Jump to content

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Onceloose (talk | contribs)
62 edits
Onceloose (talk | contribs)
62 edits
Line 25: Line 25:
The above user was involved in a edit war quite some time ago apparently. The user has started adding material to [[For Life (Isis Gee song)]] falsifying the songs position in the eurovision song contest. The song came JOINT LAST and is listed as such. The user continues to add that it came second last which is incorrect as it is listed in alphabetical order as last place.
The above user was involved in a edit war quite some time ago apparently. The user has started adding material to [[For Life (Isis Gee song)]] falsifying the songs position in the eurovision song contest. The song came JOINT LAST and is listed as such. The user continues to add that it came second last which is incorrect as it is listed in alphabetical order as last place.


The user has been warned about adding the same information in the past but is still doing it. In order to stop an edit war please block the above user or protect the page to leave it as JOINT LAST.
The user has been warned about adding the same information in the past but is still doing it.


From the talk page it looks like the user was blocked for this same naughtiness in July.
⚫
[[User:Onceloose|Onceloose]] ([[User talk:Onceloose|talk]]) 14:18, 27 August 2008 (UTC)


In order to stop an edit war please block the above user to leave the page as JOINT LAST.

⚫
[[User:Onceloose|Onceloose]] ([[User talk:Onceloose|talk]]) 14:18, 27 August 2008 (UTC)


== [[User:24.180.21.121]] reported by [[User:Movingboxes]] (Result: blocked at 09:12 by [[User:Shell Kinney]]) ==
== [[User:24.180.21.121]] reported by [[User:Movingboxes]] (Result: blocked at 09:12 by [[User:Shell Kinney]]) ==

Revision as of 14:22, 27 August 2008

Template:Moveprotected

    Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard
    Shortcuts
    Update this page

    This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

    You must notify any user you have reported.

    You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.

    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    Additional notes
    • When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
    • The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
    • Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
    • Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.
    Definition of edit warring
    Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.
    Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)
    An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.

    Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

    Click here to create a new report


    Violations

    Please place new reports at the BOTTOM. If you do not see your report, you can search the archives for it.


    User:Pink Evolution reported by User:Onceloose

    The above user was involved in a edit war quite some time ago apparently. The user has started adding material to For Life (Isis Gee song) falsifying the songs position in the eurovision song contest. The song came JOINT LAST and is listed as such. The user continues to add that it came second last which is incorrect as it is listed in alphabetical order as last place.

    The user has been warned about adding the same information in the past but is still doing it.

    From the talk page it looks like the user was blocked for this same naughtiness in July. 

    In order to stop an edit war please block the above user to leave the page as JOINT LAST.

    Onceloose (talk) 14:18, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    User:24.180.21.121 reported by User:Movingboxes (Result: blocked at 09:12 by User:Shell Kinney)

    24.180.21.121 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Time reported: 2:48 AM

    • Previous version reverted to: [1]


    • Diff of 3RR warning: [5]

    User:Criminologist1963 reported by User:WLU (Result: Stale)

    Criminologist1963 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Time reported: 23:04, 23 August 2008 (UTC)


    Also note AN discussion which has yet to garner outside attention. WLU (talk) 23:04, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Stale Sorry, but this report has become stale waiting for a resolution at WP:AN. Re-report if the issue occurs again, referencing this report as further evidence. CIreland (talk) 20:11, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    To date there has been no response on AN, but also no further reversions to the pages involved or discussions on the talk pages. If things remain this way then no intervention is required, if 3rr happens againI will file a new report. WLU (talk) 13:59, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Noble12345 reported by User:Queerbubbles (Result: No vio)

    Noble12345 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Time reported: 23:15, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

    • Previous version reverted to: [6]


    • 1st revert: [7]
    • 2nd revert: [8]
    • 3rd revert: [9]
    • 4th revert: None yet
    • Diff of 3RR warning: [10]
    No violation The fourth revert never occurred. CIreland (talk) 20:12, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Accountforwp reported by User:Jamesbeat (Result: 24 hours for the IP)

    Accountforwp (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Time reported: 10:41, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

    Initial reverts, which resulted in being blocked for 24 hours on 20 August 2008 and for 1 week on 22 August 2008.

