Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Dolberty (talk | contribs)
133 edits
Dolberty (talk | contribs)
133 edits
Paraduin
Line 400: Line 400:
* {{revisions|Light (fantasy)}}
* {{revisions|Light (fantasy)}}
The article [[Light (fantasy)]] was deleted as 'original research' while I was still adding sources. It was already marked for deletion before I could add a second sentence... I have asked the closing administrator, [[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] to move it to draft, so I can continue working on the text[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Anachronist&diff=790575441&oldid=790461256], but (s)he has not responded. Please move it to [[Draft:Light (fantasy)]] with the editing history. [[User:Dolberty|Dolberty]] ([[User talk:Dolberty|talk]]) 10:36, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
The article [[Light (fantasy)]] was deleted as 'original research' while I was still adding sources. It was already marked for deletion before I could add a second sentence... I have asked the closing administrator, [[User:Anachronist|Anachronist]] to move it to draft, so I can continue working on the text[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Anachronist&diff=790575441&oldid=790461256], but (s)he has not responded. Please move it to [[Draft:Light (fantasy)]] with the editing history. [[User:Dolberty|Dolberty]] ([[User talk:Dolberty|talk]]) 10:36, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

== Paraduin ==
* {{revisions|Paraduin}}
The article [[Paraduin]] was deleted for lack of significant coverage in reliable sources, which I think is not true. People claimed it was 'stealing content from [[Liberland]]' but it is the other way around, Liberland is the copycat. The author was even banned for creating this article, and some of the delete and ban voters are Liberland fans, so part of this seems personal. I think the article was fine but not complete yet. I'd like to work on it, as a draft if it's not undeleted as an article. [[User:Dolberty|Dolberty]] ([[User talk:Dolberty|talk]]) 11:13, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:14, 21 July 2017

    Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
    Shortcuts
    "WP:RFU" redirects here. For requests for unblock, see Category:Requests for unblock. For requests for unprotection, see Wikipedia:Requests for page protection § Current requests for reduction in protection level.

    Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

    This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7 or G11 be undeleted here.

    Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

    Instructions for special cases
    float
    float
    float
    float
    Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

    Deletion discussions
    Articles
    Templates and modules
    Files
    Categories
    Redirects
    Miscellany
    Speedy deletion
    Proposed deletion

    User:ChaseF/sandbox

    I wasn't aware the page was public and need to retrieve the information that was deleted, please! —ChaseF (talk) 04:00, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @ChaseF: if you enable the facility for other users to send emails to you account (see Wikipedia:Emailing users) then somebody can email you the contents of the page. Hut 8.5 06:34, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @Hut 8.5: I added my email, could you please have someone email me the contents? Thank you!

    File:Nintendo - 1950.png

    Image was deleted for non-free file usage violations, as I became aware of this just now, I would like to have the page restored and inspect the problem to resolve it, instead of deleting it, so to not have to have a hole in Nintendo's logo history. —Lordtobi (✉) 17:29, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Lordtobi: The image looks like an ace of spades playing card. The deletion rationale was "Not used according to the purpose stated in the rationale: as the primary means of visual identification at the top of the article." How do you propose to resolve that? ~Anachronist (talk) 23:20, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Well, the image was not used in the infobox, and it seems that it was its only violation? So, we can simply put a rationale for a section-used image (I know that there is) and have the file not violate anything else. Lordtobi (✉) 16:37, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @Lordtobi: OK, I have restored it and changed the rationale. Please go in and make corrections as needed, and add the image to the article otherwise it will be deleted again. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:46, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks, appreciate it! I have adapted the rationale and the image in the article. Lordtobi (✉) 13:02, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Clifford michaels

    I dont see why he is not a notable person, his books were famous all over the world which satisfies the notability criteria in wikipedia —59.88.244.142 (talk) 03:51, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Then discuss it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clifford michaels. This page isn't the place for it. See the message in the box at the top. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:27, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Abryanz Style and Fashion Awards

    This is an award ceremony not a product or and anything that is promoted. I request it is not deleted. Please advice how i can make it better. Kind Regards —Kawalyadouglas (talk) 05:24, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Kawalyadouglas: It was written in a blatantly promotional, non-neutral tone, and as such it wasn't suitable for main article space. It would require a complete rewrite. I recommend you start over again in draft space. Create the article at Draft:Abryanz Style and Fashion Awards and submit it for review via the process described at Wikipedia:Articles for creation. If you are in any way associated with that event, then you have a conflict of interest, and Articles for Creation is the only viable venue available to you to get an article published on Wikipedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:32, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:NACRA

