This is a Wikipediauser talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Graeme_Bartlett/archive_33.
Request of restoration of draft:Engr Babalola Olatunji
Hello please i am contacting you in regard of two things, first my userpage Tommygogd that was brought down and my first draft article Draft:Engr Babalola Olatunji this article was done neutrally , and i have been told to do declare a conflict of interest on my user page which i did, i do not understand why the article was brought down and also my page, this is my first article ever and i am doing this on a neutral point , is it possible for a person who does not have any contribution or whatsover to be paid for creating article, please i am pleading kindly restore the page so i can add more citation or for other contributor to be able to contribute to it , i am already getting discouraged because this is my first contribution and i have put so much effort in it than to be deleted, even if i am not given the priviledge to edit it , at least other contributor can for the sake of my effort.Tommygogd (talk). and if not please kindly restore to my userspace so i can continue to use it to pratice. but I wish you know this can make some of us trying to put effort in Wikipedia sad.
@Tommygogd: I restored the draft Draft:Babalola Olatunji because I failed to notice that it had previously been deleted by Anthony Bradbury as advertising. I see that you have asked Anthony Bradbury for restore. So that is the appropriate procedure. If you rewrite, to improve the tone - do not include text like: "a popular news post", "furthered his career". Also leave off the training courses attended, as that is for a curriculum vitae. Also biographical details such as family should be properly referenced, otherwise it suggests that you know the person and my be outing previously unpublished information. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:39, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Graeme Bartlett: Thanks a lot, you are the most intelligent ones out of all the people that has been denying my post all this while , your explanation and guidline now makes me know all the mistake i made in the article , i cant thank you enought for this insight , because i still wondered what i did wrong in the article , thanks a lot Graeme Bartlett God bless you for this little kinded Tips you gave me , please kindly help me request that Anthony Bradbury restore the draft if you can because he has not responded to me please i will be so glad. i will also do all this information you gave me now and clean up the article better with this guideline Tommygogd (talk) Tommygogd (talk) 22:40, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Graeme Bartlett: hi , i have messaged Anthony Bradbury but he has not replied or even do anything on my comment on his talk page , and according to the wikipedia rules i guess any one of the admin can undo whatever other admin do if you see reason to, please kindly help in restoring my user page and this article if you can please, i dont want to start the article from scratch again after so much work i had put into this, i just want to take my time and edit the article properly till i get it right , then i can now be contributing more to wikipedia on my own without stress , if i have to start all over again i might still make mistake but my previous version will allow me to make corrections and see where my mistakes are because of next time, i am using this to learn and to contribute to wikipedia. thanks , i will be very glad if you can do something about it Tommygogd (talk) 20:36, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I would not normally reverse the actions of another administrator outside the policy reasons. I might do so if the action was obviously a mistake. WP:DRV is for the situation you have, where the administrator does not respond. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:27, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the alert. I don't think it is that serious, but I have removed the info. I think that Wikipedia counts as "media". Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:26, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
File:Zupan's Markets logo.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Zupan's Markets logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. βplicit 14:49, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Request to draftify some Kirby pages for transwikiing
Thanks for uploading File:GUARD logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Request to Undelete Lillee Jean a/k/a Lillee Jean Trueman
Any hope of restoring the wonderful work you were doing on https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft_talk:Lillee_Jean_Trueman&action=edit&redlink=1 - she has alot of news worthy articles on her advocacy for cyberbullying (something she is invested in, being a victim herself), as well as environmental issues, and advocacy against anti-semitism? I know someone asked for her page to be created under her stage name Lillee Jean, but I remembered that you had an amazing draft you were working on.
Done β as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you are not Mattm80, and are being paid to promote this person read WP:PAID. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:38, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What was the most complete revision of the article Blink the Mole (I think it was an article before it became a redirect)? 2005-Fan (talk) 23:37, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Blink is the Professor's nephew. He loves to be underground, citing "fresh-air-a-phobia" as his reason, along with being a mole. He is a friendly character who helps Spyro defeat Red the Dragon. Blink is sometimes called "Blinky". Blink is strong and he can do punches and butt bounces. Blink has strong lasers that can defeat most enemies. If the enemies are strong, he can just simply bomb them or zap them with a laser. Blink also has first person targeting goggles, which can detect enemies and can zoom in up to five times than normal (which helps with aiming lasers as well). Blink might say things like "Can I explore below ground?" or "You know I love it down there."
Hi. I hope you are doing well. I was going through my old edits, and realised I had posted quite a few messages to your talkpage. When I read(ed) them again in your archives, it seems that I was kind of rude, and mean to you. I dont remember the reason behind it though. I want to apologise for that. I am truly, very sorry for my behaviour in the past. I hope I didnt mean it back then. I also hope you forgive me. Regards, βusernamekiran (talk) 21:14, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
βusernamekiran (talk) 21:24, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello? βusernamekiran (talk) 21:33, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. Thanks. It can be seen in /archive 28. There are many snappy comments from me (I thinkmthey are snappy, not sure how I intended them when I originally posted them). βusernamekiran (talk) 21:56, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Wojciech Karlowski
Back in March you edited the article on Wojciech Karlowski, rewording a sentence that you considered puffery. It was indeed puffery, and it's not the only example in the article. On checking the history I saw that the article was created by Msciszewianka, and she has made a very high proportion of the edits. According to her user page her married name is Dorota Karlowska, a name that strongly suggests who she is married to, without proving it, of course. In the past I've seen tags on articles suggesting the creator is too closely associated with the subject, but I can't find an example now, and I don't know how to put such a tag. Do you have any advice? Incidentally, although Professor Karlowski is not totally insignificant, I'm surprised that he was considered notable enough to have his own article. Athel cb (talk) 16:47, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Athel cb: you may be looking for these tags: {{coi}} {{connected editor}} which give these banners:
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
seems to fit the bill. I have added it, and also made a comment on the talk page of the article. Athel cb (talk) 06:54, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Crystal systems
Hi!
Yes, I am a native Russian speaker. I am not a professional chemisist but respect the subject starting from my classes in the school. As for my recent articles, yes, I have translated many of them from the Russian wiki and added some other info that I managed to find. I do believe that these articles need some professional review, so I am thankful that you are around to fix the mess that I my leave unchecked.
I would also like to add visuals, but I don't know whom to ask for help.
@Lamro: well I am not a professional, but a keen amateur. to draw, look out for ChemSketch. You can load up a smiles string and it can produce a 2D or 3D diagram. Unfortunately it does not output .svg format. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:14, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Digital Journal wikpedia page restored and deleted?
Hello Graeme, for some reason the Digital Journal wikipedia page was deleted. You restored it, but it was deleted by someone again. It was here - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Journal
Could you kindly assist in restoring? There is no reason it should be deleted.
