User talk:CorbieVreccan: Difference between revisions
Netherzone (talk | contribs) →Could you please take a look at this?: new section |
SandyGeorgia (talk | contribs) Editwarring on a featured article under double discretionary sanctions |
||
Line 334: | Line 334: | ||
Hi Corbie, Could you please take a look at this article [[Iskwē]] per this [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Iskwē&type=revision&diff=1113507339&oldid=1113456116]. I have no opinion one way or another but know that Métis [[Pretendian|pretendians]] are something to be cognizant of, and thought you may be able to check it out with the Métis community. Thanks in advance, and hope all is well in your world. [[User:Netherzone|Netherzone]] ([[User talk:Netherzone|talk]]) 22:22, 1 October 2022 (UTC) |
Hi Corbie, Could you please take a look at this article [[Iskwē]] per this [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Iskwē&type=revision&diff=1113507339&oldid=1113456116]. I have no opinion one way or another but know that Métis [[Pretendian|pretendians]] are something to be cognizant of, and thought you may be able to check it out with the Métis community. Thanks in advance, and hope all is well in your world. [[User:Netherzone|Netherzone]] ([[User talk:Netherzone|talk]]) 22:22, 1 October 2022 (UTC) |
||
== Edit warring at [[J. K. Rowling]], a featured article under double discretionary sanctions == |
|||
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' |
|||
You have shown interest in '''articles about [[WP:Biographies of living persons|living or recently deceased people]], and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles.''' Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect. Any administrator may impose [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic. |
|||
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{tlx|Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Editing of Biographies of Living Persons|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
|||
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> |
|||
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' |
|||
You have shown interest in '''gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them.''' Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect. Any administrator may impose [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic. |
|||
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{tlx|Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gender and sexuality|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
|||
}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> |
|||
[[J. K. Rowling]] is a [[WP:FA|featured article]] that is under '''double''' discretionary sanctions, and was recently subjected to an unprecedented [[WP:FAR|featured article review]] where consensus was built among a couple dozen editors. And yet, you are [[WP:EDITWAR|editwarring]] to insert content that is not based on high-quality sources, does not conform with [[WP:WIAFA]], and is [[WP:UNDUE]] as well; you were |
|||
reverted first [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=J._K._Rowling&diff=1114524773&oldid=1114515478 here by me], and then [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=J._K._Rowling&diff=1114678026&oldid=1114677504 here] by {{u|Hog Farm}}. Further, you initiated a discussion [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:J._K._Rowling&diff=prev&oldid=1114679032 after your re-insertion], not before. Surely you understand this would be inappropriate behavior on any [[WP:FAOWN|featured article]], but is blockable on an article under double discretionary sanctions? [[User:SandyGeorgia|'''Sandy'''<span style="color: green;">Georgia</span>]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 18:45, 7 October 2022 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:45, 7 October 2022
This is CorbieVreccan's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
|
This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated. |
The Drama Llama is Watching You | |
The owner of this page reserves the right to delete trolling and drama at their discretion. |
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful) |
Women and Wikipedia: the world is watching.
This editor is a Veteran Editor IV and is entitled to display this Gold Editor Star. |
19 October 2024 |
|
If you are new here, and feeling angry, please read Tips for the Angry New User before explaining to us how terribly wrong and messed up Wikipedia is. Would you believe, we probably already know? You can also familiarise yourself with Wikipedia culture via these policy links ->
and helpful essays ^^^
If you've been an admin for a while, and are feeling burnt out, take a step back and take some deep breaths, and don't forget to WP:CHILL
What's goin' on...
January 2020 at Women in Red
January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153
|
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Sinn Féin on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:31, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in August 2022
Women in Red August 2022, Vol 8, Issue 8, Nos 214, 217, 236, 237, 238, 239
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
Letting you know that I've opened a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents that concerns you. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ljpernic (talk • contribs) 22:56, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2022).
- An RfC has been closed with consensus to add javascript that will show edit notices for editors editing via a mobile device. This only works for users using a mobile browser, so iOS app editors will still not be able to see edit notices.
- An RfC has been closed with the consensus that train stations are not inherently notable.
- The Wikimania 2022 Hackathon will take place virtually from 11 August to 14 August.
- Administrators will now see links on user pages for "Change block" and "Unblock user" instead of just "Block user" if the user is already blocked. (T308570)
- The arbitration case request Geschichte has been automatically closed after a 3 month suspension of the case.
- You can vote for candidates in the 2022 Board of Trustees elections from 16 August to 30 August. Two community elected seats are up for election.
- Wikimania 2022 is taking place virtually from 11 August to 14 August. The schedule for wikimania is listed here. There are also a number of in-person events associated with Wikimania around the world.
- Tech tip: When revision-deleting on desktop, hold ⇧ Shift between clicking two checkboxes to select every box in that range.
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Holly Woodlawn on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Brothers of Italy on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:2023 Nigerian general election on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:31, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Flag of Antarctica on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:31, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in September 2022
Women in Red September 2022, Vol 8, Issue 9, Nos 214, 217, 240, 241
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Administrators' newsletter – September 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2022).
- A discussion is open to define a process by which Vector 2022 can be made the default for all users.
- An RfC is open to gain consensus on whether Fox News is reliable for science and politics.
- The impact report on the effects of disabling IP editing on the Persian (Farsi) Wikipedia has been released.
- The WMF is looking into making a Private Incident Reporting System (PIRS) system to improve the reporting of harmful incidents through easier and safer reporting. You can leave comments on the talk page by answering the questions provided. Users who have faced harmful situations are also invited to join a PIRS interview to share the experience. To sign up please email Madalina Ana.
- An arbitration case regarding Conduct in deletion-related editing has been closed. The Arbitration Committee passed a remedy as part of the final decision to create a request for comment (RfC) on how to handle mass nominations at Articles for Deletion (AfD).
- The arbitration case request Jonathunder has been automatically closed after a 6 month suspension of the case.
- The new pages patrol (NPP) team has prepared an appeal to the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) for assistance with addressing Page Curation bugs and requested features. You are encouraged to read the open letter before it is sent, and if you support it, consider signing it. It is not a discussion, just a signature will suffice.
- Voting for candidates for the Wikimedia Board of Trustees is open until 6 September.
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:2022 United States Senate election in Pennsylvania on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:31, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Could you take a look at
Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas#Editor adding "sovereign tribal" to multiple articles please? Thanks. Doug Weller talk 13:49, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Society, sports, and culture request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Genspect on a "Society, sports, and culture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:30, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:People's Mojahedin Organization of Iran on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:31, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Bad and not so bad references
Hi CorbieVreccan! Just one note about this[1]: yes, both are bare URLs, and the first one is dead and apparently not even retrievable on the Web Archive. So I am in serious doubt whether the previous additions came with any knowledge about whatever was meant to be cited here :)
But FWIW, the Academia.edu upload is actually a chapter from a published book[2] which looks like a reliable source to me. But still (and unsurprisingly): there is nothing in that chapter about Bracara being the "capital" of the Gallaecians. Austronesier (talk) 21:11, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- What's odd about the book chapter, and the reason I figured it was just a personal upload, is the author didn't use a version that indicates any publication data at that url. I looked at the pages, and the info with it, and didn't see it. Really odd. If it actually cited relevant, reliable content, I'd maybe check to see if it is the same text as the published chapter, or if changes have been made and it's not actually the published version. - CorbieVreccan ☊ ☼ 20:46, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2022
Women in Red October 2022, Vol 8, Issue 10, Nos 214, 217, 242, 243, 244
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 14:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
Your feedback is requested at Talk:Russian occupation of Zaporizhzhia Oblast on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – October 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).
- Following an RfC, consensus was found that if the rationale for a block depends on information that is not available to all administrators, that information should be sent to the Arbitration Committee, a checkuser or an oversighter for action (as applicable, per ArbCom's recent updated guidance) instead of the administrator making the block.
- Following an RfC, consensus has been found that, in the context of politics and science, the reliability of FoxNews.com is unclear and that additional considerations apply to its use.
- Community comment on the revised Universal Code of Conduct enforcement guidelines is requested until 8 October.
- The Articles for creation helper script now automatically recognises administrator accounts which means your name does not need to be listed at WP:AFCP to help out. If you wish to help out at AFC, enable AFCH by navigating to Preferences → Gadgets and checking the "Yet Another AfC Helper Script" box.
- Remedy 8.1 of the Muhammad images case will be rescinded 1 November following a motion.
- A modification to the deletion RfC remedy in the Conduct in deletion-related editing case has been made to reaffirm the independence of the RfC and allow the moderators to split the RfC in two.
- The second phase of the 2021-22 Discretionary Sanctions Review closes 3 October.
- An administrator's account was recently compromised. Administrators are encouraged to check that their passwords are secure, and reminded that ArbCom reserves the right to not restore adminship in cases of poor account security. You can also use two-factor authentication (2FA) to provide an extra level of security.
- Self-nominations for the electoral commission for the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections open 2 October and close 8 October.
- You are invited to comment on candidates in the 2022 CUOS appointments process.
- An RfC is open to discuss whether to make Vector 2022 the default skin on desktop.
- Tech tip: You can do a fuzzy search of all deleted page titles at Special:Undelete.
Could you please take a look at this?
Hi Corbie, Could you please take a look at this article Iskwē per this [3]. I have no opinion one way or another but know that Métis pretendians are something to be cognizant of, and thought you may be able to check it out with the Métis community. Thanks in advance, and hope all is well in your world. Netherzone (talk) 22:22, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Edit warring at J. K. Rowling, a featured article under double discretionary sanctions
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
J. K. Rowling is a featured article that is under double discretionary sanctions, and was recently subjected to an unprecedented featured article review where consensus was built among a couple dozen editors. And yet, you are editwarring to insert content that is not based on high-quality sources, does not conform with WP:WIAFA, and is WP:UNDUE as well; you were reverted first here by me, and then here by Hog Farm. Further, you initiated a discussion after your re-insertion, not before. Surely you understand this would be inappropriate behavior on any featured article, but is blockable on an article under double discretionary sanctions? SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:45, 7 October 2022 (UTC)