User talk:Z22

Speedy deletion of New Jersey Ballet

A tag has been placed on New Jersey Ballet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. bd_ (talk) 06:22, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Formatting references

If you want the references to show up at the bottom of the page, you have to use not only the reference tags, but also use either the <references/> or the {{Reflist}} tags.

There is a tutorial on how to use references at Wikipedia:Citing sources. I hope this helps. --Eastlaw (talk) 23:06, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. A number of your changes appear to serve little purpose than to promote a specific institution rather than discuss the topic on the individual articles.Novangelis (talk) 22:42, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SaintBarnabasMedicalCenter logo small.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SaintBarnabasMedicalCenter logo small.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:57, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Shiva Ayyadurai for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shiva Ayyadurai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shiva Ayyadurai until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article..

Hello

Are you watching the Chelsea game right now? Its a real cracker. User:Helloeggs 22:07, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Sixth and a Half Avenue

At this time "Sixth and a Half Avenue" is simply a nickname for a short mid-block pedestrian mall. It is not the actual name of an actual avenue, so please do not add it to any other articles as a "crossing" for east-west streets. Beyond My Ken (talk) 07:14, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your concern and your interpretation. It is a named street by city officials, regardless of how strange that is. Please use article's talk page to discuss more. Z22 (talk) 19:10, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Can you please provide a citTION for where the pedestrian corridor is carried on the city's rolls as "Sixth and a Half Avenue"? Not, that is, a city officially referring to it as such informally, but something official. Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:30, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Okay, continuing discussion on the article's talk page. Please watch that page to help improve the article. Thanks a lot. Z22 (talk) 02:35, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Z22. You have new messages at Talk:Sixth and a Half Avenue (Manhattan).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks, and apologies, Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:21, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

High-speed rail in the United States (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to New York Department of Transportation

New York high-speed rail (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to New York Department of Transportation

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

This ones for the Medicinr Chest who was a goo article... Keep it up!!! Ajayupai95 (talk) 05:51, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

First time to get this. Not sure how to respond :-) Z22 (talk) 05:54, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Not got one of these either? :P. Z22, in response to your authorship of interesting articles like the Westinghouse Lamp Plant page, I award you the Tireless Contributor Barnstar, which "is awarded to especially tireless editors who contribute an especially large body of work without sacrificing quality". Keep up the great work! Ironholds (talk) 23:57, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar. It is the first for these too. Z22 (talk) 03:36, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wall Street West, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Watershed (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:32, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, DPL bot. I've fixed the problem. Z22 (talk) 22:37, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

high-speed rail dispute

Hi, I was trying to get other users to buy in to abiding by an WP:RFC before posting it, do you think that's a waste of time and I should just go ahead? Imho we have two competing sources for the distance between those two stations, Railway Gazette on one hand and Google Maps on the other. AadaamS (talk) 19:21, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

AadaamS, If the RFC process does not require us to seek an agreement to abide by the outcome prior to the start of the process, then we should not waste time trying to convince the parties in dispute first. I think the best thing for us is to simply follow the process, whatever that is. As I am reading it now, it appears that we should try to work out on the talk page first, which we did but didn't go anywhere. Next is to try WP:3O. However, this is not applicable to disputes with more than two editors. It appears that this issue already involves more than two editors. The next step is to start RFC. It will be great if you can start the process as you seem to be better at articulating the issue on dispute in a neutral way. Let me know I can help further on this. Z22 (talk) 20:38, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Yes there is no requirement to have everybody agree before posting it. I went ahead and posted the WP:RFC so hopefully we can be done with this edit war soon. I think after the RFC that everyone will be required to abide by the RFC whether they want to or not or be blocked. Thanks for your input and especially that you went and independently verified the the distance using google maps. The outcome will be interesting. The last time I posted an RfC I gained a lot of insight in how Wikipedia works from an experienced contributor. AadaamS (talk) 22:06, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello Z22. Thank you very much for your support, with Aadaams, about this "edit war", and for the consensus you try hard to obtain.

It seams that, at last, a consensus has been accepted by my opponents. Their sentence now has no more sense and relationship with its chapter, but maybe are they happy with that.