Not done β this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took placeΒ at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital Journal (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, PremeditatedΒ ChaosΒ (talkΒ Β·contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. @Chrishogg18: there was a second debate. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:51, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It has been moved to here. It can be deleted again. 2005-Fan (talk) 23:53, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:Malate Catholic School logo.jpeg
β
Thanks for uploading File:Malate Catholic School logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Thank you -- is it possible to draftify the two aforementioned article: Animals in The Legend of Zelda series and The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker weapons and items? 2005-Fan (talk) 11:20, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, Boomerang (Legend of Zelda) was the one (looks like I posted a wikibooks link by accident, sorry.) The pages are now here and here, so the drafts are safe to delete. 2005-Fan (talk) 23:09, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Alright they've been moved over to here and here. Feel free to delete the drafts. 2005-Fan (talk) 20:12, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Is it ok if you draftify Gossip Stone (I'm going to move it to the Zelda franchise strategy guide wikibook). 2005-Fan (talk) 17:21, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Okay it's been moved to here. Feel free to delete the draft. 2005-Fan (talk) 22:56, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Atomic spectra: why no principal series article?
Hello. I notice that you are the main author of 3 articles on atomic spectroscopy: sharp series, diffuse series and fundamental series, which gave their names to s, d and f orbitals respectively. However there seems to be no article at all on principal series, which gave its name to p orbitals. Do you know if there is any particular reason for the absence of an article on principal series, or is it just that no one happened to get around to writing one? Dirac66 (talk) 16:22, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Dirac66: The reason that I did not write it was that principal series was already existing to a redirect to an unrelated topic. I did not want to just add a useless stub. I thought about writing using the title Principal series (spectroscopy) and added it to my to-do list User:Graeme Bartlett/to do under Spectra topics. You can see the list of things I planned to write on and in the history what I actually did. But I have not done much of that list as I started on geology and now chemistry writings. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:44, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I have started a new article Principal series (spectroscopy). As for the redirect from Principal series, I have converted it into a disambiguation page, pointing both to the new spectroscopy article and to the math article where it pointed already. The reader can choose either. Dirac66 (talk) 21:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for moving it to my user space. Admittedly it was a lot worse than I was hoping and the A7 was certainly justified but I just finished recreating it at Etorouji Shiono. Thanks again for the help! Link20XX (talk) 22:16, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
While I am asking you to undelete things, can you undelete Draft:Hula Fulla Dance, which was deleted via G13? Thanks. Link20XX (talk) 05:37, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done β as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:40, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Graeme,
I'm Rachel the only female electrical engineer born and raised in Knoydart in Scotland. It's an isolated peninsula, which is not connected to UK's main grid. I saw this battery technology being prototype tested in Knoydart in 2014 an to be honest I have an emotional bond with this battery type as it supported and isolated island community such as ours, which was suffering from fuel poverty. I created this article after conducting lot of literature research and getting in touch with the original inventors. I would be very grateful to you if you can give me some tips to further improve this. You had commented indicating the the article reads like an advertisement. I would highly appreciate if you can indicate which parts you are concerned about, so I can improve it. I started this as a little project, so I can help wikipedia as a reviewer in the future. So this is great experience for me. I have added a problems and criticism section, which I plan to populate in next couple of weeks.
Many Thanks and Thankyou very much in advance.
Rachel
Rachel.stop.extinction (talk) 14:15, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Rachel.stop.extinction: I assume you are talking about Alkali sulfur liquid battery. Some things to think about: this is an encyclopedia, so put in there what our readers want to know. For example I want to know what substances are used in the electrodes and chemicals and their reactions. I want to know how it can respond within 1 ms to power line changes. How can it be scalable in power? How is it compare to vanadium flow batteries? Some inappropriate text is the bit on what it is "not using". Instead say what it is using. There is a theoretical energy density, but give the actual density for this implementation. "crucial to fight the present climate crisis" is puffery on at least two fronts. Most of the "Invention, awards and inventor" section is promotional in tone. It would be excessive to have that big quote from Society for the Environment, but what is actually factual in that quote should be described in the article. There is quite a lot of "according to" and x "reports". You don't need to mention that unless the statement is controversial, or is opinion. Otherwise just leave it to the reference to identify where the information came from. Also the "Edinburgh energy firm powers up with EDF in Perth innovation challenge" does not mention most of what is in the text it references. (incl 100 million tons). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:37, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Graeme Bartlett: Yes, that was the page I was referring to .Thanks so much for your comments and now it's very clear to me. I agree with all your comments. I will remove all ambiguous and unnecessary text. If you ever get a chance kindly review the page again once I notify you after the changes...Many Thanks Rachel.stop.extinction (talk) 15:10, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Graeme Bartlett: Hi Graeme, thanks again for your guidance to improve this page. I have done a research over a month and have improved the page, addressing all the points you have highlighted above. I have collected, verified and validated a range of technical information about the battery, which the inventors agreed to share with me for sharing publicly. I have removed company names and quotes from other websites. In addition I have removed everything I could think of which were promotional in tone. Would highly appreciate if could do a review and give me some feedback. No hurry and please do when you get a chance ...Many Thanks in advance . Rachel.stop.extinction (talk) 15:16, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm working with an editor on IRC chat about this page now. I agree that it's probably unsuitable content, but I noticed you deleted it and then restored it. --Salimfadhley (talk) 15:18, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It was deleted by Fastily and Liz due to expired draft. I restored it due to request by CompVisExp, not because I thought it was good. It appears that CompVisExp did edit it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:06, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Graeme Bartlett. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Inverse chirp Z-transform, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Graeme Bartlett. I am Yeung Wing Ching Candy, currently a year 3 student majoring in geology in the University of Hong Kong. I am now working on a Wikipedia page about Chile Ridge, which is a divergent plate boundary located between the Nazca Plate and Antarctic Plate. It is really my pleasure to meet you. βΒ Preceding unsigned comment added by Candyyeung168 (talk β’ contribs)
Disambiguation link notification for September 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zellerite, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acicular.
