User talk:Mojo Hand/Archive 2008
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Mojo Hand. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 2005 | Archive 2006 | Archive 2007 | Archive 2008 | Archive 2009 | Archive 2010 | → | Archive 2015 |
Thank U Kabigula & Nishkid64
to hide the page.... See, I had collected some 10 Hindi newspapers on Naresh Sonee from India , states like Rajasthan, (Udaipur, Jaipur) , Punjab state etc. Any Indian can't deny the popularity of these newspapers. All Indian working on wiki project if live in India or such states are certainly aware of these few newspapers who had covered news/reviews on Sonee in India. I will make a separate url and post on it all such news/reviews in form of scanned images – eg: photograph of Hindi news papers. Your goodself can stroll and verify them when ever time permit you. If your good self still insist I will email the url to the head administrator of wikipedia (investigation authority if such are there objection here ) also for their final verdict regarding notability or reliable sourced issue in question. But , meanwhile I only request you & Nishkid64 to help or source me out in getting translating these hindi news in English. & just allow me to recreate /post few line on Sonee with this link of url carrying newspapers in Hindi about Sonee. Any interested editors helping wiki project can translate the same in English and may help the page to grow by pace . But you see let me reintroduce my page on Sonee & Brhmaand Pujan.I beg you both to join me. No selfless goal of positive philanthropy is impossible if brilliant well wishers like you enhance wikipedia to beautify the world by also helping good words of wisdom to get spread or circulate on it. The best way out is - Prior of re creating the page I will post sample of my writings of the page in question on my talk page & invite you both for your check that would make me more appropriate when both of you will edit/ improve/beautify my small essay para on Sonee. I will not go on any details as I did in past. This essay will only show notability details of newspapers of Hindi. Only all which was published on various newspapers of India. Help me out pls. Regards- Alan Sun- --Dralansun (talk) 15:18, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Sorry I forgot to wish U - Happy New Year--Dralansun (talk) 15:29, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
A request for your consideration regarding CAT:AOTR
| Hello fellow Wikipedia administrators open to recall category member! |
|---|
|
I am leaving you this message because recent events have given me concern. When Aaron Brenneman and I, and others, first developed this category well over a year ago, we visualized it as a simple idea. A low hassle, low bureaucracy process. We also visualized it as a process that people would come to trust, in fact as a way of increasing trust in those admins who chose to subscribe to the notion of recall. The very informal approach to who is qualified to recall, what happens during it, and the process in general were all part of that approach. But recent events have suggested that this low structure approach may not be entirely effective. More than one of the recent recalls we have seen have been marred by controversy around what was going to happen, and when. Worse, they were marred by some folk having the perception, rightly or wrongly, that the admin being recalled was trying to change the rules, avoid the process, or in other ways somehow go back on their word. This is bad. It's bad for you the admin, bad for the trust in the process, and bad for the community as a whole. I think a way to address this issue is to increase the predictability of the process in advance. I have tried to do that for myself. In my User:Lar/Accountability page, I have given pretty concrete definitions of the criteria for recall, and of the choices I can make, and of the process for the petition, and of the process for other choices I might make (the modified RfC or the RfAr). I think it would be very helpful if other admins who have voluntarily made themselves subject to recall went to similar detail. It is not necessary to adopt the exact same conditions, steps, criteria, etc. It's just helpful to have SOME. Those are mine, fashion yours as you see fit, I would not be so presumptuous as to say mine are right for you. In fact I urge you not to just adopt mine, as I do change them from time to time without notice, but instead develop your own. You are very welcome to start with mine if you so wish, though. But do something. If you have not already, I urge you to make your process more concrete, now, while there is no pressure and you can think clearly about what you want. Do it now rather than later, during a recall when folk may not react well to perceived changes in process or commitment. Further, I suggest that after you document your process, that you give a reference to it for the benefit of other admins who may want to see what others have done. List it in this table as a resource for the benefit of all. If you use someone else's by reference rather than copy, I suggest you might want to do as Cacharoth did, and give a link to a specific version. Do you have to do these things? Not at all. These are suggestions from me, and me alone, and are entirely up to you to embrace or ignore. I just think that doing this now, thinking now, documenting now, will save you trouble later, if you should for whatever reason happen to be recalled. I apologise if this message seems impersonal, but with over 130 members in the category, leaving a personal message for each of you might not have been feasible, and I feel this is important enough to violate social norms a bit. I hope that's OK. Thanks for your time and consideration, and best wishes. Larry Pieniazek NOTE: You are receiving this message because you are listed in the Wikipedia administrators open to recall category. This is a voluntary category, and you should not be in it if you do not want to be. If you did not list yourself, you may want to review the change records to determine who added you, and ask them why they added you. |
...My guinea pigs and the "A"s through "H"s having felt this message was OK to go forward with (or at least not complained bitterly to me about it :) ), today it's the turn of the "I"s, "J"s, and "K"s! I'm hoping that more of you chaps/chapettes will point to their own criteria instead of mine :)... it's flattering but a bit scary! :) Also, you may want to check back to the table periodically, someone later than you in the alphabet may have come up with a nifty new idea. ++Lar: t/c 20:24, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your support in my RfA. It was definitely a dramatic debate, that landed on WP:100! I paid close attention to everything that was said, and, where possible, I will try to incorporate the (constructive) criticism towards being a better administrator. I'm taking things slowly for now, partially because of the holiday season and all the off-wiki distractions. :) I'm also working my way through the Wikipedia:New admin school and double-checking the relevant policies, and will gradually phase into the use of the new tools. My main goals are to help out with various backlogs, but I also fully intend to keep on writing articles, as there are several more that I definitely want to get to WP:FA status! Thanks again, and have a great new year, --Elonka 07:27, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Czechs
Regarding the IP user 71.99.132.37 on this page, I have warned them multiple times, sent warnings and he/she continues to vandalize the page, any suggestions?--The Dominator (talk) 00:26, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- The vandalism is continuing on Czechs, could you please semi-protect it?--The Dominator (talk) 01:12, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- This is turning into a serious problem for me, the IP starting 71.99 has started to turn on me personally and has began to randomly undo my edits on other articles, see this: Prague Spring. I think it would be best to block the IP since it has became a real nuisance to me.--The Dominator (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for the unblock, sincerely --The Dominator (talk) 06:42, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- This is turning into a serious problem for me, the IP starting 71.99 has started to turn on me personally and has began to randomly undo my edits on other articles, see this: Prague Spring. I think it would be best to block the IP since it has became a real nuisance to me.--The Dominator (talk) 04:01, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for stepping in and unblocking in the light of the wider picture, as I had unfortunately gone offline. --Stephen 07:02, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Re: Unblock
Many thanks.... :S - NeutralHomer T:C 17:32, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Uh Oh
Am I in trouble?--User:Angel David (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) 02:27, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Not at all. You were bold, and that's usually encouraged. In this case the consensus seems to be against your change, but no-one is suggesting you did anything wrong.--Kubigula (talk) 02:37, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Okay. As long I don't get block--User:Angel David (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) 21:27, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Headless Nun deletion
This deletion is discussed at Wikipedia:Help desk#i need help and Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion#Speed of speedies. Why did you delete it and will you undelete and possibly tag for sources/notability instead? The story appears old with many Google hits. PrimeHunter (talk) 04:31, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- I have userfied the article and tried to explain the situation to the new user. I do not think that this should have been deleted as aptent nonsense as it was perfectly understandable, and patent nonsense should be limited to articles that make no sense whatsoever. 04:41, 13 January 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dsmdgold (talk • contribs)
Let me say I wasn't trying to single you out here. My opinion is that this deletion was in line with common practice, and not an exceptional case in any way. I don't want to discourage admins like you who work on clearing the CSD categories, since your work there is important and valuable. I think it is possible to change the CSD system somewhat so that you can still work efficiently, while authors have more chance to bring new articles up to an acceptable standard. — Carl (CBM · talk) 14:50, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm sorry about that. I didn't think people would interpret my comment in the way they did. I noticed the deletion when the article creator asked about it on the help desk. — Carl (CBM · talk) 02:06, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- W.marsh says exactly what I was thinking: "Everyone's actions in the situations you describe are defensible - the new users didn't know better, the taggers and admins were just trying to patrol newpages as it is necessary for us to do." Next time I'll point that out explicitly from the beginning. — Carl (CBM · talk) 02:32, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Rudget!
Kubigula this is me
I have already added you in my project team I am seeking help from some Wiki-Indian-Project- Hindi Editors to translate all news-reviews on Brhmaand Pujan & Naresh Sonee from my created site- http://brhmaandpujan-news-reviews.tripod.com/ . Your good self can also visit this link & please kindly help me out to open Naresh Sonee ‘s page with your lucky hands. Write two line on him please. I think I deserve your help & also kindly help me if some more Hindi translators comes forward to help the page grow. You should remain with my page for ever . God Bless U. --Dralansun (talk) 17:11, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Image:CZA8754_Alstom_?M_Czamanske.jpg
Why was this image deleted so fast (in about 10 minutes) when i have all permissions from ALSTOM and didn't have a chance to correct copyright licenses Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 06:07, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Dear Kubigula
- Im still confused, got this and is probably an automatic boot:
- Thank you for uploading Image:CZA8756 Alstom ?M Czamanske.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
- If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:09, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Moebiusuibeom-en"
- Image used in: Santo Domingo Metro, Since in the ALSTOM website diden't have the HR images for downloading i was looking for, I have personally e-mailed ALSTOM and explained what i needed and what the images where going to be used for and they provided me with several High Res and explained exactly how to use them, I've placed all "copyright status" and info on the dowloaded image, what else do i have to do?? PLEASE HELP – Kindly Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 17:33, 19 January 2008 (UTC)
- Re: Licensing advice
- Hey Kubigula, tanks for the advise, I've e-mailed ALSTOM and unfortunately my contact is out on holidays or office, got an automatic message:
- Ich werde ab 14.01.2008 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am 21.02.2008.
