User talk:Nehrams2020/Archive 8
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Knockedupmp.jpg)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Knockedupmp.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:15, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Moon over Parma bring my love to me tonight
[edit]I can provide pics for season one. moar --TIB (talk) 03:27, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Jimpamoffice bc.jpg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:Jimpamoffice bc.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:18, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
Apology
[edit]On offline form, I accidently vandalised your page whilst trying to obtain a StatusBot. I'm so sorry. MwNNrules (talk) 01:18, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Films March 2008 Newsletter
[edit]The March 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:33, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Thank you... (2)
[edit]...for your kind support of me as a coordinator! I'm glad I've made a positive impression with you, and I assure you the feeling is mutual. I've appreciated your help as an editor and as an admin, and I've enjoyed your work as the newsletter's lead editor. Hope that you have been well! :) —Erik (talk • contrib) - 20:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 14 | 31 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 21:36, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dead silence.jpg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:Dead silence.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
April GA Newsletter
[edit]The April issue of the WikiProject Good Articles Newsletter is now available. Dr. Cash (talk) 03:59, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||
WP:GAN of Funerary art
[edit]Hi Nehrams2020,
Long time no chat. :-) Do you still do WP:GAN reviews, or do you only do sweeps? Would you do a WP:GAN by special request?
Johnbod, Ceoil and I have expended some elbow grease on Funerary art, which I just nommed for GA. I note that there is a closely related nom immediately above ours... but if you have the time and the inclination, I'd be very grateful if you could do a GA review, adding any comments that you feel will help the article forward through the Content Review process... if you can't do it, of course that's OK! ... Thanks! Ling.Nut (talk) 09:37, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- Oh, it looks like Maunus snuck in and did a review unexpectedly! I appreciate his review—just as I appreciate your offer to do one. But it seems like it's already been done... thanks anyhow! Ling.Nut (talk) 06:40, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
Coordinator opening
[edit]Nehrams, first let me thank you for your support of my candidacy. I greatly appreciate your taking the time to vote. As you may be aware, we've had to disqualify Creamy3 due to indefinite blocking of his account, and this leaves us with an open position which the new coordinators will appoint. I know that you were somewhat reluctant to return, but several of us have floated your name for the remaining spot. While this is not an offer yet, I wanted to gauge your thoughts on the matter. Personally, I think that it would provide some extra continuity between the two tranches, and would provide a strong connection to the Outreach-related activities (which we are all very grateful for!). In any case, if you could give it some thought and let me know, I'd be very appreciative. Thanks! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 23:21, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
- Well, consensus seems to be that it's yours if you want it. Let me know, so that I can make the congratulations official. :) Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 23:05, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 7th and 14th, 2008.
[edit]Sorry, it seems that the bot quit before completing its run last week. Here is the last two weeks' worth of Signpost. Ralbot (talk) 08:46, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 15 | 7 April 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 16 | 14 April 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:46, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:AnanthabhadramPoster.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:AnanthabhadramPoster.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Melesse (talk) 12:44, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bee Movie (2007 animated feature film).jpg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:Bee Movie (2007 animated feature film).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:14, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Saving shiloh.jpg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:Saving shiloh.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:18, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:2f32.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:2f32.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
The following images also have this problem:
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --20:59, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Thank you for the warm welcome into WikiProject Films. People at Wikipedia have been nothing but friendly and warm. Magicbullet5 (talk) 17:35, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 17 | 21 April 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:12, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
The lede has been expanded and the rest of your issues have been resolved. Take a look. I will be fixing a few odds and ends such as references.74.61.37.1 (talk) 22:56, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
WT:FILMC discussion
[edit]Your thoughts are requested! (Please bookmark the coordinator talk page if you haven't already, so as to save time messaging.) Thanks, Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 08:20, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Vanwilderriseofthetajposter.jpg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:Vanwilderriseofthetajposter.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:08, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Nehrams2020, can you look over the ongoing debate that is found on the related talk page. I would consider that Erik's suggestion of a time out for both involved editors was a reasonable compromise but both parties seem too attached to the minutiae in the film. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 01:23, 30 April 2008 (UTC).
WikiProject Films April 2008 Newsletter
[edit]The April 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:21, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Good Articles May Newsletter
[edit]The May Newsletter for WikiProject Good Articles has now been published. Dr. Cash (talk) 22:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg)){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
New Project
[edit]Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.
