Jump to content

User talk:Graeme Bartlett/archive 31

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< User talk:Graeme Bartlett

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 2601:246:c700:19d:b160:b273:e4a3:8b0f (talk) at 06:05, 31 January 2020 (→‎Flusha). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Older talk is in the archives.
Please add new talk at the bottom of the page.

Thank you

Thank you for giving me a valuable idea about the molecule Helium dimer and helium trimer. --Hoa112008 (talk) 05:04, 2 November 2019 (UTC)Hoa112008[reply]

Message

Hola--Kenwongtk (talk) 05:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC) Hiiiii :) --Yansytang (talk) 05:15, 11 September 2019 (UTC) Bonjour--Alexnlk (talk) 05:16, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

EZPZ--AMLSIU (talk) 05:16, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please restore: Gamma Theta Phi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.66.61.218 (talk) 14:58, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please restore: Paxful? It was tagged for speedy deletion as it spotted repost from the one that was flagged back in April 2019. But I've only used a handful of material from the source and it has been thoroughly edited and revised for accuracy and notability. Paxful is a peer to peer bitcoin marketplace operating in almost the same scale as LocalBitcoins. The tone is sufficiently neutral and I've removed the elements from the last edit which made it look like an ad.

User_talk:Bassmanity

Will you revisit it?

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bassmanity (talk • contribs) 09:27, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Category:Aldehydic acids has been nominated for discussion

Category:Aldehydic acids, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Care to differ or discuss with me? The Nth User 01:56, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you look at these matters?

Greetings! I can see you reviewed page made by me—Hay’s bridge. Thank you for your edits.

I’ve made two pages since a long ago and they have not been reviewed yet by any administrator. The pages are Gokuldas Tejpal and Jammu and Kashmir Reservation (amendment) Bill. Can you please review them?

Also, I’ve applied for Rollback before 4 days here and my request got no response which generally get solved within a day or two. Can you please look at this matter? Thanks a lot again. Harshil want to talk? 01:28, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There are some contents under History & Acting Career for Sammo Hung & Sunny Yuen Shun-yi that are identical. Please review and update. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:3D09:1580:B00:582A:36F0:9D82:F921 (talk) 06:54, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Admin's Barnstar
Thanks for reviewing three pages made by me. Harshil want to talk? 01:43, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring a page

Hello sir i would like you to help me restore a deleted page.THANKS Bigboss18 (talk) 03:29, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And what page would that be @Bigboss18:? You have no deleted contributions, and you have not asked at WP:REFUND, the official place for this kind of request. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:32, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sir i edit wiki articles properly but i keep seeing delection tags on my contributions.its not fair.Bigboss18 (talk) 03:36, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well for Kelblizz you will have to say more than just he is a disc jockey, also the two sources look identical, so might be a press release. It would prove notability if you get reliable, independent but different references. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:48, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2-Methyl-1-pentanol

could you fix the errors you introduced in the infobox in 2-Methyl-1-pentanol? you can see them with "show preview". thank you. Frietjes (talk) 17:45, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for noticing and alerting me. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:10, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Thanks a lot for your patience with the churc(h)es typo! Really annoying when a typo multiplies like that through a standard form used. I'll go through the rest and see if there are more. cart-Talk 09:38, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SuperCamp

Can I get that userfied plus talk page? Valoem talk contrib 15:58, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks
Can you also please restore the history of MAXON Computer GmbH, I fix any advertisements and bring the article up to date. It is a notable company. Valoem talk contrib 16:06, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nupe people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FCT (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:48, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of post-election Donald Trump rallies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of post-election Donald Trump rallies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of rallies for the 2016 Donald Trump presidential campaign until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. czar 00:56, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Convert m2

Your AWB script changes m² to <sup>2</sup>. That's good, but it causes errors when done inside a template such as {{convert}}. For example, diff broke {{convert|113.69|km²|2|abbr=on}}. Perhaps some tweaking of the AWB script would change m² to m2 inside a convert template before changing other m² occurrences. Johnuniq (talk) 07:29, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnuniq: Thanks for the alert as I must have missed those in the manual check. Have you fixed the ones I screwed up? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:01, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. I fixed a couple of issues which were shown in a tracking category, all good. Johnuniq (talk) 08:06, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have now tested a regex to fix: {{([Cc])onvert([^}]*)<sup>([23])</sup> → {{$1onvert$2$3 so hopefully I won't have this blunder again. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:37, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I do not use AWB much, but have done some fixes using it. To convert m² I think the proper procedure would be to insert a rule before other rules. The inserted rule would change m² to m2 in convert templates. Then do what you where previously doing regarding other m² occurrences in following rules. Under Advanced settings, the inserted rule would have a name like "fix convert". The Type would be "Inside templates {{...}}", and the If tab would show Contains "[Cc]onvert". The Find tab would be m² and Replace with would be m2. Johnuniq (talk) 07:37, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Purpose of Disambiguous/Redirect Links & Spelling

Check the talk section: 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:American_and_British_English_pronunciation_differences#Purpose_of_Disambiguous%2FRedirect_Links_%26_Spelling

NKM1974 (talk) 17:48, 03 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hello, Graeme Bartlett. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
1233 ( T / C） 05:47, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you review this article?