- Ich werde Ihre Nachrichten nach meiner Rückkehr beantworten.
- I will be out of the office from 14.01.08- 21.02.08 inclusive. I will reply to your messages once I return to the office.
- I do still have the original e-mail they've sent with images and rules on agreement about copyrights and of mentioning photographer! Nevertheless, as you say, much better if i get done formally!
- In the mean time i will be fixing my "image description pages", i consider myself a pretty good "wihkieditor" but my image description pages are truly horrible, never paid much attention till now! cheers, Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 03:11, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Debt Buyers
Dear, Kubigula
You're articles have been a great help to me, I appreciate it.
I am analyzing the debt buying industry and have a question that needs solving. The debt buying industry is one of the most profitable I have ever come across. On average profit margins have been north of 30% for the past 5 years for the premier players such as Asta Funding. In the long run, competition theoretically should eliminate such large profits back to a normal level. However, this has not happened.
This is surprising considering the fact that very little cash is needed to start a new debt buying business. The existing companies point to the fact that their experience and in house software programs give them the edge in what a ‘good’ price to buy the debt for. However, there are a number of companies who have a history of dealing with consumer debt and are in a good position to enter this highly profitable business. For example, Asta funding outsources 95% of the actual debt to collection to third party companies. These third party companies are well situated to talk to the debt originators and ‘cut out the middle man’ (in this case Asta). Yet, this has not occurred to meaningful extent.
My question I hope you can help me with is why? Why have their not been a large number of new entrants? Are their large regulatory reasons? Is past direct experience really that important? I am out of ideas, any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
Keep in touch,
Trevor Scott
please contact me at trevor.c.scott@gmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.184.153.237 (talk) 05:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Why did you delete my page (Longkon)?
Dear Kubigula,
I understand that wikipedia needs to delete pages that are not up to scatch, so as you deleted mine, I would like to ask you to help me create a new one, that can be an accurate summary of the website "www.longkon.com".
I am asking this as I am trying to create a decent page, and I am not very good. Thank you very much in advance,
Ningnangnong (talk) 16:45, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks, Ningnangnong (talk) 08:06, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
Wrongful delete
How embarrassing! I must have bumped the back button. Thank you so much for letting me know, haha. нмŵוτнτ 03:22, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
TfD for Template:uw-tblock
Hi NHRHS. Though I supported deletion of this template, I appreciate that you were thinking of creative ways to make admin chores easier - it wasn't a bad idea in theory.--Kubigula (talk) 21:41, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- Not a problem, I also supported deletion as "Just delete it, per above". Thanks for stopping by my talk page. NHRHS2010 21:48, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Czechs, he's back!!!
[1], thought you'd like to know, it's OK, I've got it.--The Dominator (talk) 01:31, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
- Can I get some help, please? It seems that he's at it again.--The Dominator (talk) 03:23, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- I'm really sorry to be constantly bothering you with this, but it's difficult to me as it will appear as a content dispute to anyone not involved. Trust me, I would much rather be contributing to this encyclopedia than dealing with crap like this. Anyway, thanks for all your help with this guy.--The Dominator (talk) 04:10, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- OK, once again thanks for all your help with this, I have also posted a message on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Czech Republic as some of the sockpuppets have come into contact with some of our members and it's a fairly notable thing within the project. So thanks for all your help! (hopefully I won't be needing it too much in the future =)--The Dominator (talk) 05:12, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Bad news, seems that he has a different IP: 71.122.222.102 any suggestions?--The Dominator (talk) 21:35, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Hmmm. I'll keep an eye on it - could also be a copycat.--Kubigula (talk) 21:42, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- So you think there's any possibility of bringing it up at Administrator's noiceboard and getting a range-block for a good period of time? I find it very annoying to have to look at all the pages I edit and make sure he hasn't undone them, I want to fix up articles and help Wikipedia, not deal with people like him.--The Dominator (talk) 04:42, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- That would be fine, what about the 71.122 one?--The Dominator (talk) 05:01, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- So you think there's any possibility of bringing it up at Administrator's noiceboard and getting a range-block for a good period of time? I find it very annoying to have to look at all the pages I edit and make sure he hasn't undone them, I want to fix up articles and help Wikipedia, not deal with people like him.--The Dominator (talk) 04:42, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- Hmmm. I'll keep an eye on it - could also be a copycat.--Kubigula (talk) 21:42, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Bad news, seems that he has a different IP: 71.122.222.102 any suggestions?--The Dominator (talk) 21:35, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- OK, once again thanks for all your help with this, I have also posted a message on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Czech Republic as some of the sockpuppets have come into contact with some of our members and it's a fairly notable thing within the project. So thanks for all your help! (hopefully I won't be needing it too much in the future =)--The Dominator (talk) 05:12, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- I'm really sorry to be constantly bothering you with this, but it's difficult to me as it will appear as a content dispute to anyone not involved. Trust me, I would much rather be contributing to this encyclopedia than dealing with crap like this. Anyway, thanks for all your help with this guy.--The Dominator (talk) 04:10, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
71.99.98.107, you think you could help me out?--The Dominator (talk) 06:06, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- I have decided to take it to administrator's noticeboard for more opinions:Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#IP 71.99..., your input on the matter would be appreciated, note that I was declined a block for him again which is why I took it there again.The Dominator (talk) 15:02, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yup, a real cameo appearance, I was thinking of taking some further action, is it possible to report the abuse to their ISP?--The Dominator (talk) 19:18, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- You are right, but most administrators that I ask to handle the issue are not familiar with the incident and to them it seems good faith, therefore I have to explain the situation all over again to every new admin I ask for help, so what exactly should I do if you're not online?The Dominator (talk) 00:43, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yup, a real cameo appearance, I was thinking of taking some further action, is it possible to report the abuse to their ISP?--The Dominator (talk) 19:18, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Ranson
I think we are probably talking about two different people, but I dod not know and I am curious. Thomas "R" from Augusta County it is said was involved with the tombstone for Stonewall Jackson's mother, Julia Neale Jackson in Ansted, West Virginia. Thomas Davis Ranson was an attorney in Staunton, VA for the Tidewater Railway when it was formed in 1904. I have found some mention of Thomas Davis Ranson at the Library of Virginia online, he apparently was a judge at some point. I am also very interested in anything you might run across about William Nelson Page or Emma Gilham Page each of whom had relatives in Augusta-Staunton-Rockbridge. Emma's dad was William Gilham of Civil War and William Page was co-founder of the Virginian Railway (and its' precedecessor Tidewater and Deepwater Railways). Glad to share and hope you do same with any info on these.
BTW, we have been fighting an ill-concieved suggestion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bad Newz Kennels dog fighting investigation if you want to chime in. Thanks, let's stay in touch. Mark in Historic Triangle of Virginia (talk) 18:40, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
George Cooke (painter) DYK
|
On 10 February, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article George Cooke (painter), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--BorgQueen (talk) 23:42, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
Token of Gratitude
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| I award you this barnstar for being patient and helpful during this long episode, thank you very, very much The Dominator (talk) 05:48, 11 February 2008 (UTC) |
Thanks for the revert on my talk page. I see you have blocked him indefinitely - good call. Kind regards, nancy (talk) 13:46, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
 |
Thank you for participating in my RfA! It was closed as successful with 74 supporting, 3 opposing, and 1 neutral. I will do my best to live up to the trust that you have placed in me. —Remember the dot (talk) 18:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC) |
Sillygostly
It's not vandalism? What would you consider someone who constantly deletes the articles even being told he has to post a Quick Deletion tag to even get a consensus? Check my talk and the SPore talk page - he talks a lot of shit towards me. He refuses to concede on any point, ever, and he acts like the Administrator he isn't. He doesn't like being called a kid? What do you want me to call a 16 year old who claims to be a crossdressing sunken chest Muslim Australian? JAF1970 (talk) 04:39, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
- I wasn't deleting anything. The Spore DS/Mobile articles were merged with the main Spore article. Sillygostly (talk) 05:00, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Spore
JAF1970 continues to revert my edits, and refuses to reach a compromise or a consensus with me. My only argument is that the DS and Mobile versions of Spore are simply not notable enough to justify separating them into their own articles, and given that the DS/Mobile articles consist of nothing more than copy/pasted information from the Spore (video game) article, I believe a merge is in order. The norm with video game articles relating to games that are released concurrently under the same title are contained within a single article. For instance, another game released under a *slightly* different title by EA was Need For Speed: Most Wanted (the PSP verison was released as "Need For Speed: Most Wanted 5-1-0"), however PSP-specific information was confined to the main NFS:MW article, and I believe Spore should follow suit. Sillygostly (talk) 06:00, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Doczilla's RfA
 "The bad news is time flies. The good news is you're the pilot." - Michael Althsuler
|
Block template
Hey. I know I have never had any interaction with you, and hate to bother you, especially with a question that makes me sound so newb and where the answer is probably simple, but I have a question for you. For two days now, I seen you handle AIV, and being a newly appointed administrator I blocked a user yesterday. However, after doing so and issuing the the uw-block1 template, I was unable to sign it within the box. By putting it within the template, it breaks it, by signing it outside the template it is no longer in the box, and by simply leaving the template it does insert my signature. Again, sorry to sound so dumb, but any assistance would be helpful. Thanks, SorryGuy Talk 23:34, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Bodypump Entry
The article is not advertsing so I removed the header. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pipera (talk • contribs) 14:02, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BodyPump
We have been throught this since 2006 please read the history of the article before saying this or making any other comment regarding the adding of that header as they should have before adding that header. This situation was cleared up way back then and I would consider it pointless to call it spam when clearly ages ago it was declared not spam.