    23:29, 21 August 2008

    08:11, 22 August 2008

    09:57, 22 August 2008

    10:36, 22 August 2008

    Now the same user is using the IP address 84.81.151.103 to delete major parts of the article. There is not much doubt that it is still the same person as can be seen in the discussion on the article's talk page. He insists that his version, which is very much lacking WP:NPOV has to be kept or the page will be "blanked". For violating NPOV see also comment by user Themfromspace here.

    Revert #01 20:50, 23 August 2008

    Revert #02 20:51, 23 August 2008

    Revert #17 20:59, 23 August 2008

    Revert #18 22:39, 23 August 2008

    Revert #19 22:40, 23 August 2008

    Revert #29 22:48, 23 August 2008

    Revert #30 06:53, 24 August 2008

    • Diff of 3RR warning: [11]
    Blocked the IP editor 84.81.151.103 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). I hope that this article doesn't come back here in a new 3RR report until all the associated WP:BLP issues are properly discussed on the article Talk. EdJohnston (talk) 22:28, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    I hope so, too. This editor or his apparent sockpuppet just told me on my talk page that he will continue to delete this material unless he is allowed to insert his controversial BLP information. So I told him again that he first has to discuss the issue on the article's talk page and try to reach a consensus. Fingers crossed that he will act accordingly this time. At least he does not add the controversial material at the moment. (Jamesbeat (talk) 22:45, 24 August 2008 (UTC))[reply]

    User:Holla213 reported by User:Kww (Result:Blocked for 24 hours )

    Holla213 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)


    Time reported: 16:00, 24 August 2008 (UTC)


    And, as icing on the cake,

    Anyone that doubts that the IP is a sock should look at the edit histories of the two accounts, especially the fascination with the Harvard Extension School.


    This isn't a widespread edit war, it's limited to one editor that doesn't seem to understand what goes in a lead. Based on the sockpuppeting, I think both the named account and 128.103.142.23 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) need a block.

    I've blocked both the user and the IP for 24 hours, Metros (talk) 16:06, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    User:216.211.57.63 reported by Delicious carbuncle (Result: 72 hours)

    Pain Lies on the Riverside (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). 216.211.57.63 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log):

    Time reported: 19:17, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

    • Diff of warning: here

    Also, 3RR on Shit Towne, The Beauty of Gray, Mirror Song, and Operation Spirit (The Tyranny of Tradition). This is likely a sockpuppet of User:Swamilive. —Delicious carbuncle (talk) 19:17, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Blocked – for a period of 72 hours To match the duration of the block most recently given to User:Swamilive. If sockpuppetry could be conclusively shown then a longer block of the IP might be justified. The only purpose in life of this IP account seems to be to undo redirects created by Delicious carbuncle and others. EdJohnston (talk) 22:10, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    User:70.45.160.140 reported by User:Vary (Result: Blocked 72 hours)

    70.45.160.140 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Time reported: 19:59, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

    Blocked – for a period of 72 hours Toddst1 (talk) 00:11, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Opinoso reported by User:Crazyaboutlost (Result: No vio)

    Opinoso (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    I'm not sure if I'm doing it right, nor if this is the right place to do so (should it be on Wikipedia:Requests for page protection??), but this user has a seriously issue on pt:wiki and he's trying to make some noise here.

    See [12].

    Sorry if I made any mistake.

    Crazyaboutlost (talk) 03:05, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    No violation. Three-revert-rule not violated. CIreland (talk) 20:14, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Dontworry reported by User:EvaK (Result: No violation)

    Dontworry (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    No violation The three-revert-rule prohibits making 4 or more edits in a 24 hour period. That has not occurred. CIreland (talk) 14:14, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    User:78.149.202.191 reported by User:JdeJ (Result: 48 hours)

    78.149.202.191 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Time reported: 13:48, 25 August 2008 (UTC)


