User talk:Leonstojka

Welcome!

Hello, Leonstojka, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Ipigott (talk) 08:44, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Leonstojka, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Leonstojka! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to join Women in Red

Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota.
We think you might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap.
You can join by using the box at the top of the WiR page. But if you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.63% of English Wikipedia's biographies).

Our priorities for May:

Women of the Sea Villains Women in Sport Central Eastern European women #1day1woman Global Initiative

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 08:43, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Xana Antunes

Hello Leonstojka,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Xana Antunes for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

TheLongTone (talk) 14:18, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Louisa Reeve, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Helen Glover (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Aloneinthewild (talk) 01:14, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alastair Haggart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fort William (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Durham University

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Durham University you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chidgk1 -- Chidgk1 (talk) 13:20, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Durham University

The article Durham University you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Durham University for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chidgk1 -- Chidgk1 (talk) 20:20, 9 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Morris Rodham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PGCE (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Durham University

The article Durham University you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Durham University for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Chidgk1 -- Chidgk1 (talk) 19:21, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Leonstojka. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tracy Philipps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Bell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Graham Hancock

See Talk:Graham_Hancock#Hancock's_middle_name--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 06:08, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Basil Charles King, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arran (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Simon Hope Broadbent

Hello, Leonstojka,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username UnitedStatesian and it's nice to meet you:-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Simon Hope Broadbent, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept, either in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. At any case, please consider improving the page to address the issues raised or it may be deleted later anyway.

If you have any questions, leave a comment here and ping me.

UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:34, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Simon Hope Broadbent for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Simon Hope Broadbent is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simon Hope Broadbent until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:17, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Richard Burge

Hello, Leonstojka,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Richard Burge should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Burge .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 17:24, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Alexandra Hall Hall, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Gaia Octavia Agrippa ^Talk 01:07, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomas Blackburn.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:09, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Kingsley Dunham.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kingsley Dunham.jpg, which you've attributed to https://artuk.org/discover/artworks/sir-kingsley-dunham-19102001-47759# = © All rights reserved. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 02:03, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Hugo Shorter

Hello, Leonstojka,

Thanks for creating Hugo Shorter! I edit here too, under the username Slatersteven and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Needs a hell of a lot of work, more citations and a lot more detail.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slatersteven}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Slatersteven (talk) 14:14, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Graham Brady, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Audit Office (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:George auckland.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:George auckland.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Whpq (talk) 17:11, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C BY-NC 2.0 is not public domain, nor is it sufficiently free for Wikipedia. -- Whpq (talk) 17:12, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Alexander Frater.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Alexander Frater.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:15, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Margaret, Viscountess Dillon.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Margaret, Viscountess Dillon.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Whpq (talk) 17:16, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image licensing

Hi,

You've uploaded many images with a stated license of "Public Domain because..." and then giving some other license such as a Creative Commons license, or Open Government License. These are not public domain. Some of the license information has been corrected, and the images retained because the licence is acceptable for use on Wikipedia. Others have been or will be deleted because the licensing is not compatible with Wikipedia such as non-commercial restrictions. Please take care to use the correct license. If you are unsure or do not know, you can ask for help at Media Copyright Questions. Please do not upload more files until you understand the licensing. Thank you. -- Whpq (talk) 17:47, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Bruce Bucknell India.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Bruce Bucknell India.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Whpq (talk) 17:48, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Ian Marchant.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Ian Marchant.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Whpq (talk) 17:48, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Hatfield Coll Chapel.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hatfield Coll Chapel.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:30, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dick Franks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Security Service (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:39, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edward Shortt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Island of Lost Souls (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:08, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Ernest Raymond

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from elsewhere. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, some content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:30, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tracy Philipps, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages BA and Hillington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:07, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Richard Paniguian, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages New York and The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:32, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Durham MCCU cricketers