If you click the link to the draft, you should be able to create it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:09, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If I create the draft can you help me for moving the page
I will look at it. But if it is advertising or for a non-notable topic then it will not be accepted. In fact the article is create protected. So I won't be moving it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:23, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You can move that page you are an Administrator and the page is Extended confirmed protected
It appears that you are the banned person. So that means you are not permitted to edit here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:57, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Request to reset Draft:The Holy Kingdom of Judah page pre bias opinion rejection
I recently had a page I was editing restored after a justified deletion. I made an edit and summited it for review. The reviewer deleted references then rejected my submission for lack of reference. The deleted references where material and pertinent to why the person was due acceptance.The reviewer unnecessarily destroyed work and now the research is lost. Please restore the page back to piror the bias rejection or if possible review the last submitted page. Thank you. SalihaRosio. βΒ Preceding unsigned comment added by SalihaRosio (talk β’ contribs) 23:44, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@SalihaRosio: What appears to be deleted was links to Wikipedia, Wiktionary, and online dictionary, and another online encyclopedia. Since these links are just giving more info on the words you attached them to, they are not really references on The Holy Kingdom of Judah. Instead you should link to the Wikipedia page with [[ ]]. We probably don't need external dictionary links, but if the term is obscure, just explain it in your article. You can link to Slave Coast of West Africa instead of a Britannica article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:21, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That article is by a well-known LTA that we forgot to globally lock last month. Do you wish to take responsibility for the article existing in mainspace? DMacks (talk) 22:27, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@DMacks: it is a quite dubious substance. So perhaps I should do a TNT on it! I will take responsibility. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:48, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Good solution, thanks. DMacks (talk) 20:25, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:Room 13 cover.jpg
β
Thanks for uploading File:Room 13 cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hi Graeme. I'm not quite sure what's going on at File:DingiriBandaWijetunga 1.jpg. This edit overwrote the previously uploaded non-free file with a completely different file and this edit removed the copyright license all together. It might be that the editor-in-question thinks that photos found on an official Sri Lankan government webiste are PD or otherwise freely licensed, but that's not what the source website says. Is a split needed here or can the file just be tagged with {{furd}} to get rid of the replaced version? -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:43, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
the previous image appears to be a crop of File:DingiriBandaWijetunga.jpg. So it means there are three non-free images. Two will have to be deleted. I wouldn't bother with a split, just delete.Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:52, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough and thanks for taking a look. I'll tagged the overwritten file with {{furd}}. Just for reference, there is now also File:DBW-S.jpg which is missing a rationale and is orphaned. If neither of those things are addressed, it's going to end up deleted as well. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:46, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Radio data
I just noticed this now: you mentioned that radiolab talked about broadcasting KSC format data... do you recall which episode? Seems like something that should be added to the article. Maury Markowitz (talk) 14:20, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, this is excellent. Definitely worth a link in both pages.! Maury Markowitz (talk) 20:19, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I had a project to add only 500 words to the article. I am not sure if it will be possible for me to add more words to the article at this pointHARA0201 (talk) 14:46, 24 November 2021 (UTC).[reply]
No problem, we are volunteers, and do not have to do something. Adding 500 words to an article will only qualify for DYK for the smallest stub expansions. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 19:52, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
GHS phrases by module now
I have introduced Module:GHS phrases at the backside of {{H-phrases}} and {{P-phrases}}. There should be no change wrt previous usage & behaviour: same result in the 2600 articles. Also, some new options are introduced, such as:
@DePiep: THanks for the heads up. For that Potassium_ferrioxalate I tried 501c, but it did not work - perhaps 501c is a propriety code. But there seems to be no way to add the extra text as I thought you mentioned. 501=text doesnot work as I hoped. the idea is the extra text only appears when you hover. I also included your omit rules in the javascript translator (User:Graeme Bartlett/monobook.js P-phrasefmt and H-phrasefmt) I use to make the template content from more freeform input. I am responsible for some of the duplicates, but I decided I should look at what I put in there, rather than try to automate a deduplicate. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:14, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Per the GHS setup, the codes are governed by the UN, so we can not add our own text nor propriety text. Full 2021 source is
This is also where the Omit Rules are from (i.e., they are formal too).
- |P264=text is not implemented yet, but anyway does not allow free text. It will only allow for substitute text like
|P264=hands into P264: "Wash ... thoroughly after handling."
- Doing duplicates is no death penalty. We have computers to resolve these. Don't worry. And: let the (future) deduplicate do the job, don't spend time on this.
- I don't understand your "more freeform input" js, but if a module adjustment is needed, I'll hear. -DePiep (talk) 07:34, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
My .js lets me paste text from other reference lists, and it converts it to the | separated list for the templates to use. It strips out the H and P, but it appears that that is no longer needed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:43, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Great. And: yes, H and P now preferably kept prefixed. -DePiep (talk) 08:20, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
-FYI, another new feature: input is less restricted. "bad" charaters are thrown out, whitespace is removed:
Ok it's been moved to Wikibooks, feel free to delete it 2005-Fan (talk) 04:26, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DYK nomination of Chile Ridge
Hello! Your submission of Chile Ridge at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! CMD (talk) 12:53, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Graeme. Would you mind taking a peek at File:Chucky (Child's Play).jpg and check whether it needs a split. The file was recently over written with a different image of the same character. Thanks. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:51, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well it only needs a split if someone wants to use the old image. Otherwise it can be removed from view/deleted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:53, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. Thanks for clarifying. One possible issue though is that the older versions will eventually be deleted per WP:F5 which is almost always not an issue because the versions are essentially the same. In this case, though, the "old file" has been essentially removed and made orphaned by being replaced by a "new different file" which means most likely the original uploader isn't going to end up notified by {{Di-orphaned fair use-notice}} since bots don't tend to issue notifications for {{Orphaned non-free revisions}}. It appears from the file page's history that there might've been some other attempts at overwriting that have been reverted; so, perhaps that will happen this time around as well. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:23, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It was overwritten yet again by the same editor with another different version of Chucky character, but then was reverted back to its original version by another editor. -- Marchjuly (talk) 09:43, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What was the latest revision of this article? A Wayback Machine capture shows that a revision of it had quite a bit of content. 2005-Fan (talk) 04:44, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
On 7 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Silicification, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that silicification can produce opal(example pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Silicification. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Silicification), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Chile Ridge
On 8 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Chile Ridge, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that the Chile Ridge has a slab window? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chile Ridge. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Chile Ridge), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Hello! Your submission of Loess Plateau at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 04:29, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What was the original text of this article? 2005-Fan (talk) 00:05, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
@2005-Fan: The text had this (crediting ZeWrestler and Cuahl):[reply]
The following is a list of key items in the Final Fantasy series of role playing games produced by Square Enix (originally Square Co., Ltd.). Key Items are objects that can be or is used, but only at specific points in the storyline. Usually a key item has only one purpose in the game and is only expendable at a certain point, and are usually part of the plotline development of the game.
In Final Fantasy VI, the slave crown is a mechanical device used by the Empire to control the wearer's thoughts. When the game begins, the character Terra is wearing a slave crown, but after she comes in contact with the EsperTritoch, she falls unconscious and gets nursed by a man who removes this device, surprised to find how swiftly she has recovered from it.
There are some 200 chemboxes to update (petscan, YMMV).
