Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as CSD G6), or in articles for deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other XfD processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process.
This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions on the template or on your talk page.
Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.
To contest deletions that have have already been discussed (in particular, at Articles for deletion), or that are likely to be controversial, please make a request at Wikipedia:Deletion review instead. |
Deletion discussions |
---|
|
Articles |
Templates and modules |
Files |
Categories |
Redirects |
Miscellany |
Speedy deletion |
Proposed deletion |
Request to userify
Could the following deleted page be placed in my userspace please?
- Antagony
- Autobot Clone
- Blood (Transformers)
- Bruticus
- Fangry
- Flamewar (Transformers)
- Gunrunner (Transformers)
- King Atlas (Transformers)
- Oil Slick (Transformers)
- Over-Run
- Overcast (Transformers)]
- Polar Claw
- Road Rocket (Transformers)
- Rotorbolt
- Scalpel (Transformers)
- Splashdown (Transformers)
- Steel Wind
- Triceradon
- Windrazor
Thanks Mathewignash (talk) 18:14, 10 July 2011 (UTC)
- Some of them that I looked at randomly were deleted per AFD. For what purpose do you want them restored? --B (talk) 04:19, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- They are all AFDs. I want to work on them to try to improve them. Mathewignash (talk) 09:15, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- The concerns don't seem to be quality of the articles - they seem to be that minor characters are definitely not notable. Though another admin may feel differently, my inclination is that this should go to DRV - the consensus seems to be that these are not going to be notable regardless of the level of effort you put into them. --B (talk) 13:43, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- My plan was merge some of the less-notable characters down to their team pages, and move the plot summary to episode listings, but I wanted access to the orignals to help write. If it's to much work, I'm sorry. Whatever you can do is fine. It would just help me having to re-research the characters.Mathewignash (talk) 01:36, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- This might contribute to the notability discussion. CycloneGU (talk) 02:24, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Listen, I wrote the majority of the content of those pages, and I don't have copies of my work. I request you make it available to me please. You can userify, or email it to me. Mathewignash (talk) 23:39, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- This might contribute to the notability discussion. CycloneGU (talk) 02:24, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- My plan was merge some of the less-notable characters down to their team pages, and move the plot summary to episode listings, but I wanted access to the orignals to help write. If it's to much work, I'm sorry. Whatever you can do is fine. It would just help me having to re-research the characters.Mathewignash (talk) 01:36, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- The concerns don't seem to be quality of the articles - they seem to be that minor characters are definitely not notable. Though another admin may feel differently, my inclination is that this should go to DRV - the consensus seems to be that these are not going to be notable regardless of the level of effort you put into them. --B (talk) 13:43, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- They are all AFDs. I want to work on them to try to improve them. Mathewignash (talk) 09:15, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
File:Destroy All Humans box art for the PlayStation 2.jpg
- File:Destroy All Humans box art for the PlayStation 2.jpg · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Destroy All Humans!. -Zundark (talk) 08:06, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
File:ScratchYourName.jpg
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Scratch Your Name. -Zundark (talk) 08:45, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
File:AcornArthur110desktopsmall.png
Should be used in History of the graphical user interface and History of RISC OS. -Trevj (talk) 11:16, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Apparently originally included with this edit.
