Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for page protection

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Scapestessa (talk | contribs) at 11:46, 8 April 2014 (→‎{{la|Banc_De_Binary}}). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


    Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here.

    Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection)

    After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.

    Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

    Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

    Request a specific edit to a protected page
    Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here


    Current requests for increase in protection level

    Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Banc_De_Binary (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    full-protection: Persistent vandalism – users writing material meant to break neutral point of view of article / marketing matierals not related to the brand mentioned by the article. Should be left at: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Banc_De_Binary&oldid=603290097 Scapestessa (talk) 11:15, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Confraternity of Christian Doctrine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – constant vandalism by anon with a dynamic ip. Kathovo talk 09:11, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Bharat Ka Veer Putra – Maharana Pratap (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism. Wikiuser13 (talk | contribs) 08:16, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection: High level of IP vandalism. GnGn (talk) 07:06, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Olivet University (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Indefinite pending changes: I normally wouldn't tag an article for pending changes to begin with, but I think this is a special case. Per this thread, there are a lot of editors to this page who have a conflict of interest and have turned the page into a promotional piece for the university, and rather than blocking users from the page until they have made a set number of edits, I would like it if all edits to the page could be monitored so that we won't have it creep back into a promotional tone. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 05:12, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Total Divas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous vandalism, disruptive edits, addition of poorly sourced/unsourced content. Page was protected for a week but clearly that wasn't good enough to thwart the vandals away. – Recollected 04:57, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Chess.com (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism and bad faith Afd nominations by new acccounts, which invariably turn out to be sock puppets of banned user Wiki brah. Previously protected for three months, sock puppetry has continued. MaxBrowne (talk) 04:25, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    The Authority (professional wrestling) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection: Dubious unsourced additions and vandalism by anon IP editors. STATic message me! 04:08, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Rob Van Dam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection: Dubious unsourced additions by anon IP editors. STATic message me! 03:47, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Semi-protected for a period of 6 months, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Materialscientist (talk) 03:59, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Paige (wrestler) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary pending changes: BLP policy violations – Some additions of unsourced material. Temporary PC protection would be fine for this article. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:48, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Paul Walker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long term vandalism and general disruption. -- LuK3 (Talk) 02:44, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Xbox One (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection: Repeated addition of unsourced content by IPs. --ThomasO1989 (talk) 02:24, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Antonio Cesaro (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Semi-protection: Dubious unsourced additions and general disruption by anon IP editors. STATic message me! 23:22, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Sting (wrestler) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection:The past several days have seen an increase in unsourced edits from IPs and new users.LM2000 (talk) 22:01, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Vance McAllister (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection: Anticipated BLP violations – Very soon, this biography will attract a bunch of new editors because of a breaking story about him caught on video in an affair with an aide.[1][2] The sources are not yet good enough to put this negative information into the article. Careful BLP editors will have to wait until high quality sources discuss the controversy. Binksternet (talk) 20:52, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Alhazen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

    Temporary semi-protection Persistent vandalism by IP hopping editor. Jim1138 (talk) 17:50, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    User(s) blocked. Let me know if they evade. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:58, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    Current requests for reduction in protection level

    Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

    • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
    • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
    • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
    • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

    Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

    Current requests for edits to a protected page

    Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

    • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
    • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
    • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
    • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
    • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

    Fulfilled/denied requests

    A rolling archive of the last seven days of protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Rolling archive.