Bodypump Entry
We have been down this path a number of times since 2006 when the initial article was placed here at wikipedia. I am aware of the debate regarding the article at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BodyPump
I don't consider the article advertising as much as I removed the tag. There is an right also to remove the tag as well. Over periods of time people have commented that this is advertising. Lets consider half of the content here is so called advertising from articles on Sony and American idol are also advertising and would consider that the placement of the tag is a mute point and should have not be considered in the first place.
I encourage debate but when rights of modifying an article and removing a tag that has no formal basis is also a mute point. As surely you can consider academically.
Comments?
IMO! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pipera (talk • contribs) 06:19, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Flat Top Manor
Don't know if this was a mistake or if it matters, but Flat Top Manor is in North Carolina. You put a tag in discussion that it is in Virginia. --Doug talk 15:28, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
- Yup! Does that mean then two wrongs makes a right?--Doug talk 15:43, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
I completely recently rewrote Southern Highland Craft Guild but I am not sure if it is a five fold improvement from the last previous edit of 15 December 2007
to be nominated for a DYK, where it needed a major rewite which I did . --Doug talk 22:53, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Besides Moses Cone Manor these are other articles I have written in the last few days that I have self nominated for DYK:
- Moses H. Cone and Moses H. Cone Memorial Park and Folk Art Center and Julian Price Memorial Park and Flat Top Manor and Julian Price.
- Folk Art Center was selected as a DYK yesterday and Flat Top Manor + Moses H. Cone + Moses H. Cone Memorial Park were selected today
as a "3 in 1 hook" DYK. I self nominated Julian Price today for a DYK, so we will see what happens. If you see any improvements that can be made
on the article itself or on the DYK hook for Articles created/expanded on March 4, please let me know.--Doug talk 15:25, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Quick question regarding an AfD
You closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norman Beaker as a keep and yet the count was 9 to Delete and only 5 to keep??? And that would be 10 to delete if you count the nominator. How does an clear 'delete' wind up as a 'keep'? Thanks 142.167.92.127 (talk) 02:33, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- Hi, and thanks for the question - I'm happy to explain my reasoning. The raw "vote" count was actually 8 deletes to 6 keeps, even including the nominator (he "voted" in addition to nominating). One of the deletes, Ghmyrtle, actually switched to keep, though he didn't strike through the original delete comment so it's easy to miss.
- More importantly, AfD is a discussion rather than a straightforward vote, so the quality of the arguments is key in a case where the raw count is close. In this case, three of the delete comments occured prior to the sourcing and rewrite by User:Cricket02. Two of those did not comment after the rewrite, so I discounted their initial comments somewhat, as they had commented on a different version of the article. The only one of those three who did comment after the rewrite was User:Enigmaman (the nom), who conceded that the article was "arguably up to standards" after the rewrite. Four delete comments came in after the rewrite, but, of those, two had virtually no content and one switched to keep.
- So, the only substantive arguments for deletion, after the rewrite, came from Enigmaman, and he seemed on the fence, and from Richhoncho. In contrast, just about all the keep arguments were substantive and offered reasoning beyond simply linking to a policy. So, my analysis was that the keep side had the stronger arguments and carried the consensus.--Kubigula (talk) 04:21, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi, I wonder if you would reconsider this close please? The problem, as I stated in the AfD, is that none of the content is verifiable. Though an editor has offered to improve the page, none of the searches that he cited contains reliable sources. The answer, IMHO, is to delete the page and userfy the content. TerriersFan (talk) 20:31, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- I agree that it's a concern. I took another look at what's out there, and I think we may be albe to scrape up some acceptable sourcing. I suggest we give Noah a little time to try and source it, and I'll give it a shot too. If we've worked on it for a month or so without coming up with anything that satisfies me, I'll renom it myself. If you aren't sold, you can renom it, and I won't hassle you for being too quick to bring it up again. A no consensus close doesn't carry much precedential weight, so I don't think there would be a problem with renominating it in a month if two editors have committed to looking for reliable sourcing and haven't come up with anything. Deal?--Kubigula (talk) 21:49, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
- Deal. TerriersFan (talk) 22:48, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Unspecified source for Image:M000067.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:M000067.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:03, 7 March 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 15:03, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Virginia lawyers
Thanks, I have done a few, sort of like my blog | SW Virginia law blog I can write here without annoying my lawyer friends.Swvalaw (talk) 21:17, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Douglas Lockwood
Is Douglas Lockwood notable? I'm iffy on it. -WarthogDemon 01:23, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Remember to provide a reason when you delete
Hey there Kubigula, I'm currently looking at the edits of an admin candidate, and came across a deletion you made tonight. When you delete a page, you need to fill in the box explaining why it was deleted. Here you didn't do so, thus, your rationale is lost. See below:
03:24, 10 March 2008 Kubigula (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "Iserninus" (content was: '{{db-nonsense}} <sup>Superscript text</sup>#REDIRECT #REDIRECT [[Insert text<s><!-- Strike-through text --><blockquote> {| class="wikitable" |- Block quote |}<ref><nowiki>Insert footnote text here<math>Media:Insert formula...')
Thanks, Balloonman (talk) 04:46, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
My request for bureaucratship
Dear Kubigula, thank you for taking part in my RfB. As you may know, it was not passed by bureaucrats.
I would, however, like to thank you for taking the time to voice your support, despite concerns cited by the opposition. Although RfA/B isn't really about a person, but more about the community, I was deeply touched and honoured by the outpouring of support and interest in the discussion. I can only hope that you don't feel your opinion was not considered enough - bureaucrats have to give everyone's thoughts weight.
I also hope that the results of this RfB lead to some change in the way we approach RfBs, and some thought about whether long-entrenched standards are a good thing in our growing and increasingly heterogenous community.
I was a little miserable after the results came out, so I'm going to spread the love via dancing hippos. As you do. :)
I remain eager to serve you as an administrator and as an editor. If at any point you see something problematic in my actions, please do not hesitate to call me out. ~ Riana ⁂ 11:49, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Redirect of Howard ho
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Howard ho, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Howard ho is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Howard ho, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:00, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you!
It's always nice to see good feedback on my work! I just wanted Norfolk receive its due. I may go to Virginia Beach now. Chrisfortier (talk) 14:22, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
Many thanks for your help saving the French Olympic boxer René Dubois! Kind regards Doma-w (talk) 09:26, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Great work
Thanks for the great work you've done on the Kush article, I think you've really turned it around in the right direction. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 19:06, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the kind words :) --Kubigula (talk) 03:32, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
RfA Thanks
| File:Hersfold.JPG | Thanks! |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
Sigh
I'm an idiot, sorry. But thanks for watching my back! Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP!☺ 04:54, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks - Virginia Glee Club assessment
Hi. I'm a relatively recent editor, so I really appreciated your taking the time to assess Virginia Glee Club for WikiProject Virginia, and especially appreciated your assessment of it as a B-grade article. If you have some time, I'd really welcome some specific suggestions for improvement. I have my own roadmap for the article but would appreciate your insights as well. Tjarrett (talk) 17:19, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks - Kosmo Vinyl
I appreciate the refs. My attention span, as well as my time, is limited. Fantailfan (talk) 17:55, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
Your Deletion of my entry - Rum Babas
You state: >Fails WP:MUSIC. Searches yield nothing notable, nor does anything confirm the so called award nomination.
The band were in fact nominated for an Aria award in Australia - Read the spiel on the singers new band and it lists that very fact: http://triplejunearthed.destramusic.com/artists/View.aspx?artistid=3330
>I don't even know the last names of all the members. Don't know why - they were all listed..Sandi Novak, Janelle Novak, Michelle Kerr, Katherine Tulich, Kathryn Cann
* Delete, fails WP:V and possibly fails WP:MUSIC, there are some minor claims to notability like being nominated for an award and a member being in a notable band, but right now I see nothing here to verify that this is not a hoax. No All Music Guide entry, the band's name plus the city they come from returns nothing relevant on Google.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 13:37, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
You lived in Sydney Australia in the late 80's did you ? You know about every independant rock band to perform do you ? So you got minimal hits when you typed the band name into a search engine. The fact that there was minimal info was the main reason I chose to add the band's Wikipedia entry ! The drummer has a new band listed at Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spurs_For_Jesus
* Delete. Some references that are non-reliable and can not be cited exist, which leads me to believe that this is not a hoax. However, if you look at the ARIA list of award nominations ([1]), you can see that for 1990 and 1991 the list of nominees is not present, only the winners are listed. So while I think it is possible that the band meets WP:MUSIC, with no references present, it definitely does not meet WP:V, unless someone has an old newspaper or such. SorryGuy Talk 02:38, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
I will obtain evidence from the Aria people and you will then re-up my article.... (5b3TnY (talk) 09:20, 26 March 2008 (UTC))
AfD nomination of Bob Proctor
An article that you have been involved in editing, Bob Proctor, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Proctor. Thank you. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 15:28, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
Want to see if I'm improving with tags . . . almost tagged this as speedy but didn't since of references to major newspapers and is about a journalist. Since the username is the same as the article's subject though, I slapped it with a coi tag. Was I right in handling this? -WarthogDemon 04:22, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Virginia FAC
Kubigula, I think Virginia is about ready for a Feature Article try. I am wondering if you see anything that might be problematic in the article, and if you'll be around in the next few weeks to help out, as you did for the Good Article try.--Patrick Ѻ 19:35, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, I think those are the choices. I don't think the user is saying we shouldn't uses those, just asking why those. Anyway, I'm trying to find some replacements where I can.--Patrick Ѻ 20:26, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yea, bummer. But it was doomed. If we don't get a support in the first three comments, then no one would be likely to support it. It's kind of a crapshoot, and there were some very picky reasons, like image sandwiching, and specifying private insurance. One thing that I blame myself for is forgetting to criticize our subject in the lead. FAC reviewers, in my experience, look for criticism. Also disappointing was the many things in Minnesota and Oklahoma that were problematic only for Virginia, like those sources, and the USA map that is used for all states. Oh well, I think I'll take a break for a while.--Patrick Ѻ 10:38, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
a.k.a Jersey
No, I hit a couple of wrong buttons. I don't want it deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by B.T. Havoc (talk • contribs) 04:58, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism
Your User Page has been vandalised 67 times now, I reverted for you. Yours, Lord Foppington (talk) 22:21, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- Cheers, always good to know that someone's covering your back in the battle against vandalism! Lord Foppington (talk) 22:29, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Sonic Chronicles: The Dark Brotherhood
Retroactive continuity of reality is constructive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.204.189.19 (talk) 03:08, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the vandalism revert
It seems I am not popular with big-mouthed anons and small-minded socks. :) Your help is appreciated. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 04:27, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
UM IP Vandals
There's a discussion of the UM IP vandals that you have been involved with (and vandalized this page) at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#University_System_of_Maryland_IP_vandals Toddst1 (talk) 00:05, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
I Was The Vandal
User:Kubigula - Please forgive my childishness in vandalizing your talk page. I was the anon IP user that kept blanking your page in a "test" to see how admins would react. You can read about the full undertaking here. Again, I meant you no personal harm or displeasure. Thanks. -- VegitaU (talk) 01:15, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
71.99.