Unfortunately, the same guy decided now to attack the "Land speed record" article, I entirely remade two years ago...

Best regards. --FlyAkwa (talk) 10:32, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Conduit hydroelectricity, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aqueduct (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

The Barnstar of Integrity!

		The Barnstar of Integrity
		tirelessly you go into the dispute at Land speed record for rail vehicles just as the smoke has cleared over at High-speed rail and yet again you stay out of the personal attacks and stick to finding and debating sources. Your conduct in disputes is an inspiration to other editors! AadaamS (talk) 06:36, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your kind words, AadaamS. I just wanted to help all of us to get back on track again, no pun intended. Z22 (talk) 14:15, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:US federal government shutdown notice by Statue Cruise.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:US federal government shutdown notice by Statue Cruise.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 08:39, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification, Stefan2. I have uploaded another image to Commons with CC license which does not use the "fair-use" rationale. I changed the article to replace this non-free image with the one I just uploaded to Commons. At this poit, no other article uses this non-free media file and it should be removed. Thanks. Z22 (talk) 14:02, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Commons

Please take a look at my note at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Z22#My_talk_page

. . Jim - Jameslwoodward (talk to me • contribs) 14:00, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

High Speed Raik in Germany

Please be careful with your edits. Germany still has conventional InterCity Services as per their own website (http://www.bahn.com/i/view/USA/en/trains/overview/ecic.shtml). - Bhtpbank (talk) 09:58, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for you input, Bhtpbank. According to that web page, it says, "Faster than regional trains, IC and EC trains connect major cities, reaching speeds of 200 km/h." Based on this web page alone, all IC services are at higher-speed rail range. Maybe you can point out to the specific page that talks about some of their IC services that are running at conventional speeds. I do not live in Germany so I may be missing some concepts here. If you referred to the lower speeds regional trains which are also listed on their web page (http://www.bahn.com/i/view/USA/en/trains/overview/regional_and_urban_trains.shtml): Regional-Express, Regionalbahn and S-Bahn. Those are regional rail which are not strictly inter-city rail we are talking about. We can discuss more in the higher-speed rail talk page so we can share our thoughts with other editors. Thanks again. Z22 (talk) 05:34, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brayton Point Power Station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mercury (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. That's now fixed. Z22 (talk) 14:20, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

--

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

DYK for Boro taxi

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:32, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Boro taxi's DYK hook was among the most creative I've seen on Wikipedia. Thanks for the interesting article and for your work so far! Keep it up, and make sure to pat someone on their back today as well! Happy holidays! ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 06:19, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar. Also we should thank to User:Maile66 who came up with that hook. It was just for fun but it turned out to be better than any of the proposed hooks. Z22 (talk) 16:06, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alternator, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armature (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Fixed. Thanks. Z22 (talk) 13:28, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Non-road engine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regulator (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Fixed. Thanks again for your help. Z22 (talk) 13:31, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Space selfie

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Curiosity rover's first space selfie post.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Curiosity rover's first space selfie post.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:53, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for your thought on this, Crisco 1492. I have edited the article to use a reference instead of using this non-free image. Z22 (talk) 18:18, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK

Wonder if you'd review Template:Did you know nominations/Mass Transit Super Bowl as it would be nice to try to get it up before February 2? thanks Djflem (talk) 09:02, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Martian regolith simulant‎

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:12, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Derrick, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crane. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Heritage Middle School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Livingston High School. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Cotton

Thank you for some useful high quality images- and for some useful US input. Your images betray that you have visited Lowell and Boott Mill- the articles really could do with a little tlc (tender loving care) I have been working with GLAM on Queen Street Mill and Helmshore, and a lot of other mills eg Quarry Bank Mill but have no access to any US material to help out with Boott Mills. Do you fancy the challenge? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ClemRutter (talk • contribs) 22:08, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Well, ClemRutter, I couldn't hide the fact that I recently visited Lowell. I visited Boott Mills and Wannalancit Mills, both of which need some love. I don't know if I can contribute much in term of writing because cotton is not really one of my areas. At the very least, I can contribute photos and videos?? Also, I happen to like to go to some unusual or local museums. If that is covered by GLAM, I can continue to contribute more photos in the future. Okay, for the Boott and Wannalancit, how should I start? Z22 (talk) 23:47, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

As you can see, when I have the trust of the museum I blitz the place see Queen Street Mill or Michelin Adventure. My shots usually contain a four digit number. Go for it.