    I, ZeroXero, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ZeroXero (talk) 17:12, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    National Institute of Textile Engineering and Research

    {{subst:refund National Institute of Textile Engineering and Research It is a article about an educational institution. Someone tried to delete the page and someone wrote bad language in this page. I would request to undelete and revert it to previous stage what is was before. i don't know why he wrote bad things about a good engineering institution. please. }}

    This page, National Institute of Textile Engineering and Research, has not yet been deleted. Please visit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Institute of Textile Engineering and Research (2nd nomination) to find out how to object to the deletion request. Nyttend (talk) 02:17, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    File:EDSA.jpg

    I'm requesting the undeletion of File:EDSA.jpg (deleted on 24 November 2016). After analyzing this now-deleted img (analyzed via a screenshot of the file's page that I captured last year and the contribs of its uploader), I am now confident and definite that its author is Docrx, and it belongs to him (using his upload log and contributions list). I admit that I made a mistake of forgetting to put {{Information |description…}} on the file. Despite this, I may need some additional advice/comments over this, though. Thanks. —JWilz12345 (talk) 01:48, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Restored, but I'm somewhat uncomfortable with the situation. The file shouldn't have been deleted for lack of source, because the source was indicated in the upload log. However, the source page (see it via the Internet Archive) is a forum where people posted a lot of images (they weren't archived, so I don't know which one it was), and this just isn't the situation where you routinely find images with free licenses. I'm tempted to send this to FFD. Nyttend (talk) 02:15, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    The file seems to have two versions: one img of EDSA going to Makati by User:Kjbaldio and the other img of EDSA at the intersection of North and West Avenues by User:Docrx (the latter is the one i'm referring to; the restored version is Kjbaldio's). If i'm not mistaken, the former was moved to commons before in Nov. 2011 but was deleted (from Commons page Overwritten file (this version was sourced to a third party site, see file history at the bottom of the page).JWilz12345 (talk) 03:33, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I've added the info field based on Docrx's version (not the dubious, restored version by Kjbaldio)JWilz12345 (talk) 04:10, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    I've deleted the copyvio version again, and restored the original. The original had a GFDL tag with no author information. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:03, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Joe_MacMillan

    I, 82.181.122.143, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 82.181.122.143 (talk) 11:48, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Henley Visa Restrictions Index

    Merge the history versions to Henley & Partners Visa Restrictions Index and create a redirect in this title. —GZWDer (talk) 18:13, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Pump up from Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 274--GZWDer (talk) 12:52, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @GZWDer:  Done, history merged and title redirected. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:11, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Template:NCAA Season 92 juniors' volleyball

    The template is being used as record for the season page. Thanks. —Linsanity 15:49, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

    The template is being used as record for the season page. Thanks. —Linsanity 15:49, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

    File:Raveendran.jpg

    This is a fair use image of a deceased person. It was deleted as unused image when someone tried to use a different image which is now deleted on copyright grounds. --Sreejith K (talk) 19:54, 15 July 2017 (UTC) —Sreejith K (talk) 19:54, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    CPC character set

    This character set developed by Amstrad. —Rowan03 (talk) 20:12, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator that closed the deletion debate instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 05:35, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    International federation of standards users

    {{subst:refund|1= International federation of standards users |2= G12 talks about "copyrighted material with no credible assertion of public domain" - IFAN is a public organization for the users, which are basicly everyone! it is not a company or an organization with copyright materials - it is an organization ment to help users around the world and therfore there are no copyrights involved. G12 talk about "Public-domain and other free content, such as a Wikipedia mirror, do not fall under this criterion" and therfore I think that this page needs to stay on the air. If a specific change is required, please let me know and I'll change it. Thank you very muuch for your dedicated work!

    •  Not done that organisation has this on their page: "Copyright ©2015 IFAN" which indicates they are not releasing the content into the public domain. If this organisation does want its materials to be freely used, they must put an appropriate written statement out to say so. If it exists you can indicate to us where it is. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:24, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Luke Davis

