Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Devleenas (talk | contribs) at 16:19, 10 October 2017 (→Ritam Banerjee: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

    Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
    Shortcuts
    "WP:RFU" redirects here. For requests for unblock, see Category:Requests for unblock. For requests for unprotection, see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection § Current requests for reduction in protection level.

    Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

    This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7, G4, G5 or G11 be undeleted here.

    Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

    Instructions for special cases
    float
    float
    float
    float
    Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

    Deletion discussions
    Articles
    Templates and modules
    Files
    Categories
    Redirects
    Miscellany
    Speedy deletion
    Proposed deletion

    Draft:Abaco Systems

    I, Estebanglas, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Estebanglas (talk) 15:02, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:47, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Boom-A-Rang Diner

    I, Executives Landing, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Executives Landing (talk) 19:33, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:48, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Ch2017/sandbox

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Ch2017 (talk) 20:55, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done. @Ch2017: It was originally deleted as a WP:G12 copyright violation, and we don't restore those. The revision since then isn't a draft article, it's simply a request to modify the ARPA-E article. If you have a conflict of interest, please propose your change on the talk page Talk:ARPA-E. You may preface your proposal with the tag {{request edit}} to cause your request to appear in a category monitored by some users. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:57, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Talk:ECampusOntario

    The corresponding draft is at Draft:Ecampusontario. The talk page should therefore be undeleted and moved to Draft talk:Ecampusontario. —GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 03:38, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

     Done. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:01, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:List of Tin Goyenda series books

    deleted contributions.)}} Arif Khan 07:44, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:12, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    B-Stand Blues

    The page for B-Stand Blues, an Independent Supporters club has been deleted without any valid reason. The supporters club are one of the big fan bases in the Indian Super League and are part of the newly formed Indian National Team supporters club. This page was definitely creating awareness about football in a cricket dominated country. We have had fans across the state join the club after coming across the wikipedia page. Deleting this would deprive us of this opportunity to grow the football culture in a non footballing state. I kindly request you to undelete the page. Thanks —Balaji 3003 (talk) 08:38, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Balaji 3003: It was deleted for not meeting the inclusion criteria in WP:GNG. In particular WP:CORP spells out the inclusion criteria for organizations. Both the nominator and deleting administrator agreed with the reasoning, apparently.
    You don't seem to realize that Wikipedia isn't a publicity platform. It isn't a means for "creating awareness". Deleting it doesn't "deprive us of this opportunity to grow the football culture" because that isn't what Wikipedia is for.
    Because you clearly have a WP:Conflict of interest, your only viable venue for getting an article published is Wikipedia:Articles for creation. Therefore, I have restored the article to Draft:B-Stand Blues. Please work on the article and submit it for review. Do not move it into main space yourself, unless a reviewer accepts it. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:09, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Dunbar Rovers FC NPL

    I, Kerrca, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kerrca (talk) 09:07, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

     Done @Kerrca: There is no such draft. But I have restored Draft:Dunbar Rovers NPL for you. you will have to find independent references to show this is a notable topic. However there are also others. You have a choice out of 2 that you had nothing to do with: Draft:Dunbar Rovers FC or Draft:Dunbar Rovers Football Club. Do you want any of these restored? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:33, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Aggie Zed

    I, Mitzi.humphrey, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mitzi.humphrey 20:43, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

    Mitzi.humphrey 20:43, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

    List_of_job_scheduler_software

    This was a valuable resource that I have used in the past - this information does not exist elsewhere on the web. —203.160.2.134 (talk) 04:00, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. The previous edits from before it was made into a redirect remain in the page's history. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 05:26, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Look at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_job_scheduler_software&oldid=803369794 to see what it was like before redirecting. The suggestion is that inclusion criteria are needed for the list, and references to support the facts. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:47, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Articles for creation/The Curious Incident

    I, Catstring, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Catstring (talk) 08:44, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Shahram Jazayeri

    IThe subjects is notable and I want to improve the article. —Pahlevun (talk) 12:39, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    User:PrakashGparmar/sandbox

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —PrakashGparmar (talk) 14:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC) By mistake linkes added.[reply]

    Not done, account blocked for repeated spamming. Yunshui 雲水 14:54, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Slickdeals

    Slickdeals is a very notable website and has been around since 1999. We have been featured in several national TV show and publications. We can provide a list of very reliable sources. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.254.54.170 (talk) 17:14, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    • Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slickdeals, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user MBisanz (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Furthermore I suggest you review the guidelines on conflicts of interest if you're editing here on behalf of an employer. Hut 8.5 20:37, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Charity_Auctions_Today

