Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring

Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard
This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule. See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report. If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page. You must notify any user you have reported. You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so. You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. Additional notes When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first. The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from. Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection. Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed. Definition of edit warring Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring. Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR) An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions. Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.
Click here to create a new report

User:Sapphorain reported by User:ZH8000 (Result: Both blocked 48 hours)

Page

Lausanne (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Sapphorain (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 07:57, 16 December 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 815652839 by ZH8000 (talk)"
2. 21:48, 15 December 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 815597375 by ZH8000 (talk)Please stop with that"

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 05:14, 16 December 2017 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Lausanne. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

1. 14:52, 16 December 2017 (UTC) "/* de: Lausannen */"

Comments:

This is an ongoing dispute since two months ago. ZH8000 (talk) 14:54, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

• Both editors blocked – for a period of 48 hours — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 15:54, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

User:92.228.153.156 reported by User:TastyPoutine (Result: Already blocked)

Page: Petrovsky Park (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 92.228.153.156 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), 80.171.173.13 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [1]
2. [2]
3. [3]
4. [4]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

Comments:
Please note this is the globally banned editor Tobias Conradi. Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/77.179.37.199

• Already blocked by RickinBaltimore. Mz7 (talk) 04:44, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

User:2607:FEA8:BD20:E40:AD3F:C124:931A:58AD reported by User:Tgeorgescu (Result: Blocked 31 hours)

Page

The Exodus (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

2607:FEA8:BD20:E40:AD3F:C124:931A:58AD (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 02:54, 17 December 2017 (UTC) ""
2. 01:57, 17 December 2017 (UTC) ""
3. 01:11, 17 December 2017 (UTC) ""
4. 16:16, 16 December 2017 (UTC) ""
5. 15:22, 16 December 2017 (UTC) ""

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 01:34, 17 December 2017 (UTC) "3RR warning"
2. 02:23, 17 December 2017 (UTC) "Notifying about edit warring noticeboard discussion. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

1. 02:33, 17 December 2017 (UTC) "edit war"

Comments:

The IP is acting against consensus. The matter has been discussed to death, as mentioned on talk page. The IP is jumping, a range block for 2607:FEA8:BD20:E40:: might be needed. Tgeorgescu (talk) 03:07, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

The IP is now at six of these edits in under 24 hours. Alephb (talk) 04:31, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 31 hours I've also placed a range block on Special:Contributions/2607:fea8:bd20:e40::/64. Mz7 (talk) 04:44, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

84.176.239.161 reported by User:DrFleischman (Result: Page protected)

Page: George Papadopoulos (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 84.176.239.161 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [5]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [6]
2. [7]
3. [8]
4. [9]
5. [10]
6. [11]
7. [12]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [13]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [14]

Comments:

These are BLP vios. The editor wants to include content about Mr. Papadopoulos that isn't supported by the cited source. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 05:53, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

The edits are not BLP violations. Not sure what you think is negative about speaking four languages or why it even requires attribution and it seems awfully petty to edit war over. Certainly, there is no BLP exemption for edit warring. --DHeyward (talk) 07:56, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

DHeyward, this is really moot since the IP was blocked and the page was semi-protected, but you really ought to familiarize yourself better with WP:BLP and WP:3RRNO before inserting yourself in discussions like this. I mean that sincerely, not snarkily. Read the policies and you'll see you're mistaken on both counts. (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 17:21, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

What's moot is your comment. None of the actions were taken when I commented and your CRYBLP is a lame excuse for edit warring. That didn't change. Please refamiliarize yourself with the relevant policies. It's not proper to accuse editors of BLP violations when it's such a stretch. The article being in agreement with a self-published source is virtually never a BLP violation and considering how harmless it is, it meets criteria for WP:SELFPUB and can be said in Wikipedia's voice. --DHeyward (talk) 20:08, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Never admit defeat! It's a battle I tell you! ARRRRRR!!! ;-) (FWIW, I didn't mean that your comment was too late, I meant that the issue had already been resolved by the time I replied to your comment.) (I am not watching this page, so please ping me if you want my attention.) --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 21:33, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Says the person locked in a 10 revert grudge match with an IP over whether the article says "He speaks four languages" or "He says he speaks four languages." --DHeyward (talk) 00:00, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

• Page protected — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 01:42, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

User:86.0.180.37 reported by User:Kansas Bear (Result: Blocked 48 hours)

Page: Persecution of Christians (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 86.0.180.37 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [15]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. 11 Dec
2. 12 Dec
3. 13 Dec
4. 14 Dec
5. 15 Dec
6. 17 Dec
7. 17 Dec

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [16]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: The IP has not chosen to use the talk page instead using personal attacks.

