econlib.org. Test edit to see whether this can now be saved. --Dirk Beetstra T C 05:13, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Removing and re-adding seems to work now. --Dirk Beetstra T C 05:16, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I am removing a large number of inappropriate links to this partisan website at the moment. It was extensively spammed by a group of libertarian agenda editors. Guy (Help!) 12:00, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @JzG: I agree that it got spammed with many other links, however, there are now remarks about this specific one from that set of links above (both in that thread and this thread) as to being genuine. Maybe this is one for XLinkBot? --Dirk Beetstra T C 12:49, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    EconLib is the "Library of Economics and Liberty", run by Liberty Fund, a libertarian think-tank of no obvious significance. I suspect that most of the uses of this source right now are inappropriate. I removed the links from the Apartheid article. The issue is that many (most?0 of the links are to an online "encyclopaedia" of economics published by this group. It's another fisheaters. Guy (Help!) 12:57, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Comment: econlib.org probably shouldn't be on the blacklist. It contains the full text of many classical economics texts. Jrheller1 (talk) 20:58, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    womanitely.com

    womanitely.com: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

    useful blog I think it shouldn't be on the blacklist. Many writers from the US contribute to it. Catalina520 (talk) 14:14, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Note that this is blocked on the m:Spam blacklist and user has already raised it over there. Ravensfire (talk) 18:01, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Troubleshooting and problems

    Logging / COIBot Instr

    Blacklist logging

    Full instructions for admins


    Quick reference

    For Spam reports or requests originating from this page, use template {{/request|0#section_name}}

    • {{/request|213416274#Section_name}}
    • Insert the oldid 213416274 a hash "#" and the Section_name (Underscoring_spaces_where_applicable):
    • Use within the entry log here.

    For Spam reports or requests originating from Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam use template {{WPSPAM|0#section_name}}

    • {{WPSPAM|182725895#Section_name}}
    • Insert the oldid 182725895 a hash "#" and the Section_name (Underscoring_spaces_where_applicable):
    • Use within the entry log here.
    Note: If you do not log your entries, it may be removed if someone appeals the entry and no valid reasons can be found.

    Addition to the COIBot reports

    The lower list in the COIBot reports now have after each link four numbers between brackets (e.g. "www.example.com (0, 0, 0, 0)"):

    1. first number, how many links did this user add (is the same after each link)
    2. second number, how many times did this link get added to wikipedia (for as far as the linkwatcher database goes back)
    3. third number, how many times did this user add this link
    4. fourth number, to how many different wikipedia did this user add this link.

    If the third number or the fourth number are high with respect to the first or the second, then that means that the user has at least a preference for using that link. Be careful with other statistics from these numbers (e.g. good user who adds a lot of links). If there are more statistics that would be useful, please notify me, and I will have a look if I can get the info out of the database and report it. This data is available in real-time on IRC.

    Poking COIBot

    When adding {{LinkSummary}}, {{UserSummary}} and/or {{IPSummary}} templates to WT:WPSPAM, WT:SBL, WT:SWL and User:COIBot/Poke (the latter for privileged editors) COIBot will generate linkreports for the domains, and userreports for users and IPs.


    Discussion

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist&oldid=772017944"