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Theplayconnection (talk) 19:39, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Manoj Nair

    The reasoning provided for deletion is not a considered one. The administrator has not applied her/his mind fully and researched on the subject. The administrator even goes on to say that the pic has a copyright issue. Absolutely arbitrary statements. The subject is notable and has launched a global first financial technology company on rentals via credit cards without MDR. A model, which is not prevalent anywhere globally. The administrator may not even have understood the financial global offering. —82.34.111.168 (talk) 19:55, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manoj Nair, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Randykitty (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. —C.Fred (talk) 20:03, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Harlan Hill

    This page was well sourced with articles testifying to Harlan’s notability. It was deleted for political reasons openly admitted by the deleting parties. This is a grosss abuse of Wikipedia. —Patriot154 (talk) 11:43, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done Even if the requester weren't a sockpuppet, this was deleted as a result of an AfD, so any review would have to go through WP:DRV. —C.Fred (talk) 17:31, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Nicholas Lowe

    I, Tim B Haigh, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tim B Haigh (talk) 13:18, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:43, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Chair of Computational Mathematics

    Because future students and colaborators should know about the Chair of Computational Mathematics of the University of Deusto —Hector.olmedo (talk) 13:22, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done. That isn't a valid rationale for restoration. Wikipedia isn't a platform to spread awareness. The organization would need to meet the criteria for inclusion as spelled out in WP:CORP. Also, we do not restore copyright violations, and this article's contents were copied from other sites. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:41, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Reading Eggs

    (This user used the preload form for G13 undeletion, but did not specify the name of the Draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 103.8.168.18 (talk) 21:21, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. The page is a redirect to a section on Archipelago Learning. If you're here because content was removed from that section, take it up on the talk page. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:17, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Bird-Friendly, Solar Organic Glass Design by Sarah Hall.jpg

    I am an OTRS agent. We have received a permission statement about this file: Ticket:2017042010019145. Please undelete the file temporarily so that I can process the ticket. I will let you know if the file needs to be deleted again. Thank you —4nn1l2 (talk) 23:01, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @4nn1l2: I checked the ticket and it looks good. I've restored the file. Please check my tagging. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:46, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alicia Hayes

    I, 70.178.98.186, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 70.178.98.186 (talk) 04:51, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Better Cheddars

    Draft:Tommy Hale

    I, HenryTheHousefly, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. HenryTheHousefly (talk) 09:42, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    I'd like to work on the page —HenryTheHousefly (talk) 09:45, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Archinaut

    I, Gar37bic, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gar37bic (talk) 15:11, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Gar37bic: Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:49, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Nick Brophy, 08-20-2015.tif

    I am an OTRS agent. Permission statement for this file has been received (Ticket:2017041710023039). Please restore the file temporarily so that I can process the ticket. I will let you know if the file needs to be deleted again. Thank you —4nn1l2 (talk) 17:56, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @4nn1l2: please clarify who is the photographer. It looks like a professional shot, unlikely to be a selfie. The photographer owns the copyright, not the subject, unless the subject is the photographer. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:58, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Another version of the file has been re-uploaded as File:Nick Brophy photo wiki-infobox.jpg, in the FFD the uploader claimed to have the rights to the file but not to have taken it. The subject works in the music industry and isn't a professional photographer. I think we might well need to delete the re-uploaded version unless we have evidence the photographer has released the rights. Hut 8.5 21:08, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    (edit conflict) @Anachronist: Thank you. I have not seen the file myself. I just asked to undelete it temporarily so that I can assess and process it. That is why I had written I would let you know if the file needed to be deleted again in my previous post. This is the usual procedure at Wikimedia Commons. Please let me know if the English Wikipedia follows another procedure. 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:19, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @4nn1l2: this is the same file in a different resolution/format. Hut 8.5 14:25, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Georgios Sarafoudis(footballer)

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —213.205.198.93 (talk) 08:41, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done I cannot find a deleted page at the base name or with the "(footballer)" disambiguation. —C.Fred (talk) 14:28, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Mikey Shyne

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Mike.brandt821 (talk) 11:50, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. —C.Fred (talk) 14:24, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Promotion to the 3. Liga

    Requesting userfication of the article (deleted via prod) to User:S.A. Julio/Promotion to the 3. Liga. —S.A. Julio (talk) 18:40, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Adrian Daniel

    I, Annieb7, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Annieb7 (talk) 22:23, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Solidaridad

    Procedural.See the comments by the deleting sysop at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solidaridad.In all probabilities, forgot to restore the article after reverting his close! —Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 08:55, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Kiranraj K

    The article Kiranraj K has enough references. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.