    • Diff of 3RR warning: 14.10 August 25 As the user is a sock-puppet of banned troll MagdelenaDiArco, he is very well aware of the rules.
    Firstly, can you pleast stop using personal attackos. Secondly, no, all of those were not "reverts", since if you actually checked the diffs, you would see I was not simply restoring the same version, but trying to add more sources each time. Therefore, it is not a break of the rule. 78.149.202.191 (talk) 14:00, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    (Note, the article has been successfully stabilized now) 213.185.116.11 (talk) 14:07, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Seems to be more edit-warring at Maltese language. I am a neutral observer and can't really comment on the issues, but something seems to be going wrong with the editing process here. — Alan✉ 15:08, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Alan is right, the same user is also edit warring extensively on Maltese language, with over 10 edits today. Yes, the user makes cosmetic changes when reverting, but the main message is still there, being reverted all the time. Please note that the reported user most likely is the same as the IP who posted the lie above about "the article now being stabilized". Both IPs have performed exactly the same reversions, and using another to post false comments to help the account being reported is an old trick used by MagdelenaDiArco, making me even more convinced that we are dealing with multiple sock-puppets. JdeJ (talk) 16:12, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Not sure why I bothered, but I did post a block warning after 15 reverts on Maltese language. I will block the IP myself if this continues. kwami (talk) 19:58, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    User:70.133.65.158 reported by User:Mikemill (Result: 24 hours)

    70.133.65.158 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Time reported: 15:18, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

    • Previous version reverted to: [13] First edit that kicked off the entire thing


    Blocked – for a period of 24 hours EdJohnston (talk) 23:36, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    User:TechBear reported by User:Cumulus Clouds (Result: 72h)

    TechBear (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Time reported: 15:59, 25 August 2008 (UTC)


    User:A Link to the Past reported by User:Megata Sanshiro (Result: no action)

    A Link to the Past (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Time reported: 16:17, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

    • Previous version reverted to: (Complex reverts) the actual part that is being reverted to is:
    |image = [[Image:Yoshi.jpg|256px]]
|caption = Yoshi as he appears in Yoshi's Island DS (2006), carrying Mario
(...)
[[Image:Yoshi3.jpg|256px|thumb|Yoshi as he appears in ''[[Super Smash Bros. Brawl]]'' (2008)]]

    which is reverted to: 

    |image = [[Image:Yoshi3.jpg|256px]]
|caption = Yoshi as he appears in Super Smash Bros. Brawl (2008) 
(...)
[[Image:Yoshi.jpg|256px|thumb|Yoshi as he appears in ''[[Yoshi's Island DS]]'' (2006) with [[Mario#Baby Mario|Baby Mario]] on his back.]]


    • This is not a violation of 4 reverts within a single day, but the reverts have been happening for multiple days now and there is a clear intent to continue reverting again and again. User has previously been blocked dozens of times for 3RR violations[14].

    User:Anatoly.bourov reported by User:Hobartimus (Result: 24h)

    User:Anatoly.bourov (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Time reported: 18:59, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

    • Previous version reverted to: 12:33


    • Diff of 3RR warning: 17:52

    All dates are August 25. He since even replied to the 3RR warning given to him and continued to revert regardless. Only 4 reverts were listed in the report although he did a lot more by the definition "undoing the actions of another editor" on the same article within 24 hours. Hobartimus (talk) 18:58, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Actually, he made five reverts. I recommended this user to revert himself back, which would help him to avoid sanctions (he seems to be a newcomer). Unfortunately, he interpreted my recommendation as a "threat" and apparently made 5th revert to prove his point.Biophys (talk) 19:50, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Also note that the text repeatedly inserted by Anatoly.bourov was a copyright violation - please compare with the original reference. So, whoever reverted him was not a "vandal" but enforced WP policies.Biophys (talk) 20:38, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Delicious_carbuncle reported by User:Swamilive (Result: No action)

    Delicious_carbuncle (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Time reported: 21:14, 25 August 2008 (UTC)


    User is reverting just outside a 24-hour timeframe to avoid 3RR on a technicality. Also, 3RR on Shit Towne, Pain Lies on the Riverside, Mirror Song, Horse, and Operation Spirit (The Tyranny of Tradition).

    User:12.202.220.193 reported by User:Commodore Sloat (Result: 24h)

    12.202.220.193 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Time reported: 23:10, 25 August 2008 (UTC)


    Please note that the user was also warned three times by the Bot concerning inappropriate links that he keeps adding into the article as well.[15][16][17] He has also been warned about disruptive editing and other Wikipedia policies; a longer block than usual may be indicated here. csloat (talk) 23:10, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Fftest12 reported by User:Ctjf83 (Result: 18 hours )

    Fftest12 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Time reported: 23:58, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

    • Previous version reverted to: [18]



    • Diff of 3RR warning: [25]
    Blocked – for a period of 18 hours As this user is reverting 5 other users, the problem is clear. - Rjd0060 (talk) 00:53, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    User:AzureFury reported by User:Protonk (Result: Page protected)

