Jump to content

MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→‎jackass3d.net: more possibly related sites; waiting on COIBot results before processing this request
m →‎jackass3d.net: fix templates
Line 158: Line 158:


::Possibly related site (on same server):
::Possibly related site (on same server):
::*{{UserSummaryLive|2dmayo.com}}
::*{{LinkSummaryLive|2dmayo.com}}
::*{{UserSummaryLive|backupmaker.net}}
::*{{LinkSummaryLive|backupmaker.net}}
::*{{UserSummaryLive|baixasim.com.br}}
::*{{LinkSummaryLive|baixasim.com.br}}
::*{{UserSummaryLive|coloursoftime.com}}
::*{{LinkSummaryLive|coloursoftime.com}}
::*{{UserSummaryLive|cormons-marketing.com}}
::*{{LinkSummaryLive|cormons-marketing.com}}
::*{{UserSummaryLive|divinity-server.com}}
::*{{LinkSummaryLive|divinity-server.com}}
::*{{UserSummaryLive|giorgio-tomasi.com}}
::*{{LinkSummaryLive|giorgio-tomasi.com}}
::*{{UserSummaryLive|karate-skills.com}}
::*{{LinkSummaryLive|karate-skills.com}}
::*{{UserSummaryLive|makeupbin.com}}
::*{{LinkSummaryLive|makeupbin.com}}
::*{{UserSummaryLive|makeuprep.com}}
::*{{LinkSummaryLive|makeuprep.com}}
::*{{UserSummaryLive|qualmeuip.net}}
::*{{LinkSummaryLive|qualmeuip.net}}
::*{{UserSummaryLive|rafikimedia.org}}
::*{{LinkSummaryLive|rafikimedia.org}}
::*{{UserSummaryLive|servidor2dm.com}}
::*{{LinkSummaryLive|servidor2dm.com}}
::*{{UserSummaryLive|sinfulbollynights.com}}
::*{{LinkSummaryLive|slimdownresources.com}}
::*{{UserSummaryLive|slimdownresources.com}}
::*{{LinkSummaryLive|techaddicts.in}}
::*{{UserSummaryLive|techaddicts.in}}
::*{{LinkSummaryLive|sinfulbollynights.com}}

::*{{UserSummaryLive|throwbackline.com}}


::Possibly related accounts (submitted to digg.com by the same accounts):
::Possibly related accounts (submitted to digg.com by the same accounts):
Line 181: Line 181:


::Possibly related account (shows up on some lists of "similar sites")
::Possibly related account (shows up on some lists of "similar sites")
::*{{UserSummaryLive|bathingapestore.net}}
::*{{LinkSummaryLive|bathingapestore.net}}
::--<font face="Futura">[[User:A. B.|A. B.]] <sup>([[User talk:A. B.|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/A. B.|contribs]])</sup> </font> 19:55, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
::--<font face="Futura">[[User:A. B.|A. B.]] <sup>([[User talk:A. B.|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/A. B.|contribs]])</sup> </font> 19:55, 15 August 2010 (UTC)


Revision as of 19:58, 15 August 2010

    Spam blacklists
    Shortcuts

    Mediawiki:Spam-blacklist is meant to be used by the spam blacklist extension. Unlike the meta spam blacklist, this blacklist affects pages on the English Wikipedia only. Any administrator may edit the spam blacklist. See Wikipedia:Spam blacklist for more information about the spam blacklist.

    Instructions for editors

    There are 4 sections for posting comments below. Please make comments in the appropriate section. These links take you to the appropriate section:

    1. Proposed additions
    2. Proposed removals
    3. Troubleshooting and problems
    4. Discussion

    Each section has a message box with instructions. In addition, please sign your posts with ~~~~ after your comment.

    Completed requests are archived. Additions and removals are logged, reasons for blacklisting can be found there.

    Addition of the templates {{Link summary}} (for domains), {{IP summary}} (for IP editors) and {{User summary}} (for users with account) results in the COIBot reports to be refreshed. See User:COIBot for more information on the reports.