- Done Restored & FuR's added - leaving it up to the requester to put in the articles as he deems appropriate. 02:05, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you Now included in articles. --Trevj (talk) 06:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
William Douglas (Bill) King
required revisions regarding significance of subject to be made and references to be supplied -WmDKing (talk) 11:16, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- Not done First, you should read WP:AUTOBIO. Second, there was zero notability established, and more importantly proven by third party reliable sources. You will not be able to write an article about yourself, in part due to your own conflict of interest (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:58, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
File:St. Joseph's College, Geelong Logo.svg
- File:St. Joseph's College, Geelong Logo.svg · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in St Joseph's College, Geelong. -Zundark (talk) 12:28, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
File:Souryam.jpg
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Souryam. -Zundark (talk) 15:09, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- Done January (talk) 16:52, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
Spotonised
it is not a name of a company. This name was invented by me to describe a brand new advertising trend of the 21 century that involves more than just becoming a member of any business network. I have only started to write this article and I am in the process of learning how to write the Wikipedia article properly. This term "Spotonised" has been of a great interest of many PR and media companies in the UK already and I would like to educate people about it by writing some basic formation what it means, what it does, etc. Please, can you reconsider the undulation of my only just started article and let me complete it. Kind regards, Zaneta Vaughan-Spruce -THEWITCHEZ (talk) 22:50, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
- Not done and will not be done per your confession This name was invented by me. Please see WP:MADEUP and our conflict of interest guideline. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:40, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Mobile17
Page was not maintained but there are multiple sources referencing it that could be included, including hard publications. Suggest a restore and update? -140.247.10.201 (talk) 00:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
ie. Mention in Popular Science magazine. http://books.google.com/books?id=m3ZUE6GJZekC&pg=PA78&lpg=PA78&dq=geek+blog+mobile17&source=bl&ots=CZMVzHVAWn&sig=Jg4E_-D_HDm9OdQDqI92AhrUcRk&hl=en&ei=4eAcTqHNNaL00gG-tLG4Bw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CCYQ6AEwAg
- Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobile17, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Ron Ritzman (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Skier Dude (talk) 02:10, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Chris Eskola
I'm not sure why this doesn't meet the standards of being "noteworthy" Chris Eskola is an active bassist who has worked with, most notably, Mike Keneally and Chris Opperman on the album Oppy Music, Vol. I: Purple, Crayon, and Brian Viglione on the album Face of the Sun. -Pivotbass (talk) 01:38, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:23, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Brett Ritchie
Uncontested PROD; I came looking to see if an article was written about this player, drafted by the Dallas Stars, but find it deleted and the deleting admin. referring me here when I objected within the last hour. Want to see the existing article and see if I can determine the concerns and address them, as I am quite familiar with Ritchie's OHL team: the Sarnia Sting. -CycloneGU (talk) 02:17, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Kirk M Kelly
The Reason I wish to have this page undeleted is that if you look here http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2329292/ it shows that Kirk is in fact an actor for film and tv. -Kktalent (talk) 03:12, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Not done While I disagree with the deleting admin that this was an A7 candidate, it was an unsourced BLP. However, you or any other editor is free to write a new sourced article. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:29, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
User:Varuninds
Please restore my last page
The article is a basic information and achievement of the person and the intention is not for advertisement any how... I will make the requirement changes as per the guidelines and help from wikipedia.
Thank you -Varuninds (talk) 05:34, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Not done There's a whole whack of issues here. First, conflict of interest - you cannot write an article about your organization or people within your organization. Second, this business itself does not appear to meet notability requirements, and the person in charge of it certainly does not, and was therefore highly WP:PROMO. There's more...however, even though you wrote this on your userpage, it still must meet certain limits to remain. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:21, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Expired PROD, concern was: Non notable writer with no independent sources to prove notability. -74.113.216.69 (talk) 07:13, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 15:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
File:AcornComunicator.jpg
Source to be confirmed if/when restored. If source impossible to ascertain, image will be replaced with a new upload from one of the links below. Source can be requested from uploader User:TreveX. A free image will be difficult to obtain because this is now a rare piece of hardware. FUR difficult to compose without seeing image - this will be done. -Trevj (talk) 08:22, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Source is likely to be [1] or [2].
- Not done. I'm sympathetic, but even if restored this will end up being deleted on NFCC grounds. This image is simply a picture of the computer and part of the cord sitting on what looks to be a dark brown faux wood grain table. I'd suggest contacting the owner of the first website you linked to and see if he's willing to release his pictures under an acceptable free license. Feel free to follow up on my talk page. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 15:48, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
File:How do you like Wednesday 2.jpg
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in How do you like Wednesday?. -Zundark (talk) 11:38, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Midhurst & Easebourne F.C.