Would it help if I deprecate the bad parameters already? |EUClass, RPhrases, SPhrases, RSPhrases=. The articles with 'bad' input then will end up in Category:Pages using Chembox with unknown parametersΒ (0) (with other such errors). Acceptable for some months, I guess. -DePiep (talk) 08:54, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think that will help, as no one is adding these values any more. I think that we should be able to empty these out by the end of next year, and possibly within a couple of months. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:06, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
OK for me. BTW it's not about adding, but about listing articles that use them. Of course we have other ways to find those articles. -DePiep (talk) 11:17, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Flagging may help find empty parameters like |EUClass= as they probably wont trigger the DHS data cat. But a search with regex can probably find itGraeme Bartlett (talk) 11:26, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Polite Review Request
Hello Graeme, happy upcoming holidays! In the past, you approved some of the articles I created. I'm currently ill and on early holidays and getting back into article creation/editing. I was wondering if you have time to approve this article I created: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Henson_(photographer) - Any help is greatly apprecaited. Thank you! Falconik123 (talk) 04:57, 16 December 2021 (BST)
G4 deletions
Please undelete Template:R3 and Template:R4. The G4 criterion did not apply as my recreation of the page had nothing in common with the version that was previously deleted at TfD. * Pppery *it has begun... 17:48, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I thought it was a very bad idea to recreate these templates while the delete of the other Rx templates is still in progress. By having those redirect, it causes the history of many pages to show the speeddy delete notice. It would be much much better to just show a red link. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:37, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That might be a valid argument at RfD, but it doesn't make the G4 deletion any more acceptable, because redirects to speedy deletion templates and r-phrase templates have nothing in common. My reasoning for recreating them was that most speedy deletion templates have a redirect from their two-letter code when there's nothing else competing for that name. * Pppery *it has begun... 21:12, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
GKFX had already removed those templates from the list, so that's irrelevant. Anyway, it's clear this discussion is going nowhere, so ... * Pppery *it has begun... 21:21, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Template:R3. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. * Pppery *it has begun... 21:21, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
DYK nomination of Machine learning in earth sciences
Hello! Your submission of Dharwar Craton at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SL93 (talk) 01:02, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Graeme Bartlett, the reviewer has agreed to allow the nomination to go forwardβplease address the issues they raised in their initial review. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:02, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Graeme Bartlett, it has been more than seven days since I posted the above, and you haven't yet taken any action on this nomination. Please give it your attention right away if you wish to continue with it. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:06, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There's a concern about your new hook proposal. Please stop by to respond to it. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:03, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I really shouldn't need to ping you every time there is a response needed on one of your nominations, but you perennially don't respond unless pinged and the reviewer didn't ping you, so letting you know that the ball is back in your court. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:32, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
CSD deletion rationale for drafts
Hello, Graeme,
I've started to look over expiring drafts and deleting ones that appear to be an attempt at creating a social media profile like you'd see on Facebook. They aren't article drafts in any way shape or form, but they also aren't really "advertising". They appear to be the result of a very new editor not knowing what an encyclopedia is or what it is for.
The article title is always their name and they have information like their parent's names, their high school and what they want to do after their schooling. So, they have autobiographical information like you would have on a Linked In or Facebook profile but they are often the editor's only edit on Wikipedia. So, somewhere they got the idea that they should create a personal Wikipedia page. I've marked them both as "test edits" and "promotional". If there is even a hint of an actual draft of an article, I leave it to be deleted via G13. I sincerely doubt that any of these editors will return and make a request at WP:REFUND for the return of their draft but I wanted to mention doing this to the admins who regular patrol REFUND in case you come across this combination of deletion rationales. I wish we had a CSD rationale of "attempt at a social media profile page" but we don't so this is my temporary solution. If you have strong objections to this approach, let me know. They just don't seem like pages that should be restored as regular G13s because they aren't article drafts that will ever be moved to main space.
Thanks and I hope you have a great holiday season! LizRead!Talk! 02:54, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Well this sounds also like too much information disclosure from a minor. If I notice an article on someone under 18, I will decline to restore, especially if it's an autobiography. I will treat such a G2 G11 deletion as final. Maybe even needs an oversight. Happy Christmas to you too @Liz:. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:47, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merry Christmas
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!
Hello Graeme Bartlett, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. Happy editing, RV (talk) 04:14, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This is a minor issue, but you have made a number of recent edits with the edit summary "clean stripmarker error", such as this one. I don't understand what this means for editors. Should Template:CO2 not be used? Has it been or is it about to be deprecated? Or should it just not be used in some specific circumstances? Does the same apply to other companion templates, such as Template:CH4? β Epipelagic (talk) 00:15, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Epipelagic: These templates are currently incompatible with cite templates and are causing that stripmarker error in the references section. I have proposed that the CO2 template should not use CHEM2 template, as that is what is causing the "templatestyles stripmarker in" error. But the same issue is in all those templates like H2O H3O CH4. The discussion that triggers these edits is at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Chemistry#Help needed, so please join in. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:34, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that. I'm aware these templates don't work in cite templates, but many of the reversals you made didn't involve cite templates. β Epipelagic (talk) 02:09, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I use a regular expression matcher that changes all of them. {{CO2}} to CO<sub>2</sub>. I really dislike chem2 (and chem1) because of many problems, so at any convenient opportunity I will change them to use sub mark up. If CO2 template changes to not use chem2 template, then this change will not be needed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:31, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Graeme Bartlett! I've nominated you (along with all other active admins) to receive a solstice season gift from the WMF. Talk page stalkers are invited to comment at the nomination. Enjoy! Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}}β―talk ~~~~~
Protected over a decade. 80.5.88.70 (talk) 10:18, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I will leave it protected. There were over 1000000 views in the last month, and troublesome editing in the last week. Please use the talk page to suggest changes. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:25, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
chem2 and find
Hello. Have you tried using ctrl-F to search for a chemical formula recently? chem2 test: CoCl3, chem: CoCl 3. Chem2 works for me, but not chem. Christian75 (talk) 16:19, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @Christian75: it does appear to work now. I suppose I can stop objecting to chem2 on that basis (which caused me problems on the Langbeinites page when I wanted to see if a substance was on the list or not). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:28, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Clearly fails WP:NCHURCH. No mention to be found anywhere of this denomination outside of its website; no mention in the 2009 Melton's encyclopedia of American religions or in Google books or Google scholar.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Catholic Church of America until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.
When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.
Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.
We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.
On 5 January 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Loess Plateau, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that one of the largest and thickest loess plateaus in the world is the Loess Plateau(pictured) in China? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Loess Plateau. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Loess Plateau), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
hmm, my guess would be probably not? Just off memory, I think it got that number over a 24-hour span instead of a half-day hook, so it only counts for half the number of views per hour (the threshold is 416+2β3). theleekycauldron (talk β’ contribs) (they/she) 09:30, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A barnstar for you!
The Technical Barnstar
For fixing my userpage - a solution to a problem I should never have created in the first place! Thank you and have a great 2022. LugnutsFire Walk with Me 08:16, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. LizRead!Talk! 23:00, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ironic to see this message to the user talk page of the admin who is responsible for many draft restorations. Ah, Twinkle could use some AI component so it knows who it is posting notices to. LizRead!Talk! 00:04, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Liz, If I want it back I will restore it myself. In this case it was for Manhattan, NYC. who did not know how to make it non-promotional. See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Joy Bridenbaker. But I don't care enough about the subject matter to improve it to article standard myself. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:48, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, the parameter is added after a space, which violates MOS:REFSPACE when used with references. Any idea how to fix that? ~~~~ User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:18, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@1234qwer1234qwer4: Sorry about that - I worked out we need to use BoilingPt_ref or MeltingPt_ref which adds before the space. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:44, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again; I finally got to fixing almost 200 other cases of this now. I did notice that it still did not change the output at Special:Diff/1080823423, though. 1234qwer1234qwer4 17:54, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I guess now the table looks pretty much overloaded with text.