    Instructions for admins
    Any admin unfamiliar with this page should probably read this first, thanks.
    If in doubt, please leave a request and a spam-knowledgeable admin will follow-up.

    Please consider using Special:BlockedExternalDomains instead, powered by the AbuseFilter extension. This is faster and more easily searchable, though only supports whole domains and not whitelisting.

    1. Does the site have any validity to the project?
    2. Have links been placed after warnings/blocks? Have other methods of control been exhausted? Would referring this to our anti-spam bot, XLinkBot be a more appropriate step? Is there a WikiProject Spam report? If so, a permanent link would be helpful.
    3. Please ensure all links have been removed from articles and discussion pages before blacklisting. (They do not have to be removed from user or user talk pages.)
    4. Make the entry at the bottom of the list (before the last line). Please do not do this unless you are familiar with regular expressions — the disruption that can be caused is substantial.
    5. Close the request entry on here using either {{done}} or {{not done}} as appropriate. The request should be left open for a week maybe as there will often be further related sites or an appeal in that time.
    6. Log the entry. Warning: if you do not log any entry you make on the blacklist, it may well be removed if someone appeals and no valid reasons can be found. To log the entry, you will need this number – 379096052 after you have closed the request. See here for more info on logging.


    Proposed additions

    trunkarchive.com

    PhotoFan76's contributions consist almost exclusively of creating new biographical articles for photographers whose sole common feature is that they are all represented by the media-licensing company http://trunkarchive.com; each article includes a link to a page from this site. I note that the account Trunkarchive (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) has made similar edits, as has Photoarchive (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and wonder if this is either a concerted promotional effort or some socking. -- Rrburke (talk) 01:34, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    plus Added. Given all the notices they've failed to heed, I see no other way to keep this company from continuing to abuse Wikipedia for their own marketing purposes.
    Trusted, established editors who see an application for these links as a reliable source for some article can always request whitelisting of specific pages at MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist.
    --A. B. (talk • contribs) 17:26, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    This still leaves 40+ potentially spammy articles to review for notability, conflict of interest and neutrality:
    1. Achim Lippoth
    2. Alex Cayley -- speedied 15/08/10 --RrB
    3. Andrew Bettles -- speedied 15/08/10 --RrB
    4. Anne Menke
    5. Bela Borsodi
    6. Bruno Dayan -- speedied 15/08/10 --RrB
    7. Chris Craymer
    8. Coppi Barbieri -- tagged WP:CSD#G11 15/08/10 --RrB
    9. Doug Inglish
    10. Emma Summerton
    11. Enrique Badulescu -- tagged WP:CSD#G11 15/08/10 --RrB
    12. Eric Frideen
    13. Fabio Chizzola
    14. François Halard
    15. Frédéric Lagrange
    16. Graeme Montgomery (photographer)
    17. Greg Kadel
    18. Horacio Salinas (photographer)
    19. Jason Schmidt (photographer)
    20. John Akehurst
    21. John Clang
    22. Kutlu
    23. Marc Hom
    24. Martyn Thompson
    25. Matt Jones (photographer)
    26. Matthew Brookes -- speedied 15/08/10 --RrB
    27. Melodie McDaniel
    28. Neil Stewart
    29. Pamela Hanson
    30. Patric Shaw
    31. Robin Derrick
    32. Ronny Jaques
    33. Simon Emmett
    34. Simon Watson (photographer)
    35. Steve Hiett
    36. Straulino
    37. Susanna Howe
    38. The Collective Shift
    39. Tim Barber
    40. Toby McFarlan Pond
    41. Trunk Archive
    --A. B. (talk • contribs) 17:33, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Update on the above: I've left notes on the above 41 articles' talk pages but the articles themselves still need to be checked and tagged with {{coi}}, {{notability}} and, in some cases, maybe {{copyvio}}. --A. B. (talk • contribs) 20:02, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Here's a list of articles previously deleted by others:
    1. Brigitte Lacombe -- earlier version was deleted as a copyright violation
    2. Carlotta Manaigo
    3. Carlton Davis
    4. David Slijper
    5. Derek Kettela
    6. Eric Traore (photographer)
    7. Igor Borisov (current article is about a Russian athlete, not a photographer)
    8. Jan Welters
    9. Josh Olins
    10. Lorenzo Bringheli
    11. Martien Mulder
    12. Michael Baumgarten (photographer)
    13. Nikolas Koenig
    14. Rennio Maifredi
    15. Sasha Eisenman
    Many of the deleted articles had copyright issues; the list of 40+ still-existing articles above should also be checked for copyright issues.
    --A. B. (talk • contribs) 18:02, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Other pages edited by one or more of the spammers; these should be checked for problems:
    1. Bruce Weber (photographer)
    2. Clang (photographer)
    3. Clive Arrowsmith
    4. Denis Piel
    5. Elaine Constantine
    6. Fabbio Chizzola
    7. Francesco Carrozzini
    8. Guy Aroch
    9. Harry Peccinotti
    10. Hedi Slimane
    11. Inez van Lamsweerde and Vinoodh Matadin
    12. Jean Pigozzi
    13. Jerry Schatzberg
    14. Jock Sturges
    15. John C.L. Ang
    16. John Getz
    17. Kayt Jones
    18. Mary Ellen Mark
    19. Matthew Brooks
    20. Max Vadukul
    21. Mike Potter (makeup artist)
    22. Nick Knight (photographer)
    23. Norbert Schoerner
    24. Philip-Lorca diCorcia
    25. Rankin (photographer)
    26. Raymond Meier (photographer)
    27. Roxanne Lowit
    28. Terry Richardson
    29. Tierney Gearon
    30. Walter Chin
    31. Yelena Yemchuk
    --A. B. (talk • contribs) 19:48, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    literateur.com