    Wikieditorksd (talk) 09:02, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 13:46, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Blooom

    I, Donlampert, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Donlampert (talk) 16:21, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Andy Carter - 4 time FIA European Top Fuel Dragster Champion

    Danwelberry (talk) 14:07, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:21, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Kristijan Boskovski

    The page is appropriate for inclusion in Wikipedia and,the article was nominated for deletion based on no supporting evidence—Klasyk17 (talk) 17:02, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    As follow the above article on 12th April 2017 had took a place with status of nomination for deletion of the article. The issue occurred as apparently the person was lacking with the notability related to WP:FPL based on whatever reason the previous administrator he has.

    bellow I've managed to find some source linked with his club from Macedonia Rabotnicki Skopje involved with CL tournament something among those lines.

    http://www.champions-league.nl/Spelers/kristijan-boskovski/

    Going back again to WP:FPL I'll remind the fact that Northampton Town is a fully professional team not sure whereabouts they stand at the moment,but surely is one of the league one or league two.England – Premier League, EFL Championship, EFL League One, EFL League Two[37][38][39] are the ones who qualified for WP:FPL. https://www.sport.de/fussball/pe154802/kristijan-boskovski/ http://www.livefutbol.com/equipos/fk-rabotnicki/2005/2/

    Concerning to Nike athlete/ambassador following his and Nike UK twitter the fact is clearly proved to be realible twitter.com>k_boskovski

    http://www.nonleagueyorkshire.com/2017/10/05/sedge-sign-2-forwards-including-wood/.

    So where is coming from the notability of the football clubs,players from the leagues who are Not WP:FPL?


    However this article will go further,just for the fact that the Wikipedia editorial standards have to improve.

    • Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristijan Boskovski, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Patar knight (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. I don't think what you've got here is going to be enough to change anything, the link you provided doesn't say that he played in the Champions League and according to the deleted article while he was signed to Northampton Town he never played any matches for them. Hut 8.5 18:04, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Mike Di Scala

    I am still active as mike di scala an the page it redirects to Ultrabeat I am not apart of that band any more —86.7.241.189 (talk) 00:19, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    • Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Di Scala, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:30, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Chinese enclaves in Silicon Valley

    It seems to be a valid deletion, which doesn't mean the contents are useless, but deleted per wp:deny. Frabkly, I'm not fully sure what our policy is regarding restoration. I have a vague recollection that it be permitted if someone else, i.e. you, take responsibility but I'm not quite sure how that works.--S Philbrick(Talk) 12:57, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hi Sphilbrick - we can restore it if someone else is willing to take responsibility, however if we're not comfortable restoring something created by a sockpuppet we can always email the content or paste a copy of the content in someone's userspace, if we don't want to deny the sockmaster recognition. I know that I've done that on more than one occasion. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:43, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks, that's exactly what I am planning, if they confirm they still want it.--S Philbrick(Talk) 14:06, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Sure I'll take responsibility for this. Btw sorry about the formatting not sure what happened.--Prisencolin (talk) 15:02, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Williams (film)

    Film Fan: Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:44, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    The Marketer (Building)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Marketer_(Building)

    Page was initially created will filler copy that was promotional, but was quickly fixed once the flag was added to the page. The page met Wikipedia standards when it was deleted. —Arachlow (talk) 15:17, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Arachlow: No, it didn't. The most recent revision starts out using unsubstantiated marketing puffery, describing the subject as a "forward thinking" company that's "nestled" in a "historic" area. Start over, in draft space or your sandbox, not in main article space, and submit the article via Wikipedia:Articles for creation. The way you wrote it, it seems like you're being paid to edit here, in which case you must disclose that. See WP:PAID for details. Your account will be blocked if you fail to disclose any paid editing status; after all, you entered into a legal obligation to do so when you created an account here. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:57, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Sustainable Manufacturing

    I, CarloBrondi, request the undeletion of this draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. CarloBrondi (talk) 15:54, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @CarloBrondi: Done – as a draft or Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Drafts and Articles for creation are not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:00, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Ritam Banerjee

    Circumstances have changed, article content has been changed and we have valid citations to provide against all notability claims —Devleenas (talk) 16:19, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=804700554"