Comments:

The IP has been edit warring since 11 Dec, issuing personal attacks like;

• it is clear that a biased islamaphobic christian edited this page with the intent of defaming islam and muslims. under the section "under islamic rule" several incorrect facts were given that were referenced by bigoted right wing websites
• a islamaphobic liar keeps editing the page with false information
• some idiot islamaphobe keeps editing the page with lies to defame islam
• a stupid right wing christian liar keeps editing the page
• as stated numerous times a biased liar keeps editing the page
  

I believe this says it all. --Kansas Bear (talk) 22:31, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 48 hours — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 01:38, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

User:Asteriset reported by User:Kansas Bear (Result: Blocked 1 week)

Page: Battle of Mohi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Asteriset (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [17]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [18]
2. [19]
3. [20]
4. [21]
5. [22]
6. [23]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [24]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [25]

Comments:

User:Asteriset has been edit warring on Battle of Mohi for quite some time. First stating that "Please note this book a reference work not an academical work and thus not authoritative on the subject", then "This is not for the talk page, this is not an authoritative source (nothing to do with the author), end of story", then accuses me of logging out to edit war, "None academical work, take it with the talk page if you want. This is your last warning (previous edits without username)". I have started a discussion AND added another source by Timothy May who also states "heavy casualties" at Sajo River/Mohi.--Kansas Bear (talk) 01:31, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

•  Administrator note @Kansas Bear: Why does it look like you're edit warring as well? Please stop, or I will be forced to block you as well. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 01:40, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
• Blocked – for a period of 1 week — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 01:43, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

User:Sagenode reported by User:Meters (Result: Blocked 24 hours)

Page: Production car speed record (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Sagenode (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: Not all the edits are identical, but they all involve adding various Koenigsegg cars or removing mention of a competitor's car. [26] [27]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [28] Dec 17
2. [29] Dec 11
3. [30] Dec 11
4. [31] Nov 27
5. [32] Nov 26
6. [33] Nov 22
7. [34] Nov 22
8. [35] Nov 20
9. [36] Nov 19
10. [37] Nov 19
11. [38] Nov 19
12. [39] Nov 19
13. [40] Nov 19
14. [41] Nov 19
15. [42] Nov 19
16. [43] Nov 19
17. [44] Nov 16

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:

1. [45] Nov 27 Formal EW warning
2. [46] Dec 13 Level 4 warning with informal EW warning after Sagenode made two more reverts. The issue of edit warring has also been mentioned in various talk page threads, and Sagenode is well aware of it since he preemtively left a malformed edit warring warning on my talk page [47] after he made yet another revert to the page [48]. This edit was undone by user:Drachentötbär, not by me.

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: There has been extensive recent talk page discussion of whether the Koenigsegg car the IP wants listed meets Wikipedia's inclusion criteria (as a production car) for this list, and whether the inclusion criteria should be tweaked to allow the inclusion of the Koenigsegg car and other similar special cases.:

1. Talk:Production car speed record#Proposed rule change
2. Talk:Production car speed record#Agera RS should be included until list rules are (re)defined
3. Talk:Production car speed record#Latest backwards and forward on main list discussion
4. Talk:Production car speed record#Definition of the minimum requirements for being production car
5. Talk:Production car speed record#Suggested updated production car and test specification definition/list rules
6. Talk:Production car speed record#What is a production car really?
7. Talk:Production car speed record#Veyron speed limiter
8. Talk:Production car speed record#Agera RS
9. Talk:Production car speed record#Cars excluded from the list together with basic reason

This topic of the number of cars required to qualify as a production car has been repeatedly discussed previously on the article talk page, and the issue of Koenigsegg models not having enough cars produced to qualify as a production cars has been explicitly mentioned in several of those threads (2012–2015):