Greetings! You had previously reviewed few of my pages and thanks for it. Recently, I created the article on the book Partition voices. Can you please review it too? -- Harshil want to talk? 15:18, 9 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you review this article?

Hi, thanks for reviewing articles created by me. I appreciate your efforts. Can you please review this article The Elephant Paradigm? -- Harshil want to talk? 15:47, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your suggestions. I’ll improve this article. However, my one article Men Too movement (India) is still not reviewed. One editor put template of reviewing in process but no action has been taken on it for more than one month. Can you please tell what can be done according to Wikipedia policies?— Harshil want to talk? 13:52, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the template. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:59, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Can it be reviewed by you? — Harshil want to talk? 02:47, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It is too late and no longer open for review. I can d a copyvio check though. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:02, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you review Rakesh Sethi (chef) and Swami Chakrapani? -- Harshil want to talk? 04:04, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here’s another one-Stribodh. Can you review it?— Harshil want to talk? 12:11, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing Request

Hi editor/admin sir wikimedia commons have accepted the OTR's as well and the editors have fixed few mistakes in the page as well. I'm requesting you to kindly review/patrol this page not because i have no patience but because if you google it you will notice many people and news media from pakistan are talking about "operation swift retort" 90% people don't know that there is a wikipedia already made. I hope you will review this if possible i have many different articles.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Swift_Retort_(film)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_Jammu_and_Kashmir_airstrikes (Main Article)

Thanks for reading — Preceding unsigned comment added by پاک آرمی زندہ باد (talk • contribs) 08:32, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@پاک آرمی زندہ باد: 2019 Jammu and Kashmir airstrikes is well past the date for review and is indexed by Google and Bing already. I will take a look at Operation_Swift_Retort_(film). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:45, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That formatting is really messed up, probably to do with mixing right to left and left to right fonts. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:46, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Graeme sir could you try to fix so i can understand and will make no mistake in future regarding 'fonts' Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by پاک آرمی زندہ باد (talk • contribs) 08:52, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It was me that messed up. You font looks OK. But for your page about the film, it is presenting one point of view. Even if the film does so, the Wikipedia article cannot appear to be favouring Pakistan. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:57, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks But actually the fact is mentioned in the page anyways i welcome all the comments :) one question how to check if that page is patrolled ? and thanks for correcting the grammar mistakes. one more thing where i said "indian media propagated" , you added , "indian media said" let me clear it

Indian media on 26 feb 2019 propagated that 350 terrorists were killed next day indian air force and indian army officials said to media that "we are not sure if someone was killed or not and that 350 were killed is a media fabricated story"

so according me it's a propaganda for more pls see https://timesofislamabad.com/26-Feb-2019/pakistan-military-warns-india-of-a-big-surprise https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/03/04/after-pulwama-indian-media-proves-it-is-bjps-propaganda-machine/ https://www.thenews.com.pk/latest/437218-latest-video-rejects-indian-propaganda-of-targeting-jaish-camp


Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by پاک آرمی زندہ باد (talk • contribs) 12:09, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well "propagated" is not the verb for making propaganda. Probably fabricated is a more suitable verb. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:37, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Thank you sir — Preceding unsigned comment added by پاک آرمی زندہ باد (talk • contribs) 14:36, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Hi can you lemme know that what does it mean "article needs to be re written"? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Swift_Retort_(film) the article is edited by editors like you i mean how to re write it ? i am just confused your guidance will be fruitful for me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by پاک آرمی زندہ باد (talk • contribs) 08:58, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Psalm 100

Hi, you didn't seem to understand the complaint about the Psalms. The copyrighted text in question is the Judaica Press English translation. It's listed on the Chabad.org website as a separate copyright from the Chabad website's own copyright. (Can be hard to find, the notice is inside a graphic and not actual HTML text.) I do not claim expertise to know if the Hebrew text is copyrighted. I assume that it is not. But that's immaterial if the English translation is still within copyright, we can't use it. (Claim also affects dozens of other Psalm articles, see my report at Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2019 September 16 where I've listed the numbers of allll the other articles which have infringing text in them. Elizium23 (talk) 06:23, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RE Draft:Jon Green

Draft:Jon Green

Hi Graeme Bartlett, I have more time now to edit and complete this page, It would be much appreciated if you restored it. Thanks! Harrywood2 (talk) 15:41, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rarest element

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rarest element requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 13:45, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you review this article?