    The "Luke Davis" wikipedia page was deleted for Vandalism but recently a very notable person in the bass fishing industry with the name of Luke Davis has become very successful in his field and has thousands of fans and followers worldwide and I feel that he needs a wikipedia page. However it says that the page was deleted so I am requesting to have this page undeleted. Thanks! —Lukeallen42 (talk) 02:14, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Hello Lukeallen42! I've taken a look at the deleted versions of that page, and none of them appear to be about anyone in the bass fishing industry. It appears that back in 2011 the page was about a different person, was deleted, and was locked from being recreated. Since that was such a long time ago I've gone ahead and unprotected the page so that anyone can create a new article at the page Luke Davis.
    Before you go and create a new page, some useful reading material: Wikipedia only includes articles about people when we are sure there is enough verifiable information out there to write a neutral, factually accurate article. Take a look at our notability guidance for articles about people, and the specific guidance for athletes and sports personalities. If you believe that this person meets these guidelines you can go ahead and create a new article at Luke Davis. Prodego talk 02:37, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    File:The_eagle_flies.JPG

    I need to review the upload history to determine if it's the uploader's own work, etc. ——Guanaco 04:40, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Guanaco: There is only one upload in the deleted history, uploaded by User:Mierlo, and it appears to be identical to the version in the visible history. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:16, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @Anachronist: Is there anything in the deleted page history to indicate source and permission? —Guanaco 21:08, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @Guanaco: nothing that isn't in the Commons description page, the description and licence tag there were added by Mierlo. Hut 8.5 21:29, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Eshaan_Sahney

    Sahney.eshaan (talk) 08:57, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Sahney.eshaan: Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Materialscientist (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
    It was also deleted as being unambiguously promotional, and we cannot restore it for that reason either. Please start over in draft space. And remember writing about yourself on Wikipedia is strongly discouraged. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:19, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:HypeFreaX

    I, Samchoksi, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Samchoksi (talk) 10:17, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Hut 8.5 20:53, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:RepairQ

    I, 76.213.116.145, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 76.213.116.145 (talk) 13:25, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 18:22, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Jeremie (Musician)

    I, 192.114.23.209, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 192.114.23.209 (talk) 15:04, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    'murica

    This was a redirect deleted per WP:G8. Since its target 'Murica was restored, WP:G8 no longer applies. —Steel1943 (talk) 23:26, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Eshaan_Sahney (2nd request)

    I am singer and I want my background and other information listed on Wikipedia too like other singers, guarantee that the information provided is original and belongs to me and then click the "Save page" button below —Sahney.eshaan (talk) 05:23, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done and will not be done See the previous response to you.--Orange Mike | Talk 05:41, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @Sahney.eshaan: You were given advice on how to proceed above. Please heed it. Repeated requests on this page, after your request has already been declined, is considered disruptive and can lead to your account being blocked. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:21, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    International federation of standards users

    {{subst:refund|1= International federation of standards users |2= Attached is the previous conversation concerning the deletion of the page:

    {{subst:refund|1= International federation of standards users |2= G12 talks about "copyrighted material with no credible assertion of public domain" - IFAN is a public organization for the users, which are basicly everyone! it is not a company or an organization with copyright materials - it is an organization ment to help users around the world and therfore there are no copyrights involved. G12 talk about "Public-domain and other free content, such as a Wikipedia mirror, do not fall under this criterion" and therfore I think that this page needs to stay on the air. If a specific change is required, please let me know and I'll change it. Thank you very muuch for your dedicated work!

    the answer I got: 

    Not done that organisation has this on their page: "Copyright ©2015 IFAN" which indicates they are not releasing the content into the public domain. If this organisation does want its materials to be freely used, they must put an appropriate written statement out to say so. If it exists you can indicate to us where it is. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:24, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

    my corrent answer to you now: please take in consideration that the "Copyright ©2015 IFAN" no longer exist on the IFAN page, which means they allow the release of their content. since this was the only problem, and since its now solved, I sincerly ask to upload the page again and let the public know about it. thank you very much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by NiD123 (talk • contribs) 06:56, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Not done copyright exists automatically unless the author specifically disclaims it, the fact that a piece of text doesn't have a copyright notice on it does not mean that the text isn't copyrighted. "Public domain" here refers to the legal concept of public domain, namely that works are free from copyright if they meet certain criteria (such as being too old), I see no evidence that this text is in the public domain. The author of the text would need to follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for us to use it. However I don't think that this would likely make an acceptable article even if we could resolve the copyright issue. Hut 8.5 18:03, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:Itransition

    I, Kotsclefa, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kotsclefa (talk) 07:39, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:24, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    1975 in sumo

    This was deleted in a mass purge of a user, but this article has notibility and should be undeleted. —180.2.196.50 (talk) 07:44, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    no Declined. The deleted article contains just one sentence: "Bobby Suetsuga competes in the first match between foreigners in sumo history." That's hardly a treatment of the whole year of 1975. Start over from scratch. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:26, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Apple Calendar iOS.svg