Queen Street Mill is also a mill that has become a textile museum- so could become a good model for Bootts Mills. I see that we have to give a detailed description of the location written to inform a visitor from another continent. This will often involve a bit of cut and paste from other WP articles- eventually someone will accuse us of repetition but it is easy to edit down the text inf required. The history section will concentrate on the economic history/ refering to external events and tech. improvements. We now describe the architecture of the mill: often this can be found in government appraisal documents, and in some cases this is the main feature of the article. I enjoy the bit about the steam-engine (or water wheel technology)- then we can do the looms and other machines and the type of cloth or stuff they wove. Here we can talk about Draper looms, the Northrop turret and Jacquard heads...

And after all this we can describe the building current usages as a museum- and the specific items in the collection. WP brief is to inform the educated individual- but we cannot assume that they are Anglophones or have any background knowledge. Unfortunately I am going to have intermittent broadband access over then next few weeks. But we ought to be able to make a few significant changes.-- Clem Rutter (talk) 20:32, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Strati (automobile)

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:02, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Great article! Thanks for starting. If you have an interest in 3D printing in general, you might check out 3dprinting.wiki. Keep up the great work! ----Another Believer _(Talk) 17:57, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 13 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Road surface page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:55, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, Ref'Bot for leaving a note. I fixed that problem now. Z22 (talk) 02:02, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Higher-speed rail

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Higher-speed rail you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MusikAnimal -- MusikAnimal (talk) 23:22, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Higher-speed rail

The article Higher-speed rail you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Higher-speed rail for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MusikAnimal -- MusikAnimal (talk) 01:22, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Higher-speed rail

The article Higher-speed rail you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Higher-speed rail for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MusikAnimal -- MusikAnimal (talk) 06:42, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Higher-speed rail

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:54, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Ebola isolation tent at University Hospital in Newark, New Jersey.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ebola isolation tent at University Hospital in Newark, New Jersey.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:00, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification. This has been resolved as a keep. Z22 (talk) 12:15, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

References

We at Wikipedia love evidence-based medicine. Please cite high-quality reliable sources. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. A list of resources to help edit such articles can be found here. The edit box has a build in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. WP:MEDHOW walks through editing step by step. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:16, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

@Doc James: Is this paper reliable enough? Can we restore the content with this reference added to it? Z22 (talk) 05:28, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Not pubmed indexed and not a review article. Not a good source. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 05:30, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

COI notice

Hi Z22

Based on your edits to Traumatic brain injury and the image you uploaded, it appears to me that you may have a COI with regard to eye-tracking. Hence this notice...

Hello, Z22. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

Would youo please explain what relationship you have, if any, with that subject matter? Thank you Jytdog (talk) 04:25, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

@Jytdog: No, I have no relationship or COI to the eye-tracking devices. I just happen to travel to some unusual places and took photos of many devices or things that people would not normally take. My goal is to enhance Wikipedia by adding meaningful visual coverage to articles which would help readers (especially for those visual learners) to understand the subjects better. Eye-tracking device is just happen to be one of them. Please explain why you think that I have COI on this subject. Please also see my past contributions to know that I edited articles in many areas. Recently, I concentrated on equipment and devices. I have more to add for the coming days so please don't treat those as COI. I have been an editor for quite sometime now to know that I need to refrain from editing any articles that might have COI. Please let me know if you still have any concerns.