If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 02:25, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
Heard about the big college bust at SDSU
[edit]I heard about the big college bust at San Diego State University yesterday. You OK? Chris (talk) 14:05, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 18 | 2 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 19 | 9 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:13, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sincitypostercast.jpg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:Sincitypostercast.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:05, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Question about the number of images now being removed
[edit]Is there some reason why a number of previously acceptable images are now being challenged and removed? Please see: <Image:Ashanti.jpg> which I had put up on a sandbox page temporarily and was used by User:Limetolime for the article he was working on, The Muppets' Wizard of Oz. Another editor has challenged its status (but has not given a reason) while the other challenges and deletions seem to be coming from bots and admins. Whazzup? FWiW Bzuk (talk) 12:24, 12 May 2008 (UTC). (BTW, it seems that I am just down the street from you. I recently took in the Hilary-Obama speeches at the Alerus Center; quite a show.)
Review Fires on the Plain
[edit]Could you review Fires on the Plain (film)? This is not a review for B class, I'd just like an opinion about it. Me and Dekkapai have worked on it quite a bit. It would be appreciated if you could get to this quickly. Oh, and if you could give me an opinion on my new section in WP:film talk page "Saving Private Ryan - Sniper issue" that would be appreciated as well. I will ask other editors about this as well. Happy editing! Yojimbo501 (talk) 02:01, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks. A couple of questions come to mind quickly: How do you get a fair use rational image? I don't know how to. Do you think the "Awards" section should be a subsection of the "Reception" section? Should the rotten tomatoes thing be taken out? Should "Modern Reviews" be merged with "Reception"? Thats all for questions. I think I know where to get a little more for the "Production" section. Well, Thanks. Me and Dekkapai have worked on it quite a bit and it's always nice to hear that your work is good. Yojimbo501 (talk) 19:09, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I still don't know how to make it proper. Is there any place that will tell me? Yojimbo501 (talk) 20:39, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for everything. But when you say we should keep the rotten Tomatoes thing, do you mean the reviews which are still in? Or the fact that it is 100% fresh with critics? Yojimbo501 (talk) 21:51, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Oh and I might cut some of Jamie S. Rich's stuff. Though, seeing as it is a dvd review, it might have some use in availibilty. Just a thought, though. Yojimbo501 (talk) 21:57, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Just FYI
[edit]I was bold and migrated User:Nehrams2020/Userboxes/Blues_Brothers from the prankster who moved it into his userspace (so the page history could be restored). I hadn't noticed you were an administrator when I started this boldness otherwise I would've just dropped you a note. Anyhow, hope I didn't step on any toes. cheers, xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 15:18, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- No problem. P.S. Fix the cigarette lighter. ;> xenocidic ( talk ¿ review ) 17:14, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks!
[edit]Thanks for the welcome, looking forward to edits! Jepetto (talk) 15:06, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 20 | 12 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:15, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Hello again. The Highly Active Users project has gone through a complete revamping per popular demand. We believe this new format will make it easier for new editors to find assistance. However, with the new format, I must again ask you to verify your information on this page. I attempted to translate the data from the old version to the new, but with the extensive changes, I may have made some errors. Thanks again. Useight (talk) 03:53, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Just want to make certain the last thread does not escape notice. Hope you've been well! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 20:18, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
Hey Nehrams2020
[edit]Thank you for sending me the message for Wikiproject: Films. Should I look on the message board for movies that need editing or what?