Wanna keep an eye on him if it gets too out of hand? Current one is 71.99.135.115. He appears to be edit warring and making personal attacks again. I won't be online for much longer and I don't wanta come back in the morning discovering that all my edits have been undone by him. So can you please keep watching and block after next move? The Dominator (talk) 04:38, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
137.89.205.146
137.89.205.146 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log) needs admin attention, thx. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:31, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- Never mind, done :-) SandyGeorgia (Talk) 22:31, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Removed Vandalism
I have removed vandalism from your main page. It sees anonymous IP addresses are attracted to your user page. :) // A Raider Like Indiana 19:53, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
- You're welcome // A Raider Like Indiana 21:03, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
An Award
|
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| I award you this barnstar for banning them even before I can give them an unneeded warning lol Rearete (talk) 04:14, 16 April 2008 (UTC) |
Unblock?
Did you use your admin powers to un-block yourself? Ohs noes!! :-P --Kralizec! (talk) 11:52, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
Dogs?
Why do you hate dogs? :( DB9 (talk) 01:23, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Glad I could help you with that vandalism!
DB9 (talk) 01:23, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Jason Sklaver
Thanks for making my deletion reason a bit more clear. Pinkadelica 03:45, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
yo
please go away , I feel uncomfortable being stalked by you Iamtheultimatenoob (talk) 02:47, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- That is true with the first edit, however the second one was an honest mistake. I know you love me though. It's natural. Iamtheultimatenoob (talk) 03:05, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- Because the articles were related. Iamtheultimatenoob (talk) 15:10, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Image for deletion
Hi, I added the speedy deletion tag to Image:Stephen Daly.jpg because it had been specifically uploaded for the now deleted article Stephen Daly. Images are an area of Wikipedia with which I am reasonably unfamiliar, so perhaps you wouldn't mind assisting me. What is an appropriate template to use for images that are used in articles which are subsequently deleted?
The image is not currently used in any article, as you will see if you check for what links to the image. Thanks in advance. LittleOldMe (talk) 12:30, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, that answers my questions. Thank you very much for taking the time to educate me. Regards LittleOldMe (talk) 14:36, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
User talk:Dlohcierekim
thanks. Dlohcierekim 04:35, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
New Project
Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.
If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 02:57, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Ned Kelly
Thanks for that I was getting lost between the vndlsms- your help is appreicated SatuSuro 04:28, 7 May 2008 (UTC) Thanks - yeah I think a group of school kids might pick on it - our other delights are deserts of australia - they seem popular at the mo :( thanks again SatuSuro 04:36, 7 May 2008 (UTC) My favourite for today is however http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Great_Southern_Railway_%28Western_Australia%29 someone has gone into a net cafe and stumbled through google obviously and left the message - not realising its a wikipedia talk page of a service that hasnt had a passenger for over 20 years at least :( SatuSuro 04:40, 7 May 2008 (UTC) Nah - its a recent derrailment of the Great Southern Railway who do the passenger services across the Nullarbor - hasnt bothered to see the Western Australian qualifier in the title - we all do it i suppose - sigh :( SatuSuro 04:46, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
not sure what you mean.
i dont even know who herman li is, let alone have i been editing his page. what did someone use my ip address to change it to? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.201.104.37 (talk) 18:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for help with U1 subpage deletion
Sunny910910 (talk|Contributions|Guest) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Hey Kubigula, just wanted to stop by and say thanks for helping me delete those old subpages (thats what the smile is for). Anyway, I don't want to distract you from your adminstrative duties so I'll keep this short and just say "thanks".--Sunny910910 (talk|Contributions|Guest) 01:23, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
1 year? Why not indefinite? Gurchzilla (talk) 04:24, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Check your blocking reasons
You may want to be careful. [2] Later. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 04:25, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
You posted an indefinite block message on AbuBaydat's talk page (thanks, btw), but the log here doesn't show a block listed. Is the log not supposed to record indef blocks? Thanks, Aylad ['ɑɪlæd] 20:56, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Never mind, I figured it out. The log would have shown any blocks AbuBaydat placed, not those placed on him/her. Sorry! Aylad ['ɑɪlæd] 21:11, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Thank you - I am SLOWLY figuring things out. At least I figured out how to write you back. lol. I understand the you tube controversy - I finally figured it out when I read a little in depth. The video is great for Clint's Wikipedia page though {it's him reading some of his own material for a gallery display - and a big one to boot} - if I host it to another server is there a way to link or list it on his wikipedia page? Thanks!Tallulah13 (talk) 05:45, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey! You rejected my Speedy Deletion...
...for the recently created article Chad Perrone -- and I wanted to say that you were correct! I reviewed your comments and re-reviewed the context of the article, and you were 100% right. I just wanted to thank you for doing a great job and for making this fine catch. Be well! Ecoleetage (talk) 12:38, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hey, tell ya what. For the sake of academic curiosity, I will submit it to AfD and see if it stands there for the full debate. And I am glad that you got a smile from my message. Here's another smile for you:
Ecoleetage (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Be well and thanks! Ecoleetage (talk) 04:05, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hey, good to see your input in the AfD for Chad Perrone. How do you think it will wind up? I suspect people will follow your lead and opt for redirect. Hope all is well. Thanks! Ecoleetage (talk) 12:16, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hello again! Well, it took 16 days (16 days?), but it appears that the article on Chad Perrone was deemed insufficient and was erased. Poor Chad. Oh well, hope life is good for you today! Ecoleetage (talk) 17:51, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
You've already warned him about vandalism, he's up to more tricks with the AT4 article, constantly changing the caliber to 83 mm and reverting the corrections by other editors. GMan552 (talk) 02:10, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Image
Thanks for your note, Kubigula. The reason I like to keep copies of animal rights-related images is that in the past they've been deleted from the Commons, even when they're PD and once even with an OTRS ticket. It's a subject that can trigger strong feelings, which is perhaps why it happens. For that reason, from then on, I have requested that local copies be kept of images that I know are being used in articles. Best, SlimVirgin talk|edits 04:38, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Could you add a tag with the OTRS ticket number to the page? Hippo (talk) 03:17, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Star Treks: Which Is The Best?
Which is the Best Star Treks? Oncelersgrove (talk) 03:54, 11 June 2008 (UTC) Oncelersgrove (talk) 03:54, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
Reversion of block notice
Hi Kubigula, a page protect might be warranted here: [3]. Cheers, JNW (talk) 05:13, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you for your reply. I sometimes have slim patience for those who vandalize without repentance, then seek to expunge the evidence of their disruptions. I am glad that administrators can view such histories, regardless. Many thanks again, JNW (talk) 18:44, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi Kubigula. You recently deleted Photos of Flames, but not its talk page, which should probably be deleted too... « D. Trebbien (talk) 03:54 2008 June 15 (UTC)
- Done - thanks for the reminder.--Kubigula (talk) 03:55, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Proper Interval Locality
I would like to appeal against the deletion of article named “Proper Interval locality”
on the following grounds: -
1. There is no website with the name “proper interval locality.” 2. The article was written specifically for Wikipedia and not copied from another website. 3. As for the point about notability I wrote the article in response to calls from wikipedians. This was last year but I was only recently informed about the interest in the topic.
Info on Drake
Is sourced with a legit webpage, please undo your fivilous reverting. Thanks. --SmackingMonkeys (talk) 05:18, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not the first? Other people must agree then. Who makes you the dictator of Wikipedia? --SmackingMonkeys (talk) 05:27, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
- Are you an admin? Please see my User talk:UWMSports#WTF. Monkey has violated the three-revert rule on the drake page as well. Not to mention all of his edits have been forms of vandalism. --UWMSports (talk) 05:38, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Edits to Atoka
They may have been unconstructive, but they were pretty darn hilarious! Caliente001 (talk) 05:30, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
I think we cross-huggled :) Livitup (talk) 03:42, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- We did. For some reason you weren't on the Huggle whitelist yet, but I fixed that :).--Kubigula (talk) 03:48, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
- Why, thank you, kind sir. Happy huggling. :) Livitup (talk) 04:08, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Happy Independence Day!
As you are a nice Wikipedian, I just wanted to wish you a happy Independence Day! And if you are not an American, then have a happy day and a wonderful weekend anyway! :) Your friend and colleague, --Happy Independence Day! Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 00:40, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Agecroft Hall
I have e-mailed friends in Richmond to see if we can accomplish the image request. I left a note to that effect on the WP:VA page. Nice to hear from you. Mark Mark in Historic Triangle of Virginia (talk) 05:27, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
main page comment
I responded to your note on the Talk page for the main page, just wanted to flag it in case you forgot - Tempshill (talk) 16:59, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks! :)
I appericate your unblocking me and your faith in me. I will hold up to my promises and comments made on my talk page.