This club have for many years played at Step 6 in the National League System in England - which my majority consensus for English Football clubs makes them notable and worthy of an article - and before its deletion, had been an article for many years. Its deletion makes Midhurst & Easebourne F.C. one of only 4 clubs who play at Step 6 and above in England, not to have their own article. Two others are new to Step 6 this season and the fourth is Rustington F.C. whose article has also been deleted and I'll be appealing that one too. -Madmax2011 (talk) 12:58, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
It is fundamentally wrong to be putting forward for deletion any Step 6 side in the National League System in England as they are clearly notable. In many ways the deletion of this page is an act of vandalism and should be restored forthwith to ensure compatibility with other Step 6 clubs. (Finnish Gas 13:15, 13 July 2011 (UTC))
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.. Please review the original sourcing concerns, or the article may be nominated for deletion at WP:AFD. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 16:44, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Rustington F.C.
Play at Step 6 - as per reason above for Midhurst & Easebourne F.C. -Madmax2011 (talk) 13:00, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
It is fundamentally wrong to be putting forward for deletion any Step 6 side in the National League System in England as they are clearly notable. In many ways the deletion of this page is an act of vandalism and should be restored forthwith to ensure compatibility with other Step 6 clubs. (Finnish Gas 13:15, 13 July 2011 (UTC))
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request.. Please review the original sourcing concerns, or the article may be nominated for deletion at WP:AFD. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 16:44, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Riftforge
no consensus -Krasimir (talk) 13:53, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Note: Wyatt Riot says the reason for deleting it was that the game was not reviewed by third parties. One reason is that it is still in beta.
More importantly, all web games suffer from a mainstream media bias. For example, Rune Scape which has a similar userbase to World of Warcraft still hasn't received a review from [GameSpot] after 10 years of operation. Wikipedia is an ONLINE encyclopedia, so it makes sense for it to provide info on topics which print encyclopedias don't.
Lastly, Wyatt is over-eager to suggest games for deletion as his talk page indicates.
- Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riftforge, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Cirt (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 16:48, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
- also note that for games, as for any article subject, it is necessary to show notability by means of references to significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources; if the game is still in beta, this may not be possible, which means it is not yet ready for an article; and please read WP:NPA and WP:AGF. JohnCD (talk) 16:57, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
NACHO Athletic Club
This is a running association founded 4 years ago in the Boston area that share the principals of the Hash House Harriers, which also have a wikipedia page. This is not for promotion of said club, but since they have been referenced in the Boston Globe, Boston Herald and in media news outlets for their participation in the Boston Marathon and other running activities, I thought it was notable to give them a wikipedia page. -Linzylinz (talk) 16:45, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user Ponyo (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Please also see Wikipedia's guideline for inclusion of articles concerning companies. In general, there need to be multiple non-trivial reliable sources discussing your company for it to be included. --B (talk) 17:18, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Aerodef, LLC
I am trying to create a page for my business, so people can see more information about it. I am not using it as advertising, but it would be great to have it connected to the Facebook profile of the business. I did not put any phone numbers or websites in there. Please do not delete it. People are interested in learning about the biz and this would be a great way to have them learn. I see many businesses on here, and I do not see why this would be deleted if it is just general info about the business. -Aerodef4 (talk) 06:44, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user Acroterion (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:11, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
File:Wwfwcwecwinvasion.jpg
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in WWF Invasion. -Zundark (talk) 16:21, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
- Done. JohnCD (talk) 21:46, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
Soldiers of Allah
reasoning -114.79.18.48 (talk) 21:27, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soldiers of Allah, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Cirt (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 21:44, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
IPE Global
Even after providing verifiable references the page has been deleted. -Preethi31 (talk) 07:39, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
- Not done Verifiability is only a small part of the requirements for inclusion on an encylopedia. There is absolutely nothing in the article that suggests or proves any form of WP:NOTABILITY. The article was promotional in nature, and suggests that it belongs in a business directory and not an encyclopedia. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:51, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
- Note: recreated again anyway: deleted A7 and salted. JohnCD (talk) 22:27, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
Esta Krakower
research -184.77.70.58 (talk) 19:14, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
- Are you asking for the article to be restored permanently or are you just asking for a copy for research purposes? --B (talk) 21:57, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
- This article was PRODed by a sock puppet of an indefinitely blocked editor so I went ahead and restored it. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 14:37, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Salt Spring dollar
I The editor that he was unable to find significant coverage of this local promotional currency in third party sources. Well he didn't look very far. We have been written about in a number of publications including A History of the Canadian Dollar by James Powell, published by the Bank of Canada (2005), and more recently in Local Money: How to Make it Happen in Your Community by Peter North, published by Transition Books (2010) as well we do appear in well known complementary currency online directories such as the one maintained by E.F Schumacher Society at http://www.smallisbeautiful.org/local_currencies/currency_groups.html#canada. Many other communities in Canada have modelled themselves on us, and most anyone in the complementary currency field in Canada should certainly know about us -24.108.188.118 (talk) 23:57, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
- Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user Onthegogo (talk), who proposed it, in case s/he wishes to nominate it at Articles for Deletion. You could improve the article by adding references to show significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. JohnCD (talk) 08:58, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
low dose naltrexone
Good morning from Australia.