--Hippieslayer (talk) 19:38, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Hippieslayer
Hello Nehrams2020
[edit]Hello I was wondering if you could teach me about Wikipedia,. I mean I've been on Wikipedia for almost 3 1/2 years but I still don't know how to transclusion or make a nice userpage or userbox. If you could teach me what you know about Wikipedia then I can use what I'll know to help other's then I can make Wikipedia a better place. If you don't want to I'll understand I just know you from Wikiproject: Films we're not friends like you and Damienhunter --Hippieslayer (talk) 21:56, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Hippieslayer
Hey Nehrams2020
[edit]Yeah could you just move them for morethat would be great, do you need my password. --Hippieslayer (talk) 22:28, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Hippieslayer
Thank You
[edit]Nehrams2020 thank you and could you please tell me how to get the Status Bot on my User and talk pages.And how you transclusion that would help me a lot in wikipedia. --71.86.29.146 (talk) 23:16, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Hippieslayer
Red Rain in Kerala
[edit]There are, as you note, several issues that need to be addressed with the article on the Red Rain In Kerala. One in particular is that the research by Louis and Kumar is severely flawed. This would be apparent to most readers who take the trouble to consult the original papers; unfortunately many do not. The most glaring flaw is that even had a comet containing tens of tons of spores arrived and broken up in the Earth's atmosphere, the 'spores' simply would not have continued to fall over much the same relatively small area of land for a period of six or seven weeks. There are strong and variable winds in the upper atmosphere. This seems to me to be common sense, but the opinion on Wikipedia seems to be that to mention this would be Original Research.
However, to answer some of your points:
"Another theory is that the rain contained mammalian blood, a large flock of bats having been killed at high altitude, perhaps by a meteor"
This seems to have come from one of the early articles in New Scientist. I think it may have been meant to suggest that the authors of the 'spores from space' idea were 'completely batty'. (As I recall, the comment was made by someone at the Open University, but can't be sure without looking up the details.) It is difficult to know how best to modify this so that the meaning becomes clear without compromising the original author.
"Chemical analyses indicate that they consist of organic material, and so they proposed that the particles may be microbes of extraterrestrial origin"
Louis and Kumar find a broadly similar chemical composition to that given in the CESS report, which is a mixture of about 2:1 organics to inorganics. In the absence of any other explanation they conclude that the particles must therefore be spores from space.This is in their papers, already cited.
"Louis and Kumar suggest that [the red rain] was caused by the disintegration of a small comet entering the Earth's atmosphere, and that this comet contained large quantities of the red particles" They did suggest this, despite the critical failure of this hypothesis as mentioned above. It's stated in their papers, already cited.
"This article covers the topic well..." Hmmm. It fails to mention, inter alia, that Chandra Wickramasinghe hosted an astrobiology conference at Cardiff University, attended by Louis and some of the 'leading lights' in the field, such as Milton Wainwright and Gil Levin. Samples of the spores were available at nearby laboratories, and time was given to discussion of the subject. They apparently failed to reach any conclusions; at least none seem to have been announced.
To my mind it still seems overwhelmingly most probable that the red rain was the result of incomplete combustion of chemical waste at the Eloor industrial zone. Though I suppose that this must remain 'original research', I can't see that the article in its present shape is doing anything but a disservice to Wikipedia and its readers. (I'm pleased to note that mention of incomplete incineration is included in the schools version of Wikipedia.)
My question? Given that much of Wikipedia provides useful and generally accurate information, and has administrators with a broad range of understanding, why isn't ir possible to spot more of the articles that are clearly sub-standard? Davy p (talk) 02:03, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
I support the GA status of the article now. Silverchemist (talk) 22:50, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
GA subpage
[edit]Because GA nominations are now on a subpage, there's no way to access it after the bot archives it. I was able to fix the temporary Failed GA template, but when the bot archives it there's no way to go to it again. Can this be fixed? Limetolime talk to me • look what I did! 00:13, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Could you help with Greek (TV show)?