I do have one question (more like a clarification): would "avoid editing the same pages as JPG", be not editing any radio pages or just pages he frequents. I want to make sure I am clear on that before I begin editing so we are all on the same page.
Again, thank you for your confidence and I appericate it :) Take Care....NeutralHomer T:C 22:59, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- I figured you were offline for the night so I asked Acroterion (I asked Firsfron first, but he was offline also) and he answered my question. I, as always, welcome input, and you can post that on my talk page. Take Care...NeutralHomer T:C 01:16, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
- Okie Dokie....he used to edit Michigan pages (I think he is from there) and update (for FCC listings and MOS) for everything else, so I will do my best to give him room. I used to edit things in Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland, and Pennsylvania (and elsewhere if I have information...callsign changes, format changes, etc.)...but I will try and steer clear of places where we may come in contact. Thanks for the input. Take Care and Have a Good Evening...NeutralHomer T:C 01:24, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
- I was going to go that route (kinda steer clear of WP:WPRS pages) and stick with WP:TVS pages and some WikiVirginia Project pages (there are some pages in Frederick County, Virginia I can update). Plus I just noticed the post Acroterion about the redlinks in the Virginia section of National Register of Historic Places, so that is something I can work on (I think a few are in Frederick County). He said it best...it's a big Wiki.
- Okie Dokie....he used to edit Michigan pages (I think he is from there) and update (for FCC listings and MOS) for everything else, so I will do my best to give him room. I used to edit things in Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland, and Pennsylvania (and elsewhere if I have information...callsign changes, format changes, etc.)...but I will try and steer clear of places where we may come in contact. Thanks for the input. Take Care and Have a Good Evening...NeutralHomer T:C 01:24, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
- I just updated the TV3 Winchester (TV Station in Winchester, VA) article and was going to take a look around the WikiProject Virginia and see where I could help. Take Care....NeutralHomer T:C 01:33, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
A WikiProject Question
Acroterion put the idea in my head (and it's a fun idea too), so I am working on a page for the Newtown-Stephensburg Historic District (currently on my sandbox page)...is there anything via the Virginia WikiProject that I should add or is this something part of another project?
The whole thing might take awhile....150 buildings, lots o' history there. Just want to have my ducks in a row. Take Care....NeutralHomer T:C 04:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
A Heads Up
I hope I didn't overstep any bounds, but I updated some ownership information on a couple local (to me) radio stations. AM and FM along with WWRT, WWRE, WBQB, and WFVA officially became owned by Centennial Broadcasting, who bought them out in April of 2007. Hopefully, I didn't do anything wrong. Take Care....NeutralHomer T:C 05:35, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
- Cool, just wanted to make sure. I am not sure what to put up on my userpage :) I have what the page looked like before (I would leave out that one banner that got me in trouble, of course) but, I was thinking of doing something new for my new start....so I am debating what to put up there :) If you have any ideas (or you want to add something) let me know. Take Care and Have a Great Friday....NeutralHomer T:C 03:45, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Racial Slurs
I Just wanted to bring to your attention the errors on the page for Manassas, VA. I attempted to edit the page to remove all offensive material, and it was promptly undone. When i attempted to re-apply my changes, i recieved a vandalism warning from you. please review the page for yourself and see if you think it is currently accurate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.240.136.80 (talk) 17:58, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
- The Racial slurs on the page for Manassas have returned. I've attempted to edit them back to the correct state, but the same user keeps undoing any changes. thanks for your time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.240.136.80 (talk • contribs) 13:04, 24 July 2008
- I took care of it; Blindname (talk · contribs) has been blocked for 31 hours. --Kralizec! (talk) 18:13, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
- Excellent - I like when problems are already taken care of before I even here about them :).--Kubigula (talk) 03:27, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- I took care of it; Blindname (talk · contribs) has been blocked for 31 hours. --Kralizec! (talk) 18:13, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
Recent deletion of List of Mobile Banking Vendors Article
Hi Kubigula, I just wanted to say that I don't think your recently closure of this deletion discussion was very balanced. I'm my opinion there was no consensus. Each of the users pro delete raised different concerns each of which I responded to. You conclusion that not enough of the companies had articles was only raised by one of the editors. Why not just delete the ones without links in that case, rather than the whole page? It is not the fault of this article that Wikipedia does not have entries for these companies. Just becuase they are specialist, does that make them not notable? Sosh (talk) 11:45, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Battle of Ofira
I would like you to reconsider the candidacy of this article for deletion. It seems highly unreasonable and extremely biased. No sources other than the official Israeli sources are mentioned as references for the article. Sherif9282 July 26, 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.235.66.205 (talk) 22:16, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
A Favor to Ask
I noticed an edit that JPG made on WTBZ's station page. I, obviously, can't message him (and wouldn't) to say his correction was wrong. WTBZ is now WVUS (an AM station) and does carry a "Timeless Favorites" (or Big Band) format. So, the changes the anon user made, were correct. I don't want to edit that page immediately after him, so would you mind putting the information in for me? Also, it would require a page move from WTBZ to WVUS.
In case you are wondering, I had WTBZ on my watchlist from before I was blocked. Thank you....NeutralHomer T:C 23:03, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
- After about 24 hours between his edit and mine, I decided I would be safe to edit the WTBZ page (I hope I was) and moved the page to WVUS (per the FCC database) and updated it accordingly. Hoep you have a great weekend...NeutralHomer T:C 02:15, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- No worries, I figured you were taking a little vacation from the internet. As nice as it was this weekend, I can't blame ya :)
- Ah, sorry about that. I edited 24 hours after he did (spaced my edit out, so I wasn't editing immediately after him). I will do the talk page thing from now on. Again, sorry about that. Take Care...NeutralHomer T:C 23:20, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
A "Video" Question
A friend (working on a page here) asked if Wikipedia accepts video files. I wasn't sure if we do or not (I know audio files are accepted). Does Wikipedia accept video files? Thanks....NeutralHomer T:C 01:25, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- Firsfron helped me with this one :) Take Care...NeutralHomer T:C 10:47, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Dingbat2007 Sockpuppet
Hello....Dingbat2007 has another one of his Rebafan sockpuppets. I made several attempts to report it to AIV, but kept getting the "whys" and "How do these edits qualify as vandalism?". Soooo, I am giving up and I will leave this one up to you. I don't need to get in trouble trying to get a sockpuppet blocked. Take Care....NeutralHomer T:C 10:47, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
- I just signed on, officially for today, (had insomnia until 12:30 this afternoon) and noticed your message. I gave up completely when, after 8 hours, the report was removed from AIV. That annoyed me, so I just watched some TV. If I see anymore of those, I will let you or Firsfron know, so I don't get myself in any trouble getting angry at a report sitting there. Thanks for looking into it though :) Hope you have a great Tuesday....NeutralHomer T:C 03:44, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks on both points :) I normally don't see them (the sockpuppets) unless they pop up on my watchlist. It's rare, but it does happen. When I see one come across, I will let you know. Have a Good Night and a Great Tuesday (I think I am going to "crash" again myself)....NeutralHomer T:C 04:57, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Request for Review
I noticed that you recently added a tag to the talk page of Virginia Tech Hokies football seasons, and was wondering if you'd be willing to check my math on that page. I've added everything up a few times, but my totals don't match those of the 2008 media guide, which says that Tech has 648 total wins. I'd appreciate the help. Thanks. JKBrooks85 (talk) 07:07, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you ever so much. No wonder my math wasn't adding up! I appreciate the time it must've taken you to track that down. It is mind-numbing work, but if I can get the information out there, it makes it easier for the next person to track down what they need. That page in particular will also be a help when I undertake the task of getting Virginia Tech Hokies football to FA status, which will be a couple months off, I think. Thanks again, and if you ever need a hand with something, don't hesitate to ask. JKBrooks85 (talk) 04:11, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
- The most important thing with FAC is to not give up -- it's an often frustrating and grueling process that can take weeks, but to me, the end result has always been worthwhile. JKBrooks85 (talk) 04:35, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Discussion of my article Page
Pls favor in keeping deletion/discussion page of Brhmaand Pujan , Naresh Sonee strictly confidential/un accesable as it is giving wrong signal to the seeker when it get hit on search engines.This has been requested by legal dept. of said pages. Under your expert guidence i may start this page soon. --Dralansun (talk) 03:14, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Let Me Pass An Idea By You
I was helping revert some vandalism edits on the TV Station pages (via WP:TVS and found it was really hard to do manually and keep up. Do you think it would be a good idea for me to readd PopUps and TWINKLE? I know my monobook page was erased/blocked for awhile because I was edit-warring with TWINKLE. I don't, of course, intend to do that again. Which why I thought I would ask you your opinion. I think being able to revert quickly is good (and I don't mind helping out), but I don't want to add something like that and upset anyone, which is why I haven't. What do you think? Thanks...NeutralHomer T:C 04:41, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks! I will add PopUps in a couple (dinner time in a minute) and whenever you think it is cool, let me know and I will TWINKLE. Take Care and Have a Great Weekend....NeutralHomer T:C 22:26, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Adam Beason
A tag has been placed on Adam Beason requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. — Dædαlus Contribs /Improve 09:05, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
hey whyd u delete my page? what did i do? Axcxrule91 (talk) 16:30, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
Restoration request
Please restore Carrom Federation of Sri Lanka to User:Hpt lucky/Carrom Federation of Sri Lanka (Hpt lucky being the principal author of most of the carrom articles). As you can probably tell from what's going on on his user page, a bunch of articles on verifiable information about national International Carrom Federation affiliates are subject to merge discussion (and one AFD, which should conclude with a "merge" result, and some prods which I've replaced with merge tags). The CFSL article probably does not need to be an article by itself, but the information in it is easily verifiable, and the article should not (arguably; I have not taken the matter up at WP:DRV) have been deleted on notability grounds, despite the AfD results on this article, since a national-level sports governing body is notable by definition. I strongly suspect that the eventual consensus will be to merge all of this stuff in to the ICF article, and that's what I'm pushing for myself. The merge will go faster and smoother if this user (almost certainly the one who will produce the merged article) is provided a copy back of the CFSL article (with the proviso that the point is to merge the content, not to re-create the CFSL article separately). — SMcCandlish [talk] [cont] ‹(-¿-)› 01:02, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
- Sounds like a decent plan and a reasonable request. So, I've restored the article to the user subpage. Let me know if you need any further assistance.--Kubigula (talk) 03:37, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
It is original.