    Spammers

    Frequently spammed blog - MrOllie (talk) 13:45, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    plus Added --A. B. (talk • contribs) 20:08, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Given some of the contention over these links, I suggest also check-usering the accounts you've listed. --A. B. (talk • contribs) 20:27, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    jackass3d.net

    See WikiProject Spam report MER-C 04:57, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Another spam account:
    More spam domains:
    Related sites:
    Possibly related site (on same server):


    Possibly related accounts (submitted to digg.com by the same accounts):
    Possibly related account (shows up on some lists of "similar sites")
    --A. B. (talk • contribs) 19:55, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Proposed removals

    Pantheon.org

    Following a discussion at the administrators' noticeboard, Encyclopedia Mythica was recently blacklisted. The premise of the argument for blacklisting was that the site contains gross misinformation, and pantheon.org/articles/e/eisa.html is cited as containing "total nonsense". As a result of the discussion, a bot was configured to purge references to the cite from our articles, and at least three AfDs were initiated: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Perendi, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prende, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Verbti.

    Now, I am certainly not an expert in this area, but there does not appear to be any objective evidence to support any of these actions. The content of Encyclopedia Mythica's article on Eisa is echoed by a fair number of books, one dating back as far as 1895. The nominator did mention that we once propagated deliberate falsehoods from the site, but no verifiable examples of such were cited. Unless empirical information to support these actions can be found, I move that we delist the site and attempt damage control of related bot activity.   — C M B J   21:22, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Just because some entries on that site may be semi-correct doesn't of course mean it's a reliable source. They don't document their own sources in any way. As for the "Eisa" entry, I don't know what the person who made that judgment thought about it, but I can see at least one potential serious error: referring to Loki's "second wife" (according to other sources, there are two distinct traditions mentioning a different name of a wife each (along with different genealogies of Loki himself), but not a single tradition mentioning a sequence of Loki having two wives in succession). Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:00, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    And their entry on "Prende" (pantheon.org/articles/p/prende.html) certainly is a lot of nonsense. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:04, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    So far, everything contained in the Encyclopedia Mythica's entries on Eisa and Prende has been echoed by multiple independent sources. Again, administrative action must be justified by empirical evidence, and every claim that this site is less than reliable remains unverifiable.   — C M B J   22:50, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    I can't be bothered to point out all the contradictions between these sources above – only, for instance, that a "second wife" isn't the same as a "first wife", and 26 July isn't always a Friday. But in any case: to prove that this isn't a reliable source, we don't even need any particular errors. It's technically unreliable simply because it fails the criteria of academic standing, editorial review and documentation demanded by WP:RS. Fut.Perf. ☼ 05:57, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    The Friday detail is not really relevant to this discussion since it isn't mentioned in the Encyclopedia Mythica entry, but even if it was, that would not be evidence of an error; it is entirely reasonable that a weekly pagan tradition would differ from (or perhaps coexist with) an annual Catholic day of feast. I have re-read the aforementioned Encyclopedia Mythica articles about four times each now, yet "second wife" is nowhere to be found. Are you perhaps mistaking one of the books for this site?   — C M B J   09:07, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    The fact that this ad-supported website is an unreliable source cannot be overstated, and it is guilty of pumping misinformation all over the internet. The site is the bane of mythology articles on Wikipedia and, as we're usually one of the first Google hits on any given subject, we are doing the internet a service by maintaining a ban on this site. Just as an example, there is absolutely no source for any other wife of Loki outside of Sigyn (Angrboða is attested as simply mothering three children by him) and, further, there is no source for Loki having a daughter outside of Hel (who is attested as one of the three children mothered by Angrboða). Where then does this information stem from? It seems that someone has equated Loki with Logi, and that they've just ran with it (Glut is an anglicized form of Glöð) and presented it to the world as fact.
    A Google Books search turns up that this anglicization used in this manner appears in at least one of H. A. Guerber's (died 1929) works about Norse mythology (for example: [1]), where she is clearly combining heavy moralizing with fast and free treatment of attestations. Presumably, "Encyclopedia Mythica" got a hold of one of these works, took it at face value, and half-assedly slapped it up on their website, where it has been bouncing around ever since (and even spreading to recent non-scholarly publications, as Google Books indicates).
    In matters Norse, this is hardly the only example where "Encyclopedia Mythica" churns out misinformation for advertising dollars, in fact it gets much worse—they presents figures by the names of "Brono" (no reference provided—no Google Books hits), "Geirrendour" (where their article presents the theory that the Mothers of Heimdall and Daughters of Ægir are the same figures as simple fact), "Glaur" (no reference provided), and "Laga" (???) as deities in Norse mythology, whereas they seem to have similarly come from some other dubious source or, in cases like Brono and Laga, may have been derived from who knows where. They are certainly not found in Old Norse sources, as a quick look in the major Germanic mythology handbooks (Rudolf Simek, John Lindow, Andy Orchard) will indicate. On top of that, they present the Nordic Baroque and Rococo creations of Astrild ("In Norse mythology, Astrild is the goddess of love"—!) and Jofur (apparently removed) as Norse deities.
    However, these facts, at the very least, shows some serious confusion on the part of "Encyclopedia Mythica", and well illustrates how unreliable a source it is. Of course, this is ignoring how poor the quality is in the entries for figures who actually are attested. Every effort needs to be made to keep this terrible site blacklisted. :bloodofox: (talk) 04:58, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    I've read these discussions, and I think the answer is simple:  Defer to Whitelist. If you have specific links, from which specific information can be used following our policies and guidelines (WP:V, WP:RS, etc.), then those links can be whitelisted (if on the whitelist a plethora of pages is whitelisted then maybe we could reconsider this). CMBJ, it seems above that you prove reliability of this site here by using other sources .. are those other sources then not by definition the ones you should use here on wikipedia .. obviously, there seems to be misinformation mixed in with the correct information (if I have a document that says that grass is green stuff, that grows on the inside of my office windows, drinks beer for lunch and can't swim, then obviously, it is right in saying that grass is green .. but the rest of the document is completely unverifiable, and I would even have to find another source to show that grass is actually green ..). --Dirk Beetstra T C 08:18, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    michaelburns.net