    Both revisions were deleted under G7 when I asked just for the earliest revision deleted. Was undeleted, than deleted again as the speedy tag had not been removed. Please could you undelete just the latter revision of the image? —Sceptre (talk) 13:26, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Aaghaz-e-Dosti

    I, Ravinitesh, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ravi nitesh 13:52, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

    Could not get time to arrange edit it further in accordance with the requirement but now it can be done —ravi nitesh 13:53, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

    Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 20:28, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Henry Abner

    I'm requesting that this article, which was recently deleted at AfD, be restored at the title Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia/Henry Abner. This is the normal practice for hoaxes that had remained undetected for so long. The procedure for restoring, as well as performing the necessary cleanup, is outlined inside the collapsable box at the top of Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia. —– Uanfala 17:03, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Liz Lohuis

    Please undelete this page I see is important than a thousands of pages, as journalist as reporter as woman. —41.251.69.244 (talk) 19:01, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion A7, indicating an article that did not explain or prove why the subject was notable. A7 deletions are not overturned here; try contacting the deleting administrator (RickinBaltimore (talk · contribs)) instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:29, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    BrightHR

    BrigthHR was deleted before I had the opportunity to properly contest the speedy deletion notification. —Cosmicsqueaker (talk) 23:02, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

     Not done for now. @Cosmicsqueaker: First, you have a conflict of interest indicated in the deleted history. You need to disclose that publicly, preferably on your user page. See WP:PAID for guidance.
    Second, as an editor with a conflict of interest, you should not be creating or making significant contributions to articles in the main space. You should be using your sandbox or draft space, and then submit the article for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation.
    Finally, the speedy deletion notice need not have been contested, because the new article you created was very short compared to the one that got deleted. It was just a couple of sentences, and did not appear to address the concerns raised in the deletion discussion.
    If you wish, I can restore the entire history to draft space for you to submit via WP:AFC, but I prefer you publicly disclose your affiliation with BrightHR first on your user page. ~Anachronist (talk) 00:08, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Roshan Vichare

    Reference tag which was not added earlier is now added —VidhiV (talk) 05:36, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    amos nondi

    because nondi played in an league allstars match and was also named among the top players in kenya, he also earned a call up for the national team which qualifies him as a top player — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kennwes32 (talk • contribs) 11:21, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    That's irrelevant. What criteria in WP:FOOTY does he meet? Also, the article doesn't seem to be threatened by deletion at the moment. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:10, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @Anachronist: I nominated it as a CSD G4 before regretting it, since I could not be sure it was a copy of older article version. However the article was deleted at AfD earlier as it was deemed not notable and nothing has changed since. The article still does not pass WP:GNG or WP:FOOTY and should be deleted. Also probably creation protected as it has now been created three times by the same editor. Qed237 (talk) 17:04, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    It has now bewen deleted. Qed237 (talk) 17:10, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    @Qed237: Well, it's deleted now, but I wonder if that was proper. The previously deleted version started out "Amos Nondi is a Kenyan footballer who plays for Kenyan Premier League side Gor Mahia...." The version you nominated as G4 and then withdrew today started out "Amos Nondi is a Kenyan footballer who plays for Georgian side Kolkheti Poti...." So it seems his status has changed. Isn't FC Kolkheti-1913 Poti a professional organization? ~Anachronist (talk) 17:16, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    They are not considered professional as they do not play in a WP:FPL. Qed237 (talk) 18:11, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Radford Photo.png

    OTRS agent: this file finally has permission granted in ticket:2017051810020832. It has been deleted and undeleted at times during the processing of the ticket due to insufficient information, but it has been confirmed now. Kindly restore it and ping me so I can adjust its licensing and attribution. Cheers, seb26 (talk) 14:45, 19 July 2017 (UTC) —seb26 (talk) 14:45, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Seb26:  Done, image restored. Please format the page as needed. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:40, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Codemenow

    this is the page of my business or my company website that's by I have created this page, and I haven't use anyone else content so why my page is deleted by you. Tell me what is the problem in my page that's by it is being deleted. Please tell me about the problem in this page. —Harendrachhekur (talk) 17:00, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Harendrachhekur:  Not done. I deleted it as unambiguous advertising or promotion. Wikipedia is NEVER to be used as a promotion or publicity medium. Also please read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest because you have a conflict of interest, and also read WP:PAID because you agreed to abide by Wikimedia:Terms of Use which require you to disclose any paid editing you do.
    If you want to create an article about your company, the only viable venue for an editor with a conflict of interest is to create the article in your sandbox or in draft space (for example you could create Draft:Codemenow) and submit it for review via Wikipedia:Articles for creation before it can be published in the main article space. ~Anachronist (talk) 17:21, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    could you tell me what I have to delete from this page then I will delete these things from my page after it I think there will no issue. —Harendrachhekur (talk) 17:28, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Traci Kochendorfer