Here's the source. Sorry, but I don't know how to put it in. The conversation did occur.
http://dconservative.blogspot.com/2008/08/is-this-end-of-jidf.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayhoffer (talk • contribs) 15:44, 8 August 2008 (UTC)
Fcode
Thank you for closing the AfD. I wanted to do that myself, but not being an admin, I don't think I can. --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 05:01, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
- Alright, thanks for the advice. I wasn't aware I could close ones for delete. Do I just put a {{db-somethingoranother}} on the article? --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 05:06, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
- That is true; I can see why. I shall limit that business to things I've not done. --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 05:09, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Well, I'll just chip away at the massive backlog anyway and skip over what I can't do, and wait for an RfA. Night! --Falcon Darkstar Kirtaran (talk) 05:28, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Virginia Head's Up
Hello, just wanted to let you know, you may see all the TV Stations in Virginia pop up on the assessment page of the project. Earlier this evening, I put the WP:VA template and the WP:TVS templates in a dropdown menu (like this one here). I didn't make any changes to how the pages were assessed though.
Sooo, if you see them show up on the assessment page, now you know :) Take Care and Have a Great Week Ahead...NeutralHomer • Talk 05:44, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
AfD closure
This AfD should be closed here: [4] because the nominator, Ffighter44, has changed his mind and voted to keep the article. Cheers, Artene50 (talk) 09:08, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Map images, new user for Petersburg history
You may have noticed the very good map image in the new Virginia Capital Trail article. This was done at my request for WP by User:Hlj, who has a talent in this area and works on many articles related to the American Civil War, of which, Virginia was the major battlefield. I am sure he would occasionally help with similar needs for other WP:VA articles if we asked. I have extended a nice thank already, and any other acknowledgment of his work might also be in good taste. We also have a new contributor for Petersburg, Virginia, User:Dulaney Ward. Early indications are that he also has a lot to add to our efforts and should be encouraged. Just my thoughts, hope all is well with you. Mark in Historic Triangle of Virginia (talk) 05:02, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Ping
If you direct your attention to your mailbox, you will notice the pilot has turned on the "You Have Mail" sign. Thank You...NeutralHomer • Talk 04:03, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
User:70.128.184.187
How do we make this person stop making wonderful edits to the article on Jayne Mansfield? A block? Aditya(talk • contribs) 08:03, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Restoratin request for Oklahoma GI Rights Hotline
It looks like I didn't move quick enough on improving this article. I am still working on it (I need to visit the library to get the date of the print newspaper article I cited, and need to hunt down some more sources), so in the meantime would you consider restoring what was previously at Oklahoma GI Rights Hotline to User:Jmbranum/Oklahoma GI Rights Hotline. Thanks! --Jmbranum (talk) 03:20, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
Blacksburg, Virginia update
I have decided to put up what I have done with the History section in the Blacksburg, Virginia article. If you feel that anything needs to be added, moved, or deleted, please let me know. I have also made a timeline with references that is viewable here. I would like to use it in some way in the article. Let me know what you think. Talk to ya later! Pmcginty (talk) 01:46, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
Vaoverland
I had sorta backed off on the Jamestown article, and will need to revisit that issue about splitting it. I am working nights now in Williamsburg and many times have an hour or two to look in on WP stuff. I have a Q. Is there a bot or such that we could use to get articles started and up to stub level for the many Virginia school divisions which do not have articles yet? I think other users would embrace adding if we had a very basic framework in place. As it is, in some cases, there are individual articles about a particular public school, but not the school division (aka district). Thoughts? It's OK to copy this over to the Wikiproject Virginia page if you think appropriate. All the best, Vaoverland (talk) 06:05, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
Hey
Just popping in to hello...."Hello" :) That's it. Take Care...NeutralHomer • Talk 04:21, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
- Oh yeah, things are going fine (in between sneezes...allergies). Am working on the WVEK-FM article right now. They moved from Cumberland, Kentucky to Weber City, Virginia (near Bristol) on Friday. My "To-Do List" is still jammed packed...I am having fun :) Take Care and Have a Great Weekend...NeutralHomer • Talk 04:44, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
- Oh yeah, there will be more of those pop up on the WPVA lists. There is a user who is making state-by-state format templates (like one template for all the country stations in one station or all classic rock stations). So, I have been updating those and tagging them with the WPVA templates.
- Plus, I am going through all the Virginia radio stations and updating them with infoboxes (some don't have them), correct linkage, even market templates (stations in Martinsville and Danville were left out for some reason). That is my big thing at the moment.
- I will think about adding TWINKLE, right now I am doing it manually and it seems to be working fine. I will let you know when I do.
- Oh, in case you don't have the news on, Obama picked Joe Biden as his Veep. Little news for your weekend and probably two pages that will need protected in the next couple minutes. Take Care...NeutralHomer • Talk 05:07, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
- They (the Obama camp) wanted to wait until Saturday....I knew it would be early Saturday morning. Of course the big news channels are in full breaking news mode. :) Take Care and Have a Great Weekend...NeutralHomer • Talk 05:14, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, in case you don't have the news on, Obama picked Joe Biden as his Veep. Little news for your weekend and probably two pages that will need protected in the next couple minutes. Take Care...NeutralHomer • Talk 05:07, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Virginia school divisions
I can't promise anything, as I'm about to start a new job come Monday. But I'd be happy to try and work out something in the evenings, starting maybe tomorrow.
And thank you very much for the kind words; they're much appreciated. --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 04:51, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks kindly - I'll see what I can come up with tomorrow afternoon. --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 05:15, 23 August 2008 (UTC)
Ping (2)
Attention Wikipedia-Mart customers, we currently have a bluelight special on new emails in Kubigula's inbox. Brand new emails for only $2.99, for the next 5 minutes! Thank you for shopping Wikipedia-Mart. - NeutralHomer • Talk 22:56, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Copy deleted file
You deleted Image:American Football Positions. It appears that whomever moved the file to commons did it incorrectly. Can you copy the deleted SVG and upload it to the commons Image:American Football Positions? Without the original SVG, the links to the file come up as broken. -- kainaw™ 14:09, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
--Kubigula (talk) 22:33, 27 August 2008 (UTC)== Few more deletion requests ==
If it's not too much trouble, can you delete the following pages?
- User talk:LeiaY/Archives/2008/April
- User talk:LeiaY/Archives/2008/February
- User talk:LeiaY/Archives/2008/January
- User talk:LeiaY/Archives/2008/June
- User talk:LeiaY/Archives/2008/March
- User talk:LeiaY/Archives/2008/May
- User:LeiaY/huggle.css
- User:LeiaY/modern.js
- User:LeiaY/monobook.css
- User:LeiaY/monobook.js
Thank you! Glacier Wolf 22:28, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Done :)--Kubigula (talk) 22:33, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
reverse.jpg){kind=link}
210.18.215.130 needs to be blocked - again...
Back to his/her old vandalism - thanks --Marjaliisa (talk) 23:59, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Striving for the General Notability Guideline
Hi Kubigula, Thank you for editing my article and wikifying them. Is there anything else I can do or add to the Healthy Kids SCA wikipage to meet the General Notability Guidelines? Thanks again for your assistance --Rebecca brennan (talk) 06:29, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
BLPSE et al
Thank you for the notice. I've responded at WT:UTM. Much appreciated, UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 12:26, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
random question
Hello. I hope this finds you well. When I first made my wiki account many months ago, you helped me with getting a video link added to Clint Catalyst's page, so I thought that maybe you could offer your help again for my most recent inquiry. :) I still don't know a lot about wikipedia & Clint's page is pretty much the only listing that I ever edit, so I hope you do not mind my asking for your help from time to time. Anyway - on to my question... I added a new image to Clint's listing & I plan to add more. I have gotten permission from the photogropher/s that hold copyright, but I do not know where to send a copy of that permission message. When you have time, please tell me what i need to do. Thanks! -TallyTallulah13 (talk) 05:01, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
Hello
Hey Kubigula, got a bit of a concern. IP user 75.108.73.219 has been making edits to TV station pages adding DTV information. This, in and of itself, is just fine (no problems from me here). What I do have a problem with is how the user is going about making the edits.
For example, with WATM-TV, the user wiped out an entire section ("ABC 23 News Anchors As Of Final Broadcast") and used the == == brackets from that section to create the "Digital Television" section. In some cases, the user has even combined the "Digital Television" section they are adding with another unrelated section. The user has done this before and I showed the user about a week ago how to create headers using the == == brackets, obviously to no avail.