Please reinstate the page 'low dose naltrexone'.
Someone keeps changing and/or deleting the page.
Interestingly Steven N blog links keep popping up in this and related topics. Makes me wonder if he or an associate might be promoting Steve and his blog or changing and deleting this entry.
I haven't logged in, but my name is Cris Kerr of Case Health, Australia.
Sorry I haven't logged in. Not hiding, just way too many log-in requirements in this world!
I dearly hope you can help with this because the subject matter is worthy of Wiki and Wiki's time.
In anticipation of a favourable review :-) Cris
Cris Kerr Case Health, Australia Advocate for the value of Patient Testimony free ebook 'Those Who Suffer Much, Know Much' 5th 2010 edition http://www.ldnresearchtrustfiles.co.uk/docs/2010.pdf -220.237.76.147 (talk) 00:08, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
- I repeat the advice given when you (not logged in, but same IP) raised this ten days ago: this page is only for requesting restoration of pages which have been deleted. The article you refer to has not been deleted: what you have is a content dispute about what should go in it. The place to discuss that is the article talk page, where you should try to reach WP:Consensus with other editors. If you cannot reach consensus, use WP:Dispute resolution. See also WP:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. JohnCD (talk) 08:51, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Robert Raburn
Other BART directors past and present have biographical articles on Wikipedia. I somehow neglected to add a link to the BART bio page (which apparently is sufficient): http://bart.gov/about/bod/bodMembersDetail_04.aspx -CodeGeneratR (talk) 01:22, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
- Done. I have reset the BLP PROD timer and you have 10 days to adequately source the article before it will be re-deleted. --B (talk) 17:16, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
The Science of Soulmates
This book and website has a solid following on the net, and has been quoted and used for reference. eg: see http://www.scienceofsoulmates.com/Links for websites referencing. Article originally deleted because of perceived lack of notoriety, which now has been established over the subsequent 4 years. Sorry for the repeat, but the first submission did not record the reasoning. -1.153.248.236 (talk) 03:50, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Science of Soulmates, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Deskana (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. (Everything before this was the template. My personal comments follow.) Honestly, I am certainly open to not considering a five-year-old AFD to be especially binding, HOWEVER, nothing in the list of links you gave seems to be a reliable source. I don't see how this book meets our guidelines for inclusion of articles about books, but if you would like to open a deletion review, you are welcome to do so. --B (talk) 17:09, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
eliane reyes
I have placed the required references -Jmeden7 (talk) 06:11, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. Please see Proposed deletion of biographies of living people for the instructions for responding to a proposed deletion of a biography of a living person. I have removed the prod blp template, but because it was not deleted this is not the right page to ask for this! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:32, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Mark Levy (reporter)
Marc Levy is notable journalist with AP out of Harrisburg, PA. I suspect part of the issue may be that his name was misspelled in the article. Its simple to find his tag line if you include his name along with "Associated Press" in typical web search. his recent article on AP are available here: http://ap-167.newsvine.com/ -98.247.34.65 (talk) 06:15, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
File:David Allan Coe - Underground Album.jpg
- File:David Allan Coe - Underground Album.jpg · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions]
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in Underground Album. -Zundark (talk) 08:05, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
- Done--B (talk) 17:17, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
Gloria Scotti
reasoning -208.120.253.99 (talk) 04:40, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- Not done As an wholly unsourced WP:BLP (imdb does not count) and an article about someone who does not meet the notability requirements for Wikipedia, the article clearly met the specs for speedy deletion. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:13, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Egypt's Got Talents
reasoning -G.S. Soliman (talk) 12:34, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
The page is NOT of a company or an organization or any kind of a profitable activity .. it's a successful reform attempt (evidently celebrated by some news media ) lead by volunteers and the article does not promote for anything.. it's just a hint on the event that aims at discovering and fostering Egyptian talents in all fields. This is not a promoting-business page it a note of reform attempt needed after years of corruption in Egypt.