1. Talk:Production car speed record/Archive 3#Fastest non-production, but street legal cars.
2. Talk:Production car speed record/Archive 3#Cars excluded from the list together with basic reason
3. Talk:Production car speed record/Archive 3#Koenigsegg Agera
4. Talk:Production car speed record/Archive 3#Koenigsegg CCR
5. Talk:Production car speed record/Archive 3#Production car - question to consider - number of cars required to qualify
6. Talk:Production car speed record/Archive 3#Page protected/20 car limit - new discussion
7. Talk:Production car speed record/Archive 2#Hennessey Venom GT
8. Talk:Production car speed record/Archive 2#Questioning the 20 car limit
9. Talk:Production car speed record/Archive 2#McLaren vs. Koenigsegg

Comments:

Sagenode is an SPA on the topic of including Koenigsegg cars in this list. He participates in the talk page discussions, but simply refuses to accept other editors' opinions. The supposed consensus for inclusion he refers to is mainly other SPAs,including the Koenigsegg employee responsible for publicizing the Koenigsegg car and its recent speed run (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard/Archive 122#Production car speed record). Multiple editors have undone his additions and multiple editors have agreed on the talk page that the Koenigsegg car does not meet the current inclusion criteria. Sagenode has been told that if the current discussions on changing the criteria are successful the Koenigsegg car will be re-evaluated. He's reverted three times since his EW warning, and his continued WP:IDHT suggests that he will not stop. Meters (talk) 07:35, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 24 hours — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 15:03, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

User:Floating philosopher reported by User:AntanO (Result: Page protected)

Page: Islam in Sri Lanka (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Floating philosopher (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. diff
2. diff
3. diff

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

Comments:
I have already reported at WP:AN/I and request to talk at articles user page, and requested help too. See Talk:Islam in Sri Lanka --AntanO 07:45, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Reply:
I have already read these guidelines and have attended to minority views covered in the sources. I believe my edit is justified as earlier sources contradict published scientific information. My edit is the only rational way to present these contents. I am open to debate on the talk page. User talk:Floating Philosopher —Preceding undated comment added 07:56, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

• Page protected — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 14:59, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

User:Floating philosopher reported by User:Pharaoh of the Wizards (Result: Blocked 48 hours)

Page

Sri Lankan Moors (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

Floating philosopher (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

• Latest revision as of 06:51, 18 December 2017
• Revision as of 17:32, 17 December 2017
• Revision as of 12:15, 17 December 2017
• Revision as of 21:36, 20 November 2017
• Revision as of 19:03, 20 November 2017

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

Here and also by other editors.

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

Comments:

The Edit warring is across pages in Sri Lankan Moors ,Islam in Sri Lanka and Sri Lankan Tamils with at least 3 editors.Most of his edits are Reverts includes slow motion edit warring as per WP:EW where it says "The three-revert rule is a convenient limit for occasions when an edit war is happening fairly quickly, but it is not a definition of "edit warring", and it is perfectly possible to edit war without breaking the three-revert rule, or even coming close to doing so.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:03, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Reply:

My edit to this page is connected and relevant to the page "Islam in Sri Lanka". I have provided justification for this in the comments to my edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Floating philosopher (talk • contribs) 07:58, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

• Blocked – for a period of 48 hours — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 15:00, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

User:94.177.75.219 reported by User:Akocsg (Result: Blocked)

Page: Qashqai people (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 94.177.75.219 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) (and probably related 188.158.114.141 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log))

Previous version reverted to: [diff preferred, link permitted]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. diff1
2. diff2
3. diff3
4. diff4 (the other IP account)

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [49]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: diff

Comments:
The IP user reverted three times despite the info being sourced. He is adamantly negating the information provided by the reliable source. Akocsg (talk) 14:00, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

another false and dishonest report by this guy.this is 4-5th time he report me while actually he's the one who started edit warring and disruptive edits. in Turkish people he was warned to stop his edits [50] but he did it as usual [51] [52] [53] . same in Qashqai people did this unsourced and made-up change [54] reverted by [55] then started edit warring [56] [57] [58] even used an ip to break 3rr [59] . this is his 3rd time:

• 15 November 2017 MSGJ (talk | contribs) blocked Akocsg (talk | contribs) with an expiration time of 24 hours (account creation blocked) (Edit warring)
• 15 November 2017 MSGJ (talk | contribs) changed block settings for Akocsg (talk | contribs) with an expiration time of 72 hours (account creation blocked) (Edit warring - change expiry to 72 hours)
• 30 November 2017 EdJohnston (talk | contribs) blocked Akocsg (talk | contribs) with an expiration time of 10 days (account creation blocked) (Edit warring: at Dastan per a complaint at WP:AN3. Pattern of long term warring)

and a long history of edit warring [60] 94.177.75.219 (talk) 14:10, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

he even use offensive comments [61] [62]94.177.75.219 (talk) 14:14, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

The other IP user is not related with me in any way. And this seems quite suspicious that this IP user above puts forward much unrelated (and partially quite old) stuff without being part of it himself. Quite strange. The edit is not unsourced, quite the contrary. The source is given in the article, has been again put forward in the talk page, while this IP account openly ignores it and now even lies here, twisting facts. Akocsg (talk) 14:16, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

The accusation of offensive comments is also a blatant lie and manipulation. This is by him (apparently another IP belonging to the same user), calling me a "troll account": [63]. Akocsg (talk) 14:19, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

actually it's you who ignores the source and quoted text.there is no "to a lesser extent" in source.it's your made-up term.i quoted the text of source in talk page and you are still ignoring it and try to inject your own words in article. i proved your 3rr break and edit warring.and thiz is not your first time.you repeated same things in Turkish people. and troll is your behavior while you call me dumb and stupid which are pure insults.94.177.75.219 (talk) 14:25, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

quote:"Like most present-day tribal confederacies in Persia, the Il-e Qašqāʾi is a conglomeration of clans of different ethnic origins, Lori, Kurdish, Arab and Turkic. But most of the Qašqāʾi are of Turkic origin, and almost all of them speak a Western Ghuz Turkic dialect which they call Turki. The Qašqāʾi" nothing about "lesser extent" in text.94.177.75.219 (talk) 14:33, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

• Blocked — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 14:59, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

@Coffee: are you sure you read my comments too? this one-sided decision would be very bad for your admin status.94.177.76.53 (talk) 19:12, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

It seems possible that 94.177.76.53 (talk · contribs) is actually 94.177.75.219 (talk · contribs) evading his one-month block. EdJohnston (talk) 19:26, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

User:117.173.161.82 reported by User:Thewolfchild (Result: Blocked)

Page 1: Martadinata-class frigate (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: 117.173.161.82 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [64]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [65]
2. [66]
3. [67]
4. [68]

Page 2: Sigma-class corvette (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Previous version reverted to:[69]

1. [70]
2. [71]
3. [72]
4. [73]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [74]

Diff of 2nd edit warring / 3RR warning: [75] (these follow x4 standard warnings, for wp:or and disruptive editing, up to level 4)

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [76] (List of current ships of the United States Navy)

DIff of attempt to enage user in discussion on their own talk page" [77] (instead of the Martadinata-class frigate & Sigma-class corvette article talk pages)

Diff of user being notified of 3RRNB report: [78]

Comments:
This began with a series of unexplained, messy edits on the List of current ships of the United States Navy article, made by RJDVZYR (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). After checking them, I found an error that I reverted, but he immediately reverted me, no explanation or source provided. I reverted again, with "see talk" in the edit summary. While writing on the talk page, this IP user started to manually implement the edits I had reverted. I suspected this user logged out to edit as an IP. I took note of the odd username, (it was new as of today), but the page had been edited previously by a nearly identical username: RJDZVYR (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Recently on that page there have been some edit-warring disputes, (not involving me) but involving the second noted username as well as another IP address, from the same town in China as the IP address that is the subject of this report. I posted to both registered user talkpages asking if they knew each other, but there has been no reply. I have also tried posting to the IP user's talk page to try and engage in discussion, but still no reply there either. This person is not new here, nor are they new to these kinds of antics. I would appreciate it if an admin whould take a look and intervene. Thanks - ^theWOLFchild 15:12, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

• Blocked — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 15:23, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

User:Akocsg reported by User:94.177.76.53 (Result: Filer blocked)

Page: Turkish people (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Akocsg (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to: [79]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [80]
2. [81]
3. [82]
4. [83]
5. [84]

Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [link]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [diff]

Comments:
other neutral users reverted his edits [85] [86] and repeated same things in Turkification and reverted by a neutral user [87]94.177.76.53 (talk) 19:21, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