[edit]An editor, Thelegendofvix keeps adding a "Name of show" section in, though many editors, myself included, belive it is unnecesary. Since there are (not that I can tell, anyways) coordinators for Wikiproject TV, and though you are a Wikiproject film editor, could you help in determining weather or not it is due weight? I'm going to ask other editors to. I'm sorry I ask so many questions, hopefully, one day I will no longer be dependant on editors like you. Yojimbo501 (talk) 00:16, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for the quick response. Me and Collectonian have taken care of it. Yojimbo501 (talk) 21:59, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
I have unblocked the above IP (which you blocked for a week for vandalism) following an unblock request. A WHOIS shows it is registered to the University of Auckland. When considering the unblock I took into account a number of past constructive contributions, the fact that it is shared by a large university, and the time served since your block. In my unblock explanation I left a note indicating that further vandalism, even though the IP is shared, will result in further blocks. Please let me know if you have any questions or if you would like to discuss. Thanks! KnightLago (talk) 02:37, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
- No problem. Those are easy to miss. KnightLago (talk) 02:48, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Re: Effects of Isabel in NY and NE
[edit]First, thanks for all of the GA re-reviewing. Unfortunately, there is no single link for that fact. The sources were from a large database, which occassionally changes its links. However, the links are now good for that section. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 01:51, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Great, sounds good. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:47, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Films newsletter
[edit]See my reply. Cbrown1023 talk 02:09, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 19th and 26th, 2008.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 21 | 19 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 22 | 26 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:03, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Films May 2008 Newsletter
[edit]The May 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 20:14, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]Thanks for your note on my user talk page. I have been basically winging it with my articles, mimicking what I see elsewhere, so please feel free to peruse my entries and see if I am doing anything wrong. --Stetsonharry (talk) 21:50, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
hello
[edit]You should review the Sex and the City movie article... I know you want to. After reading your article on Marley and Me, I know you're in touch with your feminine side... ;)
-Andrea —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.190.100.110 (talk) 03:05, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Hello yet again. I regretfully inform you that the bot we were using to update the user status at Wikipedia:Highly Active Users, SoxBot V, was blocked for its constant updating. With this bot out of operation, a patch is in the works. Until that patch is reviewed and accepted by the developers, some options have been presented to use as workarounds: 1) Qui monobook (not available in Internet Explorer); 2) User:Hersfold/StatusTemplate; 3) Manually updating User:StatusBot/Status/USERNAME; or 4) Not worry about it and wait for the patch to go through, which hopefully won't take long. If you have another method, you can use that, too. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Useight (talk) 17:39, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 2, 2008.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 23 | 2 June 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:24, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
Tropical cyclogenesis
[edit]Made most of the changes you've suggested to the tropical cyclogenesis article. Let me know if either you missed anything during your first review, or if I have yet to satisfy a suggestion of yours that I thought I had satisfied. Thegreatdr (talk) 20:40, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Good articles newsletter
[edit]| The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||
Delivered by the automated Giggabot (stop!) 01:58, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
A-class review has moved
[edit]Hello. I have moved the A-class review to a much beter page at Wikipedia:A-class film nominations. Please tell me what you think at my talk page. Thank you. Limetolime Talk to me • look what I did! 17:38, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Those are great ideas. I will move the page to the WP:FILM review page; I hope it'll be better. Also, GREAT idea for the gold/silver/bronze medals, I'd love to get that idea started as soon as possible. Limetolime Talk to me • look what I did! 02:01, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Predator face2.JPG)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Predator face2.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:10, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Americanninja2.jpg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:Americanninja2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:06, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Cyclone
[edit]I've done all the editing I'm going to do with the article tonight...more will be done on the 15th. Comment on the cyclone article talk page about what more is needed for the article to retain GA status. It's already in much better shape, and much closer to GA criteria. Thegreatdr (talk) 03:15, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know. I thought the reassessment was closed by now. I added more detail and addressed his concerns regarding cyclogenesis information. As for additional frontal information, I don't see how that would tie in, even in a supporting way. Thegreatdr (talk) 15:16, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 9, 2008.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 24 | 9 June 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:15, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind.jpg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:Nausicaä of the Valley of the Wind.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:02, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