    AzureFury (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Time reported: 03:40, 26 August 2008 (UTC)


    • This isn't strictly 4 reverts in 24 hours but the spirit is what matters. This is the same content and 5 reverts of it, despite discussion on the talk page. Subject is clearly aware of the 3RR and seems to be intending to skirt it deliberately. His response to my 3RR warning above wasn't really civil but also gave me the distinct impression he was intending to push the content reversion rules to the limit. Protonk (talk) 03:40, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • I came here to report this user as well. Note that this user has been previously blocked for a 3RR violation on this page before. He knows better than to strictly break 3RR but he has reverted three different editors against significant consensus. Oren0 (talk) 03:43, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    • This user edit warred to get his version, and then you protect the page and don't subject the user to anything? What the hell kind of logic is that, it certainly doesn't send the right message to anyone that wishes to edit war. Arzel (talk) 16:46, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    User_talk:70.240.209.9 reported by User:SpyMagician (Result: Both users blocked)

    70.240.209.9 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Time reported: 04:15, 26 August 2008 (UTC)


    --SpyMagician (talk) 04:15, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Soupforone reported by User:RemoTheDog (Result: no violation)

    Soupforone (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Time reported: 05:28, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

    • Previous version reverted to: [26]


    User:G2bambino reported by User:dlatimer (Result: 31 hours)

    G2bambino (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Time reported: 10:06, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

    • Previous version reverted to: [34]
    • Diff of 3RR warning: [43]

    Note: Editwar started with one user, then continued with myself.

    Blocked – for a period of 31 hours Stifle (talk) 15:13, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    User:AlexLevyOne reported by User:JohnInDC (Result: 55h)

    AlexLevyOne (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Time reported: 16:05, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

    • Previous version reverted to: [44]
    • Diff of 3RR warning: [49]

    Editor repeatedly inserted poorly-sourced assertion re G.W. Bush and this company (making similar repeated edits to GW Bush and earning a 3RR warning there too). Warnings placed on user Talk page were blanked shortly thereafter. The relevant Talk exchanges are visible on the diff above showing the 3RR warning.

    User:SkyBon reported by User:Kober (Result: blocked 48 hours )

    SkyBon (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Time reported: 19:21, 26 August 2008 (UTC)


    User:SkyBon repeatedly removes the sourced passage from the article, claiming that the source - Human Rights Watch - "simply hates Russia". He describes his edits as "reversal of vandalism".--KoberTalk 19:21, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 3RR:[reply]

    Blocked – for a period of 48 hours Toddst1 (talk) 19:37, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


    User:TimWhiskas reported by LotLE×talk (Result: 31h)

    Human (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). TimWhiskas (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log): Time reported: 19:41, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Diffs are listed from oldest to newest, dates are in UTC

    1. 17:30, 26 August 2008 (edit summary: "")
    2. 17:31, 26 August 2008 (edit summary: "")
    3. 17:36, 26 August 2008 (edit summary: "Undid revision 234392301 by UtherSRG (talk)")
    4. 17:43, 26 August 2008 (edit summary: "rv per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Human/Archive_26#Real_naked_human")
    5. 17:45, 26 August 2008 (edit summary: "rv per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Human/Archive_26#Real_naked_human")
    6. 17:49, 26 August 2008 (edit summary: "rv per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Human/Archive_26#Real_naked_human")
    7. 18:55, 26 August 2008 (edit summary: "Undid revision 234402227 by Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters (talk)")
    8. 19:10, 26 August 2008 (edit summary: "rv. you are likely to get it first.")
    9. 19:20, 26 August 2008 (edit summary: "so here we go. rv per per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Human/Archive_26#Real_naked_human")

    —LotLE×talk 19:41, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    User first edited as IP address in same dynamic range to repeatedly insert non-consensus change. After reversions by various editors, user created an account, TimWhiskas, to try to evade the 3RR violation, and continued to edit war. Moreover, edit comments contain taunts about trying to get other users to 3RR first (presumably because we wouldn't notice the user is the IP address).