Hi! Can you please review this article made by me? Thanks in advance. -- Harshil want to talk? 15:06, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Hottest life" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hottest life. Since you had some involvement with the Hottest life redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:39, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Rarest isotope" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rarest isotope. Since you had some involvement with the Rarest isotope redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:03, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

East Frisia project

Hi. The East Frisia project has been tagged as 'inactive'. Please let us know whether or not you are still interested in working on this area of Wikipedia, by telling us on the talk page. Cheers. Bermicourt (talk) 17:46, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Golden Arm

Can I get that userfied plus talk page? Also the same for TLC Casino Enterprises, Inc. and Hotel Apache. Valoem talk contrib 22:12, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Done @Valoem: you will have to make significant additions to all of these before moving back to mainspace to avoid a redelete. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:37, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I've restored and expanded the articles with additional sources. I've never understood the rule of deleting notable articles that are neutrally written simply because the editor was banned. Do you think it would be safer to remove the edits made by the banned editors? Valoem talk contrib 12:08, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
If you can do that, then do so. The purpose of G5 deletion is to deny recognition to those that break the rules. Some of the trouble makers might be violating copyright, or ignoring paid editor requirements. So if you want to keep any text, please check if it is neutral and correct. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:13, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Selfishways

Hi, just so you are aware, I've blocked six socks involved in selfishways so far ): Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:17, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it would be a good idea to add G5 to delete reason of their work! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:52, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of films created with davinci resolve

The missing films of that 1000 likely didn’t have a reference or article written about them and thus aren’t listed. Therefore, the list will likely never have 1000 films listed. It isn’t ridiculous in size as other video editing programs like Final Cut Pro also have long lists of the software’s use in major feature films. Wikipedia already has a similar list with reliable sources on the Blackmagic Fusion Wikipedia article. However, this new list is relating to DaVinci Resolve rather than simply Blackmagic Fusion’s use in feature films. Also, Blackmagic Fusion has since been integrated into Davinci Resolve like a successor to the program which should explain the overlap in films listed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Googleuser (talk • contribs) 02:18, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC question

Hi Graeme Bartlett - We previously corresponded regarding a restored file for an article that was later moved to Draft:Hily (app). After the draft was reviewed, I posted this question at the AfC help desk, but have not yet received a response. If you're willing to offer any advice, it would be appreciated. Thank you. E-Stylus (talk) 09:53, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merging planetary differentiation and core-mantle differentiation

Hi, I noticed that there are separate articles for planetary differentiation and core-mantle differentiation despite those being essentially the same thing. It seems like the sensible thing would be to merge them, but I have no idea how to do that or request that. Since you are an admin who has made some structural/linkage edits to the core-mantle differentiation page I thought I would ask you. The core-mantle differentiation page is the better of the two, but planetary differentiation is a more general term and that page is listed as a level-5 vital article and linked into more wikiprojects, so it seems like the better option would be to merge the content of core-mantle differentiation into planetary differentiation rather than the other way around, but I'm open to either. AlexInMetal since you wrote the vast majority of the core-mantle differentiation article your input would be valuable too if you are still around. Thanks, Physdragon (talk) 15:57, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will add merge tagging for you. Don't pay any attention to level-5 Vital article classifications as they are the very bottom of importance and not really vital. Planetary differentiation article is poorly referenced and so could do with much improvement. Personally I think they could be two different topics as you say the planetary differentiation is much more general. THat could include planets very different to Earth. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:28, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I've added a section on the talk page to see if anyone else has any thoughts and will leave it about a week before starting to merge them. Physdragon (talk) 15:31, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

About "albumN" in <ref></ref>

Hello,
I have seen this edit, where you replaced <ref name="albumNotes"> by <ref name="albumotes">. I do not know how to configure the AWB tool, but is it possible to avoid replacing albumN → album in <ref></ref>?
Regards --NicoScribe (talk) 21:16, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well I have undid that change. What I can do is not make it change with a capital N inside. I always manually check if the edit is sane. In this case where it was a ref name I thought it was OK as long as it was consistent. But if people care then I don't have to let it happen. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:37, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Revised Draft Sedimentary isostasy

Hello Graeme I have removed sections about Chronosomes and their significance and added a new section about the structural significance of Herschel’s interpretation. This supports my contention that the explanation of the relationship between North Sea stratigraphy & structure and the erosion surfaces on the Scandian Mountains is of considerable current interest. Please discuss any remaining problems that editors foresee before reinstating it to the main Wiki section. Geologician (talk) 16:30, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

UFO (2018 film)

I can get that userfied plus any talk pages? Valoem talk contrib 17:55, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Valoem: It is actually here: Draft:UFO (2018 film), no talk. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:55, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

The correct template is Template:Non-free no reduce. Please be careful to use that one in future – otherwise the bot may come along and ruin the image again... Modernponderer (talk) 13:38, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

thank you

Thank you for your good work!!!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion#John_Mark_Dougan

Moscowdreams (talk) 16:42, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
Thanks for reviewing new articles! Fotaun (talk) 14:35, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Passynski ref and another book

Hi, Graeme! Re the answer at Refdesk re Passynski ref and equation, I've encountered another book Aqueous Solutions of Symple Electrolytes, H. L. Friedman, Felix Franks which would be interesting to check and compare, especially chapter 1 Ionic hydration to see what equations and methods of determination are included. Thanks!--109.166.131.34 (talk) 14:17, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

please email me the deleted article

RE: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion#John_Mark_Dougan Thank you. Moscowdreams (talk) 20:20, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My email is now active. Thank you! Moscowdreams (talk) 07:44, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