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —66.213.105.3 (talk) 17:57, 19 July 2017 (UTC) This page was compensated and written by known sources and articles along with copyrighted photos of this celebrity and her achievements. The attacks from the ones who erased or editors who did not seek to speak to the editor who wrote the biography were in violation of online identity theft and scornfully abusive and insulting. There was past conversations with wiki staff about the stop to this with that these unknown editors on wiki be banned from continueing to insult and state that the sources on the individual were not viable without actually respectfully researching. in part there are a ton of wiki pages with her name as stated known person for achievements to include reliable known sources of her achievements. it is imperative that this or biography be recreated without bullying or harm so that her info is in wiki correctly. there are many sources online and can be asked for if needed. she has also had other names which only should be and were in the bio corners under name from past[reply]

    • Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Traci Kochendorfer, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Joe Decker (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Hut 8.5 20:48, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joybird_Furniture

    This page should not have been deleted based on the criteria A7 & G11. The article clearly described the company/business in an encyclopedic tone. The article belongs within the encyclopedia based off of the reliable sources listed on the page. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/where-we-live/wp/2016/12/14/online-furnishing-store-offers-custom-designs-in-midcentury-styles/?utm_term=.d2bb34fc19b1 http://www.furnituretoday.com/article/515624-e-tailer-joybird-launching-wholesale-division https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/11/25/realestate/Building-a-Custom-Sofa-Online.html http://www.designntrend.com/articles/57291/20150717/joybird-customizable-furniture-company-on-this-weeks-the-scoop-exclusive-interview.htm If the administrator wanted to tag this page to clean it up and add or change the language that's one thing, but to have this page tagged for speedy deletion was a mistake based on the article and the references that were posted when it was created. —Gobadgers5 (talk) 19:16, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    File:Oakland California 20041129.jpg

    The file was transferred to Commons and the original upload log etc. was not preserved. Requesting the deleted description page info. ——Guanaco 19:23, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Guanaco: uploader was Konky2000 (talk · contribs) the text was:

    "Photo taken by Aran Johnson on a United Airlines flight from SFO to PHL on Nov 30, 2004. View is out of left hand window as plane was heading East.

    In the center of image is Oakland's Lake Merritt which is directly under the high rise filled downtown Oakland.

    In the upper left portion of the image the Port of Oakland is visible as is the Oakland portion of the San Francisco Oakland Bay Bridge. In the upper right portion of the image are the towns of Emeryville and Berkeley.

    Two major freeways are visible. On the left side of the image travelling from the bottom to the top is CA-880, also known as 'The Nimitz.' On the right side of the image is CA-580.

    The body of water at the top of the picture is the San Francisco Bay. The estuary on the left side of the image is the Oakland Estuary, which separates Oakland from Alameda Island.

    {{CopyrightedFreeUseProvidedThat|credit given to Aran Johnson}}" Hut 8.5 20:03, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Hut 8.5: Thanks. I've updated the description on Commons. —Guanaco 20:09, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    kgbazar.com

    I created this page to the best of my knowledge, i researched for few months on this website, i visited there headquarter and i saw there work, now i hope that wikipedia should have information about this website, because website is reaching to public at very high speed and public wants to know more about this site thats why i created this page. —Jsgondaliya87 (talk) 04:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    @Jsgondaliya87: The article was only two sentences, cited no coverage in independent reliable sources, and failed to assert any credible significance significance of the subject. Therefore: Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Salvidrim! (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 05:14, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Technical Guruji

    No reasoning given. — giteshs78 07:04, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


    User:Gitesh_Sharma

    Please DO not delete this is my user page please pease... — giteshs78 07:09, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Thanks for drawing attention to this. I have now deleted it. Your user page is at User:Giteshs78 and I have trimmed it back. It should not look like a social media link farm. You may wish to register at LinkedIn if you want to promote yourself and your "business", but you cannot do that here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:53, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Alan Laney