GA question
[edit]I have a question of curiousity that isn't intended to be accusatory, as I'm sure there's a reason; I just don't know what it is. I'm curious why when doing GA or FA reviews on articles, reviewers sometimes include points such as "please remove the comma from this sentence...[quote]" (as you did for talk:Gettysburg Cyclorama. Why do the reviewers not just save copy/paste time and space and make such a tiny edit themselves? I figure there must be a reason, such I assume wiki editors who have volunteered to review articles have an interest in improving the content. Thanks :) TheHYPO (talk) 23:05, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
I have worked all issues here. Pls advise if GA ok now or if you have more concerns. — Rlevse • Talk • 01:34, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
Re: GA Sweeps Review: Failed
[edit]I wish you hadn't failed that article so soon. I've been fairly busy, but was planning on fixing the issues by this weekend. I guess it's too late now, though. Dr. Cash (talk) 13:44, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
GA Open Review proposal
[edit]Thank you for your contributions to the discussion on GA process reform at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Good articles/Reform. Based on the suggestions made, a proposal has been set out (at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Good articles/Reform#Open review proposal). Your further input would be very welcome, as there are a number of areas that may need more discussion before this proposal is put to the wider community. All the best, EyeSerenetalk 10:27, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Re: GA
[edit]I'll look at the changes right now and thank you for noticing my work on Matt Damon's article, if you'd like to help me to get it to FA status, that would be great. If you have the time though. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 16:54, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
- You are quite welcome, the article reads well and its GA material. ;) Well, I'm a little busy with other articles, so I won't get to Matt Damon's article 'til I'm done with those tasks. But, I will let you know if I nominate it to FA. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 19:01, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
Icelanders
[edit]This might take me slightly longer than seven days. Unless all goes quiet for >1 week, would you be able to hold off failing this? Regards, Daniel (talk) 01:55, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Royal Canadian Air Cadets article
[edit]I made changes per your suggestions. Please have a look so I can make any further revisions before the deadline CU L8R AV8R ... J-P (talk) 14:45, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
I initially found it strange that you decided to review this article, because I had already reviewed it in the last October. However I noticed that it was listed in two sections: in 'Culture and society/Cultural and social studies' and in 'Law/Crime, criminals, punishment and victims'. So it is necessary now to decide where this article belongs to. Ruslik (talk) 10:06, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
The article has been already removed from 'Culture and society/Cultural and social studies', so it is not necessary to decide anything (I look into the old version of the list, where it was indeed in two sections). Ruslik (talk) 10:09, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Hezbollah
[edit]Hi, We've done most of the issues which you mentioned. But, you make the article active again. So please wait one week more and let's solve some of the problems which have been mentioned and discussed.--Seyyed(t-c) 04:08, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- Hi, we tried to improve the article. Please check it again. Thanks.--Seyyed(t-c) 01:50, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Jew GA
[edit]Thanks for letting me know. Jayjg (talk) 02:30, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 23 and 26, 2008.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 25 | 23 June 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 26 | 26 June 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 07:49, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
GA review: Community
[edit]Thanks for your note. I hadn't been keeping a close eye on the article and find that some material (e.g., Scott Peck) was added without the benefit of citations. The addition seems appropriate, so I will track down the references. An extension would be great. Sunray (talk) 16:04, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks!
[edit]Hello Nehrams2020! Thank you very much for the barnstar. Besides knowing you as one of the WP:FILMS coordinators, I faintly remembered that you were involved in reviewing one of my GA nominations. Been a while since then! I hope to continue working of these film articles into GAs. Thanks once again! Best regards, Mspraveen (talk) 11:48, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Howling II poster.jpg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:Howling II poster.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphan cat on user page.
[edit]Erm were you using a bot or some sort of automation for this diff. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ABobTheTomato&diff=222970050&oldid=216244137 If you were I thought I should point out problem that it added Orphan and Uncategorised tags to the Users talk page! -Hunting dog (talk) 07:07, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Added ref