LysteriaBot and non-free images

Hi Graeme. A while I back I posted Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 154#ListeriaBot adding non-free images to Wikipedia namespace page, Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 158#Lysteria bot and shadowing and Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 159#Lysteria bot and shadowing to see what could be done about this. I even asked the bot's operator about this at User talk:Magnus Manske/Archive 6#Non-free images being added by Lysteria bot, but never got a response. The bot is at it again, this time adding File:Frank Tashlin.jpg to User:Gamaliel/Billy Ireland. Basically what's happening as explained at User talk:JJMC89#File:Frank Tashlin.jpg is that JJMC89's bot keeps correctly removing the file and LysteriaBot keeps incorrectly re-adding it. Any idea on how to stop LysteriaBot from doing that? -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:41, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

well the bot can be blocked until it is fixed. Wikipedia:BOTISSUE is for talking about misbehaving bots. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:58, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the link. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:32, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Subsidence craters has been nominated for discussion

Category:Subsidence craters, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ikluft (talk) 05:32, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Unknown origin craters has been nominated for discussion

Category:Unknown origin craters, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ikluft (talk) 05:32, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate categories

You created the Category:Electronic cigarette manufacturers. Now there is another very similar category. See Category:Electronic cigarette brands. One of them should be emptied. QuackGuru (talk) 22:35, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think there is room for both, as a company may make several brands. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:01, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed Vuse‎ is owned by R. J. Reynolds Vapor Company. I think Vuse‎ should be merged with R. J. Reynolds Vapor Company. There is no need for two articles on basically the same thing. QuackGuru (talk) 17:37, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Undeletion

Hi. What is the right avenue for an article to be restored that has been deleted on G5 grounds? I have already tried asking the deleting admin but they declined. Solo Samaritan (talk) 07:02, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Solo Samaritan: First you may have to demonstrate that you are not connected to the article creator, and are truly independent. Then the likely trouble that may be connected to the article creator would need to be examined, for example is it a copyright violation, is it an advert, etc. Then you can offer to take responsibility and propose additions. WP:DRV is the place to go to appeal a deletion and establish a consensus. It would often be easier just to write a new article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:39, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Umm, well. Would you Userify or turn 17th Lux Style Awards into a Draft to spare me the hassle of creation or going to DRV. Solo Samaritan (talk) 12:01, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That article was deleted for G5, and you have not yet proved you are unconnected to Pakistanpedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:11, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request

Can you please entertain this edit request?— Vaibhavafro 💬 06:31, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I read it. There looks to be no consensus yet. Indian people will likely see it in the 3rd position too. Being first is a big deal, but other positions make little difference. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:44, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adenodaphne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Involucre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:48, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Substrate presentation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conformation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:30, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mu

Hi, I noticed several edits for "µ → μ" in the context of units. The first "µ" (U+00B5) has Unicode name micro sign, and the later "μ" (U+03BC) has Unicode name greek small letter mu. Given than several of these changes are for units for the micro sign, then why change them to a Greek letter? +mt 20:57, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

hi @Mwtoews: I was started off in this by errors identified on Wikipedia:Typo Team/moss. The WP:MOS recommends the Greek letter for this use. U+00B5 is deprecated. Initially I was confused as those two characters look very similar on the screen, but a find in the browser would not find the alternate, but a Wikipedia search found both, and a wikilink automatically changes it to the Greek letter. Recently I started to use AWB to find micro signs. However perhaps it is not worthwhile to change them when there is nothing else to fix in the page, as the look of the page is the same. There are still 2351 pages with occurrences of "µm" (micrometer) to go! You can expect that the typo team will eventually change them all. I already changed all the "µM". µg and µL are also quite common. Do you think I should stop changing the en-masse? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:39, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, it's a super subtle detail that not many will see. What source says that U+00B5 is deprecated? +mt 22:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dimethyl chlorothiophosphate and Dimethyl phosphorochloridothioate

Hi Graeme. I was just trying to sort out the confusion between these two compounds. I've moved things around in Wikidata, so if you could double check to see if everything looks consistent to you, that would be helpful. -- Ed (Edgar181) 22:03, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Edgar181:, I have already been looking at the Wikidata and it was changing as I looked! I already noticed that chemspider was confused, and it is not clear from the name what the isomer actually is! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:08, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I suspect that though they are technically different isomeric chemical compounds, that in real-world uses it is as a mixture and that any discussion of one in various sources is really about both/either. -- Ed (Edgar181) 22:14, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Piranha Plant restore

No issue with the restore, seems fine to me, but wanted to let you know that the requesting IP is a long time sockmaster, Raymondskie99, who self-admitted such on my talk page when I was asked by someone to check. -- ferret (talk) 01:03, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar for you

The Copyeditor's Barnstar
For reviewing my new pages and adding corrections Akrasia25 (talk) 21:59, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Spiralpuzzle