I know that lactic group is sometimes abbreviated as La. (CoLa, MnLa2, etc.)
Maybe using it will make the table more comfortable for readers?
Cheerz!
Lamro (talk) 08:29, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well La means lanthanum, so that would be confusing, but I agree there is a lot of text. Perhaps it can just list elements, with oxidation state if important - eg Fe(II). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:58, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It has been added to Wikibooks. I also found a use for the draft article, and I made it a redirect to the Zelda series page, which has gameplay info on Dungeon navigation 2005-Fan (talk) 15:21, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Few more undeletion requests
There's so much content on Wikipedia, and some old articles understandably slip my radar. Requesting the undeletion:
Paste here if articles are very short. 2005-Fan (talk) 18:27, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK here are some of them minus templates and categories. I think you have seen Cataquack before. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:26, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Naval Piranha has three attacks, the first of which is a ramming attack. In the second attack, Naval shoots Nipper spores out of his mouth which become Nippers if they touch the ground to make Yoshi's fight more difficult. For Naval's last attack, he sends his vines to attack Yoshi.
A very easy way to beat him is to have an egg, carefully aim at the piranha plant (which becomes Naval Pirahna), and destroy it. Kamek will appear, scream "OH MY!!!!!!!!!!!" and run away. You then get the key.
Naval Piranha also appears in the video game Tetris Attack, as the second of four bosses. He appeared as a villain along with Hookbill the Koopa, while Raphael Raven had turned good.
Naval Piranha is not to be confused with the Lava Piranha boss from Paper Mario, despite the two looking almost identical.
They are the kind of koopa that have two electric spikes on their back. They come in different varieties: blue and red. The blue ones launch their electric shells at you, the red ones climb walls and ceilings. The best way to defeat a blue Electrokoopa is to wait for its shell to launch and stomp it. Otherwise, be in long distance and hose it down with its shell off and when the shell returns, the blue Electrokoopa will get shocked and die.
They caused a lot of trouble in Pinna Park which caused a lack of visitors. One green one slept on a door at the top of the ferris wheel causing it to spin. If you open from underneath, the green Electrokoopa will fly into the ocean.
To defeat Hookbill, one must pelt him with eggs until he falls over, and then pound under his belly. This must be done three times to win the battle. Hookbill has several different attacks. First, he will crawl to you on all fours, causing you to drop Baby Mario if he touches you. When you pound his stomach, he will withdraw into his shell and start bouncing around before proceeding to his next attack. After being wounded once, he gets up on two legs and starts running, again causing you to lose control of Baby Mario if he comes in contact with you. For his final attack, he will jump and attempt to body slam you. Once Hookbill is defeated, he falls off of the edge.
Fierce Deity's Mask credit 68.210.248.127; 81.152.83.56; Red Phoenix (usurped); Chris Russo
The Fierce Deity's Mask is a fictional mask in the video game The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask. It is the most powerful and final mask that can be collected in the game.
This mask is that of a warrior god, and has an unknown past. In the Japanese version of the game, it is referred to as the mask of an ogre god; while the name 'Oni Link', derived from this, is a fanon term for Link's transformation at this point, there is no similar reference in the English versions of the game. When Link is on the moon, he is met by four moon kids. Link gives his twenty normal masks to these four, and then meets a fifth moon kid. When the fifth one sees that Link has no masks, he offers to give Link a powerful mask: Fierce Deity's Mask. The powers of this mask are rumored to be as horrible as those of Majora's Mask, and when Link puts it on he grows into a large being resembling the adult Link from Ocarina of Time, but with a bluish-silver tunic, no pupils, and a giant, double-helix, two-handed sword. This sword can shoot magic orbs and is very useful against the three forms of Majora. It is equally effective against the other bosses in game, but cannot be used any further than the boss battles. Link's Fierce Deity form is considered to be the most powerful form that he has ever taken so far, while at the same time, his most mysterious form.
They appear at Gelato Beach where they are an irritating pest. Once spotted, they follow you around until they throw you high into the air. A fun way to beat them is to lure one, and then run to a tree and quickly climb in it. The cataquack will slam headfirst into the tree and will immediately be capsized. Only the red cataquacks damage you. If you lure a Cataquack to a sand bud and capsize it followed by your watering of the sand bud, it will fly into the air, and die landing on it's back (It turns to sand upon impact).
In Mario Kart: Double Dash!!, the Cataquacks are obstacles in the Peach Beach course and they'll flip you in the air. They can be capsized by a powerful weapon.
Thank you as always! I might've forgot if I did request Cataquack seeing how many articles I've requested before. 2005-Fan (talk) 21:40, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you -- I'm still awaiting an importer to get to adding the Rings article to Wikibooks. Also, was there ever text on the Book of Mudora, Blind the Thief, and Arrghus articles? 2005-Fan (talk) 22:27, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
All of them were only ever redirects. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:45, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! I wanted to drop a quick note for all of our AFC participants; nothing huge and fancy like a newsletter, but a few points of interest.
AFCH will now show live previews of the comment to be left on a decline.
The template {{db-afc-move}} has been created - this template is similar to {{db-move}} when there is a redirect in the way of an acceptance, but specifically tells the patrolling admin to let you (the draft reviewer) take care of the actual move.
Short and sweet, but there's always more to discuss at WT:AFC. Stop on by, maybe review a draft on the way? Whether you're one of our top reviewers, or haven't reviewed in a while, I want to thank you for helping out in the past and in the future. Cheers, Primefac, via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
thank you for add (chemspider) to 29-Norlanosterol
BTW, Norcycloartenol is reffered "31-norcycloartenol" in some paper[1][2] or "29-norcycloartenol" in othor paper[3][4] (SAME chemical), the reason is that zoology and botany are different in numbering of steroids side chain, 241 to 28, 242 to 29, can we just use Norcycloartenol as wiki article title if there is no ambiguations like 19-Norlanosterol to 29-Norlanosterol--Htmlzycq (talk) 14:03, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes you can use a name like "Norcycloartenol". If that is the usual name for the substance then we can use it for a title. It may need an explanation in the lead if there are other substances that might use the name too. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:42, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
References
^Zheng, S; Ma, Z; Ye, J; Wang, G; Wang, R; Zhou, H; Zeng, S; Jiang, H (1 January 2014). "Determination of three triterpene alcohols in rat plasma after oral administration of pollen of Brassica campestris based on the utilization of fetal bovine serum as surrogate matrix". Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences. 944: 11β7. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2013.10.044. PMIDΒ 24291607.
^Bellamine, A; Mangla, AT; Dennis, AL; Nes, WD; Waterman, MR (January 2001). "Structural requirements for substrate recognition of Mycobacterium tuberculosis 14 alpha-demethylase: implications for sterol biosynthesis". Journal of lipid research. 42 (1): 128β36. PMIDΒ 11160374.