By the way, anytime I add images, I always try to find references out there, with as much as reliable sources as possible, to be used as inline citations for my images. The link that you removed, although it was a primary source, it is reliable to indicate that the image is actually that device and the components are correct as said in the caption. I don't want other readers to just trust me that I upload the right images. This is my best effort to follow WP:V even for images. Without the citations, how can other editors/readers verify that my images and associated captions are correct? They are not spam links. Please let me know your thoughts. Thanks. Z22 (talk) 05:49, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for answering. I work a lot on COI/paid editing issues. I don't know if you can see WP through my eyes, but I see a lot of edits that are really focused on a given product or company, that seek to emphasize the name or brand and include promotional, poorly sourced content about it in every related article possible. I looked at your editing history and it looks a lot like a typical paid editor's. Like the edits you did on the eye tracker, or like the EnergyPod, where you name the product, featuring it in the file name, and the picture, and add (what is in my view) some poorly sourced content about it, to several articles, including a redirect for the product name, like this. It seems that your primary interest is documenting physical culture, and the specifics matter...and you do a lot of generic stuff (like pictures of the boiler), and you say you are not doing paid editing - I have already pushed the boundaries of AGF by asking you the questions above, and i appreciate you taking the time to answer. So I removed the COI category from your page, that came with the warning above. I do ask you to consider avoiding emphasizing company names., brands etc., and especially, linking to company websites as citations for the picture or content, and creating redirects to product or company names. Those specific behaviors ~look~ really promotional and in my view (fwiw) they don't improve WP. Good luck! Jytdog (talk) 13:18, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

@Jytdog:. I can understand your point of view when looking from your angle because you have to work so hard in fighting off those paid editors. I hope you can also look through my point of view in trying to work with images of physical objects. That is sometime very hard to find the secondary sources that visually describe details about them. I can find many secondary sources on the type and principal of operation of products, which I often use for the text contents. However, most of them don't "visually" describe things. My goal is to maintain verifiability. As you may see in my years of edits, I rarely put any new contents (text or images) without having any inline citations. My believe is that, for all images, independent reliable secondary sources are better than primary sources, and primary sources are much better than no source at all which would suggest those images to be WP:NOR.

Regarding product name. The only reason that I put product name and model number on the image upload is for the sole purpose of identification and verifiability of those images. That being said, I agree with you that it may be better not to put brand name and model number directly to image file name on Commons (even though many legitimate editors do), but rather use the generic description. However, when name and model number becomes crucial in identification of the product in the image for verification purposes, I would want to still put that somewhere, maybe in the least prominence place like in "other information" section. I think you maybe right, if my goal is for image identification/verification only, I should not mention the brand/model number in the image caption when adding them to Wikipedia articles because it adds little values for readers to know brand or model number. So I will start that practice. Also, I agree with you that I should not create product name as a redirect page on Wikipedia. Most of the time I don't, but for that particular product, it already passed the threshold of WP:N. I didn't have enough energy to write a new article about it so I just did a redirect page. Going forward, however, I will not do that for the benefits of all of us. A particular product should have its own page and it should stand for the Notability scrutiny by itself. Non-notable product names (or notable products that I have no energy to write an article about) should not get a redirect page at all. So I will do that going forward.

Regarding references, as I mentioned before when working on text, it is much easier to find independent secondary reliable sources. But for image citations, it is harder to find the right sources for them. Still we should not deprive readers from verifiability by not including citation just because the image citation is from a primary source. Not having citation at all for an image inclusion is worst than using primary sources. I understand your position on secondary sources, especially for medical contents as it becomes appearance in your essay. However, if the caption of an image focuses on the physical description on the object (even though it is a medical device), the WP:MEDRS should not be applied because it does not have a medical claim but it is more to do with the design and engineering in nature which would follow the general WP:RS. I'm still trouble with medical-related articles that hold such high standard on sources for the contents, but almost no citation on many of the images included in the articles with medical claims. For instances, CT images of diagnoses, etc. I think image citation is a big verifiability loophole of Wikipedia. I can't fix the world, but I do my part. I rather have image verifiability though primary sources (for non medical claim) than not having it at all.

That being said, I will add back a reference to the patent document for the image caption that explains the location of the components of an eye-tracker. I tried but could not locate a better secondary source for that. Who to say that the gold-color metal located next to the display lens is an LED for illumination to create glints, except by that patent document? That patent document is hardly a promotional material. It's a legal document with no brand name on it and the assignee on the application is a defunct company so there is no way to promote that particular brand / company through the use of that patent document.