Hello Graeme Bartlett, In 2018 you were involved in the placement of my first English-language article Dropquote on the Englsh Wikipedia. Now I have translated a Dutch page about a spiral puzzle from here on my Sandbox here. Can you check if the text is translated correct in good English? Feel free to edit, wikify or to improve the text in my Sandbox. I would really appreciate it. With kind regards, Kees Swart (talk) 15:37, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC question

Hi Graeme Bartlett - On 11/25/19, I submitted a revised version of Draft:Landed for AfC review. On 11/27/19, it appears the draft's submission template was removed by another editor. Is it possible to return the draft to the pool of submissions from 11/25/19? Thank you. E-Stylus (talk) 06:06, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Stylus: It was submitted and then reviewed. Once reviewed that pink box appeared. Since you claim to have addressed the problems mentioned, you can click on the blue resubmit button to get another review. If I do it it will say that I submitted it, but that will not be you want. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:11, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your response. The draft submitted 7/29/19 was reviewed. I've restored the second submission template for the revised draft submitted 11/25/19. E-Stylus (talk) 19:43, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"కత్తెర తెగులు" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect కత్తెర తెగులు. Since you had some involvement with the కత్తెర తెగులు redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Plantdrew (talk) 02:15, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Taroona High School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conglomerate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help for conversion of draft into an article

Thank you for refunded my Draft:Vashti(Edwin Long). I want to move the draft into the Main (article) namespace. How can I convert it?--Meenakshi nandhini (talk) 19:27, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Meenakshi nandhini: I have moved it to Vashti (painting) for you. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:09, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you.--Meenakshi nandhini (talk) 19:43, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Licentiate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:34, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Tarrant

Pretty sure that requester is a sock. Look, for example, at Sriolorps (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). This is probably Highstakes00 - in fact the article should probably be a G5. Guy (help!) 00:24, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to block! I myself have no information about the case. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:28, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fryslân

Hi,

I'm not sure where to start, so decided to call upon your help. There is a province in the Netherlands which is wrongly being called "Friesland" for a very long time. I'm trying to edit pages with any reference, stating the official name is "Fryslân", but I have noticed it's literally all over (references to flags, other pages, etc.). Even though the province is called Friesland by many people, the real name is Fryslân. It's like we would make a "Holland" page for the Netherlands. Just because it's common to use a name, doesn't make it right.

For your reference, the official page of the Fryslân government page, which lets you choose Dutch or Frisian as your language. Note that Fryslân doesn't change (!), but everything else in the text does. Why not? Because it's the name of the province. I don't mind footnotes which state is commonly used or mostly referred to as Friesland or even "Friesland in Dutch", but the official links should be correct, right? I always like Wiki to give factual correct information, but don't know how to change the reference pages...

Looking forward to your help and passing on this message :)

A frustrated former Frisian resident — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.115.204.15 (talk) 18:28, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is English Wikipedia, so we use English language names for things, which are not necessarily the local names. And you can also see WP:Official name which expands this. Eventually it may change. However there is not really an "â" symbol in the English alphabet, so don't expect it to be adopted like that. However, if there are any references that fail to match the title of the page, they should be fixed. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:46, 10 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Restore pages and re-redirect?

It's been a few years since I edited here. Something that bothers me is how some redirects are deleted outright (e.g. Volvagia). In my opinion, the page could be re-restored and re-redirect to something more appropriate rather than be outright deleted. Anyway, I see that you're on the Category:Wikipedia administrators willing to provide copies of deleted articles list, and i was wondering if you could either restore Volvagia's edit history or give to me as an XML. I am making a Zelda Wiki, and deleted Wikipedia articles could greatly help (especially if i can copy them and attribute to wikipedia). This way the content is recycled more appropriately :) thanks 2005-Fan (talk) 00:53, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@2005-Fan: I have restored the versions with content to User:2005-Fan/Volvagia. I did not however restore redirects as the target does not even mention this name. Note Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2018_January_28#Levels/stages,_items,_concepts,_and_characters_in_The_Legend_of_Zelda:_Ocarina_of_Time, so I would not call it outright. Are you able to use Special:Export to get your xml? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:07, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I was able to download it, thank you very much. I'll let you know about some other pages when/if i come across them. There's a load of Zelda pages that were deleted -- again this means a lot to me, thanks so much 2005-Fan (talk) 07:32, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
May I have a copy of Kokiri Sword? I want to see what the old Zelda weapon articles looked like (but i cant see it in Wayback Machine). 2005-Fan (talk) 17:53, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The maximum content was:
The Kokiri Sword is a fictional weapon in the video game The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time. It is the basic sword that Link is able to use while a child. It is small but effective. Link finds it in the Forest Training Center near the beginning of the game.
written by User:Misery9944 on 02:14, 24 Jul 2004 (UTC)
Ah, looks pretty short. Thank you for sharing 2005-Fan (talk) 20:42, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

History of video game consoles (ninth generation)