^Bayer, M; Proksch, P; Felsner, I; Brenden, H; Kohne, Z; Walli, R; Duong, TN; GΓΆtz, C; Krutmann, J; Grether-Beck, S (November 2011). "Photoprotection against UVAR: effective triterpenoids require a lipid raft stabilizing chemical structure". Experimental dermatology. 20 (11): 955β8. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0625.2011.01350.x. PMIDΒ 21824200.
^Hartmann, MA; Perret, AM; Carde, JP; Cassagne, C; Moreau, P (8 August 2002). "Inhibition of the sterol pathway in leek seedlings impairs phosphatidylserine and glucosylceramide synthesis but triggers an accumulation of triacylglycerols". Biochimica et biophysica acta. 1583 (3): 285β96. doi:10.1016/s1388-1981(02)00249-4. PMIDΒ 12176396.
Orphaned non-free image File:Bigg Boss Malayalam poster 3.jpg
β
Thanks for uploading File:Bigg Boss Malayalam poster 3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Orphaned non-free image File:Bigg Boss Malayalam poster 3.jpg
β
Thanks for uploading File:Bigg Boss Malayalam poster 3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hello, I see on your user page that you use JSTOR and I'd like to know more about your experience. By my calculations, a good 70Β % of the main JSTOR content is now available for everyone at Internet Archive Scholar, with full text search provided e.g. at https://scholar.archive.org/ . The service is still in beta, but I've used it for some source-finding and it seems quite usable to me; I wonder whether that's just my experience. If you have a chance, the next time you'd be looking for a source on Google Scholar or JSTOR or similar, to perform the same search on IA scholar instead, I'd be curious to hear how it ends up. Thanks, Nemo 19:07, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Orphaned non-free image File:Bigg Boss Malayalam poster 3.jpg
β
Thanks for uploading File:Bigg Boss Malayalam poster 3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Is it ok if you undelete the page history of this? it had some content before & might be eligible for Wikibooks inclusion. 2005-Fan (talk) 14:54, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank youΒ :) I was also wondering about Donkey Kong's animal buddies and List of non-Kremling Donkey Kong enemies page history. i think i have it as a user subpage, but page history might have revisions that had some info that was cut or trimmed for "game guide" reasons (and "game guide" is like for Wikibooks) 2005-Fan (talk) 22:12, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done β as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:25, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you -- I went ahead and requested Mbrickn on Wikibooks for transwiki. There's still some other Metroid articles that I might get to some day. 2005-Fan (talk) 01:35, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I didn't see this earlier, but what I meant is that this was archived by the bot after the IP I linked edited it, only their last contribution/vandalism was reverted and I'm really not sure if reverting the vandalised report in the archive (basically deleting it) and then reverting the active reports to before they were vandalised will not accidentally cause the bot to do something unexpected. β 2804:F14:C060:8A01:44CA:6E00:BBE0:33A (talk) 09:34, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:
Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period
Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.
22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
You've got mail
Hello, Graeme Bartlett. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Boris Vainshtein, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crystallographer.
Thanks for uploading File:Strands Recommender Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Hey there Graeme Bartlett, I'd like to wish you a happy adminship anniversary! Congratulations on your special day, and thank you for all the contributions you've made.
Hello. I was fine if you protected Sing 2 indefinitely, without a date selected. There's been a lot of persistent disruptive editing going on in that page. I think it's better if it was protected until its previous date, which you selected indefinite. Also when all that is finished, don't forget to add {{pp-protected}}. Thanks. 2601:204:203:5110:EC57:FF5B:301:C9F3 (talk) 16:52, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Indefinite was an accident as I changed the number in the wrong box on my protect page. I am hoping a bot will add protection templates! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:21, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, about the bot (MusikBot II), the owner of it is currently attempting to migrate it to ToolForge, and is therefore partially down from time to time, and I'm not sure when its coming back (Im currently having to sort the removal side of pp templates myself, no way i can also keep up with new protections of pages). For now, if you protect a page, please also add the template yourself, so the bot has less catch-up once its back. Aidan9382(talk) 09:44, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well between you and MusikBot II, all but one were tagged, so I have now applied the silver lock to the last one. So MusikBot II is more able than we thought. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:01, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Monolayers has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. γΒ Forbes72Β |Β TalkΒ γ 13:25, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for May 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Porous carbon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Annealing.
Edmund Donovan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
Ooops. Template run amok I guess since you restored it. Sorry about that. Feel free to delete this if you wish. StarMississippi 21:36, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for getting it to the right person. I was trying to figure out who'd requested the refund but logs and I don't always get along. StarMississippi 22:00, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Thanks for frequently handling my REFUNDs - I really appreciate it. I am coming directly to your talk page to ask about File:Mercy for Animals logo.svg. The current logo is clearly {{PD-textlogo}}, but one of the upload comments states that the company has changed their logo. I don't feel like REFUND is the correct venue to request this. For all I know, the previous revisions are nonfree in which case this undeletion request is definitely not "uncontroversial". Would you be able to make that judgement call/undelete the revisions if they can be? Thank you so much! HouseBlastertalk 15:36, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Graeme Bartlett, is it possible that I can restore or create the article? I found a new independent reference here: [3], by Carlos Ferrera Cuesta, Professor in the Department of Contemporary History at the Autonomous University of Madrid (UAM), and here are new sources and reliable references that could be added to the article Patxi Xabier Lezama Perier: [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]
Greetings. βΒ Preceding unsigned comment added by Prothomastic (talk β’ contribs) 19:08, 19 May 2022 (UTC) βΒ Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.84.3.172 (talk) [reply]
The page has been create protected by user:SlimVirgin and it has been deleted many times, so I will not be actioning this request. Commenting on your source, the first one appears to not be a reliable source. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:37, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify
Would it be ok if the following be draftified to be added over to Wikibooks?
Okay so Items has been made into a redirect. The draft pages can be deleted as they can be found here, here, here, and here. 2005-Fan (talk) 10:20, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@2005-Fan: Did you get a copy of the items page? I was interrupted before I moved that one and responded here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:58, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This edit by an IP seems as though it may merit some level of review. Sorry if I'm overreacting, and thanks! DonIago (talk) 02:51, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I just reverted. It is just someone trying to contact the subject of the article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:14, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Given the nature of the original edit I wasn't sure whether a RevDel was merited. Happy editing! DonIago (talk) 18:47, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Subject: Request for review of the deletion decision dated 26 April 2022 of Mr Sandstein- Case of Purshottam Lal
Dear Reviewing Authority,
(1) The Article on me - Purshottam Lal- created by Ms Sneha and approved by Wikipedia for publication on 27 January 2022 was deleted under the orders of Mr Sandstein ( herein after referred to as theΒ deleting administrator , or DA in short)Β dated 26 April 2022 following a deletion discussion lasting 2 weeks. The final order said thatΒ there was lack of notability and not enough secondary sources.