To me, I think it is someone who is unexperienced at editing Wikipedia and I don't think they mean any harm to the project (they are doing some good work adding information that needs to be added), but I worry about some of the information being "swapped out" to add the "Digital Television" information may be lost. Would you mind having a word with them? Thanks and Take Care...NeutralHomer • Talk 15:28, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, I appericate it :) I had to throw a couple vandalism warnings their way, unfortunately, because they keep taking away the references section to the WTLV page. I really wish I didn't have to do that :( - NeutralHomer • Talk 06:10, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
Ping (3)
You have one new message. To view to your one new message, please go to your mailbox and then press 1. *beep* Thank you. - NeutralHomer • Talk 11:55, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
- I think I am running out of these funny ways to say "you have mail" :) - NeutralHomer • Talk 11:56, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Can you delete this redirected talk page, as you did to Talk:Can't Happen Here (disambiguation)? Please reply below, Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 21:17, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
- The "Cant Happen Here" talk page had no content other than being a useless leftover talk page redirect. I regard that deletion as uncontroversial cleanup. The Dragon Ball Characters template talk does have some actual discussion content in the history. Not much value to WP there, but I don't think it quite falls under G6.--Kubigula (talk) 21:53, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
A RFPP Issue
Would you mind giving my a second opinion on this RFPP request please? If you need more information, please ask....there is alot. Thanks...NeutralHomer • Talk 01:38, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
CSD
Just a question would there be a CSD that would cover résumés? I've been prodding them when I find them but I was just wondering if there was a faster way of getting rid of them. Whispering 04:38, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
- I'll keep that in mind. I can always wait five days. Wikipedia zen and all that jazz. Whispering 04:57, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Ted Stahl page
Thank you for your help. I am trying to figure this out and it is good that Wikipedia has such vigiliant editors watching out to keep the site neutral. I understand. I will rewrite to be compliant. It is a good exercise. There is another great article that was published about Ted in Dec 2007 by DBusiness, a Crain publication, but I can't find it online, I only have a pdf of the article. Is that something that can be included as a reference? --Karinbellinghausen (talk) 22:27, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks but it looks like someone already deleted the talk page so I guess I will just start from scratch again. You have to be fast on this site! Thanks again for giving me some hope, I was getting very discouraged by the other deleters. --Karinbellinghausen (talk) 23:03, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. I found them all again, and more. I started rewriting and then got some kind of lockout message. --Karinbellinghausen (talk) 23:52, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Ted Stahl (Inventor and Entrepreneur)
That's what I am kicking myself for not doing now...I thought I had a decent article with references, etc... and it was up for 5 minutes and then speedily deleted. I can't even figure out how to put the hangon thing on there and they delete it...there was also a suggestion about a template but I can't find it at all anymore so I guess I will just start from scratch again. This time they didn't say blatant advertisting, but something about it not being relevant. How does one judge relevance? Why is a heat press relevant but not the man who invented one? --Karinbellinghausen (talk) 02:28, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
Hey Dude
Hope your week is going well :) Could you do me a favor? Could you take a look at the WTOP-FM page? I moved some things around, updated the infobox, moved a couple paragraphs to their own section, but the whole thing is still bugging me. It looks cluttered (especially with the history section) and it seems disconnected from it's frequency's former self WGMS. There is, of course, information about WTOP on other pages (like WWWT, WFED, among others), so the page is super disconnected. Any help you can give (or ideas), would be appericated. Take Care and Have a Great Friday...NeutralHomer • Talk 05:26, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
- I do greatly appericate your help on that one. I will keep an eye on the page so it doesn't get disconnected again.
- You would be proud of me right now. Mass purge of all television market templates from Wikipedia and even though I am massively pissed, I haven't lost my temper (came close though, but walked away for a couple). - NeutralHomer • Talk 05:09, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
- As did I and I didn't have that much to begin with. I am worried if Wikipedia allowed this from Nielsen, if Arbitron could do the same on the radio end. Which would just wipe out WP:WPRS. Personally, I think it is time to create a "Media Pedia" for radio and television stations, cable and satellite networks, newspapers and the like. It would make things sooooooo much easier. - NeutralHomer • Talk 05:23, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
Ping (4)
Will the owner of The Sparky Barnstar please report to their userpage, your lights are on. - NeutralHomer • Talk 05:07, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
- You're Welcome :) Hope your day gets better :) - NeutralHomer • Talk 19:26, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
For the vandalism fix. Those are some mighty strange moves and edits.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:08, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Heyas
Have you checked your email lately? - NeutralHomer • Talk 05:35, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
mynovelspace.com
Ref: 04:44, 14 August 2008 Kubigula (Talk | contribs) deleted "Novel writing" (CSD G11: Blatant Advertising)
Hi - just wanted to clarify - this IS NOT a blatant advertisement - this is actually a site introducing the 21st century technology of writing books - either independently or as a collaboration with friends/family. The concept is to encourage the use of technology (and in itself saves the environment 'GREEN') and also encourages social networking with the ability to collaborate on a novel.
Could you please review the submission and advise or provide some direction as to how best to word this article so it is read as an article and not advertisement. This site sells nothing - in fact the membership is free - there are no fees.
I appreceiate your time and consideration, Best regards, Yvonne Davies yvonnedavies@rogers.com --Ydavies (talk) 03:35, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Hi Kubigula - wasn't sure if you received my previous email - I am working on the re-write for myNOVELspace.com
It definately is not an advertisement - as the site sells nothing - it is more to do with social networking - and more to the point - the 21st way of writing a novel - either on your own with a group that you choose to collaborate with.
Should I forward you the re-write Kubigula?
Also, thanks again for getting back to me so promptly - I really appreciate your assistance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ydavies (talk • contribs) 17:08, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Hi Kubigula - me again not sure if I sent the reply to your response correctly...
Just wanted to say thank-you for your help - it's greatly appreciated. I am working on re-writing the article in order that it does not read as promotional. I am hoping to cause the same affect as a Facebook or MySpace - however, this has a take away - especially for children and youths - to be able to write a book either on their own or with a group - that they will be able to share with friends and family - how cool is that....it's not just the highest score from a game of i.e. 'Halo' etc. but it's a new way of playing on the internet - educational, yet social networking too.
When I complete the revision Kubigula - should I send to you directly for review?
Thanks again for your help and support - it's much appreciated Ydavies (talk) 13:57, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for deleting my sandbox
I made a new sandbox. I think it is safe and will not help any Wikipedia thingies. Johndoeemail (talk) 02:00, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
My User Page
Cheers for reverting teh vandalism. :) X MarX the Spot (talk) 02:09, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
WP:VA Barnstar
I created a barnstar (sorta) for WP:VA. It's, essentially, the Editor's Barnstar with the Seal of Virginia in the middle. It isn't great, but it would give the project it's own Barnstar. I added it to the WP:VA talk page, where people could use their photoshop skills and make it better. What do you think? Take Care...NeutralHomer • Talk 03:01, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
- If the people at WP:Awards like it (I guess I have to get their approval first) and I think a couple people over there might retool it (I kinda threw it together), I will add it to the WP:Virginia page for others to use :) If you want to take a crack at retooling, please feel free :) Take Care...NeutralHomer • Talk 00:55, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
FYI.
This happened because i created TronixCountry, which got censored repeatedly; finally I got screwed over this (archive: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:IReceivedDeathThreats/ANI-being-fucked-with) - a claim that my username was disruptive. Seems some cabal or set of sock puppets ganged up on me. Maybe you want to help save TronixCountry from deletion. I need a break. Last straw was when someone with more than regular admin powers deleted some discussion points I'd made on my talk page and Daniel Case's - and deleted them from history too.
- Ah, no wonder I thought I was being ganged up on - I was. —Preceding unsigned comment added by IRDT (talk • contribs) 07:12, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
- I got your message, but I'm not sure I understand it. Have we had some interaction before?--Kubigula (talk) 01:07, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
- IRDT was created (when admin advised me to create the add'l username) by me, AKA user IReceivedDeathThreats. Connection is Blue Hippo offshoot TronixCountry.--IRDT (talk) 19:06, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Ping (5)
Thanks for listening to the "You Have Mail" Radio Network, playing all your "You Have Mail" hits....OK, I might have ran out on these. :( Take Care....NeutralHomer • Talk • Work • October 5, 2008 @ 02:58
Undo the delete for User: JoeCool950--JoeCool950 (talk) 04:56, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Please put all of my contents back onto User: JoeCool950 PLEASE!!! If you have it copied somewhere, paste it back, or undo the delete--JoeCool950 (talk) 05:06, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Please, I'm waiting for all of the contents that were deleted from the page to be put back on there. I'm the user of the page and want it back up there how it was before the delete. If you could do an undelte or something!!!! Please let me know--JoeCool950 (talk) 05:24, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
Restoration Request
Sorry for all of the messages, but I would just like my user page restored User: JoeCool950. Can't remember everything that was on that page. I remembered some of the stuff, but not all of it. Please restore it back for me. This is an reasonable request since I'm the user of the page. Just need it restored for me by tomorrow sometime. Thanks.--JoeCool950 (talk) 05:51, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
An Email
You gots one...perhaps two! - NeutralHomer • Talk • October 12, 2008 @ 22:27
MYNOVELSPACE
To whom do I resubmit revised article copy - thanks :)
Yvonne
Ydavies (talk) 21:31, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
Virginia articles, redux
I'm not sure I'm going to be able to continue - there's been a bit of a dustup over some of my recent stubs. Have a look at my talk page for the gory details.
Not to whine to teacher, but if I do decide to continue regardless, I should hope that the plaudits and requests I had on the subject from multiple other users would make some difference. --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 05:05, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
- Saw your note on my talk page - many thanks. --User:AlbertHerring Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla! 16:21, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
Middlesex Lodge
Not sure why you would have deleted the Middlesex Lodge website. It was not using copywritten information with out permission, I felt that it was an unbiased factual history of the lodge and it was not there as an advertisement. I truly believe that this lodge is an important lodge in the history of Massachussetts lodges as it was one of the first chartered lodges in Mass by then grand master Paul Revere.