[edit]See Talk:Boy_Scouting_(Boy_Scouts_of_America)#GA_Sweeps_Review:_On_Hold. Have added last ref. I think this can be wrapped up now. — Rlevse • Talk • 13:03, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Arvanites
[edit]Hello! Apart from the points you noted, I believe that the article lacks in neutrality in many points. - Sthenel (talk) 13:54, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for June 30, 2008.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 27 | 30 June 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 03:47, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi Nehrams
[edit]Deeply appreciated your message. Thing are now very different for me. I moved to Athens, live at my parents' house temporarily and have to rethink the whole setup of my life. I don't forget our great cooperation and feel somewhat sad I can't keep on being useful on your side. Oh, well. Best wishes. Hoverfish Talk 14:31, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
GA - fair trade
[edit]Hello Nehrams2020, Thanks for your assessment of the article fair trade - the issues you pointed out definitely need to be fixed and since I wrote a large part of the article, I understand it is probably my duty to do so. Unfortunately, due to professional reasons, I will be unable to spend much time on Wikipedia in the next month or so... I guess I will resubmit the article for GA review when I do have time to address them sometime in August. Thanks though Vincentl (talk) 23:31, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Wonder Woman
[edit]Hello, I was wondering if I could make a request of you regarding admin tools. There was a live-action film under development for Wonder Woman, and an article was started at Wonder Woman (film). It was eventually redirected to the superheroine's article. Now the redirect has been resurrected as a Wonder Woman animated film, still containing the page history of the live-action film article. (There is a similar combination of revisions on Talk:Wonder Woman (film), where we had some discussion.) I was wondering if you could move all pre-March 27, 2008 revisions on the mainspace to Wonder Woman (2009 film) and all pre-June 23, 2008 revisions on the talkspace to Talk:Wonder Woman (2009 film). I would then treat the 2009-marked articles as redirects to the superheroine's article like before. The animated film, being certain to come out, will have "ownership" of Wonder Woman (film) for the time being, since we cannot be sure there will be a live-action film in production down the road. If there is one, then the revisions would already be separated per GFDL standards and grow separately. I tried to make this request of Gwen Gale, but she did not seem to want to do so. I don't think it's that controversial of a move; per naming conventions and WP:NFF, there is technically no other film besides the animated Wonder Woman film being made, and I'm just using (2009 film) as a placeholder (per IMDb). Would you be able to split the page history like this? —Erik (talk • contrib) - 12:29, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
- Hey, it seems OK now. I think we need to adjust the talk pages next. There is Talk:Wonder Woman (film)/Archive 1 that could be moved to Talk:Wonder Woman (2009 film)/Archive 1. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 21:09, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
- I think that the former can be moved to the latter. However, it is just a copy-and-paste archive. On Talk:Wonder Woman (film), you could move pre-June 23, 2008 revisions to Talk:Wonder Woman (2009 film). Hope you're not struggling too much with this! —Erik (talk • contrib) - 21:20, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Thank you very much! It looks like everything is in order. If the years or the titles change for either film, they can be readjusted separately. Appreciate you taking the time to do this! —Erik (talk • contrib) - 21:35, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
As you may know, the StatusBot responsible for maintaining the status of the Highly Active Users was taken offline. We now have a replacement in the Qui status system. This semi-automatic system will allow you to easily update your status page found at Special:Mypage/Status which the HAU page code is now designed to read from. If you are already using Qui (or a compatible) system - great! - no action is needed (other than remembering to update your status as necessary). If not, consider installing Qui. You can also manually update this status by changing the page text to online, offline, or busy. While it is not mandatory, the nature of HAU is that people are often seeking a quick answer from someone who is online and keeping our statuses up-to-date will assist with this. Note if you were previously using your /Status page as something other than a one-word status indicator, your HAU entry may have been set to "status=n" to correct display issues. Please clear this parameter if you change things to be "HAU compatible". Further questions can be raised at WT:HAU. This message was delivered by xenobot 22:41, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
I think we've got all the bullet points taken care of now, except for the lead; hopefully a good lead writer (and that ain't me) can help out there. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 04:58, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 7, 2008.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 28 | 7 July 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:06, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Samuel L. Jackson
[edit]There is two pictures see [1] and this. One of this should be deleted. Don't you think so?. --SkyWalker (talk) 17:32, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
![[1]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Samuelljackson2.jpg){kind=link}
Iluzija
[edit]Thank you for your review of Iluzija. I've made edits based on your recommendations and responded to your review on the article's talk page. --DanDs (talk) 06:00, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
It may not be a barnstar...