Can you please unlock this page now that the ninth generation as been officially announced. Valoem talk contrib 04:15, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also can I get Chang Gung Medical Foundation this userfied? Valoem talk contrib 05:25, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
OK @Valoem: see User:Valoem/Chang Gung Medical Foundation. It looked like an advert. So try to make it more encyclopedic. I stripped the worst puffery. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:23, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Ninth generation of video game consoles this also needs to be unlocked. Valoem talk contrib 06:28, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I think we should ask the locker Sergecross73 to deprotect it. After all Sergecross73 is still actively editing in this topic area. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:33, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I've sent this back to Draft. It needs discussed by WP:VG before anyone unilaterally moves it, the sourcing is still not there and issues with citogensis related to Wikipedia defining "generations" is a major concern. Please restore salt, I almost did it but did not want to appear to be wheel warring. The page was also renamed in the move to be inconsistent with other generation pages. -- ferret (talk) 12:29, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ferret:, any reason why you want this salted again? I am watching the page and a discussion is opened, also Wikipedia is not "defining" generations the article is based on reliable secondary sources which define the term, did you check the new sources I provided? Valoem talk contrib 13:46, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yangite, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Twinning (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:09, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers

Damon Runyon's short story "Dancing Dan's Christmas" is a fun read if you have the time. Right from the start it extols the virtues of the hot Tom and Jerry

This hot Tom and Jerry is an old-time drink that is once used by one and all in this country to celebrate Christmas with, and in fact it is once so popular that many people think Christmas is invented only to furnish an excuse for hot Tom and Jerry, although of course this is by no means true.

No matter what concoction is your favorite to imbibe during this festive season I would like to toast you with it and to thank you for all your work here at the 'pedia this past year. Best wishes for your 2020 as well GB. MarnetteD|Talk 11:47, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Grandayy

Can I get the full history restored to the Draft:Grandyy it looks like there were previous drafts as well. The YouTuber has 2.5 million views I have also found multiple sources. Also can you move The Magic Castle to Magic Castle per commonname? Valoem talk contrib 18:13, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was wondering if there are any issues with this userfication request. You have helped me restore articles for several years now, all articles I've restored have been brought to encyclopedic quality and I appreciate the help you've given me in expanding Wikipedia. Given my track record with you I can't help but notice that this delay may be caused by this comment by ferret (talk · contribs) who I have never interacted with before. In terms of policy, I am correct here I can restore the page as it has never went through AfD. Also the last version was created in 2016, the version I restore included an additional six sources all of which are secondary and reliable. The VG community is fairly cordial so I believed a discussion can be productive. As it happens the VG community has an IAR policy specifically regarding this article which prefers the release of a next gen console's specs before an article is created. This is to deter fancruft and speculation for entering the article, an issue I believe can be resolved through page protection. Based on policy this version I restored passes GNG and I am confident that if I insisted on an AfD it would survive. However, since there is a general agreement this article will be created after E3 2020 in June, I've elected to wait as that is the most amiable path to take. If you have any issues please let me know, I tend to try and push out as many articles as I can toward the end of the year and I always need to see prior versions of article to make sure I am using stronger sources. I do intent to DRV Grandyy after I've completed the article. Also the second request of moving The Magic Castle to Magic Castle is uncontroversial as per commonname [1]. Valoem talk contrib 19:45, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I've included some sources regarding Grandayy The Verge, Malta Today, Polygon, Times of Malta, and Independent each source gives him significant coverage. Valoem talk contrib 19:53, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I suspect you're conflating separate issues, Graeme may simply be busy at this time, its the holidays after all in many regions. I see you didn't really note that I wasn't the only one opposed to your draft for the ninth generation being mainspaced, as the project discussion clearly shows. We've also interacted on several articles, but that's fine. I have zero opinion on Grandyy. You should focus on that instead. -- ferret (talk) 20:21, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ferret: It would be better if we have this discussion on your talk page, but on the relevant topic, I did indeed note that after the discussion was opened the general consensus is to wait until E3 for specs and to avoid speculation cruft being added to the article, I clearly said that, in fact I somewhat agree. Since there was no AfD nor a comment left on the deletion page, an editor who has not previously dealt with the topic (i.e. me) would be unaware a discussion was requested. Regardless, since no comment was left and no AfD in its history, a discussion is not required to restore an article delete by PROD, plus I added six reliable sources. I do still believe if this went to AfD where a wide range of editor are involved this article would have a chance to survive. The comment you left had an undertone that I was being disruptive when I was not, do you think I was being disruptive? Valoem talk contrib 21:06, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Valoem: The renaming-to-be-moved-later thing struck me as odd, but otherwise there was no undertone intended (nor did I leave a warning, which I would have if I felt it was disruptive) -- ferret (talk) 21:20, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ferret: Ok sounds good, for the move, the reason I do that in some cases is because other similar articles have done the same in the past. It seems earlier generations were written under History of video game consoles (X generation) then moved to X generation of video game consoles such as History of video game consoles (eighth generation), History of video game consoles (seventh generation) I do it to maintain consistence and precedence. Valoem talk contrib 21:32, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That other request actually had nothing to do with this one. I was thinking of referring you to ST47, the deleter. However since I now see an offer to DRV and not just move it back to mainspace, then it will follow the community's wishes in regard to whether this should exist or not. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:45, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I almost always open DRVs for article deletion through AfD. Thanks for the help Graeme, if I was an admin I wouldn't have to always ask you :( Valoem talk contrib 21:06, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
OK I have moved this to Draft:Grandayy - note that I did not use your suggested name (why its redlinked), and I obliterated the preexisting draft with a one-liner. The other draft was this being moved around before. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:01, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks also The Magic Castle to Magic Castle [2] official page shows "the" is lower cased so probably not apart of the name. Valoem talk contrib 21:08, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Now moved. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:11, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Narutolovehinata5