(2) Normally, the creator of the page-Ms Sneha-should have made the review petition. However, since she is blocked for reasons presumably nothing to do with theΒ Article on me, she cannot communicate , and hence this review request by me.
(3) As per advice on Wikipedia site , I first took up the matter with the DAΒ and sent him a note on 20th MayΒ 2022 on his Talk Page. He very kindly responded and wroteΒ Β : "Mr. Lal, consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purshottam Lal was that there is not enough significant coverage about you in reliable secondary sources that are independent of you. That is needed for an article about you. Could you please read our guideline page WP:BIO and then tell me what the three best pieces of such coverage about you are? Sandstein 17:23, 20 May 2022 (UTC)"
(4) Thus, in his response, he did not mention the " notability " aspect which was the main reason for deletion.
(5) Since three independent References had been asked for and since most of my work as a writer and as a police officer had taken place in pre-internet era, I searched for feedback and comments of READERS of my articles in the print media since 1992 ( the year I started my writing endeavourΒ ;Β more than 115 articles haveΒ since appeared in important newspapers, and four books published , all released by two different Governors of Punjab state ), and also newspaper reports of my work as a senior police officer , and after scanning them ,Β sent the sameΒ to the DAΒ on 25 May 2022 in PDF format,Β uploaded on Wikimedia. It , inter-alia, contained 31 feedbacks in respect of 20 articles of mine.( The link to these additiinal scanned References uploaded onΒ Wikimedia is as follows:
I requested the DAΒ to allow me to includeΒ these or some of them as References in the Article if more independent References were required. Similar request was made in respect of References for police work.
A synopsis of these additional References was provided to the DAΒ for a quick glance and the same is reproduced below for the same purpose.
Synopsis:
Β Serial No.1
The Tribune
Main article: Flying saucers: an abiding mystery. August 18, 1994
FeedbackΒ : September 07, 1994 by A.D. Amar, Edison ( USA)Β
Main article: The babu and the bureaucratΒ : May 25, 2011
FeedbackΒ Β : June 10, 2011 by L.R. Sharma
Serial No.15
The Tribune
Main article: Fudging the DNA: December 9, 2011
FeedbackΒ : December 15, 2011 by SC Chabba
Serial No. 16
The Tribune
Main article: Corrupt and clever: February 1, 2012
FeedbackΒ : February 4, 2012 by SC ChabbaΒ
Serial No. 17
The Tribune
Main article:Β Touching the feetΒ : June 6, 2014
FeedbackΒ : June 24, 2014 by MickeyΒ Bansal
Serial No. 18
The TribuneΒ
Main article: The Achillesβ heel: November 3, 2015
FeedbackΒ : November 6, 2015 byΒ Brish Bhan Ghaloti
Serial No. 19
The TribuneΒ
Main articleΒ : Sweet and sour: January 15, 2016
FeedbackΒ : January 29, 2016 by S. Kumar
Serial No. 20
The Tribune
Main article: Punjab must prevent terror from spreading: November 21, 2018
FeedbackΒ : November 22, 2018 by LR Sharma
Serial No. 21
The Sunday Times of India, Lucknow: August 15, 1993
News regarding award of Presidentβs Police MedalΒ for Distinguished Service on the occasion of Independence Day 1993.
Serial No. 22Β Β
The Tribune: January 9, 2005: Jadoo ka chiraag by Dona Suri
( A satire on senior IPS officers of Punjab)Β
Note: Pshtt refers to me ( portrays work and character in a veiled manner).Β
Serial No. 23
Dainik Jagran ( Hindi )Β Β : April 5, 2006Β
Comment on work
Serial No. 24
Dainik Jagran ( Hindi )Β : April 11, 2006
Comment on work
Serial No.25
The Tribune , December 1, 2006-Β
DGP Lal retires:Β
Serial No.26
Dainik Jagran ( Hindi ) , November 30, 2006
An interview on retirement.
I also provided to the DAΒ 58 available onlineΒ References to my articles and books and TV discussions as per list below( some were common to those in the deleted Article ):
I had the impression that the Wikipedia's first efforts are to retain the Article by making improvement etc if possible. However, the DA finally replied on 26 MayΒ 2022 videΒ which he did not touch upon this aspect at all, and commented that the three most important References mentioned by me in the deleted Article were not sufficient to justify an Article on me.
(6) I understand AfD (Article for Deletion )is concerned with the substance of the Article whereas DR ( Deletion Review )Β is concerned withΒ the process by which the decision was reached.
(7) The following breachesΒ of due process took place in my case which deserve consideration .
(A) During the deletion discussion , the creator of the Article , Ms Sneha, was not allowed to participate on the ground that she had beenΒ blocked. In fact, two posts made by her from her mobile data ( which was not blocked at that time, since only her IP address was blocked ) giving clarifications on points raised by certain esteemed members of the Wikipedia community were struck off. Thus, the creator of the Article, went totally unrepresented and unheard. This is a breach of the principles of natural justice and fair play. At least, for this case, her block should have been removed so that her view point could also have been available for consideration.
(B) MrΒ Bonadea started the deletion discussion on 11 April 2022. He later blocked IPA address of Ms Sneha, creator of the Article, for the so-called sock-puppeting . When she put her viewpoints - twice- during the discussion through her mobile data, Mr Bonadea blocked herΒ mobile data connectivity, too. He also struck off posts so put by Ms Sneha. Thus, in this case an inevitable clash of interest took placeΒ leading to denial of the opportunity of being heard , by virtue of both actions - deletion discussion and blocking- having been initiated /orderedΒ by the same party i.e. Mr Bonadea. This is against the principles of natural justice in any society/country governed by the rule of law. The blocking decision should not have been taken by Mr Bonadea as he knew that he had alreadyΒ initiated the deletion discussion. He ought to have referred the blocking decision to some other Administrator. Thus, due process of fairness and unprejudiced discussion haveΒ been violated in this case.
(C ) At least two members who participated inΒ the discussion majorly misread the Article. They presumed that I had been the Head of the Punjab Police Force. No such claim was made in the Article. It rather said in the IntroductionΒ : " ....retired from the rank of Director General of Police". Thus, it was the rank which was mentioned, and not the actual post. There are a few posts in the Punjab PoliceΒ , all manned by DG rank officers. Though the two gentlemen spoke in my favour, yet their impression was wrong , and I pointed it out at the very first instance to Mr Geoffrey Lane of the Wikipedia in an email dated 28 April 2022 (info-en-v@wikimedia.org) .Β Such a misreading by not only these two esteemed members of the WP community but by some other participants also- like the one inquiring about the President's Police Medal for Distinguished Service in respect of which clarification was provided by the creator of the Article ,the same , however,having beenΒ being struck off-Β shows lack of proper understanding and appreciation of the contents of the ArticleΒ by some of the esteemedΒ participants. The number of participants , most of them not well-informed about the Indian system of policing except two, was also too less, about 5 or 6. ThisΒ type of discussion amounted to a process not germane to a meaningful discussion , laying too much stress on the so-called independent References which , though present among the list of References, were not found adequate by the participants and ultimately byΒ the DA. Instead of looking at the totality of the material available , they rather looked only at a part of it resulting in miscarriage of justice.