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Apicker (talk) 10:42, 20 July 2017 (UTC) Alan Laney Alan Laney, is an American Singer Songwriter and recording artist of note. This page should not be deleted and should be reinstated.[reply]

    Technical Guruji (2)

    He is a Youtuber(Technical Guruji).He is also live in Dubai. He is Indian. He is Indian Tech Reviewer. Please Go Technical Guruji and search Technical Guruji. “Technical Guruji” is a small Tech Channel on YouTube channel run by myself, Gaurav Chaudhary. I started this channel back in October 2015, during those days I had just completed my M.E. (Microelectronics) from BITS Pilani, and joined my family business after getting certified from Dubai Police as a Security Systems Engineer. Since my childhood days I was inclined towards technology and as I was getting some free time in my daily routine, I thought why not share some of my little knowledge to the masses, there could have been nothing better than Hindi, plain simple Hindi. Initially, I used to upload 1 video everyday, that used to get an average of 300-400 views. But as they say “Patience pays off”. Today, “Technical Guruji” has garnered over 1 Million subscribers, with more than 80 Million video views on the channel, all this, just in a span of 16 months. “If you go viral, you are here to stay,” says YouTube, and today “Technical Guruji” is India’s Largest Tech Channel on YouTube. So, giving a quick overview about “Technical Guruji”, here you’ll find 2 videos everyday, covering Explanation of Various Technologies, Latest Tech News, Tech Tricks and Tutorials, Discussion on Trending Tech Topics and a lots more. Pease, Please, Please...... — giteshs78 11:34, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Just wait for someone else to write about you. Take a read of WP:Autobiography. I will let someone else decide if they want to undelete the page in this case. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:38, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Not done and will not be done. It's a personal essay written in the first person, a verbatim copy of what is written above, with no references to any independent reliable sources, and therefore not appropriate for an encyclopedia article. It's been deleted four times now. Repeatedly recreating an article deemed unacceptable is disruptive to the project, so I have protected the article from being re-created. If you really must write an article about yourself, do it in your sandbox or in draft space, and submit for review it via Wikipedia:Articles for creation (AFC). You have a conflict of interest about yourself, and the only viable venue for an editor with a conflict of interest is to go through AFC. ~Anachronist (talk) 14:32, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Swan11jf

    {{subst:refund|1= User:Swan11jf |2= Hi there. I believe my username will be deleted due to vandalism by another user: Laocoön. This user is my friend, and attached is a transcript of a hangouts conversation I had with him - this shows that I am not responsible for the vandalism: https://pasteboard.co/GBQgA6o.png

    I hope this shows that I do not own Laocoon and it should be his account that should be deleted, not mine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swan11jf (talk • contribs) 17:52, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    • @Swan11jf: nobody is going to delete, block or otherwise disable your account because of something somebody else did (it isn't actually possible to delete an account, FWIW). Laocoön has been indefinitely blocked from editing, that person won't be making any more edits from that account. And the user page s/he created for you has been so comprehensively erased that even administrators like me can't see what was in it. You don't have anything to worry about. Hut 8.5 18:05, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Draft:People The Kangaroo

    (This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) GMaillard (talk) 21:05, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Alan Laney (2)

    Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Apicker (talk) 00:51, 21 July 2017 (UTC) Alan Laney This page has been up and in use for 6 years. This page is a historical record and progression of a current Artist. It is becoming apparent that a single individual is attempting to delete thus page due to a possible personal vendetta or for other interests.[reply]

    Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nagamanyam D Dasari

    I, Vinodsagar, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Vinodsagar (talk) 05:56, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nagamanyam D Dasari

    I was unwell for quite some time and could not edit the page on time and the page was deleted. please undelete this page, to enable me to edit and save. Regards. —Vinodsagar (talk) 05:59, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Light (fantasy)

    The article Light (fantasy) was deleted as 'original research' while I was still adding sources. It was already marked for deletion before I could add a second sentence... I have asked the closing administrator, Anachronist to move it to draft, so I can continue working on the text[1], but (s)he has not responded. Please move it to Draft:Light (fantasy) with the editing history. Dolberty (talk) 10:36, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Paraduin

    The article Paraduin was deleted for lack of significant coverage in reliable sources, which I think is not true. People claimed it was 'stealing content from Liberland' but it is the other way around, Liberland is the copycat. The author was even banned for creating this article, and some of the delete and ban voters are Liberland fans, so part of this seems personal. I think the article was fine but not complete yet. I'd like to work on it, as a draft if it's not undeleted as an article. Dolberty (talk) 11:13, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=791614201"