Please reconsider the deletion of this page.. thank you G.S. Soliman (talk) 12:34, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was found in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Salvio Let's talk about it! 12:39, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
The Poetess
The Poetess is a legit person and veteran rapper and radio personality. This is a viable resource for fans and media to get information on her. -Ogpoetess (talk) 20:31, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. I will notify user Michig (talk), who proposed it, in case he wishes to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion. What the article needs is references to confirm what it says and establish notability. JohnCD (talk) 20:43, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
Team Exile 5
Team Exile 5 is an esports comminity. I dont understand why this page has been proposled for deletion. Please help us understand why the page has been deleted? Sam. -Kung Fu Master (talk) 08:09, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- The article was deleted for "No explanation of the subject's significance". The basic criteria here is that independent writings exist on the topic. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:20, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
IPE Global, again
The article is about a legitimate organization that has been undertaking various projects in the development sector of Health,Education,Rural development ,urban development across the globe, thereby making difference in the development globally.The said organization has also worked with international clients and donors like UNICEF,Asian Development Bank, World Bank in development sector projects to change the existing situation and bring about a difference. -Preethi31 (talk) 09:38, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- Not done - it may be a legitimate and worthy organization, but Wikipedia is not a business listing directory, and IPE Global has not been shown to meet the notability requirement. See also my reply at User talk:JohnCD#IPE Global. JohnCD (talk) 11:20, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
File:International School Peninsula-logo.gif
This image was deleted as unused non-free media, but is now used in International School of the Peninsula. -Zundark (talk) 11:53, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- Done and fur added. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:32, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Ateret Yerushalayim
The page was deleted with the stated reason being "Non-notable Yeshiva program, not clear if it's part of another Yeshiva or independent. Location can't be found in 3rd party sources.".
I have to object to this because Ateret Yerushalayim, otherwise known as AJ, is an independent program, having no affiliations with any other Yeshivas or programs. Furthermore, it is just as 'notable' as several other Yeshivas that have their own Wikipedia pages, such as Eretz HaTzvi, Lev Hatorah, Netiv Aryeh etc.
Furthermore, I'm fairly sure I provided a link to the Yeshiva's (active) websites (http://ajstaff.posterous.com/ ; http://ateret.org/photos/index.php) which should qualify as a 3rd party sources. Ezzi386 (talk) 14:20, 18 July 2011 (UTC) -Ezzi386 (talk) 14:20, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- Question ... how would either of those two websites be considered to be third party, reliable sources when they appear to be directly associated with the subject? I mean, ateret.org is their own website, right? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 14:41, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- A fair point. See the below three 3rd party websites that should qualify as both independent, and reliable: http://www.masaisrael.org/Masa/English/Programs/Yeshivat+Ateret+Yerushalayim.htm http://findayeshiva.org/Yeshiva7_Ateret-Yerushalayim-Jerusalem-Eretz-Yisroel.aspx http://www.yu.edu/cjf/israel_yeshivot/page1.aspx?id=15888 Let me know if anything else is needed to undelete. Ezzi386 (talk) 20:21, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- None of these still meet the definition of reliable source? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:57, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- A fair point. See the below three 3rd party websites that should qualify as both independent, and reliable: http://www.masaisrael.org/Masa/English/Programs/Yeshivat+Ateret+Yerushalayim.htm http://findayeshiva.org/Yeshiva7_Ateret-Yerushalayim-Jerusalem-Eretz-Yisroel.aspx http://www.yu.edu/cjf/israel_yeshivot/page1.aspx?id=15888 Let me know if anything else is needed to undelete. Ezzi386 (talk) 20:21, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Terrance Graven
OTRS permission received from website owner in ticket 2011071710009382 for content at http://terrancegraven.com/bio.html and http://terrancegraven.com/statement.html. -– Adrignola talk 15:10, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Nate Fowler