(DΒ ) The DA'sΒ final note dated 26 MayΒ 2022 on his Talk Page says that the first twoΒ References mentioned speakΒ ofΒ my book , and not ofΒ me. This is, to say the least, not a very correct interpretation. When somebody is talking about my book ,Β he is naturally talking about me also as the book is my creation. About the third Reference, he mentioned it was by an organisation to which I belong and hence was not independent. First of all, he could not appreciate that the Reference was picked up by the creator by theΒ internet search and mentioned as suchΒ just to show my qualities as a senior police officer ,Β and referred to my past association with the organisation ,Β and not the present one as I am no longer a member of it. Secondly, I was associated with it but had no control over it. The Reference also mentions the names of the former Governor Punjab and former Chief Secretary Punjab just to show that I was, at one time in the past,Β Β in the categoryΒ of highly notable persons in the administration of theΒ Punjab government , thereby supplementing my notability.
(EΒ ) The DA'sΒ final note dated 26 May 2022 is silent on the suggestion to allow, for improving the Article,Β the use ofΒ 31 feedbacks provided in respect of 20 articles of mine in PDF format uploaded on Wikimedia ,Β Β asΒ independent secondary sources for my writing work, which PDF fileΒ contained some References for my police work also ( all relating to pre-internet era). Perhaps these or some of them could have been considered for addition so that the Article could have beenΒ improved and saved , as I understand that the first endeavour of the Wikipedia , as a positive step, is to retain the Article by improving it. Pre-internet References would naturally be in paper format, and only their scanned copies can be attached. Some 58Β Β Β Β References ( out of which some might be common to the list already in the deleted Article)Β also sent for my articles and TV discusdions for possible use in improving the Article were also not touched upon by the DA in his final note of 26 May 2022. ( Please see the link and listΒ ofΒ scanned References and other 58 in paragraph (5) above).
(F )Β The Article was approved on 27 January 2022 by Wikipedia ( Mr John B 123- more than 1,89,000 edits and more than 248 active Articles to his credit) after satisfying about notability and References. No new facts came to lightΒ after that. No falsity of any information was ever alleged. Hence, in the absence of any fresh material, it is not fair to declare the same Article as ineligble on grounds of lack of notability and inadequacy of References, though later the DAΒ in his note of 20 May 2022 on his Talk Page did not raise the issue of notability , and only of secondary independent References. Thus , there has been an apparent lack of consistency . I think an Article duly approved by an esteemed and experienced Wikipedian-AdministratorΒ should not be put up for deletion discussion unless fresh damaging material became available.
(G )Β I have suffered loss of face by the deletion effected 3 months after its publication after due approval . I am now more than 75 years of age. My endeavour to write the fifthΒ book- Origin of the Aryans-Β which was half-way through, is stalled due to this upsetting development.
Keeping in view the totality of circumstances, it is requested that the Article may kindly be restored. It can, however, be improved by adding more References or even amending it.Β
Thanking you,
Yours sincerely,
Purshottam Lal
You have confused me with such a huge answer. That is why the request was for the three best sources. Three sources have to be reliable (so not a letter to the editor), have to be substantial (several paragraphs written on the subject), and independent (not written by the subject or their employer, or advertiser). WP:Autobiography is something to read, but it probably won't make you happy. PS your upload to commons was deleted, so we can't see it. Anyway WP:DRV is the place to contest, and please give a succinct reason to overturn the deletion. At WP:REFUND we could turn the page to a draft. But if it has been recreated many times or protected against creation, then a deletion review is best. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:46, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Graeme, while declining undeletion of Draft:Atkins (album), you used the templated response that said Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service... while the draft was never part of AfC. Isn't the message misleading when you use it for non-AfC drafts? Jay(talk) 05:53, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is the UND template with "2nd" parameter. Perhaps we can reword this template. In this situation I probably won't examine the draft, just the history to see that nothing at all was done. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:33, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I have reworded it. But now it is inappropriate for userspace drafts. There are less of those however. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:21, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Userify request
Hello Graeme Bartlett! I want to ask whether there was any meaningful content in the now-deleted article Tista (manga). If there was any meaningful content, could you userify the article to User:Link20XX/Tista (manga) so I can improve it? If there was nothing, that's fine; it was deleted over a decade ago so I don't have any high expectations. Link20XX (talk) 17:36, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You deleted this page as part of a set of redirects to the 9/11 victims list. I'm not sure whether there were intervening edits, but as of yesterday this wasn't a redirect - it was an article (albeit short) with references. Could you please restore this? Nikkimaria (talk) 02:50, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello sir, and I hope you don't find this message to your inconvenience.
I just want to ask if you would be able to review my draft article: Draft:List of largest galaxies. An earlier version of this list has been created way back 2015, but got deleted in 2018 due to many issues regarding the authenticity of the numbers there. In my newly created draft is my attempt to revive that list and resolve those issues, but I do still need to have a second opinion from anyone regarding it. Hopefully you heed my request, especially from someone like you.
Any thoughts, criticisms, or suggestions you might raise would be gladly appreciated. Thanks! SkyFlubbler (talk) 14:30, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Surely this article can be unprotected now? It's been protected for a decade. 31.55.134.161 (talk) 16:02, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Β Not done As the article is still being heavily edited, and there are few edit requests on the talk page, and those have not been actioned. You can ask for a second official opinion at WP:RFPP. I suspect an edit war will break out over whether she is Albanian, Kosovan, or Yugoslavian. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:35, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Imperial College London monotone logo.jpg listed for discussion
Draft:International Dialogue for Environmental Action
Hi, about a month ago I asked for the undeletion of the page "International Dialogue for Environmental Action". You asked me to rewrite it as a draft which I did, but it wasn't reviewed yet.
Do you mind reviewing it to see if it's good to be re-published as a regular page? Thanks! Mriogrech (talk) 13:12, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for July 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited HP-505, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ptosis.
Hi Graeme, it's nice to meet you. I've been working on a draft for HB Antwerp, a diamond company currently mentioned in the Sewelo article. I noticed that you are an active member of WP:MINING and thought you might be interested in taking a look. Do you think it's ready to be included? Looking forward to your thoughts, Margxx (talk) 12:19, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Draftified β the page has been restored to the draft space at [[{{{2}}}]]. Draft:List of Kirby powers Draft:Green Greens Draft:Fountain of Dreams (Kirby). Also Pop Star (Kirby series) done. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:08, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject.
Not done β this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took placeΒ at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Digital Journal (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, PremeditatedΒ ChaosΒ (talkΒ Β· contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. @Chrishogg18: there was a second debate. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:51, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Template:Star Wars drafts has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:42, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Dharwar Craton at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 01:16, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Template:Fluorides has been nominated for merging with Template:Fluorine compounds. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. ~~~~