    michaelburns.net: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

    I am not sure why my domain was blacklisted. I am a Physicist (Michael Burns) presently a Visiting Scholar at Boston College ([2]), with over 50 scientific research articles published in major refereed scientific and engineering journals. My michaelburns.net domain is a personal website, however it does get linked to quite a bit as copies of many of my scientific research articles can be downloaded from michaelburns.net for free. Those scientific and engineering articles are authoritative sources used by others in my field. There are other technical materials on michaelburns.net that get occasionally linked, but the main point is that this website has no commercial aspects to it. My concern with it being blacklisted by Wikipedia is that blacklists tend to propagate without any vetting. I don’t care whether Wikipedia contains any links to my site, but I would like it not to be blacklisted.— Preceding unsigned comment added by MichaelJBurns (talk • contribs)

    fredlwm.iblogger.org

    fredlwm.iblogger.org: Linksearch en (insource) - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C X-wiki • gs • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced - RSN • COIBot-Link, Local, & XWiki Reports - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.com

    I'm requesting a whitelisting of this specific subdomain of iblogger.org for use as an additional External link on Lynx (web browser). The site is maintained by Frédéric L. W. Meunier, and is linked to from the Lynx homepage (see http://lynx.isc.org/current/#other, under DOS/Win32. The second link, http://www.pervalidus.net/cygwin/lynx/, which is maintained by Mr. Meunier, redirects to the iblogger.org site.). This site is one of only two places I could find current stable releases of Win32 ports of the Lynx browser. The parent domain was blocked in December of 2008 (see http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Spam_blacklist/Log/2008#December_2008) by Mike.lifeguard, after freewebtown.com was requested to be blacklisted on Dec. 5, 2008. It was included in a list of 117 domains with this explanation: "In addition, the following 117 domains are involved (after removing anything even remotely legitimate)". Thanks. Earthsound (talk) 05:49, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Eh .. this is the spam blacklist, basically,  Defer to Whitelist. I fail however to see how this would pass WP:EL, we are not an internet directory, and this does not exactly add a lot of non-includable information, except for a bit of a manual and the download links. --Dirk Beetstra T C 07:15, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Troubleshooting and problems

    Logging / COIBot Instr

    Blacklist logging

    Full instructions for admins


    Quick reference

    For Spam reports or requests originating from this page, use template {{/request|0#section_name}}

    • {{/request|213416274#Section_name}}
    • Insert the oldid 213416274 a hash "#" and the Section_name (Underscoring_spaces_where_applicable):
    • Use within the entry log here.

    For Spam reports or requests originating from Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam use template {{WPSPAM|0#section_name}}

    • {{WPSPAM|182725895#Section_name}}
    • Insert the oldid 182725895 a hash "#" and the Section_name (Underscoring_spaces_where_applicable):
    • Use within the entry log here.
    Note: If you do not log your entries, it may be removed if someone appeals the entry and no valid reasons can be found.

    Addition to the COIBot reports

    The lower list in the COIBot reports now have after each link four numbers between brackets (e.g. "www.example.com (0, 0, 0, 0)"):

    1. first number, how many links did this user add (is the same after each link)
    2. second number, how many times did this link get added to wikipedia (for as far as the linkwatcher database goes back)
    3. third number, how many times did this user add this link
    4. fourth number, to how many different wikipedia did this user add this link.

    If the third number or the fourth number are high with respect to the first or the second, then that means that the user has at least a preference for using that link. Be careful with other statistics from these numbers (e.g. good user who adds a lot of links). If there are more statistics that would be useful, please notify me, and I will have a look if I can get the info out of the database and report it. This data is available in real-time on IRC.

    Poking COIBot

    When adding {{LinkSummary}}, {{UserSummary}} and/or {{IPSummary}} templates to WT:WPSPAM, WT:SBL, WT:SWL and User:COIBot/Poke (the latter for privileged editors) COIBot will generate linkreports for the domains, and userreports for users and IPs.