Nate Fowler is an award winning songwriter. Winning a Gospel Music Association award for song of 2010 for the whole association. He will also be signing a record deal very soon. Along with multiple TV and Film placements for his music. -Natefowlermusic (talk) 19:16, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- Not done IMHO the article was spam and you have a serious conflict of interest. If we are to have an article on the subject it will need to be written by somebody other then you. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:42, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Patrick Henry League
I would like to see what information was originally included in the article. Link to this deleted wikipedia entry found at http://www.encyclo.co.uk/define/Patrick%20Henry%20League. As far as I can tell was originally deleted by a single individual's request uncontested. -66.72.215.225 (talk) 22:55, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
- Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:38, 18 July 2011 (UTC)
Toby Freedman MD
reasoning -Dtjensen (talk) 03:32, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
Toby Freedman is my best friend of 50 years. His wife, Carol, and daughter, Andrea, have provided the material I placed on Wikipedia on Sunday, July 10, 2011 for everyone to enjoy about the life and times of Toby, who was a giant in history. Dale jensen
- Not done The article has not yet been deleted. There is currently a discussion about this article here which is where you should make policy-based arguments. I would be careful to note that as you're close to the subject, WP:COI is a major issue. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:50, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
Institute for Safe Medication Practices
The article was nominated for Speedy Deletion for not saying why the organization was notable, a position I disagree with since the organization has been referenced on a number of Wikipedia pages. It was then deleted before I had a chance to respond. Since the page history and talk page are also gone, do not know how to find out who deleted it so that I could discuss the matter with that person. Please restore it in my user space, so that I can provide more information as requested and then repost it. -Cherlin (talk) 05:08, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- Not done I have looked at the article in question, and it indeed does not suggest any form of notability - and notability is not inherited by being mentioned on Wikipedia. The article also had zero 3rd party reliable sources, and tried to rely on its own website for that purpose. You may contact User:Phantomsteve who deleted it under WP:CSD#A7 for further questions, however, please ensure you have read WP:5P and WP:DELETE before doing so. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:53, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
David S. Rose
The page was a legitimate, fully-sourced, verifiable, biographical page about a notable living person, which had been uncontroversially in place for quite some time. This appears to be a personal vendetta between the subject and person who proposed it for deletion, and I am not aware of any discussion on the article's talk page about the deletion other than the proposer's. I generally monitor pages in this domain area, but hadn't checked this particular one in a while, so I missed the proposal. In addition, checking the current page under the heading "David S. Rose" appears to show that a user account (Barsoom1988) was created for the sole purpose of redirecting the link from the original article, which seems rather suspicious. -Yorker (talk) 05:52, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- (I'm giving the submitter a chance to edit the above and make valid arguments without unproven accusations before actionning this piece of WP:PUFFERY) (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:02, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
Božo Skoko
No reasoning given. -Zrinski hr (talk) 09:37, 19 July 2011 (UTC) I apologize, i didn't read the proposed deletion message. Božo Skoko is a leading croatian professor of public relations & political communication on the University of Zagreb and published many articles and some books on PR in Croatia. I will set two independent sources to his work & biography. Biography: http://medjunarodne-studije-hums.hr/en/who-is-who-i-cis/boo-skoko Books: http://www.novelti.com.hr/en/books/ http://www.matis.hr/eng/vijesti_ostalo.php?id=2044&next=OK&year=2011&today=3&month=1&lang=en http://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak&id_clanak_jezik=35999&lang=en --Zrinski hr (talk) 09:39, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- Question: How do you respond to the references showing he's a research assistant, and not a professor? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:58, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
Jonathan Burgess american embalmer/funeral director
WARNING: you did not submit your request correctly!
You need to replace the "PageName" parameter of the template with the name of the page that you would like restored, spelled correctly, with proper case. Please click the "[edit]" link to the right, and replace the contents of this section with:
{{subst:refund|The name of the requested page|your reasoning for asking to undelete it}}
reasoning -Mississippikid (talk) 11:58, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
The reference for verification is "International Conference of Funeral Servic Examining Board".