Please read all of my points in the above and let me know your thoughts. Thanks again for sharing your passion in maintaining and enhancing Wikipedia to share the knowledge to all. Z22 (talk) 16:58, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Don't know what to say. You are free to do as you like here. I am willing to believe you, that you are not editing for pay. I work mostly on health related stuff, and Project Medicine has a pretty high bar for sourcing WP:MEDRS and a strong style guide WP:MEDMOS, the reason being that those articles are under intense pressure (lots of money and emotion at stake) for people to edit them badly for all kinds of reasons. I will try to work with you to keep content you add to them, but if we can't find good sourcing, it cannot stay. With regard to sourcing for captions describing pictures... that is a very interesting question to me, and you probably have far more experience dealing with the WP:OR of that than I would. IT seems to me that unless you are dealing with a brochure from whoever made the thing, which says that "gold light causes glint", you are doing WP:SYN by connecting a feature in an image to a description of its function. But I know little about that. Is there PAG or community discussion of that somewhere? I would be very interested to read it! Jytdog (talk) 17:16, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for a great conversation. For that particular case on the eye-tracker, the patent has a great details of drawing, locations, description and operation of each component. There is no need for SYN. A product brochure would be a good source but I try to avoid that as you already noted that it gives an appearance of promotional. I am not aware of any PAG discussion regarding image citation concerns. I think it will start a discussion in MEDRS about that first since it has higher bar for the references. Leaving a loophole to ignore image citations could be an issue for such high-bar contents. It may be more beneficial to other editors to discuss there instead of just on my own page. So we may continue our discussion there. Z22 (talk) 18:55, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

thanks! I look forward to seeing that discussion. Best place to have it would probably be at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine and you will find lots of great folks there - more than at MEDRS. Jytdog (talk) 19:11, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eye tracking, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Iris and Limbus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Fixed. Thanks. Z22 (talk) 11:24, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Saint Barnabas Medical Center Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Saint Barnabas Medical Center Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:03, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

This was the old file that had been used in an article. It is no longer used and can be deleted. Z22 (talk) 02:26, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Magneto (generator). Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Biscuittin (talk) 23:38, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Please Help!

Please help! I saw that you said "It seems to me is that permanent magnet synchronous generator is just another name for magneto (generator). Maybe we should just change that page to redirect to this page." on 17 October 2013. If you still hold this opinion, could you say so here: Talk:Magneto_(generator)#RFC_on_the_Status_of_This_Article ? Actually, even if you opinion has changed, I still solicit your comment. Chrisrus (talk) 01:58, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

I don't think the question on "permanent magnet synchronous generator" has any relationship to whether the two articles on magneto should be merged or one of them should be renamed. That's said, PMSG article has no source and I'm not sure whether WP:N is established there. So I will propose to delete that article. Also, I already shared my thought on the magneto. So nothing more I can add there. Z22 (talk) 15:57, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

I take it back. There were references added to the article since last time I raised the question on the permanent magnet synchronous generator article. It may pass the notability requirement now. Z22 (talk) 16:15, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Triple Crown

Congratulations to Z22 as we award this Standard Triple Crown for great work on improving content on Wikipedia. Well done. Freikorp (talk) 06:08, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, Freikorp. This is great. I should go out and celebrate. Z22 (talk) 06:15, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK for E-diesel

Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 20:05, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Racal suit

Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 07:54, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Precious

E-diesel
Thank you for quality articles on New Jersey, trains and electricity, such as Westinghouse Lamp Plant, Higher-speed rail and E-diesel, for uploading hundreds of images, for substantial improvements and pruning, for your list of firsts, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:56, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt: Thank you for the Precious and for your interest in my work. I appreciate the recognition. This is awesome! Z22 (talk) 12:08, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt: FYI, I made an Awesome Wikipedian user box based on the model on you page, but adjust it to have the same dimension as other user boxes out there. I used it for my own user page (User:Z22). Z22 (talk) 03:11, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, will copy! Did you see the offer in the list of recipients? Or here? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:30, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Five years ago, you were recipient no. 1217 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:16, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Double tee

Harrias ^talk 07:01, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Your research work regarding Cecil (lion)

		The Detective Barnstar
		When I make a mistake, I admit it. I was wrong and you proved it. Thank you for your research concerning coverage of Cecil before his death. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:10, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Heritage Middle School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heritage Middle School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heritage Middle School (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jacona (talk) 19:02, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Harrison Elementary School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harrison Elementary School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harrison Elementary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rainbow unicorn (talk) 00:43, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Mt. Pleasant Middle School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mt. Pleasant Middle School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mt. Pleasant Middle School until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rainbow unicorn (talk) 00:44, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elusys Therapeutics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pine Brook, New Jersey. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

A random bowl of strawberries for you!