Hello, Graeme Bartlett. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Subduction tectonics of the Philippines.
Message added 01:41, 22 December 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:41, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recovery of the article Nacer E Chahat

I shall rewrite the content in my own words. Thank you for the clarification. I am pretty new to Wikipedia and hence was unaware of the same and got a little confused. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AishaNazia (talk • contribs) 05:17, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Polymers of intrinsic microporosity, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Permeability (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:23, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dr big1232145

Could you please block user:Dr big1232145 ASAP for vandalism. CLCStudent (talk) 21:00, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your work

Thank you for reviewing my new articles in mineralogy. I am very glad to see a good work here, which is somewhat different to what I saw (a misunderstanding, in general) when I first edited/added mineralogy-related papers at least 1 year ago. Cheers! Eudialytos (talk) 13:14, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RfC notice

Based on your interest in this issue, you are invited to comment at Template talk:Missouri TV#RfC on out-of-state stations in state TV templates. Thanks. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 22:14, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mohave Crossing, Arizona

Can I get that userfied plus talk page, I've found sources. Valoem talk contrib 00:06, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And also Greyster, contesting PROD. Valoem talk contrib 03:42, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks one more Victor Goossens contesting PROD. Valoem talk contrib 23:06, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
OK, please add sources! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:09, 29 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I've added sources, can I get Corn (emulator) and Jnes (emulator) userfied plus talk? Valoem talk contrib 04:54, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Jnes (emulator) only ever was a redirect to List of video game emulators#Nintendo Entertainment System so no copyrightable content. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:12, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Corn (emulator) did have some content, but Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corn (emulator) is relevent. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:15, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Can you restore this draft Draft:Professional Dota competition and the talk page, a few editors might be interested in working on this. Valoem talk contrib 19:49, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:16, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year!

Happy New Year!
Graeme Bartlett,
Have a great 2020 and thanks for your continued contributions to Wikipedia.

   – 2020 is a leap year – news article.
   – Background color is Classic Blue (#0F4C81), Pantone's 2020 Color of the year

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2020}} to user talk pages.

– Utopes (talk) 04:40, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Paleogeography of the India-Asia collision system

Hello! Your submission of Paleogeography of the India-Asia collision system at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 14:00, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year & thank you

Dear Graeme, thank you for you helpful edits related to my article creation efforts, not to mention the myriad other things that you are doing for the community. It is lovely to have such an effective colleague. With best wishes for the New Year, --Smokefoot (talk) 02:09, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Microcracks in rock at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 09:21, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for South China Craton

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Paleogeography of the India–Asia collision system

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

David Baden-Powell

Blimey ! That didn't even touch sides ! "Speedy deletion" indeed ! GONE ! Before I even got your note ! Following the very recent death of his uncle Robert, the 3rd Lord Baden-Powell, David's father Michael becomes the 4th Lord B-P, and I thought that some "visitors" might be interested to find out about the new heir to the title, so I created the Page, as a start, while I sought more information, and to enable others to add more. While I can understand the "deletion" bit, I would have thought that "speedy" could wait a week or so ? Would you revive it, please, pro tem ? RobinClay (talk) 11:49, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was surprised it was deleted so quickly too. How I put it into a draft? If the guy actually has the title I would say that was a claim of importance, but heir is too indirect. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:52, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Is that a "Wiki-rule", or just your opinion? The new Baron is 79, so it may not be too long before... and with a change of title, people are likely to be interested in the new heir. That's my opinion <grin> RobinClay (talk) 17:44, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Microcracks in rock

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not the woodlouse

I don't know what is it an insect or something else I am just curious about knowing what this creature called. It was about about 2½ inch in length and about ¾ inch wide in width. And I don't thinks it is woodlouse its not that much curvy it's so much flatter than that. Here is another image of this creature.