Hi Leonstojka. I've noticed you've added cricketers to this category who haven't played first-class cricket for Durham MCCU. This category (formerly erroneously called Category:Durham University cricketers) is only for cricketers who have played first-class cricket for Durham UCCE/MCCU since 2001. As Durham University Cricket Club isn't afforded first-class status, we tend not to categorise players by cricket teams who have not played at the highest domestic level. And as of next year Durham MCCU will lose first-class status, all because of a swear word in English cricket called The Hundred!!! Cheers! StickyWicket (talk) 21:08, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tracy Philipps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cover story (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:24, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hatfield Coll Chapel.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hatfield Coll Chapel.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:53, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Portrait of Henry Villiers Stuart.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Portrait of Henry Villiers Stuart.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Whpq (talk) 13:01, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited International Union for Conservation of Nature, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inger Andersen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:18, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tracy Philipps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Order of Leopold (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:13, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Morris Gelsthorpe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Licentiate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Painter Hughie O'Donoghue.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Painter Hughie O'Donoghue.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 17:46, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Painter Hughie O'Donoghue.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Painter Hughie O'Donoghue.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Whpq (talk) 18:43, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Richard Blundell Comins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page South Pacific (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:14, 11 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:John Rawling Todd, Chagos.jpg

The file File:John Rawling Todd, Chagos.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Probable copyright violation, available online prior to upload here and in a book published in 2011 https://www.latimes.com/world/africa/la-fg-britain-us-diego-garcia-20180814-story.html https://www.huffpost.com/entry/a-double-standard-on-democracy-us-and-uk-must_b_5776b07de4b0746f5647e4ee https://books.google.com/books?id=3ankJb0skpwC&pg=PA109

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 06:52, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alan Schom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hero worship (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:28, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of social activities at Durham University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jonathan Edwards (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:18, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relevant discussion on WT:HED

A discussion which may be relevant to you is currently taking place on WT:HED (section) on the wider picture of WP:BOOSTERISM across university articles. Please see the relevant section if you wish to contribute, as any consensus made there may end up impacting articles on topics you have contributed to (Univ. Dunelm.), and it would be sensible to get involved earlier rather than going through any discussion it again if it affects those pages. Your views and input would be most welcome! Shadowssettle_(talk) 16:56, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Clan Oliphant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wellington College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of category from Benjamin Quartey-Papafio

Hi, I notice you recently removed the category Category:Alumni of Durham University from Benjamin Quartey-Papafio. You seem to be doing a bunch of category clean-up, and I wondered why you've removed this category from this page. Dsp13 (talk) 18:07, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I removed it because I felt the subcategory 'Fourah Bay College Alumni' was sufficient (FB being an overseas campus of Durham Uni at the time he was alive) and I could not find any suggestion that Quartey-Papafio had actually studied in Durham itself. The resources I am using for these cleanups are the Durham University Gazettes and Calendars (which can be searched through at this link). In fact I am not totally certain he even matriculated/graduated from Fourah Bay, I can see a 'Benjamin Percy Quartey-Papafio' in the 1914/15 calendar who is listed as having begun there in Easter of 1911, which is obviously too late for our subject, and an 'Arthur Boye Quartey Papafio' in the 1892 calendar. --Leonstojka (talk) 18:52, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, I had no idea that Fourah Bay was an overseas campus of Durham. Fascinating, and thanks for the explanation. My source for his education was the Pen Pictures, which I borrowed from a library and unfortunately don't have to hand. Dsp13 (talk) 20:23, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hugh van Cutsem, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Page boy and The Telegraph.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Durham University Alumni Ed Lopez

I noticed you recently removed the category Category:Alumni of Durham University from Ed Lopez (a second time). As Cambridge alumni, I know that the collegiate system in the UK can be confusing: the subject here is an alumni of both Durham University and Ustinov College. As long as there's an "Alumni of Durham University" category, members of each college at the University should be listed as alumni of both their college and the broader University. An argument could be made that only colleges should be listed - but that should summon a case against the broader Durham University alumni list on Wikipedia, not exclusion of the category on articles about alumni from the University - as long as the category exists. I don't think that would be a good idea though: "The central goal of the category system is to provide navigational links to Wikipedia pages in a hierarchy of categories which readers, knowing essential—defining—characteristics of a topic, can browse and quickly find sets of pages on topics that are defined by those characteristics." It doesn't seem necessary to narrow navigational links to any page when the resources for this are available. Students at these universities graduate from the university. In this case, the subject serves on the US alumni board for Durham University. Grant18650602 (talk) 04:58, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Former members of The Durham Revue has been nominated for discussion