"It's more like English than code." I like that a lot. Well said! Geekdiva (talk) 09:10, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Hahaha, someone who shares the same feeling. Thanks for the strawberries, @Geekdiva:. Z22 (talk) 11:06, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Z22. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your photo

Hi there. I wrote an article for Two Guns, Arizona and used this wonderful photo. Would you mind if I make a few tweaks to the photo? No cropping or fake coloring, just some small adjustments to restore the true colors. Thanks! Magnolia677 (talk) 13:08, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

@Magnolia677: go for it. Z22 (talk) 13:15, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Done. Thanks! Magnolia677 (talk) 13:19, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Permission to use figure in a book.

Dear Z22,

I am working with Prof. Steven LaValle to help obtain permissions for borrowing figures or pictures in his upcoming book Virtual Reality, to be published by Cambridge University Press. The book is online here:

http://vr.cs.uiuc.edu/

We are hoping to include the picture of yours (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b7/Diagram_of_four_Purkinje_images.svg/300px-Diagram_of_four_Purkinje_images.svg.png) in this book (Chapter 9, Figure 9.18a). Could we please have your permission for this? Thank you.

Please contact me at awarkoczewski@yahoo.com

Sincerely,

Adam Warkoczewski — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.11.38.74 (talk) 16:00, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

This image is licensed under CC BY-SA 4.0. If you agree with the term of the license, you can use it with attribution as "Z22 / Wikimedia Commons / CC-BY-SA-4.0" and provide a link to "https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Diagram_of_four_Purkinje_images.svg" Z22 (talk) 16:37, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Dear Z22,

I would also like to use your picture (https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b7/Diagram_of_four_Purkinje_images.svg/300px-Diagram_of_four_Purkinje_images.svg.png) in my master Thesis. Could i please have your permission for this?

I would use the given attributions.

Please write me at jpingel@uos.de if you are not okay with this. 2A02:8109:1EBF:B128:0:0:0:8DDE (talk) 09:33, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Please feel free to follow the licensing requirement as I explained in the above. Z22 (talk) 16:57, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Permission to use another figure in a book.

Dear Z22,

We are also hoping to include this picture:https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cb/Dark_pupil_by_infrared_or_near_infrared_illumination.jpg

in the book (Chapter 9, Figure 9.18b).  Could we please have your permission for this?  Thank you.

Please contact me at awarkoczewski@yahoo.com

Sincerely,

Adam Warkoczewski — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.11.38.74 (talk) 16:09, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

For this image, click the copyright/license on the link "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3543256/figure/F1/". They also have Creative Common license. Z22 (talk) 16:42, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Horse and Rider (Leonardo da Vinci)

Fyi, I've removed much of the text you moved from another article to create this one three years ago.[1] The text someone had originally pasted in was a suspected copyvio. See Talk:Horse and Rider (Leonardo da Vinci)#History section copyright violation. --Felcotiya (talk) 11:54, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Air bag into Jack (device). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:25, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

@Diannaa: Thank you for the notification. When I copied in the past, I would link the articles to chain the attribution. My understanding at the time of this edit was that I was the sole author of this particular prose. However, I could be wrong. Therefore, it might be just safer to have that attribution linked as you just did for me anyway. Thank you for that. Z22 (talk) 20:54, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

You may have been the sole author; I forgot to check and see if that was the case. Regardless, I typically provide the attribution, especially for large edits, as it gives other editors a better idea of what's going on. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:59, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Z22. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gigabit Wireless, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page E band (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice. Fixed now. Z22 (talk) 13:29, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Be bold!