User:LouisAragon & User:EtienneDolet plz confirm my edits are right.94.177.76.53 (talk) 19:24, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

@Coffee: since the IP is clearly block evading an Coffee was the blocking admin. But the IP may have a point... the first edit by Akocsg was primarily a revert of [88]. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:27, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

@EvergreenFir: This IP account is a block evader and is using manipulative examples to get other users blocked which do not fit his views. The edit you have shown as an example was already reverted. No case of edit-warring here. Since obviously this is a sock-puppet user, a user check or something should be done. Akocsg (talk) 19:32, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

(edit conflict) @Akocsg: It's rather clear to me that this edit was a revert of this one. That means your subsequent 3 reverts puts you at 4 reverts within a 15 hours period. Moreover, the reverts cannot be brushed aside as WP:EVADE or WP:3RRNO since the IP was not socking at the time of the reverts from what I can tell. Rather, it seems you bother were edit warring. EvergreenFir (talk) 19:36, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

In this article he made disruptive edits again, even though I settled the minor matter contructively with another user. Akocsg (talk) 19:34, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

User:EdJohnston yeah, i evaded my block because coffee's decision is one-sided and unfair.[89] have you guys read my comments or not????i didn't break 3rr while Akocsg broke both 3rr and no edit warring.funny he can do anything he wants but i can't just because he has account.this new report is a result of bad decision by coffe.94.177.76.53 (talk) 19:35, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

It's also quite suspicious that this block evading IP account is specifically calling for the help of certain mods/admins. This should really be investigated. Akocsg (talk) 19:37, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

And he keeps on with his disruptive edits and deleting of sourced content, here. Akocsg (talk) 19:40, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Blocked – 1 month. Filer has admitted their block evasion, so they receive the same duration as their previous IP. If you think the original decision was unfair, make an unblock request on your talk page and admins will review it. EdJohnston (talk) 23:18, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

Anmccaff reported by User:C. W. Gilmore (Result: )

Jefferson Davis Park, Washington [
Anmccaff (talk)

Previous version reverted to: [90]

Diffs of the user's reverts:

1. [91]
2. [92]
3. [93]
4. [94]

Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [95]

Comments:
I have never done this before, but I have tried everything to get the other user to come to the Talk page before making changes that don't match the cited source. The source [96] states: "Another granite marker proclaiming the road's designation as the Jefferson Davis Highway was erected at the time in Vancouver, Wash., at the highway's southern terminus. It was quietly removed by city officials four years ago and now rests in a cemetery shed there, but publicity over the bill has brought its mothballing to light and stirred a contentious debate there about whether it should be restored." The source says nothing about "unelected official" or "surreptitiously" that keeps getting added. C. W. Gilmore (talk) 00:17, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

• The editor had previously been warned about such actions [97] by K.e.coffman but it did not seem to help. C. W. Gilmore (talk) 00:28, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

User:BlaccCrab reported by User:SNUGGUMS (Result: )

Page

Walk on Water (Eminem song) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

User being reported

BlaccCrab (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Previous version reverted to

Diffs of the user's reverts

1. 23:51, 18 December 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 816041881 by Davey2010 (talk) I provided a reliable source. Ss112 agreed with me. You're salty because it's making him look bad so you're gasping at straws to undo factual info."
2. 19:07, 18 December 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 816021323 by Davey2010 (talk) Nope. It provided the reliable source and it remains a fact. You have to take it to the talk page, not me. I provided the info, you want it gone."
3. 18:07, 18 December 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 815931700 by SNUGGUMS (talk) For 1 week then nosedived out of the top 50. It's notable. Leave it alone."
4. 01:31, 18 December 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 815902887 by SNUGGUMS (talk) It's not excessive detail pointing out how it's his first lead in 18 years not to be a hit.. Second, it's a fact, which can be seen in his chart history."

Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning

1. 23:08, 18 December 2017 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule. (TW)"

Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page

1. 00:02, 19 December 2017 (UTC) on Talk:Walk on Water (Eminem song)

Comments:

User inserts WP:SYNTH and insists on maintaining it even after being told that assertion wasn't in provided reference. Snuggums (talk / edits) 00:26, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

I undid my last revert and took the discussion to the talk page. Neither of you bothered responding to my last response. Now you want to report me to admins. Have fun with that. BlaccCrab (talk) 00:32, 19 December 2017 (UTC)