Since this is my first attempt to submit an article and I can't see that I had done anything wrong could you explain your actions to me? Middlesexlodge (talk) 03:45, 18 October 2008 (UTC)Adam R user: middlesexlodge
Josh Titus
Sorry just messing around wont happen again —Preceding unsigned comment added by JSH TTS (talk • contribs) 05:16, 20 October 2008 (UTC)
Thank you...
... for reverting the vandalism of my Talk page. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 02:05, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
User:Mingushead000/Error
Are you sure you want to decline? He has cleaned up the pages quite a bit since I requested that they be deleted, and they are in userspace. However, they are not in his userspace. Wronkiew (talk) 03:25, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
- I wasn't sure what to do with them myself. Your plan sounds good. Wronkiew (talk) 06:02, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
Consumer
Hello--Thanks for trimming that POV. I saw it when I was reverting the vandalism, but didn't want to deal with it. I'm glad someone else did :). CRETOG8(t/c) 02:09, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
- And thank you for the comment - nice to know people notice the little stuff. That article seems to attract junk - probably 95% of the edits are vandalism or odd POV stuff.--Kubigula (talk) 02:17, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
Reverted vandalism on my user page
Thanks for the favor back. :D -- SRE.K.Annoyomous.L.24[c] 01:36, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
Re: Hey there
Not a problem. I was normally doing something your page got hit, but I was around to update the counter :) Please let me know if you need help on the Stephens City page this weekend. Take Care....NeutralHomer • Talk • October 24, 2008 @ 15:56
Image Copyright
Hey, I haven't check up on my contribution to the Kimmel Center page in a while and I was a little surprised to see that my images were taken down. I am the photographer behind those pictures. I just changed the flickr copyright status to Attributed Creative Commons. - User:Jon91870
STOP DELETING MY EDITS!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.178.244.22 (talk) 03:50, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Take a look at that username of his: User:Scottgrizzleisaloseer. I left a UW-Username on there. Should I go ahead and report it to the ANB? Thx! ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez Get to know me! / Talk to me!←at≈:→ 04:19, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Personality rights and speedy delete image crtieria
G'day Kubigula - I wondered if you might be kinda active in the image area, and might be prepared to help me get to know our current guidelines a bit.. I'm interested in how folk's 'Personality Rights' might work with the policies really, and whether or not we might need to add a bit to the current speedy deletion image criteria? I'm concerned that that 'bride' pic might have potential for harm greater than it's benefit to the project, even to the point on wondering whether it might be best to delete it straight away? Whaddya reckon? cheers, Privatemusings (talk) 04:38, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
Kev Fest was just recreated
FYI Enigma message 05:37, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
- Cheers - took me a second to figure out what was going on with that article, but it's clearly V3. Thanks for the note.--Kubigula (talk) 05:44, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
A Mail...
...you gots one. - NeutralHomer • Talk • October 28, 2008 @ 01:42
- Gotta love LOLcats, they change English for the better :) - NeutralHomer • Talk • October 28, 2008 @ 01:43
AIV
Got a little problem with User:Jesse49, massive vandalism and is a sockpuppet of User:Dingbat2007. COuld you please help? - NeutralHomer • Talk • October 30, 2008 @ 02:21
- User:Daniel Case took care of it. Was getting a little hairy there for a second. - NeutralHomer • Talk • October 30, 2008 @ 02:29
- User:Dingbat2007 uses socks with the same names like Rebafan, Fran, Jesse, or Word and a number (ie: Jesse##). See Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Dingbat2007. What User:Dhett or Blueboy96 do is give a Warn4im warning and revert all edits regardless if they are correct or not on sight. I personally don't agree with the last part because some good edits do get lost in the mix, but I respect their decision on that one. Most of Dingbat2007's edits are television station related, mostly changing ownership or creating stations that don't exsist or affiliations that don't exsist. If I can provide more information for ya, let me know :) Take Care and Have a Great Thursday...NeutralHomer • Talk • October 30, 2008 @ 03:50
Jowey
Re-edited your deletion (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_State_Bar) . Effectiveness of an institution is relevant to describing its function - pro or con. This is not a diatribe as I had others review my post to avoid such a claim, it is relevant to the "effectiveness" of the institution. I see you removed it again, active censorship I request arbitration from an impartial editor, not a censor that does not like facts that are posted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jowey59 (talk • contribs) 23:31, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Fact the Virginia State Bar changed its policy in 2000, fact the Virginia State Bar does not address strategy complaints after 2000. The effectiveness of the institution to provide competent legal counsel was represented pre-2000 in the Canon's that were removed. Facts belong in an encyclopedia - you are a censor not an editor. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jowey59 (talk • contribs) 23:37, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
You are avoiding the facts, identified by referenced links to the Bar and the consequences of the change. As for research, an independent metric is not collected to either support or refute the claims, victims of this process "fall through the cracks" undocumented. I did cite some examples where the policy failed certain individuals and the avoidance by the institution failed their regulatory claim. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jowey59 (talk • contribs) 23:51, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
Got your point, sorry about being terse, the Virginia attorney population brings out the worst. Give them an outline of items, then they dont use it and it is "strategy" - to address their failure to engage/present one gets denial and avoidance. Our attorney deserted in 2000 after five years - why we noticed this "Policy change". Apparently another attorney deserted - http://hamptonroads.com/node/457817 and the Bar has a "task force" I suspect that it is a placebo. This is not your issue, I made one more change - adding titles to the references if that is okay. Thanks again --Jowey59 (talk) 00:51, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
RE: Thanks
Glad I could be of service! According to Interiot's counter, I have now performed 1539 blocks. And I do use archives ... once a year, whether my talk page needs it or not! Thanks again, both for the vote of confidence, and your original RfA co-nomination. --Kralizec! (talk) 13:43, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Regarding this, you may happily note that the once-a-year festivities have taken place, and this has undergone a 278k crash-diet to become this. --Kralizec! (talk) 16:17, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
- The practice ended in the Middle Ages ... ? Perhaps that is what this pervasive smell is ... --Kralizec! (talk) 20:38, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Karis Jagger
A long time ago you closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karis Jagger. Karis Jagger has now been recreated - is it sufficiently different? CorenSearchBot tagged it as copyvio (the site has some revision of the pre-deletion content from Wikipedia), so I think the history should be restored if the current version is ok. – Sadalmelik ☎ 16:56, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Heads Up
Just wanted to give you a heads up that I am off my Wikibreak and when this "donate now" template above works it's way through the system (and it stops slowing things down) I will be back to editing. - NeutralHomer • Talk • November 5, 2008 @ 05:32
- I knocked that little bugger out a couple ago, but it is still goofing some things up. The "menu" on my talk/user pages had to go because it was goofing it up. Oh well. - NeutralHomer • Talk • November 13, 2008 @ 05:58
Hello
NExt time Dont delete my work you just delete my work for no reason I am really angry with you now after i requesting PLEASE dont delete the work
Can you do me a flavour can you undo delete the page If you do I will not get angry with you. that a promise from Aiden2009 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aiden2009 (talk • contribs) 05:33, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
re: Ofira Air Battle
Thanks! It was up for AFD not too long ago, so I thought I'd shower some wikilove on it. Cheers, Nudve (talk) 07:44, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Sorry I missed that
Hello, sorry I missed that line in Ho Chi Minh, while I try to check if I am reverting to a good version, I obviously missed that. LovesMacs (talk) 03:16, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you, you too. LovesMacs (talk) 03:26, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
D&D articles
Hi!
I noticed that you recently deleted a number of talk pages of redirects relating to Dungeons & Dragons using CSD G6 as a reason. Having those pages tagged as part of the D&D project is important to the project, even if the article they are related to never was anything other than a redirect. If you could restore the pages it would be much appreciated. Thank you.
The articles include, but are not limited to, Talk:Horror on the Hill (module), Talk:Patriots of Ulek (module), Talk:Five Shall Be One (module). I can go back and recreate the pages with the tags, but I don't know whether it would be easier for you or me to do it. -Drilnoth (talk) 15:12, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry; some of those were deleted by User:Fuhghettaboutit. However, my request still stands. -Drilnoth (talk) 15:16, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- I was the one who requested the deletion of those pages, so if there's any restoration to be done I suppose I could do it. However, I thought those pages were less-than-useful for reasons I have explained here. I think having these talk pages with project templates on them is not a useful thing to have. --Craw-daddy | T | 15:58, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
Kubigula, I see that you reverted vandalism on this article, which is one of my pet articles (i.e., I've contributed heavily to it and have it on my watchlist). I also see that you are an administrator. Therefore, I am coming to you to request that this article have protection placed on it. As you can see from here, it is heavily vandalized. As a rule, it gets a steady flow of vandalism, but for some reason (perhaps it was the American Thanksgiving holiday that provided too many teenage boys who grew up watching the show too much time on their hands), it's been on the increase for the last week or so. I think that if it had even a temporary protect, it would help the situation. Thanks for your consideration in this manner. --Figureskatingfan (talk) 05:06, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
- Got your note. Appreciate that you've added BC to your watchlist and will keep an eye out. Just this morning, though, I reverted vandalism on it--again. A question, though: just how much vandalism is considered "not quite yet to the level where we normally protect". I'm curious about that, really. Thanks. --Figureskatingfan (talk) 18:45, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
McMaster University
Hello, I did not vandalize the McMaster page. It's blatantly obvious that the rankings are not accurate for 2008 and I have made the changes and cited the document. Why was this reverted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.189.190.101 (talk) 08:43, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Thanks...
...for the Barnstar! It is my first and I appreciate the acknowledgment. ttonyb1 (talk) 06:00, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
Neutralhomer is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaming/MC2008}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
| This is an archive of past discussions with User:Mojo Hand. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 2005 | Archive 2006 | Archive 2007 | Archive 2008 | Archive 2009 | Archive 2010 | → | Archive 2015 |