[edit]
...but perhaps it should be. Thank you for the barnstar and recognizing my efforts within the meteorology and tropical cyclone projects. Thegreatdr (talk) 06:18, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Incidentally, I do intend to sift through the images I've uploaded and resolve such issues. I'll admit to having been ignorant of the 300px rule specified in MOS:FILM, and my rationales could do to be stronger too. A job for the weekend, it seems. Regards. PC78 (talk) 04:19, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
- Cheers! I've already done this one, so you can nuke the old version if you want. Regards. PC78 (talk) 11:22, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
Little Miss Sunshine
[edit]I have just offered my comments at A-Class review, which I hope you find of use. Regards. PC78 (talk) 15:32, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
WP:FILMS Welcome
[edit]Hello Nehrams2020. Thank you for welcoming me. Regards, Masterpiece2000 (talk) 15:40, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
William Conkey
[edit]If you get a minute, can you take a look at this page. It has a lot of content but the formatting is all wrong. I put some comments about it in the article's talk page. -D --198.151.13.10 (talk) 15:35, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Upcoming newsletter
[edit]Hello, I was wondering if it would be permissible to mention a couple of discussions in the upcoming newsletter. I wanted to mention the new "Release" section (under which there are "Theatrical" and "Home media" sections) and the new "Critical reception" section that have been implemented in MOS:FILM. I also wanted to see if the discussion about non-free images (at WT:MOSFILM#Non-free images) could also be mentioned since this is something that would probably affect the WikiProjec on a larger scale. Is this doable by whatever standards you may have with the newsletter? :) Please let me know! —Erik (talk • contrib) - 16:44, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- Awesome! You're the first person I know to have gone to Comic-Con. Is it easy to get access? I heard great things about Wolfman, though I'm holding my breath a little about The Spirit. Was the screening related to Comic-Con or just a separate deal? No wonder I've seen you editing the film's article! :) —Erik (talk • contrib) - 22:14, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- Don't worry, you're not getting back to me late! It was a pretty average response time, actually. :) It's really cool that you got to see all these stars and all these panels. Pictures would be great additions to the respective articles. If you ever desire to work on The Spirit, let me know... I really haven't updated the article in a while, and I know that I have a ton of Google Alerts for the film. (Not to mention that the always-useful Comics2Film will have an archive of links, too!) What did you think of Death Race and Hamlet 2, anyway? I've heard that the latter is supposed to be really funny (Rock Me Sexy Jesus?) while Death Race is typical Paul W.S. Anderson. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 11:54, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- I definitely get them weekly... I have a little too many to handle daily. I used to have them be sent to my primary Gmail account, but it was too overwhelming. I've since shifted them to an alternative Gmail account solely for receiving film headlines. I try to set up the keywords like "tropic thunder" "ben stiller" and choose "News" instead of "Web" or "Both". It does seem that Google Alerts doesn't deliver everything, though... have you noticed that? —Erik (talk • contrib) - 20:25, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
- Don't worry, you're not getting back to me late! It was a pretty average response time, actually. :) It's really cool that you got to see all these stars and all these panels. Pictures would be great additions to the respective articles. If you ever desire to work on The Spirit, let me know... I really haven't updated the article in a while, and I know that I have a ton of Google Alerts for the film. (Not to mention that the always-useful Comics2Film will have an archive of links, too!) What did you think of Death Race and Hamlet 2, anyway? I've heard that the latter is supposed to be really funny (Rock Me Sexy Jesus?) while Death Race is typical Paul W.S. Anderson. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 11:54, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
I wrote a blurb about the ongoing activity with the guidelines; you can find it at User:Erik/Sandbox#Newsletter bit. Feel free to implement this into the newsletter with whatever changes you think are necessary! —Erik (talk • contrib) - 22:36, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for July 14 and 21, 2008.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 29 | 14 July 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
| From the editor: Transparency | ||
| WikiWorld: "Goregrind" | Dispatches: Interview with botmaster Rick Block | |
| Features and admins | Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News | |
| The Report on Lengthy Litigation | ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 30 | 21 July 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 05:56, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism Tags
[edit]Hey, I took a look at what you said about my IP being flagged for vandalism. If you look at the header you'll see it's because we run through a proxy at work. I haven't actually edited any of the articles they're talking about. -D --76.122.153.196 (talk) 23:23, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kill bill vol one ver.jpg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:Kill bill vol one ver.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:03, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kill bill vol two ver.jpg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:Kill bill vol two ver.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Drew Carey TheSims.jpg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:Drew Carey TheSims.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Films newsletter
[edit]Good to go out now? Cbrown1023 talk 00:50, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
GA mentorship
[edit]Hi. I'm going to be reviewing this article for GA, and since I'm new, I went to the mentor list and I noticed you had lots of TV/Film etc. GAs, so I'm going to ask you at the end of the process for an opinion. Just a heads up. Pie is good (Apple is the best) 01:56, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Films July 2008 Newsletter
[edit]The July 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:29, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
I have made substantial additions to the above article, and have the following to ask of you:
- How does one go about finding web archives of the articles which no longer exist to replace dead links?
- What did you mean by "update all of the access dates"? Do you mean that we should put more recent dates for working links?
- Could you go over the article as it is now and review it per GA criteria?
Thanks, Ohconfucius (talk) 07:36, 1 August 2008 (UTC)