  • image 2
    image 2

Sandeshkumar M. 11:15, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi Graeme, Please excuse me for interrupting, I noticed this image was on your talk page while I was attempting to identify it. I am pretty sure it is the larva of a firefly/glow-worm of the family Lampyridae. The exact species I think would require more than this image. I thought you might be interested. Regards. Richard Avery (talk) 15:59, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No problems. I was sticking to WP:RD/S for this topic. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:59, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Biogeography of paravian dinosaurs

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

it seems

very unfashionable these days to add fully completed talk page tags, so its tedious to follow and try to fix, but them the breaks, and happy new year anyways.... JarrahTree 23:28, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy new year @JarrahTree: do you think it is better if I don't add tags for the WP Australia? I notice that the parameters have been added to by you and others recently. But I know very little about them. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:36, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
replied by email... JarrahTree 23:52, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No big deal, the tagging of anything at any level is always very valuable for the project, I just was concerned that my editing might have bothered you.. explained off wiki, cheers JarrahTree 00:03, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Superior Craton

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Heat-pipe tectonics

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 11 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Junggar Basin

--valereee (talk) 12:02, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dibenzylaniline

The {{under construction}} template is useful when you've got "more to follow in an hour" and might deter the kind of drive-by tagger who doesn't look at edit summmaries! Or just stick a reference, any reference, in before you hit "publish"? PamD 17:29, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Western Block of the North China Craton

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day!

Have a very happy first edit anniversary!

From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 05:57, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Eastern Block of the North China Craton

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of File:3Coffins.jpg

Hi. I see you've deleted File:3Coffins.jpg as an as an allegedly invalid fair-use claim. It was no doubt bot-tagged because a fair use image showing the UK first edition already appears in the article, and the bot thought that this was a second image showing the same thing. But this picture actually shows the historically-significant US first edition, which is quite different and even has a different title. In response to the bot tag, and as it requested, I explained the rationale on the image's talk page. Did you see that? Regards MichaelMaggs (talk) 10:42, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, this was over 10 years ago. I will take a look. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:35, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The picture is the same as what appears on https://www.amazon.com/Three-Coffins-Number-Mystery-Library/dp/B001T8CWJE . It was not tagged by a bot, but user:Salavat. The reason Salavat gave wsa "Fails WP:NFCC#3a as multiple non-free images are being used when one would suffice, and also, or in the alternative, fails WP:NFCC#8 as the image does not add significantly to readers' understanding of the article and its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding". I can't see that you User:MichaelMaggs ever edited the file information or talk page. Perhaps you are thinking of another file? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:43, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OK now I see you were editing File:The Three Coffins, US first edition 1935.png only a few days ago. you should talk to user talk:Explicit about this delete. User:JJMC89 did the tagging for F7 delete. (not a bot) JJMC89 is also an admin. (a bot did do a request to remove old unused revision though). Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:50, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, I seem to have confused two separate uploads. I'll contact user talk:Explicit as you suggest. Thanks for the quick response, and apologies for bothering you. MichaelMaggs (talk) 13:53, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you
Thank you for your help Bogdan Uleia (talk) 12:19, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jennifer Wilcox, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oak Hill High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:30, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

chembox

Thanks for putting the chembox on the Color Developing Agent articles. I added them so that I could link them from the appropriate articles, and realizing that even the simplest part of the chemistry wasn't in the other articles. I actually did E6 processing when I was in college 40 years ago, and I remember looking up the names on the box, especially the color developer which is, pretty much, the most important part. I didn't know about chembox, but it is nice to see them. Thanks! Gah4 (talk) 10:42, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2020 Island Express Sikorsky S-76B crash

Please unprotect this so established editors can edit it fully protection appears to violate WP:AGF. This redirect has been contested and is time sensitive as this is an ongoing event and likely to be expanded now. Valoem talk contrib 22:31, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Either ask user talk:Zzyzx11 or put a request at WP:RFPP as this is obviously controversial, so I won't do a unilateral override. (Related discussion is there already) In the meantime you can edit Death of Kobe Bryant. Or use Talk:2020 Island Express Sikorsky S-76B crash to discuss whether or not it should be a redirect. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:38, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Zz appears to have left after full protection as he is not responding. There was no policy violating edit warring so the full protection is unnecessary and bold. Unfortunately, this is time sensitive as current and trending article are most likely to be expanded. I've left a message on Mjroots talk page regarding this. Valoem talk contrib 22:45, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Edit warring is policy-violating by definition. Plus you don’t boldly move forward while a discussion is ongoing and you have been reverted. — MarkH21talk 22:52, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I see a response from Zz about 20 minutes ago. There was a small amount of reverting. But the next step is WP:RFPP. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:55, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Flusha

Can you restore the full talk and history and can you restore the history and talk for Cheating in Counter-Strike plan on taking an relevant information and moving it to an article on the Culture of Counter-Strike. Valoem talk contrib 06:52, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

? are you asking for history of Flusha? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:05, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Can you also restore the history and talk of XNXX, DRV closer Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs) requested I ask another admin. Valoem talk contrib 17:09, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OK see Draft:XNXX. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:11, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for undeletion

I just placed a Request for undeletion request for an old article at the usual site, and given that I am a non-logging editor, am afraid it will get a knee-jerk rejection. You have seen some of my editing, and know that I am reliable—could you take a quick look at that request, as time permits? Thanks, cheers. [Frmr. Prof.] 2601:246:C700:19D:B160:B273:E4A3:8B0F (talk) 06:05, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Graeme_Bartlett/archive_31&oldid=938442520"