    User:76.101.72.59 reported by User:Nukes4Tots (Result: 2 weeks)

    76.101.72.59 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Time reported: 00:07, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

    • Previous version reverted to: [50]


    • Diff of 3RR warning: 1923
    Blocked – for a period of 2 weeks 3RR violation plus nasty personal attacks. Escalating from the previous block in July. EdJohnston (talk) 00:24, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Dscotese reported by User:VegitaU (Result:Decline - not all edits are reversions. Toddst1 (talk) )

    Dscotese (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Time reported: 01:35, 27 August 2008 (UTC)


    -- Veggy (talk) 01:35, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    Comment: I added information in italics to the above report. The first, 2nd and 4th revert remove the word "account" and resplace it with "theory". The 3rd revert is arguably a revert because it removes the phrase "led to the collapse of the Twin Towers", although it replaces it with the similar phrase "the collapse of both Twin Towers was caused by" earlier in the sentence. VegitaU did 3 reverts during the same time period. Coppertwig (talk) 02:06, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    User:190.41.114.139 reported by Storm Rider (talk) (Result: page protected)

    User:190.41.114.139 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Time reported: 02:03, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

    • Previous version reverted to: [51]

    I suspect that a fourth revert was by the same ANON given the language used in the explanation found here, but I cannot be absolutely positive; the area from where the edit generates is the same, but not an identical computer. The ANON as been warned on their discussion page and in the reverts of their edits in the article. If the language were not so obviously POV, I would not have reported it. --Storm Rider (talk) 02:03, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    User:Mod objective reported by User:Movingboxes (Result: 31h)

    Mod objective (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Time reported: 11:52, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

    • Previous version reverted to: [52]


    • Diff of 3RR warning: [57]
    Plus one more revert (earlier) that Movingboxes missed:


    User:Melonbarmonster2 reported by User:Sennen goroshi (Result: )

    Melonbarmonster2 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

    Time reported: 13:45, 27 August 2008 (UTC)


    6 important details.

    1. This user was blocked from editing for 48 hours for edit warring 5 days ago. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3AMelonbarmonster2

    2. The reverts are not exactly the same, one is changing text, one is removal of a section - but all 4 edits are reverts.

    3. The first edit is a revert, it is the removal of a section that has been discussed in the past and the editor in question was involved in the discussion, while using his previous ID.

    quote "In the context of the English Wikipedia three revert rule, a revert is defined more broadly as the undoing of another editor's work by returning any part of a page to an older version." The first edit was reverting the article to the version that had been in existence due to consensus for a long time, the editor was well aware of the consensus, was involved in the discussion, and just because the revert is months after consensus was achieved does not make it anything other than a revert.

    4. Although this is a new(ish) account (that has 1 edit warring block already) the user was previously using another account which was blocked on more than one occasion, http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&page=User%3AMelonbarmonster so the editor is well aware of 3RR

    5. even if the editor had made only 3 reverts, and not 4, the fact that they were blocked for edit warring 5 days ago, should be enough to show that the actions on the Kimchi article are more than deserving of another block.

    6. In the middle of the reverts on the article in question, the above editor took time to send a message to the talk page of the editor he was edit warring with, stating among other things "Please stop revert warring. If you continue to revert I will take formal courses of action." after leaving this message he went back to the article and continued with his reverts. This is borderline gaming, and shows a total disregard for the wikipedia rules that relate to reverts.

    Example

    == [[User:<!--Place Name of 3RR "violator" here-->]] reported by [[User:<!-- Your NAME -->]] (Result: ) ==

*[[WP:3RR|Three-revert rule]] violation on {{Article|<!-- Place name of Article here -->}}. 

{{3RRV|<!--Place Name of 3RR "violator" here-->}} 

Time reported: ~~~~~

*Previous version reverted to: [http://VersionLink VERSIONTIME] <!-- This is MANDATORY. -->

<!-- The link above must be to a version, not a diff, and must be from BEFORE all the
reverting took place. This helps us establish that the first edit, in particular, is a
revert to a previous version.
For more complex reverts it may be necessary to provide a previous version for each revert
and/or the actual words (in bold) that are being reverted or reverted to. -->

<!-- In the below section, use diffs and NOT previous versions. 
See Help:Diff or Wikipedia:Simplest_diff_guide if you do not know what a diff is. -->

*1st revert: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
*2nd revert: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
*3rd revert: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]
*4th revert: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]

*Diff of 3RR warning: [http://DIFFS DIFFTIME]



    See also

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&oldid=234570127"