Category:Former members of The Durham Revue has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Place Clichy (talk) 10:53, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Your edit to Durham University Department of Physics has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 21:34, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tracy Philipps

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Tracy Philipps you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kaiser matias -- Kaiser matias (talk) 17:40, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tracy Philipps

The article Tracy Philipps you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Tracy Philipps for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kaiser matias -- Kaiser matias (talk) 03:20, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tracy Philipps, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ministry of Information.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Tracy Philipps

The article Tracy Philipps you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tracy Philipps for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kaiser matias -- Kaiser matias (talk) 02:22, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hatfield College, Durham

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hatfield College, Durham you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bait30 -- Bait30 (talk) 03:01, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hatfield College, Durham

The article Hatfield College, Durham you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Hatfield College, Durham for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Bait30 -- Bait30 (talk) 06:02, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Durham University people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Wharton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Durham University people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Press and Journal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Your edit to Tracy Philipps has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 17:20, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hatfield College, Durham

The article Hatfield College, Durham you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Hatfield College, Durham for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 03:20, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Hatfield College Formal.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Hatfield College Formal.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Portrait of James Barber, 1985.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Portrait of James Barber, 1985.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hatfield College, Durham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lioness.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Hatfield College, Durham

The article Hatfield College, Durham you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hatfield College, Durham for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Etriusus -- Etriusus (talk) 15:01, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For excellent work making Hatfield College, Durham into a good article, making this the first (or amongst the first) Durham College to get GA status. Rob (talk) 15:55, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sir John Ramsden, 9th Baronet for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sir John Ramsden, 9th Baronet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sir John Ramsden, 9th Baronet until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Pilaz (talk) 16:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Spaul for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Spaul, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Spaul until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Tony Giffard, 3rd Earl of Halsbury, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 18:26, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Woodcote House School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Woodcote House School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Woodcote House School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:36, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ivy Thomas Memorial School

Hello, Leonstojka,

Thank you for creating Ivy Thomas Memorial School.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

You need at least 3 in-depth sources from independent, reliable sources to show notability. Right now you have 1.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:37, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Hello, I'm Dormskirk. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Anthony Rimington, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 10:59, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Donaldo Ross, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 12:37, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Leonard Crossley moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Leonard Crossley, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:36, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hugo Shorter for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hugo Shorter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hugo Shorter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uhooep (talk) 19:12, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chris Rampling for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Rampling is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Rampling until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uhooep (talk) 19:31, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sam Thomas (diplomat) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sam Thomas (diplomat) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Thomas (diplomat) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uhooep (talk) 19:36, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bruce Bucknell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bruce Bucknell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Bucknell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uhooep (talk) 09:43, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Matt Field for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Matt Field is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Field until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uhooep (talk) 11:54, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michael Davenport (diplomat) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Davenport (diplomat) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Davenport (diplomat) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uhooep (talk) 14:09, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tim Cole (diplomat) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tim Cole (diplomat) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Cole (diplomat) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uhooep (talk) 12:09, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Cartoon of boats on the river wear, durham.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Cartoon of boats on the river wear, durham.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. — Ирука¹³ 03:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of alumni of University College, Durham moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of alumni of University College, Durham. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 17:47, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Angela Mihai

Hello, I'm David Eppstein. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Angela Mihai, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! —David Eppstein (talk) 20:16, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of alumni of University College, Durham has been accepted

List of alumni of University College, Durham, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 02:44, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Denny Draper moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Denny Draper. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 21:47, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Denny Draper (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Xoak was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A promising young player. Unfortunately, hasn't received much media coverage, at least no in-depth independent coverage, for now. Could be WP:TOOSOON.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Denny Draper and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

X (talk) 22:11, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Denny Draper for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Denny Draper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Denny Draper until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AlexandraAVX (talk) 16:25, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Carlos Deus

Hello Leonstojka, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Carlos Deus, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carlos Deus.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cabrils}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Cabrils (talk) 05:54, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]