Hi Z22! Seeing your comments on Talk:High-speed rail and Talk:Higher-speed rail, I agree with you. I know it's nice to let people know things should be changed, but I personally think you should just be bold and make the changes you proposed. Thanks! –Daybeers (talk) 20:21, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

@Daybeers: Did that for higher-speed rail now. For high-speed rail, let's wait for other editors to add thoughts as that part has been reverted back and forth already. Thanks. Z22 (talk) 02:45, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Z22. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Permission to use - File:Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment - overall.jpg

Hello Z22,

I am a research assistant working with the History Channel, hoping to acquire the rights to use this image (link below) of the "CHIME" Telescope in one of our upcoming Television Episodes.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Canadian_Hydrogen_Intensity_Mapping_Experiment_-_overall.jpg

Our office has a specific way of handling the Creative Commons 4.0 Attribution and would appreciate it if you could reach out to us to discuss the rights to the image and proper accreditation.

If you could please email Researcher Matt S -

matt.schwimmer@prometheuspix.com

Thank you for your time!

Sincerely, JamesatPrometheus — Preceding unsigned comment added by JamesatPrometheus (talk • contribs) 21:57, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

The image has CC-SA-4.0 licensing already. Please go ahead and use it with correct attribution per Wikimedia policy. Z22 (talk) 23:54, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Hey Z22,

Even with the CC-SA-4.0 licensing our office requires us to have written consent. There is a form that we are required to have signed in order for use. If interested please email Researcher Matt S and he will be able to send you the form and guide you through the process.

matt.schwimmer@prometheuspix.com

Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JamesatPrometheus (talk • contribs) 00:00, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Yum!

Mxn has eaten your {{subst:cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{subst:cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

 – Minh Nguyễn ^💬 21:43, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pencil tower, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Equitable Building. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Pencil tower at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 12:35, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Pencil tower

On 13 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Pencil tower, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the new slender, super-tall skyscrapers in New York City are known as pencil towers (examples pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pencil tower. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Pencil tower), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:01, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 20,921 views (1,743.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2021 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 01:04, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Congratulations

Congratulations! With 20,921 total views (and 1,743 views per hour), your hook on the pencil towers is the one of most viewed DYK hooks this month. Accordingly, it has been placed in the list at DYKSTATS January. Keep up the great work! Cbl62 (talk) 19:09, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gingerbread (architecture), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Payao.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Typo in Chemical oxygen generator illustration

I wonder if you wouldn't mind correcting the spelling of "Percussion cup and firing mechanism" in the illustration Aircraft_oxygen_generator_diagram.svg that you created for page Chemical oxygen generator? It's "Percussion" not "Purcussion". Unfortunately, I do not have the Wikipedia-fu to fix it myself. Thanks!

Morycm (talk) 04:51, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Higher-speed rail good article reassessment

Higher-speed rail has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Steelkamp (talk) 07:19, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Good work!

A New Orleans tip of the hat

I hereby present you with The N.J.Clesi "I Love You, My New Orleans" Award for Excellence in New Orleans Related Articles. Many thanks as well for all your work in improving categorization and descriptions on Commons!

Congratulations, and keep up the good work! -- Infrogmation (talk) 16:51, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

• By the way, I was aware of the distinction between "balconies" and "galleries" in New Orleans - but wasn't aware of the distinction being used elsewhere, so in the early years of Commons didn't bother to make a category distinction. Thanks for proving me wrong! Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 16:53, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the award. I appreciate it. I love the city. I went there for the first time recently and I was impressed with all those "galleries", tons of them! Z22 (talk) 17:01, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Gallery (New Orleans)

Hello! Your submission of Gallery (New Orleans) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SounderBruce 02:17, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for creating List of fake buildings! Good idea! Mokadoshi (talk) 03:39, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Gallery (New Orleans)

On 13 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gallery (New Orleans), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in New Orleans, galleries differ from balconies because they feature supporting posts? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gallery (New Orleans). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Gallery (New Orleans)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 04:33, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:22, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Newark Venture Partners for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Newark Venture Partners is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newark Venture Partners until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AntiDionysius (talk) 17:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)