    Discussion

    duplicate entries in blacklist

    I was doing a scan of the blacklist and came across a handful of entries that are listed twice, and some that are both here and on the global blacklist.

    I can remove the duplicates here; but I wanted to ask before removing the entries that are both listed here and on global - to me, it's reasonable to remove the local entry if it's also on global; but wasn't sure if there was a reason for having the entries at both. Also, for those who have access to the global blacklist, I found a handful that are listed multiple times on global. Note in the lists that the entry for \bbestdissertation\.com\b is both listed twice locally and listed on global.

    Double on local
    \baprilcalendar\.net\b
\bastrocytoma\.org\b
\baugustcalendar\.net\b
\bazotemia\.net\b
\bbestdissertation\.com\b
\bblack-cohosh\.org\b
\bcalendaryear\.net\b
\bcompartmentsyndrome\.net\b
\bcure-tinnitus-guide\.blogspot\.com\b
\bddrsdram\.net\b
\bendstagekidneydisease\.com\b
\bfamilyext\.net\b
\bfinancet\.org\b
\bfinancialdict\.org\b
\bfindchalet\.com\b
\bhonestevivere\.com\b
\bhyperkalemia\.net\b
\binfectiousmononucleosis\.org\b
\blupus-erythematosus\.com\b
\bmodifiedcarphotos\.com\b
\bmotorpix\.com\b
\bnintendo-wii-homebrew-unlock-hack\.blogspot\.com\b
\boctobercalendar\.net\b
\bornithine\.net\b
\bparesthesia\.net\b
\bpatio-covers\.com\b
\bpaudarco\.org\b
\bpernicious-anemia\.net\b
\bradiculopathy\.net\b
\btheubie\.com\b
\bthyroidproblems\.org\b
\bturmericbenefits\.com\b
    Both local and global
    \bafricacupofnationshighlights\.blogspot\.com\b
\bbestdissertation\.com\b
\bbestessay\.org\b
\bbestessays\.ca\b
\bbestessays\.com\.au\b
\bbesttermpaper\.com\b
\bcountryguidebook\.com\b
\bcustom-essaywriting\.blogspot\.com\b
\bdiscussionshome\.com\b
\belectronicmusicfree\.com\b
\bessaydot\.com\b
\bessayontime\.com\b
\bessaywriters\.net\b
\blifesyrup\.com\b
\bmedicanalife\.com\b
\bmedicanatv\.com\b
\bonline-sport-betting\.org\b
\bpsalmtours\.com\b
\bresearch-service\.com\b
\bresumesplanet\.com\b
\brushessay\.com\b
\bslots-machines-online\.net\b
\bsuperiorpapers\.com\b
\bterm-paper-research\.com\b
\btt-group\.net\b
\bwikipediahatescheerleaders\.blogspot\.com\b
    Double on global
    \bcatatansiboyiiii\.blogspot\.com\b
\beasyurl\.net\b
\bhuaweie220\.com\b
\bhuaweie220\.net\b
\binmassage\.net\b
\bis\.gd\b
\bresearch-service\.com\b
\bre-shui\.cn\b
\bsuperiorpapers\.com\b
\btr\.im\b
\bvornesitzen\.de\b
\bxr\.com\b
\byy\.vc\b

    --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 17:10, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    Hi!
    I deleted the double entries at meta. You can do the same here. And you can also delete those local entries that are globally listed. The only disadvantage would be that if - at some time in future - a website get's unblacklisted at meta and should still be blocked in w:en (that's a rare case anyway) then one has to put it manually at en-wiki again. But that should not be a real problem. -- seth (talk) 15:06, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    I've removed the entries that were duplicates on the local blacklist (leaving one entry for each item). Will cleanup the items that are both here and on Meta later tonight. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:08, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Was this finished, Barek? --Dirk Beetstra T C 20:35